Re: SOT - Removing old DLL's

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello Sir Jinx!, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 07:18:42 +0200 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:18:42 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Sir Jinx! wrote: Hello , I have two programs that need new versions of mfc42.dll and comctl.dll. But I can't remove them in

Re[2]: Found a bug

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello Syafril Hermansyah, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 13:33:34 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 1:33:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: Perhaps you right, but the O/S might be related too. Anyone who use NT Workstation having same problem (I am

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Nico Schirwing
Hello all, since it seems to be always the same stuff that you're not satisfied with I'll put my answer in one reply: IMAP, PGP integration and the editor are not perfect to you. I'm satisfied with the way they're implemented. And I'm sure they'll improve them anyway. But why DO you use The

Re: SOT - Removing old DLL's

2000-01-27 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 27 January 2000 Sir Jinx! wrote: I have two programs that need new versions of mfc42.dll and comctl.dll. But I can't remove them in _any_ known way I tried _everything_: deleting, renaming or cutting them didn't work. Even from DOS [Norton Commander] -

Re: Found a bug

2000-01-27 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello tracer, On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 15:28:45 GMT +0700 (which was 27/01/2000 15:28 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: [ Amazing, your reply looks good, congratulation to you Keith and Thomas --- who succeeded to confince you to do this ] Perhaps you right,

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:57:23 +0100, Nico Schirwing wrote: ==8 IMAP, PGP integration and the editor are not perfect to you. I'm satisfied with the way they're implemented. And I'm sure they'll improve them anyway. But why DO you use The Bat then? I guess all of you wouldn't do if

Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
Hi, I have a few hangups with the quick search facility: a) It should be invoked with a single keyboard shortcut instead of just simply hitting lettered keys with the message list in focus. b) Why not let it do searches by dynamic elimination. By this I mean, the message list only lists

Re[2]: TB and Linux?

2000-01-27 Thread Michael Frotscher
Hello Oleg, Thursday, January 27, 2000, 08:29, you wrote something about "TB and Linux?": OZ Maybe export to unix mailbox will help you to work it around? That would be, as you say, just a workaround. I will probably be working a couple of hours a day with each operating system and

Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Hello, Bat users, Well, I finally gave in to my Bat fantasies and registered this software. I'm basically a mailer collector, being the proud registered owner of Datula, EdMax, DinoX, King of Mail, Akira32Gold and other obscure programs (all reviewed on my Web site). But I've always

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo John, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:21:55 +0900 GMT (27.01.2000, 21:21 +0800 GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH always had a place in my heart for The Bat. The main problem being JDH that it doesn't do Japanese. So I arranged to have all Japanese mail JDH sent to a different account, and use

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:21:55 +0900, John De Hoog wrote: ==8 Now to my problem. I've got three accounts set up, and have set two of them to check for new messages automatically every few minutes. I have a permanent Internet connection, so no dialup problems, but for some

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:46:19 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: ==8 JDH Now to my problem. I've got three accounts set up, and have set two JDH of them to check for new messages automatically every few minutes. JDH I have a permanent Internet connection, so no dialup problems, but JDH

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Allie, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:05:15 -0500 GMT (27.01.2000, 22:05 +0800 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: AM That shouldn't have anything to do with his problem since he has a AM constant/permanent connection to the internet. Right. John, can you activate the dial-up monitor (Options/Show

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Mark Aston
Hi John, Thursday, January 27, 2000, 1:21:55 PM, you wrote: JDH Well, I finally gave in to my Bat fantasies and registered this JDH software. I'm basically a mailer collector, being the proud JDH registered owner of Datula, EdMax, DinoX, King of Mail, Akira32Gold JDH and other obscure

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:16:55 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: ==8 AM That shouldn't have anything to do with his problem since he has a AM constant/permanent connection to the internet. Right. John, can you activate the dial-up monitor (Options/Show Dial-Up Monitor/Show always) and

Re: Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Jast
Morning Allie Martin, a) It should be invoked with a single keyboard shortcut instead of just simply hitting lettered keys with the message list in focus. I have postulated this as well ;-) b) Why not let it do searches by dynamic elimination. By this I mean, the message list only lists

