Re: [AFMUG] ePMP part numbers

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Chuck,

You are probably looking for C058900A112A which is the ePMP 1000 5 GHz 
Connectorized Radio with Sync.

All the ePMP part numbers are available in the Release Notes. Here’s a link to 
the latest: 
https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/file/44f10cbaf696673e19da8eff3ad2ba8e20f05750

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum

From: Af  on behalf of Chuck McCown 
Reply-To: AFMUG 
Date: Monday, August 15, 2016 at 12:48 PM
To: AFMUG 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP part numbers

If you put that in Streakwave’s search field it comes up with nothing.

From: Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 11:46 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP part numbers

Part number for model C058900P112A aka connectorized 5 ghz radio non-sync


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Chuck McCown 
> wrote:
Can anyone tell me exactly what C058900C112A is?  I want to buy one but 
Streakwave does not stock that number and I am getting confused by some of the 
other vendors.

Re: [AFMUG] Spam:*******, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

900 MHz FSK is 5 ms.

All other FSKs are 2.5 ms.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum

From: Af > on behalf of Bill 
Prince >
Reply-To: AFMUG >
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 10:32 AM
To: AFMUG >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Spam:***, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question

Pretty sure 900 FSK is 2.5 ms as well.

Only the 3650 stuff was 5 ms. The PMP450 made it optional.


bp




On 4/7/2016 7:33 AM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I think 900mhz FSK might be 5ms... and the 320's are 5ms.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc 
<t...@franklinisp.net>
 wrote:
Oh.  I think that is a fantastic idea!


Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131

317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online:  www.surfici.net

[ICI]
What can ICI do for you?

Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP 
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the
addressee shown. It contains information that is
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly
prohibited.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 9:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Cc: memb...@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Spam:***, Re: 2.5 or 5 Frame Question


Did you start along with Jamie already this morning?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Apr 7, 2016 9:31 AM, "Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc" 
> wrote:
WTF.  Good grief.  Don’t know why I am thinking its 5ms.
Maybe it’s the 430’s that are 5ms.


Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131

317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online:  www.surfici.net

[ICI]
What can ICI do for you?

Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP 
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the
addressee shown. It contains information that is
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly
prohibited.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2016 9:23 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Cc: memb...@wispa.org
Subject: Spam:***, Re: [AFMUG] 2.5 or 5 Frame Question


FSK is 2.5 ms.  That's why ePMP got that frame size, to sync with FSK.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Apr 7, 2016 9:21 AM, "Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc" 
<t...@franklinisp.net>
 wrote:
Ok Geeks,

I have a simple question that we cannot get a straight answer on.  (different 
answers)

Scenario:

ePMP BH – running 2.5ms 1gb
5Ghz 450 AP – running 2.5 ms 1gb
3.65Ghz 450 AP – running 2.5 ms 1gb
2.4 FSK AP – running 5ms 100Mb
1GB Sync
MT 450 1GB acting as switch

WILL the FSK customers see issues or not on that 5ms or does it matter once it 
hits the switch?


Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131

317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online:  www.surfici.net

[ICI]
What can ICI do for you?

Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP 
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the
addressee shown. It contains information that is
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly
prohibited.

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG -  www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7497 / Virus Database: 4545/11979 - Release Date: 04/07/16
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7497 / Virus Database: 4545/11979 - Release Date: 04/07/16

Re: [AFMUG] The new 450 beta and TDWR

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Eric,

It is currently supported on the 450i (AP/SM/BH) and 450 SM. We are planning to 
have it available on the 450 AP not in 14.1.2, but perhaps the next release.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum




On Mar 17, 2016, at 8:46 AM, Eric Muehleisen 
> wrote:

Any idea if the TDWR band will be available on the 450 as well as 450i?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Vlad Sedov 
> wrote:
We have it on a 450/450i cluster. No problems so far, though too early to tell. 
No bricks, thank Dog.

This build enables the TDWR band (5600-5650) on the 450i, which is why I was 
asking about the rules.. Extra bandwidth is good :D


Vlad


On 3/16/2016 2:02 PM, Sam Lambie wrote:
Has anyone deployed and tested 14.1.2  Build 8 yet? Thoughts?

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:56 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
http://www.wispa.org/Resources/Industry-Resources/TDWR-Resources/TDWR-Locations-and-Frequencies

:-)

Also, some radios are certified in that band and others aren't.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]
Midwest Internet Exchange
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]
The Brothers WISP
[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/youtubeicon.png]




From: "Jeremy" >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 1:06:14 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] The new 450 beta and TDWR


https://community.ubnt.com/t5/Business-Talk/WHT-s-TDWR-Location-and-Frequency-chart/m-p/644009#M34369

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Jeremy 
<jeremysmi...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
When within 35 km distance of a TDWR, the center frequency of the WLAN must be 
separated from the TDWR center frequency by 30 MHz.

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Vlad Sedov 
<v...@atlasok.com> wrote:
Hey folks.

I noticed that the TDWR band (5600-5650) is now available.. Are there special 
rules/regulations for using it?

Thanks,

Vlad







--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com

Re: [AFMUG] Baseball bat vs PTP 650

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

We would have but it would’ve turned into a 5 day test (match). Who has time 
for that. :)


On Mar 14, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Eric Kuhnke 
> wrote:

Now do this with a Cricket bat for your overseas market in ZA, IN, PK, BD, NZ, 
AU, UK...  :-)



On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:12 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:

Give me a couple 650 and a bat.  I'll show you.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mar 14, 2016 4:25 PM, "Alex Marcham" 
> 
wrote:
Hi All,

We just did some unorthodox reliability testing with the PTP 650:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZJcoNHmgE0

The radio works fine but my bat has seen better days. Anyone given a radio a 
worse beating?

Thanks,

Alex Marcham
Engineering
alex.marc...@cambiumnetworks.com

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 450 SNMP Bug

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Matt,

Yes, the config import failure is due to the auth key. This bug has has been 
addressed in 14.1.2 which is currently available as a beta release.

Regarding the 3.65 frequency setting on the SM, add an extra 0 to the 
frequency. So instead of:
snmpset -v 2c -c Canopy 169.254.1.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.53.0 s
366000,369000

Use:
snmpset -v 2c -c Canopy 169.254.1.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.53.0 s
366,369

This is because the raster is now 1 kHz while it was previously 50 kHz.

We will update the OID description in 14.1.2 to reflect this change as the 
example in the description is incorrect.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum




On Feb 9, 2016, at 11:56 AM, Matt 
> wrote:

worked.  I configure one SM and it works.  Restore the exact same
config to another SM and it won't register too tower.  Restore factory
defaults on it and configure step through web interface and it works
fine again.

On this part I did figure out that the Canopy configuration backup
does not restore the pre-shared authentication key.  Have to enter it
manually each time after applying the configuration file.

Re: [AFMUG] F/B Video on Cambium forum

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yup. Something with 53 dB F/B ratio is some serious kick-ass antenna []


The F/B ratio required is a direct function of the C/I performance of the 
radio's receiver. If you need 30+ dB of C/I to be at a solid 256 QAM, then you 
don't need 53 dB of F/B ratio. 32 dB will do just fine. 36/37 or 53 dB does 
give you more margin to play around with the back-to-back AP's Tx power but 
generally it may be overkill.


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Faisal Imtiaz 
<fai...@snappytelecom.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 1:04 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] F/B Video on Cambium forum

Interesting info..

So if we can use sector antenna which have 36/37/or 53 db of Front to back 
ratio, then these would be some serious kick ass antennas ?

Regards.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net

____
From: "Sriram Chaturvedi" <sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 11:31:45 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] F/B Video on Cambium forum
Hi Ken,

You are correct about ATPC taking care of equalizing the UL RSSI at the AP.

For downlink, as long as the antenna has good F/B ratio (32 dB like you 
indicated) and the back-to-back APs are set to the same Tx power, it should 
help. But maintaining 32 dB F/B ratio throughout the beam-width of the antenna 
can be a challenge.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com>


On Dec 22, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Ken Hohhof 
<af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
It probably seems that F/B ratio doesn’t need explaining.  The biggest hurdle 
is probably when WISPs start looking at third party antennas and other shiny 
objects (like price and antenna gain) distract them from looking for a F/B spec 
around 32 dB if they ever want to do frequency reuse.  The main thing this 
video probably does is to focus on why F/B ratio is important, even with GPS 
sync.

I would add that uplink interference can be worse because of varying distance 
to SMs.  A near SM can blast through the backside of the sector and overwhelm 
the signal from a distant SM on the front side.  ATPC can help with uplink 
interference by at least equalizing the received levels from near and far SMs, 
but ATPC typically doesn’t help with downlink interference.


From: Sakid Ahmed<mailto:sakid.ah...@cambiumnetworks.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 9:51 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: [AFMUG] F/B Video on Cambium forum

Hello,
We just uploaded a video about F/B ratio on our community forum. Curious to get 
some feedback from all the experts here.

http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/What-is-front-to-back-ratio/m-p/47820


Thanks
Sakid


Sakid Ahmed
sakid.ah...@cambiumnetworks.com<mailto:akid.ah...@cambiumnetworks.com>
(M) 1-773-780-5226 Skype: Sakid.ahmed
Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Chuck 
McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>>
Reply-To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" 
<af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 8:57 AM
To: "af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>" <af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Headphone adapter

Silly, you could have made it up in volume...

From: Forrest Christian (List Account)<mailto:li...@packetflux.com>
Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 3:24 AM
To: af<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Headphone adapter

I really wish I could find a custom cable manufacturer who I could have make 
these for me again.
The company I was having make them kept raising the per piece prices and also  
the minimum order... then was shocked when I refused to order several years 
worth for twice what I was currently charging my customers.
On Dec 21, 2015 4:17 PM, "George Skorup" 
<geo...@cbcast.com<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
That would need to be a 6p6c/rj12. You could easily buy that or anything like 
it, clip the rj plug off and crimp a new properly wired rj12 on it.

The best kits were the ones Forrest had made that were molded and are no longer 
made. And of course every freakin tech lost them.

On 12/21/2015 3:44 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
Actually, this link may be better
http://m.aliexpress.com/item/32284032088.html?adminSeq=220301292=32284032088=32284032088=1019232=Free-Shipping-3-5MM-Phone-Headset-to-RJ9-RJ10-RJ22-Headset-Plug-Adapter-3-5MM-to=2=wwwdetail2mobilesitedetail
On Dec 21, 2015 3:36 PM, "Nate Burke" 
<n...@blastcomm.

Re: [AFMUG] 450 900Mhz AP Power supply

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yup.

The 5GHz and 900 MHz 450i AP, 450i BHM/BHS use:
N00L034A POWER SUPPLY, 30W, 56V - GigE

For the 900 SM, you can use the existing 450 power supply:
N000900L001A Gigabit ENET Capable Power Supply (Same as the one for ePMP Sync 
AP and PMP 450).

That said, the N00L034A is brand new and will be available starting January 
2016. In the meantime, you can use:
N65L001B - PTP 650 AC Power Injector, along with AC Line Cord N65L003A, 
US Version.

Matt talks about this here: 
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/Power-supplies/m-p/47637#U47637

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum




On Dec 21, 2015, at 10:04 AM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:

I thought it was the same as 450i hardware.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Justin Marshall 
> wrote:
Hi,

Does anyone happen to know offhand what power supply is needed for the 900Mhz 
450 AP?

Only thing google seems to have a definitive answer on (maybe I’m missing it) 
is the SM needing 30V, and the back of the AP itself says 55V / 1.1A

Thanks
Justin
just...@pdmnet.net

Re: [AFMUG] 450i and the 5.4 band NOT usable in the USA?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Sam,

This is not a bug. 450i is not FCC approved for DFS bands, yet. It has been 
submitted to the FCC with full test results. We expect approval in early Q1 at 
which point we will unlock 5.4 band in the software.

Thanks,
Sriram

On Dec 15, 2015, at 5:51 AM, Sam Lambie 
> wrote:

Every time I attempt to change over to the 5.4 band from 5.7, I get this error, 
"Region or frequency is not supported in this release - Transmit Disabled!"

