RE: exchange 2000 databases
Well, I just created a second storage group on a server, and it didn't create any stores by default, so it looks like I don't actually need to delete a public store. I assume that it automatically creates a mailbox and public store only for the first storage group. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: exchange 2000 databases Cmon Ed, you know reading between the lines is REQUIRED reading for MS products -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: August 23, 2001 11:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: exchange 2000 databases That's REALLY reading between the lines! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Ellis Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: exchange 2000 databases I've just read in a Compaq document that 'There can be only one public folder store in the cluster. After adding additional exchange resource groups, you must delete the public folder store in new groups before you bring the groups online' Reading between the lines, does this mean that I can have 5 mailbox databases per Storage group, instead of 4 and a PF database, in all but the 1st storage group? Therefore, on a 3 virtual server cluster, say I have 3 storage groups per VS, so 9 in all. One has 4 mailbox DBs and a PF DB, the rest have 5 mailbox DBs. Seems like that one PF database is going to have to be able to take all the PFs. Good thing we don't have many. I also guess that means that the free/busy info for the whole cluster user base is on 1 VS. Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site
Are all the ADC connection agreements two-way is the config connection agreement running ok? -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 August 2001 05:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site It is happening with all 5.5 mailboxes. Thanks for the link - I'll check it out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty Sent: Friday, 24 August 2001 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site Hi Duane, Is this happening for a particular X5.5 mailbox only? We didn't have the exact same error, but when X2K users could not send to X5.5 users I solve the problem by moving the 5.5 user to 2K and then back. Not exactly sure why that helped but I guess it was something to do with the legacyExchageDN attribute. Also see http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q176/4/89.ASP?LN=EN-US; SD=g nFR=0qry=An%20error%20occurred%20while%20ASN.1%20was%20decoding%20an%2 0obj ectrnk=2src=DHCS_MSPSS_gn_SRCHSPR=MSALL Sakti -Original Message- From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 24 August 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems sending email from E2K to E5.5 in same Exchange Site Hi all, I am having the following message flow problems with my exchange 5.5/exchange 2000 and I cannot find any help on this particular Event ID 200. The 5.5 mailbox is otherwise fully operational. Any thoughts would be appreciated. Can send email from, 5.5 recipient E2k recipient [OK] E2k recipient 5.5 recipient [No NDR Event ID 200 logged on 5.5 server] Event ID: 200 Type: Warning Source: MSExchangeMTA Category: X.400 Service Description: An error occurred while ASN.1 was decoding an object (dump reference 22). [no match on child 134 2914 1msev 22 MTA XFER-IN 10 98] (14) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC, unless specifically stated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Join 5.5 to 2K site
As long as the E2K Organization has not been switched to native mode you shouldn't have a problem AFAIK. Regards Peter Johnson -Original Message- From: goran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 August 2001 19:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Join 5.5 to 2K site Does anyone know if you can join a 5.5 server to a 2K site. I have a 2K test domain setup and I want to do the following: Create NT domain and build 5.5 server in it and then join ex2k site. Is this possible, thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail may contain confidential information and may be legally privileged and is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that you may not use, distribute or copy this document in any manner whatsoever. Kindly also notify the sender immediately by telephone, and delete the e-mail. When addressed to Internet Solutions' clients any opinion or advice contained in this e-mail is subject to the terms and conditions expressed in any applicable terms of business or client engagement letter. Internet Solutions does not accept liability for any damage, loss or expense arising from this e-mail and/or from the accessing of any files attached to this e-mail. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: 535 errors in security log
We did a little more t/s last night. Had a user who left their NT w/s locked for a week while out of town on a conference. During that week we think the password expired. No stuck keyboard of process or any kind of coding running. The user does NOT have an exchange mailbox. We have two email systems here, Notes being the other. However, he did have Outlook installed. We automatically build an outlook profile for users based on the NT login ID which matches the mailbox alias. While we were getting the errors, I was unable to check the outlook profile properties. The panel just kept hanging. We then set the password in the account domain to never expire. The 535 errors immediately went away. At that point I was able to get into the outlook profile properties and view all the configuration setups. The conclusion thus far is that Outlook was trying to match up the alias to the address box and kept failing because of the expired password and the fact that there is no mailbox for that user. Did not realize that even though Outlook is not running, it still has a portion of itself that is actively talking to the exchange servers. I am not sure if this falls under the category of bug or feature. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Perzactly - a process rather than a person is doing it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Also, make sure that nobody is writing code that connects to your Exchange Server for sending emails. Their process may be trying to login with wrong credentials. S. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Could NAV be trying to open mailboxes with invalid credentials? I don't use it, not sure how it works. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log Nope, vanilla exch 5.5 server. Not even any connectors. We do have NAVMSE running. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Anything else running on that exchange server? Fax? Virus scanner? -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log Have not spoken to Joes. We get this error for multiple people. Some on laptops, some working home, some at the office. There is no common thread that I have been able to discover. We use NT 4 w/s and use the built in screensaver. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Sounds like a process rather than a user is causing that. For example, I run a screensaver package that requires you to enter your LAN password rather than some silly one-character windows password, and if the spacebar (or any repeating key) on the keyboard is stuck down or depressed (like by a chair arm) we will get thousands of these logon failures until the service Dr. Watsons. Have you spoken to JoeS? Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Out think, Out smart, Out medicate - Steinvivor -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 535 errors in security log NT SP6a ExchSP4 - audit turned on for log on failures and successes - mandated by security guidelines. Exchange is in a resource domain and user accounts are in the Account domain. Resource domain trusts account domain with a one way trust. Over the last couple of weeks I am getting hundreds of 535 errors every MINUTE in the NT Security event logs on the resource domain controllers that house the exchange system. This has the effect of eating up space on the server due to the fact that we have to keep all of out logs around for a while. The server guys swear that it is an Outlook/Exchange issue since they are not seeing the errors on the account domain controllers log files. Poked around MS KB and also Google, however was not able to find anything. Does anyone have any ideas? Event Type: Failure Audit Event Source: Security Event Category: Logon/Logoff Event ID: 535 Date:
secondary domain inbound failing
I have an Echange 5.5 server with the following entries in the IMS routing tab: Sent to Route to mydomain1.com inbound mydomain2.com inbound The server has been rebooted since that entry was made. I get mail on the first domain, but I get this when I send mail to the second domain from the outside: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:48:57 -0400 (EDT) from mailgate@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.mydomain1.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 not local host mydomain2.com, not a gateway 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown The mailbox insideuser exists, and his outbound tail is set to mydomain2.com. It looks like there is an attempt to deliver to the Exchange server, but the server refuses to recognize the user. The same user receives mail regularly at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is wrong here ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
Fear not. I have four - though I was declared legally insane sometime ago... Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least one of these. They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC to win. Visit http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more information and to enter. There are 10 categories: - Best Solution by a Partner - Best Solution by a Customer - Best Developer Tool - Best Infrastructure Product - Best Management Tool or Utility - Best Use of Mobile Technologies - Best Productivity Solution - Best Use of Workflow - Best Vertical-focused Solution - Best Use of XML Please see the Web site for more information. Earnie Glazener Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing contact files
I think you'll find that most of the people here are actually very nice and helpful. Stick around for awhile, and answer some Hanji questions and all of this will make sense. Its really nothing personal. You never did tell us whether the issue has been resolved or not..- or perhaps I missed it. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files After my experience, I would agree that that is true for some of the participants. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files I remember back in my earlier days asking if there was an Exch group. People would say well there the Swynk one, but those people are mean and will tear you up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files You are so full of crap!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files People here tend to be hostile when they perceive a poster to be both clueless and argumentative. The original owner of this list used to call it arrogant ignorance. Go back and read your own posts with an open mind and maybe you'll understand what I'm telling you. Then answer the questions that are posed to you precisely. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Why are you all so HOSTILE? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files That is not a file!!! A file is a word doc, an excel spreadsheet, a PowerPoint presentation, a text document, etc... A contacts folder is that... A FOLDER, entries in that folder are called ITEMS. Get your facts straight! - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOA Anonymous - 12 step program
My name is David and I had my OOA on (wait for Hello David)... For this I apologize to everyone I offended. Luckily about 30 of you nice people were kind enough to reply and let me know the error of my ways. These responses ranged from the helpful (see below) to the profanity-laced ramblings of the incoherent. All I can say is that I have now gone the public route which I kept neglecting to do despite the simplicity of doing so but I did want to include the one set of instructions I received that actually were intended for good (thanks Michèle). As for allowing internet OOA replies... In a field such as the legal one it's simply not an option to prevent them. I guess it just shows how far email has come to be accepted in the real world. My apologies once again and if anyone else is an OOA offender, they cannot say they didn't have the info. To avoid sending OOFs to mailing lists, please do the following: 1. Create a Public Folder name it whatever you want to. Make a note of its SMTP address. 2. Subscribe that SMTP address to the mailing list. 3. Set your own mail subscription to the no mail option. Then, the PF will receive all mail sent to the list since PFs can't be out of the office, they won't return OOFs. You, however, can still have OOFs set up to go to the internet (if you really want to) AND can still post to the list. Then *everyone* will be happy! -Michèle David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: secondary domain inbound failing
Have you added a secondary SMTP address for that domain, for that user? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: secondary domain inbound failing I have an Echange 5.5 server with the following entries in the IMS routing tab: Sent to Route to mydomain1.com inbound mydomain2.com inbound The server has been rebooted since that entry was made. I get mail on the first domain, but I get this when I send mail to the second domain from the outside: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:48:57 -0400 (EDT) from mailgate@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.mydomain1.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 not local host mydomain2.com, not a gateway 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown The mailbox insideuser exists, and his outbound tail is set to mydomain2.com. It looks like there is an attempt to deliver to the Exchange server, but the server refuses to recognize the user. The same user receives mail regularly at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is wrong here ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOA Anonymous - 12 step program
chorus Hi, David! /chorus I've since updated my OOF reply: 2. Subscribe that SMTP address to the mailing list. Please note: some lists require confirmation to subscribe (confirmed opt-in), so you might have to temporarily give yourself Send As permission to the PF. Hope that helps! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Didn't Rene Descartes once say - I'm Pink, Therefore I'm Spam? Chris Quinn, April 14, 2000 - -Original Message- From: Michel, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 8:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOA Anonymous - 12 step program My name is David and I had my OOA on (wait for Hello David)... For this I apologize to everyone I offended. Luckily about 30 of you nice people were kind enough to reply and let me know the error of my ways. These responses ranged from the helpful (see below) to the profanity-laced ramblings of the incoherent. All I can say is that I have now gone the public route which I kept neglecting to do despite the simplicity of doing so but I did want to include the one set of instructions I received that actually were intended for good (thanks Michèle). As for allowing internet OOA replies... In a field such as the legal one it's simply not an option to prevent them. I guess it just shows how far email has come to be accepted in the real world. My apologies once again and if anyone else is an OOA offender, they cannot say they didn't have the info. To avoid sending OOFs to mailing lists, please do the following: 1. Create a Public Folder name it whatever you want to. Make a note of its SMTP address. 2. Subscribe that SMTP address to the mailing list. 3. Set your own mail subscription to the no mail option. Then, the PF will receive all mail sent to the list since PFs can't be out of the office, they won't return OOFs. You, however, can still have OOFs set up to go to the internet (if you really want to) AND can still post to the list. Then *everyone* will be happy! -Michèle David S. Michel MCSE/CNE Systems Engineer Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. 200 East Broward Boulevard Suite 1600 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-527-2456 Direct Phone 954-333-4056 Direct Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem
Why would they crap on NT/Exchange. Although (personally) I think GroupWise/NDS is way more manageable and easy to setup/configure there is nothing wrong with Exchange/NT. If you can, get the other side to give you a copy of their gwia.cfg and then post it here...exclude the ipaddresses in the gwia and the server name and I can take a look at it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 24, 2001 12:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem I would like to do that Rocky, but then they would crap on NT/exchange stuff, so I would like to first research this and see if anyone else has seen it and fixed it or if it just will not work this way due to the attatchments being converted too many times, thanks alot for all your input sounds like you are familiar with Novell/groupwise... Do you know how to tell what is the version of owa running on the server and if their are updated files to use ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem Sounds like a misconfigured Internet access agent on their part but they may be using an even old version of the gateway called the smtp gateway. Why not have them setup GroupWise WebAcess? It takes literally 10 minutes and is secure as hell running on Netscape on Netware. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 23, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem The messages that fail such as a .doc attatchment which was forwarded from Groupwise 5.5 to Exchange 5.5 from Recipient A on groupwise to Recipient A on Exchange meaning it is the same user who has accounts on 2 different mail systems, the reason they are using OWA is that the Novell folks dont have any system set up for remote checking of mail and the users who cant open up the attatchments are in odd parts of the world , so the messages that fail always have an icon that says mime under it, then the original attatchment, these are the ones that are failing, if I take that message and save it to my disk then create a new mail it and send it to the user, meaning it wasnt being forwarded , and I log into that users owa box, it opens just fine, and it doesnt have the mime attatchement at the bottom only the original attatchment, the ones being forwarded from Groupwise 5.5 both have mime icon and attatchment icon and they fail ??? thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem First off, Have you asked the other admins on the GroupWise side to make sure they have their gwia.cfg setup properly. It should be set to send mime encoded messages only but I have seen some misconfigured ones as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 23, 2001 10:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 / On an NT 4.0 SP6 box, the problem I am having is with attatchments, another company who uses Groupwise 5.5 is automatically forwarding messages for a few mailboxes that are over on my Exchange 5.5 server, so whenever a message comes in with an attatchment it is automatically forward to company.com from Corporate.com, the users who get the following message when using Outlook Web access with IE 5.5: cannot open that type of attatcment it is unknown The OWA is on the same Exchange 5.5 server I mentioned above, so the problem looks like this ,whenever a message is forwarded with an attatchment it cannot be opened, but if I send a new message with an attatchment these OWA users dont have any problems Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
loadsim for exchange 2000
I'm getting and error: ERROR: LDAP add: (CN=Cwdim0daaa UKI-WI0-SE20,OU=UKI-WI0-SE20,OU=Loadsim Users,DC=uki,DC=private,DC=ntl,DC=com) error: Unwilling To Perform When I try to create the topology. It creates the OU's, it just seems to have a problem creating the user. Any ideas? Regards, Rob Ellis Messaging Consultant Service Delivery Solutions Programmes IBM Global Services DDI: 01256 752845 Mobile: 07796 336199 Fax: 01256 754899 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The contents of this email and any attachments are sent for the personal attention of the addressee(s) only and may be confidential. If you are not the intended addressee, any use, disclosure or copying of this email and any attachments is unauthorised - please notify the sender by return and delete the message. Any representations or commitments expressed in this email are subject to contract. ntl Group Limited _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem
We used to have attachment problems with OWA ourselves. I found if you upgrade to the latest and greatest IE Explorer all those problems seem to disappear. Have you checked with your users to ensure they have the latest and greatest IE? hth, Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem Why would they crap on NT/Exchange. Although (personally) I think GroupWise/NDS is way more manageable and easy to setup/configure there is nothing wrong with Exchange/NT. If you can, get the other side to give you a copy of their gwia.cfg and then post it here...exclude the ipaddresses in the gwia and the server name and I can take a look at it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 24, 2001 12:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem I would like to do that Rocky, but then they would crap on NT/exchange stuff, so I would like to first research this and see if anyone else has seen it and fixed it or if it just will not work this way due to the attatchments being converted too many times, thanks alot for all your input sounds like you are familiar with Novell/groupwise... Do you know how to tell what is the version of owa running on the server and if their are updated files to use ?? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem Sounds like a misconfigured Internet access agent on their part but they may be using an even old version of the gateway called the smtp gateway. Why not have them setup GroupWise WebAcess? It takes literally 10 minutes and is secure as hell running on Netscape on Netware. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 23, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem The messages that fail such as a .doc attatchment which was forwarded from Groupwise 5.5 to Exchange 5.5 from Recipient A on groupwise to Recipient A on Exchange meaning it is the same user who has accounts on 2 different mail systems, the reason they are using OWA is that the Novell folks dont have any system set up for remote checking of mail and the users who cant open up the attatchments are in odd parts of the world , so the messages that fail always have an icon that says mime under it, then the original attatchment, these are the ones that are failing, if I take that message and save it to my disk then create a new mail it and send it to the user, meaning it wasnt being forwarded , and I log into that users owa box, it opens just fine, and it doesnt have the mime attatchement at the bottom only the original attatchment, the ones being forwarded from Groupwise 5.5 both have mime icon and attatchment icon and they fail ??? thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Stefano Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem First off, Have you asked the other admins on the GroupWise side to make sure they have their gwia.cfg setup properly. It should be set to send mime encoded messages only but I have seen some misconfigured ones as well. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 23, 2001 10:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Cannot Open Attatchment problem I have an Exchange 5.5 SP4 / On an NT 4.0 SP6 box, the problem I am having is with attatchments, another company who uses Groupwise 5.5 is automatically forwarding messages for a few mailboxes that are over on my Exchange 5.5 server, so whenever a message comes in with an attatchment it is automatically forward to company.com from Corporate.com, the users who get the following message when using Outlook Web access with IE 5.5: cannot open that type of attatcment it is unknown The OWA is on the same Exchange 5.5 server I mentioned above, so the problem looks like this ,whenever a message is forwarded with an attatchment it cannot be opened, but if I send a new message with an attatchment these OWA users dont have any problems Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: secondary domain inbound failing
Exchange isn't generating the errors below. If real domains had been used, I'd tell you what server had... but it isn't Exchange. -Original Message- From: Joshua To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 8/24/2001 7:07 AM Subject: secondary domain inbound failing I have an Echange 5.5 server with the following entries in the IMS routing tab: Sent to Route to mydomain1.com inbound mydomain2.com inbound The server has been rebooted since that entry was made. I get mail on the first domain, but I get this when I send mail to the second domain from the outside: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:48:57 -0400 (EDT) from mailgate@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.mydomain1.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 not local host mydomain2.com, not a gateway 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown The mailbox insideuser exists, and his outbound tail is set to mydomain2.com. It looks like there is an attempt to deliver to the Exchange server, but the server refuses to recognize the user. The same user receives mail regularly at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is wrong here ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fish Tacos
Are you serious? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Tacos What is a standard? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 535 errors in security log
That's one to remember for sure! Also might want to investigate some of those packages that log you off after x amount of inactivity. We had to buy one and my backups have never been happier! Although I have to say I took fiendish delight in sending the BE log snippet to PST owners telling them that their PST cannot be backed up when open and if it goes south they are SOL. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Out think, Out smart, Out medicate - Steinvivor -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log We did a little more t/s last night. Had a user who left their NT w/s locked for a week while out of town on a conference. During that week we think the password expired. No stuck keyboard of process or any kind of coding running. The user does NOT have an exchange mailbox. We have two email systems here, Notes being the other. However, he did have Outlook installed. We automatically build an outlook profile for users based on the NT login ID which matches the mailbox alias. While we were getting the errors, I was unable to check the outlook profile properties. The panel just kept hanging. We then set the password in the account domain to never expire. The 535 errors immediately went away. At that point I was able to get into the outlook profile properties and view all the configuration setups. The conclusion thus far is that Outlook was trying to match up the alias to the address box and kept failing because of the expired password and the fact that there is no mailbox for that user. Did not realize that even though Outlook is not running, it still has a portion of itself that is actively talking to the exchange servers. I am not sure if this falls under the category of bug or feature. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Perzactly - a process rather than a person is doing it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Also, make sure that nobody is writing code that connects to your Exchange Server for sending emails. Their process may be trying to login with wrong credentials. S. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Could NAV be trying to open mailboxes with invalid credentials? I don't use it, not sure how it works. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log Nope, vanilla exch 5.5 server. Not even any connectors. We do have NAVMSE running. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Anything else running on that exchange server? Fax? Virus scanner? -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log Have not spoken to Joes. We get this error for multiple people. Some on laptops, some working home, some at the office. There is no common thread that I have been able to discover. We use NT 4 w/s and use the built in screensaver. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Sounds like a process rather than a user is causing that. For example, I run a screensaver package that requires you to enter your LAN password rather than some silly one-character windows password, and if the spacebar (or any repeating key) on the keyboard is stuck down or depressed (like by a chair arm) we will get thousands of these logon failures until the service Dr. Watsons. Have you spoken to JoeS? Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Out think, Out smart, Out medicate - Steinvivor -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 535 errors in security log NT SP6a ExchSP4 - audit turned on for log on failures and successes - mandated by security guidelines. Exchange is in a resource domain and user accounts are in the Account domain. Resource domain trusts account domain
Uninstalling EXCH2K
I'm trying to uninstall EXCH2K. When uninstalling it tells me that I cannot select the Remove feature because there is one or more users using a mailbox store on this server. They thing is that there isn't any mailboxes on that store that I created. Are there system mailboxes that were created during install? If so, how do I get rid of them to compelete the uninstall? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
Diane-- I read the rest of this thread before replying here... while everyone is offering valid input, I'd like to take a slightly different tack. In the message below, you say: The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server where we configured the script, and this view is where the requests are determined if they are accepted or not. So the meetings aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get booked for the same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client. Have you deleted and recreated the profile on the server? Sounds like that profile may be hosed. I'm having a hard time getting myself around the idea that the profile on the server has anything to do with the auto-accept script, though. The script should be profile independent, I would think. I mean... that was part of the purpose of developing it (I think): to make it so that someone wouldn't be sitting there with the mailbox open for the meetings to get scheduled. Since this isn't happening to other conference rooms, I'm guessing there is a problem with the mailbox itself... have you recreated the mailbox? One other thought crosses my mind: do you happen to leave outlook running on the server with that mailbox open? I've seen strange behavior from the script when the mailbox is open and someone tries to schedule a meeting (although usually the meeting request gets declined, not what you are seeing). Lori-- you have _got_ to have the worst luck with this script of anyone I know! I don't know if any of the above applies in your case or not. Tom M.-- re: footnote #4 in another post... I'll see what I can do. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions I know that, but I am not in charge of clients or training. This has been a pet peeve of mine for over a year, but no one will touch it until we can prove that the script isn't causing all the problems. And why would this affect only this one room and not the other 49? I know users who look at the calendar this way on the other rooms and this is the only room that we see mismatched meetings between the server and the client. I have also created a brand new profile for this room on my workstation and opened the room on my workstation and I see exactly what we see when we do file, open other user's. The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server where we configured the script, and this view is where the requests are determined if they are accepted or not. So the meetings aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get booked for the same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions FYI Don't let the users open the rooms using file - open - other users folder. This can corrupt the f/b time on the mailbox/room. Michael Semiglia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000