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Jast
Morning John De Hoog, Now to my problem. I've got three accounts set up, and have set two of them to check for new messages automatically every few minutes. I have a permanent Internet connection, so no dialup problems, but for some reason The Bat won't check for new mail automatically. I

Re[2]: SOT - Removing old DLL's

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello John Sullivan, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:39:23 + GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 6:39:23 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, John Sullivan wrote: If you select the mfc42.dll in explorer and press Alt-Enter, the version tab will tell you which version of MFC you

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:46:19 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 8:46:19 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hallo John, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:21:55 +0900 GMT (27.01.2000, 21:21 +0800 GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH

Re: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello John De Hoog, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:21:55 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Thursday, January 27, 2000, 8:21:55 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, John De Hoog wrote: Hello, Bat users, Well, I finally gave in to my Bat fantasies and registered this software. I'm basically a mailer

Re: Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:22:31 +0100, Jast wrote: ==8 b) Why not let it do searches by dynamic elimination. By this I mean, the message list only lists messages satisfying the search string and as you type each new character the list is updated. When you're finished only the messages

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 2:57:23 AM, Nico wrote: But why DO you use The Bat then? I guess all of you wouldn't do if they thought they hadn't find the best client available. Not saying the perfect one. But one that's better than the other in many points. Because it is the most

Re: Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Jast
Morning Allie Martin, I type in the quick search, 'jasper', and already a list of the message list is truncated to comprise messages with the string 'jasper' in them. I am clear about what you meant, and I'd usually prefer this functionality. The reason I'd like it to be an

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 11:45, Nico Schirwing wrote about "Re: Why do I use The Bat?": Okay, it's OT here, let's move it into private if you so wish;-) Anyhow, here's the reply: I could supply here a pretty long list of *essential* features that it doesn't support, but I won't.

Re: Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:27:42 +0100, Jast wrote: ==8 I am clear about what you meant, and I'd usually prefer this functionality. The reason I'd like it to be an option is that I sometimes want to find a message in a certain thread, and see the thread around it

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Nico Schirwing
Hello Alexander, People tend to change. Have you ever thought about it? No. There are three constants in the universe: Pi, the speed of light and I! ;-) Displaying the year of a date in two-digit format is not standard. Why??? That question was worth some billion Dollars. Well, more the

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Nico Schirwing
Hello Allie, Of course Steve had to pounce on such sweeping statements and prove them wrong, and he's right. They are wrong. :) There's just one thing left to say and that is: ;-P I guess we stop this discussion since it's obviously that the "perfect program" means something different for

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Nico Schirwing
Hello Steve, Because it is the most acceptable trade-off of a field of clients that all are flawed and, IMHO, not "perfect" in any way. I can only compare with the competitors and with what I need. That way it comes pretty close to "perfect" for me. Nico

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 10:38:53 AM, Nico wrote: No. There are three constants in the universe: Pi, the speed of light and I! ;-) Pi has changed through the years, the speed of light has been reduced in certain mediums to a point where a beat up Yugo could outrun it, and you'll fall to

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Tom Plunket
NS Displaying the year of a date in two-digit format is not standard. It NS seems pretty useless to discuss such stuff. Why not make it NS configurable if some people don't like it? My Bat shows the year with four digits. If yours doesn't, it is user configurable. Hit "Regional Settings" in

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Nico Schirwing
Hello Steve, and you'll fall to the one true constant of the universe, death. It's highly off topic but: You'll agree that, in your world view, I'll be constantly dead then. Kind of final upgrade. Right? :-) People who submit to the preview pain are beyond my comprehension. The preview pane

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:05:47 -0800, Tom Plunket wrote: ==8 My Bat shows the year with four digits. If yours doesn't, it is user configurable. Hit "Regional Settings" in the control panels and change the short date format (I recently did this due to the Y2K sort bug with Agent and

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 11:18:17 AM, Nico wrote: Is there anyone who really likes something in that program? You're always talking about what you don't like... Of course I do. What I like doesn't need improvement. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink,