This is a US radio running 14.1.1 and I just tried 14.1.2 as well. This is a 
deal breaker if we can't use the 5.4 band. I am hoping it's a bug.. And if 
it is, squash it quick Cambium.



--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.com

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Sorry, a couple of typos. I meant to say the look and feel won’t change much as 
all the work is being done on the underlying GUI engine to improve performance 
and stability.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com>




On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:35 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
<sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>>
 wrote:

Hi Steve,

We have been prioritizing radio performance over the GUI for a very long time. 
But, like Josh indicated, we made some incremental improvements in GUI 
performance in 2.4 and 2.5 releases but we are fully aware its not enough. The 
team has been working on a wholesale rework of the GUI engine (not as much as 
the look and feel) and we hope to have significant GUI performance gains in a 
Q1 release. We want to make sure it works on a PC, netbook, mobile etc. with 
all kinds of processor and memory configurations. We have been receiving 
tremendous feedback on use cases and performance pains seen my many folks on 
here and we’re taking all this input and working through them carefully. So 
keep the feedback (as negative as they can be) coming, on the GUI performance.

All I can ask at this time is your patience and support.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>




On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

It does seem slightly better in 2.5.1 than what it did in 2.3, but there is a 
good bit of room for speed improvements.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, George Skorup 
<geo...@cbcast.com<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
I can deal with the GUI being stupid and slow because the performance is better 
than UBNT

On 12/4/2015 12:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
the biggest complaint i have is that rather than just loading the components on 
the page you are on, it loads the entire webserver and only displays the 
components of that page, very inefficient

Im lazy too, I like a site survey option, it makes life easier for techs to not 
have to know every possible essid

fsk and 450 make me happy



On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Josh Baird 
<joshba...@gmail.com<mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What are your problems?

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Adam Moffett 
<<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>dmmoff...@gmail.com<mailto:dmmoff...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:
I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems.

On 12/4/2015 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i could 
punch it in the face

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, George Skorup 
<geo...@cbcast.com<mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
Yes. You cannot have single quotes in the device name. I tried that once and 
the radio acted really stupid. None of the config would display. For example, I 
changed it from "Bob's House" to "Bobs House" and it was sane again.

Almost the same thing on Canopy, just a little bit smarter about it. It won't 
even let you put a ' in the SNMP site name field. It just reverts back to the 
No Site Name default.

On 12/3/2015 7:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I think it was related to a single quote ' in some of the fields of the config. 
I dumped the config, edited them out and now it seems to be fine.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
<http://www.ics-il.com/>http://www.ics-il.com<http://www.ics-il.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

Midwest Internet Exchange
<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>http://www.midwest-ix.com<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>

From: "Josh Luthman" <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com><mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
To: <mailto:af@afmug.com> af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:44:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Never had a problem, but keep in mind I use one PC to update from shipped 
firmware to latest and then slap on a template.

Then I use the laptop in

Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Steve,

We have been prioritizing radio performance over the GUI for a very long time. 
But, like Josh indicated, we made some incremental improvements in GUI 
performance in 2.4 and 2.5 releases but we are fully aware its not enough. The 
team has been working on a wholesale rework of the GUI engine (not as much as 
the look and feel) and we hope to have significant GUI performance gains in a 
Q1 release. We want to make sure it works on a PC, netbook, mobile etc. with 
all kinds of processor and memory configurations. We have been receiving 
tremendous feedback on use cases and performance pains seen my many folks on 
here and we’re taking all this input and working through them carefully. So 
keep the feedback (as negative as they can be) coming, on the GUI performance.

All I can ask at this time is your patience and support.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum




On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:

It does seem slightly better in 2.5.1 than what it did in 2.3, but there is a 
good bit of room for speed improvements.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, George Skorup 
> wrote:
I can deal with the GUI being stupid and slow because the performance is better 
than UBNT

On 12/4/2015 12:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
the biggest complaint i have is that rather than just loading the components on 
the page you are on, it loads the entire webserver and only displays the 
components of that page, very inefficient

Im lazy too, I like a site survey option, it makes life easier for techs to not 
have to know every possible essid

fsk and 450 make me happy



On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Josh Baird 
> wrote:
What are your problems?

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Adam Moffett 
<dmmoff...@gmail.com> 
wrote:
I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems.

On 12/4/2015 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i could 
punch it in the face

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, George Skorup 
> wrote:
Yes. You cannot have single quotes in the device name. I tried that once and 
the radio acted really stupid. None of the config would display. For example, I 
changed it from "Bob's House" to "Bobs House" and it was sane again.

Almost the same thing on Canopy, just a little bit smarter about it. It won't 
even let you put a ' in the SNMP site name field. It just reverts back to the 
No Site Name default.

On 12/3/2015 7:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
I think it was related to a single quote ' in some of the fields of the config. 
I dumped the config, edited them out and now it seems to be fine.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]

From: "Josh Luthman"  

To:  af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:44:54 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Force 110

Never had a problem, but keep in mind I use one PC to update from shipped 
firmware to latest and then slap on a template.

Then I use the laptop in the truck to do everything else on site.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Mathew Howard 
<mhoward...@gmail.com>
 wrote:
I saw something like that happen, but it went back to normal after I reloaded 
the interface... or maybe I had to reboot it, I don't remember for sure.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Mike Hammett 
<af...@ics-il.net> wrote:
Have any of you seen where most of a Force 110's setting fields are blank when 
you login and when you 

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

It was a joke. :) As much as the model/part number doesn’t make sense, it has a 
very specific format and meaning behind it. We carried it over from the Moto 
days.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com>




On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

I can't tell if that's a joke.  I'm not sure I even want to know the truth... =P


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
<sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>>
 wrote:
Correct! We have a very old but reliable IBM mainframe in our lab that spits 
out these random numbers on a daily basis. These numbers then get sent to our 
labelling machine. We just need to reprogram it to keep it to 20 characters! :)

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>




On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

Oh please tell me they're pseudo-random letters and numbers still!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
<sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>>
 wrote:
Force 200 in 2.4 GHz is available today.

Force 200 in 5 GHz will be available with our distributors late January.

Josh - We’ll look into shortening the length of the model/part number to a nice 
round 20 digits :(

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>




On Dec 2, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

Force 200 comes in 2.4 and 5 GHz bands.

Yes, the model scheme from Cambium can become even more insane.  And you 
thought it would stop at C0498732975928402580SA9S


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mike Hammett 
<af...@ics-il.net<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Yes. I wasn't aware there was a 2.4 version until I heard it here, but maybe I 
just wasn't paying attention before. There is definitely a 5 GHz version.


Much nicer to assemble. Much.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com<http://www.ics-il.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>

From: "Josh Baird" <joshba...@gmail.com<mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>>
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 1:27:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180


So, there is a 5ghz Force 200 on it's way?  I thought it was only 2.4.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
There is a shortage/lack of Force 110.  My reps gave me a heads up a month ago 
and I ordered 3 month supply to be safe.

I've heard the first of the year is supposed to deliver Force 200 5 GHz.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Mathew Howard 
<mhoward...@gmail.com<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yeah, I think the integrated is discontinued... anyway, I certainly wouldn't 
wait for them, the Force 180 is the same price and much nicer.

Is that why there's been a shortage of Force 110s? I thought it was still going 
to be a few months until the 5ghz Force 200 was shipping...

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I've heard that the older lines have been halted with the expectation everyone 
is buying the new ones - force 180 and force 200.

I'd suggest using Force 180 and 200 for 5 GHz.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne S

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Force 200 in 2.4 GHz is available today.

Force 200 in 5 GHz will be available with our distributors late January.

Josh - We’ll look into shortening the length of the model/part number to a nice 
round 20 digits :(

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum




On Dec 2, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:

Force 200 comes in 2.4 and 5 GHz bands.

Yes, the model scheme from Cambium can become even more insane.  And you 
thought it would stop at C0498732975928402580SA9S


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mike Hammett 
> wrote:
Yes. I wasn't aware there was a 2.4 version until I heard it here, but maybe I 
just wasn't paying attention before. There is definitely a 5 GHz version.


Much nicer to assemble. Much.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png][http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]

From: "Josh Baird" >
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 1:27:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180


So, there is a 5ghz Force 200 on it's way?  I thought it was only 2.4.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
There is a shortage/lack of Force 110.  My reps gave me a heads up a month ago 
and I ordered 3 month supply to be safe.

I've heard the first of the year is supposed to deliver Force 200 5 GHz.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Mathew Howard 
> wrote:
Yeah, I think the integrated is discontinued... anyway, I certainly wouldn't 
wait for them, the Force 180 is the same price and much nicer.

Is that why there's been a shortage of Force 110s? I thought it was still going 
to be a few months until the 5ghz Force 200 was shipping...

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
I've heard that the older lines have been halted with the expectation everyone 
is buying the new ones - force 180 and force 200.

I'd suggest using Force 180 and 200 for 5 GHz.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Louis Arsenault 
> wrote:
What is the story with the ePMP line?

I have had ePMP integrated units on back order for several weeks now.
Has Cambium stopped production on them?
Since we are 5Ghz then we should move to the Force 180?

--
-Louis

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Correct! We have a very old but reliable IBM mainframe in our lab that spits 
out these random numbers on a daily basis. These numbers then get sent to our 
labelling machine. We just need to reprogram it to keep it to 20 characters! :)

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com>




On Dec 2, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

Oh please tell me they're pseudo-random letters and numbers still!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
<sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>>
 wrote:
Force 200 in 2.4 GHz is available today.

Force 200 in 5 GHz will be available with our distributors late January.

Josh - We’ll look into shortening the length of the model/part number to a nice 
round 20 digits :(

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum<http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/>




On Dec 2, 2015, at 1:41 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:

Force 200 comes in 2.4 and 5 GHz bands.

Yes, the model scheme from Cambium can become even more insane.  And you 
thought it would stop at C0498732975928402580SA9S


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Mike Hammett 
<af...@ics-il.net<mailto:af...@ics-il.net>> wrote:
Yes. I wasn't aware there was a 2.4 version until I heard it here, but maybe I 
just wasn't paying attention before. There is definitely a 5 GHz version.


Much nicer to assemble. Much.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com<http://www.ics-il.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]<https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/ICSIL>

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com<http://www.midwest-ix.com/>

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]<https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange>[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]<https://twitter.com/mdwestix>

From: "Josh Baird" <joshba...@gmail.com<mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>>
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 2, 2015 1:27:57 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP: Integrated Radio VS Force 180


So, there is a 5ghz Force 200 on it's way?  I thought it was only 2.4.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
There is a shortage/lack of Force 110.  My reps gave me a heads up a month ago 
and I ordered 3 month supply to be safe.

I've heard the first of the year is supposed to deliver Force 200 5 GHz.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Mathew Howard 
<mhoward...@gmail.com<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yeah, I think the integrated is discontinued... anyway, I certainly wouldn't 
wait for them, the Force 180 is the same price and much nicer.

Is that why there's been a shortage of Force 110s? I thought it was still going 
to be a few months until the 5ghz Force 200 was shipping...

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
I've heard that the older lines have been halted with the expectation everyone 
is buying the new ones - force 180 and force 200.

I'd suggest using Force 180 and 200 for 5 GHz.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Louis Arsenault 
<lo...@ntinet.com<mailto:lo...@ntinet.com>> wrote:
What is the story with the ePMP line?

I have had ePMP integrated units on back order for several weeks now.
Has Cambium stopped production on them?
Since we are 5Ghz then we should move to the Force 180?

--
-Louis

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right 
away.

Thanks,
Sriram


From: Af  on behalf of Mark Radabaugh 
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP

How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i instead 
of 450 for 430 upgrade projects.  Do I have to get all of the 430 SM’s swapped 
first?

