Re: NeoMutt: highlight messages with attachments
Richard Russon wrote on Mon-06-Jun 16 5:36PM > Hi Eric, > > Asking NeoMutt questions on the Mutt list? You'll get me in trouble ;-) Thanks Rich and oops, sorry I have not felt the sensitivities on this issue. I hope that this will not last. > > My old `color attachment black red' does not seem to work anymore. > > I've just tried NeoMutt-2016-05-30 and Mutt-1.6.1 and both work for me. > Which are you trying to colour, index or pager? > > This will colour emails in the index: > (for a minimum of 1 attachment) > > color index black red "~X1" Sure this is what I want, I did not see it documented that the ~X needed to be followed by a count. These worked for me: color index_flags black cyan "~X1" color index_flags black red "~X2-99" I like to have only one field highlighted, though, so is it possible to have the %X field, viz the number of attachments highlighted instead of the other fields? Thanks Eric
NeoMutt: highlight messages with attachments
How do I do this? My old `color attachment black red' does not seem to work anymore. Eric
Re: header_cache for mbox
I have the same compile flags, however I opted for the hcache backend as tokyocabinet. Even with GDBM, I could not implement header caching on mbox :( In fact I thought at one time it was working with mbox as the loading was apparently faster than without the header_cache set in config. But I could not reproduce it. So is this indeed supported for mbox? It works for me consistantly with imap and with maildir. Faster and the files in the header_cache dir are uopdated. Nope on both counts with mbox. What is the reason for this? Eric ~ % mutt -v Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux 3.19.0-22-generic (i686) ncurses: ncurses 5.9.20140712 (compiled with 5.9) libidn: 1.28 (compiled with 1.28) hcache backend: tokyocabinet 1.4.48 Compiler: Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper Target: i686-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.9.2-5ubuntu1' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.9 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.9 --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-i386 --with-arch-directory=i386 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --enable-objc-gc --enable-targets=all --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=i686-linux-gnu --host=i686-linux-gnu --target=i686-linux-gnu Thread model: posix gcc version 4.9.2 (Ubuntu 4.9.2-5ubuntu1) Configure options: '--prefix=/usr' '--sysconfdir=/etc' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-docdir=/usr/share/doc' '--with-mailpath=/var/mail' '--disable-dependency-tracking' '--enable-compressed' '--enable-debug' '--enable-fcntl' '--enable-hcache' '--enable-gpgme' '--enable-imap' '--enable-smtp' '--enable-pop' '--with-curses' '--with-gnutls' '--with-gss' '--with-idn' '--with-mixmaster' '--with-sasl' '--without-gdbm' '--without-bdb' '--without-qdbm' '--build' 'i686-linux-gnu' '--enable-nntp' 'build_alias=i686-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro' 'CPPFLAGS=-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I/usr/include/qdbm' Compilation CFLAGS: -g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wall Compile options: -DOMAIN +DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE +USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_NNTP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP -USE_SSL_OPENSSL +USE_SSL_GNUTLS +USE_SASL +USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME +CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +COMPRESSED +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE -ISPELL SENDMAIL=/usr/sbin/sendmail MAILPATH=/var/mail PKGDATADIR=/usr/share/mutt SYSCONFDIR=/etc EXECSHELL=/bin/sh MIXMASTER=mixmaster To contact the developers, please mail to mutt-...@mutt.org. To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. misc/am-maintainer-mode.patch features/ifdef.patch snip Patrick Shanahan wrote on Mon-13-Jul 15 9:10PM * Heinz Diehl htd...@fritha.org [07-13-15 14:42]: On 13.07.2015, Patrick Shanahan wrote: * Eric Smith e...@fruitcom.com [07-13-15 09:17]: Has anyone implemented this or is considering to do so? Been using it for *quite* a few years now. AFAIK, mutt's header cache only works for IMAP and Maildir, but not for the mbox format. Guess more research is warranted. I have used mbox for 10 years and header_cache since implementation on openSUSE. user:~ mutt -v Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: Linux
header_cache for mbox
Has anyone implemented this or is considering to do so? -- Eric Smith
Length of attachment title string in Compose window
Hi Where do I control the length of the string for the title of the attachment which is displayed in the Compose window? -- Eric Smith
Re: highlight URL in pager
Thanks for this Marco. For some reason my version 1.5.21 did not expand the char class square brackets so I had to change the regex thusly; color body brightgreen black (http|https|ftp|news|telnet|finger)://[^ \\t\r\n]* -- Eric Smith Marco wrote on Wed-21-Aug 13 5:12PM On 2013–08–21 Eric Smith wrote: How do I highlight URL's in the mutt pager? I use the following settings (I don't remember from which blog I stole them) # URLs color body brightgreen black (http[s]|ftp|news|telnet|finger)://[^ \\t\r\n]* color body brightgreen black mailto:[-a-z_0-9.]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+; mono body bold (http[s]|ftp|news|telnet|finger)://[^ \\t\r\n]* mono body bold mailto:[-a-z_0-9.]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+; # email addresses color body brightgreen black [-a-z_0-9.%$]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+\\.[-a-z][-a-z]+ mono body bold [-a-z_0-9.%$]+@[-a-z_0-9.]+\\.[-a-z][-a-z]+ Marco
highlight URL in pager
How do I highlight URL's in the mutt pager? -- Eric Smith
Re: rendering color in html emails inside mutt
Stefan Wimmer wrote on Sat-09-Feb 13 10:57PM * Brendan Cully bren...@kublai.com [2013-02-09 22:38]: On Saturday, 09 February 2013 at 13:27, Gary Johnson wrote: On 2013-02-09, Brendan Cully wrote: Elinks does work fine to view attachments in color. You can't get color when autoviewing though -- in this case, the elinks output is recolorized by the pager using color body rules, which mangle the underlying color. Even if allow_ansi is set? Yes, on my system at least, the first character of the line is colored but the rest are clobbered, in autoview mode. When I switch to view-attachment mode, everything looks fine. With allow_ansi unset, not even the first character is colored. You could give '-dump-color-mode 3' a try - it works quite good but you'll be in trouble if you try to print those HTML-messages ... ;-) Thank you for all your suggestions. The closest I get is the first character displaying as red but only with elinks -dump-color-mode 1. If this setting is set to any of the higher values then the foreground and background of the *all* text is set to grey (unreadable therefore). I guess the first char highlighted is a good enough solution. -- Eric Smith
rendering color in html emails inside mutt
Hi. (For those deeply offended by manifestations of html in emails, please look away now). I mainly receive email from non-technical people. Recently, while in the chaos ahead of a deadline I missed some important email where answers to my questions where inserted inline in a red color. I have never managed to render color in html email, how is this possible? Thanks -- Eric Smith
Change the header Attach: to Attached:
Is there a non sourcecode way to change mutt's interpretation of the header named Attach: to an arbitrary string (like Attached:)? -- Eric Smith
Re: Change the header Attach: to Attached:
