Christopher Key wrote:
> I should probably point out that the system wasn't deliberately closed, 
> the original developer simply hadn't made a concious effort to publish 
> details, and I do understand than an open interface was already in the 
> pipeline.


Well, it sure was when I checked two years ago. I offered to do a Linux 
port, and got some long BS that other clients could not be trusted.

Which was discouraging. Trust is not created by keeping the source 
closed. But what do I know, I write security code for a living.


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html

_______________________________________________
ripping mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/ripping

Reply via email to