You should log in to the server using the domain admin account, but when Exchange or SQL asks for an account to run with, it should be a seperate, distinct account. That way, you're not logging into the server with the Exchange Service Account ID, which is bad. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Take time to deliberate; but when the time for action arrives, stop thinking and go in. One man with courage makes a majority. - Andrew Jackson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000 What would you recomend as the best way to install an NT/2000 service , wheather it being exchange 5.5 services such as Information Store or Sql service .. For example my mail servers are running on NT 4 as memeber servers of an NT domain, when installing Exchange should I use the local Admin account, or the domains admin account, what are the pros and cons of both ??? Is it a security reason why you would use one or the other?? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA was unable to get to your inbox
Can you explain that better? I'm not sure what's happening by your description. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Two aerials meet on a roof - fall in love - get married The ceremony was rubbish but the reception was brilliant. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Romero, Eric Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA was unable to get to your inbox MSX5.5 SP4 Hi all do you know of any reason why in a random way users get the error message in the subject when trying to acces their mailbox in OWA, they try some days later and all is fine and then somedays after same error.. Nothing reported in the event viewer. Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
Although you're remarkably lucid on the Fish Taco issue... Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Even in our world, sometimes we are aliens. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Fear not. I have four - though I was declared legally insane sometime ago... Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least one of these. They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC to win. Visit http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more information and to enter. There are 10 categories: - Best Solution by a Partner - Best Solution by a Customer - Best Developer Tool - Best Infrastructure Product - Best Management Tool or Utility - Best Use of Mobile Technologies - Best Productivity Solution - Best Use of Workflow - Best Vertical-focused Solution - Best Use of XML Please see the Web site for more information. Earnie Glazener Microsoft _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
*sigh* I know. It failed yesterday afternoon again, I got it working, it failed again last evening. Today I just reran the wizard on that one room because bouncing the service on an Evil Cluster has often caused the whole thing to fail over, then Scanmail can't get to the IS, fail over again to the original node, say a quick spell, it's all too much! -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Diane-- I read the rest of this thread before replying here... while everyone is offering valid input, I'd like to take a slightly different tack. In the message below, you say: The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server where we configured the script, and this view is where the requests are determined if they are accepted or not. So the meetings aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get booked for the same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client. Have you deleted and recreated the profile on the server? Sounds like that profile may be hosed. I'm having a hard time getting myself around the idea that the profile on the server has anything to do with the auto-accept script, though. The script should be profile independent, I would think. I mean... that was part of the purpose of developing it (I think): to make it so that someone wouldn't be sitting there with the mailbox open for the meetings to get scheduled. Since this isn't happening to other conference rooms, I'm guessing there is a problem with the mailbox itself... have you recreated the mailbox? One other thought crosses my mind: do you happen to leave outlook running on the server with that mailbox open? I've seen strange behavior from the script when the mailbox is open and someone tries to schedule a meeting (although usually the meeting request gets declined, not what you are seeing). Lori-- you have _got_ to have the worst luck with this script of anyone I know! I don't know if any of the above applies in your case or not. Tom M.-- re: footnote #4 in another post... I'll see what I can do. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions I know that, but I am not in charge of clients or training. This has been a pet peeve of mine for over a year, but no one will touch it until we can prove that the script isn't causing all the problems. And why would this affect only this one room and not the other 49? I know users who look at the calendar this way on the other rooms and this is the only room that we see mismatched meetings between the server and the client. I have also created a brand new profile for this room on my workstation and opened the room on my workstation and I see exactly what we see when we do file, open other user's. The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server where we configured the script, and this view is where the requests are determined if they are accepted or not. So the meetings aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get booked for the same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions FYI Don't let the users open the rooms using file - open - other users folder. This can corrupt the f/b time on the mailbox/room. Michael Semiglia _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Uninstalling EXCH2K
John try this link. It may wrap. I have used it and it works everytime. http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/3/78.ASP By the way you work for a cool company. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: August 24, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm trying to uninstall EXCH2K. When uninstalling it tells me that I cannot select the Remove feature because there is one or more users using a mailbox store on this server. They thing is that there isn't any mailboxes on that store that I created. Are there system mailboxes that were created during install? If so, how do I get rid of them to compelete the uninstall? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: 535 errors in security log
No, he does NOT have an exchange mailbox. He has Outlook installed with the profile being built using his NT LAN ID which normally is the Exchange mailbox alias for the end users here. However, since he does not have an exchange mailbox, he cannot open Outlook. He just gets the generic error, Unable to open you folders. Also, the NT ID was not locked, the w/s was locked and the password had expired. As far as the last statement, we do have rightfax and winfax in use here. Maybe on of those apps was trying to use the mapi profile on the w/s. Think I need to do a network trace and see exactly what is being sent over the wire. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log wait... so he DID have a mailbox, right? He just doesn't use it? I'd say that the problems occured because the NT ID was locked, and some other process was trying to access the mailbox, and because the ID was locked, that interfered. As far as I know, when Outlook is shut down, it's shut down, and not attempting to talk to the Exchange server in any way. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net One kind word can warm three winter months. Chinese proverb -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Semiglia, Michael Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 6:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log We did a little more t/s last night. Had a user who left their NT w/s locked for a week while out of town on a conference. During that week we think the password expired. No stuck keyboard of process or any kind of coding running. The user does NOT have an exchange mailbox. We have two email systems here, Notes being the other. However, he did have Outlook installed. We automatically build an outlook profile for users based on the NT login ID which matches the mailbox alias. While we were getting the errors, I was unable to check the outlook profile properties. The panel just kept hanging. We then set the password in the account domain to never expire. The 535 errors immediately went away. At that point I was able to get into the outlook profile properties and view all the configuration setups. The conclusion thus far is that Outlook was trying to match up the alias to the address box and kept failing because of the expired password and the fact that there is no mailbox for that user. Did not realize that even though Outlook is not running, it still has a portion of itself that is actively talking to the exchange servers. I am not sure if this falls under the category of bug or feature. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Perzactly - a process rather than a person is doing it. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Also, make sure that nobody is writing code that connects to your Exchange Server for sending emails. Their process may be trying to login with wrong credentials. S. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Could NAV be trying to open mailboxes with invalid credentials? I don't use it, not sure how it works. Lori Hunter LAN Administrator Citi Commerce Solutions (847) 597-3118 Sic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nuc -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log Nope, vanilla exch 5.5 server. Not even any connectors. We do have NAVMSE running. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 535 errors in security log Anything else running on that exchange server? Fax? Virus scanner? -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: 535 errors in security log Have not spoken to Joes. We get this error for multiple people. Some on laptops, some working home, some at the office. There is no common thread that I have been able to discover. We use NT 4 w/s and use the built in screensaver. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori
RE: secondary domain inbound failing
Please see the last paragraph of my original message - you can't set a tail for outbound mail without entering the tail as an SMTP address. So that has been done. What else ? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Have you added a secondary SMTP address for that domain, for that user? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: secondary domain inbound failing I have an Echange 5.5 server with the following entries in the IMS routing tab: Sent to Route to mydomain1.com inbound mydomain2.com inbound The server has been rebooted since that entry was made. I get mail on the first domain, but I get this when I send mail to the second domain from the outside: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:48:57 -0400 (EDT) from mailgate@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.mydomain1.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 not local host mydomain2.com, not a gateway 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown The mailbox insideuser exists, and his outbound tail is set to mydomain2.com. It looks like there is an attempt to deliver to the Exchange server, but the server refuses to recognize the user. The same user receives mail regularly at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is wrong here ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: secondary domain inbound failing
Oh great, we've found another knowledge gap in my brain. Like I needed more. What on earth is a tail for outbound mail, and how would I enter it as an SMTP address? In general, I mean. I don't use Exchange 5.5 anymore, so maybe they've replaced it in Exchange 2000 with another animal body part; say, an udder or a beak. -Original Message- From: NetAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:02 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: secondary domain inbound failing Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Please see the last paragraph of my original message - you can't set a tail for outbound mail without entering the tail as an SMTP address. So that has been done. What else ? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Have you added a secondary SMTP address for that domain, for that user? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: secondary domain inbound failing I have an Echange 5.5 server with the following entries in the IMS routing tab: Sent to Route to mydomain1.com inbound mydomain2.com inbound The server has been rebooted since that entry was made. I get mail on the first domain, but I get this when I send mail to the second domain from the outside: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:48:57 -0400 (EDT) from mailgate@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.mydomain1.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 not local host mydomain2.com, not a gateway 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown The mailbox insideuser exists, and his outbound tail is set to mydomain2.com. It looks like there is an attempt to deliver to the Exchange server, but the server refuses to recognize the user. The same user receives mail regularly at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is wrong here ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
Siegfried, this has been great help. I will get our off hours monitoring team to re-register cdo and reboot the server. We are in mixed mode on the client side right now, about half of the 4500 users are running 2000 and half 98. We have not updated the client that resides on the server. What ever version was available in Dec 98 is what is still there. AS far as SR/SP versions, clients who are running 98 generally have version 8.5.6614.0 unless they need it reinstalled and then they get 98 with the service pack. Clients running 2000 are generally running 9.0.0.3821 and that, I am told, is SR1. Thanks for all your help on this. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.262.260.5330 -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Inline... -Original Message- I don't remember. I didn't build the box. That was back in Dec 98. We have installed SPs after Outlook 98, which service pack are you referring to? Doesn't matter. The important part is to have any Exchange 5.5 SP installed if you installed Outlook after Exchange to get a lot of stuff straightened out. Outlook 98 was installed when we built the server and wasn't been recently installed. Okay. That's a good sign. I have found the following cdo.dll files: C:\winnt\system32 version 5.5.2654.54 That's the active one. e:\exchsrvr\q289606 version 5.5.2653.12, this is the drive with the IS That's a backup after you applied Q289606. What you could do now is stop all Exchange services (and make sure to include all related - like AntiVirus, System Management etc) and re-register CDO.DLL with regsvr32.exe CDL.DLL (from within c:\winnt\system32) and reboot afterwards. Also, what version of Outlook do you run on the client? 2000? If so, what SR/SP? Maybe the Security Update installed? It comes with a newer version of CDO 1.21 than vanilla OL2k and might have an issue. Siegfried / _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Fish Tacos
Reminds me of my school days - I asked my Chemistry teacher what the value of a particular constant was, and was told it varies! -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 August 2001 14:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Tacos Are you serious? -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Fish Tacos What is a standard? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of SchlumbergerSema. If you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the SchlumbergerSema Helpdesk by telephone on +44 (0) 121 627 5600. ___ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: secondary domain inbound failing
