Re: Tracking email use to save bandwidth
i know for sure that e-nspect does provide this level of detail. mike - Original Message - From: Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:35 PM Subject: RE: Tracking email use to save bandwidth I'm sure that information would be nice to have, but if you need that you'll have to look for other solutions. Promodag may do this, but I haven't looked at their stuff in a long time. Hunter -Original Message- From: mike dilworth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions what about attachment names, sizes, mimemtypes? all very usefull stuff mike - Original Message - From: Coleman, Hunter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:42 PM Subject: RE: Tracking email use to save bandwidth http://www.swinc.com/resource/scripts.htm Scripts there that will generate email usage reports per user, breaking out internal mail, external mail, # of messages, size of messages, etc. You'll need to have Message Tracking enabled, as was already mentioned Hunter -Original Message- From: Peter White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Hi, I hope somebody can help us out. We have Exchange 5.5 sp4 and about 100 users in three geographical locations. Our problem is that some of our users regard the company email as their own personal amusement center and frequently cc emails with large attachments to 25 or more of their personal internet email buddies. We have only a 512k internet connection and this heavy non-business email traffic slows our legitimate site-to-site communication to a crawl. I feel sure that just a few users are really abusing the system and I'd like to find out who they are. I don't want to penalize everyone in the company because of a few ignorant users who abuse the system. Can I track which users are sending attachements, how big the attachments are and how many people they are ccing to? If I can get that info I can deal with the abusers without stepping on email for everyone in the company. thanks Peter White _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA and the M:
Are you bored? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 June 2003 20:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA and the M: There is no M: drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: OWA and the M: Hi, I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for another q on the m drive...) It still seems to work ok tho Support Analyst TKC Group Ltd Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est Keynsham BS31 1TZ UK 0117 916 1320 This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of TKC Group Ltd. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please do not copy or disclose its contents. Please return it to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] then delete the email. intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. Depends on jurisdiction. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 07:10 To: Exchange Discussions Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
give yourself permissions to everyone's mailbox and start reading their mail :) -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 6:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
I'd wager that Siegfried is fully aware of the differences, probably more so than most on the list. The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I know about the hotfix and am not crazy about installing hotfixes, so we're waiting at this point. Nothing accesses the M: drive on our E2K servers, it's excluded from vscan. We don't do single folder backups and our backups run after midnight. OL2002 works sometimes here, too. Nothing is constant. I know rules fire on notes, but everything from the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't really understand the differences. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get called on, the ones with rules that stop working, mostly, and that's such a waste to have to create a mailbox when all you really need is a PF. I'd guess we got maybe 10 PF calls in the 5 years we've been running Exchange for actual problems with the server, not the usual, user doesn't understand the permissions calls, and now that we've moved our PFs to E2K, we get at least 10 calls a week with PF server issues, if not more. We've turned logging up to highest on everything to do with PFs and nothing ever shows up in the logs to give us a clue as to why they sometimes work and sometimes don't. When the forwarding rules stop working, a server restart is the only thing that fixes it. I'm really beginning to hate PFs. When I went to MEC2000, in one of the classes, they said that in E2K, you'd be able to change permissions on PFs without replacing permissions - what happened to that? Wouldn't that be helpful when you have thousands of PFs? I know, PFAdmin, which may or may not work correctly. -Original Message- From: Webb, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Sure does but I'd rather have someone elses butt on the line than mine, especially if 'm doing it for them anyway. I'm intrigued - where is phone tapping legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. Depends on jurisdiction. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 07:10 To: Exchange Discussions Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
That's why you want to make sure your company has a policy in place and that all of your staff is aware of this. You also want to get this in writing from HR and have THEM do the monitoring. You simply set it up for them, and let them have at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Sure does but I'd rather have someone elses butt on the line than mine, especially if 'm doing it for them anyway. I'm intrigued - where is phone tapping legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. Depends on jurisdiction. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 07:10 To: Exchange Discussions Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Russia? Dunno. I wasn't referring to phone taps; there are any number of situations where monitoring of email is legal without consent. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Sure does but I'd rather have someone elses butt on the line than mine, especially if 'm doing it for them anyway. I'm intrigued - where is phone tapping legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. Depends on jurisdiction. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 07:10 To: Exchange Discussions Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: .Pst on OWA?
That's why you shouldn't support OWA as a primary client for those people -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? :) No other way to let OWA users to able to drag their Server Email into their own pc.. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) That cannot work. The file is on the client, OWA runs on the server. What you are asking for is create a new client application that runs on your client computer to open your client PST file. That's not OWA any longer, that's Outlook 97/98/2000/2002/2003. Already exists and does the job opening a PST fairly well. Can you open a Word document stored on your local HD from a Web application without uploading it first? -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Siegfried.. (I knew) You can already use OWA to open somebody else's mailbox calendar or anther public folder because this data is stored on the server. (I knew) I can imagine a custom application to import a PST into the Exchanger server database using a Web browser based interface that integrates into OWA (fairly simple, works here in a simple prototype). (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) But I cannot imagine how you'd share a drive or PST to open it directly in OWA. It's just two different worlds... forget it since it cannot be done, only can imagine.. :) thanks -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. It might can work as how its work with using Outlook Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox P.Folder. Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable to open a file from within the workstation through browser is something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). Every Management in different Organization requires different thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL the items that they have SENT receive. They keep it either for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database is too big for it to keep inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is served up on the server, the server would have to know about the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls....
Hello everone, finally got the boss at a side job to