[asterisk-users] Re: Do my messages come through?
On 2006-11-06 13:16:50 -0800, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi all, DO my messages come through to the list? I have had some problems wiht my email client here. Looks like your spell checker has issues also... ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Desired apps
Is there a list of apps or desired features for users? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk and FreeTDS 0.64 or 0.63
Hello all, just curious if anyone's successfully compiled (*) with the latest FreeTDS code/driver. The Makefile in (*) seems to only take care of 0.63 or older. I tried to muck around with it a bit into tricking to compile for not just 0.63 but anything later than 0.62 but it seems to crap out complaining about CDR modules, which I really don't need. It's been a while since I tried it but I seriously doubt there's any dev. done to focus on intergarting MSSQL or non-open-source DBs with (*). If someone's done it or knows how to do it or even can tell me if it's even worth it, then I'd really appreciate your comments. Best Regards, \R ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Fast detection of unreachable SIP clients?
On Monday 06 November 2006 16:41, Matt wrote: This should work.. please make sure you have qualify=yes on in your sip.conf file for each of your sip entries. Now it works. Thank you! On 11/6/06, Dmitry Ivanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello! I have this in my dialplan: Dial(SIP/${ext}, 300); switch(${DIALSTATUS}) { case BUSY: Busy(); break; default: Hangup(); }; This means that SIP phone will ring for max. five minutes if phone can be contacted. When SIP phone is turned off or there is no connectivity, calling party hears many many seconds of silence. I want Dial() to return CHANUNAVAIL if there was no SIP response from the phone within 1 or 2 seconds. In this case, calling party will hear out of range message similar to mobile networks. Is this possible? -- Dmitry Ivanov Network engineer Telecentrs Riga, Latvia [EMAIL PROTECTED] (+371) 7160235 Weather at Riga Intl (EVRA/RIX): Tuesday 07 November 2006 09:50,9 km/h S,2°C,1003 hPa,,, ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen
Hi guys. I just bought and configured a Snom 360 and have noticed that the LCD is constantly flickering at a rate of ~10-15Hz (that's a guess). Either way, it's very distracting. Has anyone else encountered this before? Any solutions? Cheers, -- Nick E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588 F: +61 7 5591 6588 If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make any use of the email. We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality or copyright associated with it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk Showing 404 not found when calling from third party SIP server (newbie question)
Hi All, I have installed Asterisk Successfully and configure a out bound trunk for another SIP server so that if Ill dial 777123 from an asterisk-registered-phone then it will dial to the phone extension(123)-registered in the third party server. But my problem is that the reverse is not happening, that is I am not able to call from Third party SIP server to Asterisk extensions. Actually the third party SIP Server is sending request to Asterisk for the extension registered but Asterisk sending the response 404 not found where as the actually the extension really exist. I have included the all extensions contexts with the incoming contexts. Is there anything to configure for incoming contexts. Is there any way to know which trunk is accepting the incoming calls Thanks and Regards Alok Mohapatra ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Dial plan Question
Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 02:29 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton: I am trying to do something that I see describe in a book and it is not working In my sip.conf, I have in my [fxo] context=from-pstn I then have in extensions.conf [from-pstn] exten s,1,answer() exten s,2,playback(blah) etc. It never answers but if I do this [from-pstn] exten _x.,1,answer() exten _x.,2,playback(blah) it works. Why does the 's' extension not work here? If fxo means your SIP provider, and you register with him, a specific extension will be called. Which one shall be called can be selected by the last parameter of the register statement, e.g. register = 075741:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060/492281234567 will cause the incoming calls to appear in extension 492281234567. Comes in handy if you have several accounts with a single SIP provider: This way, you can simply distinguish the outward phone number for which the call came in. BR Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Upgrading sox
Hi, I'm currently running an * version 1.2.13 and sox version 12.17.5. I want to upgrade sox to the newest release ( 12.18.2 ); need mp3 support. But how do I make the upgrade. Do I need to recompile asterisk afterwards? If I make a sox -h after a reboot I can see the new version is running but is that enough? _ Log på MSN Messenger direkte på nettet http://webmessenger.msn.com/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Mapping CLI'S in Dialplan
Hi All I am not sure what I wish to do it possible but I would like to see if you guys know any better. I have a site who has the extensions: 1231, 1232. 1233, 1234 Each of these users can dial each other on the extension number an also has an external CLI mapped to them. On all internal calls or calls to services such as call forwarding their Caller ID is: Name What I would like to have happen is have the Caller ID changed to the CLI only when they make an offnet call. So what I am saying is I need to match an extension to a CLI and reset the Caller ID. Many Thanks SP ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Mapping CLI'S in Dialplan
Your offnet calls will be more than 4 digits, so use that to ur advantage. so, for internal calls, exten = _,1,Set(CALLERID(all)=Name ${CALLERID(num)}) or if u dont want to change the CLID at all.. dont do anything.. exten = _,1,NoOp(nothing) else, for all external calls(4 digits) exten = _X.,1,Set(CALLERID(num)=urDID) cheerz - Ben. Scott Pinhorne wrote: Hi All I am not sure what I wish to do it possible but I would like to see if you guys know any better. I have a site who has the extensions: 1231, 1232. 1233, 1234 Each of these users can dial each other on the extension number an also has an external CLI mapped to them. On all internal calls or calls to services such as call forwarding their Caller ID is: Name What I would like to have happen is have the Caller ID changed to the CLI only when they make an offnet call. So what I am saying is I need to match an extension to a CLI and reset the Caller ID. Many Thanks SP ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Upgrading sox
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 11:14:43AM +0100, René Christensen wrote: Hi, I'm currently running an * version 1.2.13 and sox version 12.17.5. I want to upgrade sox to the newest release ( 12.18.2 ); need mp3 support. But how do I make the upgrade. Do I need to recompile asterisk afterwards? No. Asterisk is not linked with sox. If I make a sox -h after a reboot I can see the new version is running but is that enough? A reboot should not be needed either. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Pass through
Hi!Then please just tell me if it's even possible, as i cannot find any configuration to allow unknown codecs to be used in reinvited calls .My question is that is it possible or impossible to handle this with asterisk?Thanks!AndrásOn 11/5/06, Szabó András [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi!I want to tell asterisk to simply pass-through any codecs that my phones support. I have to use codecs that are not popular and implemented by a third-party, asterisk has nothing to do with them. I've made a test with g722 (that asterisk doesn't support), i've set all my two snom 300 phones to support only g722 and asterisk declined the sip invitation. That is bad for me. Is it possible that asterisk asks the called phone not the codecs that asterisk supports but the codecs that the calling phone supports? What i want:phone1-asterisk: hello, i'm calling phone2, codecs possible: g722asterisk-phone2: hello, you have a call from phone1, codecs possible: g722phone2-asterisk: ok, let it be g722 ... chit chat ...But asterisk does this:phone1-asterisk: hello, i'm calling phone2, codecs possible: g722asterisk-phone2: hello, you have a call from phone1, codecs possible: alaw, ulaw etc. (but not g722) phone2-asterisk: no way, media not supported! (cannot agree in a codec)asterisk-phone1: beep beep beepAny ideas? Is it possible? Is it not possible?I've searched over voip-info.org, asterisk docs and coundn't find anything about the exact configuration.Thanks!András ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Queue time out
Hello I have set the time out to 30s in queue.conf, but my agent has called 2 times, and the next extension(the Hangup) is called after 60s. do you think that it is normal? On asterisk console i have these messages: -- Executing Queue(SIP/1-0cf8, queue|tn) in new stack -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/1-0cf8 -- Called SIP/adriana -- Nobody picked up in 3 ms -- Called SIP/adriana -- Nobody picked up in 3 ms -- Exiting on time-out cycle -- Executing Hangup(SIP/1-0cf8, ) in new stack My config are: queues.conf [queue] music=default strategy=ringall timeout=30 maxlen=1 context=mbdsys announce-frequency=0 announce-holdtime=no joinempty=strict member = SIP/adriana,1 extension.conf --- exten= 999,1,Answer() exten= 999,2,Queue(queue|tn) exten= 999,3,Hangup() thank you. Rachid ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk + E1 with MFC/R2 in Argentina?
Yes, Telefonica is able to do PRI but just in a very restrictive area. RR Libera Ilan Rabinovitch escribió: We briefly used it with iPlan, but found that there were some problems with the stock asterisk implementation and Argentina variation of R2. We ended up convincing iPlan to switch us to PRI. As soon as we switched to PRI all problems disappeared. Any idea if Telefonica will be able to do PRI instead of R2? On 10/11/06, R.R. Libera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Has somebody installed this configuration: Asterisk + E1 with MFC/R2 (Telefónica Argentina) in Argentina before? I need to know if it´s possible with MFC/R2 argentine variation. Thanks in advance. R.R. Libera ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Problem: 2 second silence at the beginning of most calls
I have the following setup in my test lab (which reflects very much my production installation, just on a smaller scale) Asterisk server - Internet -- Home router (Linksys) ---Hub Polycom 501 (Phone A) |--- Polycom 501 (Phone B) All calls go through my asterisk server, even if its from one Polycom to the other. If I dial from phone A to phone B, audio doesnt get passed for the first 1-2 seconds. I end up saying "hello? hello? hello?" and eventually I heard something. It makes for a bad user experience. What can be the problem? I imagine the NAT isnt the problem, or there would be no audio at all. My Asterisk is running 1.2.4, and my Polycom phones at running bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1 (fairly recent). Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Queue time out
What settings are you using when you call the queue? Ie in the extensions.conf I have the below, this keeps calls in the queue for 30mins (1800 secs). If you adjust it to 30, the call will come out of the queue in 30secs and move onto the next dialplan. exten = 8000,3,Queue(fservices1800) Regards, Dean. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of rachid Sent: 07 November 2006 12:19 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Queue time out Hello I have set the time out to 30s in queue.conf, but my agent has called 2 times, and the next extension(the Hangup) is called after 60s. do you think that it is normal? On asterisk console i have these messages: -- Executing Queue(SIP/1-0cf8, queue|tn) in new stack -- Started music on hold, class 'default', on SIP/1-0cf8 -- Called SIP/adriana -- Nobody picked up in 3 ms -- Called SIP/adriana -- Nobody picked up in 3 ms -- Exiting on time-out cycle -- Executing Hangup(SIP/1-0cf8, ) in new stack My config are: queues.conf [queue] music=default strategy=ringall timeout=30 maxlen=1 context=mbdsys announce-frequency=0 announce-holdtime=no joinempty=strict member = SIP/adriana,1 extension.conf --- exten= 999,1,Answer() exten= 999,2,Queue(queue|tn) exten= 999,3,Hangup() thank you. Rachid ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Problem: 2 second silence at the beginning of mostcalls
I was wondering whether you have canreinvite=yes on those phones, and that the audio between the phones is working, but not between the Asterisk server and the phones - perhaps an Ethereal trace from your Hub might help? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: 07 November 2006 12:42To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [asterisk-users] Problem: 2 second silence at the beginning of mostcalls I have the following setup in my test lab (which reflects very much my production installation, just on a smaller scale) Asterisk server - Internet -- Home router (Linksys) ---Hub Polycom 501 (Phone A) |--- Polycom 501 (Phone B) All calls go through my asterisk server, even if its from one Polycom to the other. If I dial from phone A to phone B, audio doesnt get passed for the first 1-2 seconds. I end up saying "hello? hello? hello?" and eventually I heard something. It makes for a bad user experience. What can be the problem? I imagine the NAT isnt the problem, or there would be no audio at all. My Asterisk is running 1.2.4, and my Polycom phones at running bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1 (fairly recent). Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] names of SIP aware firewalls
I have always been happy with Snapgear units. Most also have hardware based Encryption acceleration for IPSec and PPTP VPNs. As for setting up with SIP, use a VPN, or call their tech support line and they'll help you. Each unit comes with support for setup built-in last I checked.www.snapgear.comTom On Nov 6, 2006, at 6:24 PM, joe a. wrote:An open source firewall:www.ipcop.org lots of add ons, including a fairly new sip proxy:http://mh-lantech.css-hamburg.de/ipcop/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1847.5I think well of IPcop and the gent who did the add on, but have no experience with that particular one.joe a.___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Tom RymesCascade Link Systemswww.cascadelinksystems.com(603) 375-1414"Intelligent technology solutions for small businesses." ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Problem: 2 second silence at the beginning ofmostcalls
I _had_ canreinvite=yes, before I read your post. My production environement though cannot handle reinvites (all phones are behind different NATs, too messy). So I've set those to canreinvite=no. Unfortunately, it's not making a difference. I still get the 1-2 seconds silence at the beginning of my calls. My Asterisk server is not behind a NAT, so in theory it should work flawlessly. Also, the latency between my LAN and my Asterisk server is about 10ms, very stable. I am trying to figure it out with Ethereal (first thing I did) but I'm not sure what to look for. Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve LangstaffSent: November 7, 2006 8:08 AMTo: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: RE: [asterisk-users] Problem: 2 second silence at the beginning ofmostcalls I was wondering whether you have canreinvite=yes on those phones, and that the audio between the phones is working, but not between the Asterisk server and the phones - perhaps an Ethereal trace from your Hub might help? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: 07 November 2006 12:42To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [asterisk-users] Problem: 2 second silence at the beginning of mostcalls I have the following setup in my test lab (which reflects very much my production installation, just on a smaller scale) Asterisk server - Internet -- Home router (Linksys) ---Hub Polycom 501 (Phone A) |--- Polycom 501 (Phone B) All calls go through my asterisk server, even if its from one Polycom to the other. If I dial from phone A to phone B, audio doesnt get passed for the first 1-2 seconds. I end up saying "hello? hello? hello?" and eventually I heard something. It makes for a bad user experience. What can be the problem? I imagine the NAT isnt the problem, or there would be no audio at all. My Asterisk is running 1.2.4, and my Polycom phones at running bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1 (fairly recent). Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk SMS: Experience with EMS?
