Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-09 Thread Jeff Wright
 I have used it successfully to move PC's from one machine to another with
 a clean install and the former install.
 I t does want two machines though, but it works great, only draw back is
 it is a once use program.
 Must buy a separate license each tome you move it.

 Limited and costly.

 Another part of the buyers remorse thing that happens after the real cost of
 Windows is tallied.

Then use what comes with Windows.

http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E8E5CC039D51E3DB!23641.entry


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-09 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:40 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

Then use what comes with Windows.
http://adacosta.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E8E5CC039D51E3DB!23641.entry


And what about my applications? This does the easy part and leaves me  
stuck with the hard part.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Roy Ackerman,Ph.D.,P.Ch.E.,E.A.
There are plenty of W7 drivers- including NVidia.
My machine is running just fine- the upgrade took less than 1.5 hours-mostly 
because MS kept telling me what programs might not work (the same one it told 
me would not work with Vista- which I did have to modify).  It took more than 6 
hours to upgrade to Vista from XP.
I know the logic about clean installs- but it would take more than 20 hours for 
me to reinstall my programs (and that assumes I can still find the install 
disks- and NOT have to install an older version followed by the upgrade since I 
have at least five progams that have upgrade disks not the original install 
disks).
My computer is maxed out at 3 Gigs of RAM (but I am NOT running 64 bit anyway). 
 It now runs at 25% vs 45% on Vista.
The problem I have seen is that most vendors have NOT made drivers for 64 bits 
(Adobe, Dragon, Western Digital [external drive/webaccess- but we made our own 
for the client], etc.)- no matter what flavor software you use.  Hence, you 
can't run them and use more memory...



From: Tony B ton...@gmail.com
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 11:48 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain 

Actually, I do. There are no obvious defects in it as it stands. Nor
are there any defects in Vista, though driver support was woefully
slow to materialize.

And I bet the same will be true of Win7. I wonder how many engineers
at e.g. Nvidia are working on Win7 drivers right now? Probably none.
They'll wait until the release date, then they'll schedule a meeting,
then they'll discuss it a while. Many manufacturers will then decide
not to update drivers at all, instead preferring to have everyone
throw away the old hardware and buy new.

On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:39 PM, t.piwowar wrote:
 1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$ works
 out the defects. Meanwhile you will you will be using XP, a version that has
 been worked on long enough to have fixed many of the worse defects.

*
** List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy **
** policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/ **
*




*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Jeff Wright
 1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$
 works out the defects. Meanwhile you will you will be using XP, a
 version that has been worked on long enough to have fixed many of the
 worse defects.

I can hear Tom now at home now, whimpering like Dr. Smith from Lost in
Space, Oh, Will, the pain, the pain.  I simply can't bear to try it

MS is actually ahead of the game in driver support; they've insisted that
there won't be the problem as there was with Vista and so far, that claim
has been delivered.

When I installed the beta on a new laptop at work, Dell had no video drivers
on their site that would install. All would bork out claiming the OS wasn't
supported, even for Vista drivers.  Instead, I used the Windows update
driver function and had it pull down drivers from the MS database.  Viola!
Video drivers that worked.  In fact, *all* of the other drivers were native
to the OS.

Other than that, my Win7 experience has been almost boring in that regard;
no problems at all.

So, again, I ask, who should you listen to?  Someone like Tom who's never
even touched Windows 7 or from people who have actual experience installing
and using it?  (And no, you don't *have* to upgrade.)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
I've been running the Beta for Win7 for a couple of weeks on a four year old
machine (HP Pavillion a720n- Athalon XP 2.2ghz).  XP was due for a reinstall
so I thought that I would play around with Win7.

It runs OK except when iTunes gets going but that was how iTunes ran in XP
on that machine.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jeff Wright jswri...@gmail.com wrote:

  1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$
  works out the defects. Meanwhile you will you will be using XP, a
  version that has been worked on long enough to have fixed many of the
  worse defects.

 I can hear Tom now at home now, whimpering like Dr. Smith from Lost in
 Space, Oh, Will, the pain, the pain.  I simply can't bear to try it

 MS is actually ahead of the game in driver support; they've insisted that
 there won't be the problem as there was with Vista and so far, that claim
 has been delivered.

 When I installed the beta on a new laptop at work, Dell had no video
 drivers
 on their site that would install. All would bork out claiming the OS wasn't
 supported, even for Vista drivers.  Instead, I used the Windows update
 driver function and had it pull down drivers from the MS database.  Viola!
 Video drivers that worked.  In fact, *all* of the other drivers were native
 to the OS.

