Re: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp
I opted to purchase the P50VDG GasFet preamp from Advanced Receiver Research, which worked fine. Somehow I blew the Gasfet so have to repair it (uses mgf-1302). Recent reports from a local net are that I am received S9+ while I struggle to hear the local (70-mi away) station running the same power (100w). The K3 even with PRE turned on is not very good on 6m and an external preamp does wonders. I found it best to run the K3 with PRE off if using an external preamp. 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 == BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com EME: 50-1.1kw?, 144-1.4kw, 432-QRT, 1296-?, 3400-? DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@gmail.com Kits made by KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com/kits.htm == __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp
I build this: http://www.ham-radio.com/n6ca/50MHz/50appnotes/U310.html Works fine - much cheaper! Vy 73 de Svend, OZ7UV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] 1A0C
01.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Tony Estep: 1A0C is now up and running, and they have one of those cool on-line logging setups wherewith your QSO appears in their on-line log within seconds after the last dit dies away. Great poetic words Tony! It might be a little bit hard for hams outside the european wall... The team of 1A0C might have some issues with their online-log. My band slots appear not in the right order. But they do a great job even outside their ham-activities! So please donate! regards Holger - DL9HDA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
Subreceiver! Adding LP-PAN or a similar SDR plus Skimmer will give you a useful picture of the [small, but often big-enough] band segment, plus callsign and 599 decoding. RObert said: I have never used either a panadapter or a sub-receiver, so I'm a newbie in this area. I use CW almost exclusively, and I chase DX and enter contests [less so in the past, more in the future]. I have a small pistol station with no allusions of being a band master. Question: which of these two options might I find more useful for my station and operating preferences? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3 more than the second receiver. One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is super awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are sporadic. I wouldn't operate 6m without it. I use the second receiver on 6m with my new SteppIR 6m passive and my 6m stack because I can have the antennas pointed in different directions which is super cool. If I had to choose between one or the other I would go with the Panadapter or P3. Keith AG6AZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
Hi Phil, You should have some idea of when you might want to use diversity reception. If you do then the filters that would be in use on your main RX should be duplicated (and matched) in the sub RX. Likewise, you should really give some thought to when you might use your sub RX. I have five filters in my main RX and four in my sub RX. I now believe I only really needed 3 in my sub RX and one day if I have reason to remove my sub RX I'll take out the filter I don't use and sell it. If you never plan on having multiple antennas you might never operate diversity. In that case you won't need matched filters in your sub RX. But that move could lower the resale value of your K3. More food for thought. 73, Mike K2MK Phillip Shepard wrote My understanding is that diversity receive works best with matched receiver topologies. Should the subRx have the same filter array as the main Rx (bandwidths and types)? If the main Rx has 8-pole 2.8, 1.8 and 0.4 kHz filters, should the subRx mimic that? Thank you for the enlightenment. 73, Phil, NS7P -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-panadapter-or-subreceiver-tp7558492p7558543.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Diversity receive w/o dedicated receive antenna
Your second antenna does NOT need to be resonant to receive, either by itself or with another in diversity mode. My receive antenna is seasonal so I have employed antennas for other bands for receive when it is not up. While a non resonant will not present as strong a signal, it also will not present as strong a noise. The S/N ratio is unchanged but the human ear seems to hear better when the noise is reduced. I typically use an antenna for the next band (even harmonic). 73, Jim W5QM __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
I tend to 2nd that recommendation. I have both the P3 and a 2nd receiver in my K-3. I have the same filters for the sub receiver as the main receiver, although, I have never used diversity receive. I think the P3 is particularly helpful to check on band activity before you decide whether or not to switch to that band. For that, the 2nd receiver can obviously be useful. However, as far as actual operating is concerned. If I encounter a DX station using split I find that using RIT is sometimes quicker and faster than setting up a 2nd receiver and using split. Of course, if the split being used is wider than what is available with RIT then, of course you have no choice. All of this depends upon your operating habits. But I think it is a good idea to consider a P3 1st and then the 2nd receiver if you find that could be useful. By the way, I find the P3 much more useful than LP pan. It does not tie up the computer which I can then use for other things such as logging or station co ntrol. Part of that preference was caused by the fact that I did not make the If gain modification to my K-3 and so the LP display showed very low amplitude signals which were often not very useful. That of course was my fault. I find the P3 has enough gain that the if was not required. That is not an issue with newer K-3s which already have the higher gain Incorporated on the board. Bruce-W8FU On Jul 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Keith Heimbold wrote: I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3 more than the second receiver. One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is super awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are sporadic. I wouldn't operate 6m without it. I use the second receiver on 6m with my new SteppIR 6m passive and my 6m stack because I can have the antennas pointed in different directions which is super cool. If I had to choose between one or the other I would go with the Panadapter or P3. Keith AG6AZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
I do not have a P3 but I do have the subreceiver in my K3. I have found it totally indispensible. How many times have you hit the wrong VFO when going back and forth in a split pileup only to draw the ire of half of the world and being called many descriptive adjectives? Being able to have the second receiver in my right ear and the main one in my left is extremely nice. Listening to the DX station and having the ability to immediately tune the second VFO to where the DX is listening is priceless. 73, Tim Herrick, KQ8M Charter Member North Coast Contesters k...@kq8m.com K3 Serial #5934 AR-Cluster V6 kq8m.no-ip.org User Ports: 23, 7373 with local skimmer, 7374 without local skimmer Server Ports: V6 3607, V4 Active 3605, V4 Passive 3606 -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bruce McLaughlin Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:24 AM To: Keith Heimbold Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; eric manning Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver I tend to 2nd that recommendation. I have both the P3 and a 2nd receiver in my K-3. I have the same filters for the sub receiver as the main receiver, although, I have never used diversity receive. I think the P3 is particularly helpful to check on band activity before you decide whether or not to switch to that band. For that, the 2nd receiver can obviously be useful. However, as far as actual operating is concerned. If I encounter a DX station using split I find that using RIT is sometimes quicker and faster than setting up a 2nd receiver and using split. Of course, if the split being used is wider than what is available with RIT then, of course you have no choice. All of this depends upon your operating habits. But I think it is a good idea to consider a P3 1st and then the 2nd receiver if you find that could be useful. By the way, I find the P3 much more useful than LP pan. It does not tie up the computer which I can then use for other things such as logging or station co ntrol. Part of that preference was caused by the fact that I did not make the If gain modification to my K-3 and so the LP display showed very low amplitude signals which were often not very useful. That of course was my fault. I find the P3 has enough gain that the if was not required. That is not an issue with newer K-3s which already have the higher gain Incorporated on the board. Bruce-W8FU On Jul 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Keith Heimbold wrote: I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3 more than the second receiver. One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is super awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are sporadic. I wouldn't operate 6m without it. I use the second receiver on 6m with my new SteppIR 6m passive and my 6m stack because I can have the antennas pointed in different directions which is super cool. If I had to choose between one or the other I would go with the Panadapter or P3. Keith AG6AZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
