[DX-CHAT] ZK2C - OQRS
I really believe that the OQRS system is a real benefit for getting QSL's from major DXpeditions. I am sure it is much easier for the DXped QSL managers and provides a small donation to the group . It has worked very well for me on all previous DXped's. It is, however, only as good as the manager's running the program. I had been told that the ZK2C OQRS cards came out quite a while ago, but I had received nothing here. I have the receipt number from PayPal so I know they got my funds and request. I finally sent an email to DL7JAN and he said his records indicated he had sent mine, but he would send another. After many weeks of waiting and not receiving anything, I sent another email and he answered that he was pretty sure he had sent it. I waited additional weeks and still nothing came. My last 2 emails have been ignored. Has anyone had a similar experience on OQRS for this operation?? I guess another option would be to contact PayPal and tell them I received nothing for the fee that I paid. Not sure what that would accomplish other than letting them know that this person doesn't deliver on what he has been paid for. I am out over $4 USD now and got nothing. John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] ZK2C??
Anyone know the status of QSLing from ZK2C?? John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Nye Viking MB-V-A Antenna Tuner
I am trying to find someone who can repair the metering circuit on a Nye Viking MB-V-A Antenna Tuner. Also, if you have one in good physical and working condition, please forward the contact information to me. Thank You John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] ST0R-LOTW
Gentlemen, I hope I didn't light this flame a week or so with my request for info re ST0R and LOTW. My apologies if I am guilty. This worn out thread needs to be buried. Please read what Ryan said in his email (below) as he is right on the mark. Most DXpeditions are not going to instantly put their logs on LOTW and shouldn't be expected to do so. They have substantial costs to try and recover, and we should help them do it or DXpeditions are going to disappear. I doubt very much that anyone is making money by doing a DXpedition, and are frequently exposing themselves to personal safety and health risks. Be kind and considerate to the guys who take these risks to put a QSO in your log. John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll Are you sure they did it? Their webpage says this: Donors and Sponsors will receive LoTW CFMs after the DXped ends. http://www.tx7m.com/sponsors.php Maybe they changed their minds afterwards but the initial expectation was that LoTW was a perk of donating. It is apparent that some don't realize the massive costs of a major DXpedition. It's not simply two guys taking a boat with a rig and a wire antenna. Some of these operations cost tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars. And with that cost, there must be a means of recouping some of it. I have no problem with tossing a few bucks in the tip jar if I get a new one. Bureau is and likely will always be free. Many of them upload to LoTW after 1-2 years after the expedition ends anyway. But to expect everyone to spend tens or hundreds of thousands and then not expect to recoup some of those costs is just silly. 73 Ryan, N2RJ --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] ST0R-LOTW
My thanks to the many people who responded to my request for info re ST0R QSL's and LOTW credits. I appreciate your responses and info. John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] ST0R LOTW
Did anyone who QSL'd direct with an IRC to ST0R get their physical card in the mail and also a LOTW mathchup??? John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Antenna Analyzer
I need an antenna analyzer that provides impedance information. I have the predecesor to the MFJ-259B, and have been disappointed in it when the frequency of interest is near the band overlap areas of the various range segments. Works great mid range in those bands, but becomes unreliable near the edges of each band, and the overlap is not always sufficient to give reliable readings. I am considering the 259B, but fear the same kind of problems. Is there another instrument ouit there that isdesigned for ham radio, and not terribly expensive that you have experience with and feel is better than the 259B? Your response will be apprecaited. John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] DU1IST Email Address
Does anyone have an email addess for DU1IST?? John Owens - N7TK Celebrating over 50 Years in Ham Radio No. 1 Honor Roll --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] GlobalQSL
Looking for someone who has designed their own QSL card using GlobalQSL. When I initially tried to download and run their design software, it had problems running on my computer. I now have 2 card design that they created using photo image files that I sent them for the front and rear artwork, and then they produced the current design from that. I now want to edit those files to add additional information and don't know how to locate and modify the card text format. Since I did not create the design, the design files are not stored on my computer. I need help accessing those design files so I can not modify them. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] N1SNB
Am I the only one who is having trouble getting any kind of QSL response out of N1SNB. Three SASE mailings, and 2 emails and nothing back in return. A NIL would be fine if that is the case, but Nada. This is for a contact with him as VP9/N1SNB on 160SSB on January 24, 2009. Is he a SK or a stamp collector??? John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] OH1VR Email Address
If this was previously posted, my appologies. I need the email address for OH1VR. Help would be appreciated. Thank You John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Email addresses
Looking for email addresses for VK6DXI and JD1BMH. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] LOTW User's List
My thanks to the many who responded to my question of a site that lists LOTW user's. HB9BZA seems to be pretty universal and it should satisfy my needs. Thanks again and a Merry Xmas to all. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] DX Cluster
Is there a DX Cluster that I can access via the internet that allows me to make queries (eg. SH/DX FT5GA) and shows me an active cluster with DX Spots, etc. I need something that allows DX Cluster access/interaction while I am away from home using my laptop via wireless links. John Ownes - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] DX Cluster
My thanks to the many who responded to my email and request for ino on DX Clusters. I now have that problem solved and thank all of you for helping. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] DK9KX
Anyone have a current email address for Hans - DK9KX. The 2 year old one I have for him doesn't work. I want to thank him and others via him for their eventual success on getting 7O1YGF approved by DXCC. John Owens --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] IRC's
I have 9 current style IRC's for sale. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] working DXCC on CW
