Re: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp

2012-07-03 Thread Edward R. Cole
I opted to purchase the P50VDG GasFet preamp from Advanced Receiver 
Research, which worked fine.  Somehow I blew the Gasfet so have to 
repair it (uses mgf-1302).  Recent reports from a local net are that 
I am received S9+ while I struggle to hear the local (70-mi away) 
station running the same power (100w).  The K3 even with PRE turned 
on is not very good on 6m and an external preamp does wonders.  I 
found it best to run the K3 with PRE off if using an external preamp.


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 50-1.1kw?, 144-1.4kw, 432-QRT, 1296-?, 3400-?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@gmail.com
Kits made by KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com/kits.htm
==
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp

2012-07-03 Thread Svend Spanget
I build this: http://www.ham-radio.com/n6ca/50MHz/50appnotes/U310.html
Works fine - much cheaper!

Vy 73 de Svend, OZ7UV

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] 1A0C

2012-07-03 Thread Holger Doerschel
01.07.2012 16:50, schrieb Tony Estep:
 1A0C is now up and running, and they
 have one of those cool on-line logging setups wherewith your QSO appears in
 their on-line log within seconds after the last dit dies away.

Great poetic words Tony!

It might be a little bit hard for hams outside the european wall...

The team of 1A0C might have some issues with their online-log. My band 
slots appear not in the right order. But they do a great job even 
outside their ham-activities! So please donate!

regards
Holger - DL9HDA
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread eric manning
Subreceiver!

Adding LP-PAN or a similar SDR plus Skimmer will give you a useful 
picture of the [small, but often big-enough]
  band segment, plus callsign and 599 decoding.

RObert said:

I have never used either a panadapter or a sub-receiver, so I'm a newbie
in this area. I use CW almost exclusively, and I chase DX and enter
contests [less so in the past, more in the future]. I have a small
pistol station with no allusions of being a band master. Question:
which of these two options might I find more useful for my station and
operating preferences?


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread Keith Heimbold
I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both 
useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3 more than the second 
receiver. 

One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is super 
awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are sporadic. I wouldn't operate 6m 
without it. I use the second receiver on 6m with my new SteppIR 6m passive and 
my 6m stack because I can have the antennas pointed in different directions 
which is super cool. If I had to choose between one or the other I would go 
with the Panadapter or P3. 

Keith
AG6AZ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread Mike K2MK
Hi Phil,

You should have some idea of when you might want to use diversity reception.
If you do then the filters that would be in use on your main RX should be
duplicated (and matched) in the sub RX. Likewise, you should really give
some thought to when you might use your sub RX. I have five filters in my
main RX and four in my sub RX. I now believe I only really needed 3 in my
sub RX and one day if I have reason to remove my sub RX I'll take out the
filter I don't use and sell it.

If you never plan on having multiple antennas you might never operate
diversity. In that case you won't need matched filters in your sub RX. But
that move could lower the resale value of your K3. More food for thought.

73,
Mike K2MK



Phillip Shepard wrote
 
 My understanding is that diversity receive works best with matched
 receiver
 topologies.  Should the subRx have the same filter array as the main Rx
 (bandwidths and types)?  If the main Rx has 8-pole 2.8, 1.8 and 0.4 kHz
 filters, should the subRx mimic that?  Thank you for the enlightenment.
 
 73,
 Phil, NS7P
 


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-panadapter-or-subreceiver-tp7558492p7558543.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Diversity receive w/o dedicated receive antenna

2012-07-03 Thread Jim Hoge
Your second antenna  does NOT need to be resonant to receive, either by itself 
or with another in diversity mode. My receive antenna is seasonal so I have 
employed antennas for other bands for receive when it is not up. While a non 
resonant will not present as strong a signal, it also will not present as 
strong a noise. The S/N ratio is unchanged but the human ear seems to hear 
better when the noise is reduced. I typically use an antenna for the next band 
(even harmonic).

73,
Jim W5QM



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread Bruce McLaughlin
I tend to 2nd that recommendation. I have both the P3 and a 2nd receiver in my 
K-3. I have the same filters for the sub receiver as the main receiver, 
although, I have never used diversity receive. I think the P3 is particularly 
helpful to check on band activity before you decide whether or not to switch to 
that band. For that, the 2nd receiver can obviously be useful. However, as far 
as actual operating is concerned. If I encounter a DX station using split I 
find that using RIT is sometimes quicker and faster than setting up a 2nd 
receiver and using split. Of course, if the split being used is wider than what 
is available with RIT then, of course you have no choice. All of this depends 
upon your operating habits. But I think it is a good idea to consider a P3 1st 
and then the 2nd receiver if you find that could be useful. By the way, I find 
the P3 much more useful than LP pan. It does not tie up the computer which I 
can then use for other things such as logging or station co
 ntrol. Part of that preference was caused by the fact that I did not make the 
If  gain modification to my K-3 and so the LP display showed very low amplitude 
signals which were often not very useful. That of course was my fault. I find 
the P3 has enough gain that the if was not required. That is not an issue with 
newer K-3s which already have the higher gain Incorporated on the board.

 Bruce-W8FU
On Jul 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Keith Heimbold wrote:

 I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both 
 useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3 more than the second 
 receiver. 
 
 One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is 
 super awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are sporadic. I wouldn't 
 operate 6m without it. I use the second receiver on 6m with my new SteppIR 6m 
 passive and my 6m stack because I can have the antennas pointed in different 
 directions which is super cool. If I had to choose between one or the other I 
 would go with the Panadapter or P3. 
 
 Keith
 AG6AZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread KQ8M
I do not have a P3 but I do have the subreceiver in my K3. I have found it 
totally indispensible. How many times have you hit the
wrong VFO when going back and forth in a split pileup only to draw the ire of 
half of the world and being called many descriptive
adjectives?

Being able to have the second receiver in my right ear and the main one in my 
left is extremely nice. Listening to the DX station
and having the ability to immediately tune the second VFO to where the DX is 
listening is priceless.

73,
Tim Herrick, KQ8M
Charter Member North Coast Contesters
k...@kq8m.com

K3 Serial #5934

AR-Cluster V6 kq8m.no-ip.org
User Ports: 23, 7373  with local skimmer, 7374 without local skimmer
Server Ports: V6 3607, V4 Active 3605, V4 Passive 3606


-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bruce McLaughlin
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 10:24 AM
To: Keith Heimbold
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net; eric manning
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

I tend to 2nd that recommendation. I have both the P3 and a 2nd receiver in my 
K-3. I have the same filters for the sub receiver as
the main receiver, although, I have never used diversity receive. I think the 
P3 is particularly helpful to check on band activity
before you decide whether or not to switch to that band. For that, the 2nd 
receiver can obviously be useful. However, as far as
actual operating is concerned. If I encounter a DX station using split I find 
that using RIT is sometimes quicker and faster than
setting up a 2nd receiver and using split. Of course, if the split being used 
is wider than what is available with RIT then, of
course you have no choice. All of this depends upon your operating habits. But 
I think it is a good idea to consider a P3 1st and
then the 2nd receiver if you find that could be useful. By the way, I find the 
P3 much more useful than LP pan. It does not tie up
the computer which I can then use for other things such as logging or station co
 ntrol. Part of that preference was caused by the fact that I did not make the 
If  gain modification to my K-3 and so the LP display
showed very low amplitude signals which were often not very useful. That of 
course was my fault. I find the P3 has enough gain that
the if was not required. That is not an issue with newer K-3s which already 
have the higher gain Incorporated on the board.

 Bruce-W8FU
On Jul 3, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Keith Heimbold wrote:

 I am a newbie ham and I have both in my one K3 Serial 1391 and I find both 
 useful but I definitely use the Panadapter with NAP3
more than the second receiver. 
 
 One of my closest friends who is a non ham calls it my fish finder. It is 
 super awesome for 6m fish finding when band props are
sporadic. I wouldn't operate 6m without it. I use the second receiver on 6m 
with my new SteppIR 6m passive and my 6m stack because I
can have the antennas pointed in different directions which is super cool. If I 
had to choose between one or the other I would go
with the Panadapter or P3. 
 
 Keith
 AG6AZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread Ignacy
I guess that one can find advantages of P3, LP-Pan or something else
depending on circumstances.

The main advantage of P3 is that it is standalone. No hassles of software
installation, instantaneous turn on, and excellent integration with K3.  But
since the  P3's the firmware is proprietary, it is modified dependent on
Elecraft's priorities.

