Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This one hast just cost me two hours, and I'm still baffled. The
story (in shorthand): was trying to integrate a positional metafun
graphic into a presentation. I got no output. I tried making a
minimal example file to reproduce the problem, and sure e
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
OK, I'm answering my own post. The plot thickens. It looks like this
has something to do with file names. It only happens when I have a
name with a period in it. Thusly, file 05.11.08.tex will not run MP
to PDF, when I copy the exact same file to 05_11_08.tex, every
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
working directory, and -- I got no output again. diff shows that both
files are identical. Looking at the logs, there's only one difference I
can spot:
Perhaps it can be that something decides that your file has the
interesting filename extension '11.08-mpgraph.mp' i
5:45 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This one hast just cost me two hours, and I'm still baffled. The
story (in shorthand): was trying to integrate a positional metafun
graphic into a presentation. I got no output. I tried making a
minimal example file to reproduce the problem, and sure
This one hast just cost me two hours, and I'm still baffled. The
story (in shorthand): was trying to integrate a positional metafun
graphic into a presentation. I got no output. I tried making a
minimal example file to reproduce the problem, and sure enough,
everything went fi
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
\defineframed[Shaped][background=Shape,frame=off,location=low]
Thanks. Still I could not get the right figure with
\setuplayer[BackLayer][direction=reverse]
Even though "direction=reverse" option was given, I got only the
Vit Zyka wrote:
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
\defineframed[Shaped][background=Shape,frame=off,location=low]
Thanks. Still I could not get the right figure with
\setuplayer[BackLayer][direction=reverse]
Even though "direction=reverse" option was giv
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
\defineframed[Shaped][background=Shape,frame=off,location=low]
Thanks. Still I could not get the right figure with
\setuplayer[BackLayer][direction=reverse]
Even though "direction=reverse" option was given, I got only the f
On Aug 13, 2005, at 1:10 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
\defineframed[Shaped][background=Shape,frame=off,location=low]
Thanks. Still I could not get the right figure with
\setuplayer[BackLayer][direction=reverse]
Even though "direction=reverse" option was given, I got only the first
figure. Means tha
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
On Aug 12, 2005, at 7:15 PM, Vit Zyka wrote:
\defineframed[Shaped][...=...]
Thanks. However what I wanted to know was the definition of \Shaped
which generates the second figure in p.145 of metafun-p.pdf (the oval
shape in the second line went to under the first oval
On Aug 12, 2005, at 7:15 PM, Vit Zyka wrote:
\defineframed[Shaped][...=...]
Thanks. However what I wanted to know was the definition of \Shaped
which generates the second figure in p.145 of metafun-p.pdf (the oval
shape in the second line went to under the first oval).
Best, ChoF
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
On Aug 11, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
StartPage .. StopPage will make a graphic as large as the current
page; dimensions are passed by context to mp, but this happens before
the graphic is drawn; so, the graphic becomes (default) a4.
just omit the StartPage .. S
On Aug 11, 2005, at 8:26 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
StartPage .. StopPage will make a graphic as large as the current
page; dimensions are passed by context to mp, but this happens
before the graphic is drawn; so, the graphic becomes (default) a4.
just omit the StartPage .. StopPage (the inner on
Jin-Hwan Cho wrote:
\startMPpage
StartPage ;
... codes in p.208 here ...
StopPage ;
\stopMPpage
In this case, the generated MPS file (ch93-1-mpgraph.1) had the bounding
box (0, 0, 420, 596).
When I used \startuseMPgraphic instead of \startMPpage, the generated
MPS file had the different boundi
The third line in the page 145 in the MetaFun manual (metafun-p.pdf)
says
The \Shaped macro was defined as:
some \inframed[background=Shape]{text} with a frame ...
some \Shaped{text} with a frame ...
It seems to be a typo. Let me know the exact definition of \Shaped
macro
I tried to generate "Figure 9.2 An example of a graphic with labels
along the axes." in metafun-p.pdf (p.209), but could get only graphics
without labels.
I used the codes in the page 208 as follows (see the attached file)
\startMPpage
StartPage ;
... codes in p.208 here ..
Jessica Holle wrote:
Hi,
I want to draw a line myself with Metafun.
This line should looks like in the module pre-05.
I've copied a few lines and try to understand what there happend.
But it failed. I've also read in the metafun.pdf, but it ist very
hard to understand.
I don
Hi,
I want to draw a line myself with Metafun.