I guess that one can find advantages of P3, LP-Pan or something else depending on circumstances. The main advantage of P3 is that it is standalone. No hassles of software installation, instantaneous turn on, and excellent integration with K3. But since the P3's the firmware is proprietary, it is modified dependent on Elecraft's priorities. For instance, a feature I am missing the most in P3 is noise blanker. Under heavy power noise, K3's noise blanker can work pretty well but P3's screen is covered by noise. In contrast, the noise blanker on SDR-IQ was extraordinary, allowing to see weak signals in the present of heavy noise. At least two solutions here: 1) request a feature from Elecraft, or 2) call the power company. I had many of software crashes with SDR-IQ. Perhaps no longer with new computer and new drivers but I have lost enough time... To tell the truth, the support of LP-PAN is more helpful than the support of SDR-IQ. Ignacy, NO9E -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558547.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
I don't know if it has been said, but with a K3, no subreceiver and an LP-Pan, it is possible to monitor the audio on both VFOs simultaneously. 73, Dick - KA5KKT __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] N-Gen for sale
I am selling a built N-Gen with the battery for $45 including shipping. Please respond off of the reflector. 73 Alan W1HYV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
I use an SDR-IQ on the i-f output of my K3. I use LP-Bridge to share data between the K3, SpectraVue, DXBase logging and/or N1MM. Additionally, with a laptop/SDR-IQ combination I have a nice little standalone receiver for travel use, although the sensitivity is poor without something like an active antenna. Disclaimer: I once owned an LP-PAN but sold it, I've never owned a P3 although I played with a preproduction one once. Wes Stewart N7WS --- On Mon, 7/2/12, Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net wrote: In another post I ask about sub-receiver versus panadapter. Here, a question about type of panadapter. My station occupies a very small space, and adding the P3 would strain the real estate. So, I've been looking at other panadapter possibilities that use the computer screen for display. What sort of useful comparisons can be made between the P3 and the LP-Pan box/software? Are there any other panadapter options that I should consider? Thanks for any and all opinions. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
Note: The noise blanker in NaP3 works on the display as well. Larry N8LP Ignacy wrote I guess that one can find advantages of P3, LP-Pan or something else depending on circumstances. The main advantage of P3 is that it is standalone. No hassles of software installation, instantaneous turn on, and excellent integration with K3. But since the P3's the firmware is proprietary, it is modified dependent on Elecraft's priorities. For instance, a feature I am missing the most in P3 is noise blanker. Under heavy power noise, K3's noise blanker can work pretty well but P3's screen is covered by noise. In contrast, the noise blanker on SDR-IQ was extraordinary, allowing to see weak signals in the present of heavy noise. At least two solutions here: 1) request a feature from Elecraft, or 2) call the power company. I had many of software crashes with SDR-IQ. Perhaps no longer with new computer and new drivers but I have lost enough time... To tell the truth, the support of LP-PAN is more helpful than the support of SDR-IQ. Ignacy, NO9E -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558549.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Diversity receive w/o dedicated receive antenna
I totally agree with Jim. Diversity receive is the only way I use the second rx, and I never invested one cent in extra antennas for the second receiver. For use with my horizontally polarized main antenna I just connect the second rx to my existing vertical, which works fine even on bands that it is not designed for. At Field Day I put up a BuddiPole vertical with no coil and no attempt whatsoever to tune to any band, with a single wire counterpoise of random length. If I didn't have the vertical at home, or the BuddiPole for the field, I would just use two pieces of wire and suspend whichever way is convenient. However, assuming the antennas are not far from each other, it is important that they have opposite polarizations. To have the second receiver and not use it for diversity is a tragedy. After you set the rf gain on the subreceiver to get a decent balance between the two receivers, you will find that the second receiver often allows you to hear a station in the second rx that is temporarily unreadable in the main receiver due to qsb. Also, in crowded band conditions the different stations within the receiver passband will arrive with varying polarizations, and you can hear them spatially separated like orchestra instruments on a stereo sound stage. This is helpful both for ssb and cw. Sometimes it can even help with multiple cw signals on the exact same frequency. 73, Erik K7TV Your second antenna does NOT need to be resonant to receive, either by itself or with another in diversity mode. My receive antenna is seasonal so I have employed antennas for other bands for receive when it is not up. While a non resonant will not present as strong a signal, it also will not present as strong a noise. The S/N ratio is unchanged but the human ear seems to hear better when the noise is reduced. I typically use an antenna for the next band (even harmonic). 73, Jim W5QM __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
We used to compare LP-PAN / NaP3 to the P3, but the apt comparison now is with P3SVGA unless the user plans to use a 4 monitor on his PC ;-) NaP3 is not a resource hog. I am running it on PCs ranging from a P4 to an Atom to an i3. It runs fine on all of them. The E-MU 0204 can be a hog on older PCs, but you really have to try to find a PC that slow today. Larry N8LP Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote Here's the direct link: http://www.telepostinc.com/P3_comp.html It's there plain as day about 1/3 of the way down the main LP-Pan page: http://www.telepostinc.com/LP-PAN.html Note - the comparison is between LP-Pan with NaP3 software and P3SVGA. LP-Pan/NaP3 is very computer intensive (PowerSDR is a resource hog) which is not adequately disclosed and the price comparisons are very biased by the cost of the SVGA option which increases the price of the base P3 by nearly 40%. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 7/2/2012 10:42 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: Could you give us the URL for the comparison. I've been on the page, but I can't find it. Thanks and 73, Guy. On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Ignacy lt;no9e@gt; wrote: N8LP on his website has a very comprehensive and IMHO honest comparison of P3 and LP-PAN. In snapshot, if you are strained on cash, good in computers, and occasional software problems are not an issue, use LP-PAN. If reliability and ability to change parameters fast via buttons are more important, P3 is good. I used SDR-IQ but eventually bought P3. Ignacy -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558497.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558552.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
