[389-12284720-012E] Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing Messages

2009-08-26 Thread Scush Sales Support
 

Hello,

Please be aware we are receiving copies of the messages below which appear to 
contain privacy data. You may wish to switch to direct emails.

Regards,
Mike

Scush Inc.
scush.com

Think green - don't print!  


 From: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:18:56 -0400
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing Messages  
Scott, I received your message and I will be calling you shortly to have a
look at your server. Thanks. 

- Original Message - 
From: Scott Fosseen [Prairie Lakes AEA] sfoss...@aea8.k12.ia.us
To: decludejunkmail declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 26, 2009 1:39 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Missing Messages  I am running SmarterMail 5 with 
declude.

 My mail server has been a little odd for the last few days. I have people
 complaining about not getting mail, but yet some mail is getting through.

 One particular problem.

 I can send an email from outside the problem mail server. I see the
message
 in the SMTP log file, but it never shows in the Virus or Junkmail log. I
 don't seem to have any folders that are growing in size, I just don't see
 where the message went, or why it was not processed by Declude.

 I am running a tail on the log files, and there are messages going through
 just fine as well.
 _
 This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
 solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
 If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute
or
 copy this e-mail. Your are asked to notify the sender immediately by
e-mail
 if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from
your
 system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are
 solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
Prairie
 Lakes Area Education Agency. Prairie Lakes Area Education Agency accepts
no
 liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. -
 _
 Scott Fosseen - Systems Engineer - Prairie Lakes AEA -
 http://www.aea8.k12.ia.us/tech
 _
 Upper Case: The luggage on the top of the pile.
 Caps Lock: A fastening to keep your hat on your head.
 Keyboard: The row of hooks where you keep your keys.
 Space Bar: A sleazy joint where Martians like to hang out.
 _




 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

  

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [384-0F3A4F35-96D8] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-02-04 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[384-0F3A4F35-96D8].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [0AC-0F2F1668-54D5] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-27 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[0AC-0F2F1668-54D5].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [1A6-0F2F1667-8C86] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-27 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[1A6-0F2F1667-8C86].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [32D-0F2E28E3-D4C1] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-26 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[32D-0F2E28E3-D4C1].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [244-0F1D628C-258E] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2008-01-13 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[244-0F1D628C-258E].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [35B-0EDF437D-8B7F] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-11-27 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[35B-0EDF437D-8B7F].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [1CD-0E690ED8-5E5B] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-08-30 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[1CD-0E690ED8-5E5B].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [37A-0DF9A964-4718] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-06-06 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[37A-0DF9A964-4718].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [052-0DA5FA77-DED9] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2007-04-04 Thread support
 

Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is 
[052-0DA5FA77-DED9].

Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject 
(including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.

The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have 
had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 
1-866-332-5833Thank You.

Declude Technical Support

view this ticket online


---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [325-0CD4C030-CDA5] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2006-10-27 Thread support
 
		Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [325-0CD4C030-CDA5].
		Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue.
		The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 1-866-332-5833Thank You.Declude Technical Support

---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] re: [17B-0CC41FA9-5FDA] You do not have permission to post to the declude.junkmail@declude.com list

2006-10-14 Thread support
Thank you for submitting a ticket to support. Your ticket number is [17B-0CC41FA9-5FDA]. Please keep this ticket number for your records and include it in the subject (including brackets) of all future emails regarding this issue. The response time during business hours is usually within 24 hours, if you have had no response in this time please do not hesitate to call our support number 1-866-332-5833IMPORTANT NOTICEDeclude is migrating to a new CRM business solution which includes a new case management module. We will begin using this feature soon, the result of this action means that Declude will no longer accept and create support cases using the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED]You will need to login into your Declude account to submit a case. If you can not submit a case due to the option being "grayed out" this means that you do not have an active service agreement. Call customer care 866-332-5822 #3 to purchase or renew a service agreement.  We understand that this will be awkward and/or unwanted, however our goal is to continue servicing our paying customers.Thank You.Declude Technical Support 
---This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  Tounsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], andtype "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be foundat http://www.mail-archive.com.

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend

2005-12-27 Thread Avolve Support
Try thinking in terms of a programming language and it will come to light.

;)

Avolve Support
Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless !
http://www.avolvewireless.net

-- Original Message --
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date:  Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:22:38 -0600

You guys see the problem here, right?   We're all getting so damn old nobody
can remember anything for certain  LOL!!!



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harvey Rench
 Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2005 10:42 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com; Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend
 
 I remember it being a Novell Netware term.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 At 11:23 AM 12/22/2005, Don Brown wrote:
 I think so, too and I don't think it had anything to do with
 Microsoft, either.  It was a common term around a mainframe shop.
 
 
 Wednesday, December 21, 2005, 4:09:03 PM, Darin Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 DC
 DC
 DC I thought that went further back than that.  I  remember hearing
 DC it a lot from mainframe types prior to Windows 1.1early  80's...
 DC
 
 DC Darin.
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC - Original Message -
 DC From: Nick  Hayer
 DC
 DC To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 DC
 DC Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 4:51 PM
 DC
 DC Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeproc abend
 DC
 
 DC John T (Lists) wrote:
 DC
 
 DC
 DC Is abend some kindof French word?
 DC AbnormalEnding. - circa 1985  - coined with the introduction of
 Microsoft products.
 
 DC -Nicko
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC ;)
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC JohnT
 DC
 DC eServices ForYou
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC -OriginalMessage-
 DC From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 DC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 GoranJovanovic
 DC Sent:  Wednesday, December 21,2005 1:13PM
 DC To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 DC Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Decludeprocabend
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC I have haddecludeproc 3.0.5.22 abend on me twice today. Is
 DC there anything I should bedoing to capture information about
 DC this? I have automatic restart enabled soit starts again but I
 DC am not super happy with it abending.
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC Any hints on what (ifanything) I can/should be doing?
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC
 DC GoranJovanovic
 DC
 DC OmegaNetwork Solutions
 
 DC
 
 
 
 Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA Internet Concepts, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]   http://www.inetconcepts.net
 (972) 788-2364Fax: (972) 788-5049
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 
 Harvey Rench
 Senior Network Engineer
 Clayton Homes, Inc.
 865-380-3000
 Visit us at www.Clayton.net
 
 
 
 Confidentiality Notice
 This message and the accompanying documents may contain information that
 is privileged, confidential, or exempt from disclosure under applicable
 law.  If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient, you are
 hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading,
 disseminating, distributing, or copying this communication.  If you have
 received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and
 destroy the original transmission. Thank you.
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]


 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] does anyone punish email from these folks?

2005-12-27 Thread Avolve Support
We block them also as of 12-20-05

Avolve Support
Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless !
http://www.avolvewireless.net

-- Original Message --
From: Mike K @ NetDotCom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date:  Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:02:46 -0500

We outright reject all their mail.

We started by just holding and found lots of 'suspicious' activity like 
identical emails with different from domains, etc. Normal spam type stuff CC 
offers, grant money, etc.

The we started blocked one /24, then they switched to other subnets so we 
blocked their entire IP space.

No complaints from users.

Mike

  - Original Message - 
  From: Nick Hayer 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 10:36
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] does anyone punish email from these folks?


  I sure do get allot of spam from this ip space - are they legit and are 
 lacking in their monitoring or ?
  Thanks -

  -Nick


OrgName:WholeSale Internet 
OrgID:  WHOLE-125
Address:1102 Grand Ave Suite 905
City:   Kansas City
StateProv:  MO
PostalCode: 64106
Country:US

NetRange:   69.30.192.0 - 69.30.239.255 
CIDR:   69.30.192.0/19, 69.30.224.0/20 
NetName:WHOLESALEINTERNET



--


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.1/206 - Release Date: 12/16/2005


 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
We've been using Nuvio since April of this year and have not looked back. Have 
not experience the problems that we encountered with Commpartners.us or Vonage, 
the quality has been much better than expected.

Vonage didn't work well over our wireless network for unknown reasons except 
for the way they play with mac addresses.

We have the residential ata's in place and we use the nPBX versions of the 
service in the office over our wireless and it just flat out works great.

Oh, well we can also resell it too, but so do a lot of people. It works great 
here.

;)

Avolve Support
Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless !
http://www.avolvewireless.net

-- Original Message --
From: Marc Catuogno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date:  Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:35:21 -0500

I have been considering switching many of our office from POTS lines to
COVAD voice over IP.  Since this is such a diverse and well informed group,
I was wonder if anyone has any experience with them or suggestions as to
alternate VOIP providers. Off list replies are welcomed.

Thanks -

Marc

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]


 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
You can do that with Nuvio, especially with the nPBX service. Main number 
somewhere else, extension phone in some other state. Voicemail, caller-id, 
3-way calling, call transfer, call fowarding and much more. 
http://voip.avolve.net

I'm practicing, can ya tell. No seriously it works great.

Avolve Support
Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless !
http://www.avolvewireless.net

-- Original Message --
From: Dave Beckstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date:  Tue, 13 Dec 2005 11:22:41 -0600

Hi Guys,

I have a T-1 in my house and I work from a home office in Minnesota.  I have
a sales person in New Mexico.

Ideally, I'd like a VOIP service where when someone called me they would get
a message like press 1 for sales, press 2 for Dave. The idea being that it
would route the call either to her or to me.  We would need voicemail and
caller ID too.

Does Vonage provide these kinds of services and if not does anyone have
another service they might recommend?  I want to give callers the impression
that we are a much larger company then we are.

Thanks!



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Evans Martin
 Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 5:57 PM
 To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
 Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP
 
 I have been using Vonage at home and love it.  I had tried Lingo before
 Vonage and HATED it, although I think most of the problems were due to the
 D-Link hardware that they supplied.
 
 I have had some experience with Linux based PBX systems and have found
 them
 to be much more cost effective than hardware PBXs.  This along with VoIP
 really has the possibility of cutting quite a bit of cost around the
 office.
 
 Evans Martin
 
 ---
 EVANS MARTIN  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 HOSTING:  http://www.martek.net
 PROGRAMMING:  http://www.martekware.com
 
 iPlus Info Browser - IPB's IMail Migration Tool, password browser,
 reporting
 suite make IPlus Info Browser something no IMail administrator should be
 without.  http://www.martek.net/Default.aspx?tabid=96
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
  Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 11:35 AM
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: COVAD VOIP
 
  I have been considering switching many of our office from POTS lines to
  COVAD voice over IP.  Since this is such a diverse and well informed
  group,
  I was wonder if anyone has any experience with them or suggestions as to
  alternate VOIP providers. Off list replies are welcomed.
 
  Thanks -
 
  Marc
 
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.
  ---
  [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]


 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Spoolfiles t's, d's, a's q's

2005-12-13 Thread Avolve Support
How do you get T, D or even A files to process with Declude if they are in the 
Imail spool directory. For kicks I rename a T file to a 'q' file and made the 
corresponding D file a 'd' file and placed them in the proc directory and I 
think they got delivered.

So one would think that all T files have to be a 'q' and all D files have to be 
a 'd' to get processed from the proc directory ?
 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude EVA www.declude.com]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword

2005-11-28 Thread support




Two options - check the headers of the message 
it should indicate the line (assuming the test is set to warn). If not you 
need log level high for it to show the line number in the logs.

Darrell
Check 
out http://www.invariantsystems.com for 
utilities for Declude And Imail. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, 
SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Richard 
  Farris 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  
  Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 8:11 
  PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Keyword
  
  If you find your are holding mail because of a 
  keyword, how do you find out which keyword it is?
  Richard FarrisEthixs Online1.270.247. 
  Office1.800.548.3877 Tech Support"Crossroads to a Cleaner 
  Internet


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 2.06 with Imail 8.21

2005-09-13 Thread Avolve Support
Go back to 2.0.5 and change the time between retries and watch the overflow 
directory.

Avolve Support
Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless !
http://www.avolvewireless.net

-- Original Message --
From: Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Date:  Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:31:44 -0400

This is a known bug with 2.0.6.  I wrote up some of my findings on this 
under 2.0.6 - see this post. 

http://www.mail-archive.com/declude.junkmail@declude.com/msg24938.html 

Darrell
 
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG 
Integration, and Log Parsers. 

Spaminator writes: 

 Greetings all, 
 
 We're planning on upgrading to iMail 8.21 this week, and wanted to see if 
 anyone know of any significant problems with this latest release and Declude 
 2.06+AV+FProt+Sniffer+invURIbl2.5. 
 
 We're still affected by too many Declude processes that somehow get spawned, 
 locking up mail processing (the server needs to be rebooted 2-3 times a week 
 because way more than the max limit of 25 Declude processes run, causing 
 mail processing to more or less stop and routing everything to the overflow 
 folder). 
 
 Thanks! 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]


 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Declude Fix/Update Above 2.0.6 ?

2005-07-26 Thread Avolve Support
Any word on the fix to stop the errors that have been cropping up with 2.0.6 
and beta .16 with the latest Imail versions ? 





Sent via the WebMail system at avolve.net


 
   
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SpamCop blacklist Misdirected bounces

2005-04-12 Thread Technical Support



I 
just found out that our mail server has been blacklisted by spamcop, apparently 
for "Misdirected bounces" which seems to be nothing more than bouncing a message 
after first accepting it (I pasted Spamcop's explanation below). 
I'm running 
Imail v8.05 with declude v1.82, and I'm not sure how to fix this to Spamcop's 
satisfaction. Has anyone else had this issue before, and if so, what can 
be done to fix it?

Thanks 
much,

Tom 
Wright



Problem: Misdirected bounces 
Description: When a mail server accepts a message and later decides that it 
can't deliver the message, it is required to send back a bounce email to the 
sender of the original message. These bounce emails are often misdirected. 
Solution: Upgrade and/or configure your mail server software so that this 
situation is never encountered. Configure your software to either reject 
messages during delivery or accept them permanently. Do not let your software 
make choices about delivery after it has accepted a message. If you must accept 
delivery before you know the status of a message, then file it internally - do 
not send, forward or bounce it outside your organization. The errant message can 
be placed in a special folder or routed to your 
postmaster


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] URI Blacklist External Program Beta Now Posted For Download

2004-12-28 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Fred, 

While invURIBL will catch a lot of SPAM - I still would recommend folks use 
Sniffer.  The thing to keep in mind is that Sniffer triggers on many other 
aspects of SPAM other than URI data. 