 Other than that, my Win7 experience has been almost boring in that regard;
 no problems at all.

 So, again, I ask, who should you listen to?  Someone like Tom who's never
 even touched Windows 7 or from people who have actual experience installing
 and using it?  (And no, you don't *have* to upgrade.)


 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *




-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 8, 2009, at 6:50 AM, Roy Ackerman,Ph.D.,P.Ch.E.,E.A. wrote:
I know the logic about clean installs- but it would take more than  
20 hours for me to reinstall my programs (and that assumes I can  
still find the install disks- and NOT have to install an older  
version followed by the upgrade since I have at least five progams  
that have upgrade disks not the original install disks).


OS X supports a fresh install of the OS and then migrates  
applications and user settings over. It works very well, even  
retaining product activation for many applications. Is there no third- 
party vendor who has figured out how to do the same for Windows?




 



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
I can hear Tom now at home now, whimpering like Dr. Smith from  
Lost in
Space, Oh, Will, the pain, the pain.  I simply can't bear to try  
it


Correction, if you are a computer hobbyist in need to massive  
entertainment then by all means go get W7. In fact you should be  
playing with the beta now. If you use your computer to preform useful  
tasks, especially tasks that earn you money, give it a year or two.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.
Tom, Tom, Tom---
For those of us who work - with real things- we do employ Windows.
Financial, Science, and Engineering (ok, the first doesn't make anything
either)- rely on Windows Apps.  
You are welcome to use your Mac, I am more than proficient at completing
multiple assignments using my base.  And, like the terrible modem apps, I
run rings around those of you completing my tasks compared to those on the
Mac.
To each his own- but let's keep delusions and persnicketiness relegated to
the politicians.

Eschew Obfuscation

This is a reply from: 
Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. 
  Financial, Managerial, and Technical Services
for the Professional, Non-Profit, and the Entrepreneurial Organization

  703.548.1343 voice 
  703.783.1340 fax 
  

From thinking to doing, from sales to profits, from tax to investments- we
are YOUR adjuvancy

-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com]
On Behalf Of t.piwowar
Sent: 06/08/2009 10:41 AM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:11 AM, Jeff Wright wrote:
 I can hear Tom now at home now, whimpering like Dr. Smith from  
 Lost in
 Space, Oh, Will, the pain, the pain.  I simply can't bear to try  
 it

Correction, if you are a computer hobbyist in need to massive  
entertainment then by all means go get W7. In fact you should be  
playing with the beta now. If you use your computer to preform useful  
tasks, especially tasks that earn you money, give it a year or two.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

Yes there is.


Please tell us. This would be very useful for many of us (even me!).


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall

Laplink PC Mover

I have used it successfully to move PC's from one machine to another 
with a clean install and the former install.


I t does want two machines though, but it works great, only draw back 
is it is a once use program.


Must buy a separate license each tome you move it.

I have not used it with XP to Vista, but it does a wonderful XP - XP 
move and is supposed to be good from XP-Vista also.


Buy the full one with the high speed USB cable.

Stewart


At 09:56 AM 6/8/2009, you wrote:

On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:

Yes there is.


Please tell us. This would be very useful for many of us (even me!).


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 8, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. wrote:

For those of us who work - with real things- we do employ Windows.
Financial, Science, and Engineering (ok, the first doesn't make  
anything

either)- rely on Windows Apps.


I also tell Mac folks to not adopt new versions too quickly. When OS  
X.5 was released I told folks to wait for X.5.2 or X.5.3. For most of  
my clients we waited for X.5.5. Back at Apple's big transition I  
entirely skipped X.0, X.1, and X.2 as not ready for prime time. The  
first good version was X.3.3, I number I remember well. Then X.3.4  
and X.4.5 introduced bugs so I skipped them too.


I see no reason to rush out and buy new versions. Especially so when  
the older version is now well known and stable.


To my eye, telling people to immediately rush out to get the new  
release, just makes WFBs look more foolish.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 8, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

Agreed, except that unless you have set yourself up to run as a
non-admin, Win7 is far more secure than XP out of the box.