Hello *, I recently started playing around with the SMS application. Several of my SIP clients are FritzBoxes, with SMS capable DECT phones connected via ISDN or analog line. So far, SMSing works great: I defined extension 0193010[01] to receive SMSes, which works well with the default settings for German phones. Incoming SMS in the morx queue will be parsed by a cronjob and forwarded either to the recipient or to the local handler (e.g. SMS recipient 118 is the enquiries line, where phone book lookups can be got from; call forwarding settings can be queried by texting to extension 999 etc). It's marvellous. But I would like to send EMS, especially bitmap files for the phones here that in theory allow pictures and tones to be updated via SMS. I found some EMS specs, but all that leaves me without too much clue. Has anyone got SMS working to send bitmaps and tones to phones? Thanks, Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk
*bump* Anyone? On 11/6/06, Curt Shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to add what we have both seen on traffic captures. You see Caller 1's RTP stream. Call 2 comes in and you see the creation of its RTP stream. After Call 2 is put on hold the RTP stream from Caller 1 disappears without a trace never to return and this is when the one way audio is happening. And I also wanted to add that I am running 1.4.0 firmware for this phone. Thanks again! -Original Message- From: Curt Shaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:58 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk I'm the friend mentioned here. I am using the Aastra 480i CT. It is SIP to my PBX and IAX termination from the PBX to my provider. My issue has a slight twist to it but the same result. For instance his is always where as mine is frequent but not always. After I got to finally see it first hand today, I had to start over from Caller 1 5 times to get it to happen again. Caller 1 calls in and Person A answers. Caller 2 calls in and Person B answers. Person B puts caller 2 on hold and audio drops on Caller 1. So Person A can hear caller 1 but caller 1 cannot hear Person A. This happens more often when Call 1 is on the handset and Call 2 is on the portable or vis a vi, but this is not always the case. It does happen to 1 set only but just less frequent. I have tried carrierinvite=yes and no but this does not change the issue. The phones are behind a router but the external IP of the router is on the same network as the * box. Thanks! Curt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:35 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk Hi, Some odd behaviour here. A friend and I were talking tonight, and it seems we have both seen the same problem. We are both using aastra phones (I am using 9113is).We have a connection to and from providers via SIP and IAX.When I place a call on the local hold of the phone, and then pick them back up I can hear them, but they can not hear me.However, if I park the call, and then pick it up again, the audio is fine. Tonight I tried placing a call on hold using a Sipura/Linksys ATA (that is just hitting 'flash', which basically puts the call on local hold and starts music).The problem did not manifest itself. Has anyone else had this issue? Do you have a fix for it? It is an astrisk issue or an aastra issue? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen
My company has had a few screens go out on us, but all of those were completely blank. I'm not sure if we just got a bad batch or what, but the Snom phones are usually a solid piece of hardware. I'd try to RMA it. Nick Hoffman wrote: Hi guys. I just bought and configured a Snom 360 and have noticed that the LCD is constantly flickering at a rate of ~10-15Hz (that's a guess). Either way, it's very distracting. Has anyone else encountered this before? Any solutions? Cheers, -- Nick E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588 F: +61 7 5591 6588 If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make any use of the email. We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality or copyright associated with it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk
Matt, I haven't heard of this happening elsewhere, but I don't hear of every issue with the phones. It sounds to me that you've got more than enough information to raise a case with our support team. Gareth -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: 07 November, 2006 8:31 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk *bump* Anyone? On 11/6/06, Curt Shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to add what we have both seen on traffic captures. You see Caller 1's RTP stream. Call 2 comes in and you see the creation of its RTP stream. After Call 2 is put on hold the RTP stream from Caller 1 disappears without a trace never to return and this is when the one way audio is happening. And I also wanted to add that I am running 1.4.0 firmware for this phone. Thanks again! -Original Message- From: Curt Shaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:58 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk I'm the friend mentioned here. I am using the Aastra 480i CT. It is SIP to my PBX and IAX termination from the PBX to my provider. My issue has a slight twist to it but the same result. For instance his is always where as mine is frequent but not always. After I got to finally see it first hand today, I had to start over from Caller 1 5 times to get it to happen again. Caller 1 calls in and Person A answers. Caller 2 calls in and Person B answers. Person B puts caller 2 on hold and audio drops on Caller 1. So Person A can hear caller 1 but caller 1 cannot hear Person A. This happens more often when Call 1 is on the handset and Call 2 is on the portable or vis a vi, but this is not always the case. It does happen to 1 set only but just less frequent. I have tried carrierinvite=yes and no but this does not change the issue. The phones are behind a router but the external IP of the router is on the same network as the * box. Thanks! Curt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:35 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk Hi, Some odd behaviour here. A friend and I were talking tonight, and it seems we have both seen the same problem. We are both using aastra phones (I am using 9113is).We have a connection to and from providers via SIP and IAX.When I place a call on the local hold of the phone, and then pick them back up I can hear them, but they can not hear me.However, if I park the call, and then pick it up again, the audio is fine. Tonight I tried placing a call on hold using a Sipura/Linksys ATA (that is just hitting 'flash', which basically puts the call on local hold and starts music).The problem did not manifest itself. Has anyone else had this issue? Do you have a fix for it? It is an astrisk issue or an aastra issue? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Follow Me problems
Today we appear to have discovered our first bug. We have an extension setup to followme by ringing that extension + an external cell # (ringall). If nobody answers after 20 seconds the destination if no answer is set to go to the extensions voicemail in the followme module. The problem is it just keeps ringing forever. If we delete the followme it forwards to the voicemail as per the default SIP extension configuration with voicemail enabled. Anyone run into this? Is there a workaround? Any advice would be greatly appreciated as always. Our configuration is: Supermicro Pentium D 2.66 Server with 2x512MB Memory 3ware 8006-2LP Hardware RAID 1 Sangoma A200D with 8fxo (latest firmware/drivers as of last week) CentOS 4.4 Asterisk 1.2.13 Zaptel 1.2.10 FreePBX 2.1.3 When Asterisk dial the Cell phone, it goes out on the ZAP channel (Sangoma A200D), so as soon as it hit that channel, the call is considered answered even if the cell phone never actually pickup the call. I didn't play with the followme module myself but that is what I suspect is happening. Just watch the console and you should see something like Zap/1-1 answered ... hth ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] My Phone Review- Large Scale Corp Deployment.