Jim: Enjoyed reading about your CW rebirth experiences. I have had similar ones. At 70YO now, I have been licensed since 1958. Originally, after getting my General Ticket in 1959, I preferred CW and got pretty good at it. Family and Career got in the way and I became inactive from 1963 until 2002 when I got back into the hobby with a good, modern station. I renewed my quest for DX. When they dropped the higher speed code speed in 2003 which grandfathered my General code proficiency to the Extra Class ticket, I took and passed the written exam. My CW proficiency was very poor at first, but I wanted to use the new 25Kc segments I now had at the bottom the popular bands. I bought a Morsematic keyer and awkwardely put my call sign in one memory location, and 599, TU in the other. I called it my 2 finger QSO. Over time, my CW ear got better and my CW fist improved so that I no longer do 2 finger QSO's. My operating speed is now around 25-30 WPM solid and I avoid SSB operations almost entirely. CW is now my preferred mode of operation. I love this mode and am glad circumstances forced me back into it. Thanks for sharing your experiences. John Owens - N7TK - Original Message - From: Jim Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com To: dx-chat@njdxa.org Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 10:24:07 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: [DX-CHAT] working DXCC on CW Saw where Ron notarius got his 15 meter DXCC. Thought I would share my experience on working CW DXCC. I was able to copy 20 wpm on paper in 1968 when I took my Extra and had to pass a 20 wpm sending test with a straight key, but gave up on CW after that. Last year I thought it was time for me to become a real DX'er by getting my CW DXCC. I have a Vibroplex paddle and a built-in keyer in my radio, but I can't send worth a darn with it at over 15 WPM (too old, no dexterity). So I have 3 CW memory slots in my radio and I programmed each one for a qso exchange, and I can set the CW speed with my radio. In my head I can copy my call and my report to at least 45 WPM and that's all I need to make a contact. The other day, VK9GMW copied my call, sent me my call and 5nn and he was S-0 on my radio. I wasn't sure I got him because he was ripping the code out so fast and he was so weak, but that contact was in his log. Making contacts this way has increased my code receiving speed, but I still can't send with the paddle. I am posting this info to maybe encourage someone to try CW regardless of their code ability. N4JA (got'em all on phone and mixed) --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] K6III Email
Thanks very much to the many who offered help on email adress for K6III. What a great bunch of guys. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] K6III email
Does anyone know where I can get the email address for K6III, Help would be appreciated. Thanks - John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] HL2IUA Email Address
I see you got you QSL route info, but you might consider the following site for looking up DX QSL routes. I have found it to be one of the best. John Owens - N7TK http://www.ik3qar.it/manager/man_result.php?call=3B7SPs=n -- Original message -- From: Malcolm Keown w...@vicksburg.com Does anyone have an email address for HL2IUA? The one on QRZ.com doesn't work. HNY de W5XX --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to imail...@njdxa.org In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Glorioso
Has anyone heard anything (rumor, inuendo, solid known facts, etc.) regarding the delayed or cancelled DXpedition to Glorioso Island. Theier website hasn't been updated since mid August, and I get no response from emails I sent to a couple of the operators that are supposed to be there when it happens. The August posting said they still hoped to do it before the end of this year (not far away). John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Glorioso
Thanks guys for the feedback. Concensus is that there is still no firm plan and that if they do decide to go ahead with it, the DX Bulletins will be notified. Thanks again for taking the time. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] YU7GMN V51AS QSL's
I have sent V51AS 5 QSL cards beween 12/99 and 3/02 without a reply. Most or all of these were likely sent via he bureau as I already have it confirmed for DXCC. I have 2 other contacts in 8/05 and 3/06 and I didn't send cards for these 40 and 80M contacts as I felt I was wasting my time. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Jerry Rappel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone received QSL's from YU7GWN, or V51AS? Thanks, Jerry WWØE --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] YU7GMN V51AS QSL's
I should have mentioned in my email re V51AS QSLing that I am aware that QRZ.com says to send only direct, but it has not always said that. It was modified this year. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Jerry Rappel [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone received QSL's from YU7GWN, or V51AS? Thanks, Jerry WWØE --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] A5100A
Zack: This op has a similar situation to the just concluded VU7 op. During the hours that HAMCAP said it was a possibility, they were on other bands. Mostly they seemed focused on 40, 80, and 160M, which means they were focused on EU, and not NA or SA. I even tried email to see if I could get them on 20M CW, and even though VU7SJ tried on a couple of nights, I never even heard them then or on any band or mode in the 2 weeks they were there. I have good antennas at 25m and good equipment. The only cluster spots I saw on them was from the East Coast NA. They were very few, had comments about weak signals, and didn't last long. HAMCAP says NA from my area (Pacific Northwest) should have its best chance for A5 around their sunset which is around 0z. and it says I should be able to work them SP on 17M and 20M around that time. So far, I have not seen them on those bands at that time. I hope one of theirs reads DX Chat and realizes this and changes the band/mod strategy on a few days jusgt to give NA W coast a chance.. I have a friend who has 300+ confirmed and needs this for a new one. A5 cluster spots are very rare here. I wish him luck. He had the same experience from his QTH in Dallas, TX with the VU7. I did read the A5100A website comments and they comment about difficult operating conditions and poor QSO rates. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Zack Widup [EMAIL PROTECTED] Has anyone in the USA on this group (well, let's even say North America) worked/heard A5100A yet? All the spots I've seen for them have been from Asia and EU and I haven't heard a peep from them. 73, Zack W9SZ --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] VP6DX
JOhn: I checked the list of sent QSL's on their website, and neither your call or mine is listed. They haven't updated the QSL status comment in about 1 month, but at that time they had sent to 11,363 stations out of the 38,502 that are in the log (I assume that to mean those that are requesting QSL cards). I would expect their log to contain more than 38.5K stations. It appears that more patience is in order. Hopefully we will both get our card. I know people whose call appeared on thte sent list long before they actually received the card. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: john [EMAIL PROTECTED] Same here, even though enclosed contribution. John K5MO At 12:30 PM 11/9/2008, Zack Widup wrote: Yes, I got mine some time ago too. Beautiful card! That's the reason I like paper cards. 73, Zck W9SZ On Sun, 9 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My thanks to the many folks who responded to my question about VP6DX QSL status. It seem all have had them for a month or so, and I haven't seen any postings on the DX-QSL reflector about recent cards. I guess I will never get one since I can't even get a response to emails re this. Thanks again. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] VP6DX
My thanks to the many folks who responded to my question about VP6DX QSL status. It seem all have had them for a month or so, and I haven't seen any postings on the DX-QSL reflector about recent cards. I guess I will never get one since I can't even get a response to emails re this. Thanks again. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] VP6DX
Does anyone know the status of the VP6DX QSL's. I get no response on email to their email address. My on-line QSL attempt bombed, and sent direct after that. John Owens - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Glorioso???
