Re: Rules Wizard Client/Server rules
Just choose server. On 3/5/03 23:26, Chakravarty, Sakti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am looking for a way to export Rules in Outlook. I need to amend a rule on a particular mailbox hosted on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 Server. When I open Rules Wizard (with Outlook 2000 SR-1), I am prompted to make a selection between keeping the Client or Server rules on the machine (Q287640). Since I did not set up this mailbox, I do not know what rules have been created, and am apprehensive about losing rules I do not know about. It is an administrative mailbox with a rule to email reports to particular recipients, and therefore I suspect that I should select to keep the Server-side rules (I understand that Client-side rules require the client to be running). Articles I have seen that suggest using the Rules Wizard Export feature do not help, as I cannot get past the select Server / Client prompt to use the Export feature. This is the case in Outlook 2000 and 2002. I attempted to use EXMERGE to try and get the messages and rules out to PST, but saw no rules in the exported version. (Have also seen many articles discussing the dubious nature of this feature.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Rules Wizard Client/Server rules
Start outlook in offline mode - it shouldn't try to connect and therefore won't find out/know about the server side rules. Look at export the rules. Reconnect on online mode, select 'keep server'. Look at export those rules. Decide what you want to keep. Oh, I've never tried this, but I *think* it'll work. G -Original Message- From: Chakravarty, Sakti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 March 2003 05:26 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Rules Wizard Client/Server rules Hi all, I am looking for a way to export Rules in Outlook. I need to amend a rule on a particular mailbox hosted on an Exchange 5.5 SP4 Server. When I open Rules Wizard (with Outlook 2000 SR-1), I am prompted to make a selection between keeping the Client or Server rules on the machine (Q287640). Since I did not set up this mailbox, I do not know what rules have been created, and am apprehensive about losing rules I do not know about. It is an administrative mailbox with a rule to email reports to particular recipients, and therefore I suspect that I should select to keep the Server-side rules (I understand that Client-side rules require the client to be running). Articles I have seen that suggest using the Rules Wizard Export feature do not help, as I cannot get past the select Server / Client prompt to use the Export feature. This is the case in Outlook 2000 and 2002. I attempted to use EXMERGE to try and get the messages and rules out to PST, but saw no rules in the exported version. (Have also seen many articles discussing the dubious nature of this feature.) Any help appreciated, Thanks Sakti _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
No-one has every hacked my employer's website either. I think this demonstrates patching the web server is a waste of time, so I shall stop doing that. Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 March 2003 17:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, Snopes. The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. Cheers, Allison On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the following: Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? Thx for ideas... byron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites have been hacked in the past, so it makes sense to patch the systems. With the OOO and burglary argument, no one has proven that it has ever occured. AW On Thursday 06 March 2003 12:57 pm, you wrote: No-one has every hacked my employer's website either. I think this demonstrates patching the web server is a waste of time, so I shall stop doing that. Robert Moir MSMVP IT Systems Engineer Luton Sixth Form College Ciderspace: An online 3D virtual reality environment for tramps. Ciderspace Cafe: A park Bench. -Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 March 2003 17:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? Ed, since you use this example often, can you provide me with some real world examples of someone being burglarized because their OOO message told the world they were away? I think I am more likely to be burglarized by a neighbour that notices I am gone, or someone that sees my postbox has been emptied in days, or someone overhearing me order plane/train tickets, etc. This issue has also been discussed on the urban legend debunking site, Snopes. The link is http://www.snopes.com/crime/intent/reply.htm I look forward to hearing your opinion or some proof of this happening. Cheers, Allison On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:39 am, you wrote: The risk of a mail loop with OOO is small. However, consider the following: Byron Kennedy is out of the office vacationing in the south of France until the end of the summer. Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any Street, Anytown, USA, and help yourself to whatever is left. If you are a spammer, then you've hit a live mailbox! Tell your friends! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Byron Kennedy Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OOO to internet, still bad? I know this has caused havoc on e-mail systems in the past. Is this still frowned on and if so, are there any best-practices available out there on how to enable a firm to provide this service effectively with exchange 2000, outlook 2000/xp and avoid pitfalls in the past? How do others articulate or provide work-arounds? Thx for ideas... byron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
-Original Message- From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 06 March 2003 12:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites have been hacked in the past, so it makes sense to patch the systems. With the OOO and burglary argument, no one has proven that it has ever occured. Nor have they proven its never been a factor. In the absense of definitive data in either direction I find that caution is the safest option. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Orphans
I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Orphans
They need to be restored from backup. On 3/6/03 7:43, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
One can prove that OOO information has been used in social engineering hacks though, so doesn't that make the point moot? On 3/6/03 6:27, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites have been hacked in the past, so it makes sense to patch the systems. With the OOO and burglary argument, no one has proven that it has ever occured. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folder Orphans
I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NDR for specific domain