This line should looks like in the module pre-05.
I've copied a few lines and try to understand what there happend.
But it failed. I've also read in the metafun.pdf, but it ist very
hard to understand.
I don't see the context betw
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
pstoedit now doesn't crash any more, but 'P' or 'O' for example don't
have "holes" any more. I'll try to reinstall my cygwin or to compile the
source of pstoedit on Linux later. If I understood correctly than this
patch should solve the problem and -ssp should work again.
I got the following answer from the author of pstoedit:
> Concerning your crash. I think this is related to the -ssp option -
> isn't it? Does the crash still happen without -ssp? Anyway - you could
> compile the source code yourself, e.g. under cygwin and simply apply
> the following patch.
>
>
Hi,
i did as suggested.
The Mp.tex is rendering grpahics perfectly. but the
pstoedit 3.40 seems to be having problems. it crashes
while doing the convertion.
However when I change the text "MP" to "MPL", it
crashes with the same error. but the pdf output
contains only "MP" with the last
akeMPY 1.1 - MetaFun / PRAGMA ADE 2000-2004
processing file : MP-mpgraph.mpo
tex format : context
requested texts : 1
generating : pdf file
processing aborted : invalid `texexec --batch
--once --interface=en --pdf' run
second MP run needed : text
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I believe that the version 3.33 works, but I can't find it anywhere.
i mailed you a copy yesterday (1 meg attachment) but you rmail agent may be to
picky on zip files
Hans
-
I assume you are working under windows.
You go in start -> settings -> control panel -> system -> advanced ->
environmental variables (at least under xp)
You have to chance the variable "path" and add there the path to pstoedit
Hope that helps
Wolfgang
piskala upendran wrote:
Hi all,
I
Hi all,
I have installed a fresh gs view 4.7 and pstoedit 3.40
all latest version under windows. I installed pstoedit
at H/program files/ghostgum directory.
Generated new metafun.mem and udated at
localtexmf/miktex/mem directory and texmf/web2c
directories.
MY makempy still complains about psto
with the old GS.
pstoedit 3.40 seems to work as well. I can make conversions from
postscript to metapost outside ConTeXt without any problem. Also the
posted example with metafun trickery works somehow. It crashes the
pstoedit program, but obviously pstoedit manages to produce
Hans Hagen wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless
you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does
something even though it crashes.
but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8 versions worked ok)
and pstoed
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I tried it out before reading that paragraph and I can approve: unless
you have an ancient GS, it doesn't work at all. 3.40 at least does
something even though it crashes.
but i have no problems here with gs 8.51 (all 8 versions worked ok) and pstoedit
3.33, so how recen
luigi.scarso wrote:
> hmm, try on ctan:
>
> ctan/support/pstoedit/windows
>
> It should be an older (3.31) but good version .
cited from the webpage:
New or changed in 3.32:
...
workaround to cope with a change introduced since ghostscript 7.04.
Some new operators were added to ghostscript's i
Wolfgang Zillig wrote:
Hello,
I have problems with this graphic too. First I noticed that I don't
have pstoedit installed on my computer. I downloaded version 3.40 from
http://www.pstoedit.net/pstoedit. When I now run this MP code I get a
Windows (xp) errormessage: Unhandled exception in pst
Hello,
I have problems with this graphic too. First I noticed that I don't have
pstoedit installed on my computer. I downloaded version 3.40 from
http://www.pstoedit.net/pstoedit. When I now run this MP code I get a
Windows (xp) errormessage: Unhandled exception in pstoedit.exe
(STDDRIVERS.DL
MP.tex works after downgrading to pstoedit 3.33
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> makempy --force --noclean MP-mpgraph.mpo
The last lines in the (now kept) mpy-MP-mpgraph.tmp should be
--cycle;
endfig;
end
no, again
--(144.658,2.99976)--(142.267,2.99976)..controls
(133.659,2.99976) and (133.3,4.29492)..(133.3,9.08569)
luigi.scarso wrote:
MP.tex does not work for me.
it works ok here
MP.tex:
\starttext
\startMPcode
graphictext "MP" scaled 8 outlinefill
withdrawcolor .7blue withfillcolor .7white dashed
evenly withpen
pencircle scaled 2pt ;
\stopMPcode
\stoptext
(133.659,2.99976) and (133.3,4.29492)..(13
luigi.scarso wrote:
MP.tex does not work for me.