I am hearing or reading nothing regarding the proposed Glorioso DXpedition that has been tentatively scheduled for September 20 of this year. I know the dates and even the DXpedition plan are tentative, but it is still listed as a planned DXpedition with those dates in a couple of lists.Since the start date listed is only 2 weeks away, you would think someone (F5OGL??) would have updated us. Their website has no new information other than what has been on there for a few months now. Does anyone out there know anything about what is going on with this op??. John Owenss - N7TK --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
Re: [DX-CHAT] Radio Procedure-on phone
As I look at the calendar, I find myself celebrating the 50th anniversary of my first ham license. Hopefully that qualifies me to participate in this thread about MisQ's. I haven't heard anyone use QSL in lieu of Over, but I don't spend that much time on phone. The hobby needs new blood, so if we end up inheriting some old CBer's, welcome them on board and help them transition to the norms of this hobby. Without new blood, our numbers will dwindle to where the FCC will just farm out our spectrum. I do cringe a bit over terms like 10-4 good buddy, got your ears on, and I hear that. These will hopefully dissolve away over time. I would gladly tolerate the MisQ's if I could exchange them for removal of the frequency cops (up, up, up, up - one is enough), tuner upper's, or deliberate QRMer's who always know exactly where the good DXpedition operating frequencies are. It is like I am like trying to adapt to like changes that occur in our language like over time, if you get what I mean. This is still the greatest hobby out there, and it has been very good to me. I wish I could look forward to another 50 years, but that is unlikely. Stay tuned! John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Peter Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] At 11:08 AM 6/3/2008, David Yarnes wrote: You describe the problem very well. The only thing is, it's kind of like an accent. You can pick it up going in, and you tend to lose it going out. Habits are hard to break, but so long as we don't pick up on it ourselves, I think in time it will begin to fade. Personally hearing QSL instead of over doesn't bother me in the slightest, especially if the QSO is with someone who doesn't speak English very well. The more of an impediment the language barrier is the more inclined I am to follow the other op's lead; if he turns it over to me with QSL? I will use that with him if there's any doubt and if condx are marginal, etc. For stateside-to-stateside or between native English-speakers (from anywhere), I think it's silly, but to each their own. On local repeaters, though, it does grate on me, as does most other lingo when both sides are full-quieting and in-range of the repeater. When I elmer new hams I stress the importance of just speaking to other hams the same as you'd talk to non-radio friends on the phone. The one bit of cb-crap that sets my teeth on edge is on the side. Regards, Peter, W2IRT --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org --- --- To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the message body put either unsubscribe dx-chat or subscribe dx-chat This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org ---
[DX-CHAT] Re: [DX-NEWS] Re: Kosova
Jim: Now we have to hear from the ARRL DXCC folks on their position on this. An article I read on this said that licenses would be officially available for issue from April 14 on, so that might mean that any operatiion using the E7 call will not be official until after that date?? ARRL DXCC needs to state their position. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Jim Reisert AD1C [EMAIL PROTECTED] From the CQ Newsroom... Kosovo Added to CQ DX Awards Country List Effective 2/17/08 (Hicksville, NY) March 21, 2008 -- Kosovo is being added to the list of countries and territories recognized for CQ DX awards, effective immediately, CQ DX Awards Manager Billy Williams, N4UF, announced today. Verifications for contacts made on or after February 17, 2008 are acceptable for CQ DX Award credit. CQ DX Honor Roll members with 335 or more credits should update by May 31st for highest placement in Honor Roll listings. The new 339 entity maximum will appear on CQ DX Honor Rolls to be prepared in early June. CQ DX Honor Roll listings prepared in early April will be based on a 338 maximum count. All Kosovo contacts will count for field KN on applications for the CQ DX Field Award. Kosovo's status has been the subject of some controversy in the amateur radio community as well as the world community, as the ARRL declared that special operations from there on February 17 will count as Serbia, not Kosovo, in terms of DXCC credit. The United States and many European countries immediately recognized Kosovo's independence. However, Russia and China are opposed to it and Russia has threatened to veto any U.N. action to recognize Kosovo as an independent nation. We are aware that the ARRL has not yet added Kosovo to the DXCC list, explained CQ magazine Editor Rich Moseson, W2VU. The League says it is waiting for Kosovo to become a member state of the United Nations or be issued a callsign block by the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a U.N. agency. However, because of geopolitical issues far beyond the realm of amateur radio, it is unlikely that the United Nations or the ITU will act on Kosovo in the near future, even though the United States and many other countries have granted it recognition. Because it is CQ's policy to grant credit for contacts with 'new' entities as of the date that their status changes, Moseson continued, we have decided not to wait for U.N. action, but to follow the lead of the United States and other countries that have recognized Kosovo's independence, and to grant credit for contacts made with stations in Kosovo as of its independence day, February 17, 2008. (NOTE: This action does not affect the country list for the CQ WW DX Contest. CQWW rules state that its country list is composed of those entities on the DXCC list and the WAE (Worked All Europe) award list. If the WAE Committee decides to add Kosovo to its list, it will automatically be added to the CQWW list.) -- Jim Reisert AD1C/Ø, , http://www.ad1c.us -- Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] THE DXR is sponsored by the North Jersey DX Association. Please visit our website: http://www.njdxa.org/index.php To subscribe/unsubscribe, please send request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and allow a few hours for acknowledgement -- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] on line logs
Todd: Online logs preceeded K7C by quite a bit. They are the first op that posted real-time listing of your call when they were or had just worked you. That is on-line logs on steroids. The more they give us, the more be expect everyone to do it and are disturbed when they don't do it quite the way we want them to. The Clipperton gang limped back onto their boat a tired and beaten group of people. They suffered quite a bit. Can't we just cut them a little slack and let them do things when they have time to do them. If you are not in the log, there is no way of now trying to repeat a contact. Not all apparent contacts end up in the log. There is way too much wasted bandwidth on this topic. -- Original message -- From: Todd Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] Uh, on line logs were pretty much non existent before the last Kure Is Dxpedition, K7C. Maybe I am a little off but not by much. my point is that it is a fairly new feature that is a luxury a lot of people seem to think is compulsory of the DXpedition to provide. Hey it is nice to see if your Q's are in the log but what did you do 5+ years ago? Send in your card and hope for the best. Otherwise just wait until they post it and have fun with ham radio in the meantime. 73 de todd WB2ZAB Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