LP-Bridge is not intended to support every command that every app might use, but it supports 99% of the commands that most people use, and uses very few resources. The biggest issues come with macros and commands that require critical response timing, but LP-Bridge's ability to limit traffic to the rig compared to splitters that just send everything from all the apps to the rig is a big advantage. There are some rules that have to be obeyed when using multiple apps so that they don't work against each other and confuse the rig. LP-Bridge enforces those rules at the expense of supporting 100% of the commands from a given app. In some cases, LPB2 can be more useful if one app needs complete control and the others can live with the dozen most used commands. One source of many problems is the use of USB to serial adapters. You have to be careful to use a good brand with the proper drivers, especially with win7 64-bit. Larry N8LP Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote NaP3 is not the only software required with LP-Pan. Most installations require LP-Bridge or some other software port sharing package to allow both NaP3 and a logging program to share control of the K3. Several logging packages fail to work properly with LP-Bridge to the point that their developers refuse to accept bug reports if LPB is running. The resource load of LP-Pan must include both NaP3 and LPB as well as the interference they cause to logging software. There is no such problem with the P3. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 7/2/2012 11:36 PM, Tony Estep wrote: On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV lt;lists@gt; wrote: ...LP-Pan/NaP3 is very computer intensive... == On my 2009-vintage Asus laptop, running LP-Bridge and LP-Pan increases CPU usage by about 15 percentage points. With MixW2 and VE7CC running and a web browser open, total CPU load is about 30%. I have an outboard 23 monitor configured as an extended desktop, and am using ASIO drivers for an EMU 0202. The NaP3 window is 13 1/2 wide, of which 12 is the panadapter picture of the band. There is enough CPU capability to display videos at full-screen size on the laptop screen while the rest of the stuff is running. Tony KT0NY __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558554.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting
It appears that the amplifier keying line is always set to operate as QSK with no delay. This keying signal dose not follow the delay that is set for the VOX on CW. The only way that I have found to keep the keying line closed is to put the KX3 into xmit with the front panel button. Will an adjustable delay for the amplifier keying signal be added in the future? Howard AE3T __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting
In cw mode: Make sure QSK is not on. Make sure VOX is on. Push in and hold the speed control till CW n.nn appears. Rotate the speed control to set the drop out time you want. Anything up to 2 seconds can be set. Let us know if this doesn't work for you. Rick K2XT It appears that the amplifier keying line is always set to operate as QSK with no delay. This keying signal dose not follow the delay that is set for the VOX on CW. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
Some comments that may be helpful for both threads about the P3: I have two K3s in an SO2R contest configuration. The K3 I use mostly for running has an LP-Pan and NaP3. I just installed the pre-amp option in my LP-PAN, and it works well, but I haven't done a contest with it yet. The run K3 also has a SubRX that I use almost exclusively for Diversity reception. The radio I use mostly for SP has a P3 (no SVGA card) and no SubRX. Both panadapter solutions work well, but I have a preference for the P3, especially for SP. The main reason is that the P3 display seems sharper and more responsive to me. This will sound odd, but the signals on LP-PAN/NaP3 seem slightly fat and slow, and the screen display seems more chaotic that it does on the P3. It could be that the display is just that much bigger, but I don't know. I've not been able to make the NaP3 display look as good or respond as well as the P3 display. The main reason I use LP-PAN/NaP3 on the run radio is to check the band activity (i.e., is the band open enough to run?) I've tried to use it to find an empty space to run, but haven't had a lot of success with that. For some reason, that's easier to do with the P3. Another issue is screen real-estate. I happen to have a 24 main monitor that I use for the contest logger, a 20 second monitor that I use for NaP3 and a bunch of other utility programs and a 7 touch screen I use for a program I wrote called AntennaMaster that I use to select antennas, tune SteppIRs, tune my Acom amp, etc. If you have just one monitor, it's hard to find enough room on it for NaP3 and all the other things you might want to see during a contest. As for CPU usage, when I had a core2-Duo system, LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF used a lot of CPU and the system fans would be humping it all contest. I worried about the heat stress that was putting on the system, especially the CPU. Now I have an i7-based system with an NVIDIA 570 graphics card and the CPU usage is much lower. CPU usage with LP-PAN/NaP3 is so low I barely notice that the fans are running a little faster. FWIW, I use LP-Bridge with Writelog and NaP3, and it works flawlessly. All in all, if the P3 was a little less expensive, I would use one on the run radio instead of LP-PAN/NaP3 (anybody want to sell me a used P3?) Now, I hasten to add that there are some advantages to the LP-PAN/NaP3 or LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF solutions. For one thing, it can provide a sub receiver if you don't have one. Second, it can produce excellent filtering and audio for AM B/C stations without having to buy a 6 KHz filter for the K3. For another thing, PowerSDR-IF has some monitor modes that transform it into a very useful receive monitor scope (like being able to see the other station's transmit envelope.) LP-PAN is also a lot cheaper than a P3. Even if I had a P3 for the run K3, I wouldn't sell my LP-PAN. I would hook them up together (more feasible with the $25 LP-PAN pre-amp option installed because the pre-amp helps to compensate for the 3dB IF splitter loss in the P3.) On the SubRX, whether money should be spent on that over a P3 depends very much on what you do with the radio. I would probably go for the sub because it makes the K3 a much more powerful radio. If you're a DX-er, it's indispensable because it allows dual-watch. If you're a contester with the right kind of antennas (ideally, opposite polarity), Diversity reception can be an unbelievable upgrade to your station -- it was for mine. That said, I use a full-size 2-el 40m beam at 110' and a full-size 40m 4-square with 60 radials per element. That combo had better be good! As has been noted, Diversity does require purchasing identical filters for all bandwidths with which you want to do Diversity reception. If you aren't a DX-er or a serious contester, then a sub might be less important and a P3 might make more sense for the dollars you have to spend. Hope this is helpful. 73, Dick WC1M -Original Message- From: Wes Stewart [mailto:n...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:59 AM To: Elecraft; Robert G. Strickland Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison I use an SDR-IQ on the i-f output of my K3. I use LP-Bridge to share data between the K3, SpectraVue, DXBase logging and/or N1MM. Additionally, with a laptop/SDR-IQ combination I have a nice little standalone receiver for travel use, although the sensitivity is poor without something like an active antenna. Disclaimer: I once owned an LP-PAN but sold it, I've never owned a P3 although I played with a preproduction one once. Wes Stewart N7WS --- On Mon, 7/2/12, Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net wrote: In another post I ask about sub-receiver versus panadapter. Here, a question about type of panadapter. My station occupies a very small space, and adding the P3 would strain the real estate. So, I've been looking at other panadapter possibilities that use the computer screen for display. What sort of useful comparisons can
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