So when I write emails I refer to the attachments. I copy and paste the list of headers as a block like this; Attach: Foobar.baz Attach: Foobar_1.baz Attach: Foobar_2.baz into my text and reference them in a way that it is more professional and grammatical to say Attached rather than Attach -- Eric Smith Christian Brabandt wrote on Tue-20-Nov 12 5:02PM On Tue, November 20, 2012 16:59, Eric Smith wrote: Is there a non sourcecode way to change mutt's interpretation of the header named Attach: to an arbitrary string (like Attached:)? I don't think there is. Why? regards, Christian
Re: Change the header Attach: to Attached:
No Christian, perhpas it not clear enough. If course they are pseudo headers. So in my vim when composing (usually large) emails. I develop a collection of *pseudo* headers like in the block below. Then I copy and paste these in the text with descriptions and comments relevant to each header. So I want to copy and paste a grammatically more useful *pseudo* header text. Of course mutt could be made to accept anything unique as this pseudo header, so I asked if it is changeable without a hack of the source. Thats all. -- Eric Smith Christian Brabandt wrote on Tue-20-Nov 12 5:12PM On Tue, November 20, 2012 17:07, Eric Smith wrote: So when I write emails I refer to the attachments. I copy and paste the list of headers as a block like this; Attach: Foobar.baz Attach: Foobar_1.baz Attach: Foobar_2.baz into my text and reference them in a way that it is more professional and grammatical to say Attached rather than Attach Well, we are talking about a pseudo-header here. It is not visible in your mail and only used by mutt internally to detect which files need to be attached. Those headers won't end up in your sent mail. So you can consider it as a request to mutt to simply Attach those files. regards, Christian
coloured threads
I am coming across more and more (non techy) html email with colouring of threads. We, do fine with our reply prefixes (`' and friends). Anyone found a nice way to deliver html mail from mutt? Never though I would ever ask such a question. -- Eric Smith
Sender name in the vim statusline
How do I get the sender's name to whom I am replying in the vim statusline? -- Eric Smith
Re: pipe headers to a file on send from compose window
Thanks Jeremy Task is to create a serialised list of Subject lines for mails posted to lists. Why? So that procmail can filter any incoming list mail by using `egrep -f' on this serialised Subject list and these (presumed) replies to my posting may then be dropped in my main inbox. I only want to extract the Subject lines mails to lists, so I will have send-hook rules for mail to these known lists. I would need to define this macro only for mails to these lists (and then define y back to send-message). (The script to which the headers are piped will also schedule an at job to strip the Subject line from the file in n days). I do something like this with postfix alwaysbcc and procmail, but would prefer something more specific and efficient. Best place to do it is at the time of send-message when the Subject line is definitive. -- Eric Smith Jeremy Kitchen wrote on Thu-08-Nov 12 2:53AM On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 12:37:27AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: When piping a message from the compose menu, I receive only the body of the mail and not its headers. I want to capture the headers before sending the mail and am using this macro. macro compose ,y pipe-entry/home/eric/bin/get_subjectentersend-message The headers are not being passed to the script get_subject. What would be the solution? I really want to say that this is because you're only piping the attachment you currently have highlighted. Now, I'm not sure how to do what you're asking for, but I think that's what's going on underneath. One question though, what are you attempting to do with this? Perhaps we can help you find a better way to do it. It seems to me you're trying to capture outgoing subject lines with a script? (just judging by the name of your script) -Jeremy
Re: pipe headers to a file on send from compose window - solution
Jeremy This is how I did it: set sendmail = /home/eric/bin/get_subject_and_send.sh $ cat /home/eric/bin/get_subject_and_send.sh #!/bin/bash cat /dev/stdin| tee (SUBJECT=`formail -z -x Subject`;echo ^Subject:.*$SUBJECT/home/eric/serialised_subjects;echo perl -ni -e \print if not /$SUBJECT/ \ /home/eric/serialised_subjects|at now +50 days | /usr/lib/sendmail -t -oem -oi -f eric.sm...@trustfood.org It passes my tests. Now I just need conditional define and undefine of the sendmail var. This is nice to use to white list mail in spam filtering. You might want to set a condition to only run the script when Subject: is longer than n chars. Eric Jeremy Kitchen wrote on Thu-08-Nov 12 7:55PM On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 10:15:45AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: Thanks Jeremy Task is to create a serialised list of Subject lines for mails posted to lists. Why? So that procmail can filter any incoming list mail by using `egrep -f' on this serialised Subject list and these (presumed) replies to my posting may then be dropped in my main inbox. I only want to extract the Subject lines mails to lists, so I will have send-hook rules for mail to these known lists. I would need to define this macro only for mails to these lists (and then define y back to send-message). (The script to which the headers are piped will also schedule an at job to strip the Subject line from the file in n days). I do something like this with postfix alwaysbcc and procmail, but would prefer something more specific and efficient. Best place to do it is at the time of send-message when the Subject line is definitive. are you using SMTP or sendmail to inject your mail? You could configure mutt to use a different sendmail which is your custom processor which also injects the message into the queue (probably by calling sendmail directly) If you're using SMTP, you could switch to using sendmail with the above mentioned wrapper and configure an external smtp client like ssmtp or such. I may be missing something, but I poked through the docs and I'm just not seeing really any other way to do it. If you find a solution, though, please let us know, I for one am interested in your idea :) -Jeremy
pipe headers to a file on send from compose window
When piping a message from the compose menu, I receive only the body of the mail and not its headers. I want to capture the headers before sending the mail and am using this macro. macro compose ,y pipe-entry/home/eric/bin/get_subjectentersend-message The headers are not being passed to the script get_subject. What would be the solution? -- Eric Smith
Keep record of mail sent with bounce-message
Is there a way to keep a record of mail that you bounce? -- Eric Smith
sync-mailbox automation
Hi Is it possible to run automatically and periodically a sync-mailbox command in mutt? This is to update the flags on the mailfolder non-interactively. -- - Eric Smith
flag for mail that is bounced
Has anyone figured a way to indicate if a mail has been bounced? (I guess a macro that first sets a flag and then bounce.) -- - Eric Smith
Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients
Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR. All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or Cc: fo the rule to apply. -- - Eric Smith Tim Gray said: On Dec 05, 2011 at 10:23 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: If a sent or received mail has a certain list of email addresses in the To: and Cc:, then I want to automatically save to a specific folder. Well, you can either string together a bunch of criteria with 'ors' and use the ~C pattern: fcc-save-hook '~C name1 | ~C name2 | ~C name3' foler_name or you can put all the addresses in a group and just use the %C pattern: fcc-save-hook '%C groupname' folder_name The first is probably more direct.
Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients
Tim Gray said: On Dec 08, 2011 at 12:08 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: Thanks Tim but the condition is AND not OR. All three addresses need to be present in random order in the To: or Oops. Just take that the |'s then. If you just place several search modifiers together, a logical AND is assumed. Thanks, but I still cannot find a pattern modifier that specifies So if it is a mail from one of three names and the other two names are in ~C (To: or Cc:), then it is a match. What is the smartest way to specify this logic with an fcc-save-hook? --- If that does not make sense, then this is the real life situation. I work independently with foo, bar and baz. So I have a folder for each. I also work collectively in a project with foo, bar and baz. When all three are in the mail headers, then I want the outgoing mails and the incoming mails to be saved to the project folder and not to the foo, bar or baz folder. Hope that makes sense. Eric Smith
Re: fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients
Yes Tim But this will not match if the mail is From: foo and To: bar, baz -- - Eric Smith Tim Gray said: On Dec 08, 2011 at 10:39 PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: So if it is a mail from one of three names and the other two names are in ~C (To: or Cc:), then it is a match. What is the smartest way to specify this logic with an fcc-save-hook? If I understand correctly, the following should do it. It's a hook that has all three recipients in the To: or CC: fields which sets the fcc/save folder to 'project_folder', followed by three individual hooks for the separate people. fcc-save-hook '~C foo ~C bar ~C baz' project_folder fcc-save-hook '~C foo' foo_folder fcc-save-hook '~C bar' bar_folder fcc-save-hook '~C baz' baz_folder It's in the order it is because hooks are matched in the order they appear in the file. So you want your group hook to match before the individual ones... otherwise the 'foo' hook would match both 'foo' only messages and the group ones.
fcc-save-hook for multiple recipients
If a sent or received mail has a certain list of email addresses in the To: and Cc:, then I want to automatically save to a specific folder. How would I implement this? -- - Eric Smith
attach multipe files from within mutt
I cannot find a way to attach multiple files in one go from within mutt. I can go to attach and then to fle browser and there select with a tag, but I cannot get all the tagged files to attch to the mail message. How would I do that? -- - Eric Smith
order mailbox by flags
I know you can filter a mailbox by flags with ~F but is it possible to order it by flags? -- - Eric Smith
abrt mail send if failed attach
If I add an Attach: heder with an invalid filename causing a failure to attach the file, is it possible to have mutt disable mail send. This often occurs when quickly exiting the editor and pressing y without noticing the failure. -- - Eric Smith
Is it possible form the command line to run a mutt macro
Hi I want mutt to startup and run imediately a macro. Is this possible? -- - Eric Smith
Re: Is it possible form the command line to run a mutt macro
Richard said: would that work? mutt -e 'push m'' Yehee, and so it does, thanks Richard.
change header attach: to something shorter
Is it possible to configure mutt to accept the header; a: attachment goes here as an alternative to attachment: attachment goes here -- - Eric Smith
view html in color
People more and more send html with their respnses in a different color :( Please let me have the maicap rule that can autodisplay these html mails in color in the pager. Thanks -- - Eric Smith
Re: do not allow mutt to send email without attchement
Ed Blackman said: echo No file was attached but a search of the message text suggests there should be one. Add a header \X-attached: none\ to override this check if no attachment is intended. For overriding, You could instead create a macro that sets the sendmail variable back to default. Then send-message and then set the sendmail back to point to the script. Then a single keypress could do the trick. Eric Smith
fcc-save-hook
I have a script that generates entries into my hooks file as follows: fcc-save-hook ~t @swypeinc\.com | ~f @swypeinc\.com +swypeinc.com Now this fails when the mail is cc'ed to me and the recipient entry appears *before* the sender's entry in the hooks file. This of course results in the file being by default saved in the mailbox of the recipient. Is there a clever way to solve this problem (without having to complicate my script to provide two entries, a ~f at the top of the file and a ~t at the bottom to enforce the precedence of ssender matching). -- - Eric Smith
change order of attachments in compose mode
Is this possible? -- - Eric Smith
Re: how to chain set editor and edit-message in a macro - solved
Michael Elkins said: Hi Eric, On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 06:06:39PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote: This and some other permutations don't work for me: macro compose J ':set editor=vim :edit-messageenter' What is the correct way to set the editor and go back to editing in one go? macro compose J 'enter-commandset editor=vimenteredit-message' Thanks Michael. I think the enter-command did it for me, its more than just a colon. After many years of exclusive vimming, I use nano for all prose that I type, so the following is a very useful addition to my config and re-sourcing to the defaults in .muttrc at the end is also cool. macro compose v 'enter-commandset editor=~/bin/mutt_edit_vimenteredit-message:source ~/.muttrcenter' macro compose n 'enter-commandset editor=~/bin/mutt_edit_nanoenteredit-message:source ~/.muttrcenter' ciao Eric PS Kudos to vim for introducing serialised undo tree - totally cool.