[...]
(141.789,0.23877)..(144.658,-0.000244141)
--(144.658,2.99976)--(142.267,2.99976)..controls
(133.659,2.99976) and (133.3,4.29492)..(133.3,9.08569)
--cycle;
--cycle;
well, one of my bad day ?
Looks like it. The last li
sr/share/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ec-base.map}{/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map
/pdftex/context/ec-public-lm.map}{/usr/share/texmf/fonts/map/pdftex/context/ori
ginal-base.map}]
systems: end file MP at line 11
[flush and process MP-mpgraph.mp afterwards]
)
esky/cm/cmr12.pfb>
Output written on
> > Thanks for the hint. I never thought about installing pstoedit. I just
> > noticed long time ago that I was unable to make such fancy things, but
> > I thought I was simply to stupid to understand the manual :(.
>
> thanks for not blaming the stupid manual -)
:)
..
hello Taco,
I did search the result of all the files. All the
files are ok. except the MP-mpgraph.mpy and
MP-mpgraph.1.
The mpy shows only the
%mpochecksum : 8298
rest are all blank.
Iam also finding the error in MP-mpgraph.1
I am attaching the file.
It means both mpy and MP-mpgraph.1 fil
piskala upendran wrote:
hello Taco,
I did search the result of all the files. All the
files are ok. except the MP-mpgraph.mpy and
MP-mpgraph.1.
The mpy shows only the
%mpochecksum : 8298
rest are all blank.
Iam also finding the error in MP-mpgraph.1
I am attaching the file.
It means bo
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Thanks for the hint. I never thought about installing pstoedit. I just
noticed long time ago that I was unable to make such fancy things, but
I thought I was simply to stupid to understand the manual :(.
thanks for not blaming the stupid manual -)
However: after I someh
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
> On my linux system, I was missing the 'pstoedit' command.
> I got a blank page (well, only a page number) just like
> you, then I installed pstoedit, and now it looks fine.
>
> Taco
Thanks for the hint. I never thought about installing pstoedit. I just
noticed long time
Hi Nikolai Weibull
It was unintentional. i would better be careful in
future.
thanks.
Yahoo! Sports
Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
___
piskala upendran wrote:
[blah]
Could you perhaps choose to not send multiple copies of every message to
this list?,
nikolai
--
Nikolai Weibull: now available free of charge at http://bitwi.se/!
Born in Chicago, IL USA; currently residing in Gothenburg, Sweden.
main(){printf(&linux["\021
kpsewhich and texexec send by
mr. Hans Hagen and installed pstoedit.
updated the mem file and pdfetex.efmt using texexec
--make --alone en metafun. still the problem exits
except that the MakeMPY stopped complaining about
pstoedit is not recogonise internal or external
command. can you help me o
Hi all,
I did install the new kpsewhich and texexec send by
mr. Hans Hagen and installed pstoedit.
updated the mem file and pdfetex.efmt using texexec
--make --alone en metafun. still the problem exits
except that the MakeMPY stopped complaining about
pstoedit is not recogonise internal or
Hi all,
I did install the new kpsewhich and texexec send by
mr. Hans Hagen and installed pstoedit.
updated the mem file and pdfetex.efmt using texexec
--make --alone en metafun. still the problem exits
except that the MakeMPY stopped complaining about
pstoedit is not recogonise internal or
Hi all,
I did install the new kpsewhich and texexec send by
mr. Hans Hagen and installed pstoedit.
updated the mem file and pdfetex.efmt using texexec
--make --alone en metafun. still the problem exits
except that the MakeMPY stopped complaining about
pstoedit is not recogonise internal or
On my linux system, I was missing the 'pstoedit' command.
I got a blank page (well, only a page number) just like
you, then I installed pstoedit, and now it looks fine.
Taco
Hans Hagen wrote:
Original Message
Subject: metafun not working
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 200
Original Message
Subject: metafun not working
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 05:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: piskala upendran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi Mr. Hans,
I was trying to run the metafun example as given
below. It gave one blank pdf page.
I mov
On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 12:50 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
> that one gav eme a headache; i finally figured out that it's due to the fact
> that positions are not yet loaded (so, if you move \starttext to the top of
> your
> file, things would have worked ok)
>
> here is a patch for page-lyr.tex:
>
Richard Hirsch wrote:
Does somebody have an idea what might go wrong? Do I miss an important
setting or activation? (I am using ConTeXt ver: 2005.01.31 fmt:
2005.4.26 int: english mes: english in connection with tetex 3.0-13 on
a linux box.)
