Mitch Amiano wrote:
> It might mitigate the concern if the PI were a nameless, minor,
> non-normative appendix attached to some other initiative. But if it is
> such a quick and ad-hoc thing, just a matter of vendors agreeing with
> one another on what they already do, why not just do it outside of a
> standards track? If EXSLT could be brought together through individual
> effort, surely a few editor vendors can agree on one PI.
Why can't we all just get along? Because we're competitors.
Maybe in some countries a few editor vendors can sit around a table and
agree on a common feature list, but not the US or any other country with
similar anti-trust regulations. Monkey-see, monkey-do is perfectly ok,
but not collusion. That's why we have standards bodies. ;-}
Bob
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