Mark


> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider 
>  wrote:
>
> It should work, but at the moment I can’t recall if/when we tried this with 
> PTP mode.  I’ll let you know.
>
> 450i - 450 isn’t really an “interop” situation like 430 - 450 was.  430 - 450 
> was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the way we did 
> MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data).  450i - 450 is much more 
> similar, and we have been using that combination internally for a long time.  
> It wasn’t part of the initial release of 450i due to needing to focus on the 
> HW release itself.
>
> I’ll be in touch on the PTP question.  It is important to allow you to 
> upgrade a PTP link one end at a time.
>
> Regards,
> -Aaron
>
>
>
>
> On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup"  on behalf of geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>
>> I thought interop was only for PMP?
>>
>> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote:
>>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
>>
>

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark’s question on 430 “upgrade” project 
where I assumed he was eventually going to upgrade his 430 SMs to 450/450i. 
Perhaps it was an incorrect assumption. Believe it or not, my responses aren’t 
loaded when I post here. 


> On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
> 
> "right away" sounds ominous
> 
> 
> -Original Message- From: Sriram Chaturvedi
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
> 
> 450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right 
> away.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sriram
> 
> 
> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net>
> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM
> To: af@afmug.com
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
> 
> How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i instead 
> of 450 for 430 upgrade projects.  Do I have to get all of the 430 SM�s 
> swapped first?
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider 
>> <aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
>> 
>> It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried this 
>> with PTP mode.  I�ll let you know.
>> 
>> 450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 was.  
>> 430 - 450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the 
>> way we did MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data).  450i - 450 
>> is much more similar, and we have been using that combination internally for 
>> a long time.  It wasn�t part of the initial release of 450i due to needing 
>> to focus on the HW release itself.
>> 
>> I�ll be in touch on the PTP question.  It is important to allow you to 
>> upgrade a PTP link one end at a time.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> -Aaron
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" <af-boun...@afmug.com 
>> on behalf of geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I thought interop was only for PMP?
>>> 
>>> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote:
>>>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
>>> 
> 

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yes you can, Mark. 


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net>
Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 12:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP

We have a number of towers to convert from 4 450’s with 90 degree sectors to 6 
AP’s with 60 degree sectors.   Most of these are already at 80-90% 450 SM’s.   
I was asking if I can go directly to 450i AP’s without having to finish 
collecting the 430’s.

Mark

> On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
> <sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Chuck, I was directly responding to Mark’s question on 430 “upgrade” 
> project where I assumed he was eventually going to upgrade his 430 SMs to 
> 450/450i. Perhaps it was an incorrect assumption. Believe it or not, my 
> responses aren’t loaded when I post here.
>
>
>> On Nov 28, 2015, at 10:28 AM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:
>>
>> "right away" sounds ominous
>>
>>
>> -Original Message- From: Sriram Chaturvedi
>> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:00 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
>>
>> 450i AP will interop with 430 SMs. You don't need to swap the SMs out right 
>> away.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sriram
>>
>> 
>> From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Mark Radabaugh <m...@amplex.net>
>> Sent: Saturday, November 28, 2015 8:24 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy 14.1.1 Release and PTP
>>
>> How about 450i AP to 430 SM? I would like to start deploying 450i 
>> instead of 450 for 430 upgrade projects.  Do I have to get all of the 430 
>> SM�s swapped first?
>>
>> Mark
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 27, 2015, at 11:21 AM, Aaron Schneider 
>>> <aaron.schnei...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> It should work, but at the moment I can�t recall if/when we tried this 
>>> with PTP mode.  I�ll let you know.
>>>
>>> 450i - 450 isn�t really an �interop� situation like 430 - 450 was.  
>>> 430 - 450 was quite a bit different, needing SISO to talk to MIMO with the 
>>> way we did MIMO at first (MIMO-B using both channels for data).  450i - 450 
>>> is much more similar, and we have been using that combination internally 
>>> for a long time.  It wasn�t part of the initial release of 450i due to 
>>> needing to focus on the HW release itself.
>>>
>>> I�ll be in touch on the PTP question.  It is important to allow you to 
>>> upgrade a PTP link one end at a time.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Aaron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/27/15, 12:09 AM, "Af on behalf of George Skorup" 
>>> <af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of geo...@cbcast.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I thought interop was only for PMP?
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/2015 11:38 PM, Matt wrote:
>>>>> Is it possible for a PTP450i master to talk to a PTP450 slave now?
>>>>
>>
>
>

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

The "i" stands for "Industrial" due to the IP66/67 rating of the 450i product 
line. Here's something the development team did to showcase that: 
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/PMP-450i-SM-in-a-Fish-Tank/m-p/45964#U45964


The 900 MHz 450 SM is a plastic/metal combo case with SMA connectors. I 
remember someone posting a picture of it here a few weeks ago. The 900 MHz 450i 
AP is similar to the 5 GHz 450i AP. More details (with pictures and spec 
sheets) available here: http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/access/pmp-450/


Thanks,

Sriram


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Josh Luthman 
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 9:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

450i is next generation.  I don't think they thought about the integrated part. 
 It's the cool thing to do - BMW i8, iPhone, iQ, etc.

I would assume N connectors but I don't specifically remember.  I remember the 
450i 900 looking just like the 450i 5700


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Chuck McCown 
<ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
The “i” at the end would lead me to believe they are  integrated.  Cambium has 
a bunch of different cases now, hard to keep  up.  So they are in the old 
plastic FSK case with two coaxes coming out?  N connectors?

From: Josh Luthman<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

The same case they're always in, Pinky!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Chuck McCown 
<ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
What case are the SMs in?

From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists<mailto:jeffl...@att.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

The APs are $2316 and the SMs are around $240 each (street price).  Sector 
antennas are about the same price as the other Cambium sectors

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com<mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>

On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:45 PM, Jaime Solorza 
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:


How much are the radios?

On Nov 24, 2015 9:40 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> 
wrote:
MSRP is $89.
Not difficult to figure out street price.

I can get two TY-900s for $280.  But spatial diversity!  And gold!

Actually, I wish there was a 12 inch 10 dBi panel, like a dual pol version of 
this:
https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=474662


From: Chuck McCown<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:13 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

When someone discovers the street price of this thing, please let me know.

From: Sriram Chaturvedi<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz


Hi Eric,



Yes. We offer an official Cambium dual polarity yagi. More info here: 
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/

[http://s3.amazonaws.com/cambiumstatic/assets/556e46f33596e1dd1833c775/logo-footer.png]<http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/>

900 MHz Directional Antenna - cambiumnetworks.com<http://cambiumnetworks.com>
900 MHz Directional Antenna. Details on the PMP 450i 900 MHz directional 
antenna.
Read 
more...<http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/>


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Eric 
Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

Is there an 'official' Cambium antenna or recommended antenna for dual polarity 
900 MHz yagi?  Something like the ubnt dual polarity yagi?

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Mathew Howard 
<mhoward...@gmail.com<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Pricing has been available for awhile, APs are the same as the other 450, and 
SMs are a bit cheaper (considering no they're all uncapped). Last I heard they 
were saying it will ship late November... which should mean any day now.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Ryan Ray 
<ryan...@gmail.com<mailto:ryan...@gmail.com>>

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

No. The AP is the 450i just like the 5 GHz 450i. Have you had a chance to look 
at the spec sheet yet? I think it will answer most of your questions on the 
mechanics.


On Nov 25, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Chuck McCown 
<ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:

Is this the same case as the 450 AP?

From: Sriram Chaturvedi<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:48 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz


The "i" stands for "Industrial" due to the IP66/67 rating of the 450i product 
line. Here's something the development team did to showcase that: 
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/PMP-450/PMP-450i-SM-in-a-Fish-Tank/m-p/45964#U45964



The 900 MHz 450 SM is a plastic/metal combo case with SMA connectors. I 
remember someone posting a picture of it here a few weeks ago. The 900 MHz 450i 
AP is similar to the 5 GHz 450i AP. More details (with pictures and spec 
sheets) available here: http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/access/pmp-450/



Thanks,

Sriram


From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Josh 
Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 9:42 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

450i is next generation.  I don't think they thought about the integrated part. 
 It's the cool thing to do - BMW i8, iPhone, iQ, etc.

I would assume N connectors but I don't specifically remember.  I remember the 
450i 900 looking just like the 450i 5700


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Chuck McCown 
<ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
The “i” at the end would lead me to believe they are  integrated.  Cambium has 
a bunch of different cases now, hard to keep  up.  So they are in the old 
plastic FSK case with two coaxes coming out?  N connectors?

From: Josh Luthman<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 8:34 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

The same case they're always in, Pinky!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Chuck McCown 
<ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
What case are the SMs in?

From: Jeff Broadwick - Lists<mailto:jeffl...@att.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 6:28 AM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

The APs are $2316 and the SMs are around $240 each (street price).  Sector 
antennas are about the same price as the other Cambium sectors

Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.com<mailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com>

On Nov 24, 2015, at 11:45 PM, Jaime Solorza 
<losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote:


How much are the radios?

On Nov 24, 2015 9:40 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com<mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> 
wrote:
MSRP is $89.
Not difficult to figure out street price.

I can get two TY-900s for $280.  But spatial diversity!  And gold!

Actually, I wish there was a 12 inch 10 dBi panel, like a dual pol version of 
this:
https://www.tessco.com/products/displayProductInfo.do?sku=474662


From: Chuck McCown<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 10:13 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

When someone discovers the street price of this thing, please let me know.

From: Sriram Chaturvedi<mailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:44 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz


Hi Eric,



Yes. We offer an official Cambium dual polarity yagi. More info here: 
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/

[http://s3.amazonaws.com/cambiumstatic/assets/556e46f33596e1dd1833c775/logo-footer.png]<http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/>

900 MHz Directional Antenna - cambiumnetworks.com<http://cambiumnetworks.com>
900 MHz Directional Antenna. Details on the PMP 450i 900 MHz directional 
antenna.
Read 
more...<http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/>


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>> on behalf of Eric 
Kuhnke <eric.kuh...@gmail.com<mailto:eric.kuh...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: 

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yes they will. 900 MHz PMP 100 uses 5 ms frame so make sure the 900 MHz 450i 
also runs 5ms frame.



From: Af  on behalf of John Woodfield 

Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2015 1:45 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz


Will they sync with PMP100 900?







John Woodfield, President

Delmarva WiFi Inc.

410-870-WiFi


-Original Message-
From: "Ryan Ray" 
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 6:01pm
To: "af@afmug.com" 
Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz


"We've been testing PMP450i 900MHz for almost a month now and we're really 
impressed with it. I have a 1.5 mile shot through multiple evergreen and 
deciduous trees, along with heavy interference in an urban environment (pager 
/scada noise spikes at around -65dBm across every channel). I get about 25mbps 
down and 2mbps up on speed tests using a 10MHz channel width. Latency/jitter is 
good enough for VoIP and gaming. I believe distributors will be shipping radios 
just after thanksgiving."

I found this on DSL reports. Anyone else had any experience with this 
equipment? How's it looking? Is there any word on pricing or ship times yet?

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Eric,


Yes. We offer an official Cambium dual polarity yagi. More info here: 
http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/products/accessories/pmp450-900mhz-directional-antenna/

[http://s3.amazonaws.com/cambiumstatic/assets/556e46f33596e1dd1833c775/logo-footer.png]

900 MHz Directional Antenna - cambiumnetworks.com
900 MHz Directional Antenna. Details on the PMP 450i 900 MHz directional 
antenna.
Read 
more...


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af  on behalf of Eric Kuhnke 
Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2015 7:37 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450i 900MHz

Is there an 'official' Cambium antenna or recommended antenna for dual polarity 
900 MHz yagi?  Something like the ubnt dual polarity yagi?

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Mathew Howard 
> wrote:
Pricing has been available for awhile, APs are the same as the other 450, and 
SMs are a bit cheaper (considering no they're all uncapped). Last I heard they 
were saying it will ship late November... which should mean any day now.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 5:01 PM, Ryan Ray 
> wrote:
"We've been testing PMP450i 900MHz for almost a month now and we're really 
impressed with it. I have a 1.5 mile shot through multiple evergreen and 
deciduous trees, along with heavy interference in an urban environment (pager 
/scada noise spikes at around -65dBm across every channel). I get about 25mbps 
down and 2mbps up on speed tests using a 10MHz channel width. Latency/jitter is 
good enough for VoIP and gaming. I believe distributors will be shipping radios 
just after thanksgiving."