Or might this rather be a problem with the acrobat re
Dear ConTeXt users (and developers),
I am very fond of the presentation capabilites of ConTeXt, especially in
connection with the Metafun macros. A big hand for the ConTeXt team!
Now I want to link some checkboxes to a MPgraphic (a fieldstack
actually) and I thought, that the best approach would
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:20:28 +, Adam Lindsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> Replace all this preamble stuff with something that gets sent to both
> ConTeXt and MetaFun:
>
> \startMPenvironment[global]
> \enableregime[utf]
> \setupencoding[defa
VnPenguin said this at Sat, 25 Dec 2004 00:35:36 +0100:
>I'm trying the example at page 236 Graphics and macros (metafun-s.pdf).
>I use vietnamese utf-8 input with T5.:
>--- code ---
>\enableregime[utf]
>\setupencoding[default=t5]
Hi all,
I'm trying the example at page 236 Graphics and macros (metafun-s.pdf).
I use vietnamese utf-8 input with T5.:
--- code ---
\enableregime[utf]
\setupencoding[default=t5]
\loadmapfile[urwvn]
\usetypescript[all][computer-modern][t5]
\setupbodyfont[
10-04 ???:===
>Sun Minchao wrote:
>
>>
>> /Hi,/
>> //
>> /recently I've installed ConTeXt and after all the complicated
>> configurations I could finally write my first chinese text, but as I
>> tried MetaFun today, I got very strange error m
Sun Minchao wrote:
/Hi,/
//
/recently I've installed ConTeXt and after all the complicated
configurations I could finally write my first chinese text, but as I
tried MetaFun today, I got very strange error message: I tried to
compile the trivial sample on the first page of "met
Hi,
recently I've installed ConTeXt and after all the complicated
configurations I could finally write my first chinese text, but as I tried
MetaFun today, I got very strange error message: I tried to compile the trivial
sample on the first page of "metafun-p.pdf":
Hi all,
there seems to be an incompatibility between metafun's anglebetween
macro and the metaobj package. Sample input:
\startMPinclusions
input metaobj;
\stopMPinclusions
\startreusableMPgraphic{ff}
draw anglebetween(origin--(0,100),origin--(100,0),(btex $\vartheta$ etex));
\sto
+++ Hans Hagen [31/08/04 10:25 +0200]:
> Jojo wrote:
>
> >Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate
> >for that.
> >
> >
> could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable
> translation should be no problem)
Best wis
Jojo wrote:
>Would you plan to release a Chinese version? I am glad to be a volunteer translate
>for that.
>
>
could be a challenge, remind me later (once the source code of the manual is stable
translation should be no problem)
Hans
---
ishamid wrote:
Stupid question;-)
Can Metafun work with e-tex/aleph--dvipdfmx? As you know I am contemplating
actually learning meta for the Arabic project...
it will work when some bug in dvipdfmx is solved (some interference
between direct code and cm matrices); i mailed about it with Chof
+++ Brooks Moses [30/08/04 12:37 -0700]:
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Floris van Manen wrote:
> > >> I'm going to 'finish' the metafun manual, so if you have topics that
> > >> need to be covered ...
That's Great !!
>
> If yo
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 09:21:29PM +0200, Floris van Manen wrote:
> >> I'm going to 'finish' the metafun manual, so if you have topics that
> >> need to be covered ...
If you'd like volunteers to proofread the finished version, I'd be glad
to help with t
Floris van Manen wrote:
it seems that metafun has difficulty understanding the example using
no, it's tex playing tricks (# is kin dof special to tex)
thevardef [EMAIL PROTECTED] expr p = construct.
use \# instead
Floris van Manen wrote:
if i define a path
q := (w0,w0)--(w0,ww0)--(w2,ww1)--(w3,ww2)--(w3,w0)--cycle ;
and then pass this path as a parameter to a function
test( q ) ;
then within that function i can step through the 'list of points'.
def test( expr a ) =
for i = 1 upto (length(a)-2):
dotlabel.b
if i define a path
q := (w0,w0)--(w0,ww0)--(w2,ww1)--(w3,ww2)--(w3,w0)--cycle ;
and then pass this path as a parameter to a function
test( q ) ;
then within that function i can step through the 'list of points'.
def test( expr a ) =
for i = 1 upto (length(a)-2):
dotlabel.bot ("" , (point
it seems that metafun has difficulty understanding the example using
thevardef [EMAIL PROTECTED] expr p = construct.