Damn gremlins are stealing entire words from my messages and adding in unneeded punctuation over the place's. -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Oh, here in Texas a domain. Still, the configuration of the Exchange server is completely irrelevant at this point as it's could be encased in a block of concrete at the bottom of Lake Michigan and the error message would be the same. * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: NetAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing A tail is the part of the address after the @ symbol. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Oh great, we've found another knowledge gap in my brain. Like I needed more. What on earth is a tail for outbound mail, and how would I enter it as an SMTP address? In general, I mean. I don't use Exchange 5.5 anymore, so maybe they've replaced it in Exchange 2000 with another animal body part; say, an udder or a beak. -Original Message- From: NetAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:02 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: secondary domain inbound failing Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Please see the last paragraph of my original message - you can't set a tail for outbound mail without entering the tail as an SMTP address. So that has been done. What else ? -Original Message- From: Bob Sadler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 8:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: secondary domain inbound failing Have you added a secondary SMTP address for that domain, for that user? Bob Sadler City of Leawood, KS, USA -Original Message- From: Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 7:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: secondary domain inbound failing I have an Echange 5.5 server with the following entries in the IMS routing tab: Sent to Route to mydomain1.com inbound mydomain2.com inbound The server has been rebooted since that entry was made. I get mail on the first domain, but I get this when I send mail to the second domain from the outside: From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Returned mail: User unknown The original message was received at Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:48:57 -0400 (EDT) from mailgate@localhost - The following addresses had permanent fatal errors - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Transcript of session follows - ... while talking to mail.mydomain1.com.: RCPT To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 550 not local host mydomain2.com, not a gateway 550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] User unknown The mailbox insideuser exists, and his outbound tail is set to mydomain2.com. It looks like there is an attempt to deliver to the Exchange server, but the server refuses to recognize the user. The same user receives mail regularly at the [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is wrong here ? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Clean out Public Folders
Is there a way to set up a public folder to purge its content after a certain amount of days? This can be done through autoarchive on my regular mailbox but I can't seem to find a way to do it via a public folder. Thanks -Chad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clean out Public Folders
In XADM, hit the F1 key. hint: Age Limit for Replicas -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- C.A. Beard - -Original Message- From: Chad Gibson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clean out Public Folders Is there a way to set up a public folder to purge its content after a certain amount of days? This can be done through autoarchive on my regular mailbox but I can't seem to find a way to do it via a public folder. Thanks -Chad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
disabled mailboxes
Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled mailboxes
What version of server? Were the e-mail addresses removed? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled mailboxes Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled mailboxes
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/Personal/Files/?File=~MoreInfo.TXT -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Murphy's Technology Law #13: New systems generate new problems. - -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled mailboxes Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled mailboxes
Exchange 2k, sp1 - I didn't remove any e-mail addresses, I simply disabled the account through active directory and now all mail to the account bounces. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes What version of server? Were the e-mail addresses removed? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled mailboxes Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled mailboxes
um... thats because Exchange2K uses the Active Directory for its DS, rather than its own (like Exchange 5.5 does). Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net There must be a hundred silver dollars in here, moaned Boggis, waving a purse. I mean, that's not my league. That's not my class. I can't handle that sort of money. You've got to be in the Guild of Lawyers or something to steal that much. -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wells, Brent Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes Exchange 2k, sp1 - I didn't remove any e-mail addresses, I simply disabled the account through active directory and now all mail to the account bounces. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes What version of server? Were the e-mail addresses removed? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled mailboxes Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing contact files
No, I have not resolved the problem yet. Other more pressing problems responsibilities have forced me to table this one for the moment, but I'll be getting back to it! ve -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 5:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files I think you'll find that most of the people here are actually very nice and helpful. Stick around for awhile, and answer some Hanji questions and all of this will make sense. Its really nothing personal. You never did tell us whether the issue has been resolved or not..- or perhaps I missed it. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files After my experience, I would agree that that is true for some of the participants. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files I remember back in my earlier days asking if there was an Exch group. People would say well there the Swynk one, but those people are mean and will tear you up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files You are so full of crap!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files People here tend to be hostile when they perceive a poster to be both clueless and argumentative. The original owner of this list used to call it arrogant ignorance. Go back and read your own posts with an open mind and maybe you'll understand what I'm telling you. Then answer the questions that are posed to you precisely. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Why are you all so HOSTILE? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files That is not a file!!! A file is a word doc, an excel spreadsheet, a PowerPoint presentation, a text document, etc... A contacts folder is that... A FOLDER, entries in that folder are called ITEMS. Get your facts straight! - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing contact files
No,still not working correctly. I even tried creating a new one and it still wouldn't let other users edit entries. ve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Vicki? Does it work now?? Update us, please! -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Nice doggie. - Famous Last Words - -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files After my experience, I would agree that that is true for some of the participants. ve -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files I remember back in my earlier days asking if there was an Exch group. People would say well there the Swynk one, but those people are mean and will tear you up -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files You are so full of crap!! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files People here tend to be hostile when they perceive a poster to be both clueless and argumentative. The original owner of this list used to call it arrogant ignorance. Go back and read your own posts with an open mind and maybe you'll understand what I'm telling you. Then answer the questions that are posed to you precisely. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ewart, Vicki L. Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Why are you all so HOSTILE? -Original Message- From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files That is not a file!!! A file is a word doc, an excel spreadsheet, a PowerPoint presentation, a text document, etc... A contacts folder is that... A FOLDER, entries in that folder are called ITEMS. Get your facts straight! - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing contact files
Sorry, I haven't been following along too closely. This is E2K correct? How many AD domains? Native W2K or are there still NT 4 domains? Native E2K or are there still Exchange 5.5 servers hanging about? If you assign an individual user rights instead of the default group... Can they edit as expected? insert PFs are broken in E2K mantra here * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files No,still not working correctly. I even tried creating a new one and it still wouldn't let other users edit entries. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing contact files
-Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Sorry, I haven't been following along too closely. This is E2K correct? Correct How many AD domains? Just one. Native W2K or are there still NT 4 domains? Only one W2k domain Native E2K or are there still Exchange 5.5 servers hanging about? Only E2k If you assign an individual user rights instead of the default group... Can they edit as expected? Nope. Made them all owners and they still can't edit. insert PFs are broken in E2K mantra here * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files No,still not working correctly. I even tried creating a new one and it still wouldn't let other users edit entries. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Sharing contact files
Vicki: Wasnt there something early on about a mirror site? Or has my glue-sniffing finally caught up to me? Also, What happens when you the users try to edit? Error message or they just can't do it? Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files -Original Message- From: Scharff, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files Sorry, I haven't been following along too closely. This is E2K correct? Correct How many AD domains? Just one. Native W2K or are there still NT 4 domains? Only one W2k domain Native E2K or are there still Exchange 5.5 servers hanging about? Only E2k If you assign an individual user rights instead of the default group... Can they edit as expected? Nope. Made them all owners and they still can't edit. insert PFs are broken in E2K mantra here * Chris Scharff[EMAIL PROTECTED]www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX +1-512-322-0071 * -Original Message- From: Ewart, Vicki L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Sharing contact files No,still not working correctly. I even tried creating a new one and it still wouldn't let other users edit entries. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
Diane, Another thing you could check is if the profile where you see this information is configured for offline sync (using an OST file). There might be an issue that the sync is screwed. Note that offline sync is enabled automatically with Outlook 2000 IIRC. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Siegfried, this has been great help. I will get our off hours monitoring team to re-register cdo and reboot the server. We are in mixed mode on the client side right now, about half of the 4500 users are running 2000 and half 98. We have not updated the client that resides on the server. What ever version was available in Dec 98 is what is still there. AS far as SR/SP versions, clients who are running 98 generally have version 8.5.6614.0 unless they need it reinstalled and then they get 98 with the service pack. Clients running 2000 are generally running 9.0.0.3821 and that, I am told, is SR1. Thanks for all your help on this. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.262.260.5330 -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Inline... -Original Message- I don't remember. I didn't build the box. That was back in Dec 98. We have installed SPs after Outlook 98, which service pack are you referring to? Doesn't matter. The important part is to have any Exchange 5.5 SP installed if you installed Outlook after Exchange to get a lot of stuff straightened out. Outlook 98 was installed when we built the server and wasn't been recently installed. Okay. That's a good sign. I have found the following cdo.dll files: C:\winnt\system32 version 5.5.2654.54 That's the active one. e:\exchsrvr\q289606 version 5.5.2653.12, this is the drive with the IS That's a backup after you applied Q289606. What you could do now is stop all Exchange services (and make sure to include all related - like AntiVirus, System Management etc) and re-register CDO.DLL with regsvr32.exe CDL.DLL (from within c:\winnt\system32) and reboot afterwards. Also, what version of Outlook do you run on the client? 2000? If so, what SR/SP? Maybe the Security Update installed? It comes with a newer version of CDO 1.21 than vanilla OL2k and might have an issue. Siegfried / _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install/Upgrade of Exch 5.5-2k on 2k DC
Hi All, My goal is to install Exch2k on a Win2k DC (test purposes, can't spare multiple machines). Anyway, I'm following Q275127, which gives the path of installing an NT4 PDC, then Exch 5.5, then upgrading to Win2k, and finally upgrading Exch55 to 2k. One of the steps after the Win2k upgrade is: 7. To ensure that Exchange Server 5.5 is coexisting with Windows 2000 Active Directory, verify that the Active Directory Connector (ADC) has been installed, and that a connection agreement has been created. The next step is to upgrade to Exch 2k. I changed the LDAP ports and added a reg key to disable the MAPI port for Active Directory, but now I don't know how to test the above checkpoint. I created a new user in Win2k, but Ex55 didn't seem to recognize anything.. is this proof that it is not working? What else can I look at. Thanks. -Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled mailboxes
re-enable the user, and change the password so they don't know it? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net If we can send a man to the moon, why can't we send a man to the moon? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wells, Brent Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes Is their any way to make it stop? Resource mailboxes with disabled user accounts don't have this problem... -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes um... thats because Exchange2K uses the Active Directory for its DS, rather than its own (like Exchange 5.5 does). Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net There must be a hundred silver dollars in here, moaned Boggis, waving a purse. I mean, that's not my league. That's not my class. I can't handle that sort of money. You've got to be in the Guild of Lawyers or something to steal that much. -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wells, Brent Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes Exchange 2k, sp1 - I didn't remove any e-mail addresses, I simply disabled the account through active directory and now all mail to the account bounces. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes What version of server? Were the e-mail addresses removed? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled mailboxes Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems...
I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: disabled mailboxes
Yes. I am running to the same problem. And that is exactly what I did as a work around. Use some sort of password generators to generate a random password. Andrew, MCSE (NT W2K) + CCNA -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes re-enable the user, and change the password so they don't know it? Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net If we can send a man to the moon, why can't we send a man to the moon? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wells, Brent Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes Is their any way to make it stop? Resource mailboxes with disabled user accounts don't have this problem... -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes um... thats because Exchange2K uses the Active Directory for its DS, rather than its own (like Exchange 5.5 does). Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net There must be a hundred silver dollars in here, moaned Boggis, waving a purse. I mean, that's not my league. That's not my class. I can't handle that sort of money. You've got to be in the Guild of Lawyers or something to steal that much. -- (Terry Pratchett, Wyrd Sisters) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wells, Brent Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes Exchange 2k, sp1 - I didn't remove any e-mail addresses, I simply disabled the account through active directory and now all mail to the account bounces. -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: disabled mailboxes What version of server? Were the e-mail addresses removed? -Original Message- From: Wells, Brent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: disabled mailboxes Does anyone have any idea why when you disable a user account, the mailbox is disabled as well? All mail sent to these accounts bounce with an NDR. Any ideas? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the IMS
Using this method of TELNETing into my Exchange Server I have discovered that I am in fact a relay-er I was able to send mail from a non-local [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the other bogus recieved the mail with no error or complaint from the exchange server. OKAY...How do I stop it. I have tried restricting routing but that seems to either cut off incoming or out going mail. We are a single exchange server (5.5 sp4) shop. Additionally, If I restrict to only authenticated OWA stops functioning. Any Ideas, or is there a step by step guide to this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Aha!! Now I see. Many thanks for this. Have a great weekend. Dom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2001 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Yes, this is normal. Take a look at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt from: 6.1 Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the address from the envelope return path (or the Return-Path: line). However, if this address is null (), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT send a notification. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Scarlet Pimpernel Letter - An 18th-century English nobleman leads a double life, freeing comely young adulteresses from the prisons of post-Revolution France. - -Original Message- From: McNeill Alasdair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS They are probably NDRs! -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Thanks for this. I get a message telling me that Relaying is prohibited which seems fine. However, if I look at the queue's in the IMS there are messages with nothing in the sender field. Is this normal? If it's not stuff being relayed then what could it be?? I'm confused! :) (well it is friday) -Original Message- From: McNeill Alasdair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2001 11:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS You can telnet your self into your Exchange through port 25 then follow the artical! http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q153/1/19.asp If you can send a mail with an account that is not in your Ex Org then you have an open relay if you get an error then you do not relay mail! A McNeill -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the IMS Hi all I have a strange problem with the IMS on our Exchange 5.5 server. (SP4 running on WIN2k) The IMS appears to be set so as to prevent relaying but it looks like spam is still getting relayed. Is there a simple way to prove this suspicion one way or the other please? Many thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
Hi Clint, Given your situation and the complexity of your environment, I'd honestly go ahead and give MS PSS a call (FAQ). They'll be able to provide you the best support and it's well worth $200 or so. good luck. Byron -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems...
Sorry, most of us here are guys...It is well known that we have a short attention span (sorry, cant/wont speak for the ladies) therefore we have a tendency to stop reading after a paragraph. Since there was no question in the first one, we probably all got sidetracked by a donut or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
calendar slow to update
My apologies if this has already appeared. I originally posted this one, maybe two, days ago and although I did get a couple of 'out of office' replies, I don't recall seeing it posted. I've search Technet, archives and even posted to MS Usenet groups but haven't found an answer yet to the following situation: Server: dual P200, 256 meg RAM, NT 4.0 sp6, Exchange 5.5 sp4 In reference to: recurring appts in a calendar set up as a Public Folder Our Surgery dept. uses Outlook (v2000) calendar to show who's on call. Four entries, each set up as recurring all-day events with no end date. The problem: When you open just one entry (or even the series) and change it, when you click on Save/Close, it takes upwards of 23 seconds before the appt is closed. I've tried this on various pc's and tried different appt. entries but the time is almost always the same. The size of the calendar is approximately 3.5 meg. However, I did notice that if I create a new entry, with the same parameters as the others, I can modify it and the Save/Close happens rather quickly. Could a corrupted entry be causing such a slow update? Or, is it simply a matter of too much data to work with given the speed of the computer?Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
I would guess that you are having some severe DNS resolution problems. -Tony -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Sorry, most of us here are guys...It is well known that we have a short attention span (sorry, cant/wont speak for the ladies) therefore we have a tendency to stop reading after a paragraph. Since there was no question in the first one, we probably all got sidetracked by a donut or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
M. Donuts. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Sorry, most of us here are guys...It is well known that we have a short attention span (sorry, cant/wont speak for the ladies) therefore we have a tendency to stop reading after a paragraph. Since there was no question in the first one, we probably all got sidetracked by a donut or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Securing the IMS
http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 also available here: http://downloads.members.tripod.com/ladysun1969/misc/relay.tif -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The correct word for non-Americans is not pinko. It's majority. - Paul Sleigh - -Original Message- From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Using this method of TELNETing into my Exchange Server I have discovered that I am in fact a relay-er I was able to send mail from a non-local [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the other bogus recieved the mail with no error or complaint from the exchange server. OKAY...How do I stop it. I have tried restricting routing but that seems to either cut off incoming or out going mail. We are a single exchange server (5.5 sp4) shop. Additionally, If I restrict to only authenticated OWA stops functioning. Any Ideas, or is there a step by step guide to this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Aha!! Now I see. Many thanks for this. Have a great weekend. Dom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2001 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Yes, this is normal. Take a look at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt from: 6.1 Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the address from the envelope return path (or the Return-Path: line). However, if this address is null (), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT send a notification. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Scarlet Pimpernel Letter - An 18th-century English nobleman leads a double life, freeing comely young adulteresses from the prisons of post-Revolution France. - -Original Message- From: McNeill Alasdair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS They are probably NDRs! -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Thanks for this. I get a message telling me that Relaying is prohibited which seems fine. However, if I look at the queue's in the IMS there are messages with nothing in the sender field. Is this normal? If it's not stuff being relayed then what could it be?? I'm confused! :) (well it is friday) -Original Message- From: McNeill Alasdair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2001 11:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS You can telnet your self into your Exchange through port 25 then follow the artical! http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q153/1/19.asp If you can send a mail with an account that is not in your Ex Org then you have an open relay if you get an error then you do not relay mail! A McNeill -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the IMS Hi all I have a strange problem with the IMS on our Exchange 5.5 server. (SP4 running on WIN2k) The IMS appears to be set so as to prevent relaying but it looks like spam is still getting relayed. Is there a simple way to prove this suspicion one way or the other please? Many thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems...
OK, let's just slow down here. How MANY donuts do you have every Friday? Were they baked fresh today? Give me every detail. (on a diet) g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/24/2001 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Just had a glazed sour cream donut.m Donut Friday every Friday. -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... M. Donuts. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Sorry, most of us here are guys...It is well known that we have a short attention span (sorry, cant/wont speak for the ladies) therefore we have a tendency to stop reading after a paragraph. Since there was no question in the first one, we probably all got sidetracked by a donut or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... I sent this out yesterday morning. Anyone have any ideas on it? I haven't seen any responses yet... Thanks again. clint -Original Message- From: Clint CHN. Nichols Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 8:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Exchange Discussion List: Hi all. I've been off the list for over a year now (like anyone remembers me ;-)) and I've recently converted the Netware network I've been managing to all Windows 2000/Active Directory... I used the Services for Netware migration to assist in the process. The domain conversion and install went very smoothly but the Exchange 2000 server we installed has been throwing fits from day 1. After spending a whole week of battling it I finally realized the stupidity of my stubbornness and decided it was time to see the experts... I'm sure someone here has run into this... Here's my configuration. Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 (NON-advanced) server with SP2. Compaq ML530 with latest network driver On a TCP/IP network with 5 other 2000 servers. (3 terminal server, 1 Websense, 1 PDC) The PDC has the GC, DHCP and DNS services active and working. The websense is a BDC No NT4.0 at all. VPN to remote network with 3 2000 servers there. All DC's one is a GC Approximately 2000 accounts. The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. At the server it gets deeper. No names show up in any of the address list (global or otherwise) under recipients. If you do a properties/preview on the global address list it will show users. But they aren't there otherwise. The server randomly goes through periods of slamming the event log with errors (during which time its goes down and needs to be restarted) I assume this coincides with the RUS but haven't been able to confirm. I have selected for force the RUS and haven' been able to make the errors occur. These errors resemble this. Event ID 2075 Source MSExchangeDSAccess Process INETINFO.EXE (PID=1080), DsBind failed. Athensasd.k12.pa.us. hr=0x8007054b, deltaT=47 the operation will be retried. It also dumps a similar error for STORE.EXE and EMSMTA.EXE. there is also a MAD.EXE with an event of 2064 and message of all the remote DS servers in user are not responding We had original install errors with RPC errors and the like. I fixed these with the new ML530 NIC driver and changes to the DC's and other servers on the network. The server has been wiped and reloaded from scratch at least twice and we've checked and rechecked our work. Poured over support and technet for hours on end. Does anyone have any ideas of where to go from here? Seen this before? Thanks Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
Tim Hortons? -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... OK, let's just slow down here. How MANY donuts do you have every Friday? Were they baked fresh today? Give me every detail. (on a diet) g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/24/2001 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Just had a glazed sour cream donut.m Donut Friday every Friday. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Groupwise connector on Windows 2000 Server
I am working on an exchange5.5 Groupwise Migration, Groupwise 5.5 to Exchange 5.5 SP4, I have an existing NT4 domain, and a few Win2k Member servers in that domain, all with SP2, I have on 1 of the win2k memberservers Exchange 5.5 sp4 and have installed the Groupwise Connector, and have problems getting the Groupwise Router service to start which is the interface to the Groupwise API gateway that is loaded on the Groupwise 5.5 server, has any one done this setup. I would like to here others opinions on the Microsoft exchange Groupwise connector and any issues successes, the docs I have/use for this setup are from Exchange5.5 Service pack 3 cd Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
I see, so your company doesn't care enough about it's employees to feed them decent food? And just to throw some exchange into this... I'd put your resume in a secure public folder, providing a password only to potential employers ;) William -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... Yep. How many donuts? Well, I have one. The company orders several dozen. Enough to give 200 people a donut each :) lotsa variety. And every first Friday of the month is BBQ Friday, during the summer. Free hamburgers, hotdogs, pop, chips, etc. During the winter, it's free KFC instead of BBQ. Hehe. I dunno about the KFC thing. I just load up on the salads...the chicken seems to slow me down some. And just to throw some exchange into this...Exchange is an excellent resource to share recipes and schedule company events such as picnics, movie nights, etc. David. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... Tim Hortons? -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... OK, let's just slow down here. How MANY donuts do you have every Friday? Were they baked fresh today? Give me every detail. (on a diet) g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/24/2001 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Just had a glazed sour cream donut.m Donut Friday every Friday. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
One thing I left out, If you have administrative assistants booking for someone, make sure ALL involved are not using the calendar cache/OST thing. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
We know they're trying to kill us...we just haven't figured out why yet. Good suggestion about the resumethat way my boss won't see my name pop up on Monster -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... I see, so your company doesn't care enough about it's employees to feed them decent food? And just to throw some exchange into this... I'd put your resume in a secure public folder, providing a password only to potential employers ;) William -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... Yep. How many donuts? Well, I have one. The company orders several dozen. Enough to give 200 people a donut each :) lotsa variety. And every first Friday of the month is BBQ Friday, during the summer. Free hamburgers, hotdogs, pop, chips, etc. During the winter, it's free KFC instead of BBQ. Hehe. I dunno about the KFC thing. I just load up on the salads...the chicken seems to slow me down some. And just to throw some exchange into this...Exchange is an excellent resource to share recipes and schedule company events such as picnics, movie nights, etc. David. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... Tim Hortons? -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... OK, let's just slow down here. How MANY donuts do you have every Friday? Were they baked fresh today? Give me every detail. (on a diet) g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/24/2001 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Just had a glazed sour cream donut.m Donut Friday every Friday. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: GroupWise Migration Question
What tools did you use to migrate from Exchange 5.5 to Groupwise , I am working on a similiar project, Groupwise 5.5 to exchange 5.5 on Win2k Member server in an NT4 domain, I have been using the Exchange Groupwise connector which comes on Exchange 5.5 sp3, my idea is to get the 2 directories syncd and talking and then migrate them with the Migration Wizard, how are you doing this ?? Are you using a 3rd party utility?? to check your users on groupwise mail box size use the Groupwise Off Check tools it will report all the information about your users -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bevilacqua.Steve Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: GroupWise Migration Question We've been migrating quite successfully from GropuWise 5.2 to Exchange for about 2 months so far. We've got about 7000 more to go and have hit one issue that is slowing us down a bit. We are trying to find a way to determine the size of the GroupWise users' mailboxes prior to the migration so we can determine how long it will take to migrate the data. Anyone ever heard of a tool that can do this? Thanks Steve * The information transmitted is intended solely for the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Viewing and editing routing maps in Exchange 5.5
Hi, how do I view and edit a routing map in Exchange 5.5? I'm planning to edit the routing maps that are created by the Routing Wizard. Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Attaching Files as Shortcuts
Hello, We are running exchange5.5 with Outlook2000 clients. We would like to have the INSERT ATTACHMENT function default to inserting the file as a shortcut to the file rather than the default attachment as file. Is this possible with a registry entry or a profile of some type? We would like to cut back on the number of various file versions that float around in emails and have just shortcuts to the file on a fileserver. We would also like the option to attach the actual file, but we want it to not be the default. Any references would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA: MAPI_E_NOT_FOUND
I am trying to set the MAPI property for fields that are not defined in
the H00150040 format as provided by MS in the following link:
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q183/0/94.asp
Example:
objMsg.Fields.Add H00150040, 234
The field is defined with {04200600C046}0x8026
Does anyone know how to do it?
Peichung Chiu
Technologist
___
K O K O I N T E R A C T I V E
Creativity | Strategy | Technology
212.924.5388 | http://www.kokointeractive.com
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K with GFI Faxmaker 2000
my problem: I run an exchange 5.5 server on a NT 4.0 machine with GFI Faxmaker 5.5 installed. I added an E2K-Server to this site. I plan to install GFI - Faxmaker 2000 on this E2K Server. This requires deinstallation of GFI Faxmaker 5.5 (only 1 Faxserver in a site allowed). Because of organizational aspects, i am not able to move all the mailboxes to the E2K-server. I am looking now for a configuration, that allows exchange 5.5 mailboxes and E2K-mailboxes to use Faxmaker2000. Anyone out there who has made his experience with that? urgent help is needed Alex. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
Cannot stand donuts. Rather have cookies instead. Chocolate chunk preferred. -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: calendar slow to update
The whole recurring thing doesn't work well, IMO. Corrupt easily, cause nothing but headaches. I would speculate that making a new entry is different than updating. Why I could not say. However, given that recurring appts are known to be flaky I would look to changing your process. The no end date gives me pause. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar slow to update My apologies if this has already appeared. I originally posted this one, maybe two, days ago and although I did get a couple of 'out of office' replies, I don't recall seeing it posted. I've search Technet, archives and even posted to MS Usenet groups but haven't found an answer yet to the following situation: Server: dual P200, 256 meg RAM, NT 4.0 sp6, Exchange 5.5 sp4 In reference to: recurring appts in a calendar set up as a Public Folder Our Surgery dept. uses Outlook (v2000) calendar to show who's on call. Four entries, each set up as recurring all-day events with no end date. The problem: When you open just one entry (or even the series) and change it, when you click on Save/Close, it takes upwards of 23 seconds before the appt is closed. I've tried this on various pc's and tried different appt. entries but the time is almost always the same. The size of the calendar is approximately 3.5 meg. However, I did notice that if I create a new entry, with the same parameters as the others, I can modify it and the Save/Close happens rather quickly. Could a corrupted entry be causing such a slow update? Or, is it simply a matter of too much data to work with given the speed of the computer?Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
There are seldom technological solutions to behavioral problems. I can't believe no one else said it. Ed must be sleeping. :) -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attaching Files as Shortcuts Hello, We are running exchange5.5 with Outlook2000 clients. We would like to have the INSERT ATTACHMENT function default to inserting the file as a shortcut to the file rather than the default attachment as file. Is this possible with a registry entry or a profile of some type? We would like to cut back on the number of various file versions that float around in emails and have just shortcuts to the file on a fileserver. We would also like the option to attach the actual file, but we want it to not be the default. Any references would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
Or maybe... http://www.terravirtua.com/hummer/index.html -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts There are seldom technological solutions to behavioral problems. I can't believe no one else said it. Ed must be sleeping. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FW: Uninstalling EXCH2K
I'm in the midst of uninstalling EXCH2K. I've completely removed it. But when I try to Install a fresh copy, it gives me the same setup as before. How can I get a completly fresh install? Is there some kind of switch I need use when I run setup? Please advise. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange List (E-mail) Subject: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm trying to uninstall EXCH2K. When uninstalling it tells me that I cannot select the Remove feature because there is one or more users using a mailbox store on this server. They thing is that there isn't any mailboxes on that store that I created. Are there system mailboxes that were created during install? If so, how do I get rid of them to compelete the uninstall? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000
Yes. Define a unique account as your service account and use that for installing Exchange. Set the account password to something that's not obvious and configure it so that the password doesn't expire. Lock up the password to that account somewhere and don't ever use it for anything other than Exchange Services. Use separate accounts for backup or antivirus sw. Minimize the number of people that know the service account and make sure that the people who know what the password is do not use it for their daily tasks like mapping drives etc. Also make sure that the people who know the password have the same amount of power on the network with their own ids as does the service account (otherwise they'll use the service account to get around the network). Establish a plan and schedule for changing the password of the service account. Document all of the decisions you've made in a policy document and have it signed off by management. Follow and enforce your policy. S. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000 You should log in to the server using the domain admin account, but when Exchange or SQL asks for an account to run with, it should be a seperate, distinct account. That way, you're not logging into the server with the Exchange Service Account ID, which is bad. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Take time to deliberate; but when the time for action arrives, stop thinking and go in. One man with courage makes a majority. - Andrew Jackson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000 What would you recomend as the best way to install an NT/2000 service , wheather it being exchange 5.5 services such as Information Store or Sql service .. For example my mail servers are running on NT 4 as memeber servers of an NT domain, when installing Exchange should I use the local Admin account, or the domains admin account, what are the pros and cons of both ??? Is it a security reason why you would use one or the other?? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Uninstalling EXCH2K
Did you follow these: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/3/78.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q252/1/17.ASP William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm in the midst of uninstalling EXCH2K. I've completely removed it. But when I try to Install a fresh copy, it gives me the same setup as before. How can I get a completly fresh install? Is there some kind of switch I need use when I run setup? Please advise. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange List (E-mail) Subject: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm trying to uninstall EXCH2K. When uninstalling it tells me that I cannot select the Remove feature because there is one or more users using a mailbox store on this server. They thing is that there isn't any mailboxes on that store that I created. Are there system mailboxes that were created during install? If so, how do I get rid of them to compelete the uninstall? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000
Look both ways before crossing the street. Always floss behind your back teeth. Smile when you say that. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000 Yes. Define a unique account as your service account and use that for installing Exchange. Set the account password to something that's not obvious and configure it so that the password doesn't expire. Lock up the password to that account somewhere and don't ever use it for anything other than Exchange Services. Use separate accounts for backup or antivirus sw. Minimize the number of people that know the service account and make sure that the people who know what the password is do not use it for their daily tasks like mapping drives etc. Also make sure that the people who know the password have the same amount of power on the network with their own ids as does the service account (otherwise they'll use the service account to get around the network). Establish a plan and schedule for changing the password of the service account. Document all of the decisions you've made in a policy document and have it signed off by management. Follow and enforce your policy. S. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000 You should log in to the server using the domain admin account, but when Exchange or SQL asks for an account to run with, it should be a seperate, distinct account. That way, you're not logging into the server with the Exchange Service Account ID, which is bad. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Take time to deliberate; but when the time for action arrives, stop thinking and go in. One man with courage makes a majority. - Andrew Jackson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best Practices when installing Exchange 5.5 or 2000 What would you recomend as the best way to install an NT/2000 service , wheather it being exchange 5.5 services such as Information Store or Sql service .. For example my mail servers are running on NT 4 as memeber servers of an NT domain, when installing Exchange should I use the local Admin account, or the domains admin account, what are the pros and cons of both ??? Is it a security reason why you would use one or the other?? thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
no i think that's the Homer Simpson while eating sound :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Uninstalling EXCH2K
I'm just a caveman. I fell on some ice and later got thawed out by some of your scientists. My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts! Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Uninstalling EXCH2K Did you follow these: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q260/3/78.ASP http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q252/1/17.ASP William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm in the midst of uninstalling EXCH2K. I've completely removed it. But when I try to Install a fresh copy, it gives me the same setup as before. How can I get a completly fresh install? Is there some kind of switch I need use when I run setup? Please advise. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange List (E-mail) Subject: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm trying to uninstall EXCH2K. When uninstalling it tells me that I cannot select the Remove feature because there is one or more users using a mailbox store on this server. They thing is that there isn't any mailboxes on that store that I created. Are there system mailboxes that were created during install? If so, how do I get rid of them to compelete the uninstall? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing the IMS
Thank you. I now recieve the proper relaying prohibited reply from the exchange server. The article from exchange admin was exactly what I was looking for Thanks again -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS http://www.exchangeadmin.com/Articles/Index.cfm?ArticleID=7696 also available here: http://downloads.members.tripod.com/ladysun1969/misc/relay.tif -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The correct word for non-Americans is not pinko. It's majority. - Paul Sleigh - -Original Message- From: David Stafford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Using this method of TELNETing into my Exchange Server I have discovered that I am in fact a relay-er I was able to send mail from a non-local [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and the other bogus recieved the mail with no error or complaint from the exchange server. OKAY...How do I stop it. I have tried restricting routing but that seems to either cut off incoming or out going mail. We are a single exchange server (5.5 sp4) shop. Additionally, If I restrict to only authenticated OWA stops functioning. Any Ideas, or is there a step by step guide to this? Thanks -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Aha!! Now I see. Many thanks for this. Have a great weekend. Dom. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2001 13:00 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Yes, this is normal. Take a look at http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2821.txt from: 6.1 Reliable Delivery and Replies by Email If there is a delivery failure after acceptance of a message, the receiver-SMTP MUST formulate and mail a notification message. This notification MUST be sent using a null () reverse path in the envelope. The recipient of this notification MUST be the address from the envelope return path (or the Return-Path: line). However, if this address is null (), the receiver-SMTP MUST NOT send a notification. -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - The Scarlet Pimpernel Letter - An 18th-century English nobleman leads a double life, freeing comely young adulteresses from the prisons of post-Revolution France. - -Original Message- From: McNeill Alasdair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 6:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS They are probably NDRs! -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS Thanks for this. I get a message telling me that Relaying is prohibited which seems fine. However, if I look at the queue's in the IMS there are messages with nothing in the sender field. Is this normal? If it's not stuff being relayed then what could it be?? I'm confused! :) (well it is friday) -Original Message- From: McNeill Alasdair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 August 2001 11:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing the IMS You can telnet your self into your Exchange through port 25 then follow the artical! http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q153/1/19.asp If you can send a mail with an account that is not in your Ex Org then you have an open relay if you get an error then you do not relay mail! A McNeill -Original Message- From: Olds, Dominic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing the IMS Hi all I have a strange problem with the IMS on our Exchange 5.5 server. (SP4 running on WIN2k) The IMS appears to be set so as to prevent relaying but it looks like spam is still getting relayed. Is there a simple way to prove this suspicion one way or the other please? Many thanks Dom. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
Danish is better Fresh and warm with sliced pecans Drenched in caramel -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Cannot stand donuts. Rather have cookies instead. Chocolate chunk preferred. -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
hahah are you Danish, this is getting pornographic! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynne July Sent: August 24, 2001 2:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Danish is better Fresh and warm with sliced pecans Drenched in caramel -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Cannot stand donuts. Rather have cookies instead. Chocolate chunk preferred. -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: calendar slow to update
Think about it for a second -- in the first scenario (changing an appointment) it has to go to every appointment and CHANGE the date or whatever. In the second scenario, it's simply copying the new appointment over and over again. I bet it just takes longer to change a recycling appointment with no end date. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Despite the cost of living, have you noticed how it remains so popular? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chinnery Paul Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: calendar slow to update My apologies if this has already appeared. I originally posted this one, maybe two, days ago and although I did get a couple of 'out of office' replies, I don't recall seeing it posted. I've search Technet, archives and even posted to MS Usenet groups but haven't found an answer yet to the following situation: Server: dual P200, 256 meg RAM, NT 4.0 sp6, Exchange 5.5 sp4 In reference to: recurring appts in a calendar set up as a Public Folder Our Surgery dept. uses Outlook (v2000) calendar to show who's on call. Four entries, each set up as recurring all-day events with no end date. The problem: When you open just one entry (or even the series) and change it, when you click on Save/Close, it takes upwards of 23 seconds before the appt is closed. I've tried this on various pc's and tried different appt. entries but the time is almost always the same. The size of the calendar is approximately 3.5 meg. However, I did notice that if I create a new entry, with the same parameters as the others, I can modify it and the Save/Close happens rather quickly. Could a corrupted entry be causing such a slow update? Or, is it simply a matter of too much data to work with given the speed of the computer?Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Uninstalling EXCH2K
Is this the first E2K server in the org that you are removing/reinstalling? If it is, use ADSIedit or the likes, and remove the Exchange org from the Active Directory. Then re-install Exchange. Louise -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Uninstalling EXCH2K Yes I followed those steps. It's not prompting me for any new pertinent info such as Organiztion, If it's a new site or joining another site etc. John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm in the midst of uninstalling EXCH2K. I've completely removed it. But when I try to Install a fresh copy, it gives me the same setup as before. How can I get a completly fresh install? Is there some kind of switch I need use when I run setup? Please advise. Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:36 AM To: Exchange List (E-mail) Subject: Uninstalling EXCH2K I'm trying to uninstall EXCH2K. When uninstalling it tells me that I cannot select the Remove feature because there is one or more users using a mailbox store on this server. They thing is that there isn't any mailboxes on that store that I created. Are there system mailboxes that were created during install? If so, how do I get rid of them to compelete the uninstall? Thanks, John Bowles Exchange Administrator NT Server Workstation Team Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
OK, I have to ask! For someone whose general education isn't all to should be (degreed in Science and Engineering) could someone tell me what Haiku is? I think it is some form of Hawaiian poetry. Is that correct? If so, could someone describe it so I can enjoy this every Friday thing that happens around here. Thanks. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Situation is Bad for you, no Krispy Kremes I had lots today -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
Donuts cause cancer? My that is terrible news. Sell Krispy Kreme short! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lefkovics, William Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Lots of Krappy Kremes? You might need to get to know your oncologist. Next time you await a hot fix install perhaps why not a bagel? -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Situation is Bad for you, no Krispy Kremes I had lots today -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
Ed was not around. You do not really need Ed. You say it so well. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hunter, Lori Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts There are seldom technological solutions to behavioral problems. I can't believe no one else said it. Ed must be sleeping. :) -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attaching Files as Shortcuts Hello, We are running exchange5.5 with Outlook2000 clients. We would like to have the INSERT ATTACHMENT function default to inserting the file as a shortcut to the file rather than the default attachment as file. Is this possible with a registry entry or a profile of some type? We would like to cut back on the number of various file versions that float around in emails and have just shortcuts to the file on a fileserver. We would also like the option to attach the actual file, but we want it to not be the default. Any references would be greatly appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
http://webserver.datap.ca/users/pbrown/haiku/links.html -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Sometimes too much drink is not enough. - -Original Message- From: Bare, Ronald A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) OK, I have to ask! For someone whose general education isn't all to should be (degreed in Science and Engineering) could someone tell me what Haiku is? I think it is some form of Hawaiian poetry. Is that correct? If so, could someone describe it so I can enjoy this every Friday thing that happens around here. Thanks. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Situation is Bad for you, no Krispy Kremes I had lots today -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=haiku Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Rene Descartes Klingon: It is a good day to stop thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bare, Ronald A. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) OK, I have to ask! For someone whose general education isn't all to should be (degreed in Science and Engineering) could someone tell me what Haiku is? I think it is some form of Hawaiian poetry. Is that correct? If so, could someone describe it so I can enjoy this every Friday thing that happens around here. Thanks. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Situation is Bad for you, no Krispy Kremes I had lots today -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems...
If your boss is looking on monster for your job you got problems anyways! :) Our exchange server is primarily a method to discover where all adult beverages will be consumed over the weekends! :) -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... We know they're trying to kill us...we just haven't figured out why yet. Good suggestion about the resumethat way my boss won't see my name pop up on Monster -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... I see, so your company doesn't care enough about it's employees to feed them decent food? And just to throw some exchange into this... I'd put your resume in a secure public folder, providing a password only to potential employers ;) William -Original Message- From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... Yep. How many donuts? Well, I have one. The company orders several dozen. Enough to give 200 people a donut each :) lotsa variety. And every first Friday of the month is BBQ Friday, during the summer. Free hamburgers, hotdogs, pop, chips, etc. During the winter, it's free KFC instead of BBQ. Hehe. I dunno about the KFC thing. I just load up on the salads...the chicken seems to slow me down some. And just to throw some exchange into this...Exchange is an excellent resource to share recipes and schedule company events such as picnics, movie nights, etc. David. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 200 0 domain problems... Tim Hortons? -Original Message- From: Greg M. Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... OK, let's just slow down here. How MANY donuts do you have every Friday? Were they baked fresh today? Give me every detail. (on a diet) g. -Original Message- From: LBWL.GWIA.[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 8/24/2001 1:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000 domain problems... Just had a glazed sour cream donut.m Donut Friday every Friday. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
Twenty-five cents off Your very next purchase of Johnson Wax Drano! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Boehm, Diane M. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions If you had give me some technical advice to fix the technical problem I sure would send you a certificate. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Two comments, neither of which will immediately solve your problem[1]: 1. You're saying that you have a MAPI client installed on your Exchange server[2]? Generally considered A Bad Idea. 2. Nobody will touch it until you prove that the script isn't causing the problems? It's generally considered a logical fallacy to put the burden of the argument on proof of a negative. i.e. Prove that breathing DOESN'T cause cancer... You can't. Everyone who ever caught cancer has drawn breath. You can't have a valid control group until they back off their unreasonable stance. -tom [1] But in case one of them does, can I have a floor wax[3] gift certificate?[4] [2] ... when I open this room from the server where we configured the script... [3] New Shimmer! It's a floor wax AND a dessert topping! [4] Mike, I hope you have a Ben Jerry's one for me. They feed ya this Blue Bell stuff in Texas...ewww -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 03:19 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions I know that, but I am not in charge of clients or training. This has been a pet peeve of mine for over a year, but no one will touch it until we can prove that the script isn't causing all the problems. And why would this affect only this one room and not the other 49? I know users who look at the calendar this way on the other rooms and this is the only room that we see mismatched meetings between the server and the client. I have also created a brand new profile for this room on my workstation and opened the room on my workstation and I see exactly what we see when we do file, open other user's. The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server where we configured the script, and this view is where the requests are determined if they are accepted or not. So the meetings aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get booked for the same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions FYI Don't let the users open the rooms using file - open - other users folder. This can corrupt the f/b time on the mailbox/room. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions We have run /cleanfreebusy on this room almost every day since Feb. and it hasn't fixed it. Nothing else has changed and all the rooms are configured the same on this one server. Anything else anyone can think of Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.262.260.5330 There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems - Ed Crowley, Compaq -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Every once in a while I've had to open up the conference room mail box with the /cleanfreebusy switch. It usually cures similar problems. On one very rare occasion, I had to completely remove and reinstall the Autoaccept script-- I forget the details on why, though. It might have been around the time I switched servers and I didn't add the perms to the event service folder. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Since we are on the topic of the auto accept script, has anyone see this issue while using the script. We
RE: MEC Awards 2001
I agree there. We were ok until the 3rd one...The 4th one, well... Just imagine coming home every night and your house looks like meteor hit it on the inside. Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 I disagree. Two are easier. One requires much more attention. With two (reasonably closely together in age), they entertain each other much of the time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more difficult. I knew they were lying. M - Original Message - From: Neubauer, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ah don't worry - Someone one told me that two was 10 times harder than one They we lying to me. its 100 times harder! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least one of these. They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC to win. Visit http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more information and to enter. There are 10 categories: - Best Solution by a Partner - Best Solution by a Customer - Best Developer Tool - Best Infrastructure Product - Best Management Tool or Utility - Best Use of Mobile
RE: DOES NO ONE KNOW???? RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000domain problems...
Thanks for the reply Karen: Been there done that... We have a PDC locally connected to the same switch that is a GC. I even demoted it from a GC and followed the instructions at Q304403 on the support site to a T and re-promoted and rebooted the PDC. I did this because I felt the server may have been restarted before the GC had time to fully populate the first time around. It was rebooted immediately the first time of course to activate the NSPI. It was only later I found out you're supposed to wait a few moments for the GC to populate.. Is there any way to test to confirm the NSPI is fully functional? More background: The first DC/GC on the network is on the other side of a VPN (through Cisco PIX's with T1's) but there is a local DC/GC server. Both the local GC and the exchange server have been rebooted many times since these changes were made. Over the past few days I have had several instances where the original errors described have occurred and the only way to get the server back on line is to restart. Stopping and restarting the services doesn't help. Thanks again. Clint Nichols Director of Information Technology Athens Area School District [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Karen McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:02 PM To: Clint CHN. Nichols Subject:Re: DOES NO ONE KNOW RE: Exchange 2000 install in new Win 2000domain problems... The obvious problems it has, is some user can connect with Outlook other can't. They receive a name cannot be resolved error when trying. POP3 and web access works for ever account. Not so obvious client observations are that the global address list doesn't always show up at the client. I've seen this before and for us, the culprit was the Global Catalog. Exchange 2000 relies heavily on the GC, so I would look very carefully at your GC placement especially if clients are connecting over slow or unreliable WAN links. Another interesting point to consider is that a server that gets flagged as a GC must be rebooted before Exchange 2000 will see it as a GC. Stupid question, but have you rebooted your GC's since flagging them as such? Good luck. - Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
I totally agree with that. Sure they fight, but so what. They're fighting with *each other*, not you. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 I disagree. Two are easier. One requires much more attention. With two (reasonably closely together in age), they entertain each other much of the time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more difficult. I knew they were lying. M - Original Message - From: Neubauer, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ah don't worry - Someone one told me that two was 10 times harder than one They we lying to me. its 100 times harder! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least one of these. They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC to win. Visit http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more information and to enter. There are 10 categories: - Best Solution by a Partner - Best Solution by a Customer - Best Developer Tool - Best Infrastructure Product - Best Management Tool or Utility - Best Use of Mobile Technologies - Best Productivity Solution - Best Use of Workflow - Best
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
Are you making fun of me? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
Who?? if you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. thanks -Michèle Immigration site: http://LadySun1969.tripod.com Our new 2001 Miata: http://members.cardomain.com/bpituley Tiggercam: http://www.tiggercam.co.uk - Things always look darkest before they turn totally black. - -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts Are you making fun of me? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions
Forcing the proof of the negative is a good way to get rid of people, though! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Meunier Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Two comments, neither of which will immediately solve your problem[1]: 1. You're saying that you have a MAPI client installed on your Exchange server[2]? Generally considered A Bad Idea. 2. Nobody will touch it until you prove that the script isn't causing the problems? It's generally considered a logical fallacy to put the burden of the argument on proof of a negative. i.e. Prove that breathing DOESN'T cause cancer... You can't. Everyone who ever caught cancer has drawn breath. You can't have a valid control group until they back off their unreasonable stance. -tom [1] But in case one of them does, can I have a floor wax[3] gift certificate?[4] [2] ... when I open this room from the server where we configured the script... [3] New Shimmer! It's a floor wax AND a dessert topping! [4] Mike, I hope you have a Ben Jerry's one for me. They feed ya this Blue Bell stuff in Texas...ewww -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, August 23, 2001 03:19 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions I know that, but I am not in charge of clients or training. This has been a pet peeve of mine for over a year, but no one will touch it until we can prove that the script isn't causing all the problems. And why would this affect only this one room and not the other 49? I know users who look at the calendar this way on the other rooms and this is the only room that we see mismatched meetings between the server and the client. I have also created a brand new profile for this room on my workstation and opened the room on my workstation and I see exactly what we see when we do file, open other user's. The place that it is wrong is when I open this room from the server where we configured the script, and this view is where the requests are determined if they are accepted or not. So the meetings aren't getting written to this view, so multiple meetings get booked for the same time, but can only be seen from the user or another client. Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Semiglia, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions FYI Don't let the users open the rooms using file - open - other users folder. This can corrupt the f/b time on the mailbox/room. Michael Semiglia -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 3:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions We have run /cleanfreebusy on this room almost every day since Feb. and it hasn't fixed it. Nothing else has changed and all the rooms are configured the same on this one server. Anything else anyone can think of Diane Diane Boehm SC Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.262.260.5330 There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems - Ed Crowley, Compaq -Original Message- From: Mike Morrison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Every once in a while I've had to open up the conference room mail box with the /cleanfreebusy switch. It usually cures similar problems. On one very rare occasion, I had to completely remove and reinstall the Autoaccept script-- I forget the details on why, though. It might have been around the time I switched servers and I didn't add the perms to the event service folder. Mike Morrison NT/SMS/Exchange Administrator Ben Jerry's Homemade, Inc. -Original Message- From: Boehm, Diane M. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: auto booking conf. rooms w/ Outlook 2000 permissions Since we are on the topic of the auto accept script, has anyone see this issue while using the script. We have one room, out of 50, that when a client booking the room opens the calendar using file, open other user's, sees the meetings that have been booked. But when the calendar is opened on the server, the same location we used to configure the auto accept script for this room, we see only a few of the meetings that have been booked for the room.
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
Not at all. Congrats on catching Alain Prost. -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts Are you making fun of me? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
once that second one is up to the right age, of course. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net I wished the buck stopped here, as I could use a few. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 I disagree. Two are easier. One requires much more attention. With two (reasonably closely together in age), they entertain each other much of the time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more difficult. I knew they were lying. M - Original Message - From: Neubauer, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ah don't worry - Someone one told me that two was 10 times harder than one They we lying to me. its 100 times harder! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously consider nominating your product/solution(s) for at least one of these. They are global, and you don't have to exhibit at the MEC to win. Visit http://www.microsoft.com/corpevents/mec2001/awards.asp for more information and to enter.
RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?)
My boss really rocks He just said to me Go home! I think I'll do that. -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) http://www.dictionary.com/cgi-bin/dict.pl?term=haiku Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net Rene Descartes Klingon: It is a good day to stop thinking. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bare, Ronald A. Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) OK, I have to ask! For someone whose general education isn't all to should be (degreed in Science and Engineering) could someone tell me what Haiku is? I think it is some form of Hawaiian poetry. Is that correct? If so, could someone describe it so I can enjoy this every Friday thing that happens around here. Thanks. -Original Message- From: WILLIAMS,JESSICA D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Situation is Bad for you, no Krispy Kremes I had lots today -Original Message- From: Bueffel, Scott M - CNF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 12:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Krispy Kremes? Not here. Portland's to get one this year So far, nothing yet. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) Are you in Japan as well? What is that stuff at the bottom of your message? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg M. Hess Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Donut Haiku (Fridays right?) The donuts taste good Filled with thier creamy delights I am in heaven .+x )r뺷 ퟘ� zǭȱr:楞˱m [y z[)rÉ Z Zvh˧+-i٢2̞G( _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MEC Awards 2001
Naw, even before then.. The new baby is great toy! Andy David J Muller International -Original Message- From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 once that second one is up to the right age, of course. Drew (MOS) KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM: http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp Pics of Max are BACK! http://www.drewncapris.net I wished the buck stopped here, as I could use a few. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 I disagree. Two are easier. One requires much more attention. With two (reasonably closely together in age), they entertain each other much of the time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of missy koslosky Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 Funny. People keep telling me that a second won't make things more difficult. I knew they were lying. M - Original Message - From: Neubauer, Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:14 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ah don't worry - Someone one told me that two was 10 times harder than one They we lying to me. its 100 times harder! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Ahh.. such great encouragment once can receieve from this list. With the imminent birth of my second, my joy is turning into fear or the unknown.(1) --rex 1) At least with a computer it does what I expect it to do. Very logical and orderly.(2) 2) Except for those occasions when it does something totally unexpected. (3) 3) Usually those unexpected things can be traced back to my own silly actions at some point. -Original Message- From: Rosenthal, Daniel A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 Like you can't imagine. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 That must have hurt. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rosenthal, Daniel A. Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 You don't want to be away from home now...I had my second in March and still can't leave! -Original Message- From: Choi Rex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 airlines won't let a women who is due in 6 days fly.. liablity risk. Orlando is a bit too far to drive from Chicago.. Besides the need to stop ever hour for her to go to the bathroom, there is the risk of her going into labor and giving birth in the car.. or during one of the keynote sessions.. Naw.. I'll just have to pass this year and hit MEC next year. --rex -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MEC Awards 2001 You could bring your wife ... Martin - Original Message - From: Choi Rex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 5:50 PM Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 *sigh* I'd love to go to MEC this year.. unfortunatly, my wife is due with our 2nd baby the first week of October. Unless I wanted to be single again (I don't) it didn't seem like a good time to skip out for a week.. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC Awards 2001 What about Best Fish Tacos? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Earnest A. Glazener Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC Awards 2001 The deadline is Monday at noon Seattle time. You should seriously
RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts
If you're using the web interface to access this list, please be sure to click the box/button/whatever that includes the original message text. Thanks! Lori Hunter Exchange Goddess Citi Commerce Solutions -Original Message- From: Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Attaching Files as Shortcuts Are you making fun of me? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
forwarding email to the internet and another question
1- Where do I allow or disallow users from being able to forward email to the internet when they are gone for a long period of time? 2- Where do I disable the Out of Office messages from going to the internet. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