how to chain set editor and edit-message in a macro
Hi This and some other permutations don't work for me: macro compose J ':set editor=vim :edit-messageenter' What is the correct way to set the editor and go back to editing in one go? -- - Eric Smith
Fcc to 2 folders
How do I copy all sent mail to the send-hook specified fgolder as well as to a universal sent folder (with mutt)? -- - Eric Smith
Re: Add header automatically
Michael Ludwig said: Eric Smith schrieb am 25.06.2010 um 08:11 (+0200): Is it possible to configure mutt to place an extra header in the edit buffer each time you go into edit mode? I want the line `attach:' Yes, it is possible: add the header with a non-empty value and it'll be present in the edit buffer, no need to unignore it: my_hdr Attach: ~/empty.txt set edit_headers = yes Thanks Michael, yes that works. But effect is to send that null file each time that you do not actually want to attach a file, in which case you would edit that header and remove the placeholder filename. Guess I am just too lazy. Eric
warning if aliases do not expand
Often my mutt instance is not refreshed to read the latest mutt/aliases file so that alias expansion fails. Is it possible to warn of this bhaviour and abort mail sending. For example if a mail address does not have an @ sign, then it is an alias. This rule holds for my usage behaviour. -- - Eric Smith
Sending an inline form
How do I send an html form so that it opens as an inline form for the recipient and not an html attachment? -- - Eric Smith
auto pipe to script on viewing message with output to pager
I want to run a translation script automatically when viewing a mail in the pager. The output of the script should be displayed in the pager. What I do now is go into the attachment menu and then pipe to the script. Works perfectly but is too manual. But the automatic method should also send only the text part to the script (and pager) and only the body and not the headers although Subject: would be nice I guess. Thank you Eric Smith GOOGLE TRANSLATION com numeração à linguagem [pt] *: 1] Eu quero executar um script de tradução automática ao ver um e- mail no pager. 2] A saída do script deve ser exibido no pager. 3] O que quero fazer agora é ir para o menu de penhora e, em seguida, tubulação para o script. 4] Funciona perfeitamente, mas é muito manual. 5] Mas o método automático também deve enviar apenas uma parte do texto para o script (e pager) e apenas o corpo e não os cabeçalhos embora Assunto: seria bom eu acho. 6] Obrigado Eric Smith Original de novo na língua [en]: * 1] I want to run a translation script automatically when viewing a mail in the pager. 2] The output of the script should be displayed in the pager. 3] What I do now is go into the attachment menu and then pipe to the script. 4] Works perfectly but is too manual. 5] But the automatic method should also send only the text part to the script (and pager) and only the body and not the headers although Subject: would be nice I guess. 6] Thank you Eric Smith
Re: auto pipe to script on viewing message with output to pager
This macro which could be an autocommand of course, works okay but does not send the output to pager which I want. macro index z view-attachmentssearchtextenterpipe-entrytranslate_scriptenter -- - Eric Smith Eric Smith said: I want to run a translation script automatically when viewing a mail in the pager. The output of the script should be displayed in the pager. What I do now is go into the attachment menu and then pipe to the script. Works perfectly but is too manual. But the automatic method should also send only the text part to the script (and pager) and only the body and not the headers although Subject: would be nice I guess. Thank you Eric Smith GOOGLE TRANSLATION com numeração à linguagem [pt] *: 1] Eu quero executar um script de tradução automática ao ver um e- mail no pager. 2] A saída do script deve ser exibido no pager. 3] O que quero fazer agora é ir para o menu de penhora e, em seguida, tubulação para o script. 4] Funciona perfeitamente, mas é muito manual. 5] Mas o método automático também deve enviar apenas uma parte do texto para o script (e pager) e apenas o corpo e não os cabeçalhos embora Assunto: seria bom eu acho. 6] Obrigado Eric Smith Original de novo na língua [en]: * 1] I want to run a translation script automatically when viewing a mail in the pager. 2] The output of the script should be displayed in the pager. 3] What I do now is go into the attachment menu and then pipe to the script. 4] Works perfectly but is too manual. 5] But the automatic method should also send only the text part to the script (and pager) and only the body and not the headers although Subject: would be nice I guess. 6] Thank you Eric Smith
save in folder of all recipients including CC
Is there a patch for mutt to save mails in the folders of all To: recipients and all Cc: recipients as specified in the save-hook command? -- - Eric Smith
select most recent mail after limit command
When I open a new mailbox, the most recent mail is automatically selected. However, when I perform a limit command, the filtered list is displayed but the selected mail is the oldest. How do I have the most recent mail selected after a limit command? Thank you. -- - Eric Smith
run mail command with recipient of selected email
Is there (or should there be) a mutt command where user could run the mail command - for a *new* mail message - with the recipient taken automatically from the message selected in the index? (mutt Would select the recipient as the sender or recipient based on the alternates variable). Am I the only one that is constantly looking up mail addresses from previous emails to or from a certain contact? Of course I use my aliases file a lot as well. -- - Eric Smith
fork process on reply
When I press reply, I want to fork a new instance of mutt with that new instance then executions the editor with the replied to message and headers in place. I would do this into another screen window ideally but others might want to launch an xterm for this purpose. The advantage is to have the initial instance of mutt intact together with mailbox, filters and sorting method. doable? -- - Eric Smith
alarm when attaching xml files
I sent hundreds of pdf files for every xml file. Hoever, because of the way I generate the pdf files, I often mistakenly attach the xml source. Is there a way to configure (without source changes) mutt so that it will issue a warning or to even refuse to attach xml files? -- - Eric Smith
Re: sidebar patch - performance
I use the sidebar patch myself and the only performance problem I see with my mutt is that loading mailboxes with quite a few messages takes some time. I don't know, however, if this is related to the side bar patch. Same here.