A couple of days ago, I set up a SMTP connector on my E2K SP3 server so that I can block external email access for some users. I configured it as per the MS document and all seemed to be working fine. If that domain's mail server is doing reverse DNS look ups and your host names don't match, you won't be able to send mail to them until you fix it. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Sure. I'm not absolutley convinced, but I will let this die. My users still want to use the OOO's even after I explain about more Spam and the annoyance/inconvenience to the customers, so I can't see them suddenly not using them because of a 1 in a million chance of a social engineering/security problem. Thanks for the opinions. AW On Thursday 06 March 2003 03:06 pm, you wrote: One can prove that OOO information has been used in social engineering hacks though, so doesn't that make the point moot? On 3/6/03 6:27, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites have been hacked in the past, so it makes sense to patch the systems. With the OOO and burglary argument, no one has proven that it has ever occured. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Orphans
How can I remove the Orphaned PF? I thought I saw that article somewhere but now I cannot find it . . . :( - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans They need to be restored from backup. On 3/6/03 7:43, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrade problem 5.5 2k
This knowledge base article should help you out. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;256862 The key is to be patient and let replication do its work. -Matt Matthew Bailey LAN Engineer CSK Auto, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Office: (602) 631-7486 Fax: (602) 294-7486 Chaos reigns within. Reflect, repent, and reboot. Order shall return. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Upgrade problem 5.5 2k Ah... Forgot to run NTDSNoMatch eh? You can disconnect a mailbox and connect it to another. Then disconnect the disabled mailbox enabled user account which has your mailbox and connect it to your own. On 3/5/03 19:43, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, upgraded our 5.5 server to 2k. everyone seems to be fine except me. The problem is that it pointed my user to a different mailbox. This mailbox is just for daily delivery of data files so no one else is affected. But, it gave me its e-mail address and alias, everything but the logon name. The account that I got now has no e-mail address. This I can fix but how can I get my mailbox back? Or am I screwed? The original 5.5 server got the upgrade so everything should be there but how can I link back to it? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO to internet, still bad?
Guess that depends on the business you are in. There's no magic argument which is going to shut down OOO for all businesses, nor (likely) should there be. On 3/6/03 8:20, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sure. I'm not absolutley convinced, but I will let this die. My users still want to use the OOO's even after I explain about more Spam and the annoyance/inconvenience to the customers, so I can't see them suddenly not using them because of a 1 in a million chance of a social engineering/security problem. Thanks for the opinions. AW On Thursday 06 March 2003 03:06 pm, you wrote: One can prove that OOO information has been used in social engineering hacks though, so doesn't that make the point moot? On 3/6/03 6:27, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites have been hacked in the past, so it makes sense to patch the systems. With the OOO and burglary argument, no one has proven that it has ever occured. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Orphans
http://support.microsoft.com search = orphan public folder On 3/6/03 8:19, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I remove the Orphaned PF? I thought I saw that article somewhere but now I cannot find it . . . :( - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans They need to be restored from backup. On 3/6/03 7:43, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OOO web app
Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public Folder Orphans
thanks! I have it now. Didnt show up on my technet cd and when I did support.ms.com I was using orphaned. Once I used Orphan I got it. Support.ms.com can be cagey that way sometimes! Appreciated. Chris - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:33 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans http://support.microsoft.com search = orphan public folder On 3/6/03 8:19, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How can I remove the Orphaned PF? I thought I saw that article somewhere but now I cannot find it . . . :( - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Public Folder Orphans They need to be restored from backup. On 3/6/03 7:43, Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was removing replicas of my public folders from one server. all public folders were replicated to ajc-mail3 and ajc-mail1 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all delete ajc-mail3 yes then added a new server as we are removing ajc-mail3 pfadmin chrish setreplicas all add kbc-mailpf yes once finished, I realized there were four lone folders that were replicated ONLY on ajc-mail3 Now they appear to be orphaned. I can see them but cannot access them. is there a way to get them back without a restore from backups? I cannot find an article that says yes, only how to set permissions on orphaned public folders. any ideas? hindsight being what it is I realize I should have done those two operations in reverse order. Doh! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO web app
OWA allows you to set OOO. Why not just use that? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO web app
That's to easy;-) I am creating an app the will allow me to do many admin functions from one spot and this will be one function as I get many users who forget to turn it on. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO web app OWA allows you to set OOO. Why not just use that? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO web app
Maybe dig into the OWA code and see how it works. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions That's to easy;-) I am creating an app the will allow me to do many admin functions from one spot and this will be one function as I get many users who forget to turn it on. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OOO web app OWA allows you to set OOO. Why not just use that? -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO web app
The ability to set OOO exists in OWA. If you need to separate it from there you could look at the code of the pages in OWA. -Patrick R. Sweeney http://boston.craigslist.org/bos/res/8484283.html - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:54 AM Subject: OOO web app Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving ES 2K to a New Domain / Organization / Site / etc.
