The extensions work will still be 2.0. We will either end up going from 1.6 to 2.0, or we'll package a bunch of GSoC/UCOSP work as 1.7 while working on 2.0.
Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:20 PM, Jan Koprowski <jan.koprow...@gmail.com>wrote: > Christian! > > It is great news! 1.7 sounds better then 2.0 :) Thanks! > > Regards, > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> > wrote: > > Extensions are going to be the big focus once we get 1.6 out the door. A > lot > > of work has gone into it by many, many students through both UCOSP and > GSoC, > > so that'll continue :) > > > > Webhooks will end up being an exension. We had some work toward > refactoring > > it into an extension recently. > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Jan Koprowski <jan.koprow...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Christian, > >> > >> I'm surprised You share my point of view. I agree with You that > >> making something new is much more interesting then ending someone's > >> work. Things I can't wait are: > >> * Kicked as Extensions with many, many, many hooks provided and well > >> documented :D > >> * Cool webhooks sending also some data (objects) to given URL :P > >> * Planty of ReviewBoard-Django signals perfectly documented on > >> docs.reviewboard.org :) > >> > >> That is probably all because this allow me to spice ReviewBoard by my > >> own :) for my company :] and waiting for 2.0 since I get it drive me > >> crazy :D > >> > >> Greetings from Poland. > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > I quite agree. A lot of that needs to be finished up. For some of it, > >> > we've > >> > had students go and finish up the project (or at least get further on > >> > it) > >> > and we'll probably continue to do that. > >> > > >> > There's always, of course, the need to deliver an interesting project > >> > that a > >> > student can work on. Finishing up someone else's work is not nearly as > >> > attractive as doing something new and exciting, so we need to do a bit > >> > of > >> > both, I think. > >> > > >> > Any specific branches you're wanting work done on? > >> > > >> > Christian > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com > >> > Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org > >> > VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Jan Koprowski > >> > <jan.koprow...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> Personally I will be glad if GSoC won't provide new features because > >> >> there is too much cool stuff waiting on non-public branches I can't > >> >> wait. IMHO this stuff wait too long and providing it to stable > version > >> >> should be the first goal. > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> > >> >> Jan > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 1:39 AM, Paul Schulz <p...@mawsonlakes.org> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > Hi Christian, > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Christian Hammond > >> >> > <chip...@chipx86.com> > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> Hey everyone, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> We've been accepted again this year in Google's Summer of Code, a > >> >> >> yearly > >> >> >> event where students from around the world participate in open > >> >> >> source > >> >> >> projects, developing work experience and getting paid for it. > >> >> > > >> >> > (snip) > >> >> > > >> >> >> We're also looking for ideas for projects, so if you have an idea > >> >> >> for > >> >> >> something awesome you'd like to see, just reply :) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks! > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Christian > >> >> > > >> >> > I work as a System Administrator for a large(ish) software > >> >> > engineering > >> >> > organisation and we are making use of and relying on ReviewBoard > >> >> > extensively in our software development process. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thank you for your efforts so far. Working with the Engineers, I > more > >> >> > often hear about where the tool falls short, rather then about all > >> >> > the > >> >> > other really good things about ReviewBoard that actually works > really > >> >> > well. > >> >> > > >> >> > The this end, I did an internal survey and came up with the > following > >> >> > suggestions for feature improvements (see below). > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks again for everyones efforts, > >> >> > Paul > >> >> > > >> >> > ------------------------------------------ > >> >> > [Workflow] > >> >> > > >> >> > * Ship-it lockout or reset > >> >> > > >> >> > If the ship-it option has been selected, then no other > changes/diffs > >> >> > can be uploaded. Comments can still be made, or if a change to the > >> >> > code is made, then the ship-it tags are removed. > >> >> > > >> >> > * Master Ship-it > >> >> > > >> >> > A reviewer (or group) with master ship-it power is all that is > >> >> > required to designate that a patch be shipped. > >> >> > > >> >> > * Automated Ship-it patch submission > >> >> > > >> >> > If a patch is marked as ship-it, than commit it to the repository. > >> >> > (All of the required information is available, including commit > >> >> > comment.) > >> >> > > >> >> > * Explicitly separate Reviewers from Shippers > >> >> > > >> >> > A shipper is someone with shipping powers, a reviewer is someone > who > >> >> > is included in the review for comment. > >> >> > > >> >> > [Integration] > >> >> > > >> >> > * Bugzilla > >> >> > > >> >> > Add a bug report comment to a bug once a review has been completed. > >> >> > > >> >> > * Subversion > >> >> > > >> >> > Block a check in of a patch/changeset until a review has been > >> >> > approved > >> >> > (for some definition of approved). > >> >> > > >> >> > [Improvements] > >> >> > > >> >> > * Allow use of Full Name where usernames are displayed > >> >> > > >> >> > Reviewboard has access to full names, it should make more use of > >> >> > them. > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >> >> > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> >> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> >> > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> ><> Jan Koprowski > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > >> >> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > >> >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > >> >> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> >> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > >> >> For more options, visit this group at > >> >> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> ><> Jan Koprowski > > > > > > > > -- > ><> Jan Koprowski > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en