Darrell 

Frederick Samarelli writes: 

It looks like it may be a redundant test to sniffer. 

Everything INV-URIBL catches so does SNIFFER. 

Fred
  - Original Message - 
  From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
  To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
  Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 10:32 PM
  Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] URI Blacklist External Program Beta Now Posted For Download 

  We have released a public beta of our URI lookup tool at http://www.invariantsystems.com/invuribl/default.htm.  In addition, we have posted some stats on how effective the tool is on our system at http://www.invariantsystems.com/invuribl/stats.htm. 

  For a more detailed description on the tool please see the below message or send me a note with any questions.
  Darrell
- Original Message - 
From: Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) 
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com 
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 11:13 PM
Subject: URI Blacklist External Program 

We have wrote an external application that extracts URI's from a message and checks them against a URI Blacklist. For those not familar with URI blacklists here is how the folks at surbl.org describe it. 

Surbl blacklists differ from most other RBLs in that they're used to detect spam based on message body URIs (usually web sites). Unlike most other RBLs, SURBLs are not used to block spam senders. Instead they allow you to block messages that have spam domains which occur in message bodies.  

We have been running this application in production for the last week against multi.surbl.org.  We have also tested the application against several of the other SURBL lists with the same level of sucess. 

If you are interested in testing or running the software please join the following list [EMAIL PROTECTED]  During the beta period this is where we will be communicating about the application.  For some of the applications basic features and implementation requirements please see http://www.invariantsystems.com/invuribl/default.htm.  We expect to release a beta version within the next couple days. 

If you would like any additional information prior to joining the list please let me know,
Darrell 

---
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Overflow Directory

2004-12-15 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Has anyone had any success with bumping that up?  If so, what values seemed 
to work for you?  I know the big concern is hitting the mystery heap limit. 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Darin Cox writes: 

In IMail versions 8 and above the setting for Delivery Threads is in the
Queue Manager.  Default is 30. 

Darin. 

- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Overflow Directory 

 

What is the max number of declude processes that will kick off if there
are lots of Q*.SMD messages in the overflow directory? Is there an
internal limit or is it based on some option?
There is no limit, if you want to be technical. 

Specifically, Declude counts the total number of service-started processes
(Declude.exe, SMTP32.exe, and a few others), as it is service-started
processes that need to be counted. 

The number Declude looks for is by default 30, but is based on the IMail
SMTP settings (or it may only be accessible via the registry? I cannot
recall). 

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. 


This outgoing message is guaranteed to be authentic by Message Level users.
Guarantee the authenticity of your email @ http://www.messagelevel.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Imail/Declude queues backing up

2004-12-14 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
I have just spent the last 24 hours slowly feeding messages back into
the message queue after queue manager quit delivering. It has happened
before, and I have seen posts on the Imail list discussing queue
manager hanging.  The real problem is, the service is running, it just
isn't doing anything.
Charles not that this solves your issue, but this happens to us about once a 
month or so.  Usually just a restart fixes the issue.  I suspect it could be 
a bad message that kills it internally.  However, I have never been able to 
hunt that message down or get a break on what is causing the issue. 

Because of this issue I wrote a Windows service that not only monitors the 
imail queue it also monitors the declude overflow directory.  You can setup 
different types of alerts (size and growth percentage) to notify you or run 
an external script when things exceed your thresholds.  This has saved me 
many times.  It's always better to get an alert when the queue has 1000 
Q*.smd files backed up than 50K... 

If your interested in this app you can grab a copy of QueueMon from my link 
below. 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] relays.visi.com down?

2004-12-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Does anyone know if relays.visi.com is officially down?  I havent had a hit 
against it since early November. 

RSL - relays.visi.com 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] ed10.com - E-Dialog

2004-12-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Does anyone have any feedback on E-Dialog.com.  It appears their are several 
reputable companies using them (NFL, Reuters, etc). 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] WAY OT: Syslog entries from Cisco ACL question

2004-12-08 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Rick, 

My understanding is if the packet is rejected or allowed before the port 
information is needed for comparison Cisco IOS will log it as port 0. 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Rick Davidson writes: 

Does anyone know what traffic uses a destination and source port of 0? Or 
what else I should look for? This is a Novell/windows network 

I have something odd going on at a large branch office so I added an acl 
to log the inbound and outbound traffic 

permit ip any any log 

permitted tcp 10.10.0.72(0) - 10.10.9.18(0), 1 packet
permitted udp 10.10.0.98(0) - 10.10.9.10(0), 1 packet 

I have ALOT of lines with many source and destination addresses, the IPs 
are valid for the network 

Thanks for any help 

Rick Davidson
National Systems Manager
North American Title Group
-  

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Service Agreements

2004-12-01 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello,

I seem to recall that the license code is based on the fqdn of the mail
server. Wouldn't that mean that an individual license would be required for
each server it is installed on in order to function?

I also think that the updates covered by the service agreement are for all
products anyway since there is only one codebase for all products but
individual config file for each product. That would mean that  if you had
just JM, the updates also includes the code for AV and HJ as well.

FWIW

Mike O'Brien
Platinum Coast Internet Service

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log file locking???

2004-11-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, 

It's possible its a locking issue.  What specifically is the error message 
it is returning? 

I ran into similar issue with a log rotating script I wrote to move logs 
around into WebTrends.  I was trying to rotate a log file still being 
downloaded and it would cause an issue. 

When I would encounter the error I would sleep 30 seconds and try it 
again. 

on error resume next 

If ( Err  0 ) Then
 oShell.run cmd /c sleep.exe 30, 0 , true
 Err.Clear
End If 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Matt writes: 

I'm wondering if someone familiar with the logging of IMail, Declude and 
Sniffer and scripting could enlighten me on an issue that I am having.  I 
have a script that is run every hour on my server that takes the 4 logs 
generated by these processes, moves them to a temp folder on the same 
drive, and then appends the data to a log file for each day that is 
archived on another drive. 

The problem that I am having is that the script (written in VBScript) is 
failing part way into the process about once every day or two, or about 1 
out of 40 times.  It seems to always fail after creating the temp 
directory, or after moving the IMail log into the temp directory, which 
happens to be the first two steps (the third is to move the Declude 
JunkMail log).  The only thing that I can think of is that the script is 
unable to move these files because they are being locked by the system as 
they are being updated.  Both the IMail and JunkMail logs are seeing 
between 3MB and 15MB of data per hour depending on the time of day and the 
log. 

So if someone could confirm whether or not this could be some form of a 
locking issue that prevents a VBScript move (object.MoveFile), that would 
be appreciated.  Also, if this is a locking issue, what would be the 
recommended work around for handling this?  I'm not familiar with a method 
of retrying the move until successful within VBScript, though maybe there 
is a way to detect the error condition and loop until none is found, or a 
maximum number of tries has occurred. 

Thanks, 

Matt 

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Skipping test if weight exceeds x

2004-11-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Katie, 

SKIPIFWEIGHT only works in filter files and you will need the latest version 
of Declude to use this feature.  From my experience DNS based tests and 
external tests are ran before the filter tests are ran.  Most folks use the 
SKIPIFWEIGHT test to bypass CPU consuming filter files if the message 
already has reached a certain weight. 

To the best of my knowledge, Declude will always process all tests before it 
takes an action.  So I don't there is a way to stop all processing if you 
have a hit on sniffer. 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Katie LaSalle-Lowery writes: 

I have seen recent discussions of SKIPIFWEIGHT.  The timing is perfect as I
want to change my configuration to do just that--skip all further testing
once the weight gets to 10.  Do I interpret correctly that that is the
purpose of SKIPIFWEIGHT?	 

If I missed any instruction for how to make that change I apologize.  I did
look over the recent thread but see only discussion on how negative weights
are treated.  I also examined my manual for Declude Junkmail 1.65. 

What I want to achieve is for the Message Sniffer test to run first and with
an assigned weight of 10.  If Message Sniffer gets a match I want the
message deleted without further scanning.  I want to reduce our overhead due
to scanning and logging.  If the message passes Message Sniffer but then
fails other tests I just want it deleted as soon as it reaches 10.   

So, how do I use SKIPIFWEIGHT and does Declude run the tests in the order
they appear in the default junkmail config for each domain and/or user?   Do
I need to upgrade to a newer version to achieve my goal?   

Thanks, 
Katie LaSalle-Lowery
Centric Internet Services
1410 Reserve St.
Missoula, MT 59801
Local Phone 549-3337 ext. 21
Toll Free (888)593-2776 ext. 21
Fax (406)721-3438
http://www.centric.net  

 

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by CENTRIC INTERNET SERVICES] 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Is this the correct format?

2004-11-11 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Kris, 

The syntax would be 

66.54.138.0/24 Description Of Why 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Kris McElroy writes: 

66.54.138.* Description of why 

I want to list the whole class C /24, so is the above the correct syntax in
an IPFILE? 

 

 

 

Thanks, 

Kris McElroy 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Moving mail servers

2004-11-11 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Dean, 

The best thing to do is lower your TTL well ahead of time of the move.  If 
you lower your TTL down to about 5 minutes on your records your cutover 
should not take that long for mail to cutover to your new IP.  Also, make 
sure you get your PTR records added ahead of time. 

Also you have the option of adding the new ip address as a secondary MX so 
that when the first box goes offline it should start hitting it right away.  
Than all you have to do is update and remove the old MX. 

Just make sure you lower the TTL's for any A records as well for how folks 
access the machine. 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Dean Lawrence writes: 

I am in the process of moving my Imail server to a different machine
at a different hosting facility, hence a new IP. Does anyone have any
suggestions for making this a smooth transition? I have moved Imail
many times before, so I am not worried about the setup. What I am
looking for is suggestions as to how to handle the lag time of routers
picking up the new IP. 

I host mail for a number of my clients, so there may be a period of
time where they cannot get to their mail. I would like to minimize
this. I had thought about just turning off the old server once the DNS
changes have been made so that no mail would be lost in translation,
but I had also thought about converting it to a store and forward
server so that the mail will get delivered to the new server quicker.
What do you guys think? 

Thanks, 

Dean
--
__
Dean Lawrence, CIO/Partner
Internet Data Technology
888.GET.IDT1 ext. 701 * fax: 888.438.4381
http://www.idatatech.com/
Corporate Internet Development and Marketing Specialists
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.57 released

2004-11-05 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Darin, 

If its an unsigned 4-byte wouldnt it be 4,294,967,295 tests? 

Darrell 

Darin Cox writes: 

This is the same idea I mentioned a year ago when we were all talking about combo tests in Decludeonly problem being if you use more unique tests than the numeric type supported.  Assuming the weight/bitmask number is a 4-byte unsigned int, then we have a maximum of 32 tests. 

Darin. 

- Original Message - 
From: Matt 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Friday, November 05, 2004 7:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ANN: SPAMC32 (SpamAssassin SPAMC for Declude) 0.5.57 released 

If you don't mind me expanding on the bitmask ideaSniffer users would benefit from this greatly as many spams fail multiple Sniffer tests.  This would allow us to score each result code that it returned, i.e. 

SNIFFER-GENERAL   bitmask1C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\execode.exe mycode60 
SNIFFER-EXPERIMENTALbitmask2C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\execode.exe mycode60
SNIFFER-OBFUSCATION  bitmask4C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\execode.exe mycode60
SNIFFER-IP  bitmask8C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\execode.exe mycode40
SNIFFER-CASINO   bitmask16C:\IMail\Declude\Snifferexecode.exe mycode80
... 

So if a test such as Sniffer returned a result code of 26, that would mean it hit SNIFFER-CASINO, SNIFFER-IP and SNIFFER-EXPERIMENTAL. 

That would be huge :) 

Matt 

Matt wrote: 

  Yes, I would be interested in this very much since it would greatly ease the management, testing and reporting of such tests, and I have been working on something myself that would be capable of returning both positive and negative weights and I didn't want to be running it twice to get the separation in log lines. 

  Something else that is a bit OT regarding external tests...I would be very interested in finding a way to run an external test once and return multiple result codes, that way if you for instance were testing different things that both required substantial code and extra I/O, you could make things much more efficient and also greatly simplify the management of your code.  I understand of course that you could create a set of 4 result codes to represent the combination of two hits, but it quickly becomes unwieldy as it grows exponentially.  Is there a way that you could return multiple result codes and have Declude fail multiple tests without running the test multiple times?  I'm thinking that something like a bitmask returned and then interpreted by Declude to match zero to many tests. 

  http://www.joestump.net/170933118/a-quick-bitmask-howto-for-programmers 

  Note that if this was available, I would probably prefer this over weight+ and weight- for my own needs since I don't perceive being able to do both :) 

  Thanks, 

  Matt 

 

  Markus Gufler wrote: 

Yet another update to SPAMC32 that's useful when deployed as 
a Declude 'weight'  test type. See the release notes below 
and download from the traditional /release folder.

As SpamChk is not anymore alone as external 'weight' test maybe also SPAMC32
users are interested in having 'weight+' and 'weight-'
So it would be possible to confgure two config lines one for a positive the
other for negative results. 

For example 

SPAMASSASSIN+ weight+ c:\imail\...
SPAMASSASSIN- weight- c:\imail\... 

The benefits? 

1.) It would become possible to use the results of weight tests for
combination filters.
Up to now it was not possible to assign extra points, for example if an
IP4R-test and SPAMCHK has failed.
As both tests are tecnicaly completely different the combination would be
highly accurate.
You can see this for example on http://www2.spamchk.com/public.html on the
already existing COMBO-... tests. 

2.) Creating reports would be much easier and more clear if weight tests can
be separated like showed above. 

I've suggested this some months ago to Scott. Maybe now with some additional
interested parties... 

Markus 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

   

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels

2004-11-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Mark, 

You will lose some functionality on log level MID.  I am not exactly sure 
which reports you are currently running, but if you check out 
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/support.htm it will let you know 
which log levels are required for each specific report. 