This is just advertising for a operating system that is still in  
beta. You have no way to know that it is true. Spouting such  
marketing blather reduces your credibility to zero.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.
Have used that for XP to XP and XP to Vista.
Have also used the Windows Migration successfully (XP to Vista and XP to XP.
Works for files and settings- NOT computer programs.  Works best over IP.)
There are five other programs of which I am aware- this one is the fastest
(but NOT the cheapest).  SoftRescue is probably a second choice.

Eschew Obfuscation

This is a reply from: 
Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. 
  Financial, Managerial, and Technical Services
for the Professional, Non-Profit, and the Entrepreneurial Organization

  703.548.1343 voice 
  703.783.1340 fax 
  

From thinking to doing, from sales to profits, from tax to investments- we
are YOUR adjuvancy


-Original Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com]
On Behalf Of Rev. Stewart Marshall
Sent: 06/08/2009 11:40 AM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

Laplink PC Mover

I have used it successfully to move PC's from one machine to another 
with a clean install and the former install.

I t does want two machines though, but it works great, only draw back 
is it is a once use program.

Must buy a separate license each tome you move it.

I have not used it with XP to Vista, but it does a wonderful XP - XP 
move and is supposed to be good from XP-Vista also.

Buy the full one with the high speed USB cable.

Stewart


At 09:56 AM 6/8/2009, you wrote:
On Jun 8, 2009, at 10:42 AM, Rev. Stewart Marshall wrote:
Yes there is.

Please tell us. This would be very useful for many of us (even me!).


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*

Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A.
Your statement (security) may only be true because it is new and no one has
built attacks against it yet.


Eschew Obfuscation

This is a reply from: 
Roy A. Ackerman, Ph.D., E.A. 
  


-Truncated Message-
From: Computer Guys Discussion List [mailto:computerguy...@listserv.aol.com]
On Behalf Of Jeff Wright
Sent: 06/08/2009 12:17 PM
To: COMPUTERGUYS-L@LISTSERV.AOL.COM
Subject: Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain


 I see no reason to rush out and buy new versions. Especially so when the
 older version is now well known and stable.

Agreed, except that unless you have set yourself up to run as a
non-admin, Win7 is far more secure than XP out of the box.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Jeff Wright
 This is just advertising for a operating system that is still in beta. You
 have no way to know that it is true. Spouting such marketing blather reduces
 your credibility to zero.

O Rlly?  You and others keep telling us how 7 is little more than
Vista 2nd Ed. and Vista is many times more secure out of the box than
XP.

I'm not sure why I bothered to reply, given your total and complete
level of ignorance regarding this OS.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Jeff Wright
 Your statement (security) may only be true because it is new and no one has
 built attacks against it yet.

Not so.  Not running with admin rights by default, as you do with XP,
is much more secure, period.  YMMV.

With Vista and 7, you run with reduced rights until you need to
perform an action that requires elevated permissions.  UAC performs
that function.  This is not to say that UAC is the best implementation
of that function, I'd rather have a password prompt, but it seems to
be working.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread John Duncan Yoyo
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 On Jun 8, 2009, at 12:16 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

 Agreed, except that unless you have set yourself up to run as a
 non-admin, Win7 is far more secure than XP out of the box.


 This is just advertising for a operating system that is still in beta. You
 have no way to know that it is true. Spouting such marketing blather reduces
 your credibility to zero.


Given what security features that are switched on in Vista/Win7 when first
installed that were off by design in XP  it isn't that high a hurdle to
jump.



-- 
John Duncan Yoyo
---o)


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Jeff Wright
 Given what security features that are switched on in Vista/Win7 when first
 installed that were off by design in XP  it isn't that high a hurdle to
 jump.

Even so, this doesn't detract from the validity of the statement.
Vista/7 are far more secure than XP in a default installation, what
the vast majority of home users will run.

XP can be made secure. I have about 100 people running XP as a
non-hardened LUA user and IE as their only browser, with only
client-based anti-virus and a perimeter firewall.  We haven't had a
malware issue since 2002, when we still ran Win98 and the virus came
in on a system that had a non-functioning A/V via web mail.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar
Okay, so it is buzzword compliant. But how does it work in the real  
world? You don't know and I don't know. All I have to go on is the  
company's past track record of broken promises about security. All  
you have to go on is a list of buzzwords from their PR department and  
some limited personal testing. So all this proves is that your  
gullibility score is much higher than mine.



On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:


Agreed, except that unless you have set yourself up to run as a
non-admin, Win7 is far more secure than XP out of the box.


This is just advertising for a operating system that is still in
beta. You have no way to know that it is true. Spouting such
marketing blather reduces your credibility to zero.


