Pat Farrell wrote: > Christopher Key wrote: > >> I should probably point out that the system wasn't deliberately closed, >> the original developer simply hadn't made a concious effort to publish >> details, and I do understand than an open interface was already in the >> pipeline. >> > > > Well, it sure was when I checked two years ago. I offered to do a Linux > port, and got some long BS that other clients could not be trusted. > > Which was discouraging. Trust is not created by keeping the source > closed. But what do I know, I write security code for a living. > > > Ok, I guess things have moved on, or maybe it was because it was presented as a fait accompli. Anyway, the checksumming and disc id generation algorithms are all available in the perl source if you fancy doing a Linux version in C or similar.
Chris _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