If you need any help let me know.
Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Mark E. Smith writes: 

I've always used LOGLEVEL HIGH on my systems but I'm reconsidering that
these days since our logs are running 250mb - 350mb. 

I use a number of log reports (DLAnalyizer, etc) 

If I switch to LOGLEVEL MID will I lose anything in my log reporting utils? 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels

2004-11-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Those are both great tools.  My only complaint with BareTail is I get a lot 
of flicker under TS.  However, their older wintail has no flicker... 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Darin Cox writes: 

Try BareTail and BareGrep instead, from http://www.baremetalsoft.com/ 

Great for monitoring logs in real-time as well. 

Darin. 

- Original Message - 
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels 

We have 4 inbound equal MX servers each with 250-350 per day so we're about
the same in net-net load.
I started writing a log parsing program that will consolidate the logs and
insert them into a central SQL database.
That way I'll be able to do a query on a message and debug much easier. 

The problem right now is loading a 350mb (let alone 1.6GB) file with
notepad. :) 


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn \ WCNet
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels 

My Declude logs at HIGH range between 1.2 and 1.6 GIGABYTES.
The log for
11/3 is 1,701,795 KB. 

- Original Message -
From: Mark E. Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 9:03 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] LOG Levels 

 I've always used LOGLEVEL HIGH on my systems but I'm
reconsidering that
 these days since our logs are running 250mb - 350mb.

 I use a number of log reports (DLAnalyizer, etc)

 If I switch to LOGLEVEL MID will I lose anything in my log reporting
utils?


 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam

2004-11-01 Thread i360 Support



Thanks,,,

H.



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 3:46 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink 
  Porn Spam
  i360 Support wrote:
  




I am still getting a ton of porn spam from 
Earthlink.
I report it but it does not help 
much.

Any suggestions on how to stop this 
crap?
Attached is the filter that I 
  use to kill this stuff. Last I checked, there were two different 
  spammers that were cracking AUTH to get this stuff through, and their patterns 
  don't seem to have changed, although they probably will and/or more will 
  come.Matt-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=
  
  

  # HACKEDEARTHLINK v1.1.0REVDNS END NOTCONTAINS 
  .earthlink.netMAILFROM END CONTAINS earthlinkMAILFROM END CONTAINS 
  mindspringREMOTEIP 2 CONTAINS .SUBJECT 10 CONTAINS 
  =?windows-1251?b?HEADERS 15 CONTAINS User-Agent: aolTESTSFAILED 2 
  CONTAINS SNIFFER-TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS FOREIGNTESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS 
  BADHEADERSTESTSFAILED 2 CONTAINS (ALL)TESTSFAILED -2 CONTAINS 
  (LAST)TESTSFAILED 2 CONTAINS SPAMCOP(ALL)TESTSFAILED 2 CONTAINS 
  XBL(ALL)TESTSFAILED 1 CONTAINS DSBL(ALL)


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Little confused by these headers

2004-10-14 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
Well this is silly.  I guess it's not really a forged header.  I was
scanning mails that were tagged as spam and passed on, and the original of
this was going to a stepindustries.net account.  Only this specific user
is having that mail all forwarded to an AOL account.  Within AOL, she's
marking the mail as spam.

Maybe it's finally time I start holding or blocking spam as opposed to
just tagging it and passing it on.  Haven't had a false-positive in over 2
weeks.


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Client TOS Notifications from AOL

2004-10-06 Thread support
Essentially someone received an email in their AOL acount and marked it as 
SPAM.   Since you setup a feedback loop with AOL they will now send you 
every instance of an email that was reported as SPAM by one of their 
members. 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Don Schreiner writes: 

Declude Folks, 

I need some help figuring out why we are receiving e-mails from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject Line: Client TOS Notification, and the Sent To address
is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure if these are coming back to
me in our abuse or postmaster account? There is nothing in the body of the
e-mail, only an attachment of e-mail apparently getting rejected. Anyone
else seeing these? The client we host forwards his e-mail automatically to
his AOL account. For example, below is the header of an e-mail that was
attached whereas a spam e-amail appears to have been sent to our client
(lamphier.com) hosted on our IMail server (sneezy.xerocom.net -
vacant.spiderhost.com is router) which was forwarded to his AOL account.
Unfortunately it did not weight enough under our Declude config, nor Sniffer
to get held as Spam. Any ideas what AOL is doing or what I should do to
eliminate these most appreciated. Worried about getting on the wrong side of
AOL. Thanks. 

-Don 

Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from  rly-xa05.mx.aol.com (rly-xa05.mail.aol.com [172.20.64.41])
by air-xa03.mail.aol.com (v101_r1.4) with ESMTP id MAILINXA31-7341621d0d322;
Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:03:36 -0400
Received: from  SNEEZY.XEROCOM.NET (vacant.spiderhost.com [65.57.241.197])
by rly-xa05.mx.aol.com (v101_r1.5) with ESMTP id
MAILRELAYINXA55-7341621d0d322; Tue, 05 Oct 2004 00:03:25 -0400
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by lamphier.com
  (SMTP32) id A1BF42BA100B8F0C3; Mon,  4 Oct 2004 23:58:48
Received: from pelxavirus3.terra.com.pe [200.48.36.5] by SNEEZY.XEROCOM.NET
with ESMTP
  (SMTPD32-8.12) id ABF42BA100B8; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 23:58:44 -0400
Received: from anamaria (unknown [200.106.79.108])
 by pelxavirus3.terra.com.pe (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295EDB7CA4;
 Mon,  4 Oct 2004 23:07:07 -0500 (PET)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Undisclosed Recipients
From: Anni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Proposal
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 23:03:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain pelxavirus3.terra.com.pe has no MX or A
records [0301].
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT1-9: Total weight between 1 and 9.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [200.48.36.5]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D1bf42ba100b8f0c3.SMD
X-Note: CompBiz scanned with Declude JunkMail.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, HELOBOGUS, WEIGHT1-9 [7].
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from smtp7.terra.com.pe ([200.48.36.5]).
X-Sender: Sender of E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: RevDNS Remote Server smtp7.terra.com.pe ([200.48.36.5]).
X-AOL-IP: 65.57.241.197
X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) 

Dear Customer,
=20
Be the very first listing in the top search engines immediately.
=20
Our company will now place any business with a qualified website
permanently=
 at the top of the major search engines guaranteed never to move.  This
prom=
otion includes unlimited traffic and is not going to last long.  If you
are=20=
interested in being guaranteed first position in the top search engines at
a=
 promotional fee, please contact us promptly to find out if you qualify
via=20=
email at   [EMAIL PROTECTED]   AND INCLUDE THE URL(s) YOUR ARE INTERESTED
I=
N PLACING.  This is not pay per click.=20 

The following are examples on Yahoo!, MSN and Alta Vista:
=20
Company:  Oahu Dive Center
URL:   http://oahudivecenter.com
keyword:   oahu scuba diving
=20
Company:  California Moves.com
URL:   http://steph.cbsocal.com
keyword:   find a home southern california
=20
Sincerely,
=20
IGN
The Search Engine Promotional Consultants 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live

2004-10-05 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
 PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 12:07 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live




Unfortunately spamdomains is a test that has a lot of false positives and
there is not real solid list of spamdomains.  Because of that we have to
weight spamdomains low, so I could never say that users would not see such
an email because of spam domains alone.  On the other hand I can give a very
high weight to urls contained in the body of an email and will have almost
no false positives.  Just my thoughts on the matter.

Chuck Schick
Warp 8, Inc.
(303)-421-5140
www.warp8.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Geiser
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 9:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live


Whether I classify them as spam or not, I don't post every spam that I
receive to this list.

My point is that if you are blocking phish based on individual URLs I think
you are not doing it in the most efficient way.  Simply adding...

@ameritrade.com.ameritrade.com
@citi.com.citibank.com
@citibank.com.citibank.com
@ebay.com.ebay.com
@fleet.com.fleet.com
.gs.com
@paypal.com  .paypal.com
@suntrust.com.suntrust.com
@visa.com.visa.com
@wellsfargo.com.wellsfargo.com

to the text file which maps to my Spamdomains test keeps all of the phish
away from my users since none of these messages every originate from the
proper domains.

Dan

- Original Message -
From: Bill Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live


 Where else would you suggest they be posted, after all, phishing
 e-mail
are
 spam in my book.  However, with that said, more and more virus vendors
 are starting to add phishing e-mail recognition to their virus
 definitions. Both uvscan (NAI/McAfee) and the latest release
 candidates for ClamAV support phishing e-mail detection.

 Bill
 - Original Message -
 From: Dan Geiser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 4:22 AM
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live


 Can I ask why you guys post these to the Declude JunkMail discussion
 list?  It doesn't seem to have anything to do with the subject matter
 of this list.

 - Original Message -
 From: Kami Razvan mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 6:56 AM
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Citibank - phishing- still live

 Hi;
 the following is another phishing attempt- the site still live.

 http://211.158.34.250/citifi/ http://211.158.34.250/citifi/

 Regards,
 Kami


  Email

 Subject: [37~]Dear customer your details have been compromised
 MIME-Version: 1.0 (produced by annunciatemarginalia 8.2)
 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;  boundary=--938071008627732911
 X-RBL-Warning: IPNOTINMX:
 X-RBL-Warning: NOLEGITCONTENT: No content unique to legitimate E-mail
 detected.
 X-RBL-Warning: CMDSPACE: Space found in RCPT TO: command.
 X-RBL-Warning: NJABL-DYNA: Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by
 NJABL dynablock - http://njabl.org/dynablock.html
 http://njabl.org/dynablock.html 
 X-RBL-Warning: NJABL-DUL: This E-mail came from 12.107.246.11, a
 potential spam source listed in NJABL-DUL.
 X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 X-RBL-Warning: SORBS-DUL: Dynamic IP Address See:
 http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?12.107.246.11
 http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?12.107.246.11 
 X-RBL-Warning: IPLINKED: Message failed IPLINKED test (line 198,
 weight
 13)
 X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [12.107.246.11]
 X-Declude-Spoolname: D26691b0502409fba.SMD
 X-Note:
 ==
 X-Note: Spam Score: 37 [BLOCKED ON 20+  DELETED ON 40+]
 X-Note: Scan Time: 00:43:47 on 05 Oct 2004
 X-Note: Spool File: D26691b0502409fba.SMD
 X-Note: Server Name: dialup-12-107-246-11.dtccom.net
 X-Note: SMTP Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 X-Note: Reverse DNS  IP: dialup-12-107-246-11.dtccom.net
 [12.107.246.11]
 X-Note: Country Chain: UNITED STATES-destination


 938071008627732911
 Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=iso-2059-6
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 Content-Description: nicholson salmonberry biblical

 Dear Customer:

 Recently there have been a large number of cyber attacks pointing our
 data= base servers. In order to safeguard your account, we require you
 to sign o=
 n immediately.

 This personal check is requested of you as a precautionary measure and
 to = ensure yourselves that everything is normal with your balance and
 personal=
  information.

 This process is mandatory, and if you did not sign on within the
 nearest t= ime your account may be subject to temporary

[Declude.JunkMail] annoying spammer

2004-10-03 Thread i360 Support



We have been 
swamped with spam from United Email Marketing.Below is a list of IP 
addresses and domains used to send the crap.Sniffer does not catch them 
and I can't stop them.Does anyone have a solution on how to get rid of 
them?207.43.11.191207.43.11.192207.43.12.187205.241.69.176205.241.69.175205.241.71.182205.241.72.177205.241.73.187205.241.73.168205.241.68.178205.241.75.170205.241.75.176207.43.11.191207.43.11.192207.43.9.183207.43.8.192207.43.6.175207.43.4.186205.241.76.183205.241.77.182205.241.77.172205.241.81.186205.241.82.184204.95.128.193204.95.129.174uniecommerce.com=20unpitch.comunpromotion.comunplugging.netunmtransactor.comunmpr.comunmplugger.comunnotice.com=20unmmarketer.comunitrucking.comunipurchaser.comuniebuying.comuntrucking.comuntrucker.comuntrafficker.com=20unseller.comuemrbuying.com=20uemrcommerce.comuemrenterprise.comumrmailclient.comumrexchanger.com- 
Original Message -=20From: Mortgage Connectors=20To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 3:12 AMSubject: SPAM: Make the Lenders 
Compete Over You=20Your energies are just 
mismatched these days. You will gain confidence =in your abilities if you 
say no to those wanting you to do for them =instead of for yourself. Your 
energies are just mismatched these days. =Who knew that romance could be so 
fun? Buy flowers. Write poetry. Order =dessert.You will attract a 
potential partner. Play your cards right. The big =picture is as crucial as 
the small one. Consult an expert for help. =Nothing will be as it appears. 
Be careful.=20Your creative talent must be implemented in your work if 
you want to =reach a higher level. What you get now is what you wanted all 
along. =Your energies are just mismatched these days. You will attract a 
=potential partner. Play your cards right.You find pleasure wherever 
you look -- and maybe in a few surprising =places as well. You are in a very 
industrious and creative cycle that =will bring you profits and 
satisfaction. Avoid opposition for a little =while. As the song says Later 
on you can decide whether this is the =beginning of a permanent 
change.aGVpbWlyQHRyb2xsd2ViLmNvbQ=3D=3D=20=2010.1.1.241826112252 
--=_NextPart_000_06EA_01C4A99D.138B9190Content-Type: 
text/html;charset="iso-8859-1"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
quoted-printable!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 
Transitional//EN"HTMLHEADMETA 
http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; 
=charset=3Diso-8859-1"META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2180" 
name=3DGENERATORSTYLE/STYLE/HEADBODY 
bgColor=3D#ffDIVFONT face=3DArial size=3D2We have 
been swamped with spam from =United 
Email=20Marketing./FONT/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial size=3D2Below is a list of IP addresses and =domains used 
to=20send the crap./FONT/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial size=3D2Sniffer does not catch them and I can't 
=stop=20them./FONT/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial size=3D2Does anyone have a solution on how to =get rid 
of=20them?/FONT/DIVDIVFONT face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial=20size=3D2207.43.11.191BR207.43.11.192BR207.43.12.187BR205.241.69.17=6BR205.241.69.175BR205.241.71.182BR205.241.72.177BR205.241.73.187=BR205.241.73.168BR205.241.68.178BR205.241.75.170BR205.241.75.176=BR207.43.11.191BR207.43.11.192BR207.43.9.183BR207.43.8.192BR207.=43.6.175BR207.43.4.186BR205.241.76.183BR205.241.77.182BR205.241.7=7.172BR205.241.81.186BR205.241.82.184BR204.95.128.193BR204.95.129=.174/FONT/DIVDIVnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVnbsp;/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2uniecommerce.com=20BRunpitch.comBRunpromotion.comBRunplugging.netBRunmtransactor.com=BRunmpr.comBRunmplugger.comBRunnotice.com=20BRunmmarketer.comBRunitrucking.comBRunipurchaser.comBRuniebuying.=comBRuntrucking.comBRuntrucker.comBRuntrafficker.com=20BRunseller.comBRuemrbuying.com=20BRuemrcommerce.comBRuemrenterprise.comBRumrmailclient.comBRumrexc=hanger.com/FONT/DIVDIVFONT 
face=3DArial 
size=3D2/FONTnbsp;/DIVDIVnbsp;/DIVDIV 
style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"- Original Message -=20DIV 
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; font-color: black"BFrom:/B 
A=20[EMAIL PROTECTED]href="">mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"Mortgage Connectors/A 
=/DIVDIVBTo:/B A [EMAIL PROTECTED]href="">mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A 
/DIVDIVBSent:/B Monday, October 04, 2004 
3:12 AM/DIVDIVBSubject:/B SPAM: Make the 
Lenders Compete Over 
You/DIV/DIVDIVBR/DIVA=20href="">http://844.umrexchanger.com/106519/[EMAIL PROTECTED].=com"IMG=20src="">http://6485.umrexchanger.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 
=border=3D0/A=20BRBRBRBRBRBRYour 
energies are just mismatched these days. =You will=20gain confidence in 
your abilities if you say no to those wanting you to =do for="">them 
instead of for yourself. Your energies are just mismatched these =days. 
Who=20knew that romance could be so fun? Buy flowers. Write poetry. 