Honestly they are not that bad. When they first came out they were very buggy, but about 6 months ago I pulled one out and updated the firmware and actually over a few days was reliable. On 11/7/06, RR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/2/06, Eddie Johnson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Matthew, Did you test Snom or Sipura hard ip phones?I was considering Budgetone for an office of 10 users.After reading your testimonial I will have to re-think my selection.FWIW, after having played with 3-4 BudgeTone phones on 3-4 separateoccasions, out of which 2 actually just died the very next day (came to work to find them, again on seperate occasions, with LCDs clearedout with greenish-blue tint, the speaker light lit and No Tone),that's when I concluded that the BudgeTone is surely Budget but NoTone! ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Dial plan Question
Thanks, that set off a light bulb In my spa3K my incoming dialplan was set to (S0:405) Since this is a one FXO unit and my [from-pstn] will always be that line can I make it generic and use the 's' extension as I described? If so what would that spa3k dialplan be? just s0 ? Doug On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 02:29 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton: I am trying to do something that I see describe in a book and it is not working In my sip.conf, I have in my [fxo] context=from-pstn I then have in extensions.conf [from-pstn] exten s,1,answer() exten s,2,playback(blah) etc. It never answers but if I do this [from-pstn] exten _x.,1,answer() exten _x.,2,playback(blah) it works. Why does the 's' extension not work here? If fxo means your SIP provider, and you register with him, a specific extension will be called. Which one shall be called can be selected by the last parameter of the register statement, e.g. register = 075741:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060/492281234567 will cause the incoming calls to appear in extension 492281234567. Comes in handy if you have several accounts with a single SIP provider: This way, you can simply distinguish the outward phone number for which the call came in. BR Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307* * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Follow Me problems
I asked on freenode #asterisk a while ago about the followme and someone was nice enough to share a macro with me that I'm using (although I use voip outbound instead of zap, but it may be worth trying): MYPHONE=IAX2/666 MYOUT=SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED] MYEXT=666 exten = 9,1,Macro(voicemail,${MYPHONE},${MYOUT},${MYEXT}) [macro-voicemail] exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG1},25,r) exten = s,2,Goto(s-${DIALSTATUS},1) exten = s-NOANSWER,1,Setvar(NewCaller=${CALLERIDNUM}) exten = s-NOANSWER,2,Set(CALLERID(number)=${CALLERIDNUM}) exten = s-NOANSWER,3,Dial(${ARG2},15,r) exten = s-NOANSWER,4,Set(CALLERID(number)=${NewCaller}) exten = s-NOANSWER,5,Voicemail(u${ARG3}) exten = s-NOANSWER,6,Hangup exten = s-BUSY,1,Voicemail(b${ARG3}) exten = s-BUSY,2,Hangup exten = _s-.,1,Goto(s-NOANSWER,1) Time Bandit wrote: Today we appear to have discovered our first bug. We have an extension setup to followme by ringing that extension + an external cell # (ringall). If nobody answers after 20 seconds the destination if no answer is set to go to the extensions voicemail in the followme module. The problem is it just keeps ringing forever. If we delete the followme it forwards to the voicemail as per the default SIP extension configuration with voicemail enabled. Anyone run into this? Is there a workaround? Any advice would be greatly appreciated as always. Our configuration is: Supermicro Pentium D 2.66 Server with 2x512MB Memory 3ware 8006-2LP Hardware RAID 1 Sangoma A200D with 8fxo (latest firmware/drivers as of last week) CentOS 4.4 Asterisk 1.2.13 Zaptel 1.2.10 FreePBX 2.1.3 When Asterisk dial the Cell phone, it goes out on the ZAP channel (Sangoma A200D), so as soon as it hit that channel, the call is considered answered even if the cell phone never actually pickup the call. I didn't play with the followme module myself but that is what I suspect is happening. Just watch the console and you should see something like Zap/1-1 answered ... hth ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] capiAnswerFax
Hello, Anyone knows if chan_capi-0.7.1 includes the patch to support capiAnswerFax? I tried to apply this patch (from http://www.mlkj.net/asterisk/) but it give me errors... Also i tried define one extension for fax receptions but this dont works: exten = 1,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) exten = fax,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) [handle_fax] exten = s,1,capiAnswerFax(/tmp/${UNIQUEID}) exten = s,2,Hangup() With this code, a fax call to DID 1 must be attended and the fax stored in /tmp, right? This not works... :( Thanks for any kind of possible help... PS. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Mapping CLI'S in Dialplan
Hi Thanks for reply but that wasnt quite what i was trying to explain :-) Bascially a users callerID would be their extension. On offnet calls i needed to have the callerID reset as their DDI rather than their internal extension. I endup using a mysql command in the dialplan to pull out a ddi based on the extension and the re-wrote me callerID when making offnet calls. thanks sp -Original message- From: Benjamin Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 05:24:21 -0600 To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Mapping CLI'S in Dialplan Your offnet calls will be more than 4 digits, so use that to ur advantage. so, for internal calls, exten = _,1,Set(CALLERID(all)=Name ${CALLERID(num)}) or if u dont want to change the CLID at all.. dont do anything.. exten = _,1,NoOp(nothing) else, for all external calls(4 digits) exten = _X.,1,Set(CALLERID(num)=urDID) cheerz - Ben. Scott Pinhorne wrote: Hi All I am not sure what I wish to do it possible but I would like to see if you guys know any better. I have a site who has the extensions: 1231, 1232. 1233, 1234 Each of these users can dial each other on the extension number an also has an external CLI mapped to them. On all internal calls or calls to services such as call forwarding their Caller ID is: Name What I would like to have happen is have the Caller ID changed to the CLI only when they make an offnet call. So what I am saying is I need to match an extension to a CLI and reset the Caller ID. Many Thanks SP ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] capiAnswerFax
On 15:03, Tue 07 Nov 06, Pedro Silva wrote: Hello, Anyone knows if chan_capi-0.7.1 includes the patch to support capiAnswerFax? I tried to apply this patch (from http://www.mlkj.net/asterisk/) but it give me errors... Also i tried define one extension for fax receptions but this dont works: exten = 1,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) exten = fax,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) [handle_fax] exten = s,1,capiAnswerFax(/tmp/${UNIQUEID}) exten = s,2,Hangup() With this code, a fax call to DID 1 must be attended and the fax stored in /tmp, right? This not works... :( Thanks for any kind of possible help... PS. Hi, The chan_capi you mention already has fax support. Here is the handle_fax context I use with the latest released chan_capi-cm [handle_fax] exten = s,1,SetVar(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/${UNIQUEID}) exten = s,n,capicommand(receivefax|${FAXFILE}) exten = h,1,DeadAgi(faxreceive.php|${FAXFILE}) Good luck -- Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] How do I make this stop? (Bridging of IAX channels?)
-- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/peer1-iax-7 and IAX2/peer2-21 I want everything to stay in the VoIP server rather then briding. I have notransfer=yes on, but it still seems to bridge the call natively.. can I keep the RTP stream on the asterisk server some how? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] capiAnswerFax
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Pedro Silva wrote: Hello, Anyone knows if chan_capi-0.7.1 includes the patch to support capiAnswerFax? This patch is not added to chan-capi.org, but receivefax and sendfax is available via capicommand(). Please see README of chan-capi 0.7.x package. Armin I tried to apply this patch (from http://www.mlkj.net/asterisk/) but it give me errors... Also i tried define one extension for fax receptions but this dont works: exten = 1,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) exten = fax,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) [handle_fax] exten = s,1,capiAnswerFax(/tmp/${UNIQUEID}) exten = s,2,Hangup() With this code, a fax call to DID 1 must be attended and the fax stored in /tmp, right? This not works... :( Thanks for any kind of possible help... PS. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] failed to authenticate on invite
I have 2 asterisk boxes connected via SIP box 1 sip peer connected to box 2 (ip addresses intentionally removed) [ast20] type=friend host=x.x.x.20 insecure=very context=subscriber dtmfmode=inband qualify=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw box 2 sip peer connected to box 1 [sbb19] type=friend host=64.1.8.19 insecure=very context=inbound dtmfmode=inband qualify=yes canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw I then have 2 UAs registed on box 1, both have identical configs with the exception of username, but one is a Polycom IP501 and the other is a Linksys PAP2 The IP 501 can call to box 2 with no issues, also calls originated on a PRI connected to box 1 connect to box 2 with no issues. The Linksys UA can not call box 2, here is the error (numbers intentionally removed); -- Executing dial(SIP/##0850-b6669f58, SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nov 7 07:20:45 NOTICE[21059]: chan_sip.c:9709 handle_response_invite: Failed to authenticate on INVITE to 'name removed sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=as38826922' -- SIP/ast20-09c8b110 is circuit-busy == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/1/0) I have looked at sip debugs from both scenarios, and the invites from box 1 to box 2 look nearly identical, box 2 never shows the call when it fails. I am assuming that there is something that needs to be changed on the ATA or peer config to get it to be able to call via box1 to box2 without requiring authentication, but can not figure out what. Any ideas? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen
I had a problem with snom where the screen went completly blank. Snom told me there was an issue where that the cable going from the phone board to the screen would fall out. I opend the phone and sliped it back in. - Original Message - From: Nick Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users Mailing List asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:53 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen Hi guys. I just bought and configured a Snom 360 and have noticed that the LCD is constantly flickering at a rate of ~10-15Hz (that's a guess). Either way, it's very distracting. Has anyone else encountered this before? Any solutions? Cheers, -- Nick E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588 F: +61 7 5591 6588 If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make any use of the email. We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality or copyright associated with it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] capiAnswerFax
Excellent, Michiel! This works :) You know what kind of file it is created (SFF)? Can you send to me the example faxreceive.php? Thanks and best regards! PS. 2006/11/7, Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 15:03, Tue 07 Nov 06, Pedro Silva wrote: Hello, Anyone knows if chan_capi-0.7.1 includes the patch to support capiAnswerFax? I tried to apply this patch (from http://www.mlkj.net/asterisk/) but it give me errors... Also i tried define one extension for fax receptions but this dont works: exten = 1,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) exten = fax,1,Goto(handle_fax,s,1) [handle_fax] exten = s,1,capiAnswerFax(/tmp/${UNIQUEID}) exten = s,2,Hangup() With this code, a fax call to DID 1 must be attended and the fax stored in /tmp, right? This not works... :( Thanks for any kind of possible help... PS. Hi, The chan_capi you mention already has fax support. Here is the handle_fax context I use with the latest released chan_capi-cm [handle_fax] exten = s,1,SetVar(FAXFILE=/var/spool/asterisk/fax/${UNIQUEID}) exten = s,n,capicommand(receivefax|${FAXFILE}) exten = h,1,DeadAgi(faxreceive.php|${FAXFILE}) Good luck -- Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] hicecaller ID
Hi all ! I have a question regarding flexible callerid setting using the misdn I want to acheive the following: when starting a call with 0 I want to display CALLERID (which is setup right now) but when I start the call with 9 I want the callerid to be surpressed. How can this be done? nik ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] connect Sipura with Asterisk - both behind NAT
Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather (especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link explaining how to setup Linux server -- #Joseph ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Generating Recall/Flash using Zaptel
HiI'm trying to generate a Recall/Flash on an FXO (TDM400) connected to a PABX and failing at the moment. I was using the Flash application, which seems to generate a hook flash as opposed to a Recall. Debugging the Zap channel output using a second FXS channel gives me the following [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [Zap/1-1] [ TYPE: DTMF (1) SUBCLASS: 1 (49) ] [Zap/1-1]when I press Recall on the type of phone I'm trying to mimic and [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [Zap/1-1] [ TYPE: Control (4) SUBCLASS: Flash (9) ] [Zap/1-1]when I use the Flash application. I have 3 questions which I'd greatly appreciate answers to1) Is it possible to generate the [ TYPE: Null Frame (5) SUBCLASS: N/A (0) ] [Zap/1-1]only using a Zap channel? 2) If it is, is there an easy way to do this, or do I have to delve into zaptel / asterisk code?3) If I have to delve into asterisk code, which areas should I be looking at? As a newbie to the whole zaptel architecture and asterisk code base who is on a rather tight schedule if I have to go this route then any pointers as to where I should be looking and what I should be doing would be hugely appreciatedI've searched high and low and can't seem to find answers to any of these questions. ThanksDululu ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Reading Voicemail Config from MySQL [+ ODBC]
On 11/6/06, Mosiuoa Tsietsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, After some more searching I decided to try USING unix ODBC for the connection. I have both the unixODBC and unixODBC-devel packages on my fedora box: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# rpm -qa | grep -i unixodbc unixODBC-2.2.11-7.1 unixODBC-devel-2.2.11-7.1 Here are my odbcinsi.ini and odbc.ini files respectively: [MySQL] Description = ODBC for MySQL Driver = /usr/lib/libmyodbc.so Setup = /usr/lib/libodbcmyS.so FileUsage = 1 --- [MYSQL-asterisk] Driver = MySQL Description = Data source for dynamic asterisk voicemail configuration Trace = Yes TraceFile = stderr SERVER = localhost USER = root PASSWORD = rootroot9 PORT = 3306 DATABASE = asterisk - Below are my res_odbc.conf and extconfig.conf files for supplying details of the DSN name and and database/table for asterisk [mysql1] enabled = yes dsn = MySQL-asterisk username = root password = *** pre-connect = yes --- [settings] voicemail = odbc,mysql1,users --- I am able to execute: [EMAIL PROTECTED] /]# isql -v MySQL-asterisk +---+ | Connected!| | | | sql-statement | | help [tablename] | | quit | | | +---+ SQL which shows I can connect to the database on the command line using my DSN name. In the asterisk CLI however, the command: asterisk*CLI odbc show No such command 'odbc' (type 'help' for help) fails which is supposed to show connections to MySQL from the CLI. ANd lastly the command: asterisk*CLI realtime load voicemail mailbox 7521 No rows found matching search criteria. Nov 6 00:33:10 WARNING[2965]: config.c:920 find_engine: Realtime mapping for 'voicemail' found to engine 'odbc', but the engine is not available also fails. Where are I going wrong? Thanks. Mate, doesn't sound like you have the res_odbc.so module loaded. Make sure in /etc/asterisk/modules.conf you have a load = res_odbc.so or on the CLI type load res_odbc.so and then give it a whirl. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Audiocodes MP-114 noise
Jason,First, before you start reading, get to the latest firmware from Audiocodes (MP118_SIP_F4.80A.034.004.cmp), there have been significant echo improvements in this version.After many days of working with Audiocodes on this problem and much time spent here by multiple technicians trying to reproduce and resolve this issue; this morning, Atacomm received an email from Audiocodes with a full explanation to this now confirmed issue with all MP-11x units. Atacomm will immediately begin work on a KB article within our website that confirms this issue and outlines the manufacturer recommended steps to resolve this problem.Apparently, there have been some changes with the MP-11x's that can negatively affect line noise and echo. Below are some steps which can help to correct these problems:1. The new design did away with the Coefficent file. Audiocodes, now instead, introduced a configurable parameter called countrycoefficient. This parameter can be adjusted to a specific country based on known configurations. For the most part this should work. 70(USA) is the default value. More can be found in the User’s manual.2. In just about every case, an FXO is added to a Pre-existing PBX or CO line, you can expect echo. This comes from the fact that delay (IP Network) is being introduced, and what used to be Side tone is now delayed so much it is echo. Just about every difference on the line that can be heard between the pre fxo and post fxo installation can be traced to echo, or line quality issues.3. Going forward, Audiocodes would like to suggest that when installing the product do the following:A) Make sure the Line coming from the PBX or CO is a Loop Start line. Ground start is not supported on the MP-11x series of gateways. (The M1K FXO will in 5.0)B) Check that the Line can deliver for a 600 Ohm Impedance line-52 to -24 V of Off Hook Voltage-15 to -6 V of On Hook Voltage20 to 35 ma of loop current.If you know the line is not 600 Ohm, please gather metrics on the line, and the make and model of the PBX or switch it is attached too, plus country of origin. If it is not from the USA, please look up the country of origin and then find the CountryCoefficient to match this. Load the .ini file to the board with this setting and reset. Make sure the Gateway has a firmware version of 4.60.035 or higher or 4.80.030 or higher.C) Put the device on the network with Voice Volume set to 0 and input gain set to 0. Make calls, if there is no issue, you can stop here. However, Echo is still expected most of the time.D) The echo should be heard by the IP side participant as their voice is reflected back. If this is the case, then what needs to be done is to lower the voicevolume (IP—TEL). This way the speaker’s reflected voice will comeback low enough for the ECAN to cancel it out (-6 is usually recommended as the value to plug in here). A little experimentation is needed as the loss for all lines will vary based on length from the CO. Echo is usually taken care of in this manner.E) The incoming speaker from the PSTN’s voice seems low, set InputGainLocation =1, and then slowly increment the Input Gain Parameter(TelàIP) to adjust for this. In past releases (see the note about loads above), the input gain was always applied prior to the ECAN which had the effect of amplifying the returned echo and noise on the line causing crosstalk and clipping issues. This is no longer the case.If the above does not resolve the issues, then you need to go ahead and collect DSP, Ethereal and Syslog traces along with the board.ini, these are to be sent to your support agent, who will then send these to Audiocodes for their engineers to evaluate. This should not happen often.Jessee HolmesAtacomm / Ataractic Corporationwww.atacomm.comV: 1-877-700-VOIP[EMAIL PROTECTED]Looking for voice over IP products? Visit our VoIP store at http://voipstore.atacomm.com/On Nov 3, 2006, at 12:14 AM, Jason Kim wrote:Jessee,I tried many combinations of "Voice Volume", "InputGain" and packetization time , but it's noisy steel.I'm using G.711A-law and packetization time is 20ms.It can be impedance mismatch problem but i cannotadjust impedance of FXO port of MP-114.___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] operator console
Andres, The Bicom Systems Operator Panel is probably what you are looking for. OPCOM http://www.bicomsystems.com/docs/opcom/1.0/html/ This is included with every copy of PBXware and is fully supported. If you care to register you may order a trial of PBXware with our SOHO. Regards Steve steve 'at' bicomsystems 'dot' com - Original Message - From: Andres Paglayan To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:27 PM Subject: [asterisk-users] operator console Hi, My users are currently using an operator console interface like this: see it at: http://www.whssf.org/interface.jpg which came with a Praxon PDX we got about 5 years ago, which is now unsupported, it works very good and converts any analog phone plugged into the system into a powerful console, (provided you have a computer next to it) you just provide the box ip, user login, user pass, and extension, and voila. I'll be switching the company's phone system to Asterisk. I know * is way much more flexible and rich featured than the box we currently have, ...but I'll need to give the users a good mean to see what's going on, who is busy, easy transfer with click here and there, easy conference, easy queue handler, easy way to see/use many lines at the same time is there any best console they can use? I don't mind using a commercial product, if the only part we have to pay for is the gui, besides, we will buying the enterprise * version Thanks a bunch, Andres ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] g729
Does digium have a g723 codec can work pass thru mode * No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure belonging to Xplorium. If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or disclose its content to any other person. Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects. * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] my future count on this please help
Dear How can I charge the incoming call to the destination call ,using a2billing I used to make setaccount but it didnt work such a loopback detected am using context=default for incoming calls I Please help Thanks * No employee or agent is authorized to conclude any binding agreement on behalf of Xplorium with another party by e-mail without express written confirmation by an officer of Xplorium. Any views expressed by an individual in this electronic message do not necessarily reflect views of Xplorium or its subsidiaries and associates. This electronic message and its attachments are solely addressed to the addressee(s), and contain confidential information protected from disclosure belonging to Xplorium. If you are not the intended addressee of this electronic message and its attachments, kindly delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender by electronic mail. You must not copy this message or attachment or disclose its content to any other person. Xplorium does not guarantee the integrity of this electronic message and any of its attachments, or that they are free from computer viruses or other defects. * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Grandstream TFTP system wide settings
Hi, Aastra IP Phones have two configuration files on TFTP, aastra.cfg and mac.cfg. Both are in text format, which makes editing easy. And aastra.cfg has system wide settings and mac.cfg has settings for each indivifual phones. This makes it really easy to change the global parameters system wide by changing only one aastra.cfg file. On the other hand, as I could understand, for Grandstream TFTP setup, each phones needs a separate file, which has to be edited and then converted to its own format usint ./encode.sh. There is no such file which would carry global settings for all the phones on a system. Changing 10s of configuration files for one small little thing, like daylight saving = 0, and then converting all of them to its own format is not a good way of dealing with many phones. Is there a quicker way to change settings for all Grandstream phones, is there any one file which can act as a global configuration file without changing each phones phone specific settings? And can't it be simply done by text editing, without the need to convert each file to cfgmac format? -- Zeeshan A Zakaria ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] How do I make this stop? (Bridging of IAX channels?)
Matt wrote: -- Attempting native bridge of IAX2/peer1-iax-7 and IAX2/peer2-21 I want everything to stay in the VoIP server rather then briding. I have notransfer=yes on, but it still seems to bridge the call natively.. can I keep the RTP stream on the asterisk server some how? Asterisk is still going to try to native bridge the two channels. Once this occurs chan_iax2 is going to notice that you don't want a native transfer to happen and not do it. -- Joshua Colp Software Developer Digium, Inc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] g729
Khaled wrote: Does digium have a g723 codec can work pass thru mode You don't need a codec loaded to do passthru, Asterisk just needs to know about the codec (which it does in the case of G723.1). If things are properly configured and codec negotiation happens the right way, it should just work. -- Joshua Colp Software Developer Digium, Inc. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] g729
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:06:21AM -0800, Khaled wrote: Does digium have a g723 codec can work pass thru mode Digium does not provide a g723 codec. However to work in pass-through mode you don't need a codec. A codec is used when transcoding the stream. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Queues and multiple lines
Say I have agents using a softphone like eyebeam that has 6 lines. They log in to the queue. Say there are 3 agents in my queue. 3 calls come in and all three agents are on a call. Now a fourth call comes in. Is it possible to have it setup so that the 4 call rings on line 2 of one of my agents, if they don't get it within the time limit it rings on line 2 of another agent and so on. An agent can then put their current call on hold and go to the new call, say something like thanks for calling please hold, then go back to their first call, finish it up and then go back to the second call. I hope that made sense. I'm sure there is a way to get it done, but how flexible is the current queue system in Asterisk with stuff like this? -- Michael Sampson Information Systems Manager Customer Contact Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 952-936-4000 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] capiAnswerFax
On 15:34, Tue 07 Nov 06, Pedro Silva wrote: Excellent, Michiel! This works :) You know what kind of file it is created (SFF)? Can you send to me the example faxreceive.php? Thanks and best regards! PS. Hi, Glad it worked. The generated file is a 'Structured Fax File' The faxreceive.php is not that important in this case. All it does is lookup customer that sends the fax in our CRM application and moves the faxfile to the binary datastore of our CRM application. But if you're still interested here is the subversion view of it: http://covide.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/covide/trunk/classes/voip/agi_scripts/mysql/faxreceive.php?revision=1view=markup What's more interesting for you I think is how you can convert this file into something more common. The code is here: http://covide.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/covide/trunk/classes/voip/data.php?revision=1view=markup line 80 and below. Basically you can run the following commandline tools on the file to create a .pdf sfftobmp -t origfaxfile -o sometifffile.tif tiff2pdf -o somepdffile.pdf sometifffile.tif Good luck -- Michiel van Baak [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://michiel.vanbaak.eu GnuPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0x71C946BD Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
Any hints on downgrading? I placed the old SIP 1.6.7 on the right folder, but my phone wont pick it up and install it. It must be thinking "this is an old version, ignore" or something I`ve never downgraded a phone, I tend to like upgrading more :-) Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick SmithSent: November 7, 2006 11:28 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] connect Sipura with Asterisk - both behind NAT
Try this site: http://forum.voxilla.com/asterisk-users-group/sipura-asterisk-setup-14252-3.html Juan Manuel On 11/7/06, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, both behind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather (especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good link explaining how to setup Linux server -- #Joseph ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Juan Manuel Sá (54.11) 15-4429-6560 (54.11) 4824-9048 (int 218) ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
Disregard my previous message, I succeeded in downgrading my phones. And it worked, thanks Rick for the info. Is there any Polycom-specific mailing list I should be on to be aware of stuff like that? Also, would you know how to check the version of sip.ld remotely? I know how to reboot remotely, and I did for a few phones, but my paranoid self would like to double check and see if the sip.ld 1.6.7 re-installed ok by checking the current version. Is that even possible? Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick SmithSent: November 7, 2006 11:28 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] loosening voicemail file permissions for msg????.txt and msg????.wav
HI folks, I figured out where in the source code to hack the .wav file permissions which were set too restrictive for me, but I cant figure out how to do the same for the .txt file. Looks like the voicemail.c file sets it nicely for asterisk1.4beta3 using a #define statement early on, but msg.txt comes out with permissions 0600 and there are no umask entries that affect how asterisk is started (if anything it would be 022). Ive grepped through the entire source tree from the expanded tarball, and changed every place where it says 0600 to 0666 and recompiled, but still no luck. Ive grepped for umask entries like 077 that might cause the problem, but again no luck. My work-around right now is a cron-job that chmods these directories every minute, but this is ridiculous. Anyone solved this? Thanks, Scott ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] hicecaller ID
Hi all ! I have a question regarding flexible callerid setting using the misdn I want to acheive the following: when starting a call with 0 I want to display CALLERID (which is setup right now) but when I start the call with 9 I want the callerid to be surpressed. How can this be done? nik ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] How is ANI Usually sent on an ISDN PRI?