sidebar patch - performance
My pleasure in having the sidebar patch transform the mutt user experience has just been destroyed by observing the poor performance of for example scrolling up and down the index. There seems to be some buffer overload with delayed response compared to an unpatched mutt which is much more responsive. Am I alone in experiencing this? It also seems strange to me that the sidebar feature is not seen as a high priority by the general mutt community. -- - Eric Smith
Removing Reply-To: from header list
Headers above this line are: From: Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users mutt-users@mutt.org Cc: Bcc: Subject: Removing Reply-To: from header list Reply-To: How do I prevent the Reply-To: from appearing? I have the following set set editor=vim -c '/^$/+1' -- - Eric Smith
Re: Removing Reply-To: from header list
How do I get that to work silently. My efforts with variations of: set editor=vim -c ':silent! /^Reply-To:$/d' -c '/^$/+1' all failed. -- Eric Smith Tel Amsterdam: +31 20 8080088 Original Message Christian Ebert on Thu-17-Jan 08 5:09PM . * Eric Smith on Thursday, January 17, 2008 at 11:07:13 +0100 Headers above this line are: From: Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: mutt-users mutt-users@mutt.org Cc: Bcc: Subject: Removing Reply-To: from header list Reply-To: How do I prevent the Reply-To: from appearing? I have the following set set editor=vim -c '/^$/+1' Not from within Mutt, otherwise it's a Vim question ;) Untested: set editor=vim -c '/^Reply-To:$/d' -c '/^$/+1' c -- Python Mutt utilities http://www.blacktrash.org/hg/muttils/
Re: apply filter conditions to new folder from command line - SOLVED
Eric Smith said: I am getting an error, too many arguments to push when I try: $ mutt -f l/mutt-users -e 'push limit ~d 4w' thus: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~] $ mutt -f l/mutt-users -e 'push limit ~r2w '
apply filter conditions to new folder from command line
I am getting an error, too many arguments to push when I try: $ mutt -f l/mutt-users -e 'push limit ~d 4w' -- - Eric Smith
change folder and immediately apply filter conditions to new folder
Is this possible? -- - Eric Smith
Re: change folder and immediately apply filter conditions to new
Yes but that is not the same as setting an arbitrary filter. I want to go change-folder and then when defining the new folder at the same time impose a filter condition for the task at hand. PS. After years of using mutt, I stupidly only discovered yesterday the usefulness of compound filter conditions. -- - Eric Smith Rocco Rutte said: Hi, * Eric Smith wrote: Is this possible? Yes, see folder-hook in the manual, combined with limit. Rocco
Re: change folder and immediately apply filter conditions to new
What do you mean by filter condition? If not limit... do you mean you want to filter what folders you're allowed to type in? yes, limit as in which messages to display. So i want to change to folder =foo and see only 2w From: bar
global case insensitivity on hooks
For example, I have the following hook, send-hook ~t `cat ~/recipients_list` 'set signature=... And I want the matching of everything in the recipients_list file to be case insensitive without having to specify each address in the file with a regex. Thanks -- - Eric Smith
Re: global case insensitivity on hooks
Michael
To my understanding,
this makes every address listed in the recipients_list lowercase
but does not solve the problem that in the email header, the
address might have unpredictable case.
So I want the recipe to match any case in the header.
Also, I should have added that my hook is compound viz:
send-hook ~t `cat ~/recipients_trustfood` ~C ([EMAIL PROTECTED]|.*\cl) 'set
signature=cat signature_chile ...
Thanks
--
- Eric Smith
Michael Elkins said:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:21:52AM +0100, Eric Smith wrote:
For example, I have the following hook,
send-hook ~t `cat ~/recipients_list` 'set signature=...
And I want the matching of everything in the recipients_list file
to be case insensitive without having to specify each address in
the file with a regex.
Save this script as ~/bin/hooks.sh:
#!/usr/bin/env python
for s in open('recipient_list'):
print 'send-hook ~t ' + s.lower() + ' set signature...'
In your ~/.muttrc:
source '~/bin/hooks.sh|'
(copied to http://wiki.mutt.org/?ConfigTricks)
me
execute command on all attachments
How do I from within mutt apply a command (like scp) to all the attachment in the current message? -- - Eric Smith
send-hook read recipients list form a file
Is this possible as I have a long list and multiple send-hooks? -- Eric Smith
Automatically convert spaces to underscores when saving attachment
How would I achieve this? -- Eric Smith
disable exit
How do I disable exit in mutt? So no matter what macros or keypresses, mutt does not exit. Thanks -- Eric Smith
fcc-save-hook and ignoring cc:
I prefer to use a combined fcc and save hook. These are automatically generated whenever I create a new contact. However, with the Fcc: part, when it sees a Cc address, this over-rules the To: address so the mail is saved in the folder matching the rule of the Cc: address. *Not* at all what I want. Using the ~t regex breaks the save-hook part as it always saves the mails I send in my own folder and not the recipients. What is the solution? Thanks Eric
Re: attach multiple files from command line
You could get funky with zsh viz.
files=( _chile_2007_*{626..631}*jpg _chile_2007_*{643,766,769}*JPG
some_textfile_if_you_like.txt );
mutt [EMAIL PROTECTED] {-a,$^files} -s Fotos attached
Which is the zsh way to make an array and then interpolate the -a
Original Message Christoph Berg on Tue-20-Mar 07 1:33PM
.
Re: Hein Zelle 2007-03-20 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
which gets cumbersome with 20+ files. There's a good alternative
(attaching files from within mutt), but I was wondering if anyone has
solved this before. Any clever shell scripts to add the -a option for
each of the filenames?
for f in *.png ; do a=$a -a $f ; done
mutt $a
or:
mutt `ls *.png | xargs -n1 echo -a`
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
show names of attachments in index
Is there a patch for this, that will show n number of attachments, each in a line below the main index line. Thanks Eric
delay sending mail
How do I tel mutt not to send immediately but to mail the message now +120 min or whatever? Thanks Eric
Viewing attachments with detached process while remianing in attachments menu
Like in other mail clients I just want to press on the selected attachment and view it and then go down to the next and view it. So I may open any number of the attachments at one time. To detach I am using a mailcap recipe of: image/jpg; sh -c exec display %s /dev/null 21 When I concatenate in .muttrc or on the mutt colon command line as followS: view-attach exit The viewing does not work properly, (xview no-op and display gives an X windows fiule listing option). When I just go view-attach the viewing works fine but I get plonked into the Pager and have to exit from there. How do i fix this? Is it too much to ask that this works out of the box? Ot am I missing some things? Even nicer would be an open-all-attachment macro. Thanks Eric
feature request - save_domain
.. like save_name but mutt resolves `bar' from foo.bar.com Some suggested hacks for this but IMHO, this is sufficicently useful (especially for those who deal with many companies / organisations) to be native functionality. -- Eric Smith [hoping]
fast conversion of html mail to text
I am getting a bit irritated by the second or two I need to wait for `lynx -dump' or similiar to work when viewing the _many_ html mails that happen upon my inbox - what are mutters doing to strip the tags faster? -- Eric Smith
Re: fast conversion of html mail to text - unhtml
bill luecke said: On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 03:36:49PM +0200, Eric Smith wrote: I have the following line in my .mailcap text/html; unhtml ; copiousoutput good answer - apt-get install unhtml on debian But it is still almost a second delay. I think i will try and kill this problem with procmail. -- Eric Smith
Fcc default to domain name
How would I set the default Fcc to the domain name of the recipient, omitting the tld part (.com or whatever). This would also be useful as a default save-hook. -- Eric Smith
save-message to scp
How do I create a macro that will instead of saving a file scp it to another machine? -- Eric Smith
quoting within quotes
How do I quote within a quote more than once? A specific example is that I want my default setting for $editor to be: set editor= vim -c '/^$/+1' -c 'se tw=65' Now I want to define the following macro: macro pager G :set editor=vi\ngroup-replysend-message But after executing the send-message function it should set $editor back to the default. -- Eric Smith
Re: quoting within quotes within quotes within quotes...
