#9523: Upgrade the Readline spkg to 6.1
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
   Reporter:  cwitty                          |       Owner:  tbd         
       Type:  defect                          |      Status:  needs_review
   Priority:  blocker                         |   Milestone:  sage-4.6.1  
  Component:  packages                        |    Keywords:              
     Author:  David Kirkby                    |    Upstream:  N/A         
   Reviewer:  Florent Hivert, Leif Leonhardy  |      Merged:              
Work_issues:                                  |  
----------------------------------------------+-----------------------------
Changes (by newvalueoldvalue):

  * reviewer:  => Florent Hivert, Leif Leonhardy
  * author:  => David Kirkby


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:22 drkirkby]:
 > I'll make '''some''' of the changes you suggest. I will change
 {{{make}}} to {{{$MAKE}}}, but that will need '''extensive''' testing, as
 parallel builds tends to break on many packages. I'll test it 100 times on
 my reasonably quick (quad core 3.33 GHz) Sun Ultra 27, but I don't have
 time to test it extensively on every system.

 Well, I would consider changing {{{make}}} to {{{$MAKE}}} less important
 for the moment, as - as you say - ''that'' requires more testing, in
 contrast to the other changes.

 Note that e.g.
 {{{
 #!sh
 $ env MAKE="make -j" ./sage -i readline-6.1.spkg
 }}}
 (or copying the spkg to {{{spkg/standard/}}} and running {{{env MAKE="make
 -j" make}}}) would currently attempt a parallel build / install anyway,
 even though you call {{{make}}} in {{{spkg-install}}}.

 ----

 It's quite funny to enable {{{-Wall}}} in a script and at the same time
 keep blocks of unreachable code in the script itself.

 ----

 Btw, {{{ptestlong}}} passed with 4.6.rc0 on Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64 both with
 just that spkg as well as all dependent packages [re]built.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9523#comment:25>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica, 
and MATLAB

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.

Reply via email to