RE: [DX-CHAT] Directional CQs
Ron: Well, Chuck wanted to stir us and things up again, and we gladly accomodated him. The last time I checked, about half of the licensed hams are in JA land so Asia should be the main continent to aim directional CQ's at if they are in fact needing the country. I am sure the TX5 folks had the benefits of information from previous operations (FO0AAA, etc.) and the results of recent Needed lists to know where the needs are. What Chuck was critical of is exactly what they should do prior to and during an op. Know where the needs are, and try and help them out. Forget the dudes that are just trying to rack up band/mode slots. I know from experience, that they frequently only have short openings to certain continents, and that is when they have to limit their calls to them. The time might not match your needy time, but that is how things have to be done. I also know for a fact that they could always hear NA. After all, Clipperton is just off the coast of So Cal. Californian's could probably have worked them on 2M. And to the people who are openly critical of how or when they are doing things, or about the greatly shortened op, just be fair and really put yourself in their shoes. Few do. Look at how long it took under their poor circumstrances to just get the op started in the first place. I am sure they looked at the best and Worst case scenarios of what operating in that environment would be like, and unfortunately it was the Worst Case x 10. They made the best of a bad situation and hung in there longer than most of the critics would have. Repeated rain squalls, high winds, lightning and intense heat plagued them and caused the operation to be curtailed earlier than expected. Add to that the pesky and relentless crabs that abound on Clipperton that just won't go away, and tell me how you would have handled it. I think they gave us their best shot and ran the operation as well as we can fairly expect. Put a few extra bucks in the envelope. They deserve it. Another point that is beat to death is the issue of calling by the numbers. At any given time, you are going to be hearing certain areas best, and if you don't periodically go by the numbers, you are only going to be working stations from those areas since that is who you are hearing over eveyone else. Also, from a US standpoint, calling for 6's means you are listening for CA. Calling for 7's means you are listening for 6 states and that ought to keep that in mind when calling by the numbers. See what you stirred up Chuck (NPI). I suspect a grin. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Ron Notarius W3WN [EMAIL PROTECTED] I would say that at the moment, NA and EU contain the largest concentrations of active DX'ers. And when considering that the last two Pacific DXpeditions -- specifically, VP6DX Ducie and TX5C Clipperton -- basically had to shoot OVER NA to get to EU, AF AS... directional CQ's become a little more understandable. Is it entirely, 100% fair? No. But what is? There are many other factors involved than the ones Charles cites. TX5C, for one, stated that there would be a concentration on EU because of demand. I'm sure I'm not the only DX'er who sat in front of the radio, early to late evenings, hearing TX5C booming 599+40 on 80 40 meter CW, but unable to call because of those two simple letters, EU. But, so what? The bottom line is, as always, that the DXpedition fronts the funds, does the dirty work, arranges the shipping and transportation -- in short, takes the risks -- and as such, determines who how where they will call. That's the way the game is played. To be honest, I'm not going to sit here and gripe about the TX5C gang. Sure, I'd love to have worked them on more than one band, but I'm happy that I finally got them late Friday night on 30 -- and I almost missed that chance, too (no, the dog didn't eat my coax -- again. But I did have to take the wife in to the ER due to bronchitis; if they'd had to admit her, instead of sending her home to recover...). In many ways, this DXpedition was snake-bit, especially weather wise. To do as well as they did, with the weather-related delays and disasters they had to deal with, is commendable to them. To second guess their (or anyone else's) decisions on who to work and such is very close to being uncalled for. And frankly, I think if there were some penalties for the chronic morons who constantly call out of turn, on top of other people, on top of the DX, and call call call... a few of them might learn. Not many, but a few. And it's the chronic morons we have to worry about, along with the UP police and the like... not those who inadvertently make a mistake or give in to a moment's frustration. I've never heard of anyone guilty of a momentary lapse being put on a secret naughty list... though I wish a few of the chronics might make them! 73 -Original
RE: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
Don: That is not quite true. My last submittal was what they call a Hybrid submittal consisting of a few LOTW credits added to the main part of the submittal which is 92 QSO's that were field checked. My field checked paperwork was mailed within a couple of days of when they were field checked and when I applied for the partial LOTW credits, and I sit in the same queue that everyone else is in. That submittal was logged in on Dec 27, 2007 and is still waiting to be processed. Per their website, they are now processing applications that were logged in during the week of Dec 7, 2007 so I still have about 3 weeks to go. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Don [EMAIL PROTECTED] No difference. Everything, whether field checked or HQ checked or partial LOTW or full LOTW, gets processed along with all other submissions received at the same time. Now there is one trick to get you in sooner it eliminates a mail delay submit a partial LOTW submission. The minute you push the button on LOTW submit, you are in the queue with all the other paperwork(field checked) or HQ submitted (with card checking) or LOTW submits .they all get processed in order received. Don Ac7zg From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2008 8:08 AM To: dx-chat@njdxa.org Subject: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker would give a faster turn-around. Can anyone verify this by personal experience? Dave Miller W1GDQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money Finance. Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
David: You would think so. Given the large backlog lately, I made a very friendly suggestion to Bill Moore that they sort the submittals into 2 piles (Field Checked and Physical Cards), and have the bulk of their effort directed at Physical Card submittals. My belief was that the time required to unbundle a wad of cards, sort them into groups, physically review each card, enter the credit info, and then put that cards back into a bundle and send them on back to the sender requires quite a bit more time than entering the credit info from a field card check list. Even with a smaller effort, I would think that field checked card submittals would move along very quickly, and the backlog reduced more quickly. My suggestion was ignored. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] One would think that submitting your QSL's through a field checker would give a faster turn-around. Can anyone verify this by personal experience? Dave Miller W1GDQ [EMAIL PROTECTED] It's Tax Time! Get tips, forms and advice on AOL Money Finance. Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] Re: Card Checkers