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude 1.80

2004-09-27 Thread support
Scott, 

Also from the doc's it appears as if the bounce action has changed back to 
bounce from bounceonlyifyoumust.  Is this correct or an error in the doc's? 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

R. Scott Perry writes: 


Looks to me like they have finally locked up the executables and you will 
need an account to access such things in the future (i.e. service 
agreement).  There is a link on the home page to get the new download.
Correct. 

The new owners wisely felt that this would be a good idea, as it will help 
ensure that we have contact information for our current customers (which 
is useful for cases such as when we receive abuse complaints regarding our 
customers, or if there is a serious problem they need to be aware of), and 
will help ensure that people are licensed properly (quite a few people 
truly *thought* that they had a valid Service Agreement, and would have 
gladly purchased one if they had realized they did not, and were unaware 
that they were violating our licensing agreement by running a version they 
were not entitled to). 

Looks to me like it's pretty much the same app, just packaged differently 
and limited in access.
Correct.  It's pretty much the same 1.80 release that people would have 
expected in the past (lots of changes since the last release, but few 
changes since the last interim), except with an install program and 
.pdf/.doc documentation files. 

I'm very thankful that they have maintained a wizzard-less install and 
configs.
:) 

There should also be a .ZIP file that people can download (if it is not 
yet available) with just the files that are needed, for people who don't 
want to run the install program. 

   -Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Help, I have been blacklisted

2004-09-13 Thread i360 Support
- Original Message - 
From: Bud Durland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Fw: Help, I have been blacklisted


Richard Farris wrote:
I have been delisted from SPAMCOP...whew...but I still am in the red with
these guys:
PSBL
JAMMDNSBL
BLARSBL
 

I remember right, once you are on BLARS, you don't ever get off... 
something about paying him exorbitant amount of money to see if it's 
worth his time to remove you.   I suspect many responsible mail admins 
don't use BLARSBL because of that.


BLARSBL sounds more like a blackmail list then a blacklist.
I read about him before and it was not in his favor.
We do not use it.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests not working right?

2004-09-12 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
in my GLOBAL file, the tests are defines as follows:
 
SPFPASSspfpassx-50
SPFFAILspffailx8 0

In $default$
SPFPASS warn
SPFFAIL warn

My problem is, while I do get several successful pass results, I have yet
to get a fail result.  How exactly is this test carried out?  Is it checking
for the validity of the SPF record, and if one does not exist, the test is
skipped?  Or should a mail fail if either the record is inaccurate OR if the
record does not exist?  Or do I have something configured wrong?  From
scanning the archives I believe that I do have the tests configured
properly.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests not working right?

2004-09-12 Thread Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support
Yes, I have noticed this already. I've only been using Declude (or any spam
filter for that matter) for a week or so now.  Still working on getting my
weights set properly so-as to block more spam yet prevent false-positives.
Thanks for then tip on unknown.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin Cox
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests not working right?

Syntax looks correct.  Fail looks at the SPF record for the domain being
checked and if it says mail should not be sent from that domains from the
mail server in question, then the test will fail.  For the case where the
domain does not have an SPF record, the test would return Unknown.  If you
want to show that result you can add

SPFUNKNOWNspfunknownx0 0

SPFUNKNOWNWARN

Also note that giving much, or perhaps any, weight to SPF PASS may not be a
good idea as some spammers have added SPF records.

Darin.


- Original Message -
From: Matthew Hiltner: oliveJar Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 2:42 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF tests not working right?


in my GLOBAL file, the tests are defines as follows:

SPFPASSspfpassx-50
SPFFAILspffailx8 0

In $default$
SPFPASS warn
SPFFAIL warn

My problem is, while I do get several successful pass results, I have yet
to get a fail result.  How exactly is this test carried out?  Is it checking
for the validity of the SPF record, and if one does not exist, the test is
skipped?  Or should a mail fail if either the record is inaccurate OR if the
record does not exist?  Or do I have something configured wrong?  From
scanning the archives I believe that I do have the tests configured
properly.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Test needed along with sniffer

2004-09-08 Thread support
Harry, 

We have a utility to let you know how well a specific test does in our log 
parser (DLAnalyzer).  The test is called the Test Breakdown Summary 
Report.  Essentially you can pick a certain test(s) and see which other 
tests fail along with them.  This report has helped us eliminate tests that 
performed the same as other tests. 

For example you can configure the report to summarize messages that failed 
Sniffer.  It will than show you what other tests failed on messages that 
also failed Sniffer.  You can get more granular by even excluding tests.  
For example: Show me which tests were triggered in conjunction with Sniffer, 
but did not fail XBL. 

Below is the link for a sample output from this report.
http://www.invariantsystems.com/dlanalyzer/testsamples/TestSummaryBreakdownR 
eport.html 

In the above report you can see that out of all messages that failed the 
weight30 test 85% of them also failed SPAMCOP and 63% failed XBL.. 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Harry Vanderzand writes: 

I am testing sniffer right now and wonder if I need to run all the other
tests along side it. 

I am trying to reduce my daily workload of analyzing the spamtrap and hope
that sniffer and surbl will do this. 

Do I even need surbl? 

Any advice in this matter would be greatly appreciated. 

Thanks in advance  

Harry Vanderzand 
inTown Internet  Computer Services  

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hitting the CPU Wall

2004-09-01 Thread support
Do any of these servers provide pop/imap/webmail services.  We have a couple 
identical servers, but the ones that provide ancillary services tend to 
consume more CPU. 

For your type of volume it should be rare to see 25+ declude processes 
running at one time.  From my experience when I have seen this it always 
pointed to a flaky or malfunctioning DNS server.  The other caveat is 
depending on how many and the type of body filters you have could cause 
this. 

Something does seem wrong if your driving the cpu at 100% with a message 
volume of 2000 messages per hour with that type of box.   Again, depending 
on your configuration of Declude this type of performance could be normal.. 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Darrell 



Goran Jovanovic writes: 

Hi, 

I know that the answer to this question is a big it depends but I am
trying to get a feel if I have the server mostly configured correctly or
am I missing things. 

I have a 1.4 GHz Celeron CPU with 512MB RAM and a RAID 1 hard drive
system. We are pushing the CPU to 100% and close to 100% a lot of the
time during core business hours. Declude log files report that we are
processing 12 to 15 thousand messages a day. Based on a quick script I
created I am seeing some hours where we are dealing with 2000 messages
in that hour. I have also looked at Task Manager and at times I see 20
to 25 Declude processes running concurrently. 

I have a number of BODY search filters that I am skipping if a bypass
filter was triggered (for things like PDF attachments etc). I also have
two AV scanners F-Prot and McAfee. 

So the question is: With this setup should I be able to a lot more
messages per hour/day or am I lucky that I am doing as many as I am. 

I would appreciate any thoughts/speculation etc 

Thanx 

 
 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Information

2004-08-25 Thread support
If your looking for more of a histogram of the number of messgaes processed 
we have MRTG scripts that interface with Imail/Declude to provide you this 
information.  This may or may not be what your looking for... 

Darrell 

Goran Jovanovic writes: 

Darrell 

I was hoping for more of a histogram of the number of messages processed
by hour or half hour. My first thought would be to just get info on
simply messages by hour and then maybe if I see a spike I could rerun it
to see who was sending/receiving during that time. 

Thanx
 
 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe 

 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darrell ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 10:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Information 

Goran, 

You can grep your logs out and use DLAnalyzer for this. 

For example:
grep -i  8/13/2004 14: dec0813.log  newlogfile.txt 

Than rename the log file to dec0813.log and than process.. 

Darrell 


--
--

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude
And
Imail.
IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log
Parsers. 

- Original Message -
From: Goran Jovanovic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Log Information 

Hi, 

Is there a log file analyzer that will report on messages received by
hour. I am interested in knowing how many e-mails came in between 3
and
4 and then between 4 and 5 etc. 

Thanx 

 Goran Jovanovic
 The LAN Shoppe 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] External Test for Subject is Upper Case

2004-08-24 Thread support
I would be curious to hear on this as well.  It's my understanding that the 
non-english test in declude should catch this (chinese in the subject)?  Why 
the need for an external test? 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Keith Johnson writes: 

Scott Fisher,
I heard you mention once that you made a filter to catch Chinese characters in the subject, we have a few customers that get nailed by these often.  Was wondering if you could share your thoughts.   Thanks,
 
Keith  

	-Original Message- 
	From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Scott Fisher 
	Sent: Tue 8/24/2004 12:12 AM 
	To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] External Test for Subject is Upper Case
	
	 

	I've made an external test to test if the Subject is all upper case (or punctuation).
	If anyone is interested, let me know and I'll e-mail you a copy.
	---
	[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
	
	---
	This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
	unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
	type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
	at http://www.mail-archive.com.
	 


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Attachment sizes

2004-08-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
David, 

We limit around 10MB.  It has worked well.  That not to say several folks 
havent tried to email 50+MB files.. 

Darrell 


Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

David Fletcher writes: 

We have never set message size limits on our servers.  Now it is
becoming an issue. 

Is there any sort of standard for maximum message sizes?  This is for
hosted customers and I'd like to be reasonable, but I don't think
allowing them to receive 18meg + messages is necessary.  (I just shook
my head when I saw this one after hearing the question: Why is my
Outlook locking up?) 

What limits do you all use? 

Thanks for the input. 

David Fletcher
InfoTech International, LLC.
(904)338-9234
--
Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General
Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] There's no doom like MyDoom

2004-08-03 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
It is using yahoo to query for more email addresses.  Here is Mcafee's write 
up. 

http://vil.nai.com/vil/content/v_127175.htm 

Darrell

Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And 
Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, MRTG Integration, and Log 
Parsers. 

Colbeck, Andrew writes: 

Another week, another variant. 

http://isc.sans.org/ 

Judging from possible strings in the message body and subject, this virus
uses a password protected zip (or pretends to), and pretends to be about
security, possibly faking your own domain name, just like last week. 

I don't know what it's trying to do to at Yahoo!... 

Andrew 8)
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Repost of 7/30

2004-08-02 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all,

I need some other (better) minds with this question.

I host a domain (with email) that I have whitelisted both to  from in the
global.cfg file.

The entries are:

WHITELIST TODOMAIN @domain.com
WHITELIST FROM @domain.com

I also have an IPBlacklist test as follows:

IPBlackList ipfile  D:\IMail\Declude\IPBlackList.txt x 5 0

The entry in the $default$.junkmail file is:

IPBlackList WARN

So here is the question.

If the sender is using the MS Outlook mail client to send email via a DSL
line whose IP happens to be listed in the IPBlackList file, will his email
be stopped by the IPBlacklist test even though it is Whitelisted in the
Global.cfg?

I ran a test again to see if the IPBlacklist test was really working by
reducing the weighting to 0 and indeed, it works. By using the weight of 5
in addition to other tests we use, I can also see where email will exceed
our threshold for deletion.

I seem to think that the WHITELIST commands will allow the mail to go thru
without further tests (regardless of type) being performed - hence, the
reason for WHITELISTING.

TIA for your comments.

Mike O'Brien

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Repost of 7/30

2004-08-02 Thread Junkmail Support
Thanks Scott,

I was second-guessing my understanding of the Whitelist entry and my
IPBlacklist test.

Mike
- Original Message - 
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Repost of 7/30



 I host a domain (with email) that I have whitelisted both to  from in
the
 global.cfg file.
 ...
 
 If the sender is using the MS Outlook mail client to send email via a DSL
 line whose IP happens to be listed in the IPBlackList file, will his
email
 be stopped by the IPBlacklist test even though it is Whitelisted in the
 Global.cfg?

 No.  A whitelist forces E-mail to pass all anti-spam tests (despite what
 Ipswitch tried convincing people with the original v8 releases).  Since
the
 E-mail has an @example.com return address, and you have WHITELIST FROM
 @example.com, the E-mail will pass all the spam tests, and be delivered
as
 if Declude JunkMail was not running.

 There *are* some rare exceptions, but they are ones that you would know
 about (such as the bypasswhitelist option).