I found this on DSL reports. Anyone else had any experience with this 
equipment? How's it looking? Is there any word on pricing or ship times yet?

Re: [AFMUG] RF mapping planning

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi Craig,

There is an offline frame calculator available to configure ePMP and FSK for 
sync. It can be found here: https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp/ and 
is titled "ePMP-PMP 100(FSK) Co-location Calculator”.

With your FSK settings below you can sync with ePMP with the following settings 
according to the calculator:
Max Range: 16 (You can go lower or higher and still frame align but 16 works to 
match what you have now)
Downlink %: 75%
Ch BW: 20 MHz

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forum




On Oct 8, 2015, at 2:12 PM, Craig House 
> wrote:

I assumed that there was a way to make the EP MP stuff work with the FSK stuff 
but I wasn't sure how to choose the right settings so that sink would work what 
is the trick
We use 4 control slots 16 miles max distance and a 75% down link on our FSK

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 8, 2015, at 13:48, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:

Use ePMP and do what you were doing before.  You can also match settings so 
ePMP will sync with FSK.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Craig House 
> wrote:
What do you guys use for planning out tower sector RF ??   We have always been 
a Cambium FSK shop and never really had to worry much about self interference.  
Now with FSK end of life and we are installing a lot more UBNT M series, we 
need to think more about RF planning than we used to.  Suggestions?

Craig

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp traffic shaping?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi ,

You can apply MIR limits to each SM (CPE) using RADIUS VSAs on ePMP.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com




On Aug 25, 2015, at 6:49 AM, Mike Hammett 
af...@ics-il.netmailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote:

To me what would be ideal is rate limits pushed down by RADIUS to the PPPoE 
server on the tower and RADIUS to the CPE directly. Then your upstream and 
downstream rates would be in check before hitting the PtMP infrastructure.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.comhttp://www.ics-il.com/

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.comhttp://www.midwest-ix.com/

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/mdwestix

From: Stefan Englhardt s...@genias.netmailto:s...@genias.net
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 12:46:36 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp traffic shaping?

You configure rate limits at the AP and select it at the SM.

 Ursprüngliche Nachricht 
Von: TJ Trout t...@voltbb.commailto:t...@voltbb.com
Datum: 25.08.2015 07:29 (GMT+01:00)
An: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp traffic shaping?

U can only prioritize but not actually rate limit right ?
On Aug 24, 2015 9:18 PM, George Skorup 
geo...@cbcast.commailto:geo...@cbcast.com wrote:
I hate the MIR profiles thing, but that's just me. And yes, I am totally 
spoiled by Canopy.

On 8/24/2015 10:39 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Config  QoS
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 24, 2015 11:27 PM, TJ Trout 
mailto:t...@voltbb.comt...@voltbb.commailto:t...@voltbb.com wrote:
Can you tell me where? I can't find it

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Josh Luthman 
mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.comj...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
 wrote:
Yes.  There's a really good interface for it.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 24, 2015 11:20 PM, TJ Trout t...@voltbb.commailto:t...@voltbb.com 
wrote:
Is it possible to do basic traffic limiting on a epmp?

Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

FYI, A Beta release with 2.5ms frame support is available: 
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Beta/ePMP-Beta-Release-2-5-RC10-is-now-available/m-p/42702#U42702


It will be great to get some feedback on it.


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 3:50 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

+1 about.

So I assume we'll see about half the current latency with 2.5 msec? I can live 
with that for most links.

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation.  And on a Saturday!!!


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Dan Sullivan 
daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:
2.5 msec frame allows for sync and improves PTP latency as compared to 5 msec 
frame.

ePTP cannot be synced as communication is driven based on dynamic data from 
each link.

Dan Sullivan
ePMP Software Manager

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:11 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

Yep, I'm pretty sure it doesn't use fixed frames in ePTP mode... trying to sync 
that sounds like it'd end up like airmax sync.
2.5ms frames make sync a lot more useful for ptp though.

On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

But that depends on frame timing which would leave you at the current tdd ptp 
(5ms today, 2.5ms after 2.5).  I'd love to see the 2ms latency be synced but I 
don't see how that would be doable.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 8, 2015 7:54 AM, Mike Hammett 
af...@ics-il.netmailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote:
No, I mean exactly what I said ePTP sync.

There's no reason that I'm aware of that the ePTP up\down cycles couldn't be 
synced. The regular sync has to deal with potentially dozens of clients. The 
ePTP just has to deal with one.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:48:14 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

Eptp sync doesn't sound possible.  That's what the tdd ptp is for.  Do you mean 
the 2.5ms timing?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Aug 8, 2015 7:47 AM, Mike Hammett 
af...@ics-il.netmailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote:
Though*  Early in the morning...


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


From: Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.netmailto:af...@ics-il.net
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:45:55 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?
Is it, thought?  ;-)


FWIW, I have some ePTP up (eagerly awaiting ePTP sync!) and no issues that I'm 
aware of.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 4:41:45 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?
How long has it been up?  According to Cambium I'm the only one that's been 
experiencing a bug and it's all over the place.  They've got a fix for it but 
it's just so weird that I'm the only one with the problem =/


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.commailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
Yep, I just replaced a pair of NanoBridges with Force 110's doing ePTP a couple 
days ago and we have at least one other.

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Anyone at all?

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] Dear Cambium: eAlign for Android

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Paul,

We just started working on it. I don’t have a date for you yet.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com



On Jul 17, 2015, at 8:10 AM, Paul McCall 
pa...@pdmnet.netmailto:pa...@pdmnet.net wrote:

Dear Cambium,

When will the Android app be available?  With 80% of us using Android, it would 
seem pretty important.

Thanks!

☺

Paul McCall, Pres.
PDMNet / Florida Broadband
658 Old Dixie Highway
Vero Beach, FL 32962
772-564-6800 office
772-473-0352 cell
www.pdmnet.comhttp://www.pdmnet.com/
pa...@pdmnet.netmailto:pa...@pdmnet.net

Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] ePMP Model Numbers

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Mike is correct.

They are both 5 GHz Connectorized Radio with Sync. But:
011A is ROW (Rest Of the World) for sale/use in countries that do not follow 
FCC or ETSI regulations
112A is FCC for sale/use in countries that follow FCC regulations

FYI, all the model numbers are listed in the ePMP Release Notes for quick 
reference.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com



On Jun 29, 2015, at 4:35 PM, Mike Hammett 
af...@ics-il.netmailto:af...@ics-il.net wrote:

The datasheet does list one as FCC and the other as International. C050900A011A 
is an FCC GPS sync. Not sure what the other one is other than International as 
I can't find it many places.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.comhttp://www.ics-il.com/

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.comhttp://www.midwest-ix.com/

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/mdwestix

From: Faisal Imtiaz 
fai...@snappytelecom.netmailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Cc: memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 8:28:59 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] ePMP Model Numbers

Oops sorry, my mistake, both are 5GHZ, containerized with GPS...

The best I can tell from the Data sheets, that one is FCC/US model and the 
other is International ?

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.netmailto:supp...@snappytelecom.net


From: Faisal Imtiaz 
fai...@snappytelecom.netmailto:fai...@snappytelecom.net
To: memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
Cc: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 9:18:42 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] [WISPA Members] ePMP Model Numbers


C050900A011A ... Connectorized 5ghz Radio
C058900P112A Connectorized 5ghz Radio w/GPS Sync.



aka, first one for CPE, the 2nd one for AP.

Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet  Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.netmailto:supp...@snappytelecom.net


From: Tyson Burris @ Internet Communications Inc 
t...@franklinisp.netmailto:t...@franklinisp.net
To: memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
Cc: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 9:13:40 AM
Subject: [WISPA Members] ePMP Model Numbers

Anyone know the differences between these two model numbers?

C050900A011A
C058900P112A

They seem identical but price isn’t.



Tyson Burris, President
Internet Communications Inc.
739 Commerce Dr.
Franklin, IN 46131

317-738-0320 Daytime #
317-412-1540 Cell/Direct #
Online: www.surfici.nethttp://www.surfici.net/

image001.png
What can ICI do for you?

Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh Wifi/Hotzones - IP 
Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the
addressee shown. It contains information that is
confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,
dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by
unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly
prohibited.


___
Members mailing list
memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yes, the dashboard graph has been temporarily removed for this release. We’re 
working on improving UI performance on netbooks and smart phones. The graph is 
something that will have to be reworked as well.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com



On Jun 30, 2015, at 3:58 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.netmailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:


in this version when you login to the subscriber unit, that graph is not even 
there anymore.  b.

- Original Message -
From: Mathew Howardmailto:mhoward...@gmail.com
To: afmailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

I think they fixed that a few releases ago... now it shows the actual 
throughput for the past few hours when you log in - I think.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
That's megabits per second not megabytes.

Those graphs are insanely big when I first log in.  I've seen it say 100s of 
mbps.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Nate Burke 
n...@blastcomm.commailto:n...@blastcomm.com wrote:
Ok, it might be more like 14mb.  According to the EPMP Traffic Graph, loading 
up the GUI Via RF, with no other traffic on the radio, 2mb/s for 7 seconds.


On 6/29/2015 4:11 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Is it really 30 megabytes?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Nate Burke 
n...@blastcomm.commailto:n...@blastcomm.com wrote:
This is known by all Cambium that every customer meets these following Criteria 
- There are NO exceptions to these rules:
1) Everyone has a 12core laptop for field use.
2) All Customers have Unlimited time to put together Force Dishes.
3) RF Signals will always be perfect to move that 30mb of webdata across the RF 
link for diagnostic.


On 6/29/2015 3:46 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
That might be true, but also there were some posts saying your browser has to 
download around a bazillion little files for each page, so it’s inefficient 
coding from the perspective of client side processing.  Which would mean fixing 
it would take a major revision to how the pages are designed, not just fixing 
one piece of code.

Also they probably aren’t following one of the principles of web design:  test 
it the way your customer will use it.  Gee, it comes up tolerably fast on my 8 
core 3 GHz workstation.  While customers are using an ATOM based netbook or a 
smartphone or the laptop they bought 5 years ago at Costco, because they don’t 
want to take their good PC up on a ladder in the rain.


From: Chuck McCownmailto:ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:31 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

I am guessing they farmed it out to elbonia and don’t have the source code.

From: Tushar Patelmailto:tpa...@ecpi.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 2:27 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

Do anybody know why they are not able to fix this problem?

Tushar


On Jun 29, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

Before anyone asks, no, the interface is still the speed of molasses in January.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Ray Savich 
ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.com wrote:
Get the details at http://bit.ly/1NqxnDw
Ray

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yes, agreed. We’ll update the Release Notes.

Thanks for your support.


On Jun 30, 2015, at 4:39 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.netmailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:


Good news!  We'll take it!
(but that should have been in the release notes ) : )

- Original Message -
From: Sriram Chaturvedimailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
To: AFMUGmailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

Yes, the dashboard graph has been temporarily removed for this release. We’re 
working on improving UI performance on netbooks and smart phones. The graph is 
something that will have to be reworked as well.

Thanks,
Sriram

Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/



On Jun 30, 2015, at 3:58 AM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.netmailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net wrote:


in this version when you login to the subscriber unit, that graph is not even 
there anymore.  b.

- Original Message -
From: Mathew Howardmailto:mhoward...@gmail.com
To: afmailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

I think they fixed that a few releases ago... now it shows the actual 
throughput for the past few hours when you log in - I think.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
That's megabits per second not megabytes.

Those graphs are insanely big when I first log in.  I've seen it say 100s of 
mbps.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Nate Burke 
n...@blastcomm.commailto:n...@blastcomm.com wrote:
Ok, it might be more like 14mb.  According to the EPMP Traffic Graph, loading 
up the GUI Via RF, with no other traffic on the radio, 2mb/s for 7 seconds.