One aspect of the problem hasn't been discussed before that I know of. A lot of the aps are people who were at the Top of the Honor Roll who are simply submitting an ap to cover a new entity that came along (FJ, etc.) and they want to get back on top. These aps are 1 or 2 cards at the most. Once a person reaches that pinnacle, I think it is fair that they get special consideration in how fast their ap is processed. I wouldn't mind being passed in the queue for this type of situation. That position of recognition is an honored position in our DXCC program and warrants special consideration. No, I am not at the Top of the Honor Roll. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: J Dyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Some of the grumbling has apparently worked its way upstream. I understand that a couple of more employees have now been assigned to checking cards at HQ. It will still take them a long time to work their way out of the hole. I made the LOTW portion of a dual application on March 6th. Without the additional help, probably will not hear back until June. We will see. John AE5B Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] 80M Rotatable Dipole Antenna
For Sale: Force 12 EF-180C Rotatable Dipole with 2 relay control box and balun - 83Ft long (Full 80M band coverage) New condition. Equvalent to Current Top of Line Version (Sigma 180 Magnum from Force 12) which sells for around $1200 without shipping. Asking $600 and prefer local pick up in Seattle, WA area. Shpping is not possible. Works very well on 30M also. Bagged me 120 countries on both bands in less than 3 years. John Owens - N7TK 425-745-0577 Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT]
The optional Powwer Supply cooling fan on my Alpha 87A Amplifier (externally mounted on rear of cabinet) needs to be replaced. The normal thing to do would be to replace it with another of the same brand, size, ratings. It is an EBM PABST Model 4580Z, and they are still available from a few suppliers. It is disconnected now, and it is amazing how much quieter the amp is without this fan. I have had other owners tell me they don't have one installed for that reason. I have also had others tell me then have one installed, but have a switch so that they can have it off most of the time, but on for high duty cycle modes like RTTY. Has anyone found an equivalent blower of the same size that is quieter, but that still does the job?? Since ETO/Alpha didn't install one on the amp to begin with, its need must be marginal. They advertise full time key down operation at 1500 watts so you have to wonder why it is needed in the first place. Your help and information would be appreciated. Thank You John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Kosovo
My thanks the many people who responded to my question about Kosovo DXCC status. Sounds like one of those WFWL situations. John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Kosovo
Even though Kosovo has declared independence, doesn't it have to pass additional criteria (UN Recog, ITU, etc.) before it become a legit new DXCC country?? John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] P5/4L4FN
Did anyone else see the cluster spots on P5/4L4FN yesterday at 2330Z by A5FU and K1TX. What is that all about. I naturally doubt its validity, and does anyone know these spotters and what their motive is?? John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] VP6DX - 160M SSB
Has anyone on this reflector worked VP6DX on 160M SSB. As near as I can tell, they have not been on yet. If you have had a contact with them or heard them on 160M SSB, can you tell me the time and date?? John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] VP6DX Log-Dupes
Mike: I am not sure it is correct to make that assumption about dupe contacts. If you have an ESP contact and the logs are not yet online, it is fairly normal to work them again (or for the first time?). Once the logs are online, dupes should not happen. My 20M CW,SSB,and RTTY contacts are not in the log yet even though they should be, but they said some contacts are not in the log, and they are working to correct the problem. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: rfman45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Among other things, the VP6DX log shows the stations with the greatest band/mode slots. However, just underneath the chart with the listing is a statement that dupes count negatively, apparently being deducted from the worked totals on the chart. Mike W2LO Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] VP6DX Log-Dupes
Ron: Want another level of confusion?? Enter the call letters in the online log check for one of the leaders of the band/mode slot leaders that hey list and you would expect to see all of those contacts spread out across the page?? No so. I did N4NN and it looked like he only worked 30M. there is something that I don't understand here. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Ron Notarius W3WN [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm sure that as time progresses, gaps will be filled in. But I'll admit: It's quite comforting to know that my 2 Q's are in the log! Interesting, though, that they show only 20 30 as bands available for RTTY. Or am I misreading that? 73, ron w3wn From: GERRY Date: 2008/02/14 Thu AM 09:10:12 CST To: dx-chat@njdxa.org Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] VP6DX Log-Dupes It also appears that the log is incomplete.  Maybe next upload will have more previous Qs. Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX ARRL DXCC Card Checker VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team (403) 251-6520 ve6lb (at) telus (dot) net www.qsl.net/ve6lb/ - Original Message - From: rfman45 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:38 AM Subject: [DX-CHAT] VP6DX Log-Dupes  Among other things, the VP6DX log shows the stations with the greatest band/mode slots. However, just underneath the chart with the listing is a statement that dupes count negatively, apparently being deducted from the worked totals on the chart.                                  Mike W2LO Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] DXpedition Expectations
Superbly stated! John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: rfman45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many of the problems already cited in these current threads are certainly contributing factors in today's chaotic world of pileups. Civility in general in society is woefully missing and its absence is also felt on the bands. Another contributing factor, I believe, is the very high set of expectations that DXpeditions set for themselves through advance publicity announcements. The high hopes of planners is evident in the press releases, requests for information on needed band/modes, planning for favorable propagation and times to various areas of the world, real-time online logs, etc. They, and we, want the very best possible results. While I and all DXers wish all DXpeditioners the very best success, planners may well be painting themselves into a corner in an effort to put their efforts in the best favorable light. DXpeditions to difficult-to-reach spots and/or places with problematic governments are, by definition, outside of the normal course of things and many unexpected events can therefore more easily present themselves, derailing even the best laid plans. It's not difficult to activate Spain; Heard Island is another matter. I am as enthusiastic as any when an expedition is announced; I have nothing but respect for our fellow hams who devote themselves to my favorite aspect of operating. However, the combination of the anticipation of a rare place being QRV, the talk of needing this or that band and the final event of the station coming on the air makes for an explosive mix that finally ignites in the inevitable fracas of the resulting pileup. I'm definitely in favor of advance publicity and any necessary fundraising, assistance, etc. but planners must be careful not to raise expectations too high and we, in the pileups, have to act more reasonably in our conduct and in what we expect. Best DX es 73, Mike W2LO Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] LOTW
