email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting
Hi, is it possible to allow users to send messages to a public folder only by email and not allow them to post directly into that folder (or cut/paste)? This is regarding Exchange 5.5. Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to add to contacts or Addressee books.
Has something a bit similar recently, exchange 5.5. Outlook address book needed to be added as a service. Harriet -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jazzy144;yahoo.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 00:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to add to contacts or Addressee books. Have anyone ever run into this problem with users? There are users that can't add to contacts or addressee books. Using OutLook 200 and 2002. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automated PF...
James, Set the IMS to block the PF from allowing to send external? Cheers Paul Standards are like toothbrushes, everyone wants one but not yours -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automated PF... I think I have slightly different problem than I have seen here before: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4, running on a Win2k SP2 server, in an NT 4.0 domain. 2. Created a PF for our internal users, so that they could drag and drop their SPAM into, for further perusal by me, for blocking purposes. 3. Wanted to be polite and let them know (after dragging and dropping an item to the folder), that their contribution had been received. I set up the rule on the PF to fire off for every e-mail dragged into the folder. 4. It has had one unfortunate side effect. When dragging and dropping into the folder, the rule looks at the From... address and fires off to that address...exactly what I DON'T want it doing, because it fires off to the spammer. But as with most users, the process of copying and pasting Internet Headers into a new e-mail and sending to this folder is too difficult or time consuming for them. :::sheesh!::: And of course, forwarding the e-mail to the PF wipes out all the Internet Header info. So... Q1: I know this sounds stupid, but is there any way to get the rule to fire off to the inbox of the person that is actually doing the dragging and dropping? Q2: If not, does anyone know of a solution to my problem, short of delete and forget? I'd like to purchase a copy of SurfControl, but the $60k pricetag was a little spendy for my boss, even at a government site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *** The information contained in this message or any of its attachments may be confidential and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other dissemination or use of this communication is strictly prohibited without the express permission of the sender. The views expressed in this email are those of the individual and not necessarily those of Sony or Sony affiliated companies. Sony email is for business use only. This email and any response may be monitored by Sony United Kingdom Limited. (04) *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting
Give the default user create permissions on the folder. Uncheck folder visible. -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:usofwd;gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting Hi, is it possible to allow users to send messages to a public folder only by email and not allow them to post directly into that folder (or cut/paste)? This is regarding Exchange 5.5. Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K: automatic address list creation
Hi, is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name - Site - Department - Divison I can't find a way to do that automatically in E2K, I have to create each container separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? Regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting
User's must be able to read items in that folder, so I can't hide it. The idea is that when users mail to that folder they actually send to an DL which forwards a copy to a remote server where it's also posted in a PF. But if they cut/paste the remote server won't get a copy. Didn't want to fumble with InterOrg and stuff, it's going to be upgraded to E2K in a month time, maybe I can use stadard NNTP then. regards Uso - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:25 PM Subject: RE: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting Give the default user create permissions on the folder. Uncheck folder visible. -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:usofwd;gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: email to a public folder only - no cut/paste/posting Hi, is it possible to allow users to send messages to a public folder only by email and not allow them to post directly into that folder (or cut/paste)? This is regarding Exchange 5.5. Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO
I have tried saying: 1. Security risk 2. Bad Netiquitte 3. Risk of mail loops How about saying that you only send out one OoO message full stop, rather than one per day. If you go away for a fortnight and somebody sends you mail two Mondays in a row, on the first they'll get the OoO message, on the second they won't - and might presume your holiday is over. To get round this the user should have stated when he was back in his OoO message, and should have left another colleague's e-mail address as an alternative. I'd strongly advise getting this made into some sort of corporate policy before you turn OoO to internet on. That way when sales rep X forgets to set this up and loses several valuable customers, the onus of blame is on them, not you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automated PF...
The answer is, of course, to write an event script. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automated PF... I think I have slightly different problem than I have seen here before: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4, running on a Win2k SP2 server, in an NT 4.0 domain. 2. Created a PF for our internal users, so that they could drag and drop their SPAM into, for further perusal by me, for blocking purposes. 3. Wanted to be polite and let them know (after dragging and dropping an item to the folder), that their contribution had been received. I set up the rule on the PF to fire off for every e-mail dragged into the folder. 4. It has had one unfortunate side effect. When dragging and dropping into the folder, the rule looks at the From... address and fires off to that address...exactly what I DON'T want it doing, because it fires off to the spammer. But as with most users, the process of copying and pasting Internet Headers into a new e-mail and sending to this folder is too difficult or time consuming for them. :::sheesh!::: And of course, forwarding the e-mail to the PF wipes out all the Internet Header info. So... Q1: I know this sounds stupid, but is there any way to get the rule to fire off to the inbox of the person that is actually doing the dragging and dropping? Q2: If not, does anyone know of a solution to my problem, short of delete and forget? I'd like to purchase a copy of SurfControl, but the $60k pricetag was a little spendy for my boss, even at a government site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automated PF...
The answer is, of course, to write an event script. Edgar J. Crowley Jr. Technical Consultant Windows Messaging Platforms Practice hp Services *510-612-3365 *[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Blunt, James H (Jim) Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automated PF... I think I have slightly different problem than I have seen here before: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4, running on a Win2k SP2 server, in an NT 4.0 domain. 2. Created a PF for our internal users, so that they could drag and drop their SPAM into, for further perusal by me, for blocking purposes. 3. Wanted to be polite and let them know (after dragging and dropping an item to the folder), that their contribution had been received. I set up the rule on the PF to fire off for every e-mail dragged into the folder. 4. It has had one unfortunate side effect. When dragging and dropping into the folder, the rule looks at the From... address and fires off to that address...exactly what I DON'T want it doing, because it fires off to the spammer. But as with most users, the process of copying and pasting Internet Headers into a new e-mail and sending to this folder is too difficult or time consuming for them. :::sheesh!::: And of course, forwarding the e-mail to the PF wipes out all the Internet Header info. So... Q1: I know this sounds stupid, but is there any way to get the rule to fire off to the inbox of the person that is actually doing the dragging and dropping? Q2: If not, does anyone know of a solution to my problem, short of delete and forget? I'd like to purchase a copy of SurfControl, but the $60k pricetag was a little spendy for my boss, even at a government site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automated PF...
James, What I have users do is attach the SPAM to an email. I created a GAL entry that they can send the email with the attached SPAM to. I am not using a rule to reply back. I pretty much have everyone believing that there is only so much you can do. Mort Billups Crowley Maritime Corporation -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:jhblunt;bhi-erc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Automated PF... I think I have slightly different problem than I have seen here before: 1. Exchange 5.5 SP4, running on a Win2k SP2 server, in an NT 4.0 domain. 2. Created a PF for our internal users, so that they could drag and drop their SPAM into, for further perusal by me, for blocking purposes. 3. Wanted to be polite and let them know (after dragging and dropping an item to the folder), that their contribution had been received. I set up the rule on the PF to fire off for every e-mail dragged into the folder. 4. It has had one unfortunate side effect. When dragging and dropping into the folder, the rule looks at the From... address and fires off to that address...exactly what I DON'T want it doing, because it fires off to the spammer. But as with most users, the process of copying and pasting Internet Headers into a new e-mail and sending to this folder is too difficult or time consuming for them. :::sheesh!::: And of course, forwarding the e-mail to the PF wipes out all the Internet Header info. So... Q1: I know this sounds stupid, but is there any way to get the rule to fire off to the inbox of the person that is actually doing the dragging and dropping? Q2: If not, does anyone know of a solution to my problem, short of delete and forget? I'd like to purchase a copy of SurfControl, but the $60k pricetag was a little spendy for my boss, even at a government site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions
Won't work on newer (3.80) versions of Scanmail - it checks the file signature rather than the extension. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: ExchangeAdminList [mailto:ExchangeAdminList;state.mt.us] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions Bill - In the few instances I needed to do this I renamed the .exe to something like .exe1 and sent it. I instructed the receiver to rename the file back to .exe when they get it. Not too efficient but it works. Thanks, Amy -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:bmellott;SND.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vendors AV and attachment exceptions Pondering new AV for Exch Running a AV for exchange (chose your favorite vendor..insert here) and implementing Martins list of death...As I do and suspect many here do similaror something similar... SO I pose this: say you set your AV to block/strip EXE attachments on your exchange box.. .. OK so this = goodsafer..etc... Now if you have say an app on your system which sends out a EXE..what have you.. (say a fax program for the viewer etc..) My Question is What do you others do with your AV on Exchnage to allow this EXE to go out but not allow all the other bad EXE's to get thru? Why? I contemplating replacing my current AV vendor...and have looked at some others BUT it would appear None of the others have the ability to make exceptions for identified EXE's And I wondering what anybody else does 2 cent would be appreciated. thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mail Servers
And since I am on two different domains, it looks like moving the mailboxes is out. I have to use Exmerge. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers As long as the original server is still online it should tell the client that the mailbox is now homed on the other server, and the client's profile will be updated accordingly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-311248;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers The new server is on another domain. 2. Bring up a new Windows 2000 server in the same AD domain as the existing server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers If you followed Ed's Method it will. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Really? I don't think 2000 will change the profile on the fly. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There is the option of asking users to do it themselves. I am trying to avoid visiting each user. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List
RE: survey - max users per server
As do the newer versions of Scanmail -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 12:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: survey - max users per server Not even close to infinity. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: survey - max users per server 5,226 users on a single 500 Xeon Compaq Server, 90 gig priv with 50 gigs of white space. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: survey - max users per server Just curious. Who's got the most users on a single server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
That's pretty accurate. There isn't a hard limit, but it does put a much higher than normal per user load on the OWA box. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi connections in the range of a few hundred pre box? Why on earth would I think that.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users What is the setting in IIS configured for? Otherwise... lots! William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum OWA concurrent users MSX55+SP4 1 MSXorganization 1 server Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Encryption Help
I hope someone can help me out here. I am trying to setup encryption between ourselves and our patent attorney. We us E2K and they are on Lotus (X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002). I can send them encrypted mail, but when the send me encrypted mail it shows as a blank message. When it first arrives in Outlook I see no paperclip in the list view. If I then doubleclick to open and then close the paperclip appears. But there is no visible attachment. In the message header I see: --_-==11AA8DFD213==-_ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; name=smime.p7m Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m If I open the message in my IMAP client (Mulberry) I see an attachment called smime.p7m but it appears to be blank. The legal firm runs their own cert. Server and I got a certificate for the IT guy and he also sent me his root cert. Which I also added to his contact. So I can send him encrypted messages. The certificates I got from the legal firm have a .p7c extension. So is this a problem here or a problem on their end? TIA. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000
crap... I can't reproduce this behavior on my corporate Exchange 2000 environment. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 I just hope that when I call PSS, they would be able to escalate and fix it. We rely on global security groups that need to be mail-enabled, and our hosting architecture uses a windows account that's a member of these groups but is not mail-enabled. I do not want to mail-enable this account because we then would pay Exchange license fees for it to Microsoft (each customer has an account like that). -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 Good job.. And thanks for sharing.. Simple solutions are often at the bottom of the list of things to try. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 This has been a nagging issue for a long time. I have not been able to send mail to certain groups - messages would just get stuck in the Retry Queue Awaiting Directory Lookup. This was also coincidental with IIS memory leak. I can't believe how simple the cause of the problem is! The groups that experience problems are mail-enabled global security groups AND some members of the group are not mail-enabled. That's all. I have been looking at all other things trying to solve the problem. I thought that for some reason there was a duplication of an SMTP address somewhere (actually that used to be another bug in earlier version of Exchange 2000) or maybe the LegacyExchangeDN was screwed up... I can't believe it did not occur to me to check all the group's members to see if any of them were somehow different. Now we do have a reason for having such mixed groups for customer provisioning methods. Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com P.S. please consider this bug officially claimed by Andrey Fyodorov, the founder of the Scientific Jiggle Method and the Scientific Poking Around method. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: automatic address list creation
You can build them by using LDAP queries - Original Message - From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:48 AM Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation Hi, is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name - Site - Department - Divison I can't find a way to do that automatically in E2K, I have to create each container separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? Regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission
How can I set public folder permissions so that users can create them, but not delete them? This would apply to child folders not root public folders. (In the root public folders delete is grayed out) Permissions in Outlook seem to apply to items within the folder but not the folder itself. Looks like a lot of Exchange admins are having similar problems with users deleting folders. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA 2000 login prompt
I'm curious - why do you ask if any of the public folders are on a cluster? Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards;watrust.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt No, None of the public folder are on clustered servers. Just one back-end server. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:JMcBee;cta.net] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 8:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA 2000 login prompt Are any of your public folders on clustered back-end servers? -Original Message- From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:AEdwards;watrust.com] Posted At: Thursday, October 17, 2002 12:01 PM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: OWA 2000 login prompt Subject: OWA 2000 login prompt Hi, I have an annoying problem with our front-end OWA 2000. Everytime a user logs in and clicks on the folders view, it promps for authentication from owa server name.domain name.com. The only way to get past the login prompt is to either hit escape, which gives you a Login failed or cancelled error, or enter the OWA server's local administrator authentication. After you hit escape and ok, it works just fine though. I have this feeling it's a permissions problem, but I'm not sure on what. In Internet Services Manager, I have basic authentication checked on the Exchange virtual directory level and Anonymous Access (using the local IUSR_Server Name user) at the website level. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Aaron This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This message and any attachments have been scanned for viruses during transmission from Washington Trust Bank. NOTICE: This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged material and is intended for use solely by the above-referenced recipient. Any review, copying, printing, disclosure, distribution, or other use by any other person or entity is strictly prohibited. If you are not the named recipient, or believe you have received this e-mail in error, please reply to the sender and delete the copy you received. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Database Location
I am just about finished with setting up my new Exchange 2000 server on the new domain. I have created an 18igig partition for my logs and OS and a 36gig RAID 5 for my database. The only thing I have on the RAID 5 is the .edb and the .stm. As you can tell I am still learning. Is there anything else I need to point to the RAID 5 drive? Thanks for the patience. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mail Servers
Is it safe to assume that you are unable to move mailboxes from one Exchange server in one domain to another Exchange box in a different domain? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers As long as the original server is still online it should tell the client that the mailbox is now homed on the other server, and the client's profile will be updated accordingly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-311248;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers The new server is on another domain. 2. Bring up a new Windows 2000 server in the same AD domain as the existing server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers If you followed Ed's Method it will. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Really? I don't think 2000 will change the profile on the fly. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There is the option of asking users to do it themselves. I am trying to avoid visiting each user. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
Re: Omtool
Well the 19K's were used for a reason as most if not all regular Fax machines can not communicate faster than 19K in the older days. Not sure now but how cares. Everything is done via Web and Messaging - Original Message - From: Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Omtool Ha - thats funny. I too worked for Inacom/Vanstar and the account I was on (Alcoa) had a huge installed base of Fax Sr. Didn't really do much with it though. I do remember these funky 19kbs modems we had to use because Fax sr didn't like the 56k USRs we bought. The only site with a digital modem bank was the corporate HQ. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users
oooh, bad me, I didn't read back far enough. I'm not 2k, not 5.5. :/ I'll go stand in my corner now. -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:39 PM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users U actually I have a production server that has held around 1000 concurrent users on OWA. HOWEVER, these are the **lowest** of all _low end users_... Server is a Compaq 8500, 8GB RAM, 8 Proc, on a SAN. Users=966 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:14:15 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Users=988 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:15:16 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Users=988 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:16:17 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Users=1006 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:17:18 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Users=1006 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:18:19 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Users=983 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:19:20 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Users=983 OWA loadtime=0 secs-10/21/2002 11:20:21 AM Sliding Ave=0 secs Running Ave=0.17 secs Before putting this server into production, we investigated the maximum number of users - the numbers differ depending on who ran the tests. So, assuming everyone is right, you can have between 200 - 800 users (depending on who wrote the docs). Again, let me stress exactly how low end, low stress, low impact, low volume, low EVERYthing our users are. Ali Wilkes Borders Group, Inc. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:missy;mail-resources.com] Posted At: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:24 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Maximum OWA concurrent users Subject: Re: Maximum OWA concurrent users There's no allowed number of connections, per se, but IIS starts crapping out after about 200 concurrent OWA sessions. I don't have a specific reference for this, but I did some extensive testing on this a couple years ago, and this was what we found. Missy - Original Message - From: Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:33 PM Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I have looked High and low, cannot seem to find the answer to this one.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Hey! Your in the Jr Cadet league too! -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Well go find the answer then report Back Jr Cadet Blackstone. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users I dunno, But I was thinking the same thing though I don't have any evidence to support it. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users Why does it stick in my head that you were limited to a Number of mapi connections in the range of a few hundred pre box? Why on earth would I think that.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Maximum OWA concurrent users What is the setting in IIS configured for? Otherwise... lots! William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-104116;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Microsoft Exchange List Server Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Maximum OWA concurrent users MSX55+SP4 1 MSXorganization 1 server Does anobody know the maximum OWA concurrent users allowed in MSX55enterprise version? and MSX5.5 non-enterprise version? Thanks, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error
FYI, the problem was fixed with a patch on my firewall..thanks for the replies though. Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error Well like most Firewalls they lock everything and you have to punch holes in it. Relaying should be allowed to those that successfully Authenticate. Check your setting for same. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error I am running 5.5 SP4 and I have ESMTP turned on, I was wondering about the other settings noted below -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error If your running Exchange 2000 and I assuming this, you need the Firewall Software/Hardware to allow ESMTP protocol traffic for Messaging to flow. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error Can anyone tell me what to do here? I just installed a Symantec Velociraptor firewall. Here is the message my firewall is showing, (I removed the original email addresses to protect the innocent) smtpd Warning: Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=2844 from [207.114.164.37] tried to send to '[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt In my smpt protocol settings on the firewall I have the following choices: of which only ESMTP is checked: Enable ESMTP - Provides access to the Extended Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. ESMTP is enabled by default. When it is enabled, the other service extensions on this tab can be enabled. Enable AUTH (Authentication) - Allows client to send user name and password to authenticate with the server. Authentication is enabled by default. Note: SEF/SEVPN does not support authentication mechanisms that result in the connection being encrypted. Enable ATRN (Authenticated turn) - Allows an on-demand mail relay from the server to the client by turning the existing connection around. ATRN is disabled by default. Enable ETRN (Extended turn- Allows the client to access mail. In this case, the server is requested to initiate a separate connection to the client for the purpose of mail relay from server to the client. ETRN is disabled by default. Enable EXPN (Expansion) - Allows for the expansion of mailing lists. EXPN is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Enable VRFY (Verify) - Allows verification of mail addresses. VRFY is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Should I have any other of these options checked to allow these emails to pass thru? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Changing Mail Servers
You can move the mailbox *data*, but not the mailbox as an entity. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Is it safe to assume that you are unable to move mailboxes from one Exchange server in one domain to another Exchange box in a different domain? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers As long as the original server is still online it should tell the client that the mailbox is now homed on the other server, and the client's profile will be updated accordingly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-311248;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers The new server is on another domain. 2. Bring up a new Windows 2000 server in the same AD domain as the existing server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers If you followed Ed's Method it will. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Really? I don't think 2000 will change the profile on the fly. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There is the option of asking users to do it themselves. I am trying to avoid visiting each user. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Database Location
make sure you don't point anything else at the RAID5 volume. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Database Location I am just about finished with setting up my new Exchange 2000 server on the new domain. I have created an 18igig partition for my logs and OS and a 36gig RAID 5 for my database. The only thing I have on the RAID 5 is the .edb and the .stm. As you can tell I am still learning. Is there anything else I need to point to the RAID 5 drive? Thanks for the patience. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error
What did the patch do? - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error FYI, the problem was fixed with a patch on my firewall..thanks for the replies though. Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error Well like most Firewalls they lock everything and you have to punch holes in it. Relaying should be allowed to those that successfully Authenticate. Check your setting for same. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error I am running 5.5 SP4 and I have ESMTP turned on, I was wondering about the other settings noted below -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error If your running Exchange 2000 and I assuming this, you need the Firewall Software/Hardware to allow ESMTP protocol traffic for Messaging to flow. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error Can anyone tell me what to do here? I just installed a Symantec Velociraptor firewall. Here is the message my firewall is showing, (I removed the original email addresses to protect the innocent) smtpd Warning: Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=2844 from [207.114.164.37] tried to send to '[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt In my smpt protocol settings on the firewall I have the following choices: of which only ESMTP is checked: Enable ESMTP - Provides access to the Extended Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. ESMTP is enabled by default. When it is enabled, the other service extensions on this tab can be enabled. Enable AUTH (Authentication) - Allows client to send user name and password to authenticate with the server. Authentication is enabled by default. Note: SEF/SEVPN does not support authentication mechanisms that result in the connection being encrypted. Enable ATRN (Authenticated turn) - Allows an on-demand mail relay from the server to the client by turning the existing connection around. ATRN is disabled by default. Enable ETRN (Extended turn- Allows the client to access mail. In this case, the server is requested to initiate a separate connection to the client for the purpose of mail relay from server to the client. ETRN is disabled by default. Enable EXPN (Expansion) - Allows for the expansion of mailing lists. EXPN is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Enable VRFY (Verify) - Allows verification of mail addresses. VRFY is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Should I have any other of these options checked to allow these emails to pass thru? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contacts view:
Hi Guys, We recently migrated to Exchange 2000 sp3 (enterprise) and OL-XP on the client side. In Outlook 98 when you create a new message, click To: and change to Contacts, all the contacts are listed with e-mail, business fax and the Like listed to the side of the name. Is there a way to make that happen in Outlook XP. Currently all the user is seeing is the name listed 5 times And they are having to guess which one is the one they need, or they have to scroll way over to the right. I looked at Q305361, but is there a better way? Thanks, Raj - ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption Help
Have him send a test message to something like Yahoo mail. If it still breaks, it's his. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:jliddil;phytoceutica.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption Help I hope someone can help me out here. I am trying to setup encryption between ourselves and our patent attorney. We us E2K and they are on Lotus (X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002). I can send them encrypted mail, but when the send me encrypted mail it shows as a blank message. When it first arrives in Outlook I see no paperclip in the list view. If I then doubleclick to open and then close the paperclip appears. But there is no visible attachment. In the message header I see: --_-==11AA8DFD213==-_ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; name=smime.p7m Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m If I open the message in my IMAP client (Mulberry) I see an attachment called smime.p7m but it appears to be blank. The legal firm runs their own cert. Server and I got a certificate for the IT guy and he also sent me his root cert. Which I also added to his contact. So I can send him encrypted messages. The certificates I got from the legal firm have a .p7c extension. So is this a problem here or a problem on their end? TIA. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
I had a similar setup at my old place. We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from exch server to itself over night. However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot was a mirror of the exch server. that way, when (and it did) the exch server went down, I simply took out the exch server and booted the backup (used netdom to remove and add the servers to the network)into its secondary config. Ran isinteg patches etc and voila was online in about an hour or so. disadvantage was that it lost the days emails tho... Rob -Original Message- From: Brian Dugas [mailto:brian;summit-technical.com] Sent: 21 October 2002 17:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) What if you kept a DR server on its own network separate from the production network, then if the production server fails, you simply move the DR server to the production netowrk. You would need a PDC on the DR network too. Brian -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it fred_bloggs for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. Cheers Greg Heywood Technology Project Manager International Power PLC Phone +44 20 7320 8672 Fax +44 20 7320 8725 www.ipplc.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** Please note that neither International Power plc nor the sender accepts any responsibility for any viruses that may be contained in this e-mail or its attachments. It is therefore your responsibility to ensure that your systems have adequate protection against virus infection. The information contained in this e-mail is intended only for the use of the intended recipient at the e-mail address to which it has been addressed. If the reader of this message is not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any review, dissemination or copying of the message or associated attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please contact the sender by return e-mail or call +44 207 320 8600 and ask for the sender and then delete it immediately from your system. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption Help
At this point I have found out that they use Tumbleweed on the smtp side. I set up Netscape and even it can not see the attachment or even attempt to decrypt it. But the file is there when I look at the source. I have now Gone through the sign, encrypt decrypt process with two other folks and it worked just fine. No I just need to convince the IT at the law office that it would seem Tumbleweed is not configured to work with us. Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption Help Have him send a test message to something like Yahoo mail. If it still breaks, it's his. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:jliddil;phytoceutica.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption Help I hope someone can help me out here. I am trying to setup encryption between ourselves and our patent attorney. We us E2K and they are on Lotus (X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002). I can send them encrypted mail, but when the send me encrypted mail it shows as a blank message. When it first arrives in Outlook I see no paperclip in the list view. If I then doubleclick to open and then close the paperclip appears. But there is no visible attachment. In the message header I see: --_-==11AA8DFD213==-_ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; name=smime.p7m Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m If I open the message in my IMAP client (Mulberry) I see an attachment called smime.p7m but it appears to be blank. The legal firm runs their own cert. Server and I got a certificate for the IT guy and he also sent me his root cert. Which I also added to his contact. So I can send him encrypted messages. The certificates I got from the legal firm have a .p7c extension. So is this a problem here or a problem on their end? TIA. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL information
Ken, Try Imanami SmartR Tom -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com] Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 2:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL information Sorry if this is a repeat post, I first posted on the web and have not seen it yet. I need to gather DL information for 6 Exchange 5.5 Orgs and was wondering if anyone knows of a good tool. I ran the extract in the administrative console, but that only gives Alias, SMTP, and basic information. I am about to whip up a batch file that runs ONDL in the BORK to extract the members and numbers of members by plugging in the Aliases from the extract, but was wondering if anyone has a better solution. I am also supposed to get the owner of the DL, but I have not come up with an automated solution for that yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000
this is very elusive. I can't reproduce this *under normal cirumstances*, i.e. create a user account with mailbox, create another user account without a mailbox, create a group, mail-enabled it, add both user accounts to the group, send a test message to the group. The groups that do not work are built like this: - each customer has a separate OU - inside the customer OU there are all the user accounts and group accounts for the customer. - each customer has a global security group AllUsers@[customer.com] and every customer's user account is automatically added to the group. The group is mail-enabled. - Each customer has an account called Service (UserPrincipalName=Service@[customer.com]), Service is also a member of AllUsers@[customer.com] group. Service account does not have a mailbox. - Messages sent to AllUsers@[customer.com] get stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue. - If I create a mailbox for Service, messages flow normally. If I delete the mailbox, messages get stuck again. We have a few thousand customers, so there are a few thousand groups called AllUsers@[customer.com], and each group has its own Service user as a member. I wonder if the categorizer runs out of steam trying to resolve the correct Service without a mailbox out of thousands. Although the UPN clearly states which one is which... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 crap... I can't reproduce this behavior on my corporate Exchange 2000 environment. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 I just hope that when I call PSS, they would be able to escalate and fix it. We rely on global security groups that need to be mail-enabled, and our hosting architecture uses a windows account that's a member of these groups but is not mail-enabled. I do not want to mail-enable this account because we then would pay Exchange license fees for it to Microsoft (each customer has an account like that). -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 Good job.. And thanks for sharing.. Simple solutions are often at the bottom of the list of things to try. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 This has been a nagging issue for a long time. I have not been able to send mail to certain groups - messages would just get stuck in the Retry Queue Awaiting Directory Lookup. This was also coincidental with IIS memory leak. I can't believe how simple the cause of the problem is! The groups that experience problems are mail-enabled global security groups AND some members of the group are not mail-enabled. That's all. I have been looking at all other things trying to solve the problem. I thought that for some reason there was a duplication of an SMTP address somewhere (actually that used to be another bug in earlier version of Exchange 2000) or maybe the LegacyExchangeDN was screwed up... I can't believe it did not occur to me to check all the group's members to see if any of them were somehow different. Now we do have a reason for having such mixed groups for customer provisioning methods. Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com P.S. please consider this bug officially claimed by Andrey Fyodorov, the founder of the Scientific Jiggle Method and the Scientific Poking Around method. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Encryption Help
I used to work with WorldTalk (now Tumbleweed) WorldSecure server and set up server-to-server mail encryption. Granted it was betwenn to Tumbleweed servers. The servers exchanged the public keys with each other and then they were able to send encrypted mail back-and-forth without problems. Now did you get a public key from the Tumbleweed server? -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:jliddil;phytoceutica.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption Help At this point I have found out that they use Tumbleweed on the smtp side. I set up Netscape and even it can not see the attachment or even attempt to decrypt it. But the file is there when I look at the source. I have now Gone through the sign, encrypt decrypt process with two other folks and it worked just fine. No I just need to convince the IT at the law office that it would seem Tumbleweed is not configured to work with us. Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption Help Have him send a test message to something like Yahoo mail. If it still breaks, it's his. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:jliddil;phytoceutica.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption Help I hope someone can help me out here. I am trying to setup encryption between ourselves and our patent attorney. We us E2K and they are on Lotus (X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002). I can send them encrypted mail, but when the send me encrypted mail it shows as a blank message. When it first arrives in Outlook I see no paperclip in the list view. If I then doubleclick to open and then close the paperclip appears. But there is no visible attachment. In the message header I see: --_-==11AA8DFD213==-_ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; name=smime.p7m Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m If I open the message in my IMAP client (Mulberry) I see an attachment called smime.p7m but it appears to be blank. The legal firm runs their own cert. Server and I got a certificate for the IT guy and he also sent me his root cert. Which I also added to his contact. So I can send him encrypted messages. The certificates I got from the legal firm have a .p7c extension. So is this a problem here or a problem on their end? TIA. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can't send attachment with mail
Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation failed operation I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL information
When you run the Admin Extract and specify a filename, it looks in filename to see what heading line you have given it. It will extract all elements that match your heading line. Either use Admin in /R format to get the correct field names, or better still use the HEADER.EXE that does this in a more controlled manner. -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:Ken.Hatley;bankofamerica.com] Sent: 18 October 2002 19:52 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL information Sorry if this is a repeat post, I first posted on the web and have not seen it yet. I need to gather DL information for 6 Exchange 5.5 Orgs and was wondering if anyone knows of a good tool. I ran the extract in the administrative console, but that only gives Alias, SMTP, and basic information. I am about to whip up a batch file that runs ONDL in the BORK to extract the members and numbers of members by plugging in the Aliases from the extract, but was wondering if anyone has a better solution. I am also supposed to get the owner of the DL, but I have not come up with an automated solution for that yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
550 Relaying Denied
I have an exchange server that has domain_a as it's default address. I have a number of users who have additional addresses of user@domain_b. They are getting a 550 Relaying Denied error when sending from their domain_b address. I'm new to Exchange admin. so I'm not sure where the setting would be to allow sending of emails with other domain names. Your help is much appreciated! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exch 5.5 ost synch
I have two Exch 5.5 sites where every user receives synch errors, usually to the inbox and sent folders. Its not at the client. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Encryption Help
What I got were a Secure Server (proxy) and a (default) Both say they are for a server and not an individual. Both have a RSA Public Key. I queried their cert-server and got back the cert for the IT person. Then he sent me the root Digital ID for the law firm. I tried to add it via the add to addressbook button but that failed. So I exported it and the imported to the contact for the guy. I have it in the Cert store as I looked via the mmc. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:afyodorov;innerhost.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption Help I used to work with WorldTalk (now Tumbleweed) WorldSecure server and set up server-to-server mail encryption. Granted it was betwenn to Tumbleweed servers. The servers exchanged the public keys with each other and then they were able to send encrypted mail back-and-forth without problems. Now did you get a public key from the Tumbleweed server? -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:jliddil;phytoceutica.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption Help At this point I have found out that they use Tumbleweed on the smtp side. I set up Netscape and even it can not see the attachment or even attempt to decrypt it. But the file is there when I look at the source. I have now Gone through the sign, encrypt decrypt process with two other folks and it worked just fine. No I just need to convince the IT at the law office that it would seem Tumbleweed is not configured to work with us. Jim Liddil -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:danielc;dc-resources.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Encryption Help Have him send a test message to something like Yahoo mail. If it still breaks, it's his. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:jliddil;phytoceutica.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Encryption Help I hope someone can help me out here. I am trying to setup encryption between ourselves and our patent attorney. We us E2K and they are on Lotus (X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.10 March 22, 2002). I can send them encrypted mail, but when the send me encrypted mail it shows as a blank message. When it first arrives in Outlook I see no paperclip in the list view. If I then doubleclick to open and then close the paperclip appears. But there is no visible attachment. In the message header I see: --_-==11AA8DFD213==-_ Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-mime; name=smime.p7m Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7m If I open the message in my IMAP client (Mulberry) I see an attachment called smime.p7m but it appears to be blank. The legal firm runs their own cert. Server and I got a certificate for the IT guy and he also sent me his root cert. Which I also added to his contact. So I can send him encrypted messages. The certificates I got from the legal firm have a .p7c extension. So is this a problem here or a problem on their end? TIA. Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't send attachment with mail
Is the attachment larger than your limit settings? - Original Message - From: Niko [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:32 AM Subject: Can't send attachment with mail Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation failed operation I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: 550 Relaying Denied
Post the exact ndr pls. -Original Message- From: Sean Brandt [mailto:sean.brandt;lonelyplanet.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 5:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 550 Relaying Denied I have an exchange server that has domain_a as it's default address. I have a number of users who have additional addresses of user@domain_b. They are getting a 550 Relaying Denied error when sending from their domain_b address. I'm new to Exchange admin. so I'm not sure where the setting would be to allow sending of emails with other domain names. Your help is much appreciated! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
Er... Eseutil /r? Probably not a point I'd be at before being on the phone with PSS or having done a boatload more torubleshooting than is evidenced here. Restore from your last good backup and replay the transaction logs. -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:niko_n;mail.tel-aviv.gov.il] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't send attachment with mail Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation failed operation I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contacts view:
Add them all to the To line and remove the ones they don't need. Or hack the outlib(?) dll to add the functionality back. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:RPILLAI;dancona.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Contacts view: Hi Guys, We recently migrated to Exchange 2000 sp3 (enterprise) and OL-XP on the client side. In Outlook 98 when you create a new message, click To: and change to Contacts, all the contacts are listed with e-mail, business fax and the Like listed to the side of the name. Is there a way to make that happen in Outlook XP. Currently all the user is seeing is the name listed 5 times And they are having to guess which one is the one they need, or they have to scroll way over to the right. I looked at Q305361, but is there a better way? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
A couple of things. Make sure you are not using Word as your email editor. Try disabling any Exchange AV, restart and test again. -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:niko_n;mail.tel-aviv.gov.il] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 6:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't send attachment with mail Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation failed operation I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000
Also I see this in the Application Event log every time I force a retry on the stuck Awaiting Directory Lookup queue (I do have plenty of disk space): Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeTransport Event Category: Categorizer Event ID: 6004 Date: 10/22/2002 Time: 6:15:42 PM User: N/A Computer: SHFEX01 Description: The categorizer is unable to categorize messages due to a retryable error. There is not enough space on the disk. : 70 00 00 00 p... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 this is very elusive. I can't reproduce this *under normal cirumstances*, i.e. create a user account with mailbox, create another user account without a mailbox, create a group, mail-enabled it, add both user accounts to the group, send a test message to the group. The groups that do not work are built like this: - each customer has a separate OU - inside the customer OU there are all the user accounts and group accounts for the customer. - each customer has a global security group AllUsers@[customer.com] and every customer's user account is automatically added to the group. The group is mail-enabled. - Each customer has an account called Service (UserPrincipalName=Service@[customer.com]), Service is also a member of AllUsers@[customer.com] group. Service account does not have a mailbox. - Messages sent to AllUsers@[customer.com] get stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue. - If I create a mailbox for Service, messages flow normally. If I delete the mailbox, messages get stuck again. We have a few thousand customers, so there are a few thousand groups called AllUsers@[customer.com], and each group has its own Service user as a member. I wonder if the categorizer runs out of steam trying to resolve the correct Service without a mailbox out of thousands. Although the UPN clearly states which one is which... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Anti-Delete Permission
Hmm.. I've never had that problem. How does one get that problem? Looks like a lot of Exchange admins are having similar problems with users deleting folders. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mail Servers
Exchange knows not of any domain concept which would apply to the moving of mailboxes. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish. Teach a man to fish, you give up your monopoly on fisheries. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Is it safe to assume that you are unable to move mailboxes from one Exchange server in one domain to another Exchange box in a different domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K: automatic address list creation
Given enough $ there's a tool to do everything. -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:usofwd;gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation Hi, is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name - Site - Department - Divison I can't find a way to do that automatically in E2K, I have to create each container separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? Regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Address Book Listings
Change the display name format to last name, first name. -Original Message- From: Todd Boynton [mailto:tboynton;maine.edu] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Address Book Listings When a user is creating new mail and clicks on To... to bring up the address book to add names to the message, Is there an easy way to have names sorted by last name, first name instead of the display name? Outlook 2002 and Exchange 2000 Todd Boynton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==Communications Specialist == UNET Technology Services, Network Operations == Maine School and Library Network ==University of Maine System _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Custom Forms with Outlook 2002 (preview pane).
You could use a custom preview pane extension instead of the built in one. As mentioned in the article, the use of vbscript is a non-factor in the Outlook 2002 version of the preview pane. Or you could simply implement the workaround mentioned in the article. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 -Original Message- From: Warren Cundy [mailto:warrenc;yaletech.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Custom Forms with Outlook 2002 (preview pane). We use some custom forms here, and we are looking to upgrade to Office XP. Unfortunately, Outlook 2002 has a problem with custom forms, at least as far as displaying them in the preview pane, see here for details: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q288754 Is there a way around this issue? I've looked around slipstick.com, but can't see anything. How have others dealt with this annoyance? We don't use VBScript in our forms.. Thanks -Warren _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing)
Short answer? Yes. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 EMS: Disaster Continuity for Mission Critical Messaging -Original Message- From: Greg Heywood [mailto:greg.heywood;ipplc.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Quick disaster recovery question (if there is such thing) We are looking at keeping an online spare server. I presume I can call it fred_bloggs for example, and when the time comes, rename it, and then do the install of exchange? It will be a member server (as is the current server) in an NT4 domain, running NT4. There will of course be a BDC at the remote site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unable to add to contacts or Addressee books.
Could you perhaps word the question a bit move vaguely? There's a snowball's chance in hell someone might actually be able to figure out what the hell you a talking about now, and with just a bit more obfuscation you could prevent anyone on the planet from offering a meaningful response to your query. -- Chris Scharff, MVP MCSE EMS Sales Engineer MessageOne 512.652.4500 x-244 Shh.. I'm watchin the Chippendales. -- Jennifer Baker (1/2/2002) They're so cute in that episode when they try to steal all of the acorns, then end up knocking over the christmas tree on top of Donald Duck... -- Erik Sojka (1/2/2002) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jazzy144;yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2002 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to add to contacts or Addressee books. Have anyone ever run into this problem with users? There are users that can't add to contacts or addressee books. Using OutLook 200 and 2002. Thank you _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch 5.5 ost synch
I only know one thing that will induce a synch error at will. There are probably others. I'll share my recipe and maybe that will help. Recipe for indcing synch errors: 1. Set mailbox size limit low. 2. Have users fill mailboxes, including some meeting requests. 3. Have users attempt to process meeting requests, generating an unable to send message because they have run out of storage space. 4. Have users attempt to synch their calendars and mailboxes. Voila! There you have it - lots of synch failure messages. Temporary stupid fix. 1. Have users first clean out their mailboxes to something below the limit. 2. Have users Exit and Logoff (MAPI must be unloaded). 3. Have users restart their MAPI client (presumably Outlook). 4. Have users attempt to synch their calendars and mailboxes. Voila! It works. Real Fix - set a higher limit maybe . . . Anybody else got a recipe? -Original Message- From: Craig A. Mills [mailto:craigam;camnetwork.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 ost synch I have two Exch 5.5 sites where every user receives synch errors, usually to the inbox and sent folders. Its not at the client. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K: automatic address list creation
I can be a tool... --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K: automatic address list creation Given enough $ there's a tool to do everything. -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:usofwd;gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation Hi, is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name - Site - Department - Divison I can't find a way to do that automatically in E2K, I have to create each container separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? Regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error
Basicaly says just let the bad format thru Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error What did the patch do? - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error FYI, the problem was fixed with a patch on my firewall..thanks for the replies though. Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error Well like most Firewalls they lock everything and you have to punch holes in it. Relaying should be allowed to those that successfully Authenticate. Check your setting for same. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error I am running 5.5 SP4 and I have ESMTP turned on, I was wondering about the other settings noted below -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error If your running Exchange 2000 and I assuming this, you need the Firewall Software/Hardware to allow ESMTP protocol traffic for Messaging to flow. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error Can anyone tell me what to do here? I just installed a Symantec Velociraptor firewall. Here is the message my firewall is showing, (I removed the original email addresses to protect the innocent) smtpd Warning: Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=2844 from [207.114.164.37] tried to send to '[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt In my smpt protocol settings on the firewall I have the following choices: of which only ESMTP is checked: Enable ESMTP - Provides access to the Extended Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. ESMTP is enabled by default. When it is enabled, the other service extensions on this tab can be enabled. Enable AUTH (Authentication) - Allows client to send user name and password to authenticate with the server. Authentication is enabled by default. Note: SEF/SEVPN does not support authentication mechanisms that result in the connection being encrypted. Enable ATRN (Authenticated turn) - Allows an on-demand mail relay from the server to the client by turning the existing connection around. ATRN is disabled by default. Enable ETRN (Extended turn- Allows the client to access mail. In this case, the server is requested to initiate a separate connection to the client for the purpose of mail relay from server to the client. ETRN is disabled by default. Enable EXPN (Expansion) - Allows for the expansion of mailing lists. EXPN is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Enable VRFY (Verify) - Allows verification of mail addresses. VRFY is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Should I have any other of these options checked to allow these emails to pass thru? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Exch 5.5 ost synch
Post the errors. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-224131;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Craig A. Mills Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch 5.5 ost synch I have two Exch 5.5 sites where every user receives synch errors, usually to the inbox and sent folders. Its not at the client. Any suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Advice on infrastructure design
You'd like working here then! If a site has more than 10 people, we have to put in an Exchange server. If only I could convince them to put all that extra money into my bank account instead :-). -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: Friday, 11 October 2002 1:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design No. Move the mailboxes to your central site, and save the cost of 5 Exchange servers. I have had plenty of 20 person offices hitting Exchange across WAN links without issue. In fact, I have 2 offices going half way across Europe, with 30 users each, to the only office there that can support Exchange (from an admin standpoint). Personally, I think a server for less than about 40-50 users is insane. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Hi Very few to be honest, at our head office we have something like 30 users, then each site has around 10-15 Am I correct in assuming mailboxes need to be moved to our central server first, then the sites created, then the mailboxes moved back? Thanks Nik -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:roger.seielstad;inovis.com] Sent: 10 October 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Good point -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Advice on infrastructure design I agree, but am curious as too how many users at each site? Do you really need one at each location. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 7:40 AM Subject: RE: Advice on infrastructure design Switch to x.400 connectors. There is precious little difference, at the network level, between Site Connectors and intrasite communications - they both rely entirely on RPC connectivity, which frankly blows across unstable or tempermental WANs. Alternately (since you'd need to own Enterprise to use x.400 connectors), you could also use the IMS as your connector, but I find x.400 easier to use for connector purposes. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield - Exchange [mailto:exchangelist;partition.co.uk] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 6:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Advice on infrastructure design Dear All, I hope you will excuse me if this seems like an amateurish question to ask, but I think we need to revise our setup, and are not in a position to hire a consultant. Currently, we have 5 offices connected to each other via ADSL links, using Sonicwall routers and their VPN capabilities. Our Exchange Setup is 1 site with 5 servers. We've had the odd problem in the past when the ADSL links have gone down, and messages have been lost. Not often, but once or twice It was suggested to me here that we should configure each server as residing in a different site, and configure site connectors I now have an issue where one server experiences massive delays when delivering messages to other servers (8 hours in some cases). On closer inspection, I see lots of MTA errors regarding RPC communication. When running RPC Ping, it says it failed to bind to the other servers on all protocols If we are to revise our configuration, will it be best for me to move mailboxes from 1 server to what I call our central server which will be remaining in the site its in, then delete the old server, re-install exchange into a new site in the existing organisation, and move the mailboxes back? Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Changing Mail Servers
No, it is not safe to assume that. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Is it safe to assume that you are unable to move mailboxes from one Exchange server in one domain to another Exchange box in a different domain? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:curspice;pacbell.net] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers You need not do anything for that to work, but it works only for Outlook with MAPI, and only when you move mailboxes using the Admin or System Manager tools, not Exmerge. POP3, IMAP4 or OWA won't automatically update profiles. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Do I have to DO anything for that to work? It doesn't seem to work. Do I have to disable the old account? Should I reread Ed's method? My original server is using Associated Accounts to the new domain. -Original Message- From: Chris King [mailto:Cking;whitneyhawks.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers As long as the original server is still online it should tell the client that the mailbox is now homed on the other server, and the client's profile will be updated accordingly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-311248;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers The new server is on another domain. 2. Bring up a new Windows 2000 server in the same AD domain as the existing server. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:davida;vss.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers If you followed Ed's Method it will. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Really? I don't think 2000 will change the profile on the fly. -Original Message- From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:Dale.Edwards;AmericanTower.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers I think Exchange is intuitive enough to change the servername automagically, if you are talking about changing it in the profile for the User on their machines. At least Exchange 5.5 was intuitive enough to know that if I moved Users from Server A to Server B, the User did not have to do anything. The servername in the profile got changed on the fly. If I am way off the actual topic, I apologize. Gèoff... -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Just thought of this one. If you moved people from one server to another then you will most likely have to touch each workstation. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:07 PM Subject: RE: Changing Mail Servers Yes I can what? How should I change the name? -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Changing Mail Servers Yes you can. As long as all your workstations are the same. But you should have done it so it would have been transparent to the users. - Original Message - From: Vincent Avallone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 11:49 AM Subject: Changing Mail Servers Thanks to all your help, my new Exchange 2000 email server is up and running pretty smoothly so far. When it is time to go live, what are your suggestion on how to change the server name on my clients? I thought there may be a registry entry that I can use regini with and change it, but I haven't been able to find it yet. There is the option of asking users to do it themselves. I am trying to avoid visiting each user. Any ideas would be helpful. Thanks -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000
Maybe it didn't happen! Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 this is very elusive. I can't reproduce this *under normal cirumstances*, i.e. create a user account with mailbox, create another user account without a mailbox, create a group, mail-enabled it, add both user accounts to the group, send a test message to the group. The groups that do not work are built like this: - each customer has a separate OU - inside the customer OU there are all the user accounts and group accounts for the customer. - each customer has a global security group AllUsers@[customer.com] and every customer's user account is automatically added to the group. The group is mail-enabled. - Each customer has an account called Service (UserPrincipalName=Service@[customer.com]), Service is also a member of AllUsers@[customer.com] group. Service account does not have a mailbox. - Messages sent to AllUsers@[customer.com] get stuck in Awaiting Directory Lookup queue. - If I create a mailbox for Service, messages flow normally. If I delete the mailbox, messages get stuck again. We have a few thousand customers, so there are a few thousand groups called AllUsers@[customer.com], and each group has its own Service user as a member. I wonder if the categorizer runs out of steam trying to resolve the correct Service without a mailbox out of thousands. Although the UPN clearly states which one is which... -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 crap... I can't reproduce this behavior on my corporate Exchange 2000 environment. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 I just hope that when I call PSS, they would be able to escalate and fix it. We rely on global security groups that need to be mail-enabled, and our hosting architecture uses a windows account that's a member of these groups but is not mail-enabled. I do not want to mail-enable this account because we then would pay Exchange license fees for it to Microsoft (each customer has an account like that). -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:Kevinm;wlkmmas.org] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 Good job.. And thanks for sharing.. Simple solutions are often at the bottom of the list of things to try. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-98850;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 2:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I just discovered a bug in Exchange 2000 This has been a nagging issue for a long time. I have not been able to send mail to certain groups - messages would just get stuck in the Retry Queue Awaiting Directory Lookup. This was also coincidental with IIS memory leak. I can't believe how simple the cause of the problem is! The groups that experience problems are mail-enabled global security groups AND some members of the group are not mail-enabled. That's all. I have been looking at all other things trying to solve the problem. I thought that for some reason there was a duplication of an SMTP address somewhere (actually that used to be another bug in earlier version of Exchange 2000) or maybe the LegacyExchangeDN was screwed up... I can't believe it did not occur to me to check all the group's members to see if any of them were somehow different. Now we do have a reason for having such mixed groups for customer provisioning methods. Andrey Fyodorov Senior Exchange Administrator iNNERHOST http://www.innerhost.com P.S. please consider this bug officially claimed by Andrey Fyodorov, the founder of the Scientific Jiggle Method and the Scientific Poking Around method. :) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: 550 Relaying Denied
If they're sending using a POP or IMAP client using SMTP, then have them configure their SMTP clients to authenticate with their AD or NT account (format: domain\userID) and password. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Sean Brandt Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: 550 Relaying Denied I have an exchange server that has domain_a as it's default address. I have a number of users who have additional addresses of user@domain_b. They are getting a 550 Relaying Denied error when sending from their domain_b address. I'm new to Exchange admin. so I'm not sure where the setting would be to allow sending of emails with other domain names. Your help is much appreciated! Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL information
In the first (and only) line of the export file, list the attributes you want to export. You probably want: Display Name,Directory Name,Members if you're exporting distribution lists, and if you're exporting users, add the attribute Member Of (no quotes). You can just take the first line of any file you export and add the attributes you want to it, then export again. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: DL information Sorry if this is a repeat post, I first posted on the web and have not seen it yet. I need to gather DL information for 6 Exchange 5.5 Orgs and was wondering if anyone knows of a good tool. I ran the extract in the administrative console, but that only gives Alias, SMTP, and basic information. I am about to whip up a batch file that runs ONDL in the BORK to extract the members and numbers of members by plugging in the Aliases from the extract, but was wondering if anyone has a better solution. I am also supposed to get the owner of the DL, but I have not come up with an automated solution for that yet. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Ken Hatley, MCSE Messaging Consolidation VM/Pgr. 877.500.2511 Office 972.997.9261 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need help with550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error
I believe he said it fixed the problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error What did the patch do? - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 12:55 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error FYI, the problem was fixed with a patch on my firewall..thanks for the replies though. Thank You, Robert Williams Senior Network Administrator Raypak, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone - 805-278-5363 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 12:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error Well like most Firewalls they lock everything and you have to punch holes in it. Relaying should be allowed to those that successfully Authenticate. Check your setting for same. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:38 PM Subject: RE: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible re lay attempt error I am running 5.5 SP4 and I have ESMTP turned on, I was wondering about the other settings noted below -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:thlabse;hotmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error If your running Exchange 2000 and I assuming this, you need the Firewall Software/Hardware to allow ESMTP protocol traffic for Messaging to flow. - Original Message - From: Robert Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Need help with 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt error Can anyone tell me what to do here? I just installed a Symantec Velociraptor firewall. Here is the message my firewall is showing, (I removed the original email addresses to protect the innocent) smtpd Warning: Sender [EMAIL PROTECTED] SIZE=2844 from [207.114.164.37] tried to send to '[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTIFY=FAILURE,DELAY ORCPT=rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED]' - 550 5.7.1 Bad recipient format -- possible relay attempt In my smpt protocol settings on the firewall I have the following choices: of which only ESMTP is checked: Enable ESMTP - Provides access to the Extended Simple Mail Transfer Protocol. ESMTP is enabled by default. When it is enabled, the other service extensions on this tab can be enabled. Enable AUTH (Authentication) - Allows client to send user name and password to authenticate with the server. Authentication is enabled by default. Note: SEF/SEVPN does not support authentication mechanisms that result in the connection being encrypted. Enable ATRN (Authenticated turn) - Allows an on-demand mail relay from the server to the client by turning the existing connection around. ATRN is disabled by default. Enable ETRN (Extended turn- Allows the client to access mail. In this case, the server is requested to initiate a separate connection to the client for the purpose of mail relay from server to the client. ETRN is disabled by default. Enable EXPN (Expansion) - Allows for the expansion of mailing lists. EXPN is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Enable VRFY (Verify) - Allows verification of mail addresses. VRFY is disabled by default. Caution: Enabling this option exposes information about your internal network to untrusted sites and is therefore not recommended. Should I have any other of these options checked to allow these emails to pass thru? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Database Location
I disagree. Point anything else you want to the RAID 5 volume EXCEPT the information store transaction logs. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Database Location make sure you don't point anything else at the RAID5 volume. -Original Message- From: Vincent Avallone [mailto:avallone;ibiquity.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Database Location I am just about finished with setting up my new Exchange 2000 server on the new domain. I have created an 18igig partition for my logs and OS and a 36gig RAID 5 for my database. The only thing I have on the RAID 5 is the .edb and the .stm. As you can tell I am still learning. Is there anything else I need to point to the RAID 5 drive? Thanks for the patience. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Omtool
I installed and managed Omtool Fax Sr. with a 24-port Brooktrout T1 board. The hardware and software were trouble-free. I liked Fax Sr. because you could customize so many things. But it was a long time ago and the times and technologies have indeed changed. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Omtool Ha - thats funny. I too worked for Inacom/Vanstar and the account I was on (Alcoa) had a huge installed base of Fax Sr. Didn't really do much with it though. I do remember these funky 19kbs modems we had to use because Fax sr didn't like the 56k USRs we bought. The only site with a digital modem bank was the corporate HQ. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: automatic address list creation
Yeah, he obviously knows that from his question. Care to help with a way to automatically generate ALL of them? The only way I know of to do that would be to write a script. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-94760;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: automatic address list creation You can build them by using LDAP queries - Original Message - From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 3:48 AM Subject: E2K: automatic address list creation Hi, is there a way to create a hierarchal address list view similar to Exchange 5.5 Address Book views? I have a list of over 10,000 Contacts of our sister companies that we had viewed in Exchange 5.5 in view like: Company Name - Site - Department - Divison I can't find a way to do that automatically in E2K, I have to create each container separately. Is there a third party tool that can do that? Regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can't send attachment with mail
Oh, yes, let's automatically blame the server. And while we're at it, let's run the utilities willy-nilly and see if something changes. What OS are the workstations running? Does this happen with _all_ clients, or just the ones who are complaining? Has it ever worked? What changed? -Original Message- From: Niko [mailto:niko_n;mail.tel-aviv.gov.il] Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can't send attachment with mail Hi all, We are using Exchange 5.5 Server with Service Pack 4(NT Server 4.0 with Service pack 4) On Client end we are using Outlook 97, 2000 Now the problem is that we cant send attachment with mails. The error when we tried to send attachment is following: you don't have appropriate permission to perform this operation failed operation I try run ISINTEG -FIX -PRI(PUB) -TEST ALLTESTS and ESEUTIL /R but it is not resolve problem Thanks in advance Niko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