! Illegal parameter number in definition of [EMAIL PROTECTED]@dummy2.
... p of p enddef; \par vardef [EMAIL PROTECTED
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
2.) filling-up a table
This is a more complicated example and probably "playing with TeX" may
be the only solution, but I'll ask anyway.
I need to make something similar as, say, multiplication table or a
table for dynamic programming calculation of minimum editing distance.
T
owerPoint (I never did until now) if I was forced to make something
similar in the way they did (using the same tools, tricks and complexity).
I think I would be able to solve this anyhow, but with way too much
effort and without some dirty trick. Can please someone provide me some
minimalistic exam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have made
texexec --make metafun
to generate metafun format. And it said it generated it.
But...
I always get these messages
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt metafun.mem
fmtutil: no info for format `metafun'.
texexec ---make --alone metafun
move the mem file to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yep, it seems to work...it generates metafun.mem in the same directory it
was invoked...
do I have to invoke
texexec --make --alone
in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
I have not seen anything like that mentioned in install document...
th
The output you have sent me (private mail) showed that you use the
latest ConTeXt texfiles, but the perl progam "texexec" was not
updated.
Did texexec --make --alone metafun work?
watch out: scripts are now under ../texmf*/scripts/context and no longer under ../texmf/context/ ; normally
Hi Jose,
> do I have to invoke
>
> texexec --make --alone
>
> in a specific directory to perform correct installation of ConTeXt ?
texexec --make --alone bypasses your distribution's way of installing
format files (fmtutil in your case I guess).
Put the resulting format files (*.fmt, *efmt, *mem
; are mirrors, but I don't know how uptodate they are.
>
> The output you have sent me (private mail) showed that you use the
> latest ConTeXt texfiles, but the perl progam "texexec" was not
> updated.
>
> Did texexec --make --alone metafun work?
>
&
utput you have sent me (private mail) showed that you use the
latest ConTeXt texfiles, but the perl progam "texexec" was not
updated.
Did texexec --make --alone metafun work?
Patrick
--
texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061
ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062
___
you are right...mine is 3.1
but I don't understand...I downloaded cont-tmf.zip yesterday from
pragma-ade downloading page...
is it not the right place/version?
where should I get the lattest?
thanks again !
Jose
> Hi,
>
> try texexec --alone --make metafun
>
> and your t
Hi,
try texexec --alone --make metafun
and your texexec is (as far as I can judge) far out of date.
TeXExec 4.3 - ConTeXt / PRAGMA ADE 1997-2004
is current
Patrick
--
texshow-web: http://members.ping.de:8061
ConTeXt wiki: http://members.ping.de:8062
I have made
texexec --make metafun
to generate metafun format. And it said it generated it.
But...
I always get these messages
kpathsea: Running mktexfmt metafun.mem
fmtutil: no info for format `metafun'.
when doing texexec --pdf to my tex-beauties...
it seems that he goes for met
Nigel King wrote:
I apologize in advance for asking what I am sure is a repeated
question but I cannot find the answer in manuals and archives.
In Metafun externalfigure "file.pdf" xyscale(x,y) ; how does one find
the size of a graphic in order to scale it appropriately
texexec --p
I apologize in advance for asking what I am sure is a repeated question
but I cannot find the answer in manuals and archives.
In Metafun externalfigure "file.pdf" xyscale(x,y) ; how does one find
the size of a graphic in order to scale it appropriately
TI
Hello again,
> I thought textext was just a faster version of btex ... etex and
> supposed that this would be the 'way to go', since it is a part of
> MetaFun.
I guess you know now; but for the record:
btexetex does not allow any variable part in the text to be
typeset.
Hi,
any reason you use textext here? Do you need changing labels? If not,
you should use [...] draw btex $\frac{a}{b}$ etex; [...]
I thought textext was just a faster version of btex ... etex and
supposed that this would be the 'way to go', since it is a part of
MetaFun. But I check
Hello Sebastian (sorry for sending twice; this time to the list),
> \startuseMPgraphic{test}
> draw textext("$\frac{a}{b}$");
> draw textext("$\root a \of b$");
> \stopuseMPgraphic
any reason you use textext here? Do you need changing labels? If not,
you should use
-
Hi,
Well, you should post a *complete* and *minimal* examplefile showing
your problem, together with the context/metafun version numbers (or
logfile). This way emails like the last one can be avoided and the
others can try to reproduce the problem without hassle.
okay, sorry for that. I&#x
howing
your problem, together with the context/metafun version numbers (or
logfile). This way emails like the last one can be avoided and the
others can try to reproduce the problem without hassle.
