> On Feb. 15, 2017, 1:41 p.m., Gastón Kleiman wrote:
> > src/tests/check_tests.cpp
> > Lines 620-625 (patched)
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/56213/diff/3/?file=1627707#file1627707line620>
> >
> >     This has the potential of being flaky on a very busy box.
> >     
> >     A more robust approach could set the grace period to MAX_INT, and make 
> > the health check pass iff a file created by the check exists.

Or does not depend on which update comes first. I'll add a TODO for now, which 
we can fix once we actually see this test being flaky.


- Alexander


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/56213/#review165568
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 16, 2017, 4:46 p.m., Alexander Rukletsov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/56213/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 16, 2017, 4:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Gastón Kleiman and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-6906
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6906
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/tests/check_tests.cpp f035c16920deaf559420ae0d7d881330ff65ae44 
>   src/tests/mesos.hpp f39e243c2c11bc1c9c757049fda2122727d1fef9 
> 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/56213/diff/7/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> See https://reviews.apache.org/r/56218/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Rukletsov
> 
>

Reply via email to