For instance, a feature I am missing the most in P3 is noise blanker. Under
heavy power noise, K3's noise blanker can work pretty well but P3's screen
is covered by noise. In contrast, the noise blanker on SDR-IQ was
extraordinary, allowing to see weak signals in the present of heavy noise. 
At least two solutions here: 1) request a feature from Elecraft, or 2) call
the power company. 

I had many of software crashes with SDR-IQ. Perhaps no longer with new
computer and new drivers but I have lost enough time...

To tell the truth, the support of LP-PAN is more helpful than the support of
SDR-IQ.

Ignacy, NO9E



--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558547.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread Edward Dickinson III
I don't know if it has been said, but with a K3, no subreceiver and an
LP-Pan, it is possible to monitor the audio on both VFOs simultaneously.


73,
Dick - KA5KKT

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] N-Gen for sale

2012-07-03 Thread Alan Price

I am selling a built N-Gen with the battery for $45 including shipping.  Please 
respond off of the reflector.
 
73
Alan
W1HYV
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread Wes Stewart
I use an SDR-IQ on the i-f output of my K3.  I use LP-Bridge to share data 
between the K3, SpectraVue, DXBase logging and/or N1MM.

Additionally, with a laptop/SDR-IQ combination I have a nice little standalone 
receiver for travel use, although the sensitivity is poor without something 
like an active antenna.

Disclaimer: I once owned an LP-PAN but sold it, I've never owned a P3 although 
I played with a preproduction one once.

Wes Stewart N7WS

--- On Mon, 7/2/12, Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net wrote:



In another post I ask about sub-receiver versus panadapter. Here, a 
question about type of panadapter. My station occupies a very small 
space, and adding the P3 would strain the real estate. So, I've been 
looking at other panadapter possibilities that use the computer screen 
for display. What sort of useful comparisons can be made between the P3 
and the LP-Pan box/software? Are there any other panadapter options that 
I should consider? Thanks for any and all opinions.

...robert
-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread N8LP
Note: The noise blanker in NaP3 works on the display as well.

Larry N8LP





Ignacy wrote
 
 I guess that one can find advantages of P3, LP-Pan or something else
 depending on circumstances.
 
 The main advantage of P3 is that it is standalone. No hassles of software
 installation, instantaneous turn on, and excellent integration with K3. 
 But since the  P3's the firmware is proprietary, it is modified dependent
 on Elecraft's priorities.
 
 For instance, a feature I am missing the most in P3 is noise blanker.
 Under heavy power noise, K3's noise blanker can work pretty well but P3's
 screen is covered by noise. In contrast, the noise blanker on SDR-IQ was
 extraordinary, allowing to see weak signals in the present of heavy noise. 
 At least two solutions here: 1) request a feature from Elecraft, or 2)
 call the power company. 
 
 I had many of software crashes with SDR-IQ. Perhaps no longer with new
 computer and new drivers but I have lost enough time...
 
 To tell the truth, the support of LP-PAN is more helpful than the support
 of SDR-IQ.
 
 Ignacy, NO9E
 


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558549.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Diversity receive w/o dedicated receive antenna

2012-07-03 Thread Erik Basilier
I totally agree with Jim. Diversity receive is the only way I use the second
rx, and I never invested one cent in extra antennas for the second receiver.
For use with my horizontally polarized main antenna I just connect the
second rx to my existing vertical, which works fine even on bands that it is
not designed for. At Field Day I put up a BuddiPole vertical with no coil
and no attempt whatsoever to tune to any band, with a single wire
counterpoise of random length. If I didn't have the vertical at home, or the
BuddiPole for the field, I would just use two pieces of wire and suspend
whichever way is convenient. However, assuming the antennas are not far from
each other, it is important that they have opposite polarizations. 

 

To have the second receiver and not use it for diversity is a tragedy. After
you set the rf gain on the subreceiver to get a decent balance between the
two receivers, you will find that the second receiver often allows you to
hear a station in the second rx that is temporarily unreadable in the main
receiver due to qsb. Also, in crowded band conditions the different stations
within the receiver passband will arrive with varying polarizations, and you
can hear them spatially separated like orchestra instruments on a stereo
sound stage. This is helpful both for ssb and cw. Sometimes it can even
help with multiple cw signals on the exact same frequency.

 

73,

Erik K7TV

 

Your second antenna  does NOT need to be resonant to receive, either by
itself or with another in diversity mode. My receive antenna is seasonal so
I have employed antennas for other bands for receive when it is not up.
While a non resonant will not present as strong a signal, it also will not
present as strong a noise. The S/N ratio is unchanged but the human ear
seems to hear better when the noise is reduced. I typically use an antenna
for the next band (even harmonic).

 

73,

Jim W5QM

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread N8LP
We used to compare LP-PAN / NaP3 to the P3, but the apt comparison now is
with P3SVGA unless the user plans to use a 4 monitor on his PC ;-) NaP3 is
not a resource hog. I am running it on PCs ranging from a P4 to an Atom to
an i3. It runs fine on all of them. The E-MU 0204 can be a hog on older PCs,
but you really have to try to find a PC that slow today.

Larry N8LP



Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote
 
 Here's the direct link:
  http://www.telepostinc.com/P3_comp.html
 
 It's there plain as day about 1/3 of the way down the main LP-Pan
 page: http://www.telepostinc.com/LP-PAN.html
 
 Note - the comparison is between LP-Pan with NaP3 software and P3SVGA.
 LP-Pan/NaP3 is very computer intensive (PowerSDR is a resource hog)
 which is not adequately disclosed and the price comparisons are very
 biased by the cost of the SVGA option which increases the price of
 the base P3 by nearly 40%.
 
 73,
 
 ... Joe, W4TV
 
 
 
 On 7/2/2012 10:42 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
 Could you give us the URL for the comparison.  I've been on the page, but
 I
 can't find it.  Thanks and 73, Guy.

 On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Ignacy lt;no9e@gt; wrote:

 N8LP on his website has a very comprehensive and IMHO honest comparison
 of
 P3
 and LP-PAN.

 In snapshot, if you are strained on cash, good in computers, and
 occasional
 software problems are not an issue, use LP-PAN.

 If reliability and ability to change parameters fast via buttons are
 more
 important, P3 is good.

 I used SDR-IQ but eventually bought P3.

 Ignacy

 --
 View this message in context:
 http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558497.html
 Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558552.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread N8LP
LP-Bridge is not intended to support every command that every app might use,
but it supports 99% of the commands that most people use, and uses very few
resources. The biggest issues come with macros and commands that require
critical response timing, but LP-Bridge's ability to limit traffic to the
rig compared to splitters that just send everything from all the apps to the
rig is a big advantage.  There are some rules that have to be obeyed when
using multiple apps so that they don't work against each other and confuse
the rig. LP-Bridge enforces those rules at the expense of supporting 100% of
the commands from a given app. In some cases, LPB2 can be more useful if one
app needs complete control and the others can live with the dozen most used
commands.

One source of many problems is the use of USB to serial adapters. You have
to be careful to use a good brand with the proper drivers, especially with
win7 64-bit. 

Larry N8LP




Joe Subich, W4TV-4 wrote
 
 NaP3 is not the only software required with LP-Pan.  Most installations
 require LP-Bridge or some other software port sharing package to allow
 both NaP3 and a logging program to share control of the K3.
 
 Several logging packages fail to work properly with LP-Bridge to the
 point that their developers refuse to accept bug reports if LPB is
 running.  The resource load of LP-Pan must include both NaP3 and LPB
 as well as the interference they cause to logging software.  There is
 no such problem with the P3.
 
 73,
 
 ... Joe, W4TV
 
 
 
 On 7/2/2012 11:36 PM, Tony Estep wrote:
 On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV lt;lists@gt; wrote:

 ...LP-Pan/NaP3 is very computer intensive...

 ==
 On my 2009-vintage Asus laptop, running LP-Bridge and LP-Pan increases
 CPU
 usage by about 15 percentage points. With MixW2 and VE7CC running and a
 web
 browser open, total CPU load is about 30%. I have an outboard 23 monitor
 configured as an extended desktop, and am using ASIO drivers for an EMU
 0202. The NaP3 window is 13 1/2 wide, of which 12 is the panadapter
 picture of the band. There is enough CPU capability to display videos at
 full-screen size on the laptop screen while the rest of the stuff is
 running.