I am getting ANI over an ISDN PRI T1 and they are sending *ANI*DNIS* as the EXTEN I am under the impression this is an old way of doing it on inband circuits such as EM wink but not used on a PRI. Previously I had a T1 PRI from a different carrier and there was a special field for ANI that could be viewed while watching a pri debug span on the CLI. I am trying to explain that this is the preferred method but am at a loss to show them examples or speak the right terminology. Can someone post some debug output with the ANI information or let me know the the actual terms. I know I am right but I am at a loss in trying to explain this to them. Thanks, Steve ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Re: Port Range
Also, change the port range to 1-10xxx in /etc/asterisk/rtp.conf and match it up in your port forward on your firewall instead of 1-2 which is far more anyone is likely to need. -Original Message- From: Eric ManxPower Wieling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:31 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Port Range Webmin uses UDP? Audio is generally RTP over UDP. Tom Vile wrote: That probably because you are using Webmin. Just change the port Webmin listens on instead, I use 9000. On 11/6/06, Zeeshan Zakaria [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll keep that in mind for future. I read about using 10001 as start port on Nerd Vittles website. Is there some good material online to read more about RTP, SIP, RTCP and UTP? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
I think in the features you can completely wipe the sip image Menus Settings Advanced Admin Settings Reset to default Then format the file system Bill From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:49 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset Any hints on downgrading? I placed the old SIP 1.6.7 on the right folder, but my phone wont pick it up and install it. It must be thinking this is an old version, ignore or something I`ve never downgraded a phone, I tend to like upgrading more :-) Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: November 7, 2006 11:28 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI, not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue
Hi All, I have a lab setup with two asterisk servers and a MAX TNT in the middle like this: asterisk sip sip TNT pri pri asterisk The TNT is running 11.0.6 and the asterisk servers are running 1.2.9.1. I can get calls to pass from asterisk sip to tnt to pri to asterisk but not the other way. The call from asterisk to pri to tnt is good, the TNT is passing SIP invite to the SIP Asterisk server. I have tried many variations of using sip options insecure, autocreatepeer, permit/deny, host, user, etc but can't seem to get asterisk to accept an unauthenticated call from the TNT using SIP. I keep getting SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. I know others have done this, but with older Asterisk versions, I'm wondering what versions of Asterisk are known to work with the MAX TNT and with what version of the TNT? I'm confident this is an asterisk issue, with insecure=very, I should be able to pass calls to asterisk without trying to authenticate it first. But this is not happening. Here is a debug of a call and a snip from my sip.conf: sip.conf [maxtnt] type=friend host=10.10.14.131 insecure=very dtmfmode=inband callerid=MaxTNT maxtnt context=trunktntin qualify=yes reinvite=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw debug lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a Remote-Party-Id: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;screen=no;id-type=subscriber;party=calling;privacy=off i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 m: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone k: replaces c: application/sdp Accept: application/sdp Accept-Encoding: Accept-Language: en User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 232 v=0 o=t1gw01 531756636 531756636 IN IP4 10.10.14.131 s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 10.10.14.131 t=0 0 m=audio 40198 RTP/AVP 0 96 a=silenceSupp:on a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --- (16 headers 11 lines) --- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.10.14.131 : 5060 (non-NAT) Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.10.14.131:5060: SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d;received=10.10.14.131 From: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Proxy-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm=asterisk, nonce=3ea7e98a Content-Length: 0 --- Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms Found user '1239' lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 ACK v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 0 Any guidance will be much appreciated. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
re: [asterisk-users] connect Sipura with Asterisk - both behind NAT
If your Asterisk is behind a NAT you can use externip=x.x.x.x (sip.conf) If your Sipura is behind a NAT you can use nat= yes (sip.conf) Btu I'm really afraid that unless you use a SIP proxy (e.g. Portaone) you won't be able to succesfully connect both elements if they both are behind NATs. It is just because of how SIP and NAT work together. Alyed Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 07 09:16:25 2006Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net [69.16.138.164] by maila11.webcontrolcenter.com with SMTP; Tue, 7 Nov 2006 09:16:25 -0700Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) Does anybody have a good link how to connect Sipura with Asteriks, bothbehind NAT? I'm using FWD but their connection is like a weather(especially IAX), I need something more reliable. I was thinking of using stun and/or proxy but can not find any good linkexplaining how to setup Linux server-- #Joseph___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Pressing * makes Asterisk destroy my call
I got an up2date Asterisk with SNOM360 as SIP and mISDN with 2 ISDN Cards, if i press in a call the * Asterisk, Asterisk destroys the call not, Asterisk lets him hang and do nothing, if i hangup, Asterisk tell me in the warnings-log that the bridging was not successfull ?! If have disabled the function to hangup in the features.conf, but the key is still available, can someone explain me whats going on there ? Stefan ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Queues and multiple lines
The default queue configuration would achieve this. Based on your queue calling method (ringall, roundrobin, etc), all the agents would be able to receive the 2nd call, and whoever answers it first gets it. Wes Baehr -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Sampson Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 1:39 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Queues and multiple lines Say I have agents using a softphone like eyebeam that has 6 lines. They log in to the queue. Say there are 3 agents in my queue. 3 calls come in and all three agents are on a call. Now a fourth call comes in. Is it possible to have it setup so that the 4 call rings on line 2 of one of my agents, if they don't get it within the time limit it rings on line 2 of another agent and so on. An agent can then put their current call on hold and go to the new call, say something like thanks for calling please hold, then go back to their first call, finish it up and then go back to the second call. I hope that made sense. I'm sure there is a way to get it done, but how flexible is the current queue system in Asterisk with stuff like this? -- Michael Sampson Information Systems Manager Customer Contact Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 952-936-4000 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] My Phone Review- Large Scale Corp Deployment.
Steve, I am running EXACTLY the same software as you. SMP kernel and all. Are you using the IDENTICAL non-SMP kernel verision# ? No crashes at all here for the 2 weeks it has been up but we don't use meetme. -Original Message- From: RR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 11:45 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] My Phone Review- Large Scale Corp Deployment. On 11/2/06, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running CentOS 4.4, Asterisk 1.2.13 on HP DL380's. My application is mostly meetme conferences being created and closed all day long. Peak load is around 200 SIP calls. I was crashing 7 to 10 times a day until I booted a non-SMP kernel. I haven't had a crash since. Meetme does not play well with SMP. HI Steve, I have constantly got conflicting reports about meetme and can't really make up my mind to actually put meetme into service till I find something better or just stick with meetme and be happy? I like the features it has but performance wise I have heard all sorts of things, yours being the most positive so far. so just wondering if I can learn something from you. So, is there anything special you've done in terms of configs, modules, OS tweaking/tuning and the like, in other words, anything over and above simply installing OS and (*) with meetme for the system mentioned above? Have you standardised codecs across the board to minimise translation overhead? If so, then what codec are you using? Are all your users on IP or some can come through the PSTN via DIDs etc? Thanks Ranj ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk
Running several Aastra 9133i and 480CT phones with v1.4 firmware CentOS 4.4, Asterisk 1.2.13, Zaptel 1.2.10, Freepbx2.1.3. Using all default settings I have not seen that problem. I am not exactly sure we are creating those exact same conditions but it sounds like standard extension use to multiple incoming calls correct? That is all we are doing plus some more complicated outgoing stuff. -Original Message- From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 5:31 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk *bump* Anyone? On 11/6/06, Curt Shaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wanted to add what we have both seen on traffic captures. You see Caller 1's RTP stream. Call 2 comes in and you see the creation of its RTP stream. After Call 2 is put on hold the RTP stream from Caller 1 disappears without a trace never to return and this is when the one way audio is happening. And I also wanted to add that I am running 1.4.0 firmware for this phone. Thanks again! -Original Message- From: Curt Shaffer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:58 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk I'm the friend mentioned here. I am using the Aastra 480i CT. It is SIP to my PBX and IAX termination from the PBX to my provider. My issue has a slight twist to it but the same result. For instance his is always where as mine is frequent but not always. After I got to finally see it first hand today, I had to start over from Caller 1 5 times to get it to happen again. Caller 1 calls in and Person A answers. Caller 2 calls in and Person B answers. Person B puts caller 2 on hold and audio drops on Caller 1. So Person A can hear caller 1 but caller 1 cannot hear Person A. This happens more often when Call 1 is on the handset and Call 2 is on the portable or vis a vi, but this is not always the case. It does happen to 1 set only but just less frequent. I have tried carrierinvite=yes and no but this does not change the issue. The phones are behind a router but the external IP of the router is on the same network as the * box. Thanks! Curt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 6:35 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: [asterisk-users] Question on Aastra phones and Astrisk Hi, Some odd behaviour here. A friend and I were talking tonight, and it seems we have both seen the same problem. We are both using aastra phones (I am using 9113is).We have a connection to and from providers via SIP and IAX.When I place a call on the local hold of the phone, and then pick them back up I can hear them, but they can not hear me.However, if I park the call, and then pick it up again, the audio is fine. Tonight I tried placing a call on hold using a Sipura/Linksys ATA (that is just hitting 'flash', which basically puts the call on local hold and starts music).The problem did not manifest itself. Has anyone else had this issue? Do you have a fix for it? It is an astrisk issue or an aastra issue? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] How do I make this stop? (Bridging of IAX channels?)
Asterisk is still going to try to native bridge the two channels. Once this occurs chan_iax2 is going to notice that you don't want a native transfer to happen and not do it. Ok should it be giving me any indication that it has NOT done a native transfer? Or does it just say 'attempting native bridge', indicating it is trying and then silently fails? ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] incoming call destination: IVR not working
Hi, I am a newbie putting together my first Asterisk system and having a problem with the IVR handling incoming calls. I installed the Asterisk Trixbox version 1.2.2 with a X100P FXO PCI card. I have a PSTN line connected to the card. I set up two extensions: 200 and 201. I created a test IVR that says, for sales, press 1, for support, press 2. If you press 1 it should go to extension 200, if you press 2, it should go to extension 201. I setup two software SIP phones: SJ and Xlite (one for one extension and one for the other). If I dial from the softphones, everything works as expected. I can also dial out and between the phones. The problem is that if someone dials in, the IVR does not respond to what they press (1 or 2) and after repeating the greeting three times, hangs up. If I change the incoming destination to go directly to one of the extensions instead of the IVR, it works fine. I am guessing it has something to do with the IVR recognizing the DTMF but not sure what to do from here. TIA for any help or suggestions. -mark ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] My Phone Review- Large Scale Corp Deployment.