 I seem to think that the WHITELIST commands will allow the mail to go
thru
 without further tests (regardless of type) being performed - hence, the
 reason for WHITELISTING.

 Correct.

 However, you need to make sure that the E-mail address in the
 X-Declude-Sender: header matches the domain in the WHITELIST FROM  line
 in the global.cfg file.  If the user tries sending E-mail as
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], for example, their E-mail won't get whitelisted.

 -Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers
 since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in mailserver
 vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]



---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting IPBlacklist Question

2004-07-30 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all,

I need some other (better) minds with this question.

I host a domain (with email) that I have whitelisted both to  from in the
global.cfg file.

The entries are:

WHITELIST TODOMAIN @domain.com
WHITELIST FROM @domain.com

I also have an IPBlacklist test as follows:

IPBlackList ipfile  D:\IMail\Declude\IPBlackList.txt x 5 0

The entry in the $default$.junkmail file is:

IPBlackList WARN

So here is the question.

If the sender is using the MS Outlook mail client to send email via a DSL
line whose IP happens to be listed in the IPBlackList file, will his email
be stopped by the IPBlacklist test even though it is Whitelisted in the
Global.cfg?

I ran a test again to see if the IPBlacklist test was really working by
reducing the weighting to 0 and indeed, it works. By using the weight of 5
in addition to other tests we use, I can also see where email will exceed
our threshold for deletion.

I seem to think that the WHITELIST commands will allow the mail to go thru
without further tests (regardless of type) being performed - hence, the
reason for WHITELISTING.

TIA for your comments.

Mike O'Brien

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Message header review

2004-07-22 Thread i360 Support



Can someone help me with the header of this 
message.

I think this came from earthlink.net mail 
server.
According to earthlink abuse they can't do anything 
about this type of spam since it did not originate from their 
network.

We get porn spam from this segement all the 
time.




Received: from asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net 
[207.217.120.149] by deepspace.i360.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.15) id 
A94339680150; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 10:12:03 -0500Received: from 
68-235-252-102.atlsfl.adelphia.net ([68.235.252.102])by 
asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34)id 
1BnfBN-00062N-F4; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:08:32 -0700Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
"=?windows-1251?B?Y2FtZWxsaWE=?=" [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: 
"=?windows-1251?B?Y2FtZWxsaWE=?=" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: SPAM: 
=?windows-1251?B?QnJpZGdldCBtb25yb2Ugc3Vja2luZyBhIGhhcmQgY29jayB2ZXJ5IGRlZXA=?=Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:56:07 -0400MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: 
text/html;charset="windows-1251"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
7bitX-Priority: 3X-MSMail-Priority: NormalX-Mailer: Microsoft 
Outlook Express 6.00.2600.X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2600.X-ELNK-Trace: 
006cdaaeaf6f69a98241270f52c7d65b7e972de0d01da9401ceba94723fb6a47959954e32e1a9354350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9cX-Originating-IP: 
68.235.252.102X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: "Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]"X-RBL-Warning: 
NOPOSTMASTER: "Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]"X-RBL-Warning: 
BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client 
[840a].X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[207.217.120.149]X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for 
spam.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, BADHEADERS, WEIGHT10 
[11]X-Note: This E-mail was sent from asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net 
([207.217.120.149]).X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: 
UX-UIDL: 384479918


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message header review

2004-07-22 Thread i360 Support



I have forwarded several spam emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but the only response 
I get back is that the email did not originate from their network.

Its really annoying that they don't give a 
shit.

I would have blocked them if it had not been for 
one of my clients needing email from that server (they have a client that hosts 
with earthlink).

Thanks to all for the responses.

Heimir



  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 4:07 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Message 
  header review
  Earthlink has for some reason been forwarding spam through this 
  server for some time. I'm not sure what the setup is, but it's a 
  legitimate Earthlink server and the E-mail originates from a spam 
  zombie.I have thought about IPBYPASS'ing this server in order to 
  capture the real source, but I have yet to confirm if this server is just used 
  for forwarding or what the case may be. It could be that this is an open 
  relay, a forwarding server, or a full fledged mail server. I am guessing 
  the first.Matti360 Support wrote:
  



Can someone help me with the header of this 
message.

I think this came from earthlink.net mail 
server.
According to earthlink abuse they can't do 
anything about this type of spam since it did not originate from their 
network.

We get porn spam from this segement all the 
time.




Received: from 
asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.120.149] by deepspace.i360.net 
with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.15) id A94339680150; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 
10:12:03 -0500Received: from 68-235-252-102.atlsfl.adelphia.net 
([68.235.252.102])by asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp 
(Exim 4.34)id 1BnfBN-00062N-F4; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:08:32 
-0700Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
"=?windows-1251?B?Y2FtZWxsaWE=?=" [EMAIL PROTECTED]From: 
"=?windows-1251?B?Y2FtZWxsaWE=?=" [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
SPAM: 
=?windows-1251?B?QnJpZGdldCBtb25yb2Ugc3Vja2luZyBhIGhhcmQgY29jayB2ZXJ5IGRlZXA=?=Date: 
Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:56:07 -0400MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: 
text/html;charset="windows-1251"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 
7bitX-Priority: 3X-MSMail-Priority: NormalX-Mailer: Microsoft 
Outlook Express 6.00.2600.X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE 
V6.00.2600.X-ELNK-Trace: 
006cdaaeaf6f69a98241270f52c7d65b7e972de0d01da9401ceba94723fb6a47959954e32e1a9354350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9cX-Originating-IP: 
68.235.252.102X-RBL-Warning: NOABUSE: "Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]"X-RBL-Warning: 
NOPOSTMASTER: "Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]"X-RBL-Warning: 
BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client 
[840a].X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[207.217.120.149]X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for 
spam.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: NOABUSE, NOPOSTMASTER, BADHEADERS, WEIGHT10 
[11]X-Note: This E-mail was sent from asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net 
([207.217.120.149]).X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: 
UX-UIDL: 384479918-- 
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=


[Declude.JunkMail] MTLDB Uninstall

2004-07-09 Thread Junkmail Support
Hello all,

The test seems to be stable on our system.

However, I looked around and there are a couple of DLLs installed on
C:\ProgramFiles\ComputerHorizons\MTLDB. One seems to indicate that it is
cyphering or creating/using a secure token of some purpose.

In scanning the regisrty, I also notice that the connection for the
registration utilizes the typical https:// .

I also looked in the Control Panel Add/Remove Programs and there is no entry
for the MTLDB program that was installed.

I looked for an uninstall method and couldn't find anything.

Did I miss something or is it my imagination that the MTLDB test code or
registry entries must be manually removed?

I know it's easy to comment out the test (or delete it) in the Global.cfg
file. What about the rest of it and the unregistration of the dlls.?


TIA

Mike O'Brien

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] DLAnalyzer 3.0 Released (New Free Version Available)

2004-06-30 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
We are pleased to announce that DLAnalyzer 3.0 is now available.  With 
version 3.0 we are introducing a Lite version that is FREE. 

To download DLAnalyzer 3.0, please visit:
http://www.invariantsystems.com/ 

New Features In DLAnalyzer 3.0
* Last Action Summary Report
* Test Breakdown Summary Report
* Weight Range Summary Report
* IP Summary Report
* Easily Work With Multiple Configurations with the -c Command Line 
Parameter
* Ability To Exclude Tests In The Overall Server Test Summary
* Domain Summary - Last Action Filter
* Domain Summary - Weight Range Filter
* Domain Summary - Zero Message Domain Suppression
* Customized Advanced Report Output (HTML  TEXT)
* Advanced Report - Last Action Filter
* Advanced Report - Weight Range Filter
* SMTP Auth Support
* SMTP Multiple To: Addresses
* SMTP BCC: Addresses
* SMTP CC: Addresses
* GUI Configuration Utility Supports Multiple Configuration Files
* Plus Many More... 

If you have any questions let us know.
Darrell 

-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and 
Imail. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Spam sent to list

2004-06-29 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
Title: Message



I was 
wondering if someone was posting this item to the list or if my e-mail address 
was harvest from somewhere.



Isaias HernandezTC 
Online InternetSupport979-775-6239[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Received: from 
declude.com [68.162.218.198] by mail.tconline.net with ESMTP 
(SMTPD32-7.15) id A3476F6F00C6; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:34:31 -0500Received: 
from pa198.miejsce-piastowe.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.99.175.198] by 
mail.declude.com (SMTPD32-8.05) id A2713530256; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 
23:30:57 -0400X-Message-Info: 
315jiTpiaLUO037Vdjitu5nmAEwdWCW857XHZ9feDvejY0Received: from dns014yahoo.com 
([24.117.232.112]) by lp52-nks49.yahoo.com with Microsoft 
SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6824); Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:24:57 +0100Received: 
from yahoo.com [127.0.0.1] by dnsyahoo.com 
(SMTPD32-7.12 ) id AWW909SH6; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:27:57 
+0100Subject: [Declude.Virus] SPAMWT40:Attn:Urgent Sales Verification!Act 
now!From: AdminTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Message-Id: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Content-Type: 
multipart/alternative;boundary="--105305717518494121"X-RBL-Warning: 
BLITZEDALL: "open proxy - see http://opm.blitzed.org/?ip=217.99.175.198"X-RBL-Warning: 
DSBL: "http://dsbl.org/listing?ip=217.99.175.198"X-RBL-Warning: 
DSBLALL: "http://dsbl.org/listing?ip=217.99.175.198"X-RBL-Warning: 
FIVETENSRC: 112.232.117.24.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com.X-RBL-Warning: 
MAILDEFLECTOR: "Mail from 217.99.175.198 refused by the postmaster at this 
domain. Please contact the postmaster for help. You may also link to 
http://www.maildeflector.net/whywasirefused.php 
for help"X-RBL-Warning: SORBS-HTTP: "HTTP Proxy See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=217.99.175.198"X-RBL-Warning: 
SORBS-SOCKS: "HTTP Proxy See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/cgi-bin/lookup?IP=217.99.175.198"X-RBL-Warning: 
SPAMCOP: "Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?217.99.175.198"X-RBL-Warning: 
BADHEADERS: This E-mail was sent from a broken mail client 
[a020010d].X-RBL-Warning: SNIFFER: Message failed SNIFFER: 
50.X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCHK: Message failed SPAMCHK: 15.X-RBL-Warning: 
ROUTING: This E-mail was routed in a poor manner consistent with spam 
[a020010d].X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 58 reaches or exceeds the 
limit of 10.X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT20: Weight of 58 reaches or exceeds the 
limit of 20.X-Note: This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (www.declude.com)X-NRecips: 
4X-Reverse-IP: pa198.miejsce-piastowe.sdi.tpnet.plX-Weight: 58 
(BLITZEDALL, DSBL, DSBLALL, FIVETENSRC, MAILDEFLECTOR, NJABLPROXIES, SORBS-HTTP, 
SORBS-SOCKS, SPAMCOP, SPFUNKNOWN, BADHEADERS, HEUR4, SNIFFER, SPAMCHK, ROUTING, 
IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, EXPER, CMDSPACE, WEIGHT10, WEIGHT20, 
WEIGHT40)X-Country-Chain: UNITED 
STATES-POLAND-destination.X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[217.99.175.198]X-Declude-Spoolname: De27103530256df24.SMDPrecedence: 
bulkSender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Reply-To: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Date: 
Mon, 28 Jun 2004 23:34:33 -0400X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[68.162.218.198]X-Declude-Spoolname: De3476f6f00c6aec9.SMDX-Note: This 
E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for 
spam.X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]X-Country-Chain: UNITED 
STATES-POLAND-UNITED STATES-destinationX-Note: This E-mail was 
sent from dpvc-68-162-218-198.bos.east.verizon.net 
([68.162.218.198]).X-Note: Total Spam weight of this E-mail is 
0.X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Status: 
UX-UIDL: 385403722



  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On 
  Behalf Of AdminSent: Monday, June 28, 2004 10:35 
  PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: 
  [Declude.Virus] SPAMWT40:Attn:Urgent Sales Verification!Act 
  now!
  
  BUY CHEAP DRUGS,OVERNIGHT DELIVERY  


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Way OT: HTML code for tab

2004-06-29 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
John, 

It suppose to be #09; 

i.e. character code 09. 

Darrell 

-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and 
Imail.  Now released QueueMon an Imail/Declude Queue Monitoring Application. 


John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: 

Does any one know what the HTML code for a single tab is? 

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You 

 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Spam Review

2004-06-17 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
I was wondering is there a way to change what the Spam Hold button is
pointing to in Spam Review.  I am currently running Declude Hijack v1.75
and the held e-mails are being sent to the Hold2 folder and not Hold.  I
have not been using Spam Review much and wanted to start using it to
check if the held e-mails in hold2 are Spam or not.

Also I wanted to get some opinions on how Spam Review is working for
other people.  

 
Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Spam Review

2004-06-17 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
Yes I understand what Hijack is doing but I wanted to use Spam Review to
easily view the e-mails and send back to the spool folder if they are
valid instead of manually having to check each file individually.

 
Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff
(Lists)
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 9:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Spam Review

SpamReview is not intended to be used with Hijack, rather it is intended
to
be used with Declude JunkMail.

Do you understand what Hijack is doing if there are messages in Hold2?

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TCOnline Internet Support
 Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 7:11 AM
 To: Declude.JunkMail
 Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and Spam Review
 
 I was wondering is there a way to change what the Spam Hold button
is
 pointing to in Spam Review.  I am currently running Declude Hijack
v1.75
 and the held e-mails are being sent to the Hold2 folder and not Hold.
I
 have not been using Spam Review much and wanted to start using it to
 check if the held e-mails in hold2 are Spam or not.
 
 Also I wanted to get some opinions on how Spam Review is working for
 other people.
 
 
 Isaias Hernandez
 Internet Tech Support
 979-775-6239
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 ---
 [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
 
 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
 
 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Content Rules plus/vs. Sniffer?

2004-06-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Andy, 

I know I am not Matt, but I wanted to chime in here.  We have a lot of body 
filters and we use sniffer as well.  Mostly because we can quickly code 
rules to block spam that is coming in at that momemnt instead of waiting for 
a rule base update.  Also, not all of the spam we get ends up in the sniffer 
database.  We use our filters to compliment sniffer. 

