I can't speak for everyone but I hope you keep this discussion on the list. If
it does happen to go off-line, I would greatly appreciate a copy of the final
thoughts.
There was a thread that went around a couple of months ago with price
comparisons for all of these different media types (including hardware and
media) but I'm sure it's already outdated.  The VXA drive from Ecrix looked
like it had potential for a smaller setup due to it's price of drives and
media. The media also looks very reliable according to the material on their
web site.  I am currently using DLT and it gets a little expensive to stay as
redundant as I would like to be.  I've noticed that Ecrix is coming out with
larger tape libraries, Does anyone think that will make it a more viable
solution or is AIT still the way to go?
thanks,
Tim


Stephen Jones wrote:

> I would have to say AIT.  Sony pulled the plug on the proposed DDS-5 so I
> wouldn't suggest that line at all (end of product life).  Also, DAT drives
> have 1/5th the head life expectancy (10,000 hours instead of AIT's 50,000
> hours).
>
> DLT would definitely be better than DAT but is faced with the same situation
> as 4mm.  The current best DLT is the 8000 series.  It's 40GB uncompressed by
> 6MB/second.  The Gen I version of the upcoming SuperDLT will *NOT* be
> backward compatible.  Are you prepared to purchase something that will not
> work with the very next version of the hardware?
>
> AIT, also made by Sony, gives you two choices (AIT-1 and AIT-2).  AIT-1
> (35GB/3MB/second uncompressed) inside a library costs less than $4500 and
> holds 525GB uncompressed.  AIT-2 is 50GB by 6MB/second (and is considerably
> less than a DLT library - it's also self-cleaning, DLT is not).
>
> AIT-2 is backward compatible (read and write) with AIT-1.  You could start
> with AIT-1 and upgrade to AIT-2 in the future should you need more capacity
> and speed -- and use the very same library chassis.
>
> AIT-3 (100GB by 12MB/second) is due out later this year and is backward
> compatible with AIT-1 and 2.  When AIT-4 hits the street two years form now
> (a proposed 200GB by 24MB/second), it too will be backward compatible with
> all previous AIT generations.
>
> DLT, up to a couple years ago, was definitely king of the hill.  But in the
> game of technology, no one stands paramount indefinitely.  AIT has
> definitely become more popular -- with a roadmap to larger/faster drives
> while remaining backward compatible.  I was surprised to hear the news that
> DLT could not offer backward compatibility with their upcoming SuperDLT
> drive.  We have many DLT customers who will not be able to upgrade.  In
> fact, because of that, a lot of our DLT customers have moved to AIT.
>
> Please feel free to contact me with any tech questions, I have been a
> storage engineer for ten years and work with all formats daily.
>
> All the best!
>
> Steve
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives:        <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
> Search:  <http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/>
>
> For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.



--
----------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives:        <http://list.working-dogs.com/lists/retro-talk/>
Search:  <http://www.mail-archive.com/retro-talk%40latchkey.com/>

For urgent issues, please contact Dantz technical support directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or 925.253.3050.

Reply via email to