Yeah, except...no.  XP doesn't have kernel patch protection, service
hardening, data execution prevention, address space layout  
randomization,
mandatory integrity levels, UAC, BitLocker, AppLocker, or  
DirectAccess.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

O Rlly?  You and others keep telling us how 7 is little more than
Vista 2nd Ed. and Vista is many times more secure out of the box than
XP.


We do not define security by comparing said new version to XP. That  
is setting the bar much too low.


Once again you are trying to cheat.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread mike
Then we'll compare it to OS X...oh wait...that was taken out in seconds at
the last pwn to own contest...

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:40 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Jeff Wright wrote:

 O Rlly?  You and others keep telling us how 7 is little more than
 Vista 2nd Ed. and Vista is many times more secure out of the box than
 XP.


 We do not define security by comparing said new version to XP. That is
 setting the bar much too low.

 Once again you are trying to cheat.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread mike
Limited personal testing for months...proves you know a lot less then me.

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:37 PM, t.piwowar t...@tjpa.com wrote:

 Okay, so it is buzzword compliant. But how does it work in the real world?
 You don't know and I don't know. All I have to go on is the company's past
 track record of broken promises about security. All you have to go on is a
 list of buzzwords from their PR department and some limited personal
 testing. So all this proves is that your gullibility score is much higher
 than mine.


 On Jun 8, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Chris Dunford wrote:

  Agreed, except that unless you have set yourself up to run as a
 non-admin, Win7 is far more secure than XP out of the box.


 This is just advertising for a operating system that is still in
 beta. You have no way to know that it is true. Spouting such
 marketing blather reduces your credibility to zero.


 Yeah, except...no.  XP doesn't have kernel patch protection, service
 hardening, data execution prevention, address space layout randomization,
 mandatory integrity levels, UAC, BitLocker, AppLocker, or DirectAccess.



 *
 **  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
 **  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
 *



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-08 Thread Wayne Dernoncourt
Rev. Stewart Marshall
 Most vista drivers are supposed to work out of the box.  So
 far I only found one that did not, and it was HP which is
 notoriously slow in releasing updates.

A friend of mine at work ended up buying another XP system when
the scanner vendor wouldn't supply Vista drivers (and didn't
have plans to supply them, the machine was no longer being sold,
etc.)

-- 
Take care  | This clown speaks for himself, his job doesn't
Wayne D.   | supply this, at least not directly
I've seen better legs in a bucket of chicken ...


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


[CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Marcio
Here in Brazil the news are in the papers. Microsoft will start selling Windows 
7 on October 22. To my dismay no upgrade from XP. Only from Vista. And I have a 
brasilian XP Home and a US XP Professional. I have a Vista to put on the top of 
the XP Professional...and...then... Windows 7? I guess I will have to start 
from scratch with my new office computer that has XP Home. Hate that! Why is 
microsoft doing this to me?

Marcio


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Roger D. Parish

At 10:19 PM -0300 6/7/09, Marcio wrote:

Here in Brazil the news are in the papers. Microsoft will start 
selling Windows 7 on October 22. To my dismay no upgrade from XP. 
Only from Vista. And I have a brasilian XP Home and a US XP 
Professional. I have a Vista to put on the top of the XP 
Professional...and...then... Windows 7? I guess I will have to start 
from scratch with my new office computer that has XP Home. Hate 
that! Why is microsoft doing this to me?


They're not, Marcio. You are doing it to yourself. You do not HAVE to 
upgrade if what you have does everything you want it to do. Keep 
using what you have, and when it needs replacement in a year or two, 
then you will get the latest and greatest already installed. Don't 
bother to upgrade.


--
Roger
Lovettsville, VA


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Tony B
You of all people should know by now that when you install a new
version of Windows you should do it clean. Don't upgrade.

Besides, as I recall, you bought that (those?) machine(s) long after
Vista was out, but you stubbornly insisted on XP. We have a saying in
the US: You made your bed, now you have to lie in it.


On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Marciom...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
 Here in Brazil the news are in the papers. Microsoft will start selling 
 Windows 7 on October 22. To my dismay no upgrade from XP. Only from Vista. 
 And I have a brasilian XP Home and a US XP Professional. I have a Vista to 
 put on the top of the XP Professional...and...then... Windows 7? I guess I 
 will have to start from scratch with my new office computer that has XP Home. 
 Hate that! Why is microsoft doing this to me?