Darrell 

-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and 
Imail. 

Andy Schmidt writes: 

Hey Matt: 

One question - I know that you have been spending a lot of time programming
content filters. 

I'm curious whether you are using Sniffer and whether you found that you
needed all those filters to improve detection over Sniffer rules (which then
makes me wonder why they are not made part of Sniffer) - or whether you are
trying to substitute Sniffer? 

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt 

HM Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846 

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:+1 201 934-9206 

http://www.HM-Software.com/ 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] IP4R DNS lookup

2004-06-17 Thread TCOnline Internet Support
I was wondering how reliable the ip4r lookups are.  There seems to be a
lot of SPAM that is only failing one of the ip4r test (SORBS, SBL, AHBL,
etc) and no more of the test, hence delivering the SPAM.  Is it safe to
increase the weight of all these test to my deletion weight in order to
stop them from being delivered or are there some false positives that
may be caught?

 
Isaias Hernandez
TC Online Internet Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] TESTSFAILED END Question

2004-06-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
I seen this post below and wanted to implement the TESTSFAILED to exit out 
of one of my body filters based on if another test was already triggered. 

Is the below line correct (assuming REVERSEDNSFILTER is one of my filters 
that occurs before the filter I put the below line in)? 

TESTSFAILED END CONTAINS REVERSEDNSFILTER 

[2] When that line is matched does it show in the logs? 

Darrell 

-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and 
Imail. 


Scott Fisher writes: 

I haven't found any easy way to tell. The information is in the logs at high level. 

But I can chime in that SKIPIFWEIGHT bypasses about 80% of my e-mail that is obviously spam. TESTSFAILED ENDS for friendly domains/revdns drop off about 8% of e-mail that is most likely not spam, leaving about 12% of the e-mail that I run body filters on. 

 

Scott Fisher
Director of IT
Farm Progress Companies 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/17/04 12:03PM 
Matt- 

My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often
they are run.  Is htere a convenient way to tell? 

-d 

- Original Message - 
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments 


Scott, 

I've got a lot more BODY filters than Dave has, though I don't feel that
they are excessive.  I probably have about 1,500 BODY searches, but with
SKIPIFWEIGHT they only run about 25% of the time. 

If Dave is using Declude Virus, I would also look there for the issue.
Anything besides F-Prot and ClamAV in daemon mode will chug a server on
a large attachment and it will use up far more processing than Declude
JunkMail, but it will keep the Declude instance alive for longer.  On
about 65,000 messages a day currently, we generally see from 2 to 10
Declude processes running at one time with both F-Prot and AVG enabled
(much less with just F-Prot).  Disabling AVG results in our average
processor utilization dropping by 1/3 to 1/2 on heavy load hours. 

Matt 


R. Scott Perry wrote: 


 One instance of Declude, then two, then three, all in the 25%+ range.
As
 soon as it dropped to two Decludes, Queue Manager came right in at
 30-40%,
 then the cycles dropped as QueueManager dropped down.


 It does sound like it is the large files that are causing the problem.

 One option would be to temporarily disable the BODY filter with the
 200 lines in it, to see if that prevents the problem with the high CPU
 usage in Declude JunkMail.  That could indeed be causing the problem.

 The other would be to use the debug mode (LOGLEVEL DEBUG in the
 \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file) and waiting for one of these files to
 be sent.  We can look at the debug log file entries to get a better
 idea of where the high CPU usage is occurring.

-Scott
 ---
 Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail
 mailservers since 2000.
 Declude Virus: Ultra reliable virus detection and the leader in
 mailserver vulnerability detection.
 Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)] 

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

 

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/ 
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)] 
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]  

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] RFC That Covers HELO BOGUS

2004-06-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Scott/Anyone, 

What is the RFC that covers HELO BOGUS?  I had wrote down RFC 821 4.3.  
However, when looking at that sub heading it covers Sequencing of Commands 
and Replies.  So I am thinking I must be wrong, because the only thing that 
I see relevant is the following lines 

Note: all the greeting type replies have the official name of
   the server host as the first word following the reply code 


Thanks
Darrell 

-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and 
Imail. 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Mail From Help

2004-06-10 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
I am sure this may just be a typo but you put CONTRAINS opposed to 
CONTAINS? 

Darrell
-
Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude and 
Imail. 

Kris McElroy writes: 

I am wanting to block anything in the From line that says Sapphirex, so
I created a filter called mail_from and it contains the following: 

MAILFROM	10	CONTRAINS	Sapphirex 

But for some reason this was allowed through?  I have a customer whom
gets about 100 of these a day from Sapphirex with random email
addresses? 

 

From: Sapphirex Expeditors [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Houck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Houck Residence: 9 N. 11th Mortgagor Statement
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 14:37:28 -0600
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary==_NextPart_000_0874_BE1151DD.45791A93
X-RBL-Warning: WEIGHT10: Weight of 13 reaches or exceeds the limit of
10.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [64.136.98.37]
X-Declude-Spoolname: Db87e40730100217b.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Duracom.Net for spam
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES-destination
X-Server: [65.66.8.6]Mailgateway2.duracom.net v.1.78
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from mx37.dacehadr.us ([64.136.98.37])
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: GREY_FILTER_BODY, GIBBERISH, ANTI-GIBBERISH,
MAILPOLICE-BULK, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, WEIGHT10 [13]
X-Note: Header code: e
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Note: Total Weight 13
X-Note: Please send abuse reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status: U
X-UIDL: 385411184 

 

Thanks, 

Kris McElroy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] MRTG For Declude and IMAIL

2004-04-26 Thread support
If anyone is interested in using MRTG with Declude or Imail we have made
available the program(s)that we are using to graph statistics.

For Declude Junkmail
* Graph A Test / Total Incoming Messages To Declude Junkmail

For Imail
* Total Incoming Connections
* Incoming Connections For a domain / total connections for the server
* Incoming And Outgoing Bytes
* Incoming And Outgoing Bytes For A Specific Domain
* Locally Delivered Messages / Remote Delivered messages

These utilities are available for free.  To check them out you can visit
http://www.invariantsystems.com

Darrell



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: ASCII code

2004-04-21 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Correct... 

Darrell 

John Tolmachoff (Lists) writes: 

A space is %20, correct? 

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You 

 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.invariantsystems.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish and Anti-Gibberish Testing

2004-04-14 Thread TC Online Support
I have been using the SPAM filters from MailPure and I have notices that
the Anti-Gibberish Test has been triggered a lot more than the Gibberish
test (5:1 ratio)  The Anti-Gibberish Test has been causing a lot of SPAM
to go through by applying negative weight to the message.  I was
wondering if there was a way to skip the Anti-Gibberish Test if the
Gibberish is not triggered.  (This goes to all the test that contain an
Anti- test)

Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] ARGOLINKs SPAM Graph

2004-04-14 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Terry, 

I orginally looked at the argolink spam graph, but as the doc's mentioned it 
goes through the full log file from beginning to end.  Our log files are 
big, but it would tie up the cpu for a bit ~10-15 minutes. 

We just finished a seperate program that can be used with MRTG to graph 
junkmail stats.  The program is done and I am using it.  I just have to 
package it up and write some small doc's on it.  I am in the process of 
finishing up the program that can be used to link Imail to MRTG as well.  
Both will be made available for free shortly. 

I will send a note out when everything is posted on our site.. 

Darrell 

Terry Parks writes: 

OT, A little, any body got it going? I got it to display just the page with
the word GRAPH on it. Using Windows 2003. 




Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.invariantsystems.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] e-commerce counter weights

2004-03-29 Thread Technical Support



Most of my false 
positives are coming from e-commerce sites, where automatic email are generated 
after an order has been placed. What sort of counter weighting do you guys 
use to balance out these types of messages? I can't decide on anything to 
identify these types of messages with that spammers don't already try to 
fake. Any help would be much appreciated.


Thank you for making YourNET 
Connection your connection to the world

Jim O'Keefe Technical 
Support @YourNET Connection, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Windows 2000 Performance Monitor

2004-03-17 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, 

I monitor a bunch of counters (memory, cpu, process, disk, network, etc) on 
our servers.  I roll the perf logs on a daily basis.  The hard thing in 
tracking this stuff is that when you add process counters there is no way to 
track all of the individual processes for declude/imail/sniffer.  What you 
will see is each Declude process will show like Declude#1, Declude#2, etc, 
etc.  What I ended up doing is setting the process counters up at a busy 
time on my server to capture as many of the ...#1 processes. 

Darrell 

Matt writes: 

I've never bothered to run monitoring before, but I need to do so now so 
that I can make more informed decisions.  Does anyone have a good 
config/setup that they want to share which is most effective at tracking 
usage primarily related to an IMail/Declude/Sniffer setup?  Should I be 
storing this data in SQL Server?  Etc. 

Thanks, 

Matt 

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Cheap router to limit by IP

2004-03-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, 

I used to put routers in these types of situations, but now I don't.  I 
would suggest you/your customer look at some of the low end Netscreen 
firewalls like a 5GT.  You can get these under $500 and they have way more 
value than a router.. 

One of the best things about the netscreen devices is they can be installed 
in transparent mode.  Which means no ip configuration required.  You just 
basically put it inline of the server and configure the rules on it. 

http://www.netscreen.com/products/at_a_glance/ds_5xt.jsp 

Darrell 


Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 



Matt writes: 

I have yet another customer that is running GroupWise 5x that is getting 
attacked by some asian spammer trying to dictionary attack Yahoo.co.jp and 
other regional sites.  Until they can get onto GroupWise 6 (which will 
reject at the SMTP envelope), my recommendation was for them to install a 
new router capable of limiting port 25 to just my server's IP, the only 
problem is that he needs something fast and cheap. 

Does anyone know of any cheap, chain store stocked routers that are 
capable of limiting a particular port to a particular IP on inbound only 
(it still has to deliver by SMTP, just only receive from my IP)?  I figure 
that the following are the best candidates based on the fact that they are 
readily available. 

   http://www.compusa.com/products/products.asp?N=200158CusaNe=200139 

Note that he only needs to firewall one port. 

BTW, if you are running GroupWise 5.x (including 5.5.5), this asian 
spammer will stick a group of zombies on your machine for weeks on end 
even if in fact your server is not actually relaying the messages.  This 
is the same spammer that is responsible for the majority of the Job-Jobs 
that my locally hosted domains see right now. 

Thanks, 

Matt 

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Server Recommendation

2004-03-12 Thread TC Online Support
We are currently looking to upgrade our mail server.  Lately the
processing of the CPU has causing the SMTP to be working real slow,
causing a lot of timeouts.  We currently we are running a P3 1.133GHz
with 512MB RAM.  We are looking to upgrade to a dual processor.  

I was wondering if anybody was willing to share what type of server
hardware they are using and if anybody had any recommendations on the
CPU power and RAM to have optimal performance.

Also I was wondering what amount of SPAM is being received by other
ISPs.  Currently over 90% of all incoming mail to our server is SPAM.  I
just wanted to see if this is normal for an ISP.


Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Recommendation

2004-03-12 Thread TC Online Support
We currently send and receive about 40,000 to 50,000 e-mails daily.  The
processes that are taking up the most CPU are multiple instances of
declude.exe and NTVDM.exe.  We tried to comment out some of our SPAM
test to see if it would help and it has freed up some CPU.  The SPAM
test that were commented out were the ones provided by mailpure.com
(Gibberish, Y!directed, etc).  Are these tests really worth having to
test for SPAM or can they be removed?

Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

We are currently looking to upgrade our mail server.  Lately the
processing of the CPU has causing the SMTP to be working real slow,
causing a lot of timeouts.  We currently we are running a P3 1.133GHz
with 512MB RAM.  We are looking to upgrade to a dual processor.

How many E-mails do you send/receive per day?  When you use Task Manager

and sort the processes by CPU usage, which one(s) are using the most
CPU?

-Scott


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Server Recommendation

2004-03-12 Thread TC Online Support
NTVDM.exe is used for 16-bit processes, and can indeed cause some
servers 
to slow down to a crawl.  Are you using F-Prot.exe with Declude Virus?
If 
so, you should switch to the 32-bit fpcmd.exe version.

We are using f-prot.exe with Declude Virus.  How do we check to make
sure it is running in the 32-bit mode.  I was under the impression it
was already running in this mode.  Can someone post the command line
used to run f-prot in the 32-bit mode or send me an e-mail directly?
Thanks.


Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] test gfdsghb

2004-03-10 Thread TC Online Support
nfdhgfgf

Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread Technical Support




Does this mean that 
I am running lookups on the wrong hop?

My mail server is 
ync.net
the sender's mail 
server is mail.webagency.net
from the 
headers:

Received: from SMTP32-FWD by ync.net (SMTP32) 
id A060810EB; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:04:18 -0600Received: from 
mail.webagency.net [216.118.193.135] by ync.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) 
id A5D712BB00EE; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 08:04:07 -0600Received: from pal01 
[24.15.209.24] by mail.webagency.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-7.13) id 
A3743032C; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:53:56 -0600
This message was also 
in the headers and is the cause of my concern:
X-RBL-Warning: 
HELOBOGUS: Domain pal01 returns a server failure for MX or A 
records.
Why did it run on 
pal01? Shouldn't it run on 
mail.webagency.net?
Thank you for making YourNET 
Connection your connection to the world

Jim O'Keefe Technical 
Support @YourNET Connection, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 




RE: [Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?

2004-03-03 Thread Technical Support
HOP 1
and I don't have any IPBYPASS, I have it commented out.
I also have HOPHIGH commented out.

Thank you for making YourNET Connection your connection to the world
 
Jim O'Keefe 
Technical Support 
@YourNET Connection, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  


-Original Message-
From: R. Scott Perry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] wrong hop?



Does this mean that I am running lookups on the wrong hop?

It sounds like it.

