#11900: Serious regression caused by #9138
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Reporter: SimonKing | Owner: tbd
Type: defect | Status:
needs_review
Priority: critical | Milestone: sage-4.8
Component: performance | Keywords: categories
regression
Work_issues: | Upstream: N/A
Reviewer: Jeroen Demeyer, Nicolas M. Thiéry | Author: Simon King,
Nicolas M. Thiéry
Merged: | Dependencies: #9138
#11911
-------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Comment(by SimonKing):
I have updated the patch. It now includes the doctest fixes for the
residue fields, and in particular it runs the full test suite for residue
fields now.
One question, though: The residue field example comprises two different
kind of residue fields. The category of the first (called k in the
example) is just `Fields()`. The category of the other is the more
complicated one, with quotients etc. It could be a good idea to see why
that happens. But not here...
Apply trac11900_category_speedup_combined.patch
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11900#comment:159>
Sage <http://www.sagemath.org>
Sage: Creating a Viable Open Source Alternative to Magma, Maple, Mathematica,
and MATLAB
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-trac" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-trac?hl=en.
