--- TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> This is a city full of wealthy older men on whose
> arms are women who would never be seen with them
> except for the fact that they're wealthy.
So I've noticed. But it was not until this post that I was
inspired to buy "Diamonds are a girl's best friend" from
iTunes.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
> > --- Patrick wrote:
> > > It makes me think I'm in CC.
> >
> > Is that important to you?
>
> I'd like to be enlightened, yeah, even if it's "baby
> enlightenment." But it's a casual
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick
> Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level
> of
> > > transformation to uproot vasanas.
> >
> > Another recurrent theme of th
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
>
> --- Patrick wrote:
> > It makes me think I'm in CC.
>
> Is that important to you?
I'd like to be enlightened, yeah, even if it's "baby
enlightenment." But it's a casual desire, like my
desires for wealth and women. I'd like to have them,
but I'm not going to both
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 1/7/06 2:18 PM, a_non_moose_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Of course the humor and silliness in all of the above pales to the
> > One(s) who proclaims to BE Brahman and to see Brahamn in all things -
> > -
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "coshlnx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> --Interesting. TM and its practice is like laying bare an open > field, with trash strewn on the field needing collection and > disposal. Personally, I use various "karma busting" mantras designed > for the disposal ope
on 1/7/06 2:18 PM, a_non_moose_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Of course the humor and silliness in all of the above pales to the
> One(s) who proclaims to BE Brahman and to see Brahamn in all things -
> - and then turns around calls people "pissing skunks" and that they
> should "eat shit and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It makes me think I'm in CC.
Is that important to you?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > --- Vaj wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> > > > >> transformation to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > --- Vaj wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> > > >> transformation to uproot vasanas.
> > > >
> > > > Patrick wrote:
> > > > Another recurrent theme of this list. For
> > > --- Vaj wrote:
> > >>
> > >> IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> > >> transformation to uproot vasanas.
> > >
> > > Patrick wrote:
> > > Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to
> > > investigations into ways to uproot those vasanas. Others have
> > >
Mahesh is the Vedic Pope. Where you been?:-)On Jan 7, 2006, at 6:24 PM, coshlnx wrote:--I can just see it: the "Knights TM-Plar"...but watch out for the Pope.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Gro
--I can just see it: the "Knights TM-Plar"...but watch out for the Pope.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 1/7/06 5:12 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Would Maharishi give us a title of 'Knight'.?? 50,000-/
dollars might be
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIAL CRITERIA OF C.C.
on 1/7/06 5:12 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would Maharishi give us a title of 'Knight'.?? 50,000-/ dollars might be enough for that.??
I don’t know if he would, but you’re givin
Would Maharishi give us a title of 'Knight'.?? 50,000-/ dollars might be enough for that.?? OriginalMessage- From: "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:53:45 -0600 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re
--More specific details of the techniques mentioned below may be
found in a new book coming out in March, by Norbu Rinpoche, published
by Snow Lion Press. Contact Snow Lion in a few months.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:59 PM, a_
--Interesting. TM and its practice is like laying bare an open
field, with trash strewn on the field needing collection and
disposal. Personally, I use various "karma busting" mantras designed
for the disposal operations, namely the Mahavritunjaya mantra and a
concise form of the Surangama Ma
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIAL CRITERIA OF C.C.
on 1/7/06 3:41 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, okay. But do we each get a gold crown?
Plastic. But for a million, you get gold.
Sal
On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Praise
Yeah, okay. But do we each get a gold crown?
Sal
On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Praise not necessary, just send $2500 each. Time payments accepted, with
interest.
on 1/7/06 1:45 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> TOm T:
> It has been my experience and of a number of people that I know that
> you will deal with your stuff before but most assuredly after. The
> clarity makes it impossible to ignore any longer the stuff not de
On Jan 7, 2006, at 2:41 PM, cardemaister wrote:I mean, caturthaH praaNaayaamaH during TM kshaNika-samaadhi"destroys" samiiraNa ([movement of] praaNa), and, doing that, does the same to lots of vaasanaas! Unfortunately for this idea, the style of spontaneous pranayama that occurs in meditation is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:50 PM, sparaig wrote:Fine, but don't expect the average person to seek out the traditional texts and their commentaris."average person" being the operative word. BTW, how do you know that the texts, their commentaries are correct, or that the translations are correct?You
Anon writes: snipped
This inner-revelation effect seems consistant with what a Maharishi
pundit told me in a jyotish reading. Ironic as it sounds, I asked the
pundit about how and when I could / would find a "teacher" / guru for
personal guidance. He said that for my chart, that was not necessary
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
>
> > --- Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >> IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> >> transformation to uproot vasanas.
