It funny how things work out. My layout is set so the nominal track height
is 48", which is rounded to 73% of my 66" height. Bill's layout height is
set at 53" which is 72% of his height. My old layout had a base track
height of 42", but in one area it was 48", and I like that height the best,
so I made that the standard for the current layout. I was able to reuse the
benchwork wood from my old layout except for the legs. Most of them were too
short.
For a different perspective on layout access, I remember a comment by Frank
Titman the first time I visited his layout. You need to crawl under a piece
of his layout to operate it and he told me that when he couldn't do that
anymore it was time to stop model railroading.
I think Bob is just looking for an excuse to escape the Texas heat. I have
to agree with him on the lighting issue though.
Dave Heine
Easton, PA
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/S-Scale/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