According to Sven Guckes on Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 07:58:28PM +0200: * Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-06-23 15:36]: How do I quote within a quote more than once? A specific example is that I want my default setting for $editor to be: set editor= vim -c '/^$/+1' -c 'se tw=65' set editor=vim -u setupfile good idea (but still wondering how one would nest commands with only `'' amd `' as quote chars - a problem not unique to mutt I know. macro pager G :set editor=vi\ngroup-replysend-message :set editor=editor_default\n or use a default hook: send-hook . 'set editor=...' I thought of this but, considered that in the macro, say there were the functions mailsend-message, then mail would prompt for recipients and the default hook would be fired over-ruling my static set editor=vi. -- Eric Smith
Re: concatenating mail and send-message in a macto
I asked this question a long time ago but today, did this macro index M maileric\nsubject\nsend-message That works just like I want - *no* need to have to press `y' in the compose screen to send your mail (which is great for many situations). But is there a way to do this _without_ having to specify a dummy name and subject at the prompts? thanx According to Eric Smith on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 11:11:24PM +0100: Sometimes I like to have the mail sent when I exit my editor - often in fact - meaning I skip the compose screen. So I used to fiddle a lit with the set editor command but that is not the answer, I just tried this: macro w index mailentersend-message and this works when you have a pending message as I did cause the enter answers the prompt to resume the postponed message, then you edit that message and voila it sends automatically on closing the editor. But when you have no pending message (as is normal for me) then the send-message ends up as a suggested subject. Am I being dense? What is the way to do this? -- Eric Smith -- Eric Smith
collapse-all read *and* unread
I have been trawling the archives and lots of discussion on this function but no answer on how to collapse regardless of whether mail is read or unread. How do I force collapse all? thanx -- Eric Smith
sending mail non-interactively with -H draft
I want to send (say from a script), the same way i may send like this: mutt whoever -ssubject/etc/passwd But with the -H and a draft that contains all the header info and a complete body, it always prompts me. Can I avoid the prompt? -- Eric Smith
including signature when mailing from the command line
Could someone suggest why this dont include the signature in the email: [eric@cherry ~] 1 $ mutt eric@localhost -s'test signature when mailing from command line'/etc/passwd -F /tmp/sig cat /tmp/sig set signature=echo Eric Smith|' Eric Smith
adding an attribution-like line for Cc's
Occasionally, I Cc an email and the recipient of the Cc assumes that the email is directed to them (and not just copied to them). Is it possible to add an attribution-like line similar to: This is a copy of an email sent to main_recipient Would be nice to have this for Bcc (and bounce) as well. A related issue I am having in connection with my hack to have a copy of _all_ mails that I send interactively with mutt in a single folder. I have this folder-hook: folder-hook . my_hdr X-outgoing: save But when I reply to an email (or forward, or bounce), then I do not get this header inserted as I want. -- Eric Smith
Re: adding an attribution-like line for Cc's
According to Charles Cazabon on Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 09:35:44AM -0600: Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 03:39:14PM +0100, Eric Smith wrote: Occasionally, I Cc an email and the recipient of the Cc assumes that the email is directed to them (and not just copied to them). Is it possible to add an attribution-like line similar to: This is a copy of an email sent to main_recipient Would be nice to have this for Bcc (and bounce) as well. It seems to me that a much better long-term solution would be to politely explain to these recipients when they make this error, the meaning of the To and Cc fields. This would also save them from making the same mistake with mail from others besides yourself. It dont seem that way to me. Email is a commercial tool, not just a techie medium. People do not (want to) squint at headers, even things obvious to you and I, like To: or Cc: If a bit of programming can make things _more_ obvious, the my view is that it is a good thing. It's also impossible to do what the original poster wants; as soon as the message differs between recipients, it's no longer a cc/bcc; it's a different message, and has to be injected separately. So inject it a second time - why all this ideology? Sendmail is light enough to be run a few times if needs be. -- Eric Smith
Re: save all outgoing messages to a common folder - implemented
According to Rob 'Feztaa' Park on Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 05:29:52PM -0700: On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 12:28:42AM +0100, Eric Smith (dis)graced my inbox with: so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail regardless of where is is fcc'ed? a simple (mutt) solution? my_hdr Bcc: Your Name Here [EMAIL PROTECTED] For those wishing to implement this - I did it this way .muttrc: my_hdr Bcc: .outgoing [EMAIL PROTECTED] my_hdr X-outgoing: save # see header to this email ;) .procmailrc: :0 c * ^X-outgoing: save .outgoing saves copy of all mail sent _with mutt_ to the.outgoing folder. Better (for me), than procmail matching on any From header. -- Eric Smith
Re: save all outgoing messages to a common folder - implemented