On 6/29/2015 4:11 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Is it really 30 megabytes?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Nate Burke 
n...@blastcomm.commailto:n...@blastcomm.com wrote:
This is known by all Cambium that every customer meets these following Criteria 
- There are NO exceptions to these rules:
1) Everyone has a 12core laptop for field use.
2) All Customers have Unlimited time to put together Force Dishes.
3) RF Signals will always be perfect to move that 30mb of webdata across the RF 
link for diagnostic.


On 6/29/2015 3:46 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
That might be true, but also there were some posts saying your browser has to 
download around a bazillion little files for each page, so it’s inefficient 
coding from the perspective of client side processing.  Which would mean fixing 
it would take a major revision to how the pages are designed, not just fixing 
one piece of code.

Also they probably aren’t following one of the principles of web design:  test 
it the way your customer will use it.  Gee, it comes up tolerably fast on my 8 
core 3 GHz workstation.  While customers are using an ATOM based netbook or a 
smartphone or the laptop they bought 5 years ago at Costco, because they don’t 
want to take their good PC up on a ladder in the rain.


From: Chuck McCownmailto:ch...@wbmfg.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 3:31 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

I am guessing they farmed it out to elbonia and don’t have the source code.

From: Tushar Patelmailto:tpa...@ecpi.com
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 2:27 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Release 2.4.3 is now available

Do anybody know why they are not able to fix this problem?

Tushar


On Jun 29, 2015, at 2:56 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

Before anyone asks, no, the interface is still the speed of molasses in January.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Ray Savich 
ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:ray.sav...@cambiumnetworks.com wrote:
Get the details at http://bit.ly/1NqxnDw
Ray


Join the Conversation
Cambium Networks Community Forumhttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium System Release 13.4 Beta - Now Available!

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Sam – Alignment tone will work in 13.4. Ignore the phase 1/phase 2 note. Those 
are Engineering notes that came out inadvertently  :) It makes no difference to 
the user.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Sam Lambie
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Friday, April 17, 2015 at 10:40 AM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium System Release 13.4 Beta - Now Available!

What exactly is Phase 1 for Alignment tone? Alignment Tone, Phase 1 (Phase 2 
will require a new FPGA)

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Sam Lambie 
samtaos...@gmail.commailto:samtaos...@gmail.com wrote:
What about Audio alignment tone? Is that back yet? My installers will hate me 
if I implement a new firmware that breaks that feature.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jonathan Mandziara 
jonathan.mandzi...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:jonathan.mandzi...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:
Bill,

That fix was pulled into the PMP100 load line for 13.4.

Can you try it on your PMP100s and let us know if it is working satisfactory?

Best,

Cambium Jonathan

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Bill Prince
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 9:03 AM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium System Release 13.4 Beta - Now Available!

What I'm talking about is the thing that breaks femtocells when the SM is in 
NAT mode.



bp

part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


On 4/17/2015 6:44 AM, Bill Prince wrote:
Not seeing anything about the packet fragmentation that breaks most femtocells. 
I know this was in the 13.2 release for PMP4x0, but did it ever make it into 
the PMP100?



bp

part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com


On 4/17/2015 6:32 AM, Matt Mangriotis wrote:
This software also adds a LOT of new features to the PMP 100 platform, so try 
it out.






--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598tel:575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.comhttp://www.newmex.com



--
--
Sam Lambie
Taosnet Wireless Tech.
575-758-7598 Office
www.Taosnet.comhttp://www.newmex.com

Re: [AFMUG] EPMP updates

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Craig, 

ePMP does not have an auto update feature so it cannot pull updates on its 
own. A real person is doing this. Are you sure no one else has access to 
your radios? Do you have CNUT connected to these radios?

Sriram




On 4/8/15, 6:07 PM, Craig House cr...@totalhighspeed.net wrote:

Does the Epmp radios do an automatic update from Cambium as updates are 
released?  I have 4 of them on a tower with one customer connected that 
we just put up.  All of the radios updated and rebooted at around 1:30 
today   If they do update on their own can they be set to do it at a 
later time of night?  I cant find any way to disable the automatic update 
feature on them.

Craig

Re: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 stats.....not so good (was alignment help)

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

This is fixed in 2.4.1 which is now in Open Beta: 
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Beta/ePMP-Beta-Release-2-4-1-RC2-now-available/m-p/39608#U39608


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of CBB - Jay Fuller 
par...@cyberbroadband.net
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:37 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org
Cc: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] epmp 2.4 stats.not so good (was alignment help)


I could swear last night I was looking at an EPMP 2.4 unit running 2.4 and i 
saw it say scanningright there while i was looking at it.  yup.  just did 
it again.  and you KNOW it's registeredor you wouldn't be looking at it.

when is the ETA for this to be fixed? :)
- Original Message -
From: Josh Luthmanmailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] Cambium Newbie Alignment Help

True.  Hard to use it with all that stuff broken, though.  I certainly wouldn't 
deploy 2.4 yet.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Mathew Howard 
mat...@litewire.netmailto:mat...@litewire.net wrote:
2.4 also gets you ePTP mode though... which gets you much better latency.


From: members-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:members-boun...@wispa.org 
[members-boun...@wispa.orgmailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] on behalf of Josh 
Luthman [j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com]
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 2:57 PM
To: memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA Members] Cambium Newbie Alignment Help

Monitor - Wireless is your only real option.

If you upgrade to 2.4 you can use eAlign which is *AWESOME*.  However, you 
lose all kinds of other stats.  If it were me, I'd suggest you get them 
associated, upgrade to 2.4 on each side, use the eAlign tool and then 
downgrade to 2.3.4 to keep stats functioning.


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Scott Reed 
sr...@nwwnet.netmailto:sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
ePMP1000 Force


On 3/27/2015 3:42 PM, Caleb Knauer wrote:
 Model?

 On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Scott Reed 
 sr...@nwwnet.netmailto:sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
 We just put up our first Cambium PTP link.  Need to get it aligned next
 week.  Where in the GUI is the best place to watch to do the alignment?

 --
 Scott Reed
 Owner
 NewWays Networking, LLC
 Wireless Networking
 Network Design, Installation and Administration
 Mikrotik Advanced Certified
 www.nwwnet.nethttp://www.nwwnet.net
 (765) 855-1060tel:%28765%29%20855-1060  (765) 
 439-4253tel:%28765%29%20439-4253  Toll-free (855) 
 231-6239tel:%28855%29%20231-6239


 ___
 Members mailing list
 memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members
 ___
 Members mailing list
 memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members


 -
 No virus found in this message.
 Checked by AVG - www.avg.comhttp://www.avg.com
 Version: 2015.0.5856 / Virus Database: 4315/9393 - Release Date: 03/27/15



--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified
www.nwwnet.nethttp://www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060tel:%28765%29%20855-1060  (765) 
439-4253tel:%28765%29%20439-4253  Toll-free (855) 
231-6239tel:%28855%29%20231-6239


___
Members mailing list
memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members


___
Members mailing list
memb...@wispa.orgmailto:memb...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members





___
Members mailing list
memb...@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/members

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Josh - Thanks for the constructive feedback.


This is a bug on the backend statistics engine that broke a couple of things. 
AP list and SM bridge table (the one that George highlighted yesterday). It 
also causes the statistics page (Monitor-Performance) itself to have 
intermittent issues. We have a fix and will have a 2.4.1 beta out in a matter 
of days. Lemme know if you need the fix earlier.


I apologize for the trouble caused.


Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 6:19 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Epmp 2.4 bug - no ap list


Are you f$%king serious?

Do you guys even make sure the thing compiled before you release it???  What a 
dumbass bug!!!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110 PTP

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Correct. The video shows the Force 110 which uses the Unsync’d radio 
(identified by the two Ethernet ports). The Force 110 PTP comes with the 
Connectorized radio with Sync (single GigE port and GPS chip/connectors/antenna 
all included) but with a software tick (Thanks Josh. I’m using this going 
forward ☺) to disable sync functionality. The radio will still track satellites 
and provide coordinates but will not allow sync.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:42 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force 110 PTP

That's just a standard Force 110 in that video - not a PTP, the PTP is the 
exact same hardware as the synced AP and does have a GPS port (it even comes 
with the GPS antenna), but has it currently has sync disabled in software, but 
Cambium has stated that they are planning to enable sync for point-to-point.

On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Matt 
matt.mailingli...@gmail.commailto:matt.mailingli...@gmail.com wrote:
 It's expected, yes.

Do they have a GPS antenna port?  Not seeing one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFyNKpoIHO4


 Will these eventually have GPS sync with a firmware update for frequency
 reuse?

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Hi,

In Release 2.4 currently in Open 
Betahttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Beta/New-ePMP-Beta-Release-2-4-now-available/m-p/38345#U38345),
 the LEDs on the AP will indicate RSSI strength. There is also a new tool 
called eAlign (under Tools-eAlign) that provides a graphical representation of 
RSSI helping with alignment.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of TJ Trout
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:23 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?


Possible to make the ap show rssi on signal leds when in a p2p configuration?

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Great. Sorry, I should’ve posted about the Open beta on here, earlier. My 
mistake.

A few things about eAlign:

1.   Its available on the Master and Slave when the radios are in PTP mode

2.   Its available on the SM in PMP mode, not on the AP

3.   It will work when there is link. In other words, the alignment tool 
will not be useful when the SM is simply scanning for APs.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:45 AM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?

Excellent! I need to see this... downloading the beta now.

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:

Long as it's done before a full release all is well :)

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 13, 2015 9:20 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:
Yes. And I will warn you right now that it acts a little quirky (the format) on 
mobile devices. It will work just fine on a regular PC/Netbook. We’ll fix that 
so I ask for your patience. ☺

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:15 AM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?


Oh my god.  That's amazing.  An alignment page?!?!?!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 13, 2015 9:09 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:
Hi,

In Release 2.4 currently in Open 
Betahttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Beta/New-ePMP-Beta-Release-2-4-now-available/m-p/38345#U38345),
 the LEDs on the AP will indicate RSSI strength. There is also a new tool 
called eAlign (under Tools-eAlign) that provides a graphical representation of 
RSSI helping with alignment.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of TJ Trout
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:23 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?


Possible to make the ap show rssi on signal leds when in a p2p configuration?

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Yes. And I will warn you right now that it acts a little quirky (the format) on 
mobile devices. It will work just fine on a regular PC/Netbook. We’ll fix that 
so I ask for your patience. ☺

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?


Oh my god.  That's amazing.  An alignment page?!?!?!

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Feb 13, 2015 9:09 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:
Hi,

In Release 2.4 currently in Open 
Betahttp://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-Beta/New-ePMP-Beta-Release-2-4-now-available/m-p/38345#U38345),
 the LEDs on the AP will indicate RSSI strength. There is also a new tool 
called eAlign (under Tools-eAlign) that provides a graphical representation of 
RSSI helping with alignment.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of TJ Trout
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 7:23 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] Epmp leds for alignment in ptp config?


Possible to make the ap show rssi on signal leds when in a p2p configuration?

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

No problem. Motorola's WiMAX business was sold to NewNet a few years ago. So if 
the guy says NewNet, he would be correct.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dan Petermann
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 5:12 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

Awesome, thank you.

We are going to be interviewing a guy who used to work for Clearwire and I need 
to brush up.

On Jan 22, 2015, at 3:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:


Motorola for both Access Network (AP/BS) and ASN-Gateway. And a mix of Redback 
(now Ericsson) and Starent (now Cisco) for the Home Agent, AAA etc.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:47 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

Huawei was some of it. I'm not sure what else was used.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.comhttp://www.ics-il.com/

~WRD058.jpghttps://www.facebook.com/ICSIL~WRD058.jpghttps://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb~WRD058.jpghttps://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions~WRD058.jpghttps://twitter.com/ICSIL



From: Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.commailto:d...@wyoming.com
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:27:47 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

Does anyone know what radios clearwire uses(d)?

