Hey Gang,
I found a paper which seems to summarize the many methods for the efficient
decomposition of Hydrocarbons to H2 and carbon and carbon nanotubes - all of
which may be critical ingredients in the Flat Plate/Propane based systems that
many have had success with.
http://www.sciencedirect
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 23:40:14 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/micro-fusion-for-space-propulsion-and.html
At least two differences.
1) There is no explosion, but rather a continuous burn.
2) There is only very minimal photon production (when fre
PET theories, gotta luv 'em.
T
From the lips of Rossi,
"I am very practical: I am not at all interested to theories of “gurus”
who explain theories more or less TCL ( time-consuming-and-losing). I am
exclusively interested to apparatuses able to work. In our field we are
too much filled up with theorists who write stupiditi
See ghoulish photos:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/toddvanluling/dead-bodies-on-mount-everest
It is amazing what people will do. This is an example of the extremes they
will go to.
- Jed
Ah,
"Addressing five decades of debate, Stanford engineers determine how
collective electron oscillations, called plasmons, behave in individual
metal particles as small as just a few nanometers in diameter. This
knowledge may open up new avenues in nanotechnology ranging from solar
catal
Is it just me or does it seem that the numbers don't add up?
In SSM, COP should be infinite (or at least some ridiculously high number.)
And if he is running SSM 50% of the time, his overall COP should be
significantly higher than 6. The only way for him to get an overall COP of
6 is if his D
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 8:59 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Rossi update,
>
> "The SSM (self sustained mode) is regulated by the control system based on a
> complex interaction between parameters. The longest period can be 2 hours,
> as an average the self sustained mode runs for
Rossi update,
"The SSM (self sustained mode) is regulated by the control system based
on a complex interaction between parameters. The longest period can be 2
hours, as an average the self sustained mode runs for the 50% of the
total time. The ionizing electromagnetic emissions have no substan
Hello group,
Have a read at this blogpost from nasawatch.com (it's not a NASA website
although its name might suggest otherwise to some). While its owner has
a generally quite negative stance against LENR/CF, his questions and
their answers provided by Dennis Bushnell, LaRC Chief Scientist, ha
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 6:29 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Terry Blanton
>
> There's an anecdote that Bradbury once bet L. Ron Hubbard that he
> could not create a religion that would be recognized by the IRS. If
> true, I'm sure that Ray is paying Ron off somewhere i
I will study the BLP website and hydrino "proof" that you are alluding to,
although my reading list is quite long at this time. I am concentrating my
study on theoritical avenues that are more promising and my actual
replication attempts. Axil's charge accumulation ideas are much more
promisi
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
>Sadly I do understand, I am just not blind to the implied engineering
>requirements. *40MW/kg !* The highest power to weight machines
>(outside of bombs) that humans have ever build were the space shuttle main
>
Like Friedwart Winterberg's Supermarx concept?
http://nextbigfuture.com/2008/12/micro-fusion-for-space-propulsion-and.html
I really like the concept, but there is still no way that it can achieve
the power to weight required to give 1g at 7.5e6m/s Isp. Heat loads and
driver power requirements are
what's going on and on and on, from void to smudge to diamond...: Rich
Murray 2012.06.06
Eternal Exponential Expansion of Science
http://www.rationalskepticism.org/post1342135.html#p1342135
Thank you Chrisw, for your reasonable consideration.
I often, as an informal hobby, note all the surpris
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
There's an anecdote that Bradbury once bet L. Ron Hubbard that he
could not create a religion that would be recognized by the IRS. If
true, I'm sure that Ray is paying Ron off somewhere in that great
somewhere.
"Stranger in a Strange Land" was one
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 22:49:45 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
> That is a luxury you do not have
>with fusion in an ultra-high Isp engine.
It is also a luxury you don't need.
The trick is to perform the reaction in space itself.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.f
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Michele Comitini
wrote:
> http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/ray_bradbury_american_optimist/singleton/
There's an anecdote that Bradbury once bet L. Ron Hubbard that he
could not create a religion that would be recognized by the IRS. If
true, I'm sure that Ray is pay
Sadly I do understand, I am just not blind to the implied engineering
requirements. *40MW/kg !* The highest power to weight machines
(outside of bombs) that humans have ever build were the space shuttle main
engines, they did about 3MW/kg utilising a supply of LH2, the best possible
coolant,
In reply to Jojo Jaro's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 15:46:06 +0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Robin, let me see if I got this right.
Sorry, no.
>
>1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and
>convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in
>copious amount
http://www.salon.com/2012/06/06/ray_bradbury_american_optimist/singleton/
In reply to Robert Lynn's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:55:31 +0100:
Hi,
[snip]
You don't understand the nature of technological breakthroughs do you.