I purchased the sub-Rx for entirely different application: dual-polarity diversity eme reception using adaptive SDR sw (Linrad): http://www.kl7uw.com/LINRAD.htm I originally bought two filters for the sub-Rx: 2.8 and 13-KHz thinking the 13-KHz filter would permit me to run wideband audio to a soundcard for JT-65 or Spectran waterfall displays. But then I learned the K3 audio output is filtered to about 4-KHz voiding this approach. Thus, I sold my second 13-KHz filter. I currently have just one 2.8-KHz filter in the sub-Rx which is adequate since DSP filtering can reduce this as needed. I should state I do not do HF contesting or DX chasing so need for a good CW filter in the sub-Rx is not required. I have 13-KHz, 2.8-KHz, and 400-Hz filters in the main-Rx. I do have two LP-Pan for connection to both main-RX and sub-Rx IF outputs in order to provide audio IQ signals to my computer via a four port M-Audio Delta44 soundcard. This is how I implement my dual-pol reception system for 2m-eme and accomplish 96-KHz bandspan bandwidth (limit of Delta44 soundcard). For simple bandspan reception I use the LP-Pan and emu-0202 at up to 192-KHz bandwidth on the main-Rx. 73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45 == BP40IQ 500 KHz - 10-GHz www.kl7uw.com EME: 50-1.1kw?, 144-1.4kw, 432-QRT, 1296-?, 3400-? DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@gmail.com Kits made by KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com/kits.htm == __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for July 1st 2nd, 2012
Good Morning, It is too cold in here to type well. With night time temperatures in the mid 40s the house gets quite chilly each morning. Right now it has warmed up to 50 degrees. I cannot wait for summer to get here with a few days in the 70s or even in the 80s (it could happen). But the forecast is for more cold and more rain. It is very hard to believe there is a record heat wave going on in the US when it is so cold and wet here. Propagation has been bouncing up and down lately. Sunday's nets were tough. On twenty meters I got one check in from either coast with no one in between. I read there were some storms out east but I could not hear them. Here our storms are milder due to the much lower temperatures. I keep looking forward to the 60 degree days coming up. Hopefully the house will warm up enough I won't have to keep the fire going to stay warm. On to the lists = On 14050 kHz at 2200z: K0DTJ - Brian - CA - K3 - 4113 K1THP - Dave - CT - K3 - 686 On 7045 kHz at 0200z: K6PJV - Dale - CA - K3 - 1183 W0CZ - Ken - ND - K3 - 457 NS7P - Phil - OR - K3 - 1286 K0DTJ - Brian - CA - K3 - 4113 N0TA - John - CO - K3 - 994 If any of you want to cool off and feel rain on your faces come to the Pacific Northwest. Our summer is in abeyance for at least another month. But once the clouds clear I am sure the temperatures will quickly rise into the 70s (cross fingers here). This year I am heating my greenhouse and the plants are enjoying warm roots. They are doing well and feeding me too. Plus working in the greenhouse gets me warmed up. Until next week, 73, Kevin. KD5ONS (Net Control Operator 5th Class) - __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver
I agree that only three filters are necessary in the subRX. I've got the FM filter, which covers AM and ESSB, a 2.8 kHz filter, and the 400 Hz CW in my KRX3. The performance using these filters is fine, certainly better than the second receivers in the Orions (although the new optional RX is supposed to be an improvement) and the FT-5000. 73, Scott, N9AA On 7/3/12 8:48 AM, Mike K2MK wrote: I now believe I only really needed 3 in my sub RX and one day if I have reason to remove my sub RX I'll take out the filter I don't use and sell it. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp Update
Thanks to all who responded. I ordered the K3PR6 preamp yesterday. Pete, W1RM -Original Message- From: Peter Chamalian [mailto:w...@arrl.net] Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 4:24 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp Being new to 6 meters, I'm wondering if the investment in the K3PR6 is worth it. I'm using an Innova 5 element LPA VR at 85 feet fed with hard line with the last 20 or so feet with Buryflex so the loss is pretty minimal. If you have experience with the K3PR6 Preamp, I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks, Pete, W1RM __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
If you haven't tried it, play with the FFT samples and averaging a bit more. Also the DSP windowing functions. It should be possible to set the RBW for NaP3 to be the same, higher or lower than P3, and the setting is saved per mode and per band. The FFT settings have changed over time with the various releases of NaP3, so the version you use will matter. Larry N8LP Dick Green WC1M-2 wrote Some comments that may be helpful for both threads about the P3: I have two K3s in an SO2R contest configuration. The K3 I use mostly for running has an LP-Pan and NaP3. I just installed the pre-amp option in my LP-PAN, and it works well, but I haven't done a contest with it yet. The run K3 also has a SubRX that I use almost exclusively for Diversity reception. The radio I use mostly for SP has a P3 (no SVGA card) and no SubRX. Both panadapter solutions work well, but I have a preference for the P3, especially for SP. The main reason is that the P3 display seems sharper and more responsive to me. This will sound odd, but the signals on LP-PAN/NaP3 seem slightly fat and slow, and the screen display seems more chaotic that it does on the P3. It could be that the display is just that much bigger, but I don't know. I've not been able to make the NaP3 display look as good or respond as well as the P3 display. The main reason I use LP-PAN/NaP3 on the run radio is to check the band activity (i.e., is the band open enough to run?) I've tried to use it to find an empty space to run, but haven't had a lot of success with that. For some reason, that's easier to do with the P3. Another issue is screen real-estate. I happen to have a 24 main monitor that I use for the contest logger, a 20 second monitor that I use for NaP3 and a bunch of other utility programs and a 7 touch screen I use for a program I wrote called AntennaMaster that I use to select antennas, tune SteppIRs, tune my Acom amp, etc. If you have just one monitor, it's hard to find enough room on it for NaP3 and all the other things you might want to see during a contest. As for CPU usage, when I had a core2-Duo system, LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF used a lot of CPU and the system fans would be humping it all contest. I worried about the heat stress that was putting on the system, especially the CPU. Now I have an i7-based system with an NVIDIA 570 graphics card and the CPU usage is much lower. CPU usage with LP-PAN/NaP3 is so low I barely notice that the fans are running a little faster. FWIW, I use LP-Bridge with Writelog and NaP3, and it works flawlessly. All in all, if the P3 was a little less expensive, I would use one on the run radio instead of LP-PAN/NaP3 (anybody want to sell me a used P3?) Now, I hasten to add that there are some advantages to the LP-PAN/NaP3 or LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF solutions. For one thing, it can provide a sub receiver if you don't have one. Second, it can produce excellent filtering and audio for AM B/C stations without having to buy a 6 KHz filter for the K3. For another thing, PowerSDR-IF has some monitor modes that transform it into a very useful receive monitor scope (like being able to see the other station's transmit envelope.) LP-PAN is also a lot cheaper than a P3. Even if I had a P3 for the run K3, I wouldn't sell my LP-PAN. I would hook them up together (more feasible with the $25 LP-PAN pre-amp option installed because the pre-amp helps to compensate for the 3dB IF splitter loss in the P3.) On the SubRX, whether money should be spent on that over a P3 depends very much on what you do with the radio. I would probably go for the sub because it makes the K3 a much more powerful radio. If you're a DX-er, it's indispensable because it allows dual-watch. If you're a contester with the right kind of antennas (ideally, opposite polarity), Diversity reception can be an unbelievable upgrade to your station -- it was for mine. That said, I use a full-size 2-el 40m beam at 110' and a full-size 40m 4-square with 60 radials per element. That combo had better be good! As has been noted, Diversity does require purchasing identical filters for all bandwidths with which you want to do Diversity reception. If you aren't a DX-er or a serious contester, then a sub might be less important and a P3 might make more sense for the dollars you have to spend. Hope this is helpful. 73, Dick WC1M -Original Message- From: Wes Stewart [mailto:n7ws@] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:59 AM To: Elecraft; Robert G. Strickland Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison I use an SDR-IQ on the i-f output of my K3. I use LP-Bridge to share data between the K3, SpectraVue, DXBase logging and/or N1MM. Additionally, with a laptop/SDR-IQ combination I have a nice little standalone receiver for travel use, although the sensitivity is poor without something like an active antenna. Disclaimer: I once owned an LP-PAN but sold it, I've never owned a P3
[Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp
Based on recent comments, it seems that I may well profit from ordering the second receiver module for my K3. Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz, 8-pole) for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver? Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] KX3 kit #543
Well, I ordered on the morning of Dec 28 and finally got my kit #543 yesterday. Just as a final stinger, UPS announced that it would be delivered last Friday and even marked it out for delivery on their site, but the truck never made it and I had to wait over the weekend. But all's well that ends well, and I now have it on the air. Started it last night, finished this morning. When assembling this kit, one has to be dazzled by the incredible amount of thought and ingenious engineering that went into figuring out how all those goodies fit together. I have the version with ATU and roofing filter, which makes things a little crowded inside that box, but it all fits and is very elegant. It hears my XG3 just fine, and I hear signals on the bands -- now for some QSOs. 73, Tony KT0NY -- http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp
Yes, if you want to use the sub for Diversity reception. Matt Zilmer Consultant - Product Management Dept. Magellan Navigation / MiTAC Digital Corp. Tel: (909) 394-6052 Cell: (909) 730-6552 Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Lowman Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:36 PM To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp Based on recent comments, it seems that I may well profit from ordering the second receiver module for my K3. Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz, 8-pole) for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver? Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp
Jim, Based on my experience, if the budget allows, make the second receiver set the same as the first. 73 Don K5AQ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp
I think it depends on what you want to use the sub-RX for. If it's mainly for tracking split DX pileups, I think that the stock 2.7k filter is probably quite sufficient, and fitting a full set of other filters is nuts! I can see (some) narrow filters being of value for someone who makes extensive use of diversity RX (with appropriate RX antennas) in contest-type environments (crowded bands), though... 73, ~iain / N6ML On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM, donhall161 donhall...@sbcglobal.net wrote: Jim, Based on my experience, if the budget allows, make the second receiver set the same as the first. 73 Don K5AQ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
My 1950's 6V6 xtal oscillator and now my KX1 or any rig whose power I crank down becomes a feather weight station because I use it to tickle the Aether. But QRP works better on CW. When someone steps on my sig, I assume it's because they can't hear me (I know there are other reasons, but I prefer to think the best of people) so I QSY or, if I'm in a QSO, just work through or around them. That's an opportunity to hone my copy skills through QRM. The last time I picked up a firearm was in the US Army. It's only function was to wound or kill others. I prefer a gentler metaphor for my Ham rig. 73, Ron AC7AC -Original Message- Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting
The CW delay is not the issue but the delay fore the amplifier keyeng circuit. It is always set for QSK and dose not follow the delay that is set for the CW break in. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp
Having the same filters in both receivers, especially the cw filters, is a good idea *if* you will use the second receiver for diversity reception. However, I don't see why you would want both the 400 Hz and the 250 Hz filters in any receiver, as the real bandwidth of these filters (particularly the 250 Hz) is not close to the nominal numbers. In reality these filters are so close in bandwidth that having both seems redundant for most usage scenarios. If it were my rig, I would sell one of these filters and use the proceeds to buy one filter for the second receiver. 73, Erik K7TV Based on recent comments, it seems that I may well profit from ordering the second receiver module for my K3. Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz, 8-pole) for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver? Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
On HF I think I am a water pistol ;-( On 7/3/2012 7:39 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote: Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Lance Collister, W7GJ (ex WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8, E51SIX, 3D2LR, 5W0GJ) P.O. Box 73 Frenchtown, MT 59834-0073 USA TEL: (406) 626-5728 QTH: DN27ub URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj Windows Messenger: w...@hotmail.com Skype: lanceW7GJ 2m DXCC #11/6m DXCC #815 Interested in 6m EME? Ask me about subscribing to the Magic Band EME email group, or just fill in the request box at the bottom of my web page (above)! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
I was thinking... maybe a rock and string? oh.. I know it isn't a pistol.. but sometimes I can hit thingsdoes that count?? --... ...-- Dale - WC7S in Wy Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 22:00:17 + From: w...@q.com To: rc...@verizon.net CC: elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size On HF I think I am a water pistol ;-( On 7/3/2012 7:39 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote: Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Lance Collister, W7GJ (ex WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8, E51SIX, 3D2LR, 5W0GJ) P.O. Box 73 Frenchtown, MT 59834-0073 USA TEL: (406) 626-5728 QTH: DN27ub URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj Windows Messenger: w...@hotmail.com Skype: lanceW7GJ 2m DXCC #11/6m DXCC #815 Interested in 6m EME? Ask me about subscribing to the Magic Band EME email group, or just fill in the request box at the bottom of my web page (above)! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp
Absolutely -- And remember that the receive bandwidth is *not* defined by these filters. The bandwidth is established by the DSP filters. The crystal filters come into play only if there is a signal so extremely strong that it can overwhelm the DSP. The function of the crystal filters is to reduce the strength of such a signal so that it can be handled by the DSP filters. 73, Ron AC7AC -Original Message- Having the same filters in both receivers, especially the cw filters, is a good idea *if* you will use the second receiver for diversity reception. However, I don't see why you would want both the 400 Hz and the 250 Hz filters in any receiver, as the real bandwidth of these filters (particularly the 250 Hz) is not close to the nominal numbers. In reality these filters are so close in bandwidth that having both seems redundant for most usage scenarios. If it were my rig, I would sell one of these filters and use the proceeds to buy one filter for the second receiver. 73, Erik K7TV Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz, 8-pole) for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver? Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
On 7/3/2012 3:39 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote: Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert Finally, as in the lowest output used to be referred to as a peanut whistle. Larry W2LJ -- 73 de Larry W2LJ QRP - When you care to send the very least! http://w2lj.blogspot.com/ http://www.w2lj.qrpradio.com/ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
And this exercise serves what purpose? Mike / KK5F Non-PhD -Original Message- From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Any idea what the model designation is? -Original Message- From: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Sent: Jul 3, 2012 6:28 PM To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually oscillating? Dave K9SW On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote: Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting
Howard, Read the manual carefully - it says that the delay is the time for the receiver to *unmute* - it does not claim to extend the Keyout time. Now, having said that, there is nothing wrong with appealing to Wayne and other designers to have it also apply to the Keyout timing. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 4:57 PM, Howard Sherer wrote: The CW delay is not the issue but the delay fore the amplifier keyeng circuit. It is always set for QSK and dose not follow the delay that is set for the CW break in. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
Injection of a little humor from time to time is not a bad thing. Well, for most of us. 73, Tim Herrick, KQ8M Charter Member North Coast Contesters k...@kq8m.com K3 Serial #5934 AR-Cluster V6 kq8m.no-ip.org User Ports: 23, 7373 with local skimmer, 7374 without local skimmer Server Ports: V6 3607, V4 Active 3605, V4 Passive 3606 -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Morrow Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:26 PM To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size And this exercise serves what purpose? Mike / KK5F Non-PhD -Original Message- From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Cameron, In order to calibrate the 4 MHz reference as stated, you must have a very accurate frequency counter (the first bullet), or you can listen with another calibrated receiver (2nd bullet), or you can just do as the 3rd bullet indicates and set the C22 trimmer to center. Whichever you use will not change the rest of your bringup of the K2. When you have all bands working, I do encourage you to do a good dial frequency calibration - see my website www.w3fpr.com article for the procedure. OK, now back to your problem. I am not certain from your words, but I assume you read all zeros in the K2 display when you attempt CAL FCTR and the probe in TP3. That may mean that the PLL reference oscillator is not working, or it could mean that your counter probe is not working. If that is the case, try the probe in TP2 to see if you can read the BFO frequency. If both TP2 and TP3 show all zeros, I would conclude that you have a faulty internal frequency probe or problems with Q9 and Q10 on the Control Board. If you have a good BFO frequency response at TP2, but all zeros at TP3, that means the PLL reference oscillator is not working. Go to the schematic (RF Board sheet 1 of 4) and look in the upper left corner. The components shown there (over to but not including U4) are the ones you need to check for good soldering, and the diodes for proper orientation. If you need help with diode orientation, look at the parts placement diagram in the back of the manual. Then move on to the DC voltage measurements for Q19 to see if all looks well there. You will need to get some reasonably proper frequency readout from TP3 (The next and more important step is the PLL range which is the test in the right column). That must be correct before moving on. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 7:41 PM, Cameron Haines wrote: Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
It serves to pass the time until our KX3s are delivered! Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de Telcel -Original Message- From: Mike Morrow k...@earthlink.net Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:25:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00) To: Elecraftelecraft@mailman.qth.net Reply-To: Mike Morrow k...@arrl.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size And this exercise serves what purpose? Mike / KK5F Non-PhD -Original Message- From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm. Thanks David! From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually oscillating? Dave K9SW On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote: Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Cameron, Read my last post carefully. Then tell us whether you are seeing all zeros when plugged into TP3 and in CAL FCTR. If you have all zeros, either your probe is bad or your PLL reference is not oscillating. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 8:40 PM, Cameron Haines wrote: Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm. Thanks David! From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually oscillating? Dave K9SW On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote: Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
*Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio from the K3 I thought I would mention the subsequent test I tried. 1. Check that both BNC connectors were 'seated correctly' 2. Replace the Elecraft supplied BNC inter-connect cable 3. Relocate the P3 from it's position on the desk. None of these appears to have resolved the issue..which does not disappoint me one bit. After all, it IS a desired 'feature' for me. It appears that if the P3 is placed on the left side and on top of the KPA-500 there may be some 'leakage' getting into the P3 and showing up on the P3 display as TX audio. This may be the root cause? Whilst this does not happen on every transmission, and is not deliberately repeatable, it does show up several times a day and I think it's rather cool even if not consistent which would be even nicer. I know many have asked for this to be a standard feature of the P3 and I also note that Alan (N1AL) has stated this is not an easy option and I got the impression it most likely would not be done in the near future...read years? For those of us with not so good hearing when it comes to the voice spectrum, this is a way for us to check on our transmitted signal and not need to wait for a negative comment or intrude on a QSO and inquire if our TX audio is OK. Given the lack of operators who would be either unable to give an accurate description of the audio, or indeed the sometimes abrupt response received and in many cases the other station has tailored his receive audio to best suit his/her hearing, I will take advantage of this anomaly for now and enjoy it. Thanks for the BW...:-) 73 Gary * -- Gary VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile Elecraft Equipment K3 #679,P3 #1629, KPA-500 #018 KAT-500#?? Living the dream!!! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
I have a bazooka match. Does that mean I'm a big gun? -Original Message- From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of cq_dx_de_aa...@yahoo.com Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:39 PM To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size It serves to pass the time until our KX3s are delivered! Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de Telcel -Original Message- From: Mike Morrow k...@earthlink.net Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:25:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00) To: Elecraftelecraft@mailman.qth.net Reply-To: Mike Morrow k...@arrl.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size And this exercise serves what purpose? Mike / KK5F Non-PhD -Original Message- From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger
I also found it hard to remove the batteries from the holders. The 4 slots (2 on each holder) at the end of each holder have retainers. Either my fingers are starting to age, or these are hard to remove. Dan N6WN - Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:49:47 -0700 From: Erik Basilier ebasil...@cox.net Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Message-ID: 008101cd58ce$e459a580$ad0cf080$@net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii JP wrote: All battery packs, regardless of chemistry, benefit from a periodic balance/equalize charge. Do you have any specific recommendation on how often one needs to take out the NiMH batteries to balance them? The KX3 battery holders are very solid (good) but I find it difficult to remove the batteries, as significant force is needed. I have a set of NiMH in there, and my default plan is to just leave them there for as long as possible. I hope I can install the charger when it arrives without removing the batteries. And, I am running on external power whenever I can, so that the internal batteries won't need to be charged until the internal charger arrives. 73, Erik K7TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Don, Great advice. I wasn't able to construct the probe for the frequency counter; missing the capacitor in the kit, either lost it or wasn't included. I decided to use a external counter instead. Now, if I simply jumper P6 to T2 and T3, I do get a reading, though sure its inaccurate, but reading nonetheless. I will email Elecraft for missing capacitor. In the interim, do you have a suggestion or replacement cap that will give same or near results until part comes in or another work-around? Cameron From: Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Cc: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Cameron, Read my last post carefully. Then tell us whether you are seeing all zeros when plugged into TP3 and in CAL FCTR. If you have all zeros, either your probe is bad or your PLL reference is not oscillating. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 8:40 PM, Cameron Haines wrote: Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm. Thanks David! From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually oscillating? Dave K9SW On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote: Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