Re: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Motorola for both Access Network (AP/BS) and ASN-Gateway. And a mix of Redback 
(now Ericsson) and Starent (now Cisco) for the Home Agent, AAA etc.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 4:47 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

Huawei was some of it. I'm not sure what else was used.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[Image removed by sender.]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[Image removed by 
sender.]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[Image 
removed by 
sender.]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[Image
 removed by sender.]https://twitter.com/ICSIL


From: Dan Petermann d...@wyoming.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2015 3:27:47 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] OT: Clearwire

Does anyone know what radios clearwire uses(d)?

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM
To: af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

That's a rumor I have heard as well.
On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie 
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.commailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
wrote:
It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased it off 
of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.commailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either it's 
significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or they 
purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... 
presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and 450?  That 
would make way too much sense, though...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch)



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

What do you mean put in epmp like unit?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo dosnt yield 
good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need special adapters for 
it to work.

We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP.  I believe the force 110 
is better gain though.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
no



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr






On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, John Woodfield 
john.woodfi...@jwcn.bizmailto:john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz wrote:

Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish???

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini 
 g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:

 So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the
Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ

 Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual
pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM
with this contraption

 My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min



 Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr







--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Really? First time I'm hearing this and I've been on this list for a while. I 
must've missed it.


I will tell you now that ePMP was designed and built in Cambium. Hope that 
clears up any confusion.



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Tyler Treat 
tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I think everyone assumed epmp = further refined MemoryLink...  At least 
initially.

___
Mangled by my iPhone.
___

Tyler Treat
Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.

tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.commailto:tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
___


On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:

You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

That's a rumor I have heard as well.
On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie 
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.commailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
wrote:
It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased it off 
of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.commailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either it's 
significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or they 
purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... 
presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and 450?  That 
would make way too much sense, though...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch)



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

What do you mean put in epmp like unit?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo dosnt yield 
good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need special adapters for 
it to work.

We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP.  I believe the force 110 
is better gain though.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Jan 21, 2015 5:12 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
no



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr






On 1/21/15, 3:00 PM, John Woodfield 
john.woodfi...@jwcn.bizmailto:john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz wrote:

Can't you use an epmp integrates on the 100 dish???

Sent from my iPhone

 On Jan 21, 2015, at 1:51 PM, Gino Villarini 
 g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:

 So we are migrating some our Canopy 100 to epmpŠ primarily using the
Force110Š but I ponder, 99% of my PMP100 installs have dishesŠ

 Why cambium or anyone else has developed a simple bracket with a dual
pol patch so we can put a conn. Epmp there and just swap a Canopy SM
with this contraption

 My techs could do a swap in 5 minutes instead of 30-45 min



 Gino A. Villarini
 President
 Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
 www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
 @aeronetpr







--
Sent from

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

​Its great that you like the PMP100 platform.


If by bloated software, you mean Nate's GUI load time, we're actively 
investigating that with some information we got from Nate offline.


For PTP applications, you should be able to use max power. Please hit me up 
offline as well if you'd like to discuss specific scenarios.


Thanks,

Sriram


From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of John Woodfield 
john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:00 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


So how about fixing the bloated software? The old pmp100 software was great 
comparatively. Also, how about a EIRP fix so we can turn the power up in ptp 
applications or turn up if using a low gain antenna?







John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) 708-1937


-Original Message-
From: Sriram Chaturvedi sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:55pm
To: af@afmug.com af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?




Wow. I stepped away for a couple of hours and this escalated pretty quickly.



Mike - It certainly wasn't me that you talked to although it doesn't seem to 
matter what I say. Something about governments, companies and stuff and some 
folks wanting design documents. But you are right, ePMP is something where we 
see it as an opportunity to do things differently. We make mistakes no doubt 
but at least we know we tried and fix it as quickly as possible.




From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I specifically asked Cambium staff face to face on at least three occasions 
about it and it was avoided. It wasn't until I was at the office in September 
that they put it to rest.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


From: Sriram Chaturvedi sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:16:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Really? First time I'm hearing this and I've been on this list for a while. I 
must've missed it.



I will tell you now that ePMP was designed and built in Cambium. Hope that 
clears up any confusion.




From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Tyler Treat 
tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I think everyone assumed epmp = further refined MemoryLink...  At least 
initially.

___
Mangled by my iPhone.
___
Tyler Treat
Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.
tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.commailto:tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
___

On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:

You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

That's a rumor I have heard as well.
On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie 
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.commailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
wrote:
It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased it off 
of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.commailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either it's 
significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or they 
purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... 
presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and 450?  That 
would make way too much sense, though...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch)



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Thanks Josh. I'll send you a note offline to get a little bit more information 
so we can narrow down this issue.


Sriram



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Sri,

Slow on my tablet and phone as well.  I feel it should be faster on my PC and 
laptop.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Jan 21, 2015 10:07 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:

​Its great that you like the PMP100 platform.


If by bloated software, you mean Nate's GUI load time, we're actively 
investigating that with some information we got from Nate offline.


For PTP applications, you should be able to use max power. Please hit me up 
offline as well if you'd like to discuss specific scenarios.


Thanks,

Sriram


From: Af af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of John 
Woodfield john.woodfi...@jwcn.bizmailto:john.woodfi...@jwcn.biz
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:00 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


So how about fixing the bloated software? The old pmp100 software was great 
comparatively. Also, how about a EIRP fix so we can turn the power up in ptp 
applications or turn up if using a low gain antenna?







John Woodfield Delmarva WiFi http://www.delmarvawifi.com cell (410) 
708-1937tel:%28410%29%20708-1937


-Original Message-
From: Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:55pm
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?




Wow. I stepped away for a couple of hours and this escalated pretty quickly.



Mike - It certainly wasn't me that you talked to although it doesn't seem to 
matter what I say. Something about governments, companies and stuff and some 
folks wanting design documents. But you are right, ePMP is something where we 
see it as an opportunity to do things differently. We make mistakes no doubt 
but at least we know we tried and fix it as quickly as possible.




From: Af af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Mike 
Hammett af...@ics-il.netmailto:af...@ics-il.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:33 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I specifically asked Cambium staff face to face on at least three occasions 
about it and it was avoided. It wasn't until I was at the office in September 
that they put it to rest.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


From: Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:16:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Really? First time I'm hearing this and I've been on this list for a while. I 
must've missed it.



I will tell you now that ePMP was designed and built in Cambium. Hope that 
clears up any confusion.




From: Af af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Tyler 
Treat tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.commailto:tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:11 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I think everyone assumed epmp = further refined MemoryLink...  At least 
initially.

___
Mangled by my iPhone.
___
Tyler Treat
Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.
tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.commailto:tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
___

On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:

You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

That's a rumor I have heard as well.
On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie 
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.commailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
wrote:
It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased it off 
of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.commailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either it's 
significantly cheaper

Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

[Sriram Chaturvedi]

Wow. I stepped away for a couple of hours and this escalated pretty quickly.


Mike - It certainly wasn't me that you talked to although it doesn't seem to 
matter what I say. Something about governments, companies and stuff and some 
folks wanting design documents. But you are right, ePMP is something where we 
see it as an opportunity to do things differently. We make mistakes no doubt 
but at least we know we tried and fix it as quickly as possible.



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Mike Hammett af...@ics-il.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:33 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I specifically asked Cambium staff face to face on at least three occasions 
about it and it was avoided. It wasn't until I was at the office in September 
that they put it to rest.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


From: Sriram Chaturvedi sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
To: af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:16:27 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Really? First time I'm hearing this and I've been on this list for a while. I 
must've missed it.


I will tell you now that ePMP was designed and built in Cambium. Hope that 
clears up any confusion.



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Tyler Treat 
tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 6:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

I think everyone assumed epmp = further refined MemoryLink...  At least 
initially.

___
Mangled by my iPhone.
___

Tyler Treat
Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.

tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.commailto:tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
___


On Jan 21, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi 
sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.commailto:sriram.chaturv...@cambiumnetworks.com
 wrote:

You can put that rumor to rest because it’s not true.

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Reynolds
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 5:30 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com; Jason McKemie
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

That's a rumor I have heard as well.
On January 21, 2015 2:27:58 PM AKST, Jason McKemie 
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.commailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com 
wrote:
It's probably because they didn't originally design ePMP, just purchased it off 
of someone else (possibly Memorylink?)

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Mathew Howard 
mhoward...@gmail.commailto:mhoward...@gmail.com wrote:
I can only see two logical reasons that they didn't do that - either it's 
significantly cheaper to build an antenna in the ePMP form factor, or they 
purposely didn't want them to work too well with Canopy accessories... 
presumably to encourage people to upgrade FSK networks to 450 instead.

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
So you mean epmp guts put into the case they used for FSK, 430 and 450?  That 
would make way too much sense, though...


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:17 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Sorry, epmp unit with SM like features (bracket and patch)



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:13 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?

What do you mean put in epmp like unit?


Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Gino Villarini 
g...@aeronetpr.commailto:g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Josh, you are missing the whole point… I know this, but that combo dosnt yield 
good gain… maybe 15-16db total gain at best… also you need special adapters for 
it to work.

We need a direct replacement, remove SM, put Epmp like unit



Gino A. Villarini
President
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
www.aeronetpr.comhttp://www.aeronetpr.com
@aeronetpr



From: Josh Luthman 
j...@imaginenetworksllc.commailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
Reply-To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Canopy to Epmp migration path adapter?


Dude you can use the 27rd or KP reflectors with EPMP.  I

Re: [AFMUG] Epmp recovery?

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi TJ,

What state is the SM in right now? Does it boot up on the older load? Have you 
tried a factory reset yet? What was the upgrade failure? Was it the GUI 
indicating an upgrade failure during a normal upgrade or did you have some sort 
of a power failure during the upgrade? Are you able to access the radio via its 
default or fallback IP?

A lot questions before determining its not recoverable and going the RMA route 
:)

Alternately, you can contact our support engineers for this as you'll have to 
go through them to determine the RMA anyway.

Thanks,
Sriram



On Dec 8, 2014, at 11:50 AM, TJ Trout via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

Seriously? How can that be?

On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Josh Luthman via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:

Nope, RMA :(

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340tel:937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343tel:937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Dec 7, 2014 10:07 PM, TJ Trout via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
wrote:
I have a SM that failed upgrade, is it possible to recover?

TJ

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP SA

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

In the US, many are enjoying time with their family for Thanksgiving. However a 
number of engineers are putting in hours this weekend including today and 
tomorrow. In the non US locations, it's business as usual so work on the 
release continues. 

 On Nov 27, 2014, at 10:56 AM, Chuck McCown via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 
 So what are they doing today...  If mean, if you are really serious...
 
 -Original Message- From: Sriram Chaturvedi via Af
 Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2014 12:53 AM
 To: Ken Hohhof via Af
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP SA
 
 Congrats on your first ePMPs, George!
 
 SA in the GUI is in our plan but there's a lot going on already in terms of 
 adding functionality into the releases. So hopefully it will be soon. We've 
 already implemented ACS (under Tools-ACS) so the SA will simply be an 
 extension of it. Just need the software guys to free up to get it done, so 
 don't bother the Tonys just yet.
 
 Enjoy the ePMPs and Happy Thanksgiving!
 
 Sriram
 
 
 From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of George Skorup (Cyber 
 Broadcasting) via Af af@afmug.com
 Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:35 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP SA
 
 I just gots me my first ePiMPs in today and upgraded one to 2.3, so I
 must rant.
 
 Dear Cambium ePMP crew, this cannot be impossible, put the ePMP spectrum
 analyzer in the web GUI. I use my Android phone with the Canopy GUI,
 like a lot, and it has the SA in the GUI. I had no idea the ePMP SA ran
 in a Java window like UBNT. This is horrible. The new Canopy SA is
 great, so do that. If the Canopy guys won't give you the code for their
 SA, let me know and I'll bring a couple guys named Tony up to Rolling
 Meadows.
 
 Oh, and it must run at 5MHz channel bandwidth like 450, not sure if it
 does that now, just sayin. And while we're at it, putting it into
 spectrum analyzer device mode sucks. Maybe I'm just too used to Canopy
 and expecting too much, I don't know.
 