Jim: I am pretty sure that VE7CC does not maintain the list, and relys on the HB9BZA list as the source. I think the VE7CC website mentions this down in the notes. I wrote HB9BZA about not being on his list with my new call, even though my log for that call has been in LOTW for quite a while. He did respond, and added me under the new call sign. I am equally sure that HB9BZA relies on the LOTW site for his list, and it was/is not up to date with my new call. I would expect them to be current on my call. John Owens (N7TK, Ex N7SEJ) -- Original message -- From: Jim Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] On the VE7CC network, if you are a member of LOTW, there is a plus sign in front of your call. Also, there is a LOTW checker that says yes or no to show if you are a member. I have emailed VE7CC and the HB9 who keeps the list, but neiher have answered as to why I am not listed and have ignored my emails. VE7CC and his network has an LOTW update every couple of days, but I'm not showing up. Does anyone know how to get me listed? Jim N4JA Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] logs
Jim: There is nothing complicated about LOGGER32 with regard to exporting/importing files and logs. First, I would recommend you direct your question to the LOGGER32 reflector and I am sure Geoff or one of the other guys will help you with your problem. I originally converted my logs that resided on LOGPLUS to the ADIF format and then loaded them onto LOGGER32 with few problems. I have been using LOGGER32 for many years now and have never had a problem downloading to LOTW, or converting the logs to Cabrillo for submittal to contests. I responded to your previous question along these lines and never head back from you. I would recommend exporting a few of your log files to a save area and then inspect them. I sent you examples of what a log file in ADIF format should look like, so that you can check them to see if they look lilke they should. If you need another example of the ADIF log file format, I would be happy to supply it If you want to forward a couple of your ADIF log format files to me to look at, please do so. If your exported log ADIF files are in the correct ADIF format and content, then they should process by the LOTW s/w to create the .tq8 format file for input to LOTW. I am forwarding this response to the LOGGER32 reflector as a prelude to you getting help from them if needed. I definitely would hate to see you leave LOGGER32 over this. It is a super and simple logging program that is pretty hard to beat. There is some siimple solution to this. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Jim Abercrombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am computer illiterate when it comes to converting log files. I cannot get logger32 to load my logs into LOTW. I keep getting an error message saying to download files from All operators, Jim, or N4JA. Whenever I try any of those three, It says there are no logs for those operators.. Is there a free logging program that is not so complicated that all I have to do is click on export files to LoTW that isn't do darn complicated. I don't want to buy a program that may turn out to be more complicated than the ones i am trying to use. I was able to load the log in dxkeeter to logger32, but I don't see a way to load old qso's and put old dates and times in logger 32. Well I don't guess it matters if i cannot export logs from logger32 to LOTW. Help please! |I have downloaded 300+ qsos to LOTW but I cannot do an update. Those logs were loaded from DXkeeper, but I was just hacking and I don't know what I did. Jim from computers for dummies. N4JA Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] 2003 QSL Card
I just had a strange experience. A QSL card that I sent G3XAQ in 2003 via the bureau for a contact on 40M CW on 4/13/03 was returned to me via the US Postal Service. It was outside the original bureau envelope it was sent in, and did not have an address or stamp on it for that reason. It has a PO cancellation in the area where the stamp would normally be, and was cancelled in New York, NY. The cancellation is currerent (Jan 2008). It has marks and crimps on it that indicate there was a processing problem somewhere along the way. John Owens ( N7TK) Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] 2003 QSL Card Return
As a followup to my earlier email on this, I heard back from G3AXQ that I am the second person in a week to report the same problem. Stranger yet. John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Re: [DX-NEWS] JD1BMH
It is just as bad even when the DX is working split and listening up 5-15Kc. He will clearly call a particular station, and if you tune up the listening spread, you will hear hundreds of stations still calling even though the DX is on a particuar listening freq and wanting only that call. How ignorant is that. Shame on anyone doing that stupid stunt, and since you are giving your call, everyone knows who you are that are doing it.. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Greg - N4CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD1BMH had a nice signal on 80 meters this morning and a large NA pile-up. I listened to the JD and the pile-up and I'm getting more concerned about a habit that I see from many hams -- including some well known DX'ers. Regardless of what station the DX calls, almost everyone keeps calling. If a guy answers W9F? and your call is N4CCdon't transmit! (I used my call so I wouldn't offend anyone, but it applies to everyone.) Can we not exercise a bit of patience and courtesy on the bands any more? This practice seems especially bad in big pile-ups. I have never seen it help anyone get through, either. It just delays everyone while the DX asks for repeats because of the QRM. Let's do better in 2008. Busting a big pile-up can be fun -- but only if everyone remains courteous in the process. HNY and 73 de Greg-N4CC (stepping off soap box) -- Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] THE DXR is sponsored by the North Jersey DX Association. Please visit our website: http://www.njdxa.org/index.php To subscribe/unsubscribe, please send request to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and allow a few hours for acknowledgement -- Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Old QSL Cards
I would like to find one of my old QSL cards as a Novice from Mid 1958 to around 1960 with the call of WV6AJE from Culver City, CA. If you were active during this time, would you please check your log to see if I worked you. If you have one of my QSL cards, I would love to have a scan of it, or the actual card. . John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] FJ: Canned Worms (long)