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Nico Schirwing
Hello Tom, My Bat shows the year with four digits. If yours doesn't, it is user configurable. [...] Sorry, it was a comment about Pegasus. Thanks anyway for the hint! :-) Nico __ -{@

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Thursday, 27 January, 2000, 6:46:19 AM, Thomas wrote: Hallo John, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 22:21:55 +0900 GMT (27.01.2000, 21:21 +0800 GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH always had a place in my heart for The Bat. The main problem being JDH that it doesn't do

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Thursday, 27 January, 2000, 7:35:11 AM, Mark wrote: Hi John, Thursday, January 27, 2000, 1:21:55 PM, you wrote: JDH Well, I finally gave in to my Bat fantasies and registered this JDH software. I'm basically a mailer collector, being the proud JDH

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 19:38, Nico Schirwing wrote about "Re: Why do I use The Bat?": People tend to change. Have you ever thought about it? No. There are three constants in the universe: Pi, the speed of light and I! ;-) Well, there exist many more;-) m/e ratio, for one;-) As

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 10:56, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: Why do I use The Bat?": No. There are three constants in the universe: Pi, the speed of light and I! ;-) Pi has changed through the years, Steve, you are clearly worth the 0 mark in Math;-) Pi has never changed, it's

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:19:36 PM, Alexander wrote: Are you going to be cloned (uhm... let me count...) about 133,(3) times? What a heroic attempt to eternity!;-) Wanna bet? http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/01/26/1133249mode=thread -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:23:21 PM, Alexander wrote: Steve, you are clearly worth the 0 mark in Math;-) Pi has never changed, it's the people who measured it;-) Nope, it is how it has been measured through the years. Of course there is always the theory that there is a memory leak in

Re[2]: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Sebastian Ahmadi
Hello Wolfgang, Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 1:35:47 PM, you wrote: WK The solution is not to put your PGP key in every message. WK That's an absolutely annoying overhead. Put it on your WK home page and add the URL to your signature. WK And please add an signature separator "-- "

Re[2]: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Sebastian Ahmadi
Hello Nick, Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 8:26:52 PM, you wrote: NA On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 3:01:02 PM, Sebastian Ahmadi wrote: The program keeps asking me if I want to import the keyset. Well, the first time I thought that would be okay, but it does that EVERY time I am decrypting a

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:36:56 -0500, Sebastian Ahmadi wrote: ==8 Why is that an absolutely annoying overhead? PGP works best if everyone has easy access to your public key and that is the best way to do so. I don't think you have to wait more than a fraction of a second more for your

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:36:56 PM, Sebastian wrote: Why is that an absolutely annoying overhead? PGP works best if everyone has easy access to your public key and that is the best way to do so. No, it is not the best way to do so. Once they have it they don't need it again... and

Re[2]: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi, WK And please add an signature separator "-- " (dashdashenternewline) WK to your TBUDL template. Oh no, sorry, that should read dashdashblankenter of course :-( -- Regards, Wolfgang Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists Using The Bat! 1.39 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A in

Re[3]: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi, ... GCS Support for all of the PGP options. Eudora used to support these GCS (Eudora Lite still does, AFAIK, although Eudora Pro has been "broken" GCS for several versions now). And Eudora Pro with PGP support was not sold outside the US when I was looking for a new mailer in 98. So they

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Tom Plunket
Why is that an absolutely annoying overhead? PGP works best if everyone has easy access to your public key... AM Suppose everyone using PGP were to adopt your policy. 10 people like you AM would add an extra second to my download time and the time factor builds up. I agree with Allie and

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
tracer wrote... t I think under windows 2000 it will do japanese... It does chinese even t if I cannot read it t If you can send me some Japanese I can read it with the japanese fonts t snapshot them and send them back to see if it IS t japanese... The problem with Japanese is that there

Re[3]: Datula

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Keith wrote... KR On Thursday, 27 January, 2000, 7:35:11 AM, Mark wrote: Checked out Datula from the link on your site, very nice MUA, just need to learn Japanese now:-) Do you know if they plan an English interface? KR Agreed. I also enjoyed the rest of your Web site; it made me

