config:
global Zone
nic / ce4
172.21.15.81/ff00
locale zone ( seperate lan with default router/firewall )
nic / ce0
172.21.39.94/ffe0
Routing Table: IPv4
Destination Gateway Flags Ref Use Interface
- - -- -
172.21.15.0 172.21.1
Hi Robert,
The Solaris format command works at the drive level. You should not be able to format only a part of
a drive, since that is all that you have been provided. You have provided all parts (via s*),
possibly, but they are individual pieces, not the whole drive as one. The label is not in
Peter Wilk wrote:
This
implies that both (all) systems in the cluster MUST be at identical
patch levels.
Yes, you want this.
Does Sun support the migration of zones from one machine to another
via this technique? Is there an official position?
A note that Sun Cluster 3.1 08/05 offers
Hi,
This procedure was changed in the release notes.
Modifying /etc/zones/index or the .xml is unsupported.
Keep in mind, that the comments in these files tell you to keep your hand off.
Kind regards
Detlef Ulherr
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:23:42AM -0400, Jason Schroeder wrote:
> Peter Wilk w
Hi
What is the impact on the use of non-global zones and trusted Solaris?
i.e. if I install trusted Solaris, are there any restrictions on the use
of non-global zones, expecially with respect to networking?
Enda
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zo
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes:
> What is the impact on the use of non-global zones and trusted Solaris?
>
> i.e. if I install trusted Solaris, are there any restrictions on the use
> of non-global zones, expecially with respect to networking?
In effect, you
Tobias Oberstein writes:
> One more Q: does stateful IPF work if I'd connect e1000g0-3 to
> a LACP-capable Switch and combine the ifcs using "Solaris 10 1/06
> link aggregation" to a logical, aggregated interface?
Yes, assuming that driver is supported for aggregation. In that case,
you'll have t
James Carlson wrote:
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes:
What is the impact on the use of non-global zones and trusted Solaris?
i.e. if I install trusted Solaris, are there any restrictions on the use
of non-global zones, expecially with respect
James Carlson wrote:
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes:
What is the impact on the use of non-global zones and trusted Solaris?
i.e. if I install trusted Solaris, are there any restrictions on the use
of non-global zones, expecially with respect to networki
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes:
> I was looking at a box this am that was setup with this scenario, and
> the non-global zones were apparently not able to see outside the box,
> they could ping the global etc, but nothing else.
> Guess that explains that then,
David,
I believe that is true for sparse zone but I thought non-global zones
are root zones unique from the global zone, So if that is true if the
customer installed the patch on the global zone and it installed on the
non-global zone, the patch would be seen on both zones...Customer is not
seeing
Hi Peter
I know that there are problems with the patch clusters at present
see bug-id
6407693 06.04.01 S10 Recommended Cluster has an incorrect patch install order
basically 119254-19 is being installed before it's required patches,
which leads to it not installing.
Possibly this might have c
James Carlson wrote:
Enda o'Connor - Sun Microsystems Ireland - Software Engineer writes:
I was looking at a box this am that was setup with this scenario, and
the non-global zones were apparently not able to see outside the box,
they could ping the global etc, but nothing else
Enda,
if you want to check here are all the files
/net/cores.central/cores/dir23/65009511
sedona% ls
* 119689-07.log.22068
118712-09.log.9307119985-02.log.8349
118822-30.log.9404121308-03.log.18339
118918-14.
Hi Peter
I will look into this on Monday, ( it evening in Ireland )
I notice that from the logs 119254-19 installs before 118712-09
But there are numerous references to also installing 119254-10 and 118712-08,
which looks incorrect to me
What setup do you have ie
FCS
update 1
what install met
mario heimel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> With traceroute from 172.16.1.101:
> instead local zone, global.zone send back the ICMP "Destination unreachable"
I have experienced the same problem but when using IPv6.
Host:
~$ uname -a
SunOS rei 5.11 snv_28 i86pc i386 i86pc
Regards
Claes Leufvén
Hey all, I was noticing that we're lacking a good wikipedia entry for
containers and/or zones. Here's a chance to contribute in a quick
and easy way-- just help improve the article! You don't even
need to make an account to make edits.
I did some minor tweaks, but it could really be expanded ni
17 matches
Mail list logo