Backup exec won't work for this task.. A solution like exmerge, wrapped in a bunch of other processes or perhaps a tool like Exchange Migrator from NetIQ would be required. On 3/6/03 9:50, Trevor Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to move all of my ES2K data in DOMAIN1, ORG1, SERVER1 to a DOMAIN2, ORG2, SERVER2. My current backups are done with Backup Exec 9.0 (online, of course). What's the best way of doing this. Can I restore using Backup Exec ... I've read that I need the same organization and site name? Or should I use something like EXMERGE? I've been testing with Backup Exec but all I get is Access Denied errors even though the stores are unmounted and I am logged in and using Backup Exec with the Administrator account. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OOO web app
Programmatically trying to do something in Exchange.. Have you looked at www.cdolive.com? On 3/6/03 8:54, Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question
In 5.5 I can set up in the routing tab of the IMS to reroute incoming SMTP mail, sent to whatever domain to relay, overriding relay restrictions even tho the mail is coming from another site. Where is this in 2k? I was able to see some things that were close but not quite what I needed and tinkering with them I could not get them to work. This functionality was perfect for our needs and I had to undo my upgrade last night because I was unable to duplicate this functionality. For some background here is my scenario. Have a pc in the field that if it sees an alarm state will send out e-mails. Normally it will just send to me here and all was fine but we needed to add other addresses like pagers, cell phones remote users in different domains etc. The last thing I want to to is make my server and open relay. Our config was fine since if someone wanted relay from my server it would reject it if it was not 1. ony my internal network or 2. sending mail to any of the domains listed in the routing table. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
backup exec best practices
any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question
Starting a new thread on the same topic is probably not as useful as replying to the response(s) to your existing thread. Did you add the IP address of the machine in question as one allowed to relay through your server? The way you'd done it previously was sub-optimal. Rather trying to recreate a sub-optimal solution, why not concentrate on achieving the desired results through generally accepted methods? On 3/6/03 9:57, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In 5.5 I can set up in the routing tab of the IMS to reroute incoming SMTP mail, sent to whatever domain to relay, overriding relay restrictions even tho the mail is coming from another site. Where is this in 2k? I was able to see some things that were close but not quite what I needed and tinkering with them I could not get them to work. This functionality was perfect for our needs and I had to undo my upgrade last night because I was unable to duplicate this functionality. For some background here is my scenario. Have a pc in the field that if it sees an alarm state will send out e-mails. Normally it will just send to me here and all was fine but we needed to add other addresses like pagers, cell phones remote users in different domains etc. The last thing I want to to is make my server and open relay. Our config was fine since if someone wanted relay from my server it would reject it if it was not 1. ony my internal network or 2. sending mail to any of the domains listed in the routing table. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: backup exec best practices
Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO web app
Didn't think about that, but that's definitely the place to start looking. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 7:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Programmatically trying to do something in Exchange.. Have you looked at www.cdolive.com? On 3/6/03 8:54, Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to create a web app that you can use to set individual users OOO (exchange 2000)? I cant find the object(If there is one) that points to OOO. I am not a developer by far, but if someone could point me in the right direction it would be much appreciated. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup exec best practices
Thanks Andy for those tips. I guess we need the outlook client or mapi client installed to get the job completion notification via email. also to get the single mailbox backup we need to have the mailbox by the same name of the user id Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup exec best practices
Thanks Andy for those tips. I guess we need the outlook client or mapi client installed to get the job completion notification via email. also to get the single mailbox backup we need to have the mailbox by the same name of the user id Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Upgrading -- NT4 PDC w/ Exchange 5.5 to Win2k w/ Exchange2k
You do one after the other, Windows first. Remember to change the Exchange 5.5 LDAP port. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Derrenbacker, L. Jonathan Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 2:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Upgrading -- NT4 PDC w/ Exchange 5.5 to Win2k w/ Exchange2k I have a client that has 1 server. It's a PDC running NT4 and exchange5.5. They just bought a new windows 2000 server and want to migrate from the old server to the new one(they want the old server gone). Any ideas? I know how to migrate a NT4 PDC to a Windows 2000 DC. And I know how to migrate a 5.5 box to a exchange 2k box, but I have no idea how to do both at the same time on the same box... Thanks in advance . _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question
Recreating the thread I felt I needed to do to make some things more clear than what I did earlier. To expand of my scenario, the remote PC is actually 312 remote PC's. So entering their IP addresses is not really an option. Suboptimal will do for now as we are in the process of writing software so that we can just send a single e-mail to our alert mailbox, then it will look at the alert for type and site, grab the e-mails from a database and send them out from there. But it seems that we need exchange 2k to write the software. But that part is out of my arena. I am just trying to get 2k to work as 5.5 does work now. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: backup exec best practices
8.6? Nope, you can specify any SMTP server. No need to install Outlook on the BE server. Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: RE: backup exec best practices Thanks Andy for those tips. I guess we need the outlook client or mapi client installed to get the job completion notification via email. also to get the single mailbox backup we need to have the mailbox by the same name of the user id Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup exec best practices
I have backup exec 9.0 for windows server and I have it installed on the exchange server itself I did not get you on the Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices 8.6? Nope, you can specify any SMTP server. No need to install Outlook on the BE server. Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: RE: backup exec best practices Thanks Andy for those tips. I guess we need the outlook client or mapi client installed to get the job completion notification via email. also to get the single mailbox backup we need to have the mailbox by the same name of the user id Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Install ADC before running Forest prep.