 Tony KT0NY


 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@.qth
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-P3-or-LP-PAN-comparison-tp7558493p7558554.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting

2012-07-03 Thread Howard Sherer
It appears that the amplifier keying line is always set to operate as 
QSK with
no delay. This keying signal dose not follow the delay that is set for 
the VOX
on CW. The only way that I have found to keep the keying line closed is 
to put
the KX3 into xmit with the front panel button.

Will an adjustable delay for the amplifier keying signal be added in the 
future?

Howard AE3T
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting

2012-07-03 Thread Rick Stealey


In cw mode:
Make sure QSK is not on.
Make sure VOX is on.
Push in and hold the speed control till CW n.nn appears.
Rotate the speed control to set the drop out time you want.
Anything up to 2 seconds can be set.

Let us know if this doesn't work for you.

Rick  K2XT



 It appears that the amplifier keying line is always set to operate as 
 QSK with
 no delay. This keying signal dose not follow the delay that is set for 
 the VOX
 on CW. 


  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread Dick Green WC1M
Some comments that may be helpful for both threads about the P3:

I have two K3s in an SO2R contest configuration. The K3 I use mostly for
running has an LP-Pan and NaP3. I just installed the pre-amp option in my
LP-PAN, and it works well, but I haven't done a contest with it yet. The run
K3 also has a SubRX that I use almost exclusively for Diversity reception.
The radio I use mostly for SP has a P3 (no SVGA card) and no SubRX.

Both panadapter solutions work well, but I have a preference for the P3,
especially for SP. The main reason is that the P3 display seems sharper and
more responsive to me. This will sound odd, but the signals on LP-PAN/NaP3
seem slightly fat and slow, and the screen display seems more chaotic
that it does on the P3. It could be that the display is just that much
bigger, but I don't know. I've not been able to make the NaP3 display look
as good or respond as well as the P3 display.

The main reason I use LP-PAN/NaP3 on the run radio is to check the band
activity (i.e., is the band open enough to run?) I've tried to use it to
find an empty space to run, but haven't had a lot of success with that. For
some reason, that's easier to do with the P3. 

Another issue is screen real-estate. I happen to have a 24 main monitor
that I use for the contest logger, a 20 second monitor that I use for NaP3
and a bunch of other utility programs and a 7 touch screen I use for a
program I wrote called AntennaMaster that I use to select antennas, tune
SteppIRs, tune my Acom amp, etc. If you have just one monitor, it's hard to
find enough room on it for NaP3 and all the other things you might want to
see during a contest.

As for CPU usage, when I had a core2-Duo system, LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF used a
lot of CPU and the system fans would be humping it all contest. I worried
about the heat stress that was putting on the system, especially the CPU.
Now I have an i7-based system with an NVIDIA 570 graphics card and the CPU
usage is much lower. CPU usage with LP-PAN/NaP3 is so low I barely notice
that the fans are running a little faster. FWIW, I use LP-Bridge with
Writelog and NaP3, and it works flawlessly.

All in all, if the P3 was a little less expensive, I would use one on the
run radio instead of LP-PAN/NaP3 (anybody want to sell me a used P3?) 

Now, I hasten to add that there are some advantages to the LP-PAN/NaP3 or
LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF solutions. For one thing, it can provide a sub receiver
if you don't have one. Second, it can produce excellent filtering and audio
for AM B/C stations without having to buy a 6 KHz filter for the K3. For
another thing, PowerSDR-IF has some monitor modes that transform it into a
very useful receive monitor scope (like being able to see the other
station's transmit envelope.) LP-PAN is also a lot cheaper than a P3. Even
if I had a P3 for the run K3, I wouldn't sell my LP-PAN. I would hook them
up together (more feasible with the $25 LP-PAN pre-amp option installed
because the pre-amp helps to compensate for the 3dB IF splitter loss in the
P3.)

On the SubRX, whether money should be spent on that over a P3 depends very
much on what you do with the radio. I would probably go for the sub because
it makes the K3 a much more powerful radio. If you're a DX-er, it's
indispensable because it allows dual-watch. If you're a contester with the
right kind of antennas (ideally, opposite polarity), Diversity reception can
be an unbelievable upgrade to your station -- it was for mine. That said, I
use a full-size 2-el 40m beam at 110' and a full-size 40m 4-square with 60
radials per element. That combo had better be good! As has been noted,
Diversity does require purchasing identical filters for all bandwidths with
which you want to do Diversity reception. If you aren't a DX-er or a serious
contester, then a sub might be less important and a P3 might make more sense
for the dollars you have to spend.

Hope this is helpful.

73, Dick WC1M

 -Original Message-
 From: Wes Stewart [mailto:n...@yahoo.com]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:59 AM
 To: Elecraft; Robert G. Strickland
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
 
 I use an SDR-IQ on the i-f output of my K3.  I use LP-Bridge to share
 data between the K3, SpectraVue, DXBase logging and/or N1MM.
 
 Additionally, with a laptop/SDR-IQ combination I have a nice little
 standalone receiver for travel use, although the sensitivity is poor
 without something like an active antenna.
 
 Disclaimer: I once owned an LP-PAN but sold it, I've never owned a P3
 although I played with a preproduction one once.
 
 Wes Stewart N7WS
 
 --- On Mon, 7/2/12, Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net wrote:
 
 
 
 In another post I ask about sub-receiver versus panadapter. Here, a
 question about type of panadapter. My station occupies a very small
 space, and adding the P3 would strain the real estate. So, I've been
 looking at other panadapter possibilities that use the computer screen
 for display. What sort of useful comparisons can 

Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread Edward R. Cole
I purchased the sub-Rx for entirely different application: 
dual-polarity diversity eme reception using adaptive SDR sw (Linrad):
http://www.kl7uw.com/LINRAD.htm
I originally bought two filters for the sub-Rx: 2.8 and 13-KHz 
thinking the 13-KHz filter would permit me to run wideband audio to a 
soundcard for JT-65 or Spectran waterfall displays.  But then I 
learned the K3 audio output is filtered to about 4-KHz voiding this 
approach.  Thus, I sold my second 13-KHz filter.

I currently have just one 2.8-KHz filter in the sub-Rx which is 
adequate since DSP filtering can reduce this as needed.  I should 
state I do not do HF contesting or DX chasing so need for a good CW 
filter in the sub-Rx is not required.  I have 13-KHz, 2.8-KHz, and 
400-Hz filters in the main-Rx.

I do have two LP-Pan for connection to both main-RX and sub-Rx IF 
outputs in order to provide audio IQ signals to my computer via a 
four port M-Audio Delta44 soundcard.  This is how I implement my 
dual-pol reception system for 2m-eme and accomplish 96-KHz bandspan 
bandwidth (limit of Delta44 soundcard).

For simple bandspan reception I use the LP-Pan and emu-0202 at up to 
192-KHz bandwidth on the main-Rx.


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 50-1.1kw?, 144-1.4kw, 432-QRT, 1296-?, 3400-?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@gmail.com
Kits made by KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com/kits.htm
==
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report for July 1st 2nd, 2012

2012-07-03 Thread kevinr
Good Morning,
It is too cold in here to type well.  With night time temperatures 
in the mid 40s the house gets quite chilly each morning.  Right now it 
has warmed up to 50 degrees.  I cannot wait for summer to get here with 
a few days in the 70s or even in the 80s (it could happen).  But the 
forecast is for more cold and more rain.  It is very hard to believe 
there is a record heat wave going on in the US when it is so cold and 
wet here.
Propagation has been bouncing up and down lately.  Sunday's nets 
were tough.  On twenty meters I got one check in from either coast with 
no one in between.  I read there were some storms out east but I could 
not hear them.  Here our storms are milder due to the much lower 
temperatures.  I keep looking forward to the 60 degree days coming up.  
Hopefully the house will warm up enough I won't have to keep the fire 
going to stay warm.

On to the lists =

   On 14050 kHz at 2200z:
K0DTJ - Brian - CA - K3 - 4113
K1THP - Dave - CT - K3 - 686

   On 7045 kHz at 0200z:
K6PJV - Dale - CA - K3 - 1183
W0CZ - Ken - ND - K3 - 457
NS7P - Phil - OR - K3 - 1286
K0DTJ - Brian - CA - K3 - 4113
N0TA - John - CO - K3 - 994

If any of you want to cool off and feel rain on your faces come to 
the Pacific Northwest.  Our summer is in abeyance for at least another 
month.  But once the clouds clear I am sure the temperatures will 
quickly rise into the 70s (cross fingers here).  This year I am heating 
my greenhouse and the plants are enjoying warm roots.  They are doing 
well and feeding me too.  Plus working in the greenhouse gets me warmed up.