Shelby: This topic gets regurgetated periodically and the answer will be the same as before. Froom Hans (DK9KXA or DK9XX?) who was part of the group that went there: No documentation was sent to DXCC because they never got actual paper confirmation of permission to operate there. They had verbal permission. Written permission has be be obtained directly from the Ministry of PTT. In spite of numerous letters, the Ministry of PTT would not send the written documentation to back up their verbal permission. As far as I know, that is still the case. They did their operation in Sanaa, in plain sight and with the knowledge of the local chief of secret police who monitored their opertion and did not complain. They had substantial antenna systems installed which made it very obvious what was going on. It was 400 yards away from the HB9 and DL embassies. After 9 days of operation and 35K QSO's, they were asked to cease operation and leave the country which is what they did. No one was arrested and no equipment was confiscated. The beef is with the Ministry of PTT for failure to back up their verbal permission with the ARRL required documentation and until they do, it will not be recognized by DXCC. Per Hans, the operation was stopped because a ham radio group complained about it and caused its demise. They know who the people are. The DXpedition group is not to blame. They had every reason to believe that they had proper permission for the operation. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Shelby Summerville [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7O1YGF remains in pending documentation status. As is, at least for me, ZB2/4O3AL. I fail to understand, if an operation is legitimate, why the operator(s) are reluctant to send documentation? HNY to all C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms
My log shows it to have been P51BH. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Ronald Loneker Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wasn't that the call used in P5/OH2AM ?? GERRY wrote: It's clear that OH2AM is a club call and therefore Class C. call name address zip city class @sral.fi email OH0B OH0R OH2R OH0AM OH2AM OH-DX-Ring Ry PL 73 02381 ESPOO C http://oh-callbook.sral.fi/?call=oh2amname=addr=zip=city=class=lang=EN It's clear that the CEPT regulations does not include class C in their OH allowed CEPT users. Appendix 2: http://www.ero.dk/doc98/Official/Word/TR6101E.DOC Gerry VE6LB - Original Message - *From:* Zack Widup *To:* dx-chat@njdxa.org *Sent:* Friday, December 28, 2007 5:00 PM *Subject:* RE: [DX-CHAT] FJ Can of worms On Fri, 28 Dec 2007, Ron Notarius W3WN wrote: A very interesting document. I noticed that one item appeared to be missing... when the first complaints surfaced, one of the charges was that of possibly illegal entry to FJ via a privately chartered boat, as I recall. No mention of that in the letter. As a certain fictional television character used to say, Fascinating. The charge over the alleged misuse of the club callsign for the DXpedition is probably the most serious complaint. But as meticulous as Martti usually is on planning his jaunts, I find it hard to believe that this detail was overlooked. And, of course, nobody's perfect, so it may have been a true oversight on his part. I wondered about that myself. As you said, Fascinating! But... was a license issued, and if so, what call was on it? If FJ/OH2AM was on the license -- does that make the operation invalid? I'm sure that's one of the things the DXAC and DXCC desk will get to iron out, a task I don't envy them. I was under the impression that as a CEPT country, anyone from another CEPT country could just go there and operate. I could just go and operate as FJ/W9SZ. The main contention seems to be now about the callsign used after the FJ/. Having said that... I've got to tell you, gang, that this is one of a string of disturbing precedents that we've seen over the last few years. Sort of a DX'ing version of NIMBY. Recall all the complaints from the HP hams over the H8A trip a few years back, for one (specifically over the actual call on the license)? And there have been others along the same lines, which many of you know much more about than I ever will. I can't blame some of the resident FJ hams from feeling that their triumph got trumped, that their own plans to inaugurate the new entity in their own way got pulled out from under them. Under similar circumstances, I might feel the same way. But whatever happened (I ask rhetorically) to good sportsmanship? 73, ron w3wn So where are they? Why aren't they doing a similar operation when they know how much in demand the entity still is? 73, Zack W9SZ Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org -- Ronald Loneker Sr.- KA2BZS #1DXCC Honor Roll - 9BDXCC A-1 Op - QCWA http://www.cwforever.com Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] Cluster node for US spots of dx only?
I think all clusters allow you to set the filters you want in place. Not all clusters use the same software so the command syntax will be different between nodes. The node should be able to help you do this. GOOD logging software like the freeware LOGGER32 allow you to control this locally so that all spots come in from your node source, but are filtered according to your filter selections before being placed on the DX SPOTS page which is what you monitor. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: James Nipper [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have been away from dx-ing a while, and have not used the Dx Cluster system in several years.I would like to find a node that only shows spots made by U.S. stations. Are there any left that do this? Yes, I know that I could set filters, but for the moment that is not what I want. Yes, I know that some folks like to know when G-land can hear DL-land, but that doesn't interest me, so I see no need for the ten thousand spots per hour that don't pique my interest. I am looking for a Dx node that only shows dx spots made by USA hams. Can anyone tell me of any please ?? Thanks !! 73 de Jim K4PYT Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Global QSL
Is ther anyone with experience using GlobalQSL that is willing to talk about it off the reflector?? John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Propogation
Looking through some old paperwork, I found some DX cluster printouts that showed a Solar Flux Index of 239 on Oct 26 of the last cycle peak. I found another on October 23 showing 202, 0, 0. We have a long ways to go to get there again, and they are predicting one of the best cycles ever perhaps. Look what we have to look forward to in the next 6-8 years. QRPers will be working anythng and everything on 10M when it peaks again. John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
RE: [DX-CHAT] 7O
Ron: All good information. You and Osten have a lot more info that I have been privy to. This all makes it obviious that it is not a clear cut situation on how to get properly licensed in Yemen first place, and then get the necessary documentaion to get DXCC certification. If it is difficult for a DXpedition to deal with, imagine how difficult it is for the ARRL to establish a clear cut, stable set of rules to follow in order to get operating licenses and permission, and then the necessary documentation to get DXCC cert. In cases like this, I think the DXCC rules situation has to have a fair amount of flexibility in its interpretation. Lets hope the G4HCL and other upcoming 7O ops are a bit more successful in this regard. That is why we are talking about this to help understand and aid the process. John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Ron Notarius W3WN [EMAIL PROTECTED] Well, I don't know about 7O7AA or 7O8AA (and yes, Osten, I do recall your email from back in March, obviously you have more information at your disposal than I do). Things may have changed after those licenses were issued, and especially after the two Yemens merged back into one country. Or the Aden Branch may have had the authority at one time and does not anymore. Or they overstepped their authority the first time or two and was approval from the Saana may have come retroactively, something they no longer wish to do. I could continue to speculate, but we may never know. As far as the documentation problem with 7O1YGF goes, remember