On Friday 24 Feb 2006 10:48, Guillaume Laurent wrote: > I was thinking the same. The 'rosegarden' module was defined only as a > band-aid over our initial cvs import goofs, which we can now fix through > svn moves.
You want to handle that one? > > - commit reports to the bugs list, with diffs (I rely heavily on these > > in tracking for branch management and will certainly continue to do so) > > It would be surprising that sforge hadn't provided the same kind of > scripts they have for cvs for svn, I'll investigate. They have, I've enabled it. Don't know whether it works or not yet though. > Described here : https://sourceforge.net/docs/E09/#backup. I just > checked that it works (261Mb folks...). Ugh, five times the size of the CVS tarball -- I guess that's an uncompressed Subversion tree? I'll have a go too. rsync makes more sense in the long run, I guess. Chris ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Rosegarden-devel mailing list [email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel
