Did a search through all of .git for the old server and the base path ("code/svn") and got no hits. If it is stored compressed in some metadata somewhere it might not be obvious though :-/ I have found references to "git svn clone --no-metadata" online, but I think that only helps when doing the initial migration, not later on.
--Noah > -----Original Message----- > From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christian Hammond > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 2:24 PM > To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: git svn info very slow > > Huh, I haven't seen that before. There's probably something in .git/ > somewhere, but where, I don't know. Maybe grep around for part of the > repository path? > > I have to run, but I'll play with this a bit and see if I can help > figure it out. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Noah Kantrowitz <n...@coderanger.net> > wrote: > > > I don't see anything in .git/config about svn (file attached), > and from a > fresh clone .git/svn doesn't exist. The first time I run git svn > info it > prints out the following: > $ time git svn info > Migrating from a git-svn v1 layout... > Data from a previous version of git-svn exists, but > .git/svn > (required for this version (1.7.3.1.msysgit.0) of git-svn) > does not > exist. > Done migrating from a git-svn v1 layout > > and then takes 7 minutes to come back with "Unable to determine > upstream SVN > information from working tree history". All future runs don't > print the > migration message (which makes sense), but they still take > forever. The > first run does create .git/svn, but it stays empty. Is there > somewhere else > I should look to de-svn this repo? > > --Noah > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > > [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Christian > Hammond > > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 1:50 PM > > To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: git svn info very slow > > > > Hi Noah, > > > > It sounds like the repositories are still configured for git- > svn. If > > you remove that configuration, the call to git svn info should > fail > > immediately. It's been a while, but I think this is in > .git/config. > > > > Christian > > > > > > On Friday, January 28, 2011, Noah Kantrowitz > <n...@coderanger.net> > > wrote: > > > We are trying to start using reviewboard with one of our > bigger repos > > (~5k revs) and we are having a lot of trouble with "giv svn > info". > > post-review runs this every time to check if the current repo > is under > > git-svn control (disclaimer: a lot of those 5k revs were > migrated from > > SVN using git-svn, but that was a one-time conversion), and > given that > > it takes 7 minutes on our main branch, that makes post-review > > very aggravating. Is there some way to turn this check off > since we > > know for sure that it will never come back true? Something in > git > > config or .reviewboardrc would be ideal so we don't have to > remember > > another command-line argument each time. Does this exist or > should I > > submit a patch? > > > --Noah KantrowitzAtari, Inc > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > > -- > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > > > -- > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > <mailto:reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en