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, RR wrote: On 11/2/06, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm running CentOS 4.4, Asterisk 1.2.13 on HP DL380's. My application is mostly meetme conferences being created and closed all day long. Peak load is around 200 SIP calls. I was crashing 7 to 10 times a day until I booted a non-SMP kernel. I haven't had a crash since. Meetme does not play well with SMP. HI Steve, I have constantly got conflicting reports about meetme and can't really make up my mind to actually put meetme into service till I find something better or just stick with meetme and be happy? I like the features it has but performance wise I have heard all sorts of things, yours being the most positive so far. so just wondering if I can learn something from you. So, is there anything special you've done in terms of configs, modules, OS tweaking/tuning and the like, in other words, anything over and above simply installing OS and (*) with meetme for the system mentioned above? Have you standardised codecs across the board to minimise translation overhead? If so, then what codec are you using? Are all your users on IP or some can come through the PSTN via DIDs etc? All calls come in from a Tekelec 7000 via SIP. Out of a peak of 200 calls, probably around 100 are in meetme, others are listening to recorded messages or bouncing around in the menus. No OS tweaks, no Asterisk source tweaks. A TE410p is used as a timing source. The sound quality was not acceptable with ztdummy. I stripped down /etc/asterisk/modules.conf just 'cause parts left out don't get broken :) My sip.conf only allows ulaw, but show channel shows some using ulaw and some using slin. This may be changing as the calls bounce from meetme to recorded wav messages. The Zap pseudo channels show ulaw -- I would have expected slin. Somebody who understands codec switching could help out and explain it to both of us :) top refreshing every 3 seconds shows the asterisk process consuming from 10% to 70% of the CPU. top refreshing every 30 seconds shows around 30%. Does anybody know what causes the spikes. Thanks in advance, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: +1-760-468-3867 PST Newline Fax: +1-760-731-3000 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] astertest
Hi all!! I've made some changes to the applications that Astertest was using to monitor the performance of the server. Now is also possible to track the bandwidth usage of the server, this has nothing to do with the executable (astertest.exe) itself but with the events that the Asterisk Manager generates. The method described in: http://www.asteriskguru.com/tutorials/astertest.html to perform the test is still valid. In the next days I am gonna make available some scripts to originate the calls and to make some graphs of the test, just like astertest does ;) You can find the sources here: http://toofic.no-ip.org/pub/src/app_securax.tar.gz I've compiled them against Asterisk 1.2.12.1, but I think there should not be problems with other versions. I hope someone could find it useful. -- Grettings, Víctor Toofic ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI, not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue
Update, I loaded asterisk 1.0.10 and it worked straight away. I can send unauthenticated calls to asterisk. Something in 1.2.9.1 and 1.2.13 are not allowing unauthenticated calls when insecure=very is set in sip.conf, either in the global or peer context. Are there any switches in the Asterisk Makefile to allow this? JR On 11/7/06, JR Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have a lab setup with two asterisk servers and a MAX TNT in the middle like this: asterisk sip sip TNT pri pri asterisk The TNT is running 11.0.6 and the asterisk servers are running 1.2.9.1. I can get calls to pass from asterisk sip to tnt to pri to asterisk but not the other way. The call from asterisk to pri to tnt is good, the TNT is passing SIP invite to the SIP Asterisk server. I have tried many variations of using sip options insecure, autocreatepeer, permit/deny, host, user, etc but can't seem to get asterisk to accept an unauthenticated call from the TNT using SIP. I keep getting SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. I know others have done this, but with older Asterisk versions, I'm wondering what versions of Asterisk are known to work with the MAX TNT and with what version of the TNT? I'm confident this is an asterisk issue, with insecure=very, I should be able to pass calls to asterisk without trying to authenticate it first. But this is not happening. Here is a debug of a call and a snip from my sip.conf: sip.conf [maxtnt] type=friend host=10.10.14.131 insecure=very dtmfmode=inband callerid=MaxTNT maxtnt context=trunktntin qualify=yes reinvite=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw debug lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a Remote-Party-Id: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;screen=no;id-type=subscriber;party=calling;privacy=off i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 m: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone k: replaces c: application/sdp Accept: application/sdp Accept-Encoding: Accept-Language: en User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 232 v=0 o=t1gw01 531756636 531756636 IN IP4 10.10.14.131 s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 10.10.14.131 t=0 0 m=audio 40198 RTP/AVP 0 96 a=silenceSupp:on a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --- (16 headers 11 lines) --- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.10.14.131 : 5060 (non-NAT) Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.10.14.131:5060: SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d;received=10.10.14.131 From: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Proxy-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm=asterisk, nonce=3ea7e98a Content-Length: 0 --- Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms Found user '1239' lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 ACK v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 0 Any guidance will be much appreciated. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Microsoft will enter VoIP market in earnest next year, says Ballmer
http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/international/asia/15944981.htm Theres not much in the article so only click through if super interested but Im curious and looking for peoples opinions. What application integration would you like to see between MS (either Office or other aspects of the vista/xp OS) and Asterisk. Apart from dial from outlook and number pop Im kind of curious what other functionality there is to be developed (Id also like to see drop and drag from outlook into conference calls. What would you like to see in asterisk, if we get some solid responses well see about organizing some bounties to get it developed. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +1-917-207-3420 Mb +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] test message please ignore
___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] [resolved] asterisk 1,4 and google talk
hi, it turns out that the iksemel library (which i installed using an rpm) was returning 0 when the function iks_has_tls() was called. it should return 1 otherwise res_jabber.o thinks gnuTLS is not installed. i confirmed this by running a test program i wrote, that calls iks_has_tls . it returned 0. i downloaded iksemel source, compiled it and now the test program returned 1. now, jabber show connected shows the google talk account as connected, but i don't see this buddy online on my other google talk buddy list. i added an extension in extensions.conf that calls Gtalk/buddy, and as soon as i call this extension, asterisk terminates due to a segmentation fault. it didn't seem like a core was dumped - i'm still looking for it. thanks sridhar _ Live the life in style with MSN Lifestyle. Check out! http://content.msn.co.in/Lifestyle/Default ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through
Hi, My messages to the list don't get through. This must be the tenth message i am trying to send! Please ignore this test message. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Fax Digium
I was planning on using a TDM400P with 3 FXO 1 FXS, with the 1 FXS being used for a fax machine. It now appears that Digium doesn't support this, are there other manufacturers anyone can recommend that will support it? Has anyone used a TDM400P in this setup and had it work without much issue? Thanks for the help, Ken ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Glitches in sound every time that Asterisk receives reINVITEs
Hi all, My Asterisk server is working fine, although every time that in the middle of any call there is a reinvite, the user hears a glitch. Why is this happening? How can I solve this problem? Thanks in advance, Ricardo Carvalho. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Queues and multiple lines
Using SIP: Just create another user account say the softphones user's name is bob: create [bob] (bob's main line on his softphone) create [bob1] (same configuration options, then you can do all your other configurations for this user ) hope this helps anyone is open to correcting me :] my 2 cents `KruZ~ From: Michael Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject: [asterisk-users] Queues and multiple lines Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:39:25 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: from lists.digium.com ([69.16.138.164]) by bay0-mc10-f2.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2444); Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:19:53 -0800 Received: from digium-69-16-138-164.phx1.puregig.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB2F7FC803;Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:40:05 -0700 (MST) Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx47.postini.com [64.18.3.147])by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FE2E7FC6FAfor asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Tue, 7 Nov 2006 11:39:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from source ([207.195.195.18]) (using TLSv1) byexprod8mx47.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Nov 2006 10:39:30 PST Received: from [192.168.1.35] ([71.39.108.129])by unix18.sihope.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id kA7IdQSc050775for asterisk-users@lists.digium.com;Tue, 7 Nov 2006 12:39:26 -0600 (CST)(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) X-Message-Info: txF49lGdW41fv5JCf0u+LC0BEkvsM92gePhvdubElwo= X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909) X-pstn-levels: (S:49.30289/99.9 FC:95.5390 LC:95.5390 R:95.9108 P:95.9108M:97.0282 C:98.6951 ) X-pstn-settings: 3 (1.:1.) s fc lc gt3 gt2 gt1 r p m c X-pstn-addresses: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] [db-null] X-BeenThere: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussionasterisk-users.lists.digium.com List-Unsubscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Archive: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users List-Post: mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com List-Help: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] List-Subscribe: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users,mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2006 19:20:03.0766 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA0B9560:01C702A1] Say I have agents using a softphone like eyebeam that has 6 lines. They log in to the queue. Say there are 3 agents in my queue. 3 calls come in and all three agents are on a call. Now a fourth call comes in. Is it possible to have it setup so that the 4 call rings on line 2 of one of my agents, if they don't get it within the time limit it rings on line 2 of another agent and so on. An agent can then put their current call on hold and go to the new call, say something like thanks for calling please hold, then go back to their first call, finish it up and then go back to the second call. I hope that made sense. I'm sure there is a way to get it done, but how flexible is the current queue system in Asterisk with stuff like this? -- Michael Sampson Information Systems Manager Customer Contact Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 952-936-4000 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users _ Get FREE company branded e-mail accounts and business Web site from Microsoft Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/mcrssaub0050001411mrt/direct/01/ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] RE: Queues and multiple lines
I think you could enable call waiting (*70) on those stations and they would have the second line ring in. This is what I have done in the past. The second call would continue to use the ring strategy configured in the queue. You can also enable call waiting from the Asterisk command line by typing: database put CW XXX ENABLED (where XXX is the extension) Not sure if this is what you're looking for, but hope it helps. Regards, Shane -- Message: 9 Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 12:39:25 -0600 From: Michael Sampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [asterisk-users] Queues and multiple lines To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Say I have agents using a softphone like eyebeam that has 6 lines. They log in to the queue. Say there are 3 agents in my queue. 3 calls come in and all three agents are on a call. Now a fourth call comes in. Is it possible to have it setup so that the 4 call rings on line 2 of one of my agents, if they don't get it within the time limit it rings on line 2 of another agent and so on. An agent can then put their current call on hold and go to the new call, say something like thanks for calling please hold, then go back to their first call, finish it up and then go back to the second call. I hope that made sense. I'm sure there is a way to get it done, but how flexible is the current queue system in Asterisk with stuff like this? -- Michael Sampson Information Systems Manager Customer Contact Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] 952-936-4000 ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] Help with latest Asterisk on latest Debian
Hi all, First, I really hope that this message gets through since i had to change email address on this list. Only one message from me with my previous address got through. I am running latest test version of Debian and I have done the following: First, i did apt-get build-dep asterisk Then I downloaded the latest version of Zaptel, Libpri and Asterisk, something with 1.4. I am using Kernel 2.6.17.686-2 so I did apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686 However, I get the following error message when trying to compile Zaptel. The scripts folder seem to be missing in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686 It is there, but to me it looks like a file not a folder. make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-2-686/build SUBDIRS=/root/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686' Makefile:266: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686/scripts/Kbuild.include: No such file or directory /bin/sh: line 0: [: -lt: unary operator expected make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686/scripts/Kbuild.include'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686' make: *** [linux26] Error 2 I am a little new to this as well. All the best and many thanks for all your help, Christian ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[asterisk-users] test please ignore
