Great, I'm going to consider that a resounding endorsement and check it
in soon; please do let me know if you see anything odd come up.
If anyone else has been having issues with the old Transience module,
and would like to provide feedback on the newer implementation, please
get this file:
http:
Hi Chris,
Until now, we did not got any errors with new Transience.py :) It just
works, no problems found under high load.
Alex
On Mon, 1 Mar 2004, Chris McDonough wrote:
> > I installed new Transience.py. During my little test it works fine.
> > But real test will be on Monday when students
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:27, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> >Has anyone found a reasonable strategy for using Zope's test.py to test
> >products that are installed outside the Zope software home? I try
> >running it from the software home and using the --dir option to point it
> >to where my product is, b
Christian: I think I saw and fixed the problem, if your machine's local
time is GMT. Could you please cvs up the test and see if the issue is
resolved?
Thanks
Gary
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the zope
Garito wrote:
Can I know the execution contexto of an object?
I would like to know if the object is call by ZMI or DTML or Page Templates etc
is it posible?
Perhaps; I am not sure I can see why it would be *desirable*. Given
that Scripts, DTMLMethods, etc., try pretty hard to push themselves o
[Emile van Sebille]
> ...
> At this point, I won't be back to that site before next week, although
> I may take some time to test this weekend. It sounds like I should
> rework any areas that spew output to the console. Is there something
> better than checking os.path.basename(sys.executable)?
Hi all
Can I know the execution contexto of an
object?
I would like to know if the object is call by ZMI
or DTML or Page Templates etc
is it posible?
Thank you
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zo
On Monday, March 1, 2004, at 02:43 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
In order to reduce memory consumption and decouple Zope from
ZServer (and the response delivery), a large file
is spooled via a temporary.
This means, that the file content is read from ZODB, stored
in a temporary file and then delivered
That sounds possible. I added support of Python 2.3 datetime, and while
I tried to handle alternate timezones correctly I may have failed. I'll
try to look at this later today.
Gary
Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 07:06:31PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
(snip)
> I interpreted these observations in the following way:
>
> * time is dominated by the disc access
>
> * time is largely independent of the object size (if
> the object is in the OS disc cache)
>
> * ZEO overhea
Hi Christian. What are the (possibly) pertinent elements to the changes
in your sandbox?
Gary
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the zope-dev mailinglist and you have been the last ones touching code
in Products/DateIndex.
This
Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the zope-dev mailinglist and you have been the last ones touching code
in Products/DateIndex.
This test is breaking for me but not on Jeremys daily tests for Zope 2
on the HEAD:
Jeremy Hylton wrote at 2004-3-1 14:01 -0500:
> ...
>It really would be good to get to the bottom of the bad ZEO performance
>for loading an object the first time. I won't have time to do it until
>after the ZODB 3.3 release, but I think it's a worthwhile effort to
>understand what ZEO is doing.
I
Chris McDonough wrote at 2004-3-1 21:17 -0500:
>Has anyone found a reasonable strategy for using Zope's test.py to test
>products that are installed outside the Zope software home? I try
>running it from the software home and using the --dir option to point it
>to where my product is, but it tells
Ian Beatty wrote at 2004-3-1 16:38 -0500:
> ...
>Traceback (innermost last):
> ...
> Module OFS.CopySupport, line 230, in manage_renameObjects
> Module OFS.CopySupport, line 252, in manage_renameObject
>Copy Error:
>[html snipped]
Using that Zope is Open Source ;-)
and looki
Tim:
> [Thomas]
> > I get exactly the same, on Win XP Pro, both for sys.stdout and
> > sys.stderr.
>
> That's good to know! Thanks.
>
> > ...
> > Since it seems XP shows the same behaviour than win98SE, has the
> > behaviour of Python changed? Were IOErrors ignored on sys.stdout
or
> > sys.stder
Hi,
I address you directly because I haven't received feedback on this from
the zope-dev mailinglist and you have been the last ones touching code
in Products/DateIndex.
This test is breaking for me but not on Jeremys daily tests for Zope 2
on the HEAD:
==
On 2004-03-01 7:21 PM, Max M is reputed to have said:
> So if SimpleItem is before ObjectManager the traversal order of the
> parent objects will make shure that you get the wrong methods :-( So
> this will *not* work...
Aha... that explains a lot of my "irreproducible" behavior.
After correctin
[Thomas Heller]
> [I'm currently reading python-list via the gmane nntp interface, I
> don't know whether there really is a gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
> newsgroup]
I don't know either, so I'll copy you directly.
[Tim]
>> ...
>> Here's a Python program to try:
>>
>> """
>> import sys
>> if 1: # e
Thomas Heller wrote:
"Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[moving this from comp.lang.python to zope-dev; it really belongs on a
Zope list, although schemes to change what pythonw does probably belong
on python-dev]
[I'm currently reading python-list via the gmane nntp interface, I don't
kn
"Tim Peters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [moving this from comp.lang.python to zope-dev; it really belongs on a
> Zope list, although schemes to change what pythonw does probably belong
> on python-dev]
[I'm currently reading python-list via the gmane nntp interface, I don't
know whether ther
Or use this patch http://zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1233 that finds the
config file via the environment variable ZOPE_CONFIG during a normal
import Zope; app=Zope.app() dance.
-EAD
On Mar 2, 2004, at 10:52 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
Has anyone found a rea
Chris Withers wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
Has anyone found a reasonable strategy for using Zope's test.py to test
products that are installed outside the Zope software home? I try
running it from the software home and using the --dir option to point it
to where my product is, but it tells me it
[moving this from comp.lang.python to zope-dev; it really belongs on a
Zope list, although schemes to change what pythonw does probably belong
on python-dev]
[Emile van Sebille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
>> I've possibly narrowed a problem I'm having running zope as a service
>> on winxp pro sp 1 in t
I just commited a patch for DateTime.py on the Zope CVS HEAD that should
fix the problem.
-aj
--On Dienstag, 2. März 2004 12:04 Uhr +0100 Santi Camps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi all,
I'm just beginning to move my applications to Zope 2.7 and I've found
something estrange related to dates. I
Santi Camps wrote:
But the result is that with :date fields, "us" format is always used,
not following the instruction in zope.conf. Perhaps there is some
problem in Zope configuration machinery.
Yep, sounds like a bug, stick it in the collector :-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Manag
Chris McDonough wrote:
Has anyone found a reasonable strategy for using Zope's test.py to test
products that are installed outside the Zope software home? I try
running it from the software home and using the --dir option to point it
to where my product is, but it tells me it can't find any tests
Ian Beatty wrote:
I presume you mean "for cut, paste, rename, etc." If I remove
PropertyManager, my 'Properties' ZMI tab disappears.
That's odd, I could have sworn ObjectManager used that. Hmmm, maybe use Folder
instead of ObjectManager ;-)
Okay. This is bizarre. I've got a containment hierarch
Hi all,
I'm just beginning to move my applications to Zope 2.7 and I've found
something estrange related to dates. In the new zope.conf you can enable
an option: "datetime-format international"
I've enabled it hoping that fields named field_name:date will be
handled as dates in international
29 matches
Mail list logo