Wouldn't part of displaying the TX signal have to be implemented in the K3? If so it's a TWO box modification. Fix the K3 to send the TX signal across the connector to the P3 instead of the RX bandwidth. Then the P3 would need to switch to the bandwidth needed to display the TX signal when the K3 was in transmit. This last because most of the time we are watching on the P3 where we are NOT listening with the K3. Some other way to do that? 73, Guy. On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Gary Gregory garyvk...@gmail.com wrote: *Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio from the K3 I thought I would mention the subsequent test I tried. 1. Check that both BNC connectors were 'seated correctly' 2. Replace the Elecraft supplied BNC inter-connect cable 3. Relocate the P3 from it's position on the desk. None of these appears to have resolved the issue..which does not disappoint me one bit. After all, it IS a desired 'feature' for me. It appears that if the P3 is placed on the left side and on top of the KPA-500 there may be some 'leakage' getting into the P3 and showing up on the P3 display as TX audio. This may be the root cause? Whilst this does not happen on every transmission, and is not deliberately repeatable, it does show up several times a day and I think it's rather cool even if not consistent which would be even nicer. I know many have asked for this to be a standard feature of the P3 and I also note that Alan (N1AL) has stated this is not an easy option and I got the impression it most likely would not be done in the near future...read years? For those of us with not so good hearing when it comes to the voice spectrum, this is a way for us to check on our transmitted signal and not need to wait for a negative comment or intrude on a QSO and inquire if our TX audio is OK. Given the lack of operators who would be either unable to give an accurate description of the audio, or indeed the sometimes abrupt response received and in many cases the other station has tailored his receive audio to best suit his/her hearing, I will take advantage of this anomaly for now and enjoy it. Thanks for the BW...:-) 73 Gary * -- Gary VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile Elecraft Equipment K3 #679,P3 #1629, KPA-500 #018 KAT-500#?? Living the dream!!! __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
As originator of this thread and mindful of bandwidth, let's reflect on what has transpired and bring things to a peaceful conclusion. Thanks for all comments. ...robert On 7/3/2012 20:39, Robert G. Strickland wrote: Hello, all... I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? Happy 4th. ...robert -- Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New York, USA __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
Cameron, Yes, do get the capacitor for the probe, you will need it for your filter alignment even if you do not choose to follow my instructions for achieving good K2 Dial Calibration. Any 10 pF capacitor will do, but the axial one is better physically - it fits nicely under the heat shrink. I have a few counter probes with lumps because I substituted 10 pF disc ceramics for the axial capacitors. Note that I lose probes often - or more correctly, I leave them in my customer's K2s, so when I ger down to a qwuantity of one, I build another from whatever materials I have at hand - there is no magic it is just a shielded wire with a 10 pF capacitor at the probe end. BTW, a #14 AWG wire fits the probe sockets very nicely if you are inclined toward building your own probe tip. A small amount of grinding/filing will round the tip. Just jumpering between CB P6 and RF board TP2 or TP3 can lead to erroneous readings because any DC present is not being blocked, and that can skew the readings. If you have an external frequency counter, you can move on to the PLL range tests and the BFO range tests using the external counter rather than the internal one. Don't worry about the 4 MHZ reference for now (it may end up being slightly different than exactly 4.0 MHZ) - just set the trimmer slot as indicated by bullet 3. On 7/3/2012 9:33 PM, Cameron Haines wrote: Don, Great advice. I wasn't able to construct the probe for the frequency counter; missing the capacitor in the kit, either lost it or wasn't included. I decided to use a external counter instead. Now, if I simply jumper P6 to T2 and T3, I do get a reading, though sure its inaccurate, but reading nonetheless. I will email Elecraft for missing capacitor. In the interim, do you have a suggestion or replacement cap that will give same or near results until part comes in or another work-around? Cameron From: Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Cc: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Cameron, Read my last post carefully. Then tell us whether you are seeing all zeros when plugged into TP3 and in CAL FCTR. If you have all zeros, either your probe is bad or your PLL reference is not oscillating. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 8:40 PM, Cameron Haines wrote: Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm. Thanks David! From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually oscillating? Dave K9SW On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote: Correction. Hey Guys, Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. Any ideas where to go from here? Thanks, Cameron AE5UZ __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
Makes you wonder what the IR port on the back of the P3 was planned for (TX RF Sampler Pickup maybe)? 73, Bob, WB4SON __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger
Dan, Let me start with a smart comment - not all things in life are easy. The batteries should be hard to remove because of the spring tension - if it were easy, than the contact pressure would be questionable. As far as your fingers aging, while that may be true, I don't think that is a major factor here - it just makes plain sense to have adequate spring pressure on the battery contacts. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel B. Curtis wrote: I also found it hard to remove the batteries from the holders. The 4 slots (2 on each holder) at the end of each holder have retainers. Either my fingers are starting to age, or these are hard to remove. Dan N6WN - Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:49:47 -0700 From: Erik Basilier ebasil...@cox.net Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Message-ID: 008101cd58ce$e459a580$ad0cf080$@net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii JP wrote: All battery packs, regardless of chemistry, benefit from a periodic balance/equalize charge. Do you have any specific recommendation on how often one needs to take out the NiMH batteries to balance them? The KX3 battery holders are very solid (good) but I find it difficult to remove the batteries, as significant force is needed. I have a set of NiMH in there, and my default plan is to just leave them there for as long as possible. I hope I can install the charger when it arrives without removing the batteries. And, I am running on external power whenever I can, so that the internal batteries won't need to be charged until the internal charger arrives. 73, Erik K7TV __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
Guy, That would still only give a picture of the K3 output as found by the IF leak-through signal. I think a better approach is to wait until the external sensor is developed and released - that will show the real signal going out to the antenna. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 9:55 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote: Wouldn't part of displaying the TX signal have to be implemented in the K3? If so it's a TWO box modification. Fix the K3 to send the TX signal across the connector to the P3 instead of the RX bandwidth. Then the P3 would need to switch to the bandwidth needed to display the TX signal when the K3 was in transmit. This last because most of the time we are watching on the P3 where we are NOT listening with the K3. Some other way to do that? 73, Guy. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