I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: backup exec best practices
Ok, 9.0 will be the same as far as that goes. Check the archives re: that last statement :) - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:19 AM Subject: RE: backup exec best practices I have backup exec 9.0 for windows server and I have it installed on the exchange server itself I did not get you on the Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices 8.6? Nope, you can specify any SMTP server. No need to install Outlook on the BE server. Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: RE: backup exec best practices Thanks Andy for those tips. I guess we need the outlook client or mapi client installed to get the job completion notification via email. also to get the single mailbox backup we need to have the mailbox by the same name of the user id Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup exec best practices
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exchange.htm Check the FAQ (above - appendix B) and/or the list archives, but mailbox backups (aka brick level backups) are not highly recommended by the experts here. They significantly increase your backup time and tape usage, and do not capture the server-level info (System State, etc.) needed to do a full server recovery. You would end up needing to do a full online backup anyway for that reason. There are other methods (Ed C's never restore mailbox thingie in the FAQ for 5.5 and Mailbox Recovery in Ex2K) that eliminate the need to also back up individual mailboxes. Use BE to do a full server backup, which will capture all mailbox data, and practice using those tapes for disaster recovery purposes. -Original Message- From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: backup exec best practices I have backup exec 9.0 for windows server and I have it installed on the exchange server itself I did not get you on the Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices 8.6? Nope, you can specify any SMTP server. No need to install Outlook on the BE server. Single Mailbox backups are not a fan favorite. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:12 AM Subject: RE: backup exec best practices Thanks Andy for those tips. I guess we need the outlook client or mapi client installed to get the job completion notification via email. also to get the single mailbox backup we need to have the mailbox by the same name of the user id Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: backup exec best practices Set up job completion notification via email. Verify your backups periodically on your disaster recovery test server. - Original Message - From: Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:56 AM Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Argh.... login denied....
I'm looking this up as we speak my service account (exchange god account) is not able to open mailboxes (Unable to open your default e-mail folders...). As far as I can tell, it just started recently (last couple days) so I'm sure something changed... Exchange 2000 sp3. I checked, and it has full control on the mailboxes. It's a member of: domain admins domain users enterprise admins exchange domain servers exchange services schema admins Argh... I'm looking but in the meantime... anyone know what simple little thing I'm missing? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Of course it your own company's prerogative to determine what is in its own best interests. I presented an argument against; the arguments for are obvious. My employer, which has fairly enlightened IT policies allows Out Of Office to the Internet. Therefore, I personally do not use it! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allison M. Wittstock Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? Sure. I'm not absolutley convinced, but I will let this die. My users still want to use the OOO's even after I explain about more Spam and the annoyance/inconvenience to the customers, so I can't see them suddenly not using them because of a 1 in a million chance of a social engineering/security problem. Thanks for the opinions. AW On Thursday 06 March 2003 03:06 pm, you wrote: One can prove that OOO information has been used in social engineering hacks though, so doesn't that make the point moot? On 3/6/03 6:27, Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But in that case, it is well known that thousand and thousands of websites have been hacked in the past, so it makes sense to patch the systems. With the OOO and burglary argument, no one has proven that it has ever occured. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Argh.... login denied....
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=262054 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Argh login denied Subject: Argh login denied I'm looking this up as we speak my service account (exchange god account) is not able to open mailboxes (Unable to open your default e-mail folders...). As far as I can tell, it just started recently (last couple days) so I'm sure something changed... Exchange 2000 sp3. I checked, and it has full control on the mailboxes. It's a member of: domain admins domain users enterprise admins exchange domain servers exchange services schema admins Argh... I'm looking but in the meantime... anyone know what simple little thing I'm missing? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Argh.... login denied....
ok yeah in the techinal sense there's no service account. But we made one. And I believe we used option 3. If I look at the advanced permissions for a mailbox, exservice (it's our creative account name...), Exchange Domain Servers and Exchange Services all have Full Mailbox access to the account (actually, they have everything but assoc. external). However, exservice is now (in the past couple days...) getting unable to open... Last week I was able to just fine... I'm still looking to see if I can find what some #$%% changed while I wasn't looking... then I'm going to kill them and make sure no one else can change it. -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:42 PM Posted To: List - Exchange Server List Conversation: Argh login denied Subject: RE: Argh login denied http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=262054 -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:37 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Argh login denied Subject: Argh login denied I'm looking this up as we speak my service account (exchange god account) is not able to open mailboxes (Unable to open your default e-mail folders...). As far as I can tell, it just started recently (last couple days) so I'm sure something changed... Exchange 2000 sp3. I checked, and it has full control on the mailboxes. It's a member of: domain admins domain users enterprise admins exchange domain servers exchange services schema admins Argh... I'm looking but in the meantime... anyone know what simple little thing I'm missing? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA config
Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config
Yes. More information available when you say what version of Exchange you use. -Original Message- From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:47 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA config Subject: OWA config Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config
exchange 5.5 sir Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA config Yes. More information available when you say what version of Exchange you use. -Original Message- From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:47 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA config Subject: OWA config Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config
Exchange 2000 front-end/back-end scenario can do that. So your answer is to upgrade, in this case. -Original Message- From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:55 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA config Subject: RE: OWA config exchange 5.5 sir Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA config Yes. More information available when you say what version of Exchange you use. -Original Message- From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:47 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: OWA config Subject: OWA config Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: backup exec best practices
UNINSTALL? :p -Original Message- From: Santhosh, H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: backup exec best practices any suggestions while scheduling the regular backup exec. I have done few of the below overwrite protection 1 week and allow infinite append backup full flush commit logs etc Let me know if u have any more points Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Meeting Requests and Delegates
Hello all, Mrs. Smith has been set up as a delegate for Mr. Jones, such that meeting requests, etc. are sent to her. We are using Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP 4. When Mrs. Smith sends a meeting request on behalf or Mr. Jones, the acceptances/declines are received in her mailbox and never appear in Attendee Availability tab in the original meeting item in Mr. Jones calendar. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Thanks Chris Chris Tanner AECL Chalk River, Canada _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Duplicate calendar entries...
Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I have a user that gets duplicated meeting messages, not on all meeting message but some of them. Also, this same user calendar shows these meetings and Tentative even though he does not open the meeting messages. He has a delegate but since she has reported this problem, does not open these messages. Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there a solution other than getting off of Outlook 98. Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PF Advice
If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question
Ok[1], well no offense, but I'm not going to extend any effort in my lab trying to make what you want to happen work because sub-optimal was polite-speak for stupid. I'll point you to Recipient Policies and let you try and create it again if that's really the route you want to take. Did I mention you can enter subnets for routing as well? That might be a useful tidbit of information, now that 1 machine has become 312 or perhaps not. Beyond that, I still think the method you are currently using and seem bent on continuing to use is sub-optimal. Why not create a Contact in your GAL to represent this object with a secondary SMTP address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1] Why not just add the additional data to the existing thread?[2] [2] And not oversnip as was done here? On 3/6/03 10:17, Jerry J. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Recreating the thread I felt I needed to do to make some things more clear than what I did earlier. To expand of my scenario, the remote PC is actually 312 remote PC's. So entering their IP addresses is not really an option. Suboptimal will do for now as we are in the process of writing software so that we can just send a single e-mail to our alert mailbox, then it will look at the alert for type and site, grab the e-mails from a database and send them out from there. But it seems that we need exchange 2k to write the software. But that part is out of my arena. I am just trying to get 2k to work as 5.5 does work now. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA config
In 5.5? It's a two step process... 1.Install OWA. 2. Stop. Optional 3rd step: Drink beer and marvel at the ease of use. On 3/6/03 11:47, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Duplicate calendar entries...
So.. Are you claiming two problems or one? On 3/6/03 13:18, Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I have a user that gets duplicated meeting messages, not on all meeting message but some of them. Also, this same user calendar shows these meetings and Tentative even though he does not open the meeting messages. He has a delegate but since she has reported this problem, does not open these messages. Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there a solution other than getting off of Outlook 98. Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Duplicate calendar entries...
Two problems but I believe they are really related somehow along the way -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Duplicate calendar entries... So.. Are you claiming two problems or one? On 3/6/03 13:18, Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I have a user that gets duplicated meeting messages, not on all meeting message but some of them. Also, this same user calendar shows these meetings and Tentative even though he does not open the meeting messages. He has a delegate but since she has reported this problem, does not open these messages. Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there a solution other than getting off of Outlook 98. Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config
Its not like that. you have to install the OWA server pointing to the bridge head server. this bridge head server will in turn connect to the required server when client makes a request to access a mailbox from some other server this is the latest I heard from my principals Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA config In 5.5? It's a two step process... 1.Install OWA. 2. Stop. Optional 3rd step: Drink beer and marvel at the ease of use. On 3/6/03 11:47, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PF Advice
The public folder hierarchy (as opposed to content) is replicated through the directory replication mechanism. Therefore, if you have an inconsistent directory, you could have a replication problem. You didn't say whether these servers are in the same site or not; if they are in different sites, you should check directory replication between sites and how public folder affinity is set. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates
You're dating yourself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You need to alias smith and jones. Get it? Alias Smith and Jones!! Sorry, I had to do it -Original Message- From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, Mrs. Smith has been set up as a delegate for Mr. Jones, such that meeting requests, etc. are sent to her. We are using Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP 4. When Mrs. Smith sends a meeting request on behalf or Mr. Jones, the acceptances/declines are received in her mailbox and never appear in Attendee Availability tab in the original meeting item in Mr. Jones calendar. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Thanks Chris Chris Tanner AECL Chalk River, Canada _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config
In other words, one OWA server should properly serve all Exchange users in a site by default. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA config In 5.5? It's a two step process... 1.Install OWA. 2. Stop. Optional 3rd step: Drink beer and marvel at the ease of use. On 3/6/03 11:47, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA config
If you know the answers why are you asking us the questions? Or go ask your principals how to do it then! Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Santhosh, H. Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA config Its not like that. you have to install the OWA server pointing to the bridge head server. this bridge head server will in turn connect to the required server when client makes a request to access a mailbox from some other server this is the latest I heard from my principals Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA config In 5.5? It's a two step process... 1.Install OWA. 2. Stop. Optional 3rd step: Drink beer and marvel at the ease of use. On 3/6/03 11:47, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This message and any attachments are intended for the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not forward, copy, print, use or disclose this communication to others; also please notify the sender by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. The Timken Company ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Directory Import to Create Custom Recipients in Ex 5.5
