#6750: [with spkg, needs review] New version of optional Group Cohomology spkg
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------
 Reporter:  SimonKing          |       Owner:  SimonKing              
     Type:  enhancement        |      Status:  assigned               
 Priority:  major              |   Milestone:                         
Component:  optional packages  |    Keywords:  cohomology ring p-group
 Reviewer:                     |      Author:  Simon King             
   Merged:                     |  
-------------------------------+--------------------------------------------

Comment(by jhpalmieri):

 Replying to [comment:27 SimonKing]:
 > How can I test whether "make -j2" is used? And what should be done
 ''if'' "make -j2 is used? Exit with an error? Sorry, I am really not an
 expert for writing shell scripts.

 Me neither, sorry.

 For the 64-bit issue, at one point I browsed through some spkgs to see
 what they did in 64-bit mode (in an attempt to solve the problem at
 #6681).  Givaro does this:
 {{{
 if [ `uname` = "Darwin" -a "$SAGE64" = "yes" ]; then
    echo "64 bit MacIntel"
    CFLAGS="-O2 -g -m64 "; export CFLAGS
    CPPFLAGS="-O2 -g -m64 "; export CPPFLAGS
    LDFLAGS="-m64"; export LDFLAGS
 fi
 }}}
 I am not an expert at this by any stretch of the imagination, but this
 kind of thing seems more or less standard for 64-bit builds in Sage spkgs;
 the -m64 flag tells the compiler to build for 64-bit architecture.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6750#comment:28>
Sage <http://sagemath.org/>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to