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages automatically

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Jast wrote... The Bat won't check for new mail automatically. I have to do so manually. I can't find any setting that would affect this behavior. J What are the setting is your Options|NetworkAdministration window? It's a J wild guess, but since you have a permanent connection it might help

Re: Why do I use The Bat?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 12:42, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: Why do I use The Bat?": Steve, you are clearly worth the 0 mark in Math;-) Pi has never changed, it's the people who measured it;-) Nope, it is how it has been measured through the years. That's what I ment. Of

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 13:52, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: PGP Bug?": I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't

CNTL-F4 as reply to sender

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
You know, I just realized why this never occured to me and why I don't like using it. CNTL-F4 is the windows standard for closing a subwindow of an application. :/ -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 2:04:08 PM, Alexander wrote: I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't support yet but the

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:04:08 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't support yet

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 14:10, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: PGP Bug?": I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB

Re: CNTL-F4 as reply to sender

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:04:39 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote: You know, I just realized why this never occured to me and why I don't like using it. CNTL-F4 is the windows standard for closing a subwindow of an application. :/ Quite right, now that I've checked. In the case of TB!,

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
I wrote... JDH I have a permanent Internet connection, so no dialup problems, but JDH for some reason The Bat won't check for new mail automatically. I JDH have to do so manually. It now works properly. After setting up TheBat for the first time, I had never actually closed

Re: CNTL-F4 as reply to sender

2000-01-27 Thread Tom Plunket
SL You know, I just realized why this never occured to me and why I don't SL like using it. CNTL-F4 is the windows standard for closing a subwindow of an SL application. :/ (Yeah I pointed that out during our previous dead horse. ;) Remappable keystrokes can't come too soon! Turning

Re: CNTL-F4 as reply to sender

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 3:32:41 PM, Tom wrote: Remappable keystrokes can't come too soon! Turning off quicksearch entirely is my most desired feature (well, ok, second next to toggling virtual space)... You know, I've never seen quicksearch. *shrug* -- Steve C. Lamb

(No Subject)

2000-01-27 Thread rellieb-jean
Tom Plunket [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com To send a message to the list moderation team double click here: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe from TBUDL, double click

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 17:57, Allie Martin wrote about "Re: PGP Bug?": I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:16:31 +0900, John De Hoog wrote: It now works properly. After setting up TheBat for the first time, I had never actually closed down the program. I tried exiting and then restarting, and now it checks mail automatically just fine. Thanks for all the help. (Does this

Re: Found a bug

2000-01-27 Thread Syafril Hermansyah
Hello tracer, On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 22:28:46 GMT +0700 (which was 28/01/2000 22:28 GMT + 0700 my Local Time) you told to the list: t Syafril, haver you installed the chinese option as well? Not yet, but still in my other partision (I am dual boot, NT2000 and

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello John, On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 08:16:31 GMT +0900 (which was 3:16 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: I wrote... JDH I have a permanent Internet connection, so no dialup problems, but JDH for some reason The Bat won't check for new mail automatically. I JDH have

SOT: Win 2000 and languages (was:Re: Found a bug)

2000-01-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi Syafril, On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:21:24 +0700GMT (28/01/2000, 09:21 +0800GMT), Syafril Hermansyah wrote: t Thai works... Even in Notepad, Wordpad. Tracer, isn't your Windows Thai? g Seriously, the way I understand you (and Unicode) is that "all" languages are there in W2K. Wouldn't that be a

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Januk wrote... JA Actually this is problem that has been encountered before, but for JA some reason it never generated much useful discussion on the list. I JA guess not too many people can afford to leave their Internet JA connections on long enough to verify this bug. If you don't mind JA

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello John, On Thursday, January 27, 2000 at 13:26:22 GMT +0900 (which was 8:26 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: JA they left TB running for more than 36 hours straight, then TB would JA stop checking mail automatically. Will do. I'll get back to you in another 36 hours or

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Januk wrote... JA Just out of curiosity, about how much mail do you download in a JA typical 36 hours straight? The reason I ask is, the other person who JA complained about this bug was downloading upwards of 1000 messages a JA day. I'm wondering if perhaps The Bat encounters some upward