 BTW, the new ePMP GUI is excellent. And a dedicated multicast VLAN is
 pretty cool, I like that.
 
 I'm sure I'll have much more to complain about and probably just as much
 to compliment. 

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP SA

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Congrats on your first ePMPs, George! 

SA in the GUI is in our plan but there's a lot going on already in terms of 
adding functionality into the releases. So hopefully it will be soon. We've 
already implemented ACS (under Tools-ACS) so the SA will simply be an 
extension of it. Just need the software guys to free up to get it done, so 
don't bother the Tonys just yet. 

Enjoy the ePMPs and Happy Thanksgiving!

Sriram


From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) 
via Af af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:35 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP SA

I just gots me my first ePiMPs in today and upgraded one to 2.3, so I
must rant.

Dear Cambium ePMP crew, this cannot be impossible, put the ePMP spectrum
analyzer in the web GUI. I use my Android phone with the Canopy GUI,
like a lot, and it has the SA in the GUI. I had no idea the ePMP SA ran
in a Java window like UBNT. This is horrible. The new Canopy SA is
great, so do that. If the Canopy guys won't give you the code for their
SA, let me know and I'll bring a couple guys named Tony up to Rolling
Meadows.

Oh, and it must run at 5MHz channel bandwidth like 450, not sure if it
does that now, just sayin. And while we're at it, putting it into
spectrum analyzer device mode sucks. Maybe I'm just too used to Canopy
and expecting too much, I don't know.

BTW, the new ePMP GUI is excellent. And a dedicated multicast VLAN is
pretty cool, I like that.

I'm sure I'll have much more to complain about and probably just as much
to compliment.

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

No it cannot. It uses the CSM (Connectorized Module without sync). You will 
have to swap it out with the GPS module to do any kind of sync.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini via Af
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 7:37 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

Can the force 110 receive sync via the Ethernet port?

Gino A. Villarini
@gvillarini



On Nov 24, 2014, at 9:23 AM, Sakid Ahmed via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
Some clarification on this topic -

Only the GPS Sync Connectorized unit can do any type of Sync. Via onboard GPS 
and the external puck (for added gain) or via CMM on the Ethernet side.
The CSM (Connectorized Module without sync) CANNOT be used as a sync device 
whatsoever.

As for the Force PTP, yes, it does use the GPS unit but sync is disabled in the 
Force PTP configuration.

Hope this helps.

Sakid

p.s. There is a topic around mixing CMM3/CMM4s/onboard as a GPS source across a 
tower. This is covered in the document
ePMP Configuration in a Frequency Reuse Deployment

Found at
https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp/

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Burris @ Internet 
Comm. Inc via Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 5:44 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

Yes in training it was confirmed that the ePmP can get power and sync through 
CMM 34 but the 3 may be tricky to workaround.

Also you can gps time your PTP link but it wasn't recommend.  You should use 
the Mac level for your ptp

Sent from my iPhone

On Nov 22, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Paul McCall via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
Jeff,

It looks like you are saying that the connectorized radios withouth sync CAN 
indeed get sync from external source, CMM3, CMM4, sync injector.

I wasn't aware that was the case

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Broadwick - Lists via 
Af
Sent: Saturday, November 22, 2014 12:36 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

The 110 PTP unit has sync on board...disabled...expect that's to keep us from 
buying that unit and swapping the radios for a connectorized unit without sync. 
 :-)

I expect that, like the connectorized radio without sync, that you can take 
sync from a different source, like a CMM4.


Jeff Broadwick
ConVergence Technologies, Inc.
312-205-2519 Office
574-220-7826 Cell
jbroadw...@converge-tech.commailto:jbroadw...@converge-tech.com

On Nov 22, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Paul McCall via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
For Cambium we have a very remote tower that feeds several other towers.  
Everything is OSPF but logically...

Tower R (the main remote tower - a 190 ft. Rohn 25G with several anti-twist 
devices) is fed by...
   Tower A - 26 miles away - UBNT 3.65ghz Rocket M5 AND a Mikrotik RB912 5 Ghz
   This commercial tower (Tower A) has over 300Mbit of usable bandwidth and 
feeds about 75 to 85 Mbit to Tower A
   Tower B - 9 miles away - UBNT 5ghz Rocket M5
   This tower (Tower B) is a 90 ft. Rohn 25G

Tower R then feeds...
   Tower C - 12 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 50 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
   Tower D - 15 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
   Tower E - 17 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)
   Tower F - 14 miles away - Mikrotik RB912 - 5 GHz - 40 Mbit of usable 
bandwidth.  (Rohn 25G 120 ft.)

To get all this to work without Sync was quite a frequency juggling act.  There 
are other towers in the area and towers C, D, E, F connect (chain) to each 
other on the back side and we use a couple 3.65Ghz UBNT radios on the 
backside links.

The challenge...

First of all, I need more BW to each tower, but mostly Tower C.  And, I need 
better consistency... at times the links do not perform as I expect and then I 
get customer complaints etc. I hate that.

So, what would be the best solution that Cambium can recommend other than a ton 
of licensed links?  Obviously, the gear I am using now is inexpensive.

The PTP110 solution ... 2ms unsyncedcan it sync, now or tomorrow?   
Latency with sync?

Paul


-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2014 11:47 AM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force




Hi,

Please allow me to clarify.

The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE ports.

The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the
single GigE port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary PoE. GPS 
capabilities will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on board GPS 
chip to track satellites and provide coordinates).

The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release 2.4 and 
will apply to both products.

Reading this spec sheet.

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi,


Please allow me to clarify.


The Force 110 uses the Connectorized UnSync'd unit with the two 10/100 FE ports.


The Force 110 PTP uses the Connectorized GPS Sync'd unit with the single GigE 
port that supports 802.3af PoE in addition to proprietary PoE. GPS capabilities 
will be disabled (but the radio can still use the on board GPS chip to track 
satellites and provide coordinates).


The 2ms latency is achieved purely through software changes in Release 2.4 and 
will apply to both products.


There's more being discussed in this thread: 
http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/ePmP-Force-110/m-p/35810#U35810?

ePmP; Force 110 - Cambium Networks Community
I'm looking at the specs for the Force 110 and I see it says the radio can 
achieve 150 Mbs of real data throughput. Then I see the ethernet connect...
Read 
more...http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/ePmP-Force-110/m-p/35810#U35810



Thanks,

Sriram



From: Af af-boun...@afmug.com on behalf of Mathew Howard via Af af@afmug.com
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:29 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force

Isn't the 2ms without sync?


From: Af [af-boun...@afmug.com] on behalf of Josh Luthman via Af [af@afmug.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2014 7:04 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Force


2ms check again

http://www.cambiumnetworks.com/spec-sheets/epmp_force110_ptp_specs/epmp_force110_ptp_specs-2

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Nov 19, 2014 7:59 PM, Matt via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com 
wrote:
 The ptp, yes.

Oops, I forgot to include ePMP PTP Force 110 in my question.  Anyone
got there hands on them yet?  Spec sheet says 17ms latency with GPS
enabled in PTP.  Was really hoping for less then that.



  Exactly, the force110 based PTP does not include GPS sync
 

 The Force 110 PTP PDF spec sheet states GPS sync.

 
  The same as any another SM?  It's just a connectorized radio with 25db
  dish.
 

  Anyone got there hands on an ePMP Force yet?  Curious on actual
  latency and throughput with GPS enabled.

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Software 2.3

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Gilbert,

Do you have the support case number handy? I will follow up internally on this 
issue and get back to you.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. 
via Af
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2014 10:09 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] ePMP Software 2.3

I would suggest against 2.3 if you are utilizing VLANs. I discovered a bug and 
have a ticket with Cambium where I was able to reproduce the bug with them 
watching. I use VLANs. With a management VLAN and 2.3, I lost all web access to 
the AP radios. I had limited SSH access. Through SSH, I was able to disable the 
management VLAN and gain access through the web interface.

Gilbert


On 11/3/2014 5:43 AM, Mike Hammett via Af wrote:
Has anyone else tried 2.3 yet? Support is directing me to install it, but this 
is the only 2.3 report I've seen...  and not overly optimistic.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

[http://www.ics-il.com/images/fbicon.png]https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL[http://www.ics-il.com/images/googleicon.png]https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb[http://www.ics-il.com/images/linkedinicon.png]https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions[http://www.ics-il.com/images/twittericon.png]https://twitter.com/ICSIL


From: Gilbert T. Gutierrez, Jr. via Af af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 7:42:15 PM
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP Software 2.3

I was just deploying 2 sectors after successful tests and went ahead and
updated them with 2.3. Big mistake! I can no longer access them through
the web browser. I can SSH briefly to them before that session locks up.
I was wondering if anyone knows how to revert them to the previous
software via the command line (They have 2 software banks)? The only
thing I have figured out is how to reboot them because the session will
not stay up. CNUT will also not work to re-upload 2.2 (hung uploading
image).

Gilbert

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP feature

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Steve,

Yes, we are considering doing a point release to 2.3 to add this support.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Wireless Admin via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 4:12 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP feature

Anyone know when Cambium is going to add a management IP address for ePMP when 
configured to run NAT/PPPoE.  The lack of management IP is really getting to be 
a PIA.

Steve B.

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi Dan - Absolutely Yes.

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Dan Petermann via Af
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:56 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65

Can these be run in a 20MHz channel width, 4 APs to a tower, with frequency 
reuse of ABAB?

Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi Colin – I can’t comment on roadmap details but Release 13.2 has significant 
speed improvements over prior releases. Are you looking for something more than 
what 13.2 offers?

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Colin Stanners via Af
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 3:11 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65

Do you if there's plans for a 15mhz mode so 6APs per tower can be done with 
more speed than the 10mhz mode?

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
Hi Dan - Absolutely Yes.

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Dan Petermann via Af
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 2:56 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65

Can these be run in a 20MHz channel width, 4 APs to a tower, with frequency 
reuse of ABAB?

Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Shayne,

It doesn’t do that automatically. You have to explicitly configure the SM to 
operate in Standard WiFi mode (from the Quick Start or Configuration-Radio 
page) to connect to an AP operating standard 802.11.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Shayne Lebrun via Af
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 8:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

Is the basic idea that you’re using an SSID and wpa2 anyway, so when the ePMP 
tries to connect, it then identifies the AP as 802.11 or CanopyMagicSauce and 
connects accordingly?

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 11:25 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

Got it! Makes sense

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:48 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Cc: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

If you turn Airmax off on your UBNT AP's you can slowly swap all CPE's to Epmp 
then change AP to Epmp that is what wifi mode is for

—
Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox


On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Paul McCall via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
What is the perceived application for the SM operating in standard WiFi mode ?


From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 7:09 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!


Folks,

ePMP Beta software 2.3-RC10 is now available for download here: 
https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp

System Release 2.3 adds the following features:

• 5 MHz and 10 MHz channel bandwidth support

o   Max number of subscribers is limited to 30 for 5MHz and 60 for 10 MHz

• SM Wi-Fi mode support (Only 20 MHz and 40 MHz channel bandwidths)

o   SM can operate in standard Wi-Fi mode

• Broadcast Traffic Shaping (Limiting)

o   Ability to limit the number of broadcast packets per second

• Multicast VLAN and Prioritization

o   Multicast VLAN support with prioritization

o   Ability to leave/join multicast groups and limit number of multicast groups 
to up to 5 groups

o   Support for IGMPv3 snooping

• CLI access via ssh (default credentials: admin/admin)

• Option to set SM Max Tx power manually

Please post any feedback on the ePMP Beta Forum!
http://epmpbeta.community.cambiumnetworks.com/


Thanks,
Sriram

Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Paul is right. There’s quite a bit of variables to account for auto selection. 
No doubt, there are enhancements that can be done in this area. But for the 
sake of time, we wanted to get the functionality out first and then create 
automation around it later. Good feedback, Steve!

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 11:38 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

That might be a bit tricky to coordinate all the variables.  It’s quite easy to 
change all the SMs via SNMP , so I would imagine getting all the ePMP SMs 
online with WiFI, then issuing an SNMP command to them to change to normal mode 
and reboot, then change the APs then everything would come up.

