]> Raphael's proposal sounds right on the money to me.
]
]It comes down to a question of what's most annoying:
](1) having to rotate manually an unknown, but possibly quite small
]number of existing images, on a one-off basis, or
](2) having to dismiss (or find a way of permanently disabling) an
Hi,
I am new to this list and new to Gimp as well.
I have a translation issue with the most recent version (GIMP 2.2)
and would like more info, please.
While many menus and strings are correctly translated into French,
lots of others remains in the original version, English.
Are there short ter
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:32:44 +
From: "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Robert,
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
> Won't they have (already be having) exactly the same problem with any
> other EXIF-aware viewer or editor?
I doubt anyone who's encountered this issue
Hi Robert,
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Won't they have (already be having) exactly the same problem with any
other EXIF-aware viewer or editor?
I doubt anyone who's encountered this issue opening files in other
programs will have twigged that GIMP caused it :)
Raphael's proposal sounds right on the m
Will thge gimp move to tiny-fu compleately?
Kevin Cozens wrote:
Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
Where can I find a decent script-fu documentation? I mean a document
where I can find most supported functions especially string
manipulation functions (like split, chop, substring, find etc.). TIA
The Scrip
Tomasz Grobelny wrote:
Where can I find a decent script-fu documentation? I mean a document where I
can find most supported functions especially string manipulation functions
(like split, chop, substring, find etc.). TIA
The Script-Fu plug-in of GIMP uses SIOD as its Scheme interpreter. The
m
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:32:15 -0800
From: "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Raphael, glad to hear from you.
> Although I am a bit late to the party, here are my 2 cents: I
> think that the jpeg plug-in should automatically rotate the image
> when opening it without marki
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, William Skaggs wrote:
> If "Adjustable" is checked, then the shape of the rectangle can
> be modified after it has been drawn, by moving the corners in the
> same way that works for the crop tool. Once it is satisfactory,
> clicking inside the rectangle converts it into a s
Where can I find a decent script-fu documentation? I mean a document where I
can find most supported functions especially string manipulation functions
(like split, chop, substring, find etc.). TIA
Tomek
___
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@l
Hi,
I have been working on a new rectangle-select tool to meet some
of the deficiencies of the existing one, and would like to commit
what I have to cvs if it is okay.
Here is an overview of what I have currently:
The "New Rect Select" is implemented as a separate tool, which
does not conf
Raphael wrote:
> Yes to both, although the basic stuff hasn't changed much. I never
> managed to finish the code that generates the EXIF block from XMP,
> though, so that's still work-in-progress.
The most important thing is the XMP parsing/formatting code. Once
that is in place, I can help
Hi Raphael, glad to hear from you.
> Although I am a bit late to the party, here are my 2 cents: I think
> that the jpeg plug-in should automatically rotate the image when
> opening it without marking it as "dirty". The default setting should
> be to do that automatically without asking, both fo
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:31:15 +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The code is available from Raphael's web page, but it isn't in CVS,
> > and it's up to Raphael when to put it there.
>
> AFAIK the code available there is somewhat outdate
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:16:08 +0100, Gerhard Gaußling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thank you for the hint, but unfortunately there is nothing to find for
> downloading in mbox format :-(
If you haven't found any solution yet, I can send you a copy of my own
archives of this list. For 2004, that's
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:55:12 +0100, Raphaël Quinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently, each image has a "dirty" flag associated with it. In
> practice this is counter for the undo operations, but the users see it
> as a flag. Unfortunately, this is not very flexible because it cannot
> tell i
Currently, each image has a "dirty" flag associated with it. In
practice this is counter for the undo operations, but the users see it
as a flag. Unfortunately, this is not very flexible because it cannot
tell if the image data was modified or if only its metadata was
modified. I think that it c
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800, "William Skaggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Krawitz wrote:
> > [William Skaggs wrote:]
> > 4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in
> > pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into
> > standard alignment.
17 matches
Mail list logo