I must apologize for spacing out there; I apparently didn't pay any attention to the Subject: line and failed to note that you wanted to save two copies of the outgoing email. Don't worry I figured ... % % For those wishing to implement this - % I did it this way % % .muttrc: % my_hdr Bcc: .outgoing [EMAIL PROTECTED] % my_hdr X-outgoing: save # see header to this email ;) % % .procmailrc: % :0 c % * ^X-outgoing: save % .outgoing % % saves copy of all mail sent _with mutt_ to the.outgoing % folder. Better (for me), than procmail matching on any From % header. That seems pretty elegant, actually; not a bad idea. FWIW, this has come up on the list a few times before and the closest we got (with existing functionality) was to wrap sendmail and save the copy there in order to trap the bcc: headers in both (or as many as you want!) copies. Yeah I brought up a previous thread re Fcc-ing to all recipients of a mail -another thing on my wishlist and very important in userland. I do not touch sendmail.cf and am in no mood to start really. Yeah the solution that is put together above works but its wasteful: You have to send the mail (with Bcc) and fire sendmail and procmail or whatever. When you (I anyway) edit the outgoing, you have two extra - annoying - headers to stare at. - much better to do all this type of functionality without firing anything but your current mutt instance which just has to write to your local folders. I really believe that this type of functionality could easily - I aint a C programmer :( - be implemented in mutt itself BTW, people can drop the 'c' in the ':0 c' above (I had it in there cause I was testing from myself to myself. Maybe I should just be quiet now :-) Not at all. -- Eric
Re: save all outgoing messages to a common folder - implemented
According to David T-G on Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 07:52:37AM -0500: snip % When you (I anyway) edit the outgoing, you have two extra - % annoying - headers to stare at. Well, you can always ignore those away :-) yeah I use ignore and unignore but this is only for the pager - I was referring to when editing (for me in vim with edit_hdrs set). .. let me peep a few lines up in vim ... ah here ... From: Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Mutt Users' List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bcc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: save all outgoing messages to a common folder - implemented Reply-To: In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Tue, Dec 18 , 2001 at 07:52:37AM -0500 X-outgoing: save I agree, but the interesting part would be how to define it. Currently fcc-hooks are matched from top to bottom, with the last taking precedence. typical case of coders making it easy for themselves and hard on users - but when you are given so much for free and contribute so little it is hard to criticise :) anyway, when I send mail To: jack,john or even To: jack Cc: john I usually am sending the mail primarily to jack but it goes into john's folder - hey! Regarding your othe sentiments, I agree we have a _long_ way to go to make email really useful and practical - I agree re database functionality, filesystems are and will go that way, text already is with XML and mail will follow. ciao -- Eric Smith
save all outgoing messages to Fcc _and_ =sent
so that I may look in one place to check all the outgoing mail regardless of where is is fcc'ed? a simple (mutt) solution? -- Eric Smith
Re: displaying name of attachment in title bar
According to David T-G on Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 07:31:30AM -0500: Eric -- ...and then Eric Smith said... % Well I am not sure what you call that information bar above the % pager. But would it not be useful if the names of the % attachments of the current email were listed there - % or is there another view in mutt that may achieve this. You could hit 'v' to view attachments and see the entire list of them. I don't know of a way to access the name(s) of any attachment(s), though. Too fiddly and slow - with many attachment I want to scan them on the index % % You feel silly when there are things that mass mua's do, that % must cannot? No; I figure MUAs weren't supposed to do those things ;-) Well email was not originally meant to be used for commerce, nor was the entire internet for that matter. Thre are no rules (in my book) just convenience and getting things done quicker, easier, better. (Geek executives arise :) ) % % Or must I put the attachment names into the Subject: myself with % procmail/formail? That's one way to do it, as long as you don't mind trashing your subject line. If I were to try this I'd probably create an X-Attachment-List: header that I could view in the pager instead. Nah, thought of that but as I said I want it in the index line - I wont trash the Subject line just concat to it - I can also put the original Subject line into an X-Subject-orig FWIW % PS. interesting quote character ;) -- Eric Smith
Re: default directory for change-folder
According to Sven Guckes on Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 09:16:29AM +0100:
execute 2yyGp
Nothing I have seen convinces me that this is not a sufficiently
useful configurable option to make it standard.
well, how about this then:
$ cd ~/Mail; mutt
now you can save your mails *without*
any '+' or '+' - just type in the name!
why ad any code to mutt for
this simply startup method?
As I mentioned in my original mail, this has become a pain
for me - a real pain - I want to be always in my ~ dir.
Default save from mutt must be in ~ and when I want to
read something into a mail edit session or add an attachment,
9+ times out of 10 the file is in my ~ dir.
So I had enough and changed this function:
u() {
if [ $1 ]
then
mutt $@
else
cd #/data/Mail
^^^
mutt
cd -
fi
}
Changing and navigating folders is one of the most fundamental
functions of a MUA so something that makes this more convenient
by obviating a silly keypress each time can IMO, hardly be
regarded as adding a kitchen sink.
(The reading and attaching problem, may be fixed if with the set
editor command you could cd to another dir before launching your
editor).