Until next week,
73,
   Kevin.  KD5ONS  (Net Control Operator 5th Class)

-
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - panadapter or subreceiver

2012-07-03 Thread Scott Manthe
I agree that only three filters are necessary in the subRX. I've got the 
FM filter, which covers AM and ESSB, a 2.8 kHz filter, and the 400 Hz CW 
in my KRX3. The performance using these filters is fine, certainly 
better than the second receivers in the Orions (although the new 
optional RX is supposed to be an improvement) and the FT-5000.

73,
Scott, N9AA

On 7/3/12 8:48 AM, Mike K2MK wrote:
 I now believe I only really needed 3 in my
 sub RX and one day if I have reason to remove my sub RX I'll take out the
 filter I don't use and sell it.





__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp Update

2012-07-03 Thread Peter Chamalian
Thanks to all who responded.  I ordered the K3PR6 preamp yesterday.

Pete, W1RM

-Original Message-
From: Peter Chamalian [mailto:w...@arrl.net] 
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 4:24 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] K3PR6 Preamp

Being new to 6 meters, I'm wondering if the investment in the K3PR6 is worth
it.  

 

I'm using an Innova 5 element LPA VR at 85 feet fed with hard line with the
last 20 or so feet with Buryflex so the loss is pretty minimal.

 

If you have experience with the K3PR6 Preamp, I'd appreciate your comments.

 

Thanks,

 

Pete, W1RM

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison

2012-07-03 Thread N8LP
If you haven't tried it, play with the FFT samples and averaging a bit more.
Also the DSP windowing functions. It should be possible to set the RBW for
NaP3 to be the same, higher or lower than P3, and the setting is saved per
mode and per band. The FFT settings have changed over time with the various
releases of NaP3, so the version you use will matter. 

Larry N8LP



Dick Green WC1M-2 wrote
 
 Some comments that may be helpful for both threads about the P3:
 
 I have two K3s in an SO2R contest configuration. The K3 I use mostly for
 running has an LP-Pan and NaP3. I just installed the pre-amp option in my
 LP-PAN, and it works well, but I haven't done a contest with it yet. The
 run
 K3 also has a SubRX that I use almost exclusively for Diversity reception.
 The radio I use mostly for SP has a P3 (no SVGA card) and no SubRX.
 
 Both panadapter solutions work well, but I have a preference for the P3,
 especially for SP. The main reason is that the P3 display seems sharper
 and
 more responsive to me. This will sound odd, but the signals on LP-PAN/NaP3
 seem slightly fat and slow, and the screen display seems more chaotic
 that it does on the P3. It could be that the display is just that much
 bigger, but I don't know. I've not been able to make the NaP3 display look
 as good or respond as well as the P3 display.
 
 The main reason I use LP-PAN/NaP3 on the run radio is to check the band
 activity (i.e., is the band open enough to run?) I've tried to use it to
 find an empty space to run, but haven't had a lot of success with that.
 For
 some reason, that's easier to do with the P3. 
 
 Another issue is screen real-estate. I happen to have a 24 main monitor
 that I use for the contest logger, a 20 second monitor that I use for
 NaP3
 and a bunch of other utility programs and a 7 touch screen I use for a
 program I wrote called AntennaMaster that I use to select antennas, tune
 SteppIRs, tune my Acom amp, etc. If you have just one monitor, it's hard
 to
 find enough room on it for NaP3 and all the other things you might want to
 see during a contest.
 
 As for CPU usage, when I had a core2-Duo system, LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF used a
 lot of CPU and the system fans would be humping it all contest. I worried
 about the heat stress that was putting on the system, especially the CPU.
 Now I have an i7-based system with an NVIDIA 570 graphics card and the CPU
 usage is much lower. CPU usage with LP-PAN/NaP3 is so low I barely notice
 that the fans are running a little faster. FWIW, I use LP-Bridge with
 Writelog and NaP3, and it works flawlessly.
 
 All in all, if the P3 was a little less expensive, I would use one on the
 run radio instead of LP-PAN/NaP3 (anybody want to sell me a used P3?) 
 
 Now, I hasten to add that there are some advantages to the LP-PAN/NaP3 or
 LP-PAN/PowerSDR-IF solutions. For one thing, it can provide a sub receiver
 if you don't have one. Second, it can produce excellent filtering and
 audio
 for AM B/C stations without having to buy a 6 KHz filter for the K3. For
 another thing, PowerSDR-IF has some monitor modes that transform it into a
 very useful receive monitor scope (like being able to see the other
 station's transmit envelope.) LP-PAN is also a lot cheaper than a P3. Even
 if I had a P3 for the run K3, I wouldn't sell my LP-PAN. I would hook them
 up together (more feasible with the $25 LP-PAN pre-amp option installed
 because the pre-amp helps to compensate for the 3dB IF splitter loss in
 the
 P3.)
 
 On the SubRX, whether money should be spent on that over a P3 depends very
 much on what you do with the radio. I would probably go for the sub
 because
 it makes the K3 a much more powerful radio. If you're a DX-er, it's
 indispensable because it allows dual-watch. If you're a contester with the
 right kind of antennas (ideally, opposite polarity), Diversity reception
 can
 be an unbelievable upgrade to your station -- it was for mine. That said,
 I
 use a full-size 2-el 40m beam at 110' and a full-size 40m 4-square with 60
 radials per element. That combo had better be good! As has been noted,
 Diversity does require purchasing identical filters for all bandwidths
 with
 which you want to do Diversity reception. If you aren't a DX-er or a
 serious
 contester, then a sub might be less important and a P3 might make more
 sense
 for the dollars you have to spend.
 
 Hope this is helpful.
 
 73, Dick WC1M
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Wes Stewart [mailto:n7ws@]
 Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 11:59 AM
 To: Elecraft; Robert G. Strickland
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - P3 or LP-PAN comparison
 
 I use an SDR-IQ on the i-f output of my K3.  I use LP-Bridge to share
 data between the K3, SpectraVue, DXBase logging and/or N1MM.
 
 Additionally, with a laptop/SDR-IQ combination I have a nice little
 standalone receiver for travel use, although the sensitivity is poor
 without something like an active antenna.
 
 Disclaimer: I once owned an LP-PAN but sold it, I've never owned a P3
 

[Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

2012-07-03 Thread Jim Lowman
Based on recent comments, it seems that I may well profit from ordering
the second receiver module for my K3.

Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz, 
8-pole)
for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver?

Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] KX3 kit #543

2012-07-03 Thread Tony Estep
Well, I ordered on the morning of Dec 28 and finally got my kit #543
yesterday. Just as a final stinger, UPS announced that it would be
delivered last Friday and even marked it out for delivery on their site,
but the truck never made it and I had to wait over the weekend.

But all's well that ends well, and I now have it on the air. Started it
last night, finished this morning. When assembling this kit, one has to be
dazzled by the incredible amount of thought and ingenious engineering that
went into figuring out how all those goodies fit together. I have the
version with ATU and roofing filter, which makes things a little crowded
inside that box, but it all fits and is very elegant.

It hears my XG3 just fine, and I hear signals on the bands -- now for some
QSOs.

73, Tony KT0NY


-- 
http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

2012-07-03 Thread Matthew Zilmer
Yes, if you want to use the sub for Diversity reception.

Matt Zilmer
Consultant - Product Management Dept.
Magellan Navigation / MiTAC Digital Corp.
Tel: (909) 394-6052
Cell: (909) 730-6552
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Jim Lowman
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 12:36 PM
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

Based on recent comments, it seems that I may well profit from ordering the 
second receiver module for my K3.

Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz,
8-pole)
for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver?

Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

2012-07-03 Thread donhall161
Jim,

Based on my experience, if the budget allows, make the second receiver set 
the same as the first.

73  Don  K5AQ 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] [K3] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

2012-07-03 Thread iain macdonnell - N6ML
I think it depends on what you want to use the sub-RX for. If it's
mainly for tracking split DX pileups, I think that the stock 2.7k
filter is probably quite sufficient, and fitting a full set of other
filters is nuts! I can see (some) narrow filters being of value for
someone who makes extensive use of diversity RX (with appropriate RX
antennas) in contest-type environments (crowded bands), though...