Any pointers on how to do that? I can use the import functions to create or update normal mailboxes and to update existing Custom Recipients but I can't find the correct format to get it to create NEW CR's. I am trying to add 60 new SMTP addresses as CR's to hold us over a few months before moving another divisions mailboxes over to our exchange server/org. Thanks for your help in advance. Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Isn't that what I said? Let me rephrase: You must run ADC if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site in order to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. There is no choice in this circumstance. ForestPrep will not run in this situation without the ADC having been installed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates
Not even you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Meeting Requests and Delegates He has to date himself, no one else will. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You're dating yourself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You need to alias smith and jones. Get it? Alias Smith and Jones!! Sorry, I had to do it -Original Message- From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, Mrs. Smith has been set up as a delegate for Mr. Jones, such that meeting requests, etc. are sent to her. We are using Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP 4. When Mrs. Smith sends a meeting request on behalf or Mr. Jones, the acceptances/declines are received in her mailbox and never appear in Attendee Availability tab in the original meeting item in Mr. Jones calendar. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Thanks Chris Chris Tanner AECL Chalk River, Canada _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Meeting Requests and Delegates
Depends on what beer is served. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates Not even you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Meeting Requests and Delegates He has to date himself, no one else will. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You're dating yourself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You need to alias smith and jones. Get it? Alias Smith and Jones!! Sorry, I had to do it -Original Message- From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, Mrs. Smith has been set up as a delegate for Mr. Jones, such that meeting requests, etc. are sent to her. We are using Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP 4. When Mrs. Smith sends a meeting request on behalf or Mr. Jones, the acceptances/declines are received in her mailbox and never appear in Attendee Availability tab in the original meeting item in Mr. Jones calendar. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Thanks Chris Chris Tanner AECL Chalk River, Canada _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe that. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Isn't that what I said? Let me rephrase: You must run ADC if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site in order to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. There is no choice in this circumstance. ForestPrep will not run in this situation without the ADC having been installed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
Tell Hanji he's wrong. - Original Message - From: Fabrig, Amado [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:24 PM Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe that. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Isn't that what I said? Let me rephrase: You must run ADC if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site in order to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. There is no choice in this circumstance. ForestPrep will not run in this situation without the ADC having been installed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Re: PF Advice
Sorry, yes all same site. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice The public folder hierarchy (as opposed to content) is replicated through the directory replication mechanism. Therefore, if you have an inconsistent directory, you could have a replication problem. You didn't say whether these servers are in the same site or not; if they are in different sites, you should check directory replication between sites and how public folder affinity is set. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Directory Import to Create Custom Recipients in Ex 5.5
In the Mode field specify CREATE and in the Obj-Class field specify Remote. The outbound address goes in E-Mail Address. Assign a unique Directory Name. The local addresses will automatically be created, or you can specify them in E-Mail Addresses for the first of eacy type and Secondary-Proxy-Addresses for extras. Addresses take the form of SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Separate multiple addresses with the specified field separator, usually %. Complete the remaining fields as you wish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Directory Import to Create Custom Recipients in Ex 5.5 Any pointers on how to do that? I can use the import functions to create or update normal mailboxes and to update existing Custom Recipients but I can't find the correct format to get it to create NEW CR's. I am trying to add 60 new SMTP addresses as CR's to hold us over a few months before moving another divisions mailboxes over to our exchange server/org. Thanks for your help in advance. Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates
Such as any? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Meeting Requests and Delegates Depends on what beer is served. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:22 PM Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates Not even you? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Meeting Requests and Delegates He has to date himself, no one else will. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:10 PM Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You're dating yourself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Meeting Requests and Delegates You need to alias smith and jones. Get it? Alias Smith and Jones!! Sorry, I had to do it -Original Message- From: Chris tanner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hello all, Mrs. Smith has been set up as a delegate for Mr. Jones, such that meeting requests, etc. are sent to her. We are using Outlook 2000 on Exchange 5.5 SP 4. When Mrs. Smith sends a meeting request on behalf or Mr. Jones, the acceptances/declines are received in her mailbox and never appear in Attendee Availability tab in the original meeting item in Mr. Jones calendar. Any ideas as to what is happening here? Thanks Chris Chris Tanner AECL Chalk River, Canada _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep.
