I think we have to leave an exact definition to the eyes and mind of the
reader/modeler. It's the same with "beautiful"--we have beautiful
models and we have beautiful models--meaning the MR calender and your
typical swimsuit calender!
Bob Werre
PhotoTraxx
On 4/22/13 10:08 PM, pickycat95 wrote:
I have an idea. Let's all learn to distinguish between Ed's rhetorical
questions and those that are truly more tangible. I can imagine the
twinkle in Ed's eyes when he throws one of his classic 'r' bombs at
the list. This was quite blatant.
Ben Trousdale
>
> What I was looking for was an answer to the question of whether
Brooks layout is scale or not. In order to answer that question, I
need to know the precise definition of 'scale'. So far, I don't hear a
really good definition. To my way of thinking, a good definition would
clearly distinguish RTR tinplate from precision authenticity in order
to prevent confusion and misunderstanding when communicating.
>
> Maybe there is no way to define 'scale' the way we S guys commonly
use it?
>
> Thinking, always thinking.....Ed Loizeaux
>
