John Gee wrote:
> The restore can include surprising files. If Retrospect backed up a
> copy of the file from a different location or even from a different
> computer in the same backup set, it may offer to restore it to
> effectively multiple locations.
>
> I am not sure if this explains what you are seeing. Have you got a
> copy of agtman15.pdf in the folders that were backed up?
Why, yes, I do, John! I didn't realize that, but your
question sent me checking, and sure enough, there's
an identical copy in the C:\Program Files\Agent folder,
which *is* one of the folders I specified in my
selector. Both agtman15.pdf files have identical specs:
File Name Size Modified
------------ --------- ---------------
agtman15.pdf 1,914,632 10-14-99 9:47p
So now I can see that Retrospect isn't doing something
totally spurious and arbitrary that I can't understand;
it's just doing something that seemingly it's *supposed*
to do, that I can't understand.
What's the "rule", the rationale, that Retrospect is
following here?
-- Steve
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
