Norman Walsh wrote:
I also think, if we're going to do this, we should put on our asbestos underwear and assert that the PI is named "schema". Let's (a) avoid endless debate about whether it's appropriate to use this PI for non-OASIS schema languages and (b) dissuade anyone from proposing that we need ?w3c-schema and ?iso-schema, etc.
Very good point indeed. By accident I found that some of TEI folks produced similar draft that already uses <?schema PI:
http://www.tei-c.org.uk/Drafts/edw89.xml?style=printableUnfortunatelly this paper doesn't contain any information about its author. But I think that these activities should be coordinated. I'm CCing [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the case that there is no one from TEI listening.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