No matter. He still won't believe you. Let him do the first install and he'll find out for himself. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Thank you. That's what I thought. Someone here doesn't believe that. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Isn't that what I said? Let me rephrase: You must run ADC if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site in order to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. There is no choice in this circumstance. ForestPrep will not run in this situation without the ADC having been installed. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fabrig, Amado Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. So you do have to run ADC first before forest prep? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March/06/2003 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. And that answer is that you must run ADC, no choice here, if you are joining Exchange 2000 to an Exchange 5.5 site to replicate the Exchange 5.5 site information. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Install ADC before running Forest prep. Ignore this questionsorry found answer in another book... ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... -Original Message- From: John Strongosky Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Install ADC before running Forest prep. I'm reading the Six step Case Scenario from Microsoft dated June 2002, and in it they mention that it is important to install the ADC before I run Forest Prep for coexistence with 5.5. Now I was told by a 3rd party vendor to run forest prep first and also this is the only place that I've seen in doing my research for EX2k deployment that it says to do this. Any thoughts ___ \\ - - // ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@--) +-oOOo-(_)-oOOo--+ |\\_|_// | |John M. Strongosky, |San Diego Community College |District Email Administrator |Phone: 619.388.6725 |8bits down a wire, spoken words fly away, |while written word's stay on +--Oooo--+ oooO ( ) ( ) ) / \ ( (_/ \_) Remember 9/11, In an Atom Bomb, Chemical, and Biological Detonation we are all Downwinder's... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Using Directory Import to Create Custom Recipients in Ex 5.5
Wonderful! Thanks a lot Ed! --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Directory Import to Create Custom Recipients in Ex 5.5 In the Mode field specify CREATE and in the Obj-Class field specify Remote. The outbound address goes in E-Mail Address. Assign a unique Directory Name. The local addresses will automatically be created, or you can specify them in E-Mail Addresses for the first of eacy type and Secondary-Proxy-Addresses for extras. Addresses take the form of SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. Separate multiple addresses with the specified field separator, usually %. Complete the remaining fields as you wish. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ml.exchange Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Directory Import to Create Custom Recipients in Ex 5.5 Any pointers on how to do that? I can use the import functions to create or update normal mailboxes and to update existing Custom Recipients but I can't find the correct format to get it to create NEW CR's. I am trying to add 60 new SMTP addresses as CR's to hold us over a few months before moving another divisions mailboxes over to our exchange server/org. Thanks for your help in advance. Miles --- Miles Holt Network Engineer Summit Marketing [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-303-0426 --- Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: PF Advice
Also, they can see the folders just not the complete (or sometimes none) of the content. All are folder owners. All users with mailboxes on the other mailservers in the same site can see all the content. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice The public folder hierarchy (as opposed to content) is replicated through the directory replication mechanism. Therefore, if you have an inconsistent directory, you could have a replication problem. You didn't say whether these servers are in the same site or not; if they are in different sites, you should check directory replication between sites and how public folder affinity is set. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
No send on a mailbox
Exch5.5 sp4/win 2k sp3 On a mailbox is there a way to tell admin that the mailbox can reviece but not send? Other then setting the send limit to 0? E- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PF Advice
Then it seems that something is funky with replication. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: PF Advice Sorry, yes all same site. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:12 PM Subject: RE: PF Advice The public folder hierarchy (as opposed to content) is replicated through the directory replication mechanism. Therefore, if you have an inconsistent directory, you could have a replication problem. You didn't say whether these servers are in the same site or not; if they are in different sites, you should check directory replication between sites and how public folder affinity is set. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PF Advice If users on mail server A can see public folders homed on that server and replicated to mail server B all on the same subnet (all about 10 feet away from each other). Users on mail Server C (same subnet and server room) can only see about half of them. Is this a Directory Services refresh I need to do? Something else? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Orphaned adress book views
Hi All: Win2k/Exch 5.5 SP4 I still have invalid Address Book Views long after connectors after been removed, sites have been deleted and tombstones have expired. How can I delete these views of non-existent sites/servers? Thanks -Liz Ashraph- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Relaying in 5.5 and 2k question
First of all, thank you for your input. I think that I am getting what I need taken care of for now. I will agree that sub-optimal is not the way to go but for the time being it is a satisfactory workaround. More than half of the legacy systems will not support any kind of authentication to my mail server. What we are deploying now will. The main problem I am facing is that this is to be done and now. My boss does not accept that since it works in 5.5 that it will not work in 2000. Again I am just looking at this as a workaround until we get our other system completed. I have never faced as much frustration as I have here. They have deployed systems that are to run 24/7 and collect data/ monitor interfaces and these systems are running windows 95. *ugh* I just want to scream sometimes. Again thanks for the information. I completely understand whar you are saying that its stupid to do it half-assed. But for now, I do not have much of a choice. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Duplicate calendar entries...
On the duplicate meeting items... Who else is invited? On 3/6/03 14:07, Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two problems but I believe they are really related somehow along the way -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Duplicate calendar entries... So.. Are you claiming two problems or one? On 3/6/03 13:18, Mitchell Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good afternoon, Outlook 98 Exchange 5.5 NT 4.0 SP4 I have a user that gets duplicated meeting messages, not on all meeting message but some of them. Also, this same user calendar shows these meetings and Tentative even though he does not open the meeting messages. He has a delegate but since she has reported this problem, does not open these messages. Has anyone encountered this problem? Is there a solution other than getting off of Outlook 98. Thanks. Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA config
Ok, you caught me, my 3rd step really isn't optional. Beyond that, your current understanding of how OWA works seems to be inaccurate based on the description of the process you have provided here. Even so, I fail to see how your inaccuracies would lead you to believe an OWA server installed as I described would not function for all servers in an organization where one would reasonably expect it to do so.[1] [1] Expecting it to function as an OWA server for a mailbox on machine which has a dial-up connection to the internet and is currently offline for example, would be Tysonludicrisp/Tyson.[2] [2] And would reflect a fundamental problem with the understanding of what OWA is. On 3/6/03 14:08, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its not like that. you have to install the OWA server pointing to the bridge head server. this bridge head server will in turn connect to the required server when client makes a request to access a mailbox from some other server this is the latest I heard from my principals Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA config In 5.5? It's a two step process... 1.Install OWA. 2. Stop. Optional 3rd step: Drink beer and marvel at the ease of use. On 3/6/03 11:47, Santhosh, H. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Just wanted to check if some one knows how to get the centralized OWA server configured in such a way that it serves all the exchange server in the organization is there any registry setting to indicate it Santhosh.H Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone:(330) 471-4344 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: No send on a mailbox
A prohibit send level of 0 in Exchange 5.5 = no limit. On 3/6/03 14:35, Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Exch5.5 sp4/win 2k sp3 On a mailbox is there a way to tell admin that the mailbox can reviece but not send? Other then setting the send limit to 0? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OOO to internet, still bad?
