>Retrospect is just using
>a protocol, be it TCP or Appletalk, to do it's job, right? Maybe it's a
>question of how Retro. _uses_ that protocol. Anyone from Dantz want to
>jump in here?
Before blaming Retrospect, try transferring a very large file from
one mac to the other and see if it really makes it. I'm talking
large... 300 to 500 MB in size.
Retrospect copies files in a very steady stream. Web browsing,
printing, and email do it in short burst.
Yes, if you network has a minor problem, it will show up in
Retrospect. It will also show up in ARCServe and it will also show
up in Amanda. It is not platform or software dependant.
I do network performance monitoring all the time here and still one
of my earliest indicators of possible problems is the nightly backups.
MB
--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives: <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