73,

 ~iain / N6ML


On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:08 PM, donhall161 donhall...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
 Jim,

 Based on my experience, if the budget allows, make the second receiver set
 the same as the first.

 73  Don  K5AQ

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Robert G. Strickland
Hello, all...

I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little 
pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham 
station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a 
big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, 
this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small 
lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w 
amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY 
[most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is 
forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency 
when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes 
up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? 
Happy 4th.

...robert
-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
My 1950's 6V6 xtal oscillator and now my KX1 or any rig whose power I crank
down becomes a feather weight station because I use it to tickle the
Aether. But QRP works better on CW.

When someone steps on my sig, I assume it's because they can't hear me (I
know there are other reasons, but I prefer to think the best of people) so I
QSY or, if I'm in a QSO, just work through or around them. That's an
opportunity to hone my copy skills through QRM. 

The last time I picked up a firearm was in the US Army. It's only function
was to wound or kill others. I prefer a gentler metaphor for my Ham rig. 

73, Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-

Hello, all...

I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little pistol.
That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham station. Big
Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a big pistol, a
little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, this is very
subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small lot, SkyHawk at
60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w amp, and K3. I can
jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY [most of the time], I've
worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and
it's generally hard to hold a run frequency when a band opens strongly. What
size is this station? Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so
noted g. How about your station? 
Happy 4th.

...robert
-- 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting

2012-07-03 Thread Howard Sherer
The CW delay is not the issue but the delay fore the amplifier keyeng 
circuit. It is always set for QSK and dose not follow the delay that is 
set for the CW break in.

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

2012-07-03 Thread Erik Basilier
Having the same filters in both receivers, especially the cw filters, is a
good idea *if* you will use the second receiver for diversity reception.
However, I don't see why you would want both the 400 Hz and the 250 Hz
filters in any receiver, as the real bandwidth of these filters
(particularly the 250 Hz) is not close to the nominal numbers. In reality
these filters are so close in bandwidth that having both seems redundant for
most usage scenarios. If it were my rig, I would sell one of these filters
and use the proceeds to buy one filter for the second receiver.

 

73,

Erik K7TV

 

 

Based on recent comments, it seems that I may well profit from ordering the
second receiver module for my K3.

 

Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz,

8-pole)

for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver?

 

Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW

 

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Lance Collister, W7GJ
On HF I think I am a water pistol ;-(


On 7/3/2012 7:39 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote:
 Hello, all...

 I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little
 pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham
 station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a
 big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly,
 this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small
 lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w
 amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY
 [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is
 forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency
 when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes
 up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station?
 Happy 4th.

 ...robert


-- 
Lance Collister, W7GJ
(ex WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8, E51SIX, 3D2LR, 5W0GJ)
P.O. Box 73
Frenchtown, MT   59834-0073
USA
TEL: (406) 626-5728
QTH: DN27ub
URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj
Windows Messenger: w...@hotmail.com
Skype: lanceW7GJ
2m DXCC #11/6m DXCC #815

Interested in 6m EME?  Ask me about subscribing to the Magic Band EME
email group, or just fill in the request box at the bottom of my web
page (above)!

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Dale Putnam

I was thinking... maybe a rock and string? oh.. I know it isn't a pistol.. 
but sometimes I can hit thingsdoes that count??
--...   ...--
Dale - WC7S in Wy
  Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 22:00:17 +
 From: w...@q.com
 To: rc...@verizon.net
 CC: elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size
 
 On HF I think I am a water pistol ;-(
 
 
 On 7/3/2012 7:39 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote:
  Hello, all...
 
  I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little
  pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham
  station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a
  big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly,
  this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small
  lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w
  amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY
  [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is
  forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency
  when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes
  up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station?
  Happy 4th.
 
  ...robert
 
 
 -- 
 Lance Collister, W7GJ
 (ex WA3GPL, WA1JXN, WA1JXN/C6A, ZF2OC/ZF8, E51SIX, 3D2LR, 5W0GJ)
 P.O. Box 73
 Frenchtown, MT   59834-0073
 USA
 TEL: (406) 626-5728
 QTH: DN27ub
 URL: http://www.bigskyspaces.com/w7gj
 Windows Messenger: w...@hotmail.com
 Skype: lanceW7GJ
 2m DXCC #11/6m DXCC #815
 
 Interested in 6m EME?  Ask me about subscribing to the Magic Band EME
 email group, or just fill in the request box at the bottom of my web
 page (above)!
 
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
  
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Considering the second receiver and 6m preamp

2012-07-03 Thread Ron D'Eau Claire
Absolutely -- And remember that the receive bandwidth is *not* defined by
these filters. The bandwidth is established by the DSP filters. The crystal
filters come into play only if there is a signal so extremely strong that it
can overwhelm the DSP. The function of the crystal filters is to reduce the
strength of such a signal so that it can be handled by the DSP filters. 

73, Ron AC7AC

-Original Message-
Having the same filters in both receivers, especially the cw filters, is a
good idea *if* you will use the second receiver for diversity reception.
However, I don't see why you would want both the 400 Hz and the 250 Hz
filters in any receiver, as the real bandwidth of these filters
(particularly the 250 Hz) is not close to the nominal numbers. In reality
these filters are so close in bandwidth that having both seems redundant for
most usage scenarios. If it were my rig, I would sell one of these filters
and use the proceeds to buy one filter for the second receiver.

73,

Erik K7TV

Am I correct that I should also order the same filters (400 Hz/250 Hz,

8-pole)

for the sub-receiver that I have in the main receiver?

 

Thanks and 72/73 de Jim - AD6CW

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Larry Makoski
On 7/3/2012 3:39 PM, Robert G. Strickland wrote:
 Hello, all...

 I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little
 pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham
 station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a
 big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly,
 this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small
 lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w
 amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY
 [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is
 forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency
 when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes
 up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station?
 Happy 4th.

 ...robert

Finally, as in the lowest output used to be referred to as a peanut 
whistle.

Larry W2LJ

-- 
73 de Larry W2LJ
QRP - When you care to send the very least!

http://w2lj.blogspot.com/
http://www.w2lj.qrpradio.com/

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Mike Morrow
And this exercise serves what purpose?

Mike / KK5F
Non-PhD


-Original Message-
From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net
Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

Hello, all...

I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little 
pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham 
station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a 
big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, 
this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small 
lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w 
amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY 
[most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is 
forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency 
when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes 
up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? 
Happy 4th.

...robert
-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Cameron Haines
Hey Guys,

Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked 
all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. 

Any ideas where to go from here?

Thanks,
Cameron
AE5UZ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Mike Morrow
Any idea what the model designation is?


-Original Message-
From: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com
Sent: Jul 3, 2012 6:28 PM
To: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

Hey Guys,

Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked 
all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on 
startup. 

Any ideas where to go from here?

Thanks,
Cameron
AE5UZ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

[Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Cameron Haines
Correction.


Hey Guys,

Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked 
all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on startup. 

Any ideas where to go from here?

Thanks,
Cameron
AE5UZ
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread David Moorman
Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually 
oscillating?  

Dave K9SW



On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Correction.
 
 
 Hey Guys,
 
 Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
 and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
 counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked 
 all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on 
 startup. 
 
 Any ideas where to go from here?
 
 Thanks,
 Cameron
 AE5UZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] Amplifier keying line delay setting

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Howard,

Read the manual carefully - it says that the delay is the time for the 
receiver to *unmute* - it does not claim to extend the Keyout time.

Now, having said that, there is nothing wrong with appealing to Wayne 
and other designers to have it also apply to the Keyout timing.

73,
Don W3FPR
On 7/3/2012 4:57 PM, Howard Sherer wrote:
 The CW delay is not the issue but the delay fore the amplifier keyeng
 circuit. It is always set for QSK and dose not follow the delay that is
 set for the CW break in.

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread KQ8M
Injection of a little humor from time to time is not a bad thing. Well, for 
most of us.

73,
Tim Herrick, KQ8M
Charter Member North Coast Contesters
k...@kq8m.com

K3 Serial #5934

AR-Cluster V6 kq8m.no-ip.org
User Ports: 23, 7373  with local skimmer, 7374 without local skimmer
Server Ports: V6 3607, V4 Active 3605, V4 Passive 3606



-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net 
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Mike Morrow
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:26 PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

And this exercise serves what purpose?

Mike / KK5F
Non-PhD


-Original Message-
From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net
Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

Hello, all...

