--- In [email protected], "B.T.S. - Bill & Diane Wade"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing odd here. Just the facts regarding the number of modelers
in the various scales. O scale has between 2-3 times the number of
modelers
> in S.
Hi Bill, That's precisely what make it odd. More modelers can find
room for the larger size of O scale than they can for S scale?( I've
modeled in all three scales and can't see the reasoning leading to
these skewed distribution numbers)Logically it would seem that there
would be more modelers working in the mid size scale than in the
larger scale. A linear relationship between HO, S and O scales would
be normal(if one wants something larger than HO but doesn't have the
room for O scale it would seem like S would be the popular choice)
This shunning of a most suitable size is very strange....dave
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