Bob, all I can say is that if you have a 3-element Yagi at 60 ft., nothing you can do or say will make you anything but a big howitzer as viewed from the perspective of those of us at the bottom of the pileup. Tony KT0NY -- http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352 __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger
Thanks Don, The two batteries inside each holder are easy to take out. The two batteries on the outside of each holder are more difficult. It is not a function of the spring tension ... Probably assuming the spring tension is the same for each battery, it is the shape of the holder. That said, the fix is to put a silk ribbon under the outside batteries ... As has been suggested. Dan N6WN On Jul 3, 2012 7:20 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote: Dan, Let me start with a smart comment - not all things in life are easy. The batteries should be hard to remove because of the spring tension - if it were easy, than the contact pressure would be questionable. As far as your fingers aging, while that may be true, I don't think that is a major factor here - it just makes plain sense to have adequate spring pressure on the battery contacts. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel B. Curtis wrote: I also found it hard to remove the batteries from the holders. The 4 slots (2 on each holder) at the end of each holder have retainers. Either my fingers are starting to age, or these are hard to remove. Dan N6WN --**--- Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:49:47 -0700 From: Erik Basilier ebasil...@cox.net Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net Message-ID: 008101cd58ce$e459a580$**ad0cf080$@net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii JP wrote: All battery packs, regardless of chemistry, benefit from a periodic balance/equalize charge. Do you have any specific recommendation on how often one needs to take out the NiMH batteries to balance them? The KX3 battery holders are very solid (good) but I find it difficult to remove the batteries, as significant force is needed. I have a set of NiMH in there, and my default plan is to just leave them there for as long as possible. I hope I can install the charger when it arrives without removing the batteries. And, I am running on external power whenever I can, so that the internal batteries won't need to be charged until the internal charger arrives. 73, Erik K7TV __**__**__ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/elecrafthttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:elecr...@mailman.qth.**net Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] K2 CAT Command Question
I am trying to change the INP Menu setting on a remotely-operated K2. It is currently in the Paddle-reverse mode, and I need to change it to HAND. Looking at the K2 Programmer's Reference Manual, It looks like I can send SW41;UP; or SW41;SW01; to do this. When I send these commands using Han Radio Deluxe, I get an [error] returned and the value does not change. Can anyone see a mistake in my commands? Probably missing something obvious. 73, Tom, KG3V -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-CAT-Command-Question-tp7558597.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:03 +1000, Gary Gregory wrote: *Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio from the K3 ... I should have copied the list on my previous reply to Gary. (See below) Alan N1AL Forwarded Message From: Alan Bloom n...@sonic.net Reply-to: n...@sonic.net To: Gary Gregory garyvk...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Fwd: Screen Shots showing TX signal appearing on P3 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:07:08 -0700 Hi Gary, The P3 is supposed to blank the screen whenever the K3 goes into transmit mode. If that's not happening then it sounds like there must be an RS-232 communications problem between the K3 and P3. One possibility is if you have some third-party software program running on the PC that is overloading the RS-232 capacity by sending large volumes of commands to the K3. For example Ham Radio Deluxe is known to do that, depending on its settings. If you want to see the IF leakage during transmit you can do that by disconnecting the RS-232 cable. Another way is to change the Xcvr Sel menu selection to 8215 kHz (inverted) instead of K3. I've been resisting making that an official feature because it really isn't very reliable. It depends on random leakage through the mixer and PIN diode switches in the K3, which are unspecified. It also varies with band and transmit power level and may result in too small a signal to be useful under some conditions. The plan is to include a modulation monitor function with the future external power sensor option. I've had the hardware done for months but have been too busy with the SVGA development to have time to do the firmware. Real Soon Now. :=) Alan N1AL __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] K2 CAT Command Question
Tom, It may be an HRD problem or a problem with a USB to serial adapter. What happens if you issue the command with K3 Utility terminal page. That will tell you whether to look toward the K3 for the solution or toward HRD. Are you running HRD through LP-Bridge? If so, that is another possible block. 90% of the K3 commands work through LP-Bridge, but not all - this may be one of them (I really don't know, I am just guessing). 73, Don W3FPR lOn 7/3/2012 10:44 PM, Tom KG3V wrote: I am trying to change the INP Menu setting on a remotely-operated K2. It is currently in the Paddle-reverse mode, and I need to change it to HAND. Looking at the K2 Programmer's Reference Manual, It looks like I can send SW41;UP; or SW41;SW01; to do this. When I send these commands using Han Radio Deluxe, I get an [error] returned and the value does not change. Can anyone see a mistake in my commands? Probably missing something obvious. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] KX3 Amp keying
In a much earlier question I had asked Wayne if the KX3 would be able to key the Juma PA100D amplifier. He responded with a yes.. I tried it today with a cable from KX3 ACC2 to the T/R input on the Juma amp. Yes it did key the amp, but when connected there was an appreciable receive loss on the KX3. I am guessing, but in the order of 20-30db. What am I missing here ? I'll take another look at it tomorrow… Sid KC2EE __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Amp keying
That sounds like Juma amp problem to me. The antenna to KX3 loss during receive should be zero or close to it. Sounds like you need to consult with Customer Support at Juma. 73, Don W3FPR On 7/3/2012 11:38 PM, Sid Leben wrote: In a much earlier question I had asked Wayne if the KX3 would be able to key the Juma PA100D amplifier. He responded with a yes.. I tried it today with a cable from KX3 ACC2 to the T/R input on the Juma amp. Yes it did key the amp, but when connected there was an appreciable receive loss on the KX3. I am guessing, but in the order of 20-30db. What am I missing here ? I'll take another look at it tomorrow… Sid KC2EE __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
Gary, I had replied to your post, perhaps it went to you direct and I am on your naughty list ? ;) Anyhow if the K3 baud rate (rs-232 config) is not 38400 then that will do it. Some versions of firmware in the past would sync the K3-P3 to 38400, but I am not sure now. Anyhow check the baud rate. I used that trick with a PF assigned to change K3 baud rate to other than 38400 to chk my TX. It was good for one over and then would re-sync back to 38400. cheers Adrian -- View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-TX-Audio-monitoring-tp7558585p7558602.html Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
[Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring
*Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio from the K3 I thought I would mention the subsequent test I tried. Gary, I'll respond. What you are seeing is normal. It happens on my P3 at times. I would like to have it be user selectable, or better yet, full time. We can disconnect the serial cable (if memory serves me) to monitor our Tx at present. But as I see it happening at times, I realize that it could be provided to us. I like seeing my signal displayed so that I know I have a clean signal with straight skirts, and if the audio needs equalizing, etc. Richard Fjeld, NØCE __ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html