-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Chris Withers wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>>> The confusion surrounding PIL almost makes me want to write some sort of
>>> document listing the orginal problem along with all the various
>> Both of these show you the exact problem the official distribution has
>> with setuptools. It uses a package name of '',
> How'd you figure that?
> Line 48 and 480 of PIL 1.1.7's setup.py would suggest it uses a package
> name of "PIL"...
>> As this is a repackaging of a specific version of PIL, it needs to be
>> done again for each new release. So far we only had a repackaging of
>> the 1.1.6 version, I contributed one for 1.1.7 now.
> I would hazard a guess that none of the above are needed anymore ;-)
You would be wrong, as you would know if you had tried running the
effbot's packages inside an eggified environment: he is actively
hostile to changes which would make this all go away, which leaves us
with the necessity of forking his release.
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Repoze-dev mailing list