#5249: [with patch, needs work] implicit_plot3d functionality (isosurfaces, 3d
contour plots, etc.)
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jason | Owner: was
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: sage-4.0
Component: graphics | Keywords:
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Comment(by wcauchois):
I would like to rename the "hole" parameter so that it is consistent with
me and Jason's work on #5514, which implements exclusions for parametric
3D plots. Is everybody OK with the term "region"? So the user provides a
"region" parameter which returns True for all points that should be
included. Note that this is an inversion of the logic for "hole", which
returns False for all points that should be included. We currently use
"region_function" in #5514, but I would like to change that as well to the
more concise "region".
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5249#comment:30>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of
Reinventing the Wheel
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