That’s how we are going to do it to upgrade the few UBNT towers that we have

Paul

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Steve D via Af
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 12:34 PM
To: af
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

For these situations where someone might want two configurations, it would be 
nice to be able to pre-load configurations and if the sm can't connect to an AP 
for a set amount of time, it loads the other config and tries that, and goes 
back and forth until it locks on.

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Sriram Chaturvedi via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
Shayne,

It doesn’t do that automatically. You have to explicitly configure the SM to 
operate in Standard WiFi mode (from the Quick Start or Configuration-Radio 
page) to connect to an AP operating standard 802.11.

Thanks,
Sriram

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.commailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf 
Of Shayne Lebrun via Af
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 8:15 AM

To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

Is the basic idea that you’re using an SSID and wpa2 anyway, so when the ePMP 
tries to connect, it then identifies the AP as 802.11 or CanopyMagicSauce and 
connects accordingly?

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Paul McCall via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 11:25 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

Got it! Makes sense

From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of timothy steele via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 10:48 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Cc: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

If you turn Airmax off on your UBNT AP's you can slowly swap all CPE's to Epmp 
then change AP to Epmp that is what wifi mode is for

—
Sent from Mailboxhttps://www.dropbox.com/mailbox


On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:29 PM, Paul McCall via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
What is the perceived application for the SM operating in standard WiFi mode ?


From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Sriram Chaturvedi via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 7:09 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!


Folks,

ePMP Beta software 2.3-RC10 is now available for download here: 
https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp

System Release 2.3 adds the following features:

• 5 MHz and 10 MHz channel bandwidth support

o   Max number of subscribers is limited to 30 for 5MHz and 60 for 10 MHz

• SM Wi-Fi mode support (Only 20 MHz and 40 MHz channel bandwidths)

o   SM can operate in standard Wi-Fi mode

• Broadcast Traffic Shaping (Limiting)

o   Ability to limit the number of broadcast packets per second

• Multicast VLAN and Prioritization

o   Multicast VLAN support with prioritization

o   Ability to leave/join multicast groups and limit number of multicast groups 
to up to 5 groups

o   Support for IGMPv3 snooping

• CLI access via ssh (default credentials: admin/admin)

• Option to set SM Max Tx power manually

Please post any feedback on the ePMP Beta Forum!
http://epmpbeta.community.cambiumnetworks.com/


Thanks,
Sriram

Re: [AFMUG] ePMP on 2.2, run remote spectrum, can't get back in...

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi, 

I looked into this with Matt, so here's the update on the issue. 

Matt had previously configured this radio as an SM in NAT mode which configures 
the radio with separate WAN and LAN IP addresses.  When he switched it to an 
AP, there is only one IP address which is the bridge IP (WAN IP when in SM NAT 
mode). But when he switched the radio to Spectrum Analyzer mode from an AP, it 
used the SM's NAT configuration instead of remembering and using the APs bridge 
config. So from the LAN (Ethernet side), the radio was accessible through the 
LAN IP and local IP (169.254.1.1) but not the bridge (WAN) IP. 

Clearly we have to add some logic in there to remember what radio mode the 
device was previously in to prevent this from happening. One workaround for now 
is, before switching a radio to an AP from an SM, make sure the SM was 
configured for Bridge mode. This will avoid the situation until we provide a 
fix. 

Thank for exposing this bug, Matt!

Sriram


-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt Jenkins via Af
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 11:06 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: [AFMUG] ePMP on 2.2, run remote spectrum, can't get back in...


Cambium,

I am trying to run spectrum on an ePMP AP remotely. I changed the unit 
to Spectrum Analyzer and lost access. However I can ping the unit from 
the router on 169.254.1.1.

So I got out another radio and set it up in the office and the same 
thing happened. It is accessible on 169.254.1.1 and 192.168.0.3, but not 
that IP it originally was configured with.

The one on the tower is over an hour drive away. How do I get it back on 
it original IP so I can run spectrum remotely?

[AFMUG] New ePMP Beta Software 2.3-RC10 available!

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Folks,

ePMP Beta software 2.3-RC10 is now available for download here: 
https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp

System Release 2.3 adds the following features:

* 5 MHz and 10 MHz channel bandwidth support

o   Max number of subscribers is limited to 30 for 5MHz and 60 for 10 MHz

* SM Wi-Fi mode support (Only 20 MHz and 40 MHz channel bandwidths)

o   SM can operate in standard Wi-Fi mode

* Broadcast Traffic Shaping (Limiting)

o   Ability to limit the number of broadcast packets per second

* Multicast VLAN and Prioritization

o   Multicast VLAN support with prioritization

o   Ability to leave/join multicast groups and limit number of multicast groups 
to up to 5 groups

o   Support for IGMPv3 snooping

* CLI access via ssh (default credentials: admin/admin)

* Option to set SM Max Tx power manually

Please post any feedback on the ePMP Beta Forum!
http://epmpbeta.community.cambiumnetworks.com/

Thanks,
Sriram

Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SNMP Default Frequencies

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi, 

There is no SNMP support to push the Default Frequencies button, yet. Like 
Joe pointed out, the OIDs below will allow you to populate the list with a 
single set command. Also, all new radios out of the box will have the default 
list populated (or when you factory default them).  Please let us know if that 
is not the case.

Thanks,
Sriram

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joe Cracchiolo via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:20 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SNMP Default Frequencies

There is a pair of new MIB's for that, WHISP-BOX-MIBV2-MIB::addCustomFreqList.0 
and WHISP-BOX-MIBV2-MIB::removeCustomFreqList.0 in v13.2 b32.  I haven't tried 
that on MIB value yet to see how well it works.  You can also use a curl 
command to program frequencies in the older firmware.

Joe

On Oct 7, 2014, at 10:01, Matt via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Programming 450 3.65 SM's.  See a new button under 'Custom 
 Frequencies' called 'Default Frequencies'.  Anyway to push that button 
 with SNMP?

Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SNMP Default Frequencies

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Matt - Yes, this works for me as well.

Correction on the IPv6 filtering SNMP support! The OIDs made it into 13.2 
(Build 32), currently available as Open beta @ 
https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/pmp450

The All IPv6 filter SNMP OID is .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.160.0

OIDs for the other IPv6 filters are in there as well. 

Thanks,
Sriram


-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 2:56 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SNMP Default Frequencies

Does this work?

snmpset -v 2c -c Canopy 169.254.1.1 .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.53.0 s
365250,365500,365750,366000,366250,366500,366750,367000,367250,367500,367750,368000,368250,368500,368750,369000,369250,369500,369750

Started just breaking it in two to get it to work.  We program all sm settings 
through SNMP before they go out the door.  Much faster and less error prone 
then going through the web interface.


On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi via Af af@afmug.com wrote:
 Hi Matt,

 The length of the OID string is limited to 128 characters (commas included). 
 The string you have below is 118 characters, so it's odd that it doesn’t 
 work. Double check to make sure there are no leading or trailing spaces. I 
 tried the same string and it worked for me. Hit me up offline if you are 
 having trouble with this.

 IPv6 filter settings are not supported through SNMP in Release 13.2.

 Thanks,
 Sriram

 -Original Message-
 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt via Af
 Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 1:16 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SNMP Default Frequencies

 Sriram,

 I found this works.

 snmpset -v 2c -c $community $ip .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.53.0 s
 365500,365750,366000,366250,366500,366750,367000,367250,367500,367750,
 368000,368250,368500,368750,369000,369250,369500
 snmpset -v 2c -c $community $ip .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.53.0 s 
 365250,369750

 I still cannot do them all at once, it gives an error.

 On a related topic.  This sets the IPv4 all filter.

 snmpset -v 2c -c $community $ip .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.3.2.132.0 i 1

 What sets the IPv6 all filter?  Thanks.






 On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Sriram Chaturvedi via Af af@afmug.com 
 wrote:
 Hi,

 There is no SNMP support to push the Default Frequencies button, yet. Like 
 Joe pointed out, the OIDs below will allow you to populate the list with a 
 single set command. Also, all new radios out of the box will have the 
 default list populated (or when you factory default them).  Please let us 
 know if that is not the case.

 Thanks,
 Sriram

 -Original Message-
 From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Joe Cracchiolo 
 via Af
 Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 12:20 PM
 To: af@afmug.com
 Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 450 3.65 SNMP Default Frequencies

 There is a pair of new MIB's for that, 
 WHISP-BOX-MIBV2-MIB::addCustomFreqList.0 and 
 WHISP-BOX-MIBV2-MIB::removeCustomFreqList.0 in v13.2 b32.  I haven't tried 
 that on MIB value yet to see how well it works.  You can also use a curl 
 command to program frequencies in the older firmware.

 Joe

 On Oct 7, 2014, at 10:01, Matt via Af af@afmug.com wrote:

 Programming 450 3.65 SM's.  See a new button under 'Custom 
 Frequencies' called 'Default Frequencies'.  Anyway to push that 
 button with SNMP?

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi Adam, 

There may have been a miscommunication. Sorry for the confusion. 

Thanks,
Sriram

-Original Message-
From: Af [mailto:af-bounces+sriram.chaturvedi=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com] On 
Behalf Of Adam Moffett via Af
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 9:21 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question


That's different from what I was told in Albany.  The front/back setting does 
something?

 Regarding the “Front Sector” and “Back Sector” settings recommended in 
 the doc (and User Guide), you will have to follow that. That is part 
 of the magic sauce in ePMP that make GPS sync work on this platform.

Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question

[Sriram Chaturvedi via Af]

Hi,


Yes, the GPS chip comes with an internal patch antenna. The internal patch 
antenna is automatically disabled once you connect the external GPS antenna 
(and auto enables when you disconnect the external antenna). If you think the 
radio itself doesn't have clear LOS to the sky, then you can use the external 
antenna and place it elsewhere on the installation to get better LOS to the sky.


There are a couple of documents on our support site 
(https://support.cambiumnetworks.com/files/epmp?) you can read through that 
will help answer questions about ABAB deployment using ePMP.


Thanks,
Sriram



From: Af af-bounces+sriram.chaturvedi=cambiumnetworks@afmug.com on behalf 
of That One Guy via Af af@afmug.com
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 4:36 PM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question

the APs come with an antenna for GPS, but its never been clear to me whether 
there is also an internal patch

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Jeremy Grip via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
So would you be able to switch over to the onboard sync remotely? Do you need 
an antenna for each AP for using it? Do you think it's as precise as using an 
CMM4 (or SyncPipe Deluxe w/Gig Injector) if not as robust? If all POPs are 
sync'd with same Up/Dn ratio and max cell distance and they're talking to the 
same birds, is it pretty much the same?


From: Af 
[mailto:af-bounces+gripmailto:af-bounces%2Bgrip=nbnworks@afmug.commailto:nbnworks@afmug.com]
 On Behalf Of Adam Moffett via Af
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 2:55 PM
To: af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Cambium Newbie Question


.also the PMP100 SyncInjector from Packetflux ought to work with ePMP.  You 
might want the gigE version, but in the real world with a mix of subscribers at 
different MCS levels I'm not sure how likely you are to exceed 100x100.

The CMM4 is a much more rugged beast.  It is expensive, but you are not likely 
to go back and wish you'd bought the cheap one.

My plan is to hook up the internal GPS and have it available, but also to 
provide sync over power.  Once you are using GPS sync to re-use channels it 
becomes critical that it's always working, so better to have two timing sources 
available IMO.
They have built in GPS if youre on a budget, not sure why alot of people are so 
die hard against using it

On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Jeremy Grip via Af 
af@afmug.commailto:af@afmug.com wrote:
I'm looking at ePMP w/channel reuse from a cost-comparison standpoint. Trying 
to figure out how much I need to spend on GPS synch for a 4 AP/ 2 channel 
cluster. Does it need to be a CMM4? I will want to be synching multiple POPs...


Jeremy Grip
North Branch Networks,LLC




--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts 
you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them 
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- 
IBM maintenance manual, 1925




--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts 
you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them 
together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- 
IBM maintenance manual, 1925