Nope. . . read again - the loop was internal. Auto-replies to the Internet were already disabled. So, that's not really an argument against OOO to the Internet, but it does serve as a reminder that users can still mess you up. Darcy -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OOO to internet, still bad? This mail loop was again a result of automatic replies/forwards to the internet being enabled. OOO responses alone would not have cause this loop. I can envision several ways in which an OOO loop alone could be created, all of them involved poorly written software and the potential of them actually happening is extremely low. On 3/5/03 13:14, Darcy Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was recently forced to enable OOO to the Internet. Our sales weasels couldn't comprehend that customers might prefer to be contacted directly by a delegate than have to send a second message to an address they got out of an OOO. Result? We saw a massive jump in spam within a week of enabling OOO to the Internet. I'm on record with my manager, the department director, the VP and the CTO as objecting to enabling OOO to the Internet for that reason among other's. Loops? Yep - you can still get them. We had an internal one when a user enabled OOO, than added a secondary reply to every message rule to his OOO. He hit an automated reply mailbox and the two exchanged unique messages until his mailbox filled up and the Send limits kicked in. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain
There's a full step-by-step in the FAQ. Works like a charm. Even though it shows for NT to NT, it also works for NT4 to 2K -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 3:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to move exchange 5.5 to a new Domain Hello everyone How do I move my exchange 5.5 on an NT box from an NT4 Domain to windows 2000 domain. As part of our migration strategy we setup a new domain to enable us change our domain name from London_city to londoncity without the underscore. This is to avoid any future DNS problems. The idea is to phase out the NT domain after moving all our servers to the new win2k domain. Thanks for your help __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] === This email and its contents are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not disclose or use the information within this email or its attachments. If you have received this email in error, please delete it immediately. Thank you. === _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OnlySystemMessagesUseCDs functionality in Exchange 2000
Hey everyone: I'm working with an organization that has 9 Exchange 5.5 sites and a bridgehead site. They use the IMS to connect the spoke sites to the hub site and directory replication occurs with the bridgehead site. However, they are using the OnlySystemMessagesUseCDs registry key on the IMSs so that regular SMTP messages route directly to the destination site rather than via the bridgehead site. They are moving to Active Directory (single forest) and Exchange 2000. Once they migrate to Exchange 2000, is there a way to accomplish this in Exchange 2000 short of creating RGCs from each of the routing groups to each of the routing groups? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Thanks much, Jim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Best practices for removing an Exchange Site / Admin Group
G'day, I am looking for a best practices document that covers removing a site/admin group from an Exchange 2000 organisation. Some background - we have a distributed environment with about 400 locations, split over about 60 Exchange sites. It was Exchange 5.5 / NT4.0, but most of the sites ( other than some in Asia ) have been migrated to Exchange 2000 SP2 / Win2K SP3. Due to reorganisation of the company, a number of the sites are going to split off to a different Exchange organisation. The migration of user data will be done by another group, but I need to be able to remove the sites from our organisation after the migration is complete. So, I am looking for a document covering best practices of removing sites from the organisation. I have looked on google and technet ( remove / decommission exchange site ), but all the entries so far have been relating to removing an Exchange server from a site, not removing a site from an org. Has anyone seen anything along these lines?? Thanks, Paul. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Best practices for removing an Exchange Site / Admin Group
Basically, once you've removed all the servers, you can remove the Admin group. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Veld, Paul Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Best practices for removing an Exchange Site / Admin Group G'day, I am looking for a best practices document that covers removing a site/admin group from an Exchange 2000 organisation. Some background - we have a distributed environment with about 400 locations, split over about 60 Exchange sites. It was Exchange 5.5 / NT4.0, but most of the sites ( other than some in Asia ) have been migrated to Exchange 2000 SP2 / Win2K SP3. Due to reorganisation of the company, a number of the sites are going to split off to a different Exchange organisation. The migration of user data will be done by another group, but I need to be able to remove the sites from our organisation after the migration is complete. So, I am looking for a document covering best practices of removing sites from the organisation. I have looked on google and technet ( remove / decommission exchange site ), but all the entries so far have been relating to removing an Exchange server from a site, not removing a site from an org. Has anyone seen anything along these lines?? Thanks, Paul. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