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Reid Katan

Quoting Marcio m...@ix.netcom.com:

Here in Brazil the news are in the papers. Microsoft will start   
selling Windows 7 on October 22. To my dismay no upgrade from XP.   
Only from Vista. And I have a brasilian XP Home and a US XP   
Professional. I have a Vista to put on the top of the XP   
Professional...and...then... Windows 7? I guess I will have to start  
 from scratch with my new office computer that has XP Home. Hate   
that! Why is microsoft doing this to me?


Microsoft isn't doing anything to you. No one says you have to upgrade  
to Win7 when it comes out. XP is not going to expire on October 23.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Jeff Wright
 Here in Brazil the news are in the papers. Microsoft will start selling
 Windows 7 on October 22. To my dismay no upgrade from XP. Only from
 Vista. And I have a brasilian XP Home and a US XP Professional. I have
 a Vista to put on the top of the XP Professional...and...then...
 Windows 7? I guess I will have to start from scratch with my new office
 computer that has XP Home. Hate that! Why is microsoft doing this to
 me?

If you're dead-set on upgrading to Win7, then yes, upgrading from the upgraded 
Vista *should* work, but nothing is for sure at this point, since it's still in 
beta.

The good news is that installing Windows 7 doesn't take as long as it did with 
XP.  It's about 20-30 minute clean install.  Upgrades tend to be longer.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread t.piwowar

On Jun 7, 2009, at 9:19 PM, Marcio wrote:
Here in Brazil the news are in the papers. Microsoft will start  
selling Windows 7 on October 22. To my dismay no upgrade from XP.  
Only from Vista. And I have a brasilian XP Home and a US XP  
Professional. I have a Vista to put on the top of the XP  
Professional...and...then... Windows 7? I guess I will have to start  
from scratch with my new office computer that has XP Home. Hate  
that! Why is microsoft doing this to me?


1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$  
works out the defects. Meanwhile you will you will be using XP, a  
version that has been worked on long enough to have fixed many of the  
worse defects.


2) The only sensible way to upgrade to a new Windows OS is to erase  
the drive and install Windows from scratch. So you really have nothing  
to complain about. Don't think you can upgrade like a Mac user does,  
Windows is not that kind of technology.



*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Tony B
Actually, I do. There are no obvious defects in it as it stands. Nor
are there any defects in Vista, though driver support was woefully
slow to materialize.

And I bet the same will be true of Win7. I wonder how many engineers
at e.g. Nvidia are working on Win7 drivers right now? Probably none.
They'll wait until the release date, then they'll schedule a meeting,
then they'll discuss it a while. Many manufacturers will then decide
not to update drivers at all, instead preferring to have everyone
throw away the old hardware and buy new.


On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:39 PM, t.piwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:
 1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$ works
 out the defects. Meanwhile you will you will be using XP, a version that has
 been worked on long enough to have fixed many of the worse defects.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Rev. Stewart Marshall
Most vista drivers are supposed to work out of the box.  So far I 
only found one that did not, and it was HP which is notoriously slow 
in releasing updates.


Stewart


At 10:46 PM 6/7/2009, you wrote:

Actually, I do. There are no obvious defects in it as it stands. Nor
are there any defects in Vista, though driver support was woefully
slow to materialize.

And I bet the same will be true of Win7. I wonder how many engineers
at e.g. Nvidia are working on Win7 drivers right now? Probably none.
They'll wait until the release date, then they'll schedule a meeting,
then they'll discuss it a while. Many manufacturers will then decide
not to update drivers at all, instead preferring to have everyone
throw away the old hardware and buy new.


On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:39 PM, t.piwowart...@tjpa.com wrote:
 1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$ works
 out the defects. Meanwhile you will you will be using XP, a 
version that has

 been worked on long enough to have fixed many of the worse defects.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Rev. Stewart A. Marshall
mailto:popoz...@earthlink.net
Prince of Peace www.princeofpeaceozark.org
Ozark, AL  SL 82


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*


Re: [CGUYS] Windows 7 pain

2009-06-07 Thread Chris Dunford
 1) You don't want Win7 right now. It will be a year or two before M$
 works out the defects.

Do you laugh when you write this ridiculous stuff? Because it really reminds
me of that I told them we already had one! line from Holy Grail.


*
**  List info, subscription management, list rules, archives, privacy  **
**  policy, calmness, a member map, and more at http://www.cguys.org/  **
*