My mail server is ync.net
the sender's mail server is mail.webagency.net
from the headers:

Received: from SMTP32-FWD by ync.net  (SMTP32) id A060810EB; Wed,  3
Mar 
2004 08:04:18 -0600
Received: from mail.webagency.net [216.118.193.135] by ync.net with 
ESMTP  (SMTPD32-8.05) id A5D712BB00EE; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 08:04:07 -0600
Received: from pal01 [24.15.209.24] by mail.webagency.net with 
ESMTP  (SMTPD32-7.13) id A3743032C; Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:53:56 -0600

Here, you should be scanning the IP 216.118.193.135, and
mail.webagency.net.

This message was also in the headers and is the cause of my concern:

X-RBL-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain pal01 returns a server failure for MX
or 
A records.

So this is wrong.

What are you HOP and IPBYPASS settings in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg
file?

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses by the YourNet Connection
Virus system]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS timeout and DNS configuration - does it get logged?

2004-02-26 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
DNS line in the \IMail\Declude\global.cfg file).  Note that it is 
recommended (with or without Declude) that you only use 1 DNS server in 
the IMail SMTP settings.
What types of problems tend to crop up with multiple DNS servers listed in 
Imail? 

Darrell
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
We are setup currently using HOPHIGH 1.  With using a HOPHIGH setting of 
1.  What we are seeing is an increase in messages that are gettng caught 
with XBL, DSBL, SORBS, and other tests along this line on the second HOP 
even though they were legit messages that were sent through normal ISP 
servers. 

How many folks are using HOPHIGH 1?  Also, for tests like XBL, DSBL, and 
others along this line are you changing them to XBL-DUL to only work on the 
first HOP? 

Thanks
Darrell
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, 

Thats actually a very good idea I am going to incorporate.  How did you come 
up with the scoring balance between first and second hop? 

Darrell 

Matt writes: 

You need to segment your tests between Spamtraps/Zombies/Relays and Static 
Sources.  Static sources such as SBL should have no increase in FP's over 
multiple hops, however XBL, SpamCop, ORDB and others will.  What I do is 
trick Declude into splitting the test scores giving the last hop a higher 
score than a hit that sits before the last hop, but only for the 
Spamtraps/Zombies/Relays types of tests.  Here's an example: 

# Spam Traps (staggered scoring per hop)
SPAMCOP(DYNA)  ip4rbl.spamcop.net  127.0.0.240
SPAMCOP(ALL)   ip4rbl.spamcop.net  127.0.0.220
XBL(DYNA)  ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.460
XBL(ALL)   ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.420 

The (DYNA) part of the name makes Declude only use that test on the last 
hop, while the (ALL) has no special function and it will hit on any hop 
that is scanned.  Last hop hits will score both, but prior hop hits will 
only score the (ALL) version for a lower score.  This definitely helped my 
spam capture rates, but I have caught some zombies that were sending 
legitimate E-mail, though they score very low and many of them pass. 

I've suggested before that extra columns be added to Declude for such 
tests so that we can control the score they give according to the hop that 
they hit on.  The full description of this suggestion is in the recent 
archives. 

Note that negative weight tests need to be kept exclusively to the last 
hop because they do get spoofed in forged headers, and also, RHSBL tests 
are not hop aware since they pull a domain from the MAILFROM instead of 
the hops, so you don't need to do anything special with these tests. 

Matt 

DLAnalyzer Support wrote: 

We are setup currently using HOPHIGH 1.  With using a HOPHIGH setting 
of 1.  What we are seeing is an increase in messages that are gettng 
caught with XBL, DSBL, SORBS, and other tests along this line on the 
second HOP even though they were legit messages that were sent through 
normal ISP servers.
How many folks are using HOPHIGH 1?  Also, for tests like XBL, DSBL, and 
others along this line are you changing them to XBL-DUL to only work on 
the first HOP?
Thanks
Darrell
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 


--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] HOP HIGH / Spam Tests

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Matt, 

For the dyna/dul tests I though the test name had to end with either DYNA or 
DUL.  I noticed you use (DYNA) - does it (declude) just look for the work 
dyna or dul to limit it to one hop? 

Darrell 

Matt writes: 

I basically came up with a rule where the (DYNA) test gets 3/4 to 2/3 of 
the points, and the (ALL) test gets 1/4 to 1/3 of the points.  To air on 
the side of caution, I would step the points up on the (DYNA) test until 
it reached 3/4 and then I would add another point to the (ALL) test, i.e. 

3 = 2  1
4 = 3  1
5 = 4  1
6 = 4  2
7 = 5  2
8 = 6  2
9 = 7  2
10 = 7  3 

Here's my current list of split tests, the hardest part is understanding 
which ones qualify, and that can take some reading: 

# Relay Lists (staggered scoring per hop)
AHBL-PROXIES(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org127.0.0.33
0
AHBL-PROXIES(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.ahbl.org127.0.0.310
BLITZEDALL(DYNA)ip4ropm.blitzed.org*50
BLITZEDALL(ALL)ip4ropm.blitzed.org*20
DSBL(DYNA)ip4rlist.dsbl.org127.0.0.250
DSBL(ALL)ip4rlist.dsbl.org127.0.0.220
FIVETEN-MISC(DYNA)ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com127.0.0.93 
   0
FIVETEN-MISC(ALL)ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com127.0.0.91  
  0
FIVETEN-MULTI(DYNA)ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com127.0.0.5
30
FIVETEN-MULTI(ALL)ip4rblackholes.five-ten-sg.com127.0.0.51 
   0
NJABL-RELAYS(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org127.0.0.23
0
NJABL-RELAYS(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org127.0.0.21
0
ORDB(DYNA)ip4rrelays.ordb.org*50
ORDB(ALL)ip4rrelays.ordb.org*20
SORBS-HTTP(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.240
SORBS-HTTP(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.22   
 0
SORBS-MISC(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.440
SORBS-MISC(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.42   
 0
SORBS-SMTP(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.540
SORBS-SMTP(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.52   
 0
SORBS-SOCKS(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.34
0
SORBS-SOCKS(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.sorbs.net127.0.0.320
NJABL-PROXIES(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org127.0.0.96   
 0
NJABL-PROXIES(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org127.0.0.92
0
NJABL-MULTI(DYNA)ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org127.0.0.53
0
NJABL-MULTI(ALL)ip4rdnsbl.njabl.org127.0.0.510 

# Spam Traps (staggered scoring per hop)
SPAMCOP(DYNA)ip4rbl.spamcop.net127.0.0.240
SPAMCOP(ALL)ip4rbl.spamcop.net127.0.0.220
XBL(DYNA)ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.460
XBL(ALL)ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.420 

It's of course ugly, but I believe it makes the most sense to do it this 
way.  I did this at the same time that I moved over to multiple hop 
testing (I test the last 4 hops since my server can handle it currently 
and that helps with forwarding).  I've only seen a few FP's as a result of 
tagged zombies sending legit E-mail, maybe a couple a week and always just 
barely failing.  Note that all of these scored are based on a hold weight 
of 10 or 13. 

Matt 

 

DLAnalyzer Support wrote: 

Matt,
Thats actually a very good idea I am going to incorporate.  How did you 
come up with the scoring balance between first and second hop?
Darrell
Matt writes: 

You need to segment your tests between Spamtraps/Zombies/Relays and 
Static Sources.  Static sources such as SBL should have no increase in 
FP's over multiple hops, however XBL, SpamCop, ORDB and others will.  
What I do is trick Declude into splitting the test scores giving the 
last hop a higher score than a hit that sits before the last hop, but 
only for the Spamtraps/Zombies/Relays types of tests.  Here's an 
example:
# Spam Traps (staggered scoring per hop)
SPAMCOP(DYNA)  ip4rbl.spamcop.net  127.0.0.24
0
SPAMCOP(ALL)   ip4rbl.spamcop.net  127.0.0.22
0
XBL(DYNA)  ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.46
0
XBL(ALL)   ip4rsbl-xbl.spamhaus.org127.0.0.42
0
The (DYNA) part of the name makes Declude only use that test on the last 
hop, while the (ALL) has no special function and it will hit on any hop 
that is scanned.  Last hop hits will score both, but prior hop hits will 
only score the (ALL) version for a lower score.  This definitely helped 
my spam capture rates, but I have caught some zombies that were sending 
legitimate E-mail, though they score very low and many of them pass.
I've suggested before that extra columns

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Yahoo, Sendmail to test antispam system

2004-02-24 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Actually, Bill announced today at the RAS conference that Windows XP SP2 
should fix the virus issue. 

Beyond the Windows service release, Gates also showed off ``active 
protection technologies'' that will gird Windows computers against attacks 
by sensing changes in the network that indicate virus activity. If a problem 
is detected, the computer's firewall will dynamically ratchet up defenses. 

It's all under control now :) 

Darrell 

Matt writes: 

Web scripts come to mind as an obvious exception that probably won't be 
covered by this. 

I'm not concerned about this though...Bill Gates said that he would solve 
the spam problem by 2005...right after they figure out how to stop viruses 
of course... 

Matt 

 

Matt Robertson wrote: 

Anyone have any comments on how effective this will be (or not...)?


What good is this if *everyone* doesn't use it? 


Matt Robertson   [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc.  
http://mysecretbase.com
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

  

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 




Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis

2004-02-23 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
That was our log parsing tool (DLAnalyzer).  Our mail servers are very busy 
and we often see a lot of the lines intermixed during peak times.  We make 
every attempt to interpet mixed logging lines to extract as much information 
out of the lines, but sometimes its so intermixed its impossible so the 
information gets discarded as unusable.  It would be nice to have syslogging 
as a feature. 

However, it may not be very easy to integrate syslogging support into 
Declude.  I am curious to know if the majoriety of folks would prefer that 
the focus of the developer(s) be maintained on developing new spam features 
versus re-tooling Declude to work with a syslog daemon.  Depending on the 
amount of work my preference (if a lot of work was required) would be to 
spend the time working on new spam detection features. 

Darrell

Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

Charles Frolick writes: 

I ran across this when I wrote my graphing app, and someone else that
wrote a log parser said they had to skip those lines as well, so the end
result is lost information.  High volume servers are going to be a lot
more likely to suffer. I know there is a solution, what it is I don't
know.  The ability to write to a syslog daemon would help, it could
buffer the input data and commit to the log file with full locking.   

Just a thought, Scott, you already send log info to Declude Console, how
about using Declude console or some other helper app as the log writer,
keeps the conversation local and should resolve the whole two processes
write to the same line issue? 

Thanks,
Chuck Frolick
ArgoLink.net
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 3:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis 

Ick :) 

LOGLEVEL MID doesn't look nearly as bad, though there will be the
occasional series of line breaks with code appearing in it.  I haven't
tried parsing the logs with anything but DLAnalyzer though. 

Matt 

Colbeck, Andrew wrote: 

Ahem, like I said, the attachment. 

Andrew ;) 

-Original Message-
From: Colbeck, Andrew 
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 12:58 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis 

Matt, it's not that I particularly want the log files to be neatly
ordered
instead of interleaved.  Although it would be nice, I'm used to
identifying
the Q... number first and then filtering out the one(s) I want for
examination. 

My bugbear is that individual lines are garbled, the start of new log
lines
appearing in the middle of other log lines.  See the accompanying
snippet
for a sample.  I have not added or removed any CR/LF from that sample. 

Back in the stone age, I implemented a very similar logging system that
was
also multi-process, and locking was feared to be too much of a drain.
For
readability, I wanted the log to not be interleaved, and I also wanted
to
avoid generating unique names for the logs, so instead of printing the
lines
instantly, I appended to a string, complete with CR/LF, and at the end
of
the task, I then implemented a lock, spin, write, unlock routine. 

Andrew 8( 

-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Feature-itis 

Andrew, 

I just wanted to chime in and say that I of course would love to see 
non-text base64 stuff thrown out before scanning, and allow us to target 

only unencoded text strings.  The idea of scanning only the decoded text 

would also be a big processor saver and the primary method, so maybe you 

would make the decoded choice the BODY filter and have a BODYSOURCE 
filter for the encoded version.  It's important that a filter have the 
ability to scan MIME attachment descriptors though, so a method to 
provide for that would be necessary as well.  Maybe a BODYSOURCE check 
would match what a BODY filter does today even with the source of the 
attachments. 

Regarding the logging, I'm not sure about the garbling, but streamed log 

files like Declude's, IMail's and all sorts of HTTP stuff is generally 
done on demand instead of grouped together.  I believe there are 
definite advantages beyond speed for doing this.  It does though lack a 
unique identifier as a single field which might be nice for log parsing, 

and maybe that's what's needed here.  Something like the spool file name 

with a -1 appended to it which increments and appears on each line 
would do the trick, am I right?  That would certainly make things easier 

to parse. 

Matt 

Colbeck, Andrew wrote: 

  
Far be it for me to halt progress... 

Scott, I can't wait to put in the new TESTSFAILED logic.  I've wanted
exactly this to keep certain multi-answer ip4r tests in check, and Matt
is
off to a great start in combining tests... 

I

[Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM

2004-02-18 Thread TC Online Support
I received a message from a customer that was receiving SPAM.  For some
reason, this message was whitelisted but we do not have any of theses
domains or IP addresses whitelisted.  Am I missing something from this
message header or can someone add the whitelist line to the message
header.  

The header from the message was as follows:

Received: from tcmall.com [80.146.192.132] by mail.tconline.net
  (SMTPD32-7.15) id AD08F1D023A; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 06:46:00 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: berry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 05:47:56 GMT
Subject: A D-r-u-g more potent than VIAG-RA?!
Content-Type: text/plain;
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [80.146.192.132]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com)
for spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from [No Reverse DNS] ([80.146.192.132]).
X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Here is a header for another message:

Received: from tcoek12.org [208.17.78.98] by mail.tconline.net
  (SMTPD32-7.15) id A7411A740262; Wed, 18 Feb 2004 05:06:41 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: vince [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:05:55 GMT
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Would you like to get laid TONIGHT?!
Content-Type: text/html;
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [208.17.78.98]
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com)
for spam.
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: Whitelisted [0]
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from user98.net270.lv.sprint-hsd.net
([208.17.78.98]).
X-RCPT-TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks,

Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM

2004-02-18 Thread TC Online Support
I have checked the log and found out the reason the message was
whitelisted.  Here is the scenario...