>I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
>powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of e
I didn't think it would be enough, but a story on da web said it was a
safe way to observe the transit.
harry
On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert wrote:
> I used a pair of binoculars to project the image of the transit on to a dark
> surface. With a bit of eyepiece-focusing, the transit was
This experiment is designed to see if neutrons can decay without
emitting neutrinos.
http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/13520
If neutrons can that would conflict with the standard model.
harry
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:08 PM, David Roberson wrote:
> Does anyone accept the quark model for t
Does anyone accept the quark model for the neutron? I find it hard to
reconcile anything of that nature with a three layer model.
I would think that by now with all of the super accelerators that this would be
well defined.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
To: vortex-l
Interesting to consider the possibility that bio-transmutation might
contribute to thermo-regulation (maintaining a consistent body temperature);
and what happens when one has a fever, how is that transmutation rate
throttled up and down? Do cold-blooded animals lack this transmutation
process???
Based on evidence, the neutron is believed to be comprised of positive
core surrounded by a negative shell:
http://www.terra.es/personal/gsardin/news13.htm
However in recent years there is evidence which suggests the neutron
is comprised of three layers: a central negative core which is
surrounded
The basic problem that Mills has had is in producing an attractive COP in a
commercial package. He probably has achieved this with CUHT as described on
the current website. Robin appears to seek the fusion path with a H[1/127]
pseudo-neutron. While Mills has reported spectroscopic evidence of H[1/1
Of course, we all want to eat. Before the dust settles there may be even more
species of people to feed.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Eric Walker
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 3:24 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:about Triumph Management (and LENR)
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:20 AM, A
The simple, and correct thing to do is *study*the current BLP website,
particularly the 'technical presentation', the FAQ, etc. There is more than
ample proof of the physical existence of the hydrino state listed. There is
no point in trying to create a HE version of a hydrino, although such might
Thanks Robin, I did not realize that you were starting with the molecules. Now
it adds up.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Jun 6, 2012 3:09 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mills Hyrdrino project (was :about Triumph Management (and
LENR))
In reply to David Ro
I guess one could look at a neutron as being similar to a proton plus an
electron but I am not sure that the exact analogy holds up under scrutiny. For
one thing, when a neutron decays you get more out of it than the electron and
proton. There is a pesky antineutrino and a substantial amount
I say, why waste time going to Mars, when you can shoot for the stars! We
need to set our goals and/or expectations higher or farther actually. While
it would be a very cool thing to have some fellow Humans residing on Mars,
it's getting there in a vastly improved capacity that will enable any
I'm sorry, but as an engineer if you imagine that you can build a fusion
powered spacecraft with an exhaust velocity of 7.5e6m/s and 40MW of engine
power per kg of spacecraft (from rocket equation with 20% fuel use in 2
days at 1g thrust), when nobody can yet build a viable self sustaining
fusion r
Mars One will be second anyway. ;-)
The whole story at:
http://vodo.net/pioneerone
Download for free the first 6 episodes, worth watching. If you enjoy
contribute to cover production costs of next episodes.
mic
2012/6/6 Daniel Rocha :
> Realities shows are successful because the success of o
Robin, let me see if I got this right.
1. Your machine (proposed machine) will take H2 (Hydrogen Molecule) and
convert it to Hy2 (hydrino molecule.). Theoritically you can do this in
copious amounts with an output of energy.
2. Then, you take the Hy2 molecule and split it into Hy+ and Hy+
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 00:24:05 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>I also realize there's a third species of people -- Hydrino people. I'm
>sure they want something for free too.
No, the Hydrino people want to give you some extra for the privilege. ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 03:20:33 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>I wonder if this assumption is correct.
>
>In superconductivity, you get electrons to bind together by reducing the
>temperature of the material to very low temperatures; you remove energy.
>
>The cooper pair of electro
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 02:46:07 -0400 (EDT):
Hi Dave,
[snip]
>
>Robin, I would think the velocity of the proton of the same energy as compared
>to an electron would be the square root of 2000 or 45 times slower due to the
>velocity squared relationship.
You ar
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> You might need to take energy away from the nucleus to lower its coulomb
> barrier.
>
You make an excellent point. I misstated what I meant to say -- the proton
people want to overcome Coulomb repulsion for free.
I also realize there's a thir
I wonder if this assumption is correct.
In superconductivity, you get electrons to bind together by reducing the
temperature of the material to very low temperatures; you remove energy.
The cooper pair of electrons have less energy than their precursor
quasiparticles.
You might need to take ener
In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 6 Jun 2012 02:54:53 -0400 (EDT):
Hi Dave,
[snip]
>
>I must not understand the hydrino concept very well Robin. I thought that the
>hydrinos formed by releasing energy into some other catalyst. Is this in
>error?
No, that's correct. In fact even in
To get a idea about the speed of the proton, it might be possible to make a
comparison with the speed of the neutron at various temperature. This might
be OK because the proton and the neutron are about the same size and
weight. The neutron is just a proton and an electron together…Right!
2000K
43 matches
Mail list logo