___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
hmm, Id like to know that. How do you reboot remotely ? J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:13 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset Disregard my previous message, I succeeded in downgrading my phones. And it worked, thanks Rick for the info. Is there any Polycom-specific mailing list I should be on to be aware of stuff like that? Also, would you know how to check the version of sip.ld remotely? I know how to reboot remotely, and I did for a few phones, but my paranoid self would like to double check and see if the sip.ld 1.6.7 re-installed ok by checking the current version. Is that even possible? Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Smith Sent: November 7, 2006 11:28 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI, not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue
what is the sip.conf for 1239 which I'm going to assume is a extension on the TNT Barry JR Richardson wrote: Hi All, I have a lab setup with two asterisk servers and a MAX TNT in the middle like this: asterisk sip sip TNT pri pri asterisk The TNT is running 11.0.6 and the asterisk servers are running 1.2.9.1. I can get calls to pass from asterisk sip to tnt to pri to asterisk but not the other way. The call from asterisk to pri to tnt is good, the TNT is passing SIP invite to the SIP Asterisk server. I have tried many variations of using sip options insecure, autocreatepeer, permit/deny, host, user, etc but can't seem to get asterisk to accept an unauthenticated call from the TNT using SIP. I keep getting SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. I know others have done this, but with older Asterisk versions, I'm wondering what versions of Asterisk are known to work with the MAX TNT and with what version of the TNT? I'm confident this is an asterisk issue, with insecure=very, I should be able to pass calls to asterisk without trying to authenticate it first. But this is not happening. Here is a debug of a call and a snip from my sip.conf: sip.conf [maxtnt] type=friend host=10.10.14.131 insecure=very dtmfmode=inband callerid=MaxTNT maxtnt context=trunktntin qualify=yes reinvite=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw debug lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a Remote-Party-Id: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;screen=no;id-type=subscriber;party=calling;privacy=off i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 m: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone k: replaces c: application/sdp Accept: application/sdp Accept-Encoding: Accept-Language: en User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 232 v=0 o=t1gw01 531756636 531756636 IN IP4 10.10.14.131 s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 10.10.14.131 t=0 0 m=audio 40198 RTP/AVP 0 96 a=silenceSupp:on a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --- (16 headers 11 lines) --- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.10.14.131 : 5060 (non-NAT) Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.10.14.131:5060: SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d;received=10.10.14.131 From: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Proxy-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm=asterisk, nonce=3ea7e98a Content-Length: 0 --- Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms Found user '1239' lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 ACK v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 0 Any guidance will be much appreciated. Thanks. JR ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI, not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue
Title: Re: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI,not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue When all else fails I resort to adding this in the sip.conf peer config: Insecure=invite,port It took me a while to figure out they can be used together. Regards, Scott - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tue Nov 07 15:23:26 2006 Subject: [asterisk-users] Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI,not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue Hi All, I have a lab setup with two asterisk servers and a MAX TNT in the middle like this: asterisk sip sip TNT pri pri asterisk The TNT is running 11.0.6 and the asterisk servers are running 1.2.9.1. I can get calls to pass from asterisk sip to tnt to pri to asterisk but not the other way. The call from asterisk to pri to tnt is good, the TNT is passing SIP invite to the SIP Asterisk server. I have tried many variations of using sip options insecure, autocreatepeer, permit/deny, host, user, etc but can't seem to get asterisk to accept an unauthenticated call from the TNT using SIP. I keep getting SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. I know others have done this, but with older Asterisk versions, I'm wondering what versions of Asterisk are known to work with the MAX TNT and with what version of the TNT? I'm confident this is an asterisk issue, with insecure=very, I should be able to pass calls to asterisk without trying to authenticate it first. But this is not happening. Here is a debug of a call and a snip from my sip.conf: sip.conf [maxtnt] type=friend host=10.10.14.131 insecure=very dtmfmode=inband callerid=MaxTNT maxtnt context=trunktntin qualify=yes reinvite=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw debug lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a Remote-Party-Id: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;screen=no;id-type=subscriber;party=calling;privacy=off i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 m: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone k: replaces c: application/sdp Accept: application/sdp Accept-Encoding: Accept-Language: en User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 232 v=0 o=t1gw01 531756636 531756636 IN IP4 10.10.14.131 s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 10.10.14.131 t=0 0 m=audio 40198 RTP/AVP 0 96 a=silenceSupp:on a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --- (16 headers 11 lines) --- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.10.14.131 : 5060 (non-NAT) Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.10.14.131:5060: SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d;received=10.10.14.131 From: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Proxy-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm=asterisk, nonce=3ea7e98a Content-Length: 0 --- Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms Found user '1239' lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 ACK v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 0 Any guidance will be much appreciated. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
In Asterisk enter 'sip show peer name' and you can see this in the Useragent field. Example (for 2.0.1): Useragent : PolycomSoundPointIP-SPIP_501-UA/2.0.1.0313 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:13To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset Disregard my previous message, I succeeded in downgrading my phones. And it worked, thanks Rick for the info. Is there any Polycom-specific mailing list I should be on to be aware of stuff like that? Also, would you know how to check the version of sip.ld remotely? I know how to reboot remotely, and I did for a few phones, but my paranoid self would like to double check and see if the sip.ld 1.6.7 re-installed ok by checking the current version. Is that even possible? Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick SmithSent: November 7, 2006 11:28 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Dial plan Question
Answering my own question. If you want to connect an spa3K with generic pstn inbound do the following... for the pstn to voip dialplan in the pstn tab - (S0:ip-address-of-*) in sip.conf [sipurafxo] context=from-pstn etc. Then in * extensions.conf use the s extension. [from-pstn] exten = s,1,answer() exten = s,2,dial. etc. Makes it alot easier as you do not have to deal with extension matching when you know where it is coming from. Doug On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Doug Crompton wrote: Thanks, that set off a light bulb In my spa3K my incoming dialplan was set to (S0:405) Since this is a one FXO unit and my [from-pstn] will always be that line can I make it generic and use the 's' extension as I described? If so what would that spa3k dialplan be? just s0 ? Doug On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Anselm Martin Hoffmeister wrote: Am Dienstag, den 07.11.2006, 02:29 -0500 schrieb Doug Crompton: I am trying to do something that I see describe in a book and it is not working In my sip.conf, I have in my [fxo] context=from-pstn I then have in extensions.conf [from-pstn] exten s,1,answer() exten s,2,playback(blah) etc. It never answers but if I do this [from-pstn] exten _x.,1,answer() exten _x.,2,playback(blah) it works. Why does the 's' extension not work here? If fxo means your SIP provider, and you register with him, a specific extension will be called. Which one shall be called can be selected by the last parameter of the register statement, e.g. register = 075741:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060/492281234567 will cause the incoming calls to appear in extension 492281234567. Comes in handy if you have several accounts with a single SIP provider: This way, you can simply distinguish the outward phone number for which the call came in. BR Anselm ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954* * 215-431-6307 * ** * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users Those that sacrifice essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Ben Franklin (1759) * Doug Crompton * * Richboro, PA 18954 * * 215-431-6307* * * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]* * http://www.crompton.com * ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Digium
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 13:15, Ken Williams wrote: I was planning on using a TDM400P with 3 FXO 1 FXS, with the 1 FXS being used for a fax machine. It now appears that Digium doesn't support this, are there other manufacturers anyone can recommend that will support it? Has anyone used a TDM400P in this setup and had it work without much issue? Yes, I have implemented this on a few occasions and it has worked fine for me. hads -- http://nicegear.co.nz New Zealand's VoIP supplier ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through
They do get through. Messages you send to the list won't get sent back to you, because you sent them. On 11/7/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,My messages to the list don't get through. This must be the tenth message i am trying to send! Please ignore this test message.___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Alex Robar[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft will enter VoIP market in earnest next year, says Ballmer
Unified messaging would be nice. Not just having my VM's e-mailed to me, but to be able to manage them from with Outlook (or any other mail client for that matter) would be nice. I picture it sort of like an IMAP mailbox, and the mail client just has some kind of functionality to recognize that the message is a VM and not a mail message (so it could display length, date/time received, CID, and provide a play button). Just my two cents.AlexOn 11/7/06, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/international/asia/15944981.htm There's not much in the article so only click through if super interested but I'm curious and looking for people's opinions. What application integration would you like to see between MS (either Office or other aspects of the vista/xp OS) and Asterisk. Apart from dial from outlook and number pop I'm kind of curious what other functionality there is to be developed (I'd also like to see drop and drag from outlook into conference calls. What would you like to see in asterisk, if we get some solid responses we'll see about organizing some bounties to get it developed. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +1-917-207-3420 Mb +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Alex Robar[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through
On 11/7/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My messages to the list don't get through. This must be the tenth message i am trying to send! Please ignore this test message. On Wed November 8 2006 13:08, Alex Robar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They do get through. Messages you send to the list won't get sent back to you, because you sent them. Hi Alex. Are you sure about that? I receive a copy of every email I send to the list. -- Nick E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588 F: +61 7 5591 6588 If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make any use of the email. We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality or copyright associated with it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through
I _was_ sure until mention it just now... I certainly don't get a copy of any messages I sent to the list, whether I send from my personal or office accounts. Maybe the way my mail clients are handling it? If so, my apologies to Christian. AlexOn 11/7/06, Nick Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/7/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, My messages to the list don't get through. This must be the tenth message i am trying to send! Please ignore this test message.On Wed November 8 2006 13:08, Alex Robar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They do get through. Messages you send to the list won't get sent back to you, because you sent them.Hi Alex. Are you sure about that? I receive a copy of every email I send tothe list.-- NickE: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588F: +61 7 5591 6588If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make anyuse of the email.We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality orcopyright associated with it. -- Alex Robar[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Help with latest Asterisk on latest Debian
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 02:24:23AM +0100, Christian wrote: Hi all, I am running latest test version of Debian and I have done the following: First, i did apt-get build-dep asterisk Then I downloaded the latest version of Zaptel, Libpri and Asterisk, something with 1.4. I am using Kernel 2.6.17.686-2 so I did from package, or self-built? apt-get install linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686 Was it properly installed, with all dependencies? However, I get the following error message when trying to compile Zaptel. The scripts folder seem to be missing in /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686 It is there, but to me it looks like a file not a folder. make -C /lib/modules/2.6.17-2-686/build SUBDIRS=/root/zaptel-1.4.0-beta2 modules make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686' Makefile:266: /usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686/scripts/Kbuild.include: No such file or directory /bin/sh: line 0: [: -lt: unary operator expected make[1]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686/scripts/Kbuild.include'. Stop. make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/linux-headers-2.6.17-2-686' make: *** [linux26] Error 2 I am a little new to this as well. All the best and many thanks for all your help, Christian One other thing to try: apt-get install zaptel-source m-a -t -i build zaptel This would be zaptel 1.2, but similar enough. -- Tzafrir Cohen icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +972-50-7952406 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.xorcom.com iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Digium
- Original Message - From: Hadley Rich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:07 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Fax Digium On Wednesday 08 November 2006 13:15, Ken Williams wrote: I was planning on using a TDM400P with 3 FXO 1 FXS, with the 1 FXS being used for a fax machine. It now appears that Digium doesn't support this, are there other manufacturers anyone can recommend that will support it? Has anyone used a TDM400P in this setup and had it work without much issue? Yes, I have implemented this on a few occasions and it has worked fine for me. hads -- http://nicegear.co.nz New Zealand's VoIP supplier ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- I tried this and no I have a big percentage of faxes that do not go thru. Do you mind sharing how you set it up ? Thanks. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Microsoft will enter VoIP market in earnest nextyear, says Ballmer
