On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:47:59AM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Is it possible that someone fixes the "Reply to:" address of this
> mailing list?
It doesn't appear broken to me.
> Now it doesn't have any "Reply to:" address, and when someone presses
> the "Reply" button in a mail client,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:37:16AM +0100, Oliver Kuhl wrote:
> Matthew Palmer wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Jose Buzon Zarzuela wrote:
> >
> >>I read about this projekt. It is pretty cool and makes the life of admins
> >>easier. But i have the
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 03:33:44PM +0100, Jose Buzon Zarzuela wrote:
> I read about this projekt. It is pretty cool and makes the life of admins
> easier. But i have the following problem:
> We have a domain without a dhcp. As far as i read to make the installation
> you need a dhcp. Is there any p
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:03:53PM +0100, Stefan Schlesinger wrote:
> Well ... since the environment should really get completeley automated,
> I don't wanna force anyone to answer any questions. Does any kind of
> switch exist, that'll turn off unattended from asking things?
Give Unattended the i
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:53:12AM -0800, Jimmy R. wrote:
> Is there an IRC channel for this mailing list?
>
> I was thinking it would perhaps give us a good method
> to help one another out and exchange configuration
> ideas and concepts.
In what way does a mailing list not "give us a good metho
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 05:57:51PM +, stephen mc murray wrote:
>I'm a student in my final year of my computer networking honers degree.
> I have decided to do my thesis on unattended installations. The initall
> research stage was simple enough (hence how I came across this forum)
> howe
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 08:25:49AM -0500, Wolfe, John wrote:
> We are working on getting an unattended installation set up by using a
> floppy disk to install from the network. Our problem is, we have
> multiple locations and servers from which an unattend can pull the
> install from. 2 things ha
On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 11:28:49AM +0200, Julien TOUCHE wrote:
> i'm looking for a way to install office2k without some part like, for
> example, access, outlook (or maybe force some extra part o install).
>
> it seems an administrative install setup take all and i've not managed
> to use Remove e
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 03:05:37PM +0200, Gerhard Hofmann wrote:
> when booting from the linux based CD, you get some message like "... if
> running from CD you can eject it now ..." which is gone some seconds
> later. Wouldn't it better to stop at this point and print a message
> "please remove
On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 04:59:37PM +0200, Tft Tco wrote:
> I want to have an unattended install with retail products where each of
> them needs / should have a separate product key.
>
> does anybody know how I can get an individual product key that is based on
> the machine name?
Yup, although
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 10:23:40PM +0200, Tft Tco wrote:
> I just tried the linux bootdisk with unattended 4.4b.
> it worked until the script wanted to mount the install share. that was the
> point when it said:
> *** Trying smbmount \\myserver.local\install /z -o
> ttl=60,username=geust,ro
>
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 04:00:58PM -0500, Michael Kahle wrote:
> What if, instead of querying a few text files under NETINST on the built
> machine for software to install and settings, we instead wrote this
> information, as well as extra information about packages already installed
> into the Win
it easier...
>
> onsdag 30. juni 2004, 03:35, skrev Matthew Palmer:
> > On (roughly) this point, would anyone be interested in Debian packages of
>
> I'm using Debian on my machines,
> and one of the things apt gets right is when a config-file has changed and
> it will
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:27:21PM -0400, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> I know, updating to new releases of Unattended is kind of a pain. I
> wonder if there is anything we can do to make it easier...
Create a clear separation of what's user-modifiable and what's not, to the
point (possibly) of cr
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 02:47:28PM +1000, jed wrote:
> Blank hard disk drive starting an unattended install why does it end up with
> "Microsoft Windows XP Professional" and
> "Pervious Operating system on c:"
> i have to manualy editing the boot.ini to get rid of it.
> Should unattended no do this
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 07:47:04PM +0200, Vincent Malguy wrote:
> I am using the dos bootdisk. I have a question, how to get rid of the
> first 2 questions before the file download ?
> The first question is not so much a problem because it has a timeout
> but the second must be answered and if i
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:10:04PM -0400, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> At least this should teach me not to make changes between -rc* and
> final in the future...
It's a lesson we all have to learn, unfortunately. My lesson would make you
wince like you'd been kicked in the nuts -- might make you
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 05:53:26PM +1000, Mangano, Aron wrote:
> 1. Is it possible that we can set up server space somewhere for users to
> contribute files such as scripts they have written, etc etc.
I'm sure I'm not the only person who could do this, but I'm willing to offer
up some HDD space /
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 12:24:13PM +0300, Anders Nystr?m wrote:
> 1, I can not get any new updates on the unattended-info page?
Can you rephrase that as an actual question?
> 2, When can we change the default server, user and password for the
> linuxboot
It is possible to set the UNC name of the
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:22:19AM -0400, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote:
> Of all the third-party modules we might consider shipping by default,
> DBI is clearly #1 on the list. I will look into adding it in the next
> release as well.
>
> How soon do you need this?
I've hacked around it for now by
I know this has been mentioned before, but I don't recall any conclusion
being reached. What disadvantages are there to using a cut-down standard
distro for the initial image? It'd certainly be a winner in situations like
the one I'm facing at the moment...
Debian has a nice command called deboo
Apparently Perl_Gthr_key_ptr is a threading thing, so it looks like the perl
in Unattended hasn't been built with thread support. Was that done for any
particular reason?
- Matt
--
[the average computer user] has been served so poorly that he expects his
system to crash all the time, and we wi
I'm trying to implement a system for unattended which takes system
information out of an SQL database (in this case, an IRM database) and uses
it for various configuration parameters for unattend.txt. Hence, I need the
DBI modules in the linux boot disk so I can go and play "query me, baby!".
I'v
For Patrick and anyone who's hit this: I think that the credentials placed
in c:\netinst\tempcred.bat shouldn't be quoted. It causes (Win2K at least)
to think that the previously empty string is, in fact, a pair of double
quotes (""). It annoys the crap out of net use, because you set your Z_USER
For people who are planning on using this, a word of warning: if you have
your z: share set up for guest access, make sure you set your z_pass to
empty. By default, the system tries to use 'guest' as the password, which
will hopefully fail on everyone's systems. Set an empty z_pass like
this:
o
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>
> > You may or may not be aware of the existence of a nice
> little webapp called
> > IRM. It can do machine, user, licence, networking
> tracking, (and soon
> > peripherals). My "dream" (called that because
> Package Management
> ***
> I was reading through the mail list archives and saw that
> package management
> is something that is needed/wanted. I agree wholeheartedly.
[...]
> good fit. Having a
> central registry of all these "packages" that we can sync to
> would be ideal.
> I'd like to be able to install some plug-ins required by some sites.
> One in particular is installed only after logging onto the site. How
> can I retrieve the installation file and install it on other computers
> without having to log into the site, preferably by a mechanism
> that doesn't nee
28 matches
Mail list logo