> >
> > Another recurrent theme of this list. For so
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:> >> > --- Vaj wrote:> > >> > > IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of > > > transformation to uproot vasanas. > > > hetud
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote: IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of transformation to uproot vasanas. Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to investigations into ways to uproot those vasanas. Others have been blacklisted
On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:59 PM, a_non_moose_ff wrote:Vaj, can you be more specific on what type of methods thjese are, or description of such.I generally would not discuss such methods. I have had specific "knowledge unfolding" in side of me, perhaps similar to what Jim is referring to, where "meth
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>> --- Vaj wrote:> >> > IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of > > transformation to uproot vasanas. hetudvayaM hi chittasya vaasanaa cha samiiraNaH .tayor vinashhTa ekasmins tad dvaav api vinashyataH ..
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no?
> >>
> >> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no?
> >>
> >> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- Vaj wrote:
> >
> > IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> > transformation to uproot vasanas.
>
> Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to
investigations into ways to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- authfriend <[EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
> >
> > > One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do
> > > was ma
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no? On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote: This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas regarding CC rather than someone's actual "expe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > --- Peter wrote:
> > >
> > > my intellectual
> > > concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
> > > largely dif
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
>
> > One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do
> > was make a connection between spiritual growth and
> > practical daily behavior. It turned out to be a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Peter wrote:
> >
> > my intellectual
> > concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
> > largely different than the author of this post and the
> > author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no?
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote:
>
> > This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
> > regarding CC rather than someone's actual "experience"
> > of CC.
>
What
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
> > > regarding CC rather than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
> regarding CC rather than someone's actual "experience"
> of CC.
Hmmm. I take it your experience of CC contradicts the following?
>
> --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTE
--- Vaj wrote:
>
> IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> transformation to uproot vasanas.
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to investigations
into ways to
uproot those vasanas. Others have been blacklisted from the TMO for making
those
investigation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's because, IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
> > transformation to uproot vasanas. Vasana-kshaya, the obliteration
Judy writes:
> I've always figured that what is called "self-
> actualization" *is* what MMY calls CC.
"Self-actualization" certainly *sounds* like the self being aware of itself,
which is one
characteristic of CC. But from what I've read of self-actualized behavior, it
simply
describes peopl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
>
> > One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do
> > was make a connection between spiritual growth and
> > practical daily behavior. It turned out to be a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Not La Antilla. I love how Jim and I have opposite
> responses to this post! (Hehehehe)
>
Peter, didn't you get the astral memo from Ramana Maharshi on "The
Strict Conformance of Enlightenened Thoughts and Actions"?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Peter wrote:
> >
> > my intellectual
> > concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
> > largely different than the author of this post and the
> > author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
>
On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do was make a connection between spiritual growth and practical daily behavior. It turned out to be a tougher connection than I ever imagined it would be. That's because, IMO, TM as a metho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
> > > regarding CC rather than
--- Peter wrote:
>
> my intellectual
> concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
> largely different than the author of this post and the
> author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
> distinctions that don't seem very relevent to CC.
Most of these 20 questions strike me as a des
--- authfriend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
> > regarding CC rather than someone's actual
> "experience"
> > of CC.
>
> Because your experience is different, or ju
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Handed out on one of the TTCs. I think La Antilla
>
> Thanks Rick! One of the best posts I've seen on FFL. Really clearly
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
> regarding CC rather than someone's actual "experience"
> of CC.
Because your experience is different, or just because
of the writing style?
---
Not La Antilla. I love how Jim and I have opposite
responses to this post! (Hehehehe)
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Handed out on one of the TTCs. I think La Antilla
>
> Thanks Rick! One o
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Handed out on one of the TTCs. I think La Antilla
Thanks Rick! One of the best posts I've seen on FFL. Really clearly
defined, well written indicators.
> 20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIAL CRITERIA OF C.C.
>
> 1) Spontane
56 matches
Mail list logo
