J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On 7 February 2015 17:25:22 CET, Dale wrote:
>> A little update on this drive for those interested. I get this now.
>> root@fireball / # smartctl --all /dev/sdd smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26
>> r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local build) Copyright (C)
>> 2002-14, Bruce Allen,
On 7 February 2015 17:25:22 CET, Dale wrote:
>Dale wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I
>been
>> using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it
>seems
>> to have issues once again.
>>
>>
>
>A little update on this drive for
Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
> using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
> to have issues once again.
>
>
A little update on this drive for those interested. I get this now.
root@fireball / # smar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 24 Jan 2015 18:18:36 Dale wrote:
>
>> Since I already replaced this drive, nothing lost. We did learn
>> something tho. Just because it claims to have fixed itself doesn't mean
>> it will be a long term solution. ;-)
>>
>>
Bob Wya wrote:
> It would be far better to use Spinrite (like I mentioned before) - to
> allow a really low level access to the drive. While Spinrite is
> running the HDD will not be able to automatically relocate sectors.
> I've been blown away how effective this piece of software is - even
> when
It would be far better to use Spinrite (like I mentioned before) - to allow
a really low level access to the drive. While Spinrite is running the HDD
will not be able to automatically relocate sectors. I've been blown away
how effective this piece of software is - even when run with (apparently)
ve
On Saturday 24 Jan 2015 18:18:36 Dale wrote:
> Since I already replaced this drive, nothing lost. We did learn
> something tho. Just because it claims to have fixed itself doesn't mean
> it will be a long term solution. ;-)
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
Your repeated dd action probably relocated som
Nils Holland wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:29:53AM -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, I have dd'd the thing a few times and ran the tests again, it
>> still gives errors. What's odd, they seem to move around. Is there a
>> bug crawling around in my drive?? lol
>>
>> # 1 Extended offlineCo
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:29:53AM -0600, Dale wrote:
> Well, I have dd'd the thing a few times and ran the tests again, it
> still gives errors. What's odd, they seem to move around. Is there a
> bug crawling around in my drive?? lol
>
> # 1 Extended offlineCompleted: read failure
Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
> using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
> to have issues once again.
>
> <>
> Since this is the 2nd time for this specific drive, thoughts?
>
> By the way, I'm doing
Dale,
As a double check I always like to test "failing" drives with Spinrite:
https://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm
If that software can't recover/access any bits of the drive - it's pretty
much a toaster in my book!
Robert
On 20 January 2015 at 17:58, Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> This is concernin
On 01/20/2015 09:58 AM, Dale wrote:
> 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 116 099 006Pre-fail
> Always - 114620384
> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 053 051 036Pre-fail
> Always - 62752
> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 088 088 000Old_age
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
to have issues once again.
root@fireball / # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdd
smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local bui
13 matches
Mail list logo