Jim Fulton wrote:
> Steve Alexander wrote:
I'd be happy using launchpad too. The last link points to a discussion
that didn't have any decision in the end. I wouldn't go as far as
abandoning the old collector data.
>>> Then I think we should stick with the current collector unless so
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
Sur
Steve Alexander wrote:
I'd be happy using launchpad too. The last link points to a discussion
that didn't have any decision in the end. I wouldn't go as far as
abandoning the old collector data.
Then I think we should stick with the current collector unless someone
comes forward to do the work o
Hi,
Chris Withers wrote:
> I thought the idea of a seperate field was to make it a mandatory
> dropdown so that at least we know what version of Zope the reporter is
> using...
We can know it without the drop down. Using the drop down would allow us
to query for it or to restrict the entries to
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
Sure, but it could go in
Jim Fulton wrote at 2006-12-14 07:21 -0500:
> ...
>Yawn. IMO, the collect, despite it's flaws, isn't bad enough to
>spend time on, especially given other priorities. OTOH, I'd be happy
>to just switch to using Launchpad, which would require basically no
>effort, especially if we don't bother trans
>> I'd be happy using launchpad too. The last link points to a discussion
>> that didn't have any decision in the end. I wouldn't go as far as
>> abandoning the old collector data.
>
> Then I think we should stick with the current collector unless someone
> comes forward to do the work of moving
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
>> I'm sorry to bore you with that, but I didn't notice that we had a
>> definite outcome of the last discussion.
>
> Of course not. That's what makes such discussions so tiresome.
> People have lots of ideas and complaints about easy solutions,
> like sticking with the cur
On Dec 15, 2006, at 7:37 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
...
Is it what needs to be fixed before a release?
I think "core" is largely is a meaningless label in a system, the
collector where we collect too much information already
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
> There are much more interesting things to ask them for, like
> detailed instructions on how to reproduce a problem.
Fullack.
>> Right
>> now we do that with a separate field. (In other collectors this also
>> makes it easier to query/manage the bugs.)
>
> Certainly the f
Hi,
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Christian Theune wrote:
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
> ...
Is it what needs to be fixed before a release?
>>> I think "core" is largely is a meaningless label in a system, the
>>> collector where we collect too much information already.
>> Hmm. Would that mean we should prov
Christian Theune wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
Su
Jim Fulton wrote:
> Chris Withers wrote:
>> Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
>>> it could do without the topic and version info fields.
>> Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
>> pretty useful?
>
> Sure, b
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
Sure, but it could go in the description alo
Chris Withers wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
>> The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
>> it could do without the topic and version info fields.
>
> Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
> pretty useful?
That's what I thought too.
--
g
Jim Fulton wrote:
The Zope3 collector isn't actually *that* bad in this respect. IMO,
it could do without the topic and version info fields.
Topic I'd agree with, but I would have thought version info would be
pretty useful?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python
16 matches
Mail list logo