Take a look at OVA. mms://wm.microsoft.com/ms/exchange/2007/Phone_Based_User_Experience_With_Outlook_Voice_Access_300k.wmv From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alex Robar Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 9:13 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Microsoft will enter VoIP market in earnest nextyear, says Ballmer Unified messaging would be nice. Not just having my VM's e-mailed to me, but to be able to manage them from with Outlook (or any other mail client for that matter) would be nice. I picture it sort of like an IMAP mailbox, and the mail client just has some kind of functionality to recognize that the message is a VM and not a mail message (so it could display length, date/time received, CID, and provide a play button). Just my two cents. Alex On 11/7/06, Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.siliconvalley.com/mld/siliconvalley/business/international/asia/15944981.htm There's not much in the article so only click through if super interested but I'm curious and looking for people's opinions. What application integration would you like to see between MS (either Office or other aspects of the vista/xp OS) and Asterisk. Apart from dial from outlook and number pop I'm kind of curious what other functionality there is to be developed (I'd also like to see drop and drag from outlook into conference calls. What would you like to see in asterisk, if we get some solid responses we'll see about organizing some bounties to get it developed. Regards, Dean Collins Cognation Pty Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1-212-203-4357 Ph +1-917-207-3420 Mb +61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial). ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users -- Alex Robar [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen
- Original Message - From: Nick Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: asterisk-users Mailing List asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 10:53 AM Subject: [asterisk-users] Snom 360 flickering screen Hi guys. I just bought and configured a Snom 360 and have noticed that the LCD is constantly flickering at a rate of ~10-15Hz (that's a guess). Either way, it's very distracting. Has anyone else encountered this before? Any solutions? Cheers, -- Nick E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588 F: +61 7 5591 6588 If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make any use of the email. We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality or copyright associated with it. On Wed November 8 2006 01:30, Dovid B [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had a problem with snom where the screen went completly blank. Snom told me there was an issue where that the cable going from the phone board to the screen would fall out. I opend the phone and sliped it back in. Hi Dovid, thanks for the recommendation. I opened up my 360 and looked around. Everything was connected properly, but I noticed that some of the wires connecting the two PCBs were partially crushed by one of the case's support posts. When closing the case, I made sure to move the wires out of the way of the posts. The screen's much better now. If I look at it from an extreme angle I can see a lot of flickering, but at normal angles there's almost no flickering. Thanks again! -- Nick E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: +61 7 5591 3588 F: +61 7 5591 6588 If you receive this email by mistake, please notify us and do not make any use of the email. We do not waive any privilege, confidentiality or copyright associated with it. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through
I have seen this mainly with gmail. the logic is why do you need your own postings. Fish around to see if there is a setting in Gmail where it will keep the email. I know for myself I want the email's that I sent. It lets me know that they went out as well as it helps for sorting the emails. - Original Message - From: Alex Robar To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 5:08 AM Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through They do get through. Messages you send to the list won't get sent back to you, because you sent them. On 11/7/06, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,My messages to the list don't get through. This must be the tenth message i am trying to send! Please ignore this test message.___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Alex Robar[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Why dont my messages get through
On 11/8/06, Nick Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They do get through. Messages you send to the list won't get sent back to you, because you sent them. Hi Alex. Are you sure about that? I receive a copy of every email I send to the list. I think it's just Gmail that hides them, especially since you have the one you sent already there. It does the same for another mailing list I'm on. This doesn't apply to Christian, of course. (Interesting experiment would be to delete your sent copy as soon as you send it, before the list server sends it back, and see if it reappears...) Andrew -- Linux supports the notion of a command line or a shell for the same reason that only children read books with only pictures in them. Language, be it English or something else, is the only tool flexible enough to accomplish a sufficiently broad range of tasks. -- Bill Garrett ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] hicecaller ID
To hide the caller ID, do this: exten = _9NXXNXX.,1,Set(CALLERID(all)=Unknown00) exten = _9NXXNXX.,2,Dial,SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] bp On 11/7/06, Nik Engel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all !I have a question regarding flexible callerid settingusing the misdnI want to acheive the following: when starting a call with 0 I want to display CALLERID (which is setupright now) but when I start the call with 9 I want the callerid to besurpressed.How can this be done?nik ___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --asterisk-users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] Re: Asterisk and Max TNT Passing calls SIP to PRI, not PRI to SIP Authentication Issue
AFAIK, in 1.2.x the insecure=very change in favor to insecure=port,invite, also you can try with allowguest=yes Regards JR Richardson wrote: Update, I loaded asterisk 1.0.10 and it worked straight away. I can send unauthenticated calls to asterisk. Something in 1.2.9.1 and 1.2.13 are not allowing unauthenticated calls when insecure=very is set in sip.conf, either in the global or peer context. Are there any switches in the Asterisk Makefile to allow this? JR On 11/7/06, JR Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, I have a lab setup with two asterisk servers and a MAX TNT in the middle like this: asterisk sip sip TNT pri pri asterisk The TNT is running 11.0.6 and the asterisk servers are running 1.2.9.1. I can get calls to pass from asterisk sip to tnt to pri to asterisk but not the other way. The call from asterisk to pri to tnt is good, the TNT is passing SIP invite to the SIP Asterisk server. I have tried many variations of using sip options insecure, autocreatepeer, permit/deny, host, user, etc but can't seem to get asterisk to accept an unauthenticated call from the TNT using SIP. I keep getting SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required. I know others have done this, but with older Asterisk versions, I'm wondering what versions of Asterisk are known to work with the MAX TNT and with what version of the TNT? I'm confident this is an asterisk issue, with insecure=very, I should be able to pass calls to asterisk without trying to authenticate it first. But this is not happening. Here is a debug of a call and a snip from my sip.conf: sip.conf [maxtnt] type=friend host=10.10.14.131 insecure=very dtmfmode=inband callerid=MaxTNT maxtnt context=trunktntin qualify=yes reinvite=no canreinvite=no disallow=all allow=ulaw debug lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a Remote-Party-Id: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;screen=no;id-type=subscriber;party=calling;privacy=off i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 m: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone k: replaces c: application/sdp Accept: application/sdp Accept-Encoding: Accept-Language: en User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 232 v=0 o=t1gw01 531756636 531756636 IN IP4 10.10.14.131 s=Session SDP c=IN IP4 10.10.14.131 t=0 0 m=audio 40198 RTP/AVP 0 96 a=silenceSupp:on a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:96 telephone-event/8000 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 --- (16 headers 11 lines) --- Using INVITE request as basis request - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sending to 10.10.14.131 : 5060 (non-NAT) Reliably Transmitting (no NAT) to 10.10.14.131:5060: SIP/2.0 407 Proxy Authentication Required Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d;received=10.10.14.131 From: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY Proxy-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm=asterisk, nonce=3ea7e98a Content-Length: 0 --- Scheduling destruction of call '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' in 15000 ms Found user '1239' lab1*CLI -- SIP read from 10.10.14.131:5060: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone SIP/2.0 t: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=as41f8454e f: NO CID NAME sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060;user=phone;tag=5fe9f589-1fb1f65c-830e0a0a i: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 639089 ACK v: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.14.131:5060;branch=z9hG4bK006187a112a9899d Max-Forwards: 70 User-Agent: Lucent-Universal-Gateway l: 0 Any guidance will be much appreciated. Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [asterisk-users] Sticky Polycom 501 keys and handset
This should be in your Asterisk sip_notify.conf file by default I believe (if not, add it with an appropriate name): [polycom-check-cfg]Event=check-syncContent-Length=0 Then in the Asterisk run this (assuming the phone is registered properly): sip notify polycom-check-cfg user If the configuration on your FTP server (assuming FTP/TFTP configuration) has changed, it will reboot. Otherwise, in your sip.cfg for your phones, look for this: voIpProt.SIP.specialEvent.checkSync.alwaysReboot="0" Change it to this to always reboot when receiving the notify: voIpProt.SIP.specialEvent.checkSync.alwaysReboot="1" From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick SmithSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 17:44To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset hmm, Id like to know that. How do you reboot remotely ? J From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 2:13 PMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset Disregard my previous message, I succeeded in downgrading my phones. And it worked, thanks Rick for the info. Is there any Polycom-specific mailing list I should be on to be aware of stuff like that? Also, would you know how to check the version of sip.ld remotely? I know how to reboot remotely, and I did for a few phones, but my paranoid self would like to double check and see if the sip.ld 1.6.7 re-installed ok by checking the current version. Is that even possible? Mike From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick SmithSent: November 7, 2006 11:28 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: RE: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset I had this EXACT same problem, and 2.0.x is the problem according to Polycom Tech Support. I had such a hard time explaining the problem, too Downgraded to 1.6.7 and all worked well again. Polycom says if youre using Asterisk, dont go past 1.6.7 until they say to. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeSent: Tuesday, November 07, 2006 11:02 AMTo: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'Subject: [asterisk-users] "Sticky" Polycom 501 keys and handset Hi, I've recently bought new Polycom 501 phones, upgraded to bootrom 3.2.2 and SIP 2.0.1. I just noticed something, which I first blamed on Asterisk and NATs (a 2 second silence at the beginning of a call). Something I'venoticed also on my old phone (which is having the same problem now, but its also been upgraded). My keys are sticky. Simple as that. Sometimes I press a number and the key comes up (the hardware seems fine) but the phone produces this lng tone as if I had pressed the key for 3 seconds. Even the receiver is sticky, giving my dialtone when I lift it only1-2 seconds after I lift the handset. It simply looks like the phone can't keep up, like a sluggishcomputer. Anybody has ever seem this? I'd like to downgrde to SIP 1.6.7 to see if the new sip app was the problem. How can I do that? I've placed the old sip.ld file where I had to, but the phone wont pick it up. Short of that, can somebody point me to the newest firmware (2.0.2) to see if thatwould help? Mike ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [asterisk-users] My Phone Review- Large Scale Corp Deployment.
On 11/8/06, Steve Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All calls come in from a Tekelec 7000 via SIP. Out of a peak of 200 calls, probably around 100 are in meetme, others are listening to recorded messages or bouncing around in the menus. Sounds exactly like what people in my system would be doing. No OS tweaks, no Asterisk source tweaks. A TE410p is used as a timing source. The sound quality was not acceptable with ztdummy. Aha, so that's something I don't have and most prob. can't have (no empty PCI slots left on the 1U servers). Hmmm maybe that might make the difference between how many conferences my boxes will handle before it starts to sound bad! I stripped down /etc/asterisk/modules.conf just 'cause parts left out don't get broken :) Agreed, I have even removed non-used conf files so the size of (*) in memory is significantly smaller. My sip.conf only allows ulaw, but show channel shows some using ulaw and some using slin. This may be changing as the calls bounce from meetme to recorded wav messages. The Zap pseudo channels show ulaw -- I would have expected slin. Somebody who understands codec switching could help out and explain it to both of us :) Think you would only see slin if some system playback needs to access non-ulaw encoded files or users come on a different codec than others. Since the latter isn't happening, there's no need for your system to convert anything to slin, which is why your systems shows the Zap pseudo channels as ulaw and playback of recorded messages doesn't use the Zap pseudo channels. So unless my understanding is wrong, what your systems shows is consistent with your description of the settings you have there :) top refreshing every 3 seconds shows the asterisk process consuming from 10% to 70% of the CPU. top refreshing every 30 seconds shows around 30%. Does anybody know what causes the spikes. Yeah I'd be interested to know as well. I wonder if creation/tear-down of sessions does that. A conference in session should eventually get to a stable CPU consumption. You might want to have a test system and either through sipsak or manually create a bunch of conferences and watch the CPU. If you're playing the entry/exit sounds, recoding and announcing names, playing participant counts and all of these are non-ulaw encoded prompts etc. you will get those spikes as that's where codec-translation will happen. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- asterisk-users mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users