Jirka Kosek wrote: > Would you be more comfortable with some schema association proposal if > it is named "informal community agreement" instead of "standard"?
I would be more comfortable if I knew just what community is agreeing. I would be more comfortable if I thought that anyone who is not one of the proposers would actually implement the proposal. ;-} Regretfully, the rng-users list isn't a very large community sample. We have an XML editor that has supported RELAX NG (and XML Schema) for over 18 months. We provide a way to configure which schemas are used based on namespaces, root elements or on a per-document basis, outside of documents. We have never had a user request for a processing instruction for this purpose. Conversely, XML Schema already provides a way to designate schema locations in documents, but had numerous requests to provide the means so that people do _not_ have to specify locations in their documents. Bob Foster http://xmlbuddy.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
