Chris Cannam wrote:
On Friday 24 Feb 2006 15:09, Guillaume Laurent wrote:
HD-based recorders aren't too expensive these days, and are the most
convenient way to record video.

True -- now -- but not exactly relevant to the original question.
Still, they do solve the problem.

Maybe you're just more relaxed than me.
Actually, I rarely watch DVDs or even TV for that matter :-). It's true that not being able to skip the intro when loading a DVD in is a pain in the neck.

Add that to much better localised seeking
Much better ? It's slow as as hell. Or maybe I don't understand what you mean by this.

Much. So far we've never had a video tape destroyed completely -- though there's still time. It's very easy to scratch a DVD so it won't play at all, e.g. by putting it in while the drawer's closing and then trying to yank it out again, or just leaving it around on the floor and letting the baby chew it a bit. It's not at all uncommon to rent DVDs and find they won't play at all either, and that's no fun when you have a demanding audience. Videos sometimes have tracking problems, but you can always get _something_ out.
OK, I always put DVDs back in their boxes, and I've never rented one so I can't tell about this (I did have bad experiences with CDs, though). But I did borrow tapes that had terrible quality.

That little catch on the end of the tape works better than you might expect.

I suppose so but you still have to manually rewind it in, haven't you ?



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Rosegarden-devel mailing list
[email protected] - use the link below to unsubscribe
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rosegarden-devel

Reply via email to