A Spammer sends e-mail to multiple customers of ours.  One of these
customers does not want anything to be filtered from his e-mail so we
added WHITELISTTO [EMAIL PROTECTED]

My question is if one of our customers is whitelisted, is everyone
receiving this message going to be receiving the whitelisted message?
If so, is there a way to whitelist only that one customer and not the
other messages that are going to other users?

Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting and SPAM


I received a message from a customer that was receiving SPAM.  For some
reason, this message was whitelisted but we do not have any of theses
domains or IP addresses whitelisted.  Am I missing something from this
message header or can someone add the whitelist line to the message
header.

Have you checked the Declude JunkMail log file?  It should say why the 
E-mail was whitelisted.  Do you have mail.com whitelisted?  That would

cause the E-mail to be whitelisted.



-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers 
since 2000.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Gibberish filter not working

2004-02-14 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Todd, 

Yes we do have a version that is compatible with the new log file changes.  
You need to download 2.0.6R. 

Darrell 


Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 



Todd writes: 

Thanks Matt, 

   I have the interim release in now and the filter is working.  I do 
use DLAlalyzer so I will check that I have the latest version of that. I 
see what you mean about the Declude logs.  The Low setting is much 
different. 

Thanks again, 

Todd 

 

At 03:18 PM 2/14/2004, you wrote:
http://www.declude.com/interim/ 

Note that I'm not using the very latest interim release, and there can be 
issues or other unexplained behavior from one version to the next, and 
they change frequently.  Certainly monitor things if you are going to 
install this just in case, though I haven't seen any major issues 
reported for weeks.  Most issues usually relate to new functionality.
The log file format changed from the beta version, at least at the LOW 
level, and that can impact programs that parse them.  There is a new 
version of DLAnalyzer that works with the new formats if you use that. 

Matt 

Todd wrote: 

I dont see a link on the Declude manual to that version of the beta.
Is this something that I can dl? 

Thanks, 

Todd 

 

At 02:02 PM 2/14/2004, you wrote: 

Todd, 

You have to use at least the 1.77i7 or higher interim release.  In the 
initial beta release the END functionality would always trigger which 
effectively disabled the test. 

Matt 

 

Todd wrote: 

I updated to the Gibberish 2.1.0 filter and now the filter is not 
working.  The previous 1.07 filter worked fine.  I have DJ Pro v 1.77 
- re-downloaded today to be sure. 

Todd Hunter 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com. 

--
=
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
= 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] How do I stop the reply to potentialvirus senders?

2004-02-05 Thread Avolve Support
Declude automatically does not send out email notifications to people that the email 
was intended for or who sent them ?

Without any configuration ?

What version is that if it is so ?



-- Original Message --
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:28:37 -0500


What with all the ^%$#%@ viruses and junk mail and forged and spoofed 
email addresses ... how do I stop the response sent by Declude? Or can I 
or should I?

Declude should *not* be sending a response (either to a forging virus, or 
to spam).

If you look at the thread DUMBAVFILTER ip4r ?, it covers some ideas on 
how to stop the bogus notifications that are being sent out.

Note that if you get any Mydoom notifications from Declude Virus running on 
other servers, I would like to know about it -- we are contacting our 
customers that are sending out the bogus notifications.

Also ... I tried to find the setup instructions on the web but couldn't 
find them ... Scott could you point me in the right direction please ...

You can find the instructions at http://www.declude.com/junkmail/manual.htm .

-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
vulnerability detection.
Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]



--
Avolve Support
Get High Speed Internet - Go Wireless !
http://www.avolvewireless.net
--
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus By Avolve.net]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Keyword filtering AND Aliases

2004-02-05 Thread TC Online Support
This is a two part question:  

First, I had a question about filtering using keywords.  I have the
following command in the global.cfg:

KEYWORDFILTER   filter  d:\Imail\.\keywordfilter.txtx
10  0

To help stop some of the SPAM that is going through the server, keywords
are added to the keywordfilter.txt file.  I was wondering if this test
is checking attachments and if so, how can I set it to skip over the
scanning of attachments for keywords.  

Second, we also host a number of websites.  One of our customers has a
personal account on Domain A and has a business account on Domain B.
They have it set to forward the e-mails from Domain B to Domain A,
literally having Domain B's e-mail address set as an alias.  For some
reason, Declude is blocking this message.  I'm not sure which test it is
failing as I was told by someone else of this problem.  The problem was
fixed by whitelisting the domains but I was just wondering if there was
a better way to do this instead of whitelisting.  

Sorry for the vagueness of the second question.


Isaias Hernandez
Internet Tech Support
979-775-6239
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] **OT** Intrusion Detection Software

2004-02-04 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Snort... 

darrell 

Sharyn Schmidt writes: 

I have been asked to research Intrusion Detection Software. 

I have done a Google search, but most of what I see is an actual
appliance. 

All I am looking for is software that will notify me when something
suspicious attempts to hit our network. 

Anyone have any suggestions? 

Sharyn



Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Domain Registrar recommendation

2004-01-31 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Todd, 

Dotster.com has always been good to us. 

Darrell

Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

Todd writes: 

Anyone using a registrar that they like?  I want to get some of my clients 
accounts off of NetSol.  I have some registered at www.dotearth.com but I 
would like a registrar that I can maintain multiple domains from a central 
interface like at NetSol. 

Thanks, 

Todd Hunter  

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus 
(http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

2004-01-28 Thread TC Online Support








What are the best test weights to use for scanning e-mails
from AOL and Yahoo. We are catching many valid e-mails and many SPAM
e-mails are going through. We have been getting many complaints from
customers about blocking valid e-mails that we have been temporarily
whitelisted the domains. 



Also are there any other tests that can be done to stop the
amount of SPAM sent to our uses. 80%-90% of our network traffic is incoming
SPAM and much is going through.



Thanks,



Isaias Hernandez

TC Online Internet Tech Support

[EMAIL PROTECTED]














RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

2004-01-28 Thread TC Online Support
This is our global.cfg file.


Isaias Hernandez

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2004 3:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL, Yahoo

Would you mind posting your global.cfg? Redact whatever you want 
private. With that maybe some good suggestions can be made

-Nick Hayer


From:   TC Online Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[Declude.JunkMail] Best Test for SPAM from AOL,
Yahoo
Date sent:  Wed, 28 Jan 2004 15:20:42 -0600
Send reply to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 What are the best test weights to use for scanning e-mails from AOL
 and Yahoo.  We are catching many valid e-mails and many SPAM e-mails
 are going through.  We have been getting many complaints from
 customers about blocking valid e-mails that we have been temporarily
 whitelisted the domains.  
 
 
 
 Also are there any other tests that can be done to stop the amount of
 SPAM sent to our uses.  80%-90% of our network traffic is incoming
 SPAM and much is going through.
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 
 
 Isaias Hernandez
 
 TC Online Internet Tech Support
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

#
# Declude JunkMail configuration file.
#
# This file has the global Declude JunkMail settings, defines the tests, and lists the
# actions to take on outgoing E-mail (for the Pro version; not normally used).
#

CODE3C3EF29C

#  in the LOGFILE option, if present, automatically gets replaced with the 
month/date.

LOGFILE spool\dec.log
LOGLEVELLOW
HOP 0
#HOPHIGH1

#
# Below are some advanced options
#

XINHEADER   X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) 
for spam.
XINHEADER   X-Spam-Tests-Failed: %TESTSFAILED% [%WEIGHT%]
#XINHEADER  X-Country-Chain: %COUNTRYCHAIN%
XOUTHEADER  X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) 
for spam.
XSENDER ON
XSPOOLNAME  OFF
#XINHEADER  X-Note: This E-mail was sent from %REVDNS% ([%REMOTEIP%]).
#XOUTHEADER Organization: Your Name Here
#IPBYPASS   127.0.0.1
WHITELIST   HABEAS

#
# Definitions of the tests to use (do not edit unless you know what you are doing).
# These must come before the actions.
#
# First is the name of the check, then the type of check (ip4r is a DNS lookup using 
# the reverse of the IP address).
#
# For type ip4r, 'matchstring' is the string to look for, or * for anything.
#

DSBLip4rlist.dsbl.org   *   10  0
MONKEYFORMMAIL  ip4rformmail.relays.monkeys.com *   10  0
MONKEYPROXIES   ip4rproxies.relays.monkeys.com  *   10  0
ORDBip4rrelays.ordb.org *   5   0
OSDIPS  ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.3   5   0
OSFORM  ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.8   6   0
OSLIST  ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.7   5   0
OSPROXY ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.9   7   0
OSRELAY ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.2   4   0
OSSMART ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.5   5   0
OSSOFT  ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.6   5   0
OSSRC   ip4rrelays.osirusoft.com127.0.0.4   1   0
SPAMCOP ip4rbl.spamcop.net  127.0.0.2   10  0
WIREHUB-DNSBL   ip4rblackholes.wirehub.net  127.0.0.2   10  0

DSN rhsbl   dsn.rfc-ignorant.org127.0.0.2   5   0
NOABUSE rhsbl   abuse.rfc-ignorant.org  127.0.0.4   2   0
NOPOSTMASTERrhsbl   postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org 127.0.0.3   2   0

BADHEADERS  badheaders  x   x   8   0
BASE64  base64  x   x   4   0
HELOBOGUS   helovalid   x   x   7   0
MAILFROMenvfrom x   x   12  0
IPNOTINMX   ipnotinmx   x   x   1   0
PERCENT percent x   x   10  0
REVDNS  revdnsexistsx   x   3   0
ROUTING spamrouting x   x   5   0
SPAMHEADERS spamheaders x   x   5   0

#SNIFFERexternalnonzero C:\IMail\Declude\Sniffer\sniffer.exe 
authentication   7   0

#WEIGHT5weight  x   x5  0
#WEIGHT7weight  x   x7  0
WEIGHT10weight  x   x   10  0
WEIGHT15weight  x   x   15  0   
WEIGHT20weight  x   x   20  0


CATCHALLMAILS   catchallmails

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

2004-01-15 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
Winzip has a command line utility add in. 

Darrell 

ISPhuset Nordic AS writes: 

Hi a little off topic 

Anyone knowing off a free or nearly free zip utility which can pack some files to a zip archive. 

unpacking isn't a problem  

It is a must that it can run for a command prompt 

Benny 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] 

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.



Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

2004-01-15 Thread Hosting Support
winzip is only $29...and the command line add-on is free to registered
users.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: ISPhuset Nordic AS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:13 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt


Hi a little off topic

Anyone knowing off a free or nearly free zip utility which can pack some
files to a zip archive.

unpacking isn't a problem

It is a must that it can run for a command prompt

Benny

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]



_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

2004-01-15 Thread Hosting Support
Well..for 150 it's only $7.00/PC, which is pretty low.  One thing I like
about winzip is that you buy it once and get every upgrade in the future.
I purchased it about 7 years ago and have upgraded two major versions so
far, and a third is about to come out.

For free, you might check around sourceforge to see if there are any
projects that meets your needs.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: ISPhuset Nordic AS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 8:47 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt


Yes i know but i hvae to distribute this on 150 boxes and that is a lot of
licenses :-)

so free or nearly free are the keyword here

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 DLAnalyzer Support
 Sent: 15. januar 2004 14:37
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OT zip from command prompt

 Winzip has a command line utility add in.

 Darrell


 ISPhuset Nordic AS writes:

  Hi a little off topic
 
  Anyone knowing off a free or nearly free zip utility which
 can pack some files to a zip archive.
 
  unpacking isn't a problem
 
  It is a must that it can run for a command prompt
 
  Benny
 
  ---
  [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]
 
  ---
  This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
  unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
  type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
  at http://www.mail-archive.com.



  
 Check Out DLAnalyzer a comprehensive reporting tool for
 Declude Junkmail Logs - http://www.dlanalyzer.com

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.


---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]



_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


[Declude.JunkMail] DLAnalyzer - Update Available For The New Log File Changes

2004-01-13 Thread DLAnalyzer Support
For those who have downloaded/currently using DLAnalyzer to process thier 
Declude Junkmail Logs an update is available that supports the new log file 
format found in 1.77i15+.  It is also backward compatible and will still 
continue to work with the older log files as well. 

Please see the read me notes that addresses some new features added as well 
as some bug fixes for the GUI configuration utility. 

You can download the update from our site http://www.dlanalyzer.com.
Darrell 

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

2004-01-13 Thread Hosting Support
Hi Nick,

I put together a simple one in .NET for MS DNS that uses SQL2K and the
dnscmd utility to manage the most common functions in DNS (adding, deleting
Host and MX records).  Note that it does currently require IIS, the .NET
framework, and SQL2K on the MS DNS server.  If you're interested, we can
talk offline to see if it is a fit for your needs.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: Nick Hayer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console


Can anyone recommend a web interfaced dns management console for end
users? Want end users to be able to manage their own domains eg:
adding, deleting, edits. Thanks much!

-Nick Hayer

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]



_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

2004-01-13 Thread Hosting Support
Totally agree, John.  That's why the simple interface I put together has
multiple security levels: one for users that could get into trouble by
accidentally deleting their MX records and www, etc. hostsand another
for more educated users who can be trusted to manage those.  Generally
shared hosting users can get access to the simple things like adding and
deleting , and collocated customers can perform somewhat more advanced tasks
like MX and common host (www, ftp, mail, etc.) record management.

Overall, it saves us a small amount of support time and makes some of our
customers happy when they have the power to make changes themselves without
having to contact someone else to do it.

Darin.


- Original Message - 
From: John Tolmachoff (Lists) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:30 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console


GENERAL WARNING.

More control available to the end user means more problems can be created by
the end user.

John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer
 Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:09 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] *OT* Web dns management console

 Can anyone recommend a web interfaced dns management console for end
 users? Want end users to be able to manage their own domains eg:
 adding, deleting, edits. Thanks much!

 -Nick Hayer

 ---
 [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
 (http://www.declude.com)]

 ---
 This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
 unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
 type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
 at http://www.mail-archive.com.

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]



_
[This E-mail virus scanned by 4C Web]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail.  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.


  1   2   3   >