I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little 
pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham 
station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a 
big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, 
this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small 
lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w 
amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY 
[most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is 
forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency 
when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes 
up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? 
Happy 4th.

...robert
-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Cameron,

In order to calibrate the 4 MHz reference as stated, you must have a 
very accurate frequency counter (the first bullet), or you can listen 
with another calibrated receiver (2nd bullet), or you can just do as the 
3rd bullet indicates and set the C22 trimmer to center.  Whichever you 
use will not change the rest of your bringup of the K2.  When you have 
all bands working, I do encourage you to do a good dial frequency 
calibration - see my website www.w3fpr.com article for the procedure.

OK, now back to your problem.  I am not certain from your words, but I 
assume you read all zeros in the K2 display when you attempt CAL FCTR 
and the probe in TP3.  That may mean that the PLL reference oscillator 
is not working, or it could mean that your counter probe is not working.

If that is the case, try the probe in TP2 to see if you can read the BFO 
frequency.  If both TP2 and TP3 show all zeros, I would conclude that 
you have a faulty internal frequency probe or problems with Q9 and Q10 
on the Control Board.

If you have a good BFO frequency response at TP2, but all zeros at TP3, 
that means the PLL reference oscillator is not working.  Go to the 
schematic (RF Board sheet 1 of 4) and look in the upper left corner.  
The components shown there (over to but not including U4) are the ones 
you need to check for good soldering, and the diodes for proper 
orientation.  If you need help with diode orientation, look at the parts 
placement diagram in the back of the manual.  Then move on to the DC 
voltage measurements for Q19 to see if all looks well there.

You will need to get some reasonably proper frequency readout from TP3 
(The next and more important step is the PLL range which is the test in 
the right column).  That must be correct before moving on.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 7/3/2012 7:41 PM, Cameron Haines wrote:
 Correction.


 Hey Guys,

 Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
 and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
 counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked 
 all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on 
 startup.

 Any ideas where to go from here?

 Thanks,
 Cameron
 AE5UZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread cq_dx_de_aa0aa
It serves to pass the time until our KX3s are delivered!
Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de Telcel

-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrow k...@earthlink.net
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:25:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
To: Elecraftelecraft@mailman.qth.net
Reply-To: Mike Morrow k...@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

And this exercise serves what purpose?

Mike / KK5F
Non-PhD


-Original Message-
From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net
Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

Hello, all...

I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little 
pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham 
station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a 
big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, 
this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small 
lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w 
amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY 
[most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is 
forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency 
when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes 
up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station? 
Happy 4th.

...robert
-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Cameron Haines
Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why 
the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm.

Thanks David!



 From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net
To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com 
Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2  Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
 
Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually 
oscillating?  

Dave K9SW



On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Correction.
 
 
 Hey Guys,
 
 Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
 and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
 counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. Checked 
 all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message on 
 startup. 
 
 Any ideas where to go from here?
 
 Thanks,
 Cameron
 AE5UZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 
 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Cameron,

Read my last post carefully.  Then tell us whether you are seeing all 
zeros when plugged into TP3 and in CAL FCTR.  If you have all zeros, 
either your probe is bad or your PLL reference is not oscillating.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 7/3/2012 8:40 PM, Cameron Haines wrote:
 Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why 
 the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm.

 Thanks David!


 
   From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net
 To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2  Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
   
 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually 
 oscillating?

 Dave K9SW



 On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Correction.


 Hey Guys,

 Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
 and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
 counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. 
 Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message 
 on startup.

 Any ideas where to go from here?

 Thanks,
 Cameron
 AE5UZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread Gary Gregory
*Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible
issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio
from the K3 I thought I would mention the subsequent test I tried.

1. Check that both BNC connectors were 'seated correctly'
2. Replace the Elecraft supplied BNC inter-connect cable
3. Relocate the P3 from it's position on the desk.

None of these appears to have resolved the issue..which does not disappoint
me one bit. After all, it IS a desired 'feature' for me.

It appears that if the P3 is placed on the left side and on top of the
KPA-500 there may be some 'leakage' getting into the P3 and showing up on
the P3 display as TX audio. This may be the root cause?

Whilst this does not happen on every transmission, and is not deliberately
repeatable, it does show up several times a day and I think it's rather
cool even if not consistent which would be even nicer.

I know many have asked for this to be a standard feature of the P3 and I
also note that Alan (N1AL) has stated this is not an easy option and I got
the impression it most likely would not be done in the near future...read
years?

For those of us with not so good hearing when it comes to the voice
spectrum, this is a way for us to check on our transmitted signal and not
need to wait for a negative comment or intrude on a QSO and inquire if our
TX audio is OK. Given the lack of operators who would be either unable to
give an accurate description of the audio, or indeed the sometimes abrupt
response received and in many cases the other station has tailored his
receive audio to best suit his/her hearing, I will take advantage of this
anomaly for now and enjoy it.

Thanks for the BW...:-)

73

Gary
*
-- 
Gary
VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
Elecraft Equipment
K3 #679,P3 #1629, KPA-500 #018 KAT-500#??
Living the dream!!!
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Fred Townsend
I have a bazooka match. Does that mean I'm a big gun?

-Original Message-
From: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
[mailto:elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
cq_dx_de_aa...@yahoo.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 5:39 PM
To: Elecraft
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

It serves to pass the time until our KX3s are delivered!
Enviado desde mi oficina móvil BlackBerry® de Telcel

-Original Message-
From: Mike Morrow k...@earthlink.net
Sender: elecraft-boun...@mailman.qth.net
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:25:54 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
To: Elecraftelecraft@mailman.qth.net
Reply-To: Mike Morrow k...@arrl.net
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

And this exercise serves what purpose?

Mike / KK5F
Non-PhD


-Original Message-
From: Robert G. Strickland rc...@verizon.net
Sent: Jul 3, 2012 2:39 PM
To: Elecraft elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

Hello, all...

I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little 
pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham 
station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a 
big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly, 
this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a 
small lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 
500w amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from 
WNY [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 
5Band-DXCC is forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a 
run frequency when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? 
Anyone who comes up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your
station?
Happy 4th.

...robert
--
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY rc...@verizon.net Syracuse, New 
York, USA

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email 
list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger

2012-07-03 Thread Daniel B. Curtis
I also found it hard to remove the batteries from the holders.
The 4 slots (2 on each holder) at the end of each holder have retainers.
Either my fingers are starting to age, or these are hard to remove.

Dan
N6WN
-
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:49:47 -0700
From: Erik Basilier ebasil...@cox.net
Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger
To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
Message-ID: 008101cd58ce$e459a580$ad0cf080$@net
Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

JP wrote: All battery packs, regardless of chemistry, benefit from a
periodic balance/equalize charge.



Do you have any specific recommendation on how often one needs to take out
the NiMH batteries to balance them?

The KX3 battery holders are very solid (good) but I find it difficult to
remove the batteries, as significant force is needed. I have a set of NiMH
in there, and my default plan is to just leave them there for as long as
possible. I hope I can install the charger when it arrives without removing
the batteries. And, I am running on external power whenever I can, so that
the internal batteries won't need to be charged until the internal charger
arrives.



73,

Erik K7TV
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Cameron Haines
Don,

Great advice. I wasn't able to construct the probe for the frequency counter; 
missing the capacitor in the kit, either lost it or wasn't included. 

I decided to use a external counter instead. Now, if I simply jumper P6 to T2 
and T3, I do get a reading, though sure its inaccurate, but reading 
nonetheless. I will email Elecraft for missing capacitor. In the interim, do 
you have a suggestion or replacement cap that will give same or near results 
until part comes in or another work-around?

Cameron



 From: Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com
To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com 
Cc: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2  Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
 
Cameron,

Read my last post carefully.  Then tell us whether you are seeing all 
zeros when plugged into TP3 and in CAL FCTR.  If you have all zeros, 
either your probe is bad or your PLL reference is not oscillating.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 7/3/2012 8:40 PM, Cameron Haines wrote:
 Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder why 
 the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm.

 Thanks David!


 
   From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net
 To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2  Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
  
 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is actually 
 oscillating?

 Dave K9SW



 On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Correction.


 Hey Guys,

 Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator calibration 
 and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different frequency 
 counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been good. 
 Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error message 
 on startup.

 Any ideas where to go from here?

