fred7;195656 Wrote: > it is better than re-reading and possibly getting the same error - the > rip can still be wrong but consistant
Can it? From what I have seen of damaged CDs, EAC's estimate of where the "suspect positions" are varies from rip to rip. It's close, but not identical. When you think about a scratch, it's very possible that the same drive won't be affected the same way by it twice just due to how small a pit/land is versus the optical aberration a scratch creates. The error would have to be identical down to the last single bit. What are the odds of that, even given that the "damage level" hasn't changed? I'm not trying to contradict you, I'm really just asking the question. I could be wrong here. -- Mark Lanctot ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=34232 _______________________________________________ ripping mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping
