RE: Keeping Outlook Profile settings while upgrading from NT4/X5.5 tonew W2K/E2K
They're in the registry. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Keeping Outlook Profile settings while upgrading from NT4/X5.5 to new W2K/E2K Upgrading a single NT4 Exchange 5.5 environment to a new W2K Exchange 2000 environment using a new AD Domain (1 server does it all in both environments) . Users are a mix of NT4, W2K and XP Pro workstations using Outlook 2000 or Outlook XP. Using Exmerge on 5.5 to create a .PST file for each user, then again on E2K to import those .PST files. Most of the users have highly customized Outlook bar settings. Any suggestions on how to keep these settings? I've tried the XP Files and Settings Transfer Wizard for the XP machines, but it would not recreate the Outlook shortcuts (I guess because it's a different server even though the shortcuts point to the same information). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Managing Ex5.5 Mailboxes from E2K
Use Exchange 5.5 Administrator to administer Exchange 5.5 and Active Directory Users and Computer with the Exchange System Tools added on to manager Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phillips, Alan Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Patterson, Norman Subject: Managing Ex5.5 Mailboxes from E2K We have an Exchange 2000 SP3 setup with some Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers in it. With UsersComputers on the AD side, users with Exchange 5.5 mailboxes show the Exchange-related tabs; we can do things like changing storage limits and have the ADC replicate these into the Exchange 5.5 directory. If we use UC's Exchange Tasks to try to delete an Exchange 5.5 mailbox, though, it doesn't manage to do it - the AD entries for the mailbox (HomeMDB attribute and so on) get cleared; nothing changes on the Exchange 5.5 side after the next ADC replication; and on the replication after that the ADC puts the Exchange 5.5 details back in to AD and we're back where we started. I surmise this is because we are allowed to manage properties on a downlevel mailbox, but deletion of a mailbox is not supported across the ADC. Am I right, or have we got our ADC misconfigured? (The aim of the exercise is to have our ADSI tools manage/delete mailboxes without regard to where they might be while we're in the process of moving mailboxes to E2K) Thanks Alan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schema Update Questions
Does the account you're using have Exchange permissions? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed. What I am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks. I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools are installed. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the next week. It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months. I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD. We've run /forestprep and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab. Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its a permission issue with the account used for the updates? If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running /forestprep and /domainprep again? Dot Harris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Managing Ex5.5 Mailboxes from E2K
Use Exchange 5.5 Administrator to administer Exchange 5.5 and Active Directory Users and Computer with the Exchange System Tools added on to manager Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phillips, Alan Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Patterson, Norman Subject: Managing Ex5.5 Mailboxes from E2K We have an Exchange 2000 SP3 setup with some Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers in it. With UsersComputers on the AD side, users with Exchange 5.5 mailboxes show the Exchange-related tabs; we can do things like changing storage limits and have the ADC replicate these into the Exchange 5.5 directory. If we use UC's Exchange Tasks to try to delete an Exchange 5.5 mailbox, though, it doesn't manage to do it - the AD entries for the mailbox (HomeMDB attribute and so on) get cleared; nothing changes on the Exchange 5.5 side after the next ADC replication; and on the replication after that the ADC puts the Exchange 5.5 details back in to AD and we're back where we started. I surmise this is because we are allowed to manage properties on a downlevel mailbox, but deletion of a mailbox is not supported across the ADC. Am I right, or have we got our ADC misconfigured? (The aim of the exercise is to have our ADSI tools manage/delete mailboxes without regard to where they might be while we're in the process of moving mailboxes to E2K) Thanks Alan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Keeping Outlook Profile settings while upgrading from NT4/X5.5 tonew W2K/E2K
They're in the registry. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Keeping Outlook Profile settings while upgrading from NT4/X5.5 to new W2K/E2K Upgrading a single NT4 Exchange 5.5 environment to a new W2K Exchange 2000 environment using a new AD Domain (1 server does it all in both environments) . Users are a mix of NT4, W2K and XP Pro workstations using Outlook 2000 or Outlook XP. Using Exmerge on 5.5 to create a .PST file for each user, then again on E2K to import those .PST files. Most of the users have highly customized Outlook bar settings. Any suggestions on how to keep these settings? I've tried the XP Files and Settings Transfer Wizard for the XP machines, but it would not recreate the Outlook shortcuts (I guess because it's a different server even though the shortcuts point to the same information). _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2k/Exchange 5.5 Mixed Mode problem
Does the OU in which you've created the new users have a CA that replicates it back to Exchange 5.5? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2k/Exchange 5.5 Mixed Mode problem Windows 2000 SP3 Exchange 5.5 SP4 Exchange 2k SP3 Exchange Site A has 3 Exchange 5.5 Servers Exchange Site B has 2 Exchange 5.5 Servers Exchange Site C has 1 Exchange 5.5 Server We have 3 AD Sites that correspond exactly to our 3 Exchange 5.5 Sites. We have set up our ADC and all of our connectors Two-Way between AD and Exchange 5.5. All Exchange 5.5 information has replicated into our AD environment no problem. Any changes I made in Exchange 5.5 or AD were replicated no problem. So we installed our first Exchange Server in Site B and created our first Exchange 2k mailbox. I can open mailbox up and send emails to exchange 5.5 users no problem but...the existence of the mailbox does not replicate to the exchange 5.5 directory for some reason. Exchange 5.5 doesn't even know it exists. So none of my Exchange 5.5 users can see this exchange 2k mailbox. Any ideas what I am doing wrong here? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schema Update Questions
Does the account you're using have Exchange permissions? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed. What I am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks. I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools are installed. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the next week. It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months. I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD. We've run /forestprep and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab. Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its a permission issue with the account used for the updates? If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running /forestprep and /domainprep again? Dot Harris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Managing Ex5.5 Mailboxes from E2K
Use Exchange 5.5 Administrator to administer Exchange 5.5 and Active Directory Users and Computer with the Exchange System Tools added on to manager Exchange 2000. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Phillips, Alan Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Patterson, Norman Subject: Managing Ex5.5 Mailboxes from E2K We have an Exchange 2000 SP3 setup with some Exchange 5.5 SP4 servers in it. With UsersComputers on the AD side, users with Exchange 5.5 mailboxes show the Exchange-related tabs; we can do things like changing storage limits and have the ADC replicate these into the Exchange 5.5 directory. If we use UC's Exchange Tasks to try to delete an Exchange 5.5 mailbox, though, it doesn't manage to do it - the AD entries for the mailbox (HomeMDB attribute and so on) get cleared; nothing changes on the Exchange 5.5 side after the next ADC replication; and on the replication after that the ADC puts the Exchange 5.5 details back in to AD and we're back where we started. I surmise this is because we are allowed to manage properties on a downlevel mailbox, but deletion of a mailbox is not supported across the ADC. Am I right, or have we got our ADC misconfigured? (The aim of the exercise is to have our ADSI tools manage/delete mailboxes without regard to where they might be while we're in the process of moving mailboxes to E2K) Thanks Alan _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Have you scheduled a block of time for it to run? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Are there any command line switches that I can use to run the online defrag in Exchange 5.5? My online defrag isn't running and if I can just force it to run maybe from a command line prompt and not within Exchange Admin, that would great. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin, LLP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schema Update Questions
Yes it does. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions Does the account you're using have Exchange permissions? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed. What I am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks. I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools are installed. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the next week. It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months. I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD. We've run /forestprep and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab. Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its a permission issue with the account used for the updates? If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running /forestprep and /domainprep again? Dot Harris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Disable EX2k RUS per User?
Hi, I need to disable the Recipient Update Service for most users, i.e. get the tick box 'Automatically update e-mail addresses based on recipient policy' unchecked in AD User Properties/Email addresses. Does anyone know which AD property controls this feature or has doe this via code/scripting? T.I.A. Paul Christopher Admin Desktop Service Manager Management Systems Division University College London Gower St London WC1E 6BT _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Schema Update Questions
Dot - Make sure you are looking at the user properties in AD Users and Computers, not at the users profiles on an NT box. Also make sure that the Advanced Features are selected. If there was a permissions issue with the account you used for the schema update, it would have barked at you and the update would have failed. Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions Yes it does. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions Does the account you're using have Exchange permissions? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 12:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions The computer I'm using has the Exchange Management tools installed. What I am not seeing when creating a user, is a drop-down to select Exchange Tasks. I see that the ADC has started but nothing else -- no errors, nothing. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Schema Update Questions These tabs will only appear on a machine where the Exchange management tools are installed. -Original Message- From: Harris, Dot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 2:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions We're planning to bring up an Exchange 2000 server in our environment in the next week. It will coexist with our Exchange 5.5 server for a few months. I used the ADC from Exchange Sp3 CD. We've run /forestprep and /domainprep and have created a two-way connection agreement, but I have not seen anything relating to Exchange reflected in the user's profiles, not even the Exchange features tab. Is there a way to verify the schema updates, I'm thinking its a permission issue with the account used for the updates? If that is the case, is there any gotcha's in running /forestprep and /domainprep again? Dot Harris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Disable EX2k RUS per User?
I believe it to be the 'msExchPoliciesIncluded' attribute. I think a zero value means the check box is not selected, but you'll see that when it is activated, it has the IDs of the policies included. Don't forget to try on a test system first! Neil -Original Message- From: Paul X. Christopher (UCL-MSD) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 22 November 2002 12:20 Posted To: Swynk Exchange List Conversation: Disable EX2k RUS per User? Subject: Disable EX2k RUS per User? Hi, I need to disable the Recipient Update Service for most users, i.e. get the tick box 'Automatically update e-mail addresses based on recipient policy' unchecked in AD User Properties/Email addresses. Does anyone know which AD property controls this feature or has doe this via code/scripting? T.I.A. Paul Christopher Admin Desktop Service Manager Management Systems Division University College London Gower St London WC1E 6BT _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202-360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Size of mailbox
I realize it is all a best guess. What number does Exchange use to determine if a person is over or near the mailbox size limit as set in System Manager. Is it the number I see in System Manager or some other number? Jim -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Size of mailbox Right. Remember, none of the numbers can be valid because there is no such thing as a physical mailbox. They are views, and as such, any size attributed to them is a theoretical number obtained by summing a bunch of stuff. Also, remember that notes and attachments associated with calendar objects (i.e. appointments) get counted. But I'll bet lots of stuff doesn't like holidays and such, but hey, that's a wild guess. Also, if you stop and think about it, the security attributes of any one object in Exchange have to be almost infinitely extensible, to allow for all of the changing view activity. I suspect that those attributes are constantly causing objects to change size, but that those sizes don't get updated very often within a view. If you stop and think about it, if there are three people on the same store, and A, sends B a note, and then B forwards it to C, it should get a few bytes larger in A's view assuming that it is still in Sent Items. But I'll bet that step is skipped, or massively deferred, which is going to make the size data wrong for most items in most views most of the time. People can have lots of stuff linked that way. I've never seen the exact formula for what gets added and what doesn't, but I'll bet Sue knows, if you send her a note at Slipstick. If she doesn't know, then no-one does. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 8:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Size of mailbox Jim, Regardless of the the trend I see for all other users, I would have a problem believing either set of numbers. Here's why: The first set of numbers (if that is actually kilobytes and not bytes) would indicate that there SHOULD be a total of ~336mb in the first mailbox. Obviously, there isn't...according to your report. The second set of numbers would indicate that there should be a total of ~813mb in the second mailbox. Again, the numbers still don't add up. The only way I can think of that your second set of numbers would be accurate, is that you have some 3rd party piece of software that actually saves all attachments off to a member server and then stores a pointer with the message to the actual location of the attachment, which is screwing up your reports. But look at your second set of numbers. The TOTAL for the entire mailbox is still smaller than just the messages by themselves, without even adding in the attachment numbers. I think I'd go back to square one or go back and look at the configuration of your reporting software, in order to make sure you don't have it grabbing data for the mailbox reports that doesn't belong to the mailbox. -Original Message- From: James Liddil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Size of mailbox That helps but I still have some questions. I'll try to be more clear. When I look in the Exchange System Manager at an account does or does that not give one at least a relatively true size for that persons mailstore size? Bindview tells me they simply use the numbers provided by Exchange to get the report figures. This report gave me a mailstore number size equivalent to that I saw in the System Manager. (~3.4 meg this morning). All my confusion stems from the following. I run a report in Bindview and the query terms have the following definition: -Message Size: This field contains the size (in k) of the Message, including attachments -Attachment Total Size: This field lists the total size of all attachments (bytes) to the message -Total Mailbox Size: This field contains the total size of all messages (k). So I get: Message Size: 268356 k Attachment Total Size: 75998 k Total Mailbox size: 3341 k (this number matches what I see in System Manager) For another person I get Message Size: 429069 Attachment Total Size: 403223 k Total Mailbox size: 425915 k What are some reasons for mine having such a difference between message size and total mailbox size? The data for the second person matches the trend I see for all other users. What is the most reliable number? And which number does exchange use to determine what a person mailbox size is and whether they are near or over limit? And why am I asking all this? Our message store total is close to 6 gigs for a company of 20 people. So then I decide to use
RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?
Hello? He quoted the exact same paragraph from eventID.net in his original post. He indicated it didn't apply and asked for additional insight. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/21/2002 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=209source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? Here's the message I'm getting: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 209 Date: 11/13/2002 Time: 14:16:46 User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Global domain identifier (Country, ADMD, PRMD) in first Trace Information of message C=us;A= ;P=rst;L=EXCHANGE0211131916WS5VB3DM does not match MTSID value. [MTA XFER-IN 11 40] (12) According to EventID.NET: This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. Now, I'm not entirely sure if this applies. I'm working on a 5.5 Migration to 2000, bringing in new hardware and changing NT4 to w2k domains. 5.5 server is NT4 in domain RST, E2k is in the new domain but has been added to the original ORG. Can anyone offer insight? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Have an interesting problem. Currently have our exchange server locked down so that no one can route mail from outside the internal network. Now we are setting up remote monitoring PC's that are using the internet to send alerts. But obviously that will not work since they are outside the internal network. Inputting IP info for each machine is not desired as there are over 300 machines that will be doing this and their addresses may change. Looking for a means that these computers can authenticate to the server. This is something that can be inserted into the code of the software sending alerts. But I am not seeing a sure fire way to accomplish this. So to sum it up, exchange server is locked down so no system outside the internal network can route mail. Need to find a way that certain systems that are outside the internal network can route mail thru our server using some sort or authentication that is hard coded into our software. Or any other means that anyone can think of. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Why not just use Blat, postie etc on the remote machines? - Original Message - From: Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:32 AM Subject: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5 Have an interesting problem. Currently have our exchange server locked down so that no one can route mail from outside the internal network. Now we are setting up remote monitoring PC's that are using the internet to send alerts. But obviously that will not work since they are outside the internal network. Inputting IP info for each machine is not desired as there are over 300 machines that will be doing this and their addresses may change. Looking for a means that these computers can authenticate to the server. This is something that can be inserted into the code of the software sending alerts. But I am not seeing a sure fire way to accomplish this. So to sum it up, exchange server is locked down so no system outside the internal network can route mail. Need to find a way that certain systems that are outside the internal network can route mail thru our server using some sort or authentication that is hard coded into our software. Or any other means that anyone can think of. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
A few ways I can think of: 1. On the same page where one can put in allowed IP addresses you can add only clients that authenticate. This, however, would require any POP/IMAP clients using these servers to have to change their settings. 2. If it is a static set of addresses that are otherwise external to your org add the domain(s) of those addresses to your routing tab as inbound and have CRs that reroute to the address. 3. If the external machines have IPs that all reside in the same subnet, one that you do not control, have the person who controls that subnet (who would most likely by your ISP and who would likely have an SMTP server) if they can route through his box. I suppose I could come up with some more solutions if I knew the details of what these boxes are doing, who they are sending to, etc. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5 Have an interesting problem. Currently have our exchange server locked down so that no one can route mail from outside the internal network. Now we are setting up remote monitoring PC's that are using the internet to send alerts. But obviously that will not work since they are outside the internal network. Inputting IP info for each machine is not desired as there are over 300 machines that will be doing this and their addresses may change. Looking for a means that these computers can authenticate to the server. This is something that can be inserted into the code of the software sending alerts. But I am not seeing a sure fire way to accomplish this. So to sum it up, exchange server is locked down so no system outside the internal network can route mail. Need to find a way that certain systems that are outside the internal network can route mail thru our server using some sort or authentication that is hard coded into our software. Or any other means that anyone can think of. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Have the remote monitoring machines utilize SMTP AUTH or put a basic SMTP server on the machines doing the monitoring so they can route mail on their own. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Have an interesting problem. Currently have our exchange server locked down so that no one can route mail from outside the internal network. Now we are setting up remote monitoring PC's that are using the internet to send alerts. But obviously that will not work since they are outside the internal network. Inputting IP info for each machine is not desired as there are over 300 machines that will be doing this and their addresses may change. Looking for a means that these computers can authenticate to the server. This is something that can be inserted into the code of the software sending alerts. But I am not seeing a sure fire way to accomplish this. So to sum it up, exchange server is locked down so no system outside the internal network can route mail. Need to find a way that certain systems that are outside the internal network can route mail thru our server using some sort or authentication that is hard coded into our software. Or any other means that anyone can think of. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the e-mail alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are on various other networks around the country to be able to relay thru our mail server without being an open relay. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
That doesn't appear to tell Tony anything more than he already stated he knew. Perhaps you could explain to him the differences between a -1018 error and a -1019 error? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source:ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Oversnipped so I have no idea what you are responding to. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the e-mail alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are on various other networks around the country to be able to relay thru our mail server without being an open relay. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
I think you'll have to figure out how to make these machines authenticate, or use a VPN. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jerry J. Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5 We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the e-mail alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are on various other networks around the country to be able to relay thru our mail server without being an open relay. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This was to the first response about using Blat from Andy. We have full capabilities to send the e-mails. I put the smpt server on the local machine out and the programmers do not think that will be feasible due to the many variables involved at each site. (their words exactly) So it looks like I am stuck with trying to resolve this on the exchange server with something that they can hard code into our remote software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Oversnipped again, but SMTP AUTH seems to meet the desired objective of the original query. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This was to the first response about using Blat from Andy. We have full capabilities to send the e-mails. I put the smpt server on the local machine out and the programmers do not think that will be feasible due to the many variables involved at each site. (their words exactly) So it looks like I am stuck with trying to resolve this on the exchange server with something that they can hard code into our remote software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
I've used both Palm Based, Palm VIIx, Palm i705, Kyocera 6135 and Pocket PC 2002 to access wireless email. I have not used BlackBerry yet although I have heard good things about it. So far, I really like the Kyocera model which feels like a phone, but it's a Palm with Wireless capability. It also has 14.4Kbps for now, but they are coming out with the new model 7135 which may have up to 56kbps with color screen. On the backend, I use software called ThinAirApps Enterprise server to allow Palm based devices to access email, calendar, contacts and tasks. ThinAirApps was purchased by Palm last year I believe. MS MIS requires AD so if you don't AD, it's out of the question for now. My two cents... Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Pennell, Ronald B. Subject: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for accessing user mailboxes? Our company is starting to research use of PDA's. So far I have done some research on the BlackBerry site. Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2. Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's Thanks in advance Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
We are looking at implementing MS MIS. Has anybody done it? Any good or bad experiences to share? I would love some feedback on it. - Matthew Bailey - -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes snip MS MIS requires AD so if you don't AD, it's out of the question for now. My two cents... Brian snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Message I just posted was actually in response to Ed Crowley I forgot to post his message. Sorry Have you scheduled a block of time for it to run? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Are there any command line switches that I can use to run the online defrag in Exchange 5.5? My online defrag isn't running and if I can just force it to run maybe from a command line prompt and not within Exchange Admin, that would great. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin, LLP _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Thanks Chris, I do believe that it exactly what I am needing to do. Now I have never touched it before so if I set this up on my exchange server and they hard code the account and password into the software, how will that affect internal users using Outlook? I am assuming that they will need to have this account and password entered into they outlook profile somewhere. I just do not want to put out a change and bring our e-mailing to a halt. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Dell Axim for $174. http://slickdeals.net/#p2797 I was sending email via OWA with it at the handson lab at Comdex. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian Ko Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions I've used both Palm Based, Palm VIIx, Palm i705, Kyocera 6135 and Pocket PC 2002 to access wireless email. I have not used BlackBerry yet although I have heard good things about it. So far, I really like the Kyocera model which feels like a phone, but it's a Palm with Wireless capability. It also has 14.4Kbps for now, but they are coming out with the new model 7135 which may have up to 56kbps with color screen. On the backend, I use software called ThinAirApps Enterprise server to allow Palm based devices to access email, calendar, contacts and tasks. ThinAirApps was purchased by Palm last year I believe. MS MIS requires AD so if you don't AD, it's out of the question for now. My two cents... Brian -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Pennell, Ronald B. Subject: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes Has anyone had any experiences with using PDA's for accessing user mailboxes? Our company is starting to research use of PDA's. So far I have done some research on the BlackBerry site. Any recommendations as to server software for E2K SP2. Any hardware recommendations for the PDA's Thanks in advance Ron Pennell [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature
Speaking from experience, if you happen to build a computer room, don't let them build it on a wall with lots of windows. It gets hard to maintain 63 degrees in july. :( -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Indeed. The latter does become an issue, esp. in a place like Las Vegas in July. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cool enough that your equipment doesn't burn up. Not so cool that you drive your electric bill up unnecessarily. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT-Computer Room Temperature What is a desirable computer room temperature? Ours is currently at: 69 Degree Fahrenheit 45 Percent Relative Humidity Is this to hot? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clustering Exchange
Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Not sure how your environment is configured, but in mine it doesn't effect internal users at all. None of my internal users use SMTP... Well, there is the Mac guy, but his client is already configured to use SMTP AUTH with his own NT credentials. Adding one or one hundred more user accounts wouldn't effect his ability to relay though. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Thanks Chris, I do believe that it exactly what I am needing to do. Now I have never touched it before so if I set this up on my exchange server and they hard code the account and password into the software, how will that affect internal users using Outlook? I am assuming that they will need to have this account and password entered into they outlook profile somewhere. I just do not want to put out a change and bring our e-mailing to a halt. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1018source= http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1019source= Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That doesn't appear to tell Tony anything more than he already stated he knew. Perhaps you could explain to him the differences between a -1018 error and a -1019 error? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source:ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Probably nothing needs to be done. You don't see a completion event that tells you the amount of white space? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Karon Miller Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature
Not to mention that it's kind of a waste of windows since computers can't see. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Speaking from experience, if you happen to build a computer room, don't let them build it on a wall with lots of windows. It gets hard to maintain 63 degrees in july. :( -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Indeed. The latter does become an issue, esp. in a place like Las Vegas in July. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cool enough that your equipment doesn't burn up. Not so cool that you drive your electric bill up unnecessarily. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT-Computer Room Temperature What is a desirable computer room temperature? Ours is currently at: 69 Degree Fahrenheit 45 Percent Relative Humidity Is this to hot? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of the Information Store during our backups. We haven't gotten a good backup in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors. We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile. I have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing it offline? Thanks, Karon Miller Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
Don't do it. Been there done it you'll be sorry. Search the archives for cluster. We are moving away from a cluster and using hot spare server and booting off the SAN for redundancy. Brian -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Brick level backup errors are between you and your god; you should be sharing them with your priest, not a technical list. Do real, full backups run successfully? And if not, what /specifically/ is the error message associated with their failure. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of the Information Store during our backups. We haven't gotten a good backup in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors. We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile. I have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing it offline? Thanks, Karon Miller Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish
That's not the error. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=8206source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Clemens, Rick Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 17:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID: 8206 MSExchangeFBPublish Anybody else seeing this error in their Exchange 2k/Exch 5.5 mixed environments? Can't find anything in technet or eventid! The store is running and the databases are mounted and everything seems to be working finemail is flowing no problem...so why the error? Event Type: Error Event Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event Category: General Event ID: 8206 Date: 11/20/2002 Time: 4:06:34 PM User: N/A Computer: SRVEXBNT01 Description: Unable to prepare message table for polling thread processing on virtual machine SRVEXBNT01. The error number is 0x80004005. Make sure Microsoft Exchange Store is running. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentredirect.asp. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
Insufficient data. -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
Oh Boy (Time to get on my soap box)... Reasons not to have an exchange cluster: Clustering is generally expensive Clustering is more complex than two servers Front end\ Back end configurations are more complicated Exchange cluster nodes cannot be domain controllers Exchange cluster nodes cannot be global catalog servers Clusters cannot support the SRS service Clustering will not save you in the event of a hardware failure leading to a -1018 error and corrupting your mailbox store. Reasons to cluster exchange: Looks good on your resume Trust me... I have a cluster. Exchange 2000 is complex enough. Why would you want to introduce a cluster and complicate your environment even more? (Off soap box) HTH Russell Friends don't let friends cluster exchange -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ResolveP2 and multiple SMTP addresses
I am having trouble with my Exchange 5.5 single-server environment, and you guys are the smartest bunch I know... I have a user who has multiple SMTP addresses on his mailbox. I want to have Outlook 2000 rules fire based on those different addresses. In other words, if he has two addresses (lets call them [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I want to sort them into sub folders based on which address the message was sent to. In the past (years past, exchange 4 or 5, if I remember correctly) I simply set the ResolveP2 registry entry on the exchange server to 0, and it left the addresses alone, and I could sort to my hearts content. But now that is not working. I have looked at Q174755 - XFOR: ResolveP2 Registry Setting Expanded in Exchange 5.5. But it clearly states that if I set it to 0 it will not resolve any P2. But it still is. I was going to try some of the combinations mentioned in that article to see how it reacts, but thought I'd ask for advice first. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ResolveP2 and multiple SMTP addresses
http://www.rmcons.com/html/RegistryValues/Services/MSExchangeIMC/Parameters/ RerouteViaStore.htm -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am having trouble with my Exchange 5.5 single-server environment, and you guys are the smartest bunch I know... I have a user who has multiple SMTP addresses on his mailbox. I want to have Outlook 2000 rules fire based on those different addresses. In other words, if he has two addresses (lets call them [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I want to sort them into sub folders based on which address the message was sent to. In the past (years past, exchange 4 or 5, if I remember correctly) I simply set the ResolveP2 registry entry on the exchange server to 0, and it left the addresses alone, and I could sort to my hearts content. But now that is not working. I have looked at Q174755 - XFOR: ResolveP2 Registry Setting Expanded in Exchange 5.5. But it clearly states that if I set it to 0 it will not resolve any P2. But it still is. I was going to try some of the combinations mentioned in that article to see how it reacts, but thought I'd ask for advice first. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
If server downtime is impossible to arrange with your business, an alternative to an offline defrag or a repair would be to move all mailboxes to another server, shut down the IS, delete everything in mdbdata and then restart the IS with a clean blank priv.edb to which you can move the mailboxes back. This has the advantage that users are only affected whilst their mailbox data is actually being moved. I realise it sounds drastic but at least you are starting with a clean sheet and the move process will help flush out the corrupted mailboxes. You stand a better chance of not losing data than you would with Isinteg or eseutil. Mark n.b. you do lose deleted item retention when you move a mailbox -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 November 2002 15:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of the Information Store during our backups. We haven't gotten a good backup in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors. We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile. I have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing it offline? Thanks, Karon Miller Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] BBCi at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Doesn't your internal network accept internet mail in some way? How do people address mail to your company? 1. Many ISPs allow SMTP AUTH'ed mail from outside, you could have your monitor machines send mail to your ISP's SMTP AUTH server. 2. You could set up your own SMTP relay that only relays to your Exchange server AND only if AUTH is valid and then allow exchange to accept mail from this relay. -Kevin -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:08 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5 Subject: RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5 My apologies. Had to walk away before sending message. This was to the first response about using Blat from Andy. We have full capabilities to send the e-mails. I put the smpt server on the local machine out and the programmers do not think that will be feasible due to the many variables involved at each site. (their words exactly) So it looks like I am stuck with trying to resolve this on the exchange server with something that they can hard code into our remote software. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
To answer your reasons not to 1. Already have hardware. Higher ups, didn't mind spending money. 2. Thinking about N plus 1 3. True 4. No reason why I would want my server to be a Domain Controller 5. No reason why I would want my server to be a Global Catalogue Server 6. Have another machine with the srs, and only need it while 2000 and 5.5 are co-existing. 7. True. The reason my company would like a cluster, to have the most available uptime as possible. So if a server does happen to go down, we wouldn't have much downtime, as if we had to fix a standalone server. -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Clustering Exchange Oh Boy (Time to get on my soap box)... Reasons not to have an exchange cluster: Clustering is generally expensive Clustering is more complex than two servers Front end\ Back end configurations are more complicated Exchange cluster nodes cannot be domain controllers Exchange cluster nodes cannot be global catalog servers Clusters cannot support the SRS service Clustering will not save you in the event of a hardware failure leading to a -1018 error and corrupting your mailbox store. Reasons to cluster exchange: Looks good on your resume Trust me... I have a cluster. Exchange 2000 is complex enough. Why would you want to introduce a cluster and complicate your environment even more? (Off soap box) HTH Russell Friends don't let friends cluster exchange -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Clustering Exchange
I think the general opinion on this list is don't do clusters. I am currently working to implement a cluster and it does add an additional level of difficulty. In my opinion, if you are going to use a cluster, an N+1 senario does give you the cluster technology with less hardware expense. It does seem to an an additional layer of complexity when you are initially setting up the cluster. Dennis -Original Message- From: Callan, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clustering Exchange Okay, we have been beating our heads around looking for a cluster option that will work for us, obviously Active/Active was shot down, because of the memory fragmentation, even though initially MS told us it could be done, for the meantime we are looking to just go Active/Passive, I was wondering though what the general consensus on going N+1 is. We are going to explore the possibility to go to this, but I wanted to get some opinions on it first. Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Another thought: Set up an internal box with a SMTP daemon. Run it on a port diff. from 25 (12345 or something equally unlikely). On your firewall map all inbound requests for port 12345 to the IP of that internal box. As an added measure use AUTH just in case some wiseguy finds the port on your border. -Original Message- From: Jerry J. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5 We do not need an application on the remote machines for sending the e-mail alerts. Looking for a means of allowing these machines that are on various other networks around the country to be able to relay thru our mail server without being an open relay. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Ah... More info that would have been helpful upfront. On a Saturday... Install another Exchange box. Move the mailboxes to it. Toast the old priv.edb. Move the mailboxes back. Deinstall the temp Exchange box. -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Open file errors? What are you using to do backup? -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of the Information Store during our backups. We haven't gotten a good backup in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors. We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile. I have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing it offline? Thanks, Karon Miller Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ResolveP2 and multiple SMTP addresses
You rock. Changing this back to 0 worked fine. Still testing with my remote clients, but I am optimistic. Thanks again. Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ResolveP2 and multiple SMTP addresses http://www.rmcons.com/html/RegistryValues/Services/MSExchangeIMC/Parameters/ RerouteViaStore.htm -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am having trouble with my Exchange 5.5 single-server environment, and you guys are the smartest bunch I know... I have a user who has multiple SMTP addresses on his mailbox. I want to have Outlook 2000 rules fire based on those different addresses. In other words, if he has two addresses (lets call them [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I want to sort them into sub folders based on which address the message was sent to. In the past (years past, exchange 4 or 5, if I remember correctly) I simply set the ResolveP2 registry entry on the exchange server to 0, and it left the addresses alone, and I could sort to my hearts content. But now that is not working. I have looked at Q174755 - XFOR: ResolveP2 Registry Setting Expanded in Exchange 5.5. But it clearly states that if I set it to 0 it will not resolve any P2. But it still is. I was going to try some of the combinations mentioned in that article to see how it reacts, but thought I'd ask for advice first. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: ResolveP2 and multiple SMTP addresses
No problem. I encountered that issue on a production a couple of years ago. -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions You rock. Changing this back to 0 worked fine. Still testing with my remote clients, but I am optimistic. Thanks again. Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: ResolveP2 and multiple SMTP addresses http://www.rmcons.com/html/RegistryValues/Services/MSExchangeI MC/Parameters/ RerouteViaStore.htm -Original Message- From: Sullivan, Glenn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am having trouble with my Exchange 5.5 single-server environment, and you guys are the smartest bunch I know... I have a user who has multiple SMTP addresses on his mailbox. I want to have Outlook 2000 rules fire based on those different addresses. In other words, if he has two addresses (lets call them [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED]) I want to sort them into sub folders based on which address the message was sent to. In the past (years past, exchange 4 or 5, if I remember correctly) I simply set the ResolveP2 registry entry on the exchange server to 0, and it left the addresses alone, and I could sort to my hearts content. But now that is not working. I have looked at Q174755 - XFOR: ResolveP2 Registry Setting Expanded in Exchange 5.5. But it clearly states that if I set it to 0 it will not resolve any P2. But it still is. I was going to try some of the combinations mentioned in that article to see how it reacts, but thought I'd ask for advice first. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: Absolute file protection
Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
Veritas Backup Exec 8.6. and NO we're not using the Open File Agent because that doesn't work. And yes, we're doing BLBs because my hands are tied on changing this policy. I don't think my problem now is related to doing BLBs its that we can't get a good online defrag to run possibly due to database corruption. We may have to do some offline defrags but we're hoping we can fix this online. Thanks, Karon Open file errors? What are you using to do backup? -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of the Information Store during our backups. We haven't gotten a good backup in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors. We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile. I have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing it offline? Thanks, Karon Miller Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Absolute file protection
Don't ya love that Texas Sig My port's bigger than your port! Walt -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: Absolute file protection Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Absolute file protection
Is a big port really something to be bragging about :) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Walt Brannon Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Absolute file protection Don't ya love that Texas Sig My port's bigger than your port! Walt -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: Absolute file protection Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Absolute file protection
Yes, you missed an option: asking on a list that is dedicated to such issues. This one is for Exchange. - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:30 AM Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public folders inaccesible
I got to ESM and right click public folders and get a dialog box that says: The Token supplied to the function is invalid ID no. 80090308 Exchange System Manager So it looks like this is due to URLScan denying .com extensions. 11-22-2002 - 11:34:18] Client at 192.168.70.10: URL contains extension '.com', which is disallowed. Request will be rejected. Site Instance='1', Raw URL='/ExAdmin/Admin/phytoceutica.com/Public%20Folders/NON_IPM_SUBTREE/' For OWA the configuration is to deny .com extensions. So besides allowing .com is there another way around this? Jim Liddil _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Absolute file protection
Why don't you guys take your big ports offline -Original Message- From: Walt Brannon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Absolute file protection Don't ya love that Texas Sig My port's bigger than your port! Walt -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:30 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: Absolute file protection Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature
Thanks. I usually build them with lots of Linux. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Speaking from experience, if you happen to build a computer room, don't let them build it on a wall with lots of windows. It gets hard to maintain 63 degrees in july. :( -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Indeed. The latter does become an issue, esp. in a place like Las Vegas in July. William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag?
As I said in an earlier post, the quickest way out of this would likely be to move the mailboxes to another server, delete the priv on this one and move them back. - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Veritas Backup Exec 8.6. and NO we're not using the Open File Agent because that doesn't work. And yes, we're doing BLBs because my hands are tied on changing this policy. I don't think my problem now is related to doing BLBs its that we can't get a good online defrag to run possibly due to database corruption. We may have to do some offline defrags but we're hoping we can fix this online. Thanks, Karon Open file errors? What are you using to do backup? -Original Message- From: Karon Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? The reason we're trying to run it is because it hasn't ran successfully in a few months now and we're getting TONS of open file errors at the top of the Information Store during our backups. We haven't gotten a good backup in two weeks. Regardless of how we're backing up we're getting errors. We're thinking it's because it hasn't done an online defrag in awhile. I have never used ISINTEG does it require shutting down the services and doing it offline? Thanks, Karon Miller Online defrag will not fix any corruption. You have to use Isinteg for that. Make a backup and run it on test setup to see if you have any errors. Besides the online terminating very quickly with no errors in the event log do you see any other errors during the day? - Original Message - From: Karon Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: Any command line switches to run Online defrag? Well, it doesn't seem to matter if we schedule an online defrag or if we just run one right then on the fly it only runs for a few minutes and then stops and says it's terminating. I didn't even see any errors in the event log. Is it actually running and doing anything? I'm told that if it were really doing anything it would run for an hour or more. We've been having problems with it running for a few months now. We've called Microsoft and they say we have a corrupted IS but we're not ready to rebuild. We're looking for a way to force an online defrag outside of Exchange Admin from a command line prompt. If we have to schedule that first that's fine but we want to kick off ourselves. Not sure if this is possible. Also we do not want to do an offline defrage eseutil/edbutil because that will require taking the services down unless we absolutely have to. Is an offline our only recourse? If there is corruption in the database when you do an offline, will it delete those corrupt files? If so, data loss is expected in an offline. Thanks, Karon Miller Blackwell Sanders Peper Martin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Absolute file protection
Use public folders with permissions set so that only the approved users can access the folders and only the service account can change access? Use a separate server to host these public folders and use a different account for the service account than any other account on your network giving the password only to one of the approved users. Get a separate backup program (and tape drive) for it and make one of the users who is supposed to have access responsible for keeping the media changed and locked up. Get ready to find a new job when something goes wrong and none of these super important documents can be accessed again. This still doesn't stop your users from copying the files to somewhere else either. And still leaves you vulnerable to physical access issues although you can probably set a bios password on the server to prevent boot from floppy or cd and again only give the password to the trusted user. Or lock it in a cage with some form of lock only the trusted users can open. Ronni * My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! - -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature
Ours hovers around 75-80 degrees F, nice on the golf course, not so nice in my server room. :( Brian -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Thanks. I usually build them with lots of Linux. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Hansen, Eric Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Speaking from experience, if you happen to build a computer room, don't let them build it on a wall with lots of windows. It gets hard to maintain 63 degrees in july. :( -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Indeed. The latter does become an issue, esp. in a place like Las Vegas in July. William _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature
Speaking from experience, if you build any room, server or not, with no windows (the glass kind) make sure you have some sort of emergency lighting in it for when the power goes out. Your UPSes' status lights will not provide enough light for you to find your way out of the room unless it is very small. It will take at least 1 monitor on a UPS per 100 square feet, or monitors on UPSes strategically placed along the path out. Or carrying a flashlight in your pocket at all times. Or if you are big enough, a real separate emergency lighting system. In which case, make sure the cable supplying the emergency power does not run right next to the cable supplying the regular power. Ronni -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Speaking from experience, if you happen to build a computer room, don't let them build it on a wall with lots of windows. It gets hard to maintain 63 degrees in july. :( -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT-Computer Room Temperature Indeed. The latter does become an issue, esp. in a place like Las Vegas in July. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cool enough that your equipment doesn't burn up. Not so cool that you drive your electric bill up unnecessarily. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sabo, Eric Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT-Computer Room Temperature What is a desirable computer room temperature? Ours is currently at: 69 Degree Fahrenheit 45 Percent Relative Humidity Is this to hot? Thanks, Eric Sabo NT Administrator Computing Services Center California University of Pennsylvania _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Absolute file protection
stand-alone windows 2000 or .net server in a workgroup with all local accounts. add specific user rights only to each folder leave off admin account uncheck inherit permissions uncheck take ownership - Original Message - From: Orin Rehorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:30 AM Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down
that was it, duh. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down Are you running E2K SP2 or SP3 (you should be). Pre-SP2 was not as good as automatically switching over to another global catalog. And Mike is right, both domain controllers must be global catalogs if you want redundancy for Exchange 2000. HTH, Jim -Original Message- From: Dan Aalberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down Subject: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down Hi All, been a while since I wrote the list. I have an issue with an E2K server (in a cluster). When the main AD controller goes down, the E2K server stops receiving email. There are two LDAP servers in the domain and both look to be configured correctly, i.e., replicating, configured in DNS, etc Shouldn't E2K server realize the main LDAP server is down and try the next? what am I missing. thanks in advance. Dan Aalberg Network Administrator visit http://web1/helpdesk for assistance. the light at the end of the tunnel provided by BNSF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
;) Thanks Ed --- Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1018source= http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1019source= Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That doesn't appear to tell Tony anything more than he already stated he knew. Perhaps you could explain to him the differences between a -1018 error and a -1019 error? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 Description: MSExchangeIS ((353) ) Online defragmentation of database 'D:\exchsrvr\MDBDATA\PRIV.EDB' terminated prematurely after encountering unexpected error -1019. Everything is still working fine. I found some thing like this on technet, but it have the unexpected error -1018 Any info is helpful Thank Tony Nguyen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Global Address List
Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Domain name in OWA
Actually you should fix it in ESM, not IIS. If you make the change in IIS and reboot, you will loose your change. The change made in ESM will flow down to the IIS metabase and be permanent. Walt -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 15, 2002 10:49 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion Conversation: Domain name in OWA Subject: RE: Domain name in OWA You can fix that you know.. In IIS .. Just set the root domain to you name. then you don't have to put it in any more... S that is a secret don't tell anyone else I told you so. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP, And Beyond -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Vincent Avallone Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Domain name in OWA I am once and for all am going to understand something, with your help of course. Whenever we connect to the OWA externally, I must use domain\username. I'm sure why I need to use the domain name at all. The users are all on the same domain. Of course internally it works fine. Please help. -- Vincent Avallone iBiquity Digital (410) 872-1535 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
How long waiteth thee? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
Is the RUS running? -Original Message- From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Were you on the can? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Precht Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions ;) Thanks Ed --- Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1018source= http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1019source= Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That doesn't appear to tell Tony anything more than he already stated he knew. Perhaps you could explain to him the differences between a -1018 error and a -1019 error? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source: ESE97 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Online Defragmentation
Nope. I was in meetings. Argh. --- William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Were you on the can? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Precht Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions ;) Thanks Ed --- Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1018source= http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=1019source= Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Online Defragmentation That doesn't appear to tell Tony anything more than he already stated he knew. Perhaps you could explain to him the differences between a -1018 error and a -1019 error? -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=184source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Nguyen Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:04 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Online Defragmentation I have just this on the Event Viewer. What should I do? Event ID: 184 Source:ESE97 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this?
ROTFLMAO. :-) -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? lol -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? I searched for insight on eventid.net and found nothing. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:31 AM Subject: RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? Hello? He quoted the exact same paragraph from eventID.net in his original post. He indicated it didn't apply and asked for additional insight. -Original Message- From: David N. Precht To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 11/21/2002 11:42 PM Subject: RE: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. http://www.eventid.net/display.asp?eventid=209source= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Yanek Korff Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 14:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Event ID 209 - Can I fix this? Here's the message I'm getting: Event Type: Warning Event Source: MSExchangeMTA Event Category: X.400 Service Event ID: 209 Date: 11/13/2002 Time: 14:16:46 User: N/A Computer: EXCHANGE Description: Global domain identifier (Country, ADMD, PRMD) in first Trace Information of message C=us;A= ;P=rst;L=EXCHANGE0211131916WS5VB3DM does not match MTSID value. [MTA XFER-IN 11 40] (12) According to EventID.NET: This problem seems to be caused by a server being rebuilt in the exchange organization without it being removed first from the organization using Exchange Administrator in RAW mode. Now, I'm not entirely sure if this applies. I'm working on a 5.5 Migration to 2000, bringing in new hardware and changing NT4 to w2k domains. 5.5 server is NT4 in domain RST, E2k is in the new domain but has been added to the original ORG. Can anyone offer insight? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down
Which was it? -Original Message- From: Dan Aalberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down that was it, duh. -Original Message- From: McBee, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 9:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down Are you running E2K SP2 or SP3 (you should be). Pre-SP2 was not as good as automatically switching over to another global catalog. And Mike is right, both domain controllers must be global catalogs if you want redundancy for Exchange 2000. HTH, Jim -Original Message- From: Dan Aalberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 11:16 AM Posted To: Exchange Technical Mailing List Conversation: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down Subject: E2K stops getting mail when LDAP down Hi All, been a while since I wrote the list. I have an issue with an E2K server (in a cluster). When the main AD controller goes down, the E2K server stops receiving email. There are two LDAP servers in the domain and both look to be configured correctly, i.e., replicating, configured in DNS, etc Shouldn't E2K server realize the main LDAP server is down and try the next? what am I missing. thanks in advance. Dan Aalberg Network Administrator visit http://web1/helpdesk for assistance. the light at the end of the tunnel provided by BNSF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems with default message in OOA
We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office Assistant for one of our users will not send out the default message she supplies when she turns it on. Our IMS is configured to disallow OOA messages to the internet, but the message does not even get sent to people in our Exchange environment. If she turns on the OOA and anyone sends her a message for the first time since the OOA is turned on, the OOA reply is not sent back. I set up a rule within the OOA to reply to all messages with a specific template, turned on the OOA and sent a note to her from my account. I got the message configured in the OOA rule, but still didn't get the default message. I looked at article 297281 in the knowledge base, but that doesn't apply here (she doesn't have an alternate recipient enabled.) Has anyone seen this before? -- Leema Lallmamode Arizona State University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with default message in OOA
Use CleanSweep from BORK. -Original Message- From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office Assistant for one of our users will not send out the default message she supplies when she turns it on. Our IMS is configured to disallow OOA messages to the internet, but the message does not even get sent to people in our Exchange environment. If she turns on the OOA and anyone sends her a message for the first time since the OOA is turned on, the OOA reply is not sent back. I set up a rule within the OOA to reply to all messages with a specific template, turned on the OOA and sent a note to her from my account. I got the message configured in the OOA rule, but still didn't get the default message. I looked at article 297281 in the knowledge base, but that doesn't apply here (she doesn't have an alternate recipient enabled.) Has anyone seen this before? -- Leema Lallmamode Arizona State University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Absolute file protection
Thanks to Ronni and Chris for good info, and an Exchange solution. As for the other respondents, next Thursday is Thanksgiving...look out you turkeys! Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html -Original Message- From: Smith, Ronni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Absolute file protection Use public folders with permissions set so that only the approved users can access the folders and only the service account can change access? Use a separate server to host these public folders and use a different account for the service account than any other account on your network giving the password only to one of the approved users. Get a separate backup program (and tape drive) for it and make one of the users who is supposed to have access responsible for keeping the media changed and locked up. Get ready to find a new job when something goes wrong and none of these super important documents can be accessed again. This still doesn't stop your users from copying the files to somewhere else either. And still leaves you vulnerable to physical access issues although you can probably set a bios password on the server to prevent boot from floppy or cd and again only give the password to the trusted user. Or lock it in a cage with some form of lock only the trusted users can open. Ronni * My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! - -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Absolute file protection Am I missing any options? Objective: set up server folder / storage area for access by specified users only (no admin access allowed) in the NT / WIN2K server environment. Options, from worst to best: * Set up a folder with access allowed for specified users only. This will not work in our environment because the admins for the domain can take ownership of any folder. * Set up a separate server and domain with the specified users the only admins. The specified users would have to maintain the domain (and server). Also, with physical access to the server, knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could access the separate server and domain. * Use the password options of Word, Excel and other applications. There are software packages that can crack into these files. * Share a folder on the PC of one of the specified users. Anyone on the LAN with enough knowledge, time, and effort could hack into a shared folder. * Use available software packages to make files in a folder encrypted. Knowledgeable people with enough time and effort could compromise such files. * Store the files on an offsite third party system. It could be made difficult for anyone beyond the specified users to know that this type of storage arrangement had even been set up. Admins of the third party may be able to access the information. Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with default message in OOA
What does CleanSweep do and what is BORK? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with default message in OOA Use CleanSweep from BORK. -Original Message- From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office Assistant for one of our users will not send out the default message she supplies when she turns it on. Our IMS is configured to disallow OOA messages to the internet, but the message does not even get sent to people in our Exchange environment. If she turns on the OOA and anyone sends her a message for the first time since the OOA is turned on, the OOA reply is not sent back. I set up a rule within the OOA to reply to all messages with a specific template, turned on the OOA and sent a note to her from my account. I got the message configured in the OOA rule, but still didn't get the default message. I looked at article 297281 in the knowledge base, but that doesn't apply here (she doesn't have an alternate recipient enabled.) Has anyone seen this before? -- Leema Lallmamode Arizona State University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
I created 2 yesterday and they still haven't shown up. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List How long waiteth thee? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
I'm sorry what is RUS? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:39 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List Is the RUS running? -Original Message- From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
Then, as Chris mentioned... Is the Recipient Update Service running? Try forcing an update or rebuild (you're not too big in number of users are you?). William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions I created 2 yesterday and they still haven't shown up. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List How long waiteth thee? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
Ahh that's what that is. I'll try the rebuild but how would you be able to stop and start RUS? I went to Services and didn't see it in there nor did I see a place to stop it in ESM. Thanks -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:41 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List Then, as Chris mentioned... Is the Recipient Update Service running? Try forcing an update or rebuild (you're not too big in number of users are you?). William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions I created 2 yesterday and they still haven't shown up. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:36 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List How long waiteth thee? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with default message in OOA
Back Office Resource Kit - Original Message - From: MSExchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:33 PM Subject: RE: Problems with default message in OOA What does CleanSweep do and what is BORK? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with default message in OOA Use CleanSweep from BORK. -Original Message- From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office Assistant for one of our users will not send out the default message she supplies when she turns it on. Our IMS is configured to disallow OOA messages to the internet, but the message does not even get sent to people in our Exchange environment. If she turns on the OOA and anyone sends her a message for the first time since the OOA is turned on, the OOA reply is not sent back. I set up a rule within the OOA to reply to all messages with a specific template, turned on the OOA and sent a note to her from my account. I got the message configured in the OOA rule, but still didn't get the default message. I looked at article 297281 in the knowledge base, but that doesn't apply here (she doesn't have an alternate recipient enabled.) Has anyone seen this before? -- Leema Lallmamode Arizona State University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
In Exchange System Manager, navigate to Recipients--Recipient Update Service. Right click on them to see the options to force updates. The RUS is used to generate and update address lists. These include the default one and custom ones created based on LDAP query filters. It provides new users with their addressing. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm sorry what is RUS? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:39 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List Is the RUS running? -Original Message- From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
I am very sad For it seems to be that you have misspelt Krappy When in search of an elliptical dough then please Make mine a bagel. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
lmao -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku I am very sad For it seems to be that you have misspelt Krappy When in search of an elliptical dough then please Make mine a bagel. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
While we're not starving First local Krispy Kreme comes Not too soon, methinks -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku I am very sad For it seems to be that you have misspelt Krappy When in search of an elliptical dough then please Make mine a bagel. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with default message in OOA
BORK is the Back Office Resource Kit. Clean Sweep is a utility on same which based on your problem description would likely result in resolution of the issue. At least, that's what is rumored in the list archives. It's also available from PSS I believe. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Back Office Resource Kit - Original Message - From: MSExchange [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:33 PM Subject: RE: Problems with default message in OOA What does CleanSweep do and what is BORK? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with default message in OOA Use CleanSweep from BORK. -Original Message- From: MSExchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions We are using Exchange 5.5 Sp4 on Windows 2000 Sp2. The Out of Office Assistant for one of our users will not send out the default message she supplies when she turns it on. Our IMS is configured to disallow OOA messages to the internet, but the message does not even get sent to people in our Exchange environment. If she turns on the OOA and anyone sends her a message for the first time since the OOA is turned on, the OOA reply is not sent back. I set up a rule within the OOA to reply to all messages with a specific template, turned on the OOA and sent a note to her from my account. I got the message configured in the OOA rule, but still didn't get the default message. I looked at article 297281 in the knowledge base, but that doesn't apply here (she doesn't have an alternate recipient enabled.) Has anyone seen this before? -- Leema Lallmamode Arizona State University _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
This is intriguing The fuss about Krispy Kreme None in Hawaii. Some clamour for An island Krispy Kreme shop. In-N-Out first, please. (http://www.inandout.com/) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am very sad For it seems to be that you have misspelt Krappy When in search of an elliptical dough then please Make mine a bagel. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others .. .. In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
I know that Cardinal Health tried implementing it and then abandoned it and went with a BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server). It must have been bad, because they really really wanted a Microsoft solution (even though the MIS product was really developed by Wireless Knowledge... We are looking at implementing MS MIS. Has anybody done it? Any good or bad experiences to share? I would love some feedback on it. - Matthew Bailey - -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes snip MS MIS requires AD so if you don't AD, it's out of the question for now. My two cents... Brian snip _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday - Krispy Kreme Haiku
You sir are but bless'd. For today they spoke: U K gets twenty-five stores I do find in and out a valid name. what goes in must then come out. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Schorr Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions This is intriguing The fuss about Krispy Kreme None in Hawaii. Some clamour for An island Krispy Kreme shop. In-N-Out first, please. (http://www.inandout.com/) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am very sad For it seems to be that you have misspelt Krappy When in search of an elliptical dough then please Make mine a bagel. :o) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions I noted that recently there's been a lack of Friday Haiku, thus since Im a poor writter myself I have these few from a recent thread from some friends...As we just got a Krispy Kreme down the roadI pass along these writting from the thread... to you and others .. .. In dark ages past We were denied Krispy Kremes Now we are redeemed! ( That first line of yours Not five beats by a long shot You should try again ) Donuts tempt me. I yield like Homer Simpson. Diet tomorrow. Bane of my diet My sugary tormentor Krispy Kremes defeat me Jeans are getting tight. Krispy Kremes taste good, but no... I'll have a carrot Bodacious carb rings Some filled, all dipped in sugar Enhance my fatness Krispy Kremes are fried. They plug up my arteries. Oops...a heart attack. Less than a week left Oh ... the doughnuts will be hot I want them all now! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Routing restrictions Exchange 5.5
Well it looks like what I am going to do is set up distro lists for each site and send the mail to the list then have anyone that needs to get the alerts on the list. Sucks for me. Alot of administration. But I plan to set up a server to automatically do this for me in the future since all information is located on a SQL server. Thanks for the info tho. As always I am learning more and more about exchange. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Plus I'm told you can throw a Blackberry against the wall with no ill effects. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions I know that Cardinal Health tried implementing it and then abandoned it and went with a BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server). It must have been bad, because they really really wanted a Microsoft solution (even though the MIS product was really developed by Wireless Knowledge... We are looking at implementing MS MIS. Has anybody done it? Any good or bad experiences to share? I would love some feedback on it. - Matthew Bailey - -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes snip MS MIS requires AD so if you don't AD, it's out of the question for now. My two cents... Brian snip __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes
Except for a rather annoying and stubborn stain. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes Plus I'm told you can throw a Blackberry against the wall with no ill effects. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions I know that Cardinal Health tried implementing it and then abandoned it and went with a BES (Blackberry Enterprise Server). It must have been bad, because they really really wanted a Microsoft solution (even though the MIS product was really developed by Wireless Knowledge... We are looking at implementing MS MIS. Has anybody done it? Any good or bad experiences to share? I would love some feedback on it. - Matthew Bailey - -Original Message- From: Brian Ko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 8:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PDA recommendations for access to Exchange 2000 mailboxes snip MS MIS requires AD so if you don't AD, it's out of the question for now. My two cents... Brian snip __ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Global Address List
Ok I tried the Update now and Rebuild and still nothing. This is really strange. Any other ideas? Thanks -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:46 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List In Exchange System Manager, navigate to Recipients--Recipient Update Service. Right click on them to see the options to force updates. The RUS is used to generate and update address lists. These include the default one and custom ones created based on LDAP query filters. It provides new users with their addressing. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Newsgroups Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions I'm sorry what is RUS? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, November 22, 2002 9:39 AM Posted To: Exchange Newsgroups Conversation: Global Address List Subject: RE: Global Address List Is the RUS running? -Original Message- From: Newsgroups [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 11:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Yesterday I noticed that every time I create a new user they do not show up in the gal. I made sure that Hide from the Exchange address list was unchecked. I searched MS KB and found Q315531 but that is not the case with me since I have not even touched the filtering of the GAL. It is still using the Default one. Any Ideas? By the way I am running Exchange 2000 SP3. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