Patrick
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
Hi,
Hello Sebastian,
I don't know much about Metafun yet, but shouldn't you use math-mode
for
\root and \frac?
oops, stupid typo. The code that didn't want to compile was
textext("$\root a \of b$") and textext("$\frac{a}{b}$"), so I only
forgot the math signs
On Sun, 16 May 2004, Sebastian Sturm wrote:
> when trying to set fractions or non-square roots in Metapost figures
> using the Metafun macro textext (textext("\frac{a}{b}") or
> textext("\root a \of b")), I get the error message
>
> !Missing $ inserted.
Hi,
when trying to set fractions or non-square roots in Metapost figures
using the Metafun macro textext (textext("\frac{a}{b}") or
textext("\root a \of b")), I get the error message
!Undefined control sequence
$\setbox \rootbox \hbo
Hi,
I printed metafun-p.pdf using Preview.app on an HP Laserjet 4100 dtn
(black and white) and noticed that beginning from page 37 (physical
page number 41) of that document the output is fuzzy.
Also I noticed that it takes a much longer time to print the pages 37
onward (for instance the 14
Hi all,
We need your help in tracking down a possible bug with the
Apple Preview.app when printing the Metafun manual (pdf)
<http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/manuals/metafun-p.pdf>
from page 37 onward.
We (and Apple) would appreciate it very much if some of you would do
te
Thanks Hans, as usual perfect!
Nigel King - CTO Orthogon Systems
On 9 Jan 2004, at 23:47, Hans Hagen wrote:
At 14:01 09/01/2004, Nigel King wrote:
For the MetaFun Experts,
Section 9.2 of the MetaFun manual gives
vlogtext.bot(0, 10, 9, 10cm, "@3e") ;
The formating of the numbers is con
At 14:01 09/01/2004, Nigel King wrote:
For the MetaFun Experts,
Section 9.2 of the MetaFun manual gives
vlogtext.bot(0, 10, 9, 10cm, "@3e") ;
The formating of the numbers is controlled by "@3e". I have been trying to
find the command which control this number formating with
For the MetaFun Experts,
Section 9.2 of the MetaFun manual gives
vlogtext.bot(0, 10, 9, 10cm, "@3e") ;
The formating of the numbers is controlled by "@3e". I have been trying
to find the command which control this number formating without
success. Please could somebody p
n other computer and I:
- get 'generic basic' type of installation (with pictex(2) and
langpolish)
- without any changes - works fine, but no polish characters and
metapost
- make plr fonts and metafun format - fine, but no metapost
- uncomment \useMETAFUNformattrue,
At 04:35 06/10/2003, you wrote:
Anybody has an experience with TeXLive (8 or 7) - what is the smallest
installation type for working with ConTeXt and (absolutely necessary)
MetaFun - I tried 'generic basic' and 'generic recommended' but I
can't make MP graphics - I hav
^Nitram^ wrote:
Hi,
Anybody has an experience with TeXLive (8 or 7) - what is the smallest
installation type for working with ConTeXt and (absolutely necessary)
MetaFun - I tried 'generic basic' and 'generic recommended' but I
can't make MP graphics - I have a problem w
Hi,
Anybody has an experience with TeXLive (8 or 7) - what is the smallest
installation type for working with ConTeXt and (absolutely necessary)
MetaFun - I tried 'generic basic' and 'generic recommended' but I
can't make MP graphics - I have a problem with it
All,
Never mind. Found it on page 214 of the metafun manual:
\runMPgraphicstrue
At 11:58 AM 7/31/03 -0700, you wrote:
>All,
>
>I am revisiting the metafun manual. Everytime I compile with:
>
>texexec --pdf junk
>
>I have to compile a second time with
>
>texexec --p
All,
I am revisiting the metafun manual. Everytime I compile with:
texexec --pdf junk
I have to compile a second time with
texexec --pdf junk
before I can see changes to my graphics.
What can I change and where so that I will only have to compile once
1001 - 1100 of 1100 matches
Mail list logo