--
Eric Smith
Re: default directory for change-folder
According to Sven Guckes on Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 11:46:29AM +0100: * Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011201 09:09]: Changing and navigating folders is one of the most fundamental functions of a MUA... or so it should be, one would think. then again, managing messages could be regarded as a database problem - and thus it's not an mua prob at all. anything could be regarded as anything but I believe my comment corresponds to current reality. so something that makes this more convenient by obviating a silly keypress each time can IMO, hardly be regarded as adding a kitchen sink. patch your own version? insert a '+' into the prompt by default? or write my own mua (or os, or ) I want to work way above that level. apt-get install mutt - with unstable keeps me on the latest version and I get on with my life (maybe that sounds selfish). (dont check the version of this mutt - its not on my deb machine). The reading and attaching problem, may be fixed if with the set editor command you could cd to another dir before launching your editor. set editor=cd /dir; edit %s ok, so you can oput this into a script and then use set editor=script.. yeah that works but dont change convenience of being in my ~ dir for: attaching in the compose screen writing out a file from an attachment or body and what about this: save-hook . + that dont help change-folder and when I just tried it now it did not work :( I still think that an option to have all folder related operations work by default on your mail $folder is practical and generally useful But thanks anyway for some extra hackery ammunition to reduce the inconvenience. Mutt istill does suck less as the author says. -- Eric Smith Fruitcom.com Benelux Phone: +31 70 313 0240 Mobile:+31 6 551 76300
default directory for change-folder
I believe that mutt should automatically prepend the value of the set-folder variable to whatever the user enters as the destination folder when issuing the change-folder command (bound by default to 'c'). To get round this I have lived with mutt being executed from my mail folder dir - but this workaround is no longer convenient for me. Also you could map macro index c change-folder= But then you lose the (partially useful) functionality of the last active folder being offered by mutt as the default. Is there something wrong with this proposal? -- Eric Smith
Re: default directory for change-folder
According to Sven Guckes on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:56:11PM +0100: * Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [011130 14:14]: At first it sounds good, but what happens if I want to change to an IMAP folder? Prepending = obviously doesn't work. Then just have a .muttrc option like Set enable_default_folder=yes for those that do not care about imap and how about another* option for those who prefer the '+'? I never figured the difference between the '+' and the '=' in this context. really - what next? :set kitchen-sink=on? Funny, when I saw who was in the ^From: line, I knew there would be a comment like this - I was right ;) folks, get real - use a macro! :macro index c change-folder+ see my original email to see why this is unsuitable (for me). Nothing I have seen convinces me that this is not a sufficiently useful configurable option to make it standard. - well I tried ... -- Eric Smith
concatenating mail and send-message in a macto
Sometimes I like to have the mail sent when I exit my editor - often in fact - meaning I skip the compose screen. So I used to fiddle a lit with the set editor command but that is not the answer, I just tried this: macro w index mailentersend-message and this works when you have a pending message as I did cause the enter answers the prompt to resume the postponed message, then you edit that message and voila it sends automatically on closing the editor. But when you have no pending message (as is normal for me) then the send-message ends up as a suggested subject. Am I being dense? What is the way to do this? -- Eric Smith
concatenating mail and send-message in a macto
Sometimes I like to have the mail sent when I exit my editor - often in fact - meaning I skip the compose screen. So I used to fiddle a lit with the set editor command but that is not the answer, I just tried this: macro w index mailentersend-message and this works when you have a pending message as I did cause the enter answers the prompt to resume the postponed message, then you edit that message and voila it sends automatically on closing the editor. But when you have no pending message (as is normal for me) then the send-message ends up as a suggested subject. Am I being dense? What is the way to do this? -- Eric Smith
concatenating mail and send-message in a macto
Sometimes I like to have the mail sent when I exit my editor - often in fact - meaning I skip the compose screen. So I used to fiddle a lit with the set editor command but that is not the answer, I just tried this: macro w index mailentersend-message and this works when you have a pending message as I did cause the enter answers the prompt to resume the postponed message, then you edit that message and voila it sends automatically on closing the editor. But when you have no pending message (as is normal for me) then the send-message ends up as a suggested subject. Am I being dense? What is the way to do this? -- Eric Smith
Fcc saving to multiple folders
Is it possible to save an outgoing to more than a single folder? Also should not (or can not) the Bcc: details be saved in the loval folder - this is useful information. thanx -- Eric Smith
two commands one a single send-hook
How do I put these two commands into a single statement? send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for processors used|' -- Eric Smith
Re: two commands one a single send-hook
According to darren chamberlain on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 08:50:15AM -0400: | Eric Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said something to this effect on 09/24/2001: | How do I put these two commands into a single statement? | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|' | | Can you separate them with semi-colons? i.e., | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|; my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' nope that dont work for me. -- Eric Smith
Re: two commands one a single send-hook
According to René Clerc on Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 03:41:57PM +0200: | * Eric Smith [24-09-2001 15:09]: | | | | How do I put these two commands into a single statement? | | | | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers |for processors used|' | | | | | | Can you separate them with semi-colons? i.e., | | | | | | send-hook ~C x[sm]l 'set signature=echo -e Eric Smith\nSee mail headers for |processors used|; my_hdr X-currently-using: xalan saxon fop xep on linux' | | nope that dont work for me. | | Why make your config files unreadable? | | I think the old situation is much more clearer, and more maintainable. | Only cause the old method as you say did not work - if it should work, I will fiddle some more. -- Eric Smith
displaying recipient in index
How do I display the recipient name in the index in the form of: To Email Recipient instead of it displaying my name in respect of emails sent by myself? -- Eric Smith
sourcing a file in a macro
I am trying to do something like this: macro index y !vim /home/eric/.muttrc\nexec source /home/eric/.muttrc The first part I have been using for years - very useful by the way especially when you have the following autocommand autocmd BufRead * normal ` (returns you to where you were in the file when last edited) Problem is I want to source the muttrc directly. how? -- Eric Smith
Re: vim / ispell
According to Will Yardley on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:09:55AM -0700: | so this is a bit off topic, but does anyone have a simple set of vim | macros to interface with ispell (or an easy way to spellcheck a file | after editing without leaving mutt)? i'm usually a decent speller but | it is annoying not to be able to check a particular word or paragraph. | My way. macro compose return :set ispell=newsbody-ispell\nispellsend-message --- #!/bin/bash ## /usr/home/eric/bin/newsbody-ispell newsbody -k from -k subject -hs -q -n $2 -p ispell -- -x %f -- The above omits headers (except subject - at least I hope it checks spelling on my subjects). So when I wish to send the mail form the compose window without checking spelling, I press the default `y', otherwise I hit enter and usually save embarrassment. Only ugliness is, once you are in spell check you have to kill the mutt process if you wish to abort the sending of the mail. Sometimes in vim you want to do a spell check interactively, I go nmap =s :!ispell -S %cr:e %cr next challenge, is to have the spell check and the auto-sending of mail automatically executed when I quit vim - tricky. Hope this helps -- Eric Smith
Re: vim / ispell
According to Will Yardley on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:09:55AM -0700: | so this is a bit off topic, but does anyone have a simple set of vim | macros to interface with ispell (or an easy way to spellcheck a file | after editing without leaving mutt)? i'm usually a decent speller but | it is annoying not to be able to check a particular word or paragraph. | My way. macro compose return :set ispell=newsbody-ispell\nispellsend-message --- #!/bin/bash ## /usr/home/eric/bin/newsbody-ispell newsbody -k from -k subject -hs -q -n $2 -p ispell -- -x %f -- The above omits headers (except subject - at least I hope it checks spelling on my subjects). So when I wish to send the mail form the compose window without checking spelling, I press the default `y', otherwise I hit enter and usually save embarrassment. Only ugliness is, once you are in spell check you have to kill the mutt process if you wish to abort the sending of the mail. Sometimes in vim you want to do a spell check interactively, I go nmap =s :!ispell -S %cr:e %cr next challenge, is to have the spell check and the auto-sending of mail automatically executed when I quit vim - tricky. Hope this helps -- Eric Smith
