>Shouldn't the group of users who need such ad-hoc mechanism have
>chance to standardize it?
Following this logic, it would never be legitimate for anyone every to
argue not to standardize anything; if anybody wants a standard we have
to have it. This makes be quite uncomfortable because there is so much
pressure on so many people to adhere to every possible standard.
>For me it is evident that there is a need for some ad-hoc mechanism.
There are ad hoc mechanisms. You want to replace the ad hoc
mechanisms with a standard.
-- Tommie
--
======================================================================
B. Tommie Usdin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301/315-9631
Suite 207 Direct Line: 301/315-9634
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML
======================================================================
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "rng-users" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