two things: (1) The 7O1YGF team advertised quite often prior to the DXpedition that they had a license. Or at least that they had permission. This was re-iterated during and after the DXpedition... but the elusive license or permission to operate never appears to have either (a) been put on paper, and/or (b) been seen in the light of day by anyone outside of the DXpedition. (2) The 7O1YGF team has never submitted ANY documentation to the DXCC desk to have the operation approved for DXCC credit. Just some photos that were given to N7NG at Friedrichshafen. Let us all also bear in mind that this has happened before. There are more than a few operations by EU ops from Central America that have not been approved due to lack of documentation. It does make one wonder... And yes, I recall the story about Vlad too. Funny that they would tell him no license had ever been issued except the one to the Sultan of Kuwait, yet we know of licenses (or at least permission to operate -- same thing but technically not quite? Are they hair splitting?) that have been issued, such as 7O/OH2YY. So one wonders what the real story is... again, we may never know. 73 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Osten B Magnusson Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 1:41 PM To: Zack Widup; dx-chat@njdxa.org Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] 7O As far as I know the no good license for 7O1A was issued by the Aden Branch of The Yemen Telecom, and the head office in the capital Saana said that the Aden Branch was not authorized to issue licenses. BUT also the 7O8AA and 7O7AA operations took place from Aden (according to the information I have). Maybe also 7O1AA. Can the documentation problem for 7O1YGF be as simple as they also had authorization only from the Aden Branch? Vlad, UA4WHX, was in Saana in early 2005 but did not operate as he could not get a license - he told us that the ministry said that only one license had been issued, for The Sultan of Kuwait, but he never used it. Search Google UA4WHX + Yemen and you will find a lot of information. 73/DX de Osten SM5DQC [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Zack Widup To: Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2007 7:08 PM Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] 7O I really don't know much about that country's government. Are there different factions struggling for power, or claiming authority in different areas? Is it possible some faction claims it can issue licenses, but in fact it isn't considered the real agency who issues licenses? 73, Zack W9SZ On Sat, 11 Aug 2007, KR4DA wrote: If you visit the Yemem tourist center just about anybody can go there. They have 5 star hotels etc.. But what I don't get is who is the official that the ARRL wants a receipt from of being there and counting as official. They will tell you it doesn't count. Tell me what you need from who to count. I have worked 7O1A and 7O1YGF I need 7O as a one of two left to be acceptable by ARRL. Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback,
[DX-CHAT] DXCC Yearbook
In looking back at past issues of the DXCC Yearbook, I find that the 1993 (my first year in it), the DXCC Listing was 19 pages long. The 2002 issue had 27 pages to the list. It is obvious that participation has grown quite a bit over the years, and you would think that ARRL DXCC would enjoy this and want to nurture it. DXCC Challenge is something new that they came up with and started promoting heavily around 2004. Its 12 pages replaced the DXCC listing in that issue, and the DXCC Listing has never returned. The DXCC Challenge list has now been removed and replaced by the 5 page 160M DXCC List (what do we need this for with its limited number of participants). The rest of the 32 page Yearbook contains DXpedition related articles like we get every month in How's DX. There are many DX reports that contain this kind of information and we don't need the DXCC Yearbook to just get more of it. Let Bernie do it in his column, and put the DXCC Lists back in the Yearbook. It is what the Yearbook was all about a few years ago, and it should be returned to that status. Sincerely John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
Re: [DX-CHAT] DXCC Yearbook
Mike: I couldn't have expressed it better than you have. DXCC has a 40+year (that I know of) history and it is the pinnacle of DX awards. I don't participate in DXCC Challenge as it takes way to much time to make a dent in the standings. More power to those who do like it. I have, however, put 15 years of my life pursuing a high position on the DXCC List, and many others have put many more years in the same pursuit. Some people become SK's before the get to the top of it, and that may well happen to me. When you become a SK and your call sign ceases to be active, you fall off the list. It is a badge of honor to be high on the list, and the ultimate distinction is to reach the top. That remains my goal. The DXCC List in the Yearbook is our report card in this pursuit and it, if nothing else, should be in the DXCC Yearbook. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. You and I are not alone in this feeling. Sincerely John Owens - N7TK -- Original message -- From: Mike(W5UC) Kathy(K5MWH) [EMAIL PROTECTED] AMEN John: Last year when I complained that the annual DXCC listings were missing, a part of the explanation I got verbally from a particular League official, was that the DX Challenge is now the premier DX Award in the league DX program. Pardon my French, but BS. That's a matter of opinion. Challenge may possibly be attracting more attention, but Challenge is the newest big thing. I would expect that there would naturally be a flurry of new activity there. DXCC, however, is still the original, and IMHO, the most prestigious of the DX awards. (don't challenge me with the merits of all of your favorite awards; I don't want to hear it) I also, don't know who,when, decided that the Yearbook needed to look like Parade Magazine in my Sunday paper, with a lengthy review of all of the news I saw on Fox News this past week. Please, just take it back to it's original form and leave it alone. It really would be nice if people would quit trying to discover a way to destroy the few remaining traditions we have left. I'm so sick I want to puke from operators ending correspondence on air communications with 73's. The term is 73; please learn what it means, and use it correctly, and please leave the Yearbook tradition alone 73, Mike, W5UC age treachery will overcome youth skill http://www.suddenlink.net/pages/w5uc/ Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] Glorioso (FR/G)
Has anyone heard anything on the grapevine regarding a possible DXpedition to Glorioso in the near future? John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] BERU
I was unable to find this contest listed anywhere, including QST. What is BERU?? John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] BERU
My thanks to the very many who told me what BERU meant. Too bad the contest lists don't identify it that way. Thanks again guys. John Owens - N7TK Subscribe/unsubscribe, feedback, FAQ, problems http://njdxa.org/dx-chat To post a message, DX related items only, dx-chat@njdxa.org This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
[DX-CHAT] ER QSL's
Moldovia is one of the better Russian Breakup federations for getting QSL cards from. I have 7 confirmed out of 10 sent and 15 worked, most of those via the bureau. That is pretty good for a BU Federation. John Owens - N7SEJ
[DX-CHAT] 3Y9SDA
Does anyone know the country ID for 3Y9SDA?? My loggin S/W seems to think it it Bouvet Island, which is doubtful. There is usually at least a trumpet blast when en entity like Bouvet gets activated. Haven't heard one yet. John Owens