Re: Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Nick Andriash
On Thursday, January 27, 2000, 5:09:26 AM, Allie Martin wrote: b) Why not let it do searches by dynamic elimination. By this I mean, the message list only lists messages satisfying the search string and as you type each new character the list is updated. When you're finished only the

Re: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread Tom Plunket
JA Actually this is problem that has been encountered before, but for JA some reason it never generated much useful discussion on the list. I JA guess not too many people can afford to leave their Internet JA connections on long enough to verify this bug. JDH Will do. I'll get back to you

Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Hello, Bat users, Most email clients allow you to select just part of a message before you hit Reply, with only the selected part showing up as the quoted text. TB seems to be missing that function, or is there an easy way to do it that I haven't discovered? With Agent, Eudora, and

Re[2]: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Steve wrote... SL On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 03:30:25PM +0900, John De Hoog wrote: I tend to prefer the former approach, which is easy and more widely used. SL The problem is that it makes the assumption that if text is marked then SL you want to use it for a reply. That is not the only

Re[2]: Won't check for new messages (fixed!)

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello John De Hoog, On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:16:31 +0900 GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 28, 2000, 6:16:31 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, John De Hoog wrote: I wrote... JDH I have a permanent Internet connection, so no dialup problems, but JDH for some reason The Bat won't

Re[2]: CNTL-F4 as reply to sender

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello Tom Plunket, On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:32:41 -0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 28, 2000, 6:32:41 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Tom Plunket wrote: Remappable keystrokes can't come too soon! Turning off quicksearch entirely is my most desired feature (well, ok, second next

Re[2]: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Thomas wrote... This is what happens when I select a text portion and hit Shift-F4 -- no text gets quoted. What's it supposed to do?? -- Yours, John De Hoog, Tokyo http://wonmug.com -- -- View the TBUDL archive at

Re[2]: Found a bug

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello Syafril Hermansyah, On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:21:24 +0700 GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 28, 2000, 8:21:24 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Syafril Hermansyah wrote: Not yet, but still in my other partision (I am dual boot, NT2000 and NT4W). I am using Office2000 too, and

Re: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:30:25 +0900, John De Hoog wrote: Most email clients allow you to select just part of a message before you hit Reply, with only the selected part showing up as the quoted text. TB seems to be missing that function, or is there an easy way to do it that I haven't

Re: Thoughts on Quick Search

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:07:12 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote: That sounds like a great idea. I never played much with this applet, but with mine I notice that as I type, it seems to search for the subject, yet if I type in a name, then it will highlight the thread that contains the first message

Re: SOT: Win 2000 and languages (was:Re: Found a bug)

2000-01-27 Thread tracer
Hello Thomas Fernandez, On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 12:20:35 +0800 GMT your local time, which was Friday, January 28, 2000, 11:20:35 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Tracer, isn't your Windows Thai? g Seriously, the way I understand you (and Unicode) is that "all" languages are

Re: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi John, On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:48:06 +0900GMT (28/01/2000, 14:48 +0800GMT), John De Hoog wrote: JDH The Datula approach, though, has the advantage of letting you select JDH text, open the context menu on it and decide what to do, with one JDH option being to reply to that portion

Re: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:53:17 +0900, John De Hoog wrote: This is what happens when I select a text portion and hit Shift-F4 -- no text gets quoted. What's it supposed to do?? It did what it is supposed to: F4 - Reply quoting selected text Shift+F4 - Reply without quotation Ctrl+F4 -

Re[2]: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread John De Hoog
Allie wrote... AM That'd be F4 or right-click on the message, go to specials and it's AM there "reply quoting using selected text". That's it, F4! Thanks! This is a fine solution, and another example of how well thought out a program it is. -- Yours, John De Hoog, Tokyo http://wonmug.com

Re: Selecting quoted portion of a reply

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:07:20 +0800, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Sorry, mistake in my previous message. This is correct: shift-F4 : reply without any quotes. F4 (only): reply quoting marked text (I just used it). cntrl-F4 : reply quoting all. ^ Err.