 Thanks,
 Cameron
 AE5UZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread Guy Olinger K2AV
Wouldn't part of displaying the TX signal have to be implemented in the K3?
 If so it's a TWO box modification.  Fix the K3 to send the TX signal
across the connector to the P3 instead of the RX bandwidth.  Then the P3
would need to switch to the bandwidth needed to display the TX signal when
the K3 was in transmit.  This last because most of the time we are watching
on the P3 where we are NOT listening with the K3.

Some other way to do that?  73, Guy.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Gary Gregory garyvk...@gmail.com wrote:

 *Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible
 issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio
 from the K3 I thought I would mention the subsequent test I tried.

 1. Check that both BNC connectors were 'seated correctly'
 2. Replace the Elecraft supplied BNC inter-connect cable
 3. Relocate the P3 from it's position on the desk.

 None of these appears to have resolved the issue..which does not disappoint
 me one bit. After all, it IS a desired 'feature' for me.

 It appears that if the P3 is placed on the left side and on top of the
 KPA-500 there may be some 'leakage' getting into the P3 and showing up on
 the P3 display as TX audio. This may be the root cause?

 Whilst this does not happen on every transmission, and is not deliberately
 repeatable, it does show up several times a day and I think it's rather
 cool even if not consistent which would be even nicer.

 I know many have asked for this to be a standard feature of the P3 and I
 also note that Alan (N1AL) has stated this is not an easy option and I got
 the impression it most likely would not be done in the near future...read
 years?

 For those of us with not so good hearing when it comes to the voice
 spectrum, this is a way for us to check on our transmitted signal and not
 need to wait for a negative comment or intrude on a QSO and inquire if our
 TX audio is OK. Given the lack of operators who would be either unable to
 give an accurate description of the audio, or indeed the sometimes abrupt
 response received and in many cases the other station has tailored his
 receive audio to best suit his/her hearing, I will take advantage of this
 anomaly for now and enjoy it.

 Thanks for the BW...:-)

 73

 Gary
 *
 --
 Gary
 VK4FD - Motorhome Mobile
 Elecraft Equipment
 K3 #679,P3 #1629, KPA-500 #018 KAT-500#??
 Living the dream!!!
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Robert G. Strickland
As originator of this thread and mindful of bandwidth, let's reflect on 
what has transpired and bring things to a peaceful conclusion. Thanks 
for all comments.

...robert

On 7/3/2012 20:39, Robert G. Strickland wrote:
 Hello, all...

 I made a comment in another thread that my station was a little
 pistol. That got me thinking and wondering about how to size a ham
 station. Big Guns are rather obvious. Now, how about a small gun, a
 big pistol, a little pistol, and finally bow and arrow? Clearly,
 this is very subjective, For example, my station: in the city on a small
 lot, SkyHawk at 60ft, 80/40m compromise wires, nothing on 160m, 500w
 amp, and K3. I can jst get into the top 10 in the CQWWcw from WNY
 [most of the time], I've worked 335 DX on assorted bands, 5Band-DXCC is
 forever waiting on 80m, and it's generally hard to hold a run frequency
 when a band opens strongly. What size is this station? Anyone who comes
 up with pea shooter will be so noted g. How about your station?
 Happy 4th.

 ...robert


-- 
Robert G. Strickland, PhD, ABPH - KE2WY
rc...@verizon.net
Syracuse, New York, USA


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Cameron,

Yes, do get the capacitor for the probe, you will need it for your 
filter alignment even if you do not choose to follow my instructions for 
achieving good K2 Dial Calibration.  Any 10 pF capacitor will do, but 
the axial one is better physically - it fits nicely under the heat 
shrink.  I have a few counter probes with lumps because I substituted 
10 pF disc ceramics for the axial capacitors.  Note that I lose probes 
often - or more correctly, I leave them in my customer's K2s, so when I 
ger down to a qwuantity of one, I build another from whatever materials 
I have at hand - there is no magic it is just a shielded wire with a 
10 pF capacitor at the probe end. BTW, a #14 AWG wire fits the probe 
sockets very nicely if you are inclined toward building your own probe 
tip.  A small amount of grinding/filing will round the tip.

Just jumpering between CB P6 and RF board TP2 or TP3 can lead to 
erroneous readings because any DC present is not being blocked, and that 
can skew the readings.

If you have an external frequency counter, you can move on to the PLL 
range tests and the BFO range tests using the external counter rather 
than the internal one.  Don't worry about the 4 MHZ reference for now 
(it may end up being slightly different than exactly 4.0 MHZ) - just set 
the trimmer slot as indicated by bullet 3.



On 7/3/2012 9:33 PM, Cameron Haines wrote:
 Don,

 Great advice. I wasn't able to construct the probe for the frequency counter; 
 missing the capacitor in the kit, either lost it or wasn't included.

 I decided to use a external counter instead. Now, if I simply jumper P6 to T2 
 and T3, I do get a reading, though sure its inaccurate, but reading 
 nonetheless. I will email Elecraft for missing capacitor. In the interim, do 
 you have a suggestion or replacement cap that will give same or near results 
 until part comes in or another work-around?

 Cameron


 
   From: Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com
 To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com
 Cc: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net; elecraft@mailman.qth.net 
 elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 8:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2  Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3
   
 Cameron,

 Read my last post carefully.  Then tell us whether you are seeing all
 zeros when plugged into TP3 and in CAL FCTR.  If you have all zeros,
 either your probe is bad or your PLL reference is not oscillating.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 On 7/3/2012 8:40 PM, Cameron Haines wrote:
 Great suggestion. I can hear it a 4Mhz now.. from my Softrock SDR. Wonder 
 why the Freq counters couldn't pick it up however. hmm.

 Thanks David!


 
 From: David Moorman dmoorm...@comcast.net
 To: Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com
 Cc: elecraft@mailman.qth.net elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2012 7:03 PM
 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2  Alignment and Test, Part II - No signal on TP3

 Do you have a receiver you can listen on to see if the oscillator is 
 actually oscillating?

 Dave K9SW



 On Jul 3, 2012, at 6:41 PM, Cameron Haines camhai...@yahoo.com wrote:

 Correction.


 Hey Guys,

 Well, I am at the part where I need to test the 4 MHz oscillator 
 calibration and ran into a snag. I am not getting anything on two different 
 frequency counters when connected to TP3. Test up to this point have been 
 good. Checked all the components around X1 and all look correct. No error 
 message on startup.

 Any ideas where to go from here?

 Thanks,
 Cameron
 AE5UZ
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html

 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread Bob
Makes you wonder what the IR port on the back of the P3 was planned for (TX
RF Sampler Pickup maybe)?

73, Bob, WB4SON
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Dan,

Let me start with a smart comment - not all things in life are easy.

The batteries should be hard to remove because of the spring tension - 
if it were easy, than the contact pressure would be questionable.

As far as your fingers aging, while that may be true, I don't think that 
is a major factor here - it just makes plain sense to have adequate 
spring pressure on the battery contacts.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 7/3/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel B. Curtis wrote:
 I also found it hard to remove the batteries from the holders.
 The 4 slots (2 on each holder) at the end of each holder have retainers.
 Either my fingers are starting to age, or these are hard to remove.

 Dan
 N6WN
 -
 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:49:47 -0700
 From: Erik Basilier ebasil...@cox.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID: 008101cd58ce$e459a580$ad0cf080$@net
 Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

 JP wrote: All battery packs, regardless of chemistry, benefit from a
 periodic balance/equalize charge.



 Do you have any specific recommendation on how often one needs to take out
 the NiMH batteries to balance them?

 The KX3 battery holders are very solid (good) but I find it difficult to
 remove the batteries, as significant force is needed. I have a set of NiMH
 in there, and my default plan is to just leave them there for as long as
 possible. I hope I can install the charger when it arrives without removing
 the batteries. And, I am running on external power whenever I can, so that
 the internal batteries won't need to be charged until the internal charger
 arrives.



 73,

 Erik K7TV
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Guy,

That would still only give a picture of the K3 output as found by the IF 
leak-through signal.  I think a better approach is to wait until the 
external sensor is developed and released - that will show the real 
signal going out to the antenna.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 7/3/2012 9:55 PM, Guy Olinger K2AV wrote:
 Wouldn't part of displaying the TX signal have to be implemented in the K3?
   If so it's a TWO box modification.  Fix the K3 to send the TX signal
 across the connector to the P3 instead of the RX bandwidth.  Then the P3
 would need to switch to the bandwidth needed to display the TX signal when
 the K3 was in transmit.  This last because most of the time we are watching
 on the P3 where we are NOT listening with the K3.

 Some other way to do that?  73, Guy.



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] OT - station pistol size

2012-07-03 Thread Tony Estep
Bob, all I can say is that if you have a 3-element Yagi at 60 ft., nothing
you can do or say will make you anything but a big howitzer as viewed from
the perspective of those of us at the bottom of the pileup.

Tony KT0NY

-- 
http://www.isb.edu/faculty/facultydir.aspx?ddlFaculty=352
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger

2012-07-03 Thread Daniel B. Curtis
Thanks Don,
The two batteries inside each holder are easy to take out. The two
batteries on the outside of each holder are more difficult.  It is not a
function of the spring tension ... Probably assuming the spring tension is
the same for each battery, it is the shape of the holder.

That said, the fix is to put a silk ribbon under the outside batteries ...
As has been suggested.

Dan
N6WN
On Jul 3, 2012 7:20 PM, Don Wilhelm w3...@embarqmail.com wrote:

 Dan,

 Let me start with a smart comment - not all things in life are easy.

 The batteries should be hard to remove because of the spring tension - if
 it were easy, than the contact pressure would be questionable.

 As far as your fingers aging, while that may be true, I don't think that
 is a major factor here - it just makes plain sense to have adequate spring
 pressure on the battery contacts.

 73,
 Don W3FPR

 On 7/3/2012 9:32 PM, Daniel B. Curtis wrote:

 I also found it hard to remove the batteries from the holders.
 The 4 slots (2 on each holder) at the end of each holder have retainers.
 Either my fingers are starting to age, or these are hard to remove.

 Dan
 N6WN
 --**---
 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 20:49:47 -0700
 From: Erik Basilier ebasil...@cox.net
 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 interal battery charger
 To: Elecraft@mailman.qth.net
 Message-ID: 008101cd58ce$e459a580$**ad0cf080$@net
 Content-Type: text/plain;   charset=us-ascii

 JP wrote: All battery packs, regardless of chemistry, benefit from a
 periodic balance/equalize charge.



 Do you have any specific recommendation on how often one needs to take out
 the NiMH batteries to balance them?

 The KX3 battery holders are very solid (good) but I find it difficult to
 remove the batteries, as significant force is needed. I have a set of NiMH
 in there, and my default plan is to just leave them there for as long as
 possible. I hope I can install the charger when it arrives without
 removing
 the batteries. And, I am running on external power whenever I can, so that
 the internal batteries won't need to be charged until the internal charger
 arrives.



 73,

 Erik K7TV
 __**__**__
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: 
 http://mailman.qth.net/**mailman/listinfo/elecrafthttp://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.**htmhttp://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:elecr...@mailman.qth.**net Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html




__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] K2 CAT Command Question

2012-07-03 Thread Tom KG3V
I am trying to change the INP Menu setting on a remotely-operated K2. It is
currently in the Paddle-reverse mode, and I need to change it to HAND.
Looking at the K2 Programmer's Reference Manual, It looks like I can send
SW41;UP; or SW41;SW01; to do this. When I send these commands using Han
Radio Deluxe, I get an [error] returned and the value does not change.

Can anyone see a mistake in my commands? Probably missing something obvious.

73,

Tom, KG3V


--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K2-CAT-Command-Question-tp7558597.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread Alan Bloom
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:03 +1000, Gary Gregory wrote:
 *Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible
 issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio
 from the K3 ...

I should have copied the list on my previous reply to Gary.  (See below)

Alan N1AL

 Forwarded Message 
From: Alan Bloom n...@sonic.net
 Reply-to: n...@sonic.net
 To: Gary Gregory garyvk...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: Fwd: Screen Shots showing TX signal appearing on P3
 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:07:08 -0700
 
 Hi Gary,
 
 The P3 is supposed to blank the screen whenever the K3 goes into
 transmit mode.  If that's not happening then it sounds like there must
 be an RS-232 communications problem between the K3 and P3.  One
 possibility is if you have some third-party software program running
 on the PC that is overloading the RS-232 capacity by sending large
 volumes of commands to the K3.  For example Ham Radio Deluxe is known
 to do that, depending on its settings.
 
 If you want to see the IF leakage during transmit you can do that by
 disconnecting the RS-232 cable.  Another way is to change the Xcvr
 Sel menu selection to 8215 kHz (inverted) instead of K3.
 
 I've been resisting making that an official feature because it really
 isn't very reliable.  It depends on random leakage through the mixer
 and PIN diode switches in the K3, which are unspecified.  It also
 varies with band and transmit power level and may result in too small
 a signal to be useful under some conditions.
 
 The plan is to include a modulation monitor function with the future
 external power sensor option.  I've had the hardware done for months
 but have been too busy with the SVGA development to have time to do
 the firmware.  Real Soon Now.  :=)
 
 Alan N1AL


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] K2 CAT Command Question

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
Tom,

It may be an HRD problem or a problem with a USB to serial adapter. What 
happens if you issue the command with K3 Utility terminal page.  That 
will tell you whether to look toward the K3 for the solution or toward HRD.

Are you running HRD through LP-Bridge?   If so, that is another possible 
block.  90% of the K3 commands work through LP-Bridge, but not all - 
this may be one of them (I really don't know, I am just guessing).

73,
Don W3FPR

lOn 7/3/2012 10:44 PM, Tom KG3V wrote:
 I am trying to change the INP Menu setting on a remotely-operated K2. It is
 currently in the Paddle-reverse mode, and I need to change it to HAND.
 Looking at the K2 Programmer's Reference Manual, It looks like I can send
 SW41;UP; or SW41;SW01; to do this. When I send these commands using Han
 Radio Deluxe, I get an [error] returned and the value does not change.

 Can anyone see a mistake in my commands? Probably missing something obvious.


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] KX3 Amp keying

2012-07-03 Thread Sid Leben
In a much earlier question I had asked Wayne if the KX3 would be able to key 
the Juma PA100D amplifier. He responded with a yes..
I tried it today with a cable from KX3 ACC2 to the T/R input on the Juma amp.  
Yes it did key the amp, but when connected there was an appreciable receive 
loss on the KX3.  I am guessing, but in the order of 20-30db.

What am I missing here ?  I'll take another look at it tomorrow…

Sid
KC2EE
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Amp keying

2012-07-03 Thread Don Wilhelm
That sounds like  Juma amp problem to me.  The antenna to KX3 loss 
during receive should be zero or close to it.  Sounds like you need to 
consult with Customer Support at Juma.

73,
Don W3FPR

On 7/3/2012 11:38 PM, Sid Leben wrote:
 In a much earlier question I had asked Wayne if the KX3 would be able to key 
 the Juma PA100D amplifier. He responded with a yes..
 I tried it today with a cable from KX3 ACC2 to the T/R input on the Juma amp. 
  Yes it did key the amp, but when connected there was an appreciable receive 
 loss on the KX3.  I am guessing, but in the order of 20-30db.

 What am I missing here ?  I'll take another look at it tomorrow…

 Sid
 KC2EE
 __
 Elecraft mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
 Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

 This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
 Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html



__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


Re: [Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread vk4tux
Gary, I had replied to your post, perhaps it went to you direct and I am on
your naughty list ? ;)

Anyhow if the K3 baud rate (rs-232 config) is not 38400 then that will do
it.

Some versions of firmware in the past would sync the K3-P3 to 38400, but I
am not sure now.
Anyhow check the baud rate. I used that trick with a PF assigned to change
K3 baud rate to other than 38400 to chk my TX. It was good for one over and
then would re-sync back to 38400. 

cheers

Adrian

--
View this message in context: 
http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/P3-TX-Audio-monitoring-tp7558585p7558602.html
Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html


[Elecraft] P3 TX Audio monitoring

2012-07-03 Thread Richard Fjeld
*Well as nobody responded to my original post which identified a possible
issue with my station setup which allowed the P3 to display live TX audio
from the K3 I thought I would mention the subsequent test I tried.

Gary,

I'll respond.  What you are seeing is normal.  It happens on my P3 at times.  I 
would like to have it be user selectable, or better yet, full time.  

We can disconnect the serial cable (if memory serves me) to monitor our Tx at 
present. But as I see it happening at times, I realize that it could be 
provided to us.  

I like seeing my signal displayed so that I know I have a clean signal with 
straight skirts, and if the audio needs equalizing, etc.

Richard Fjeld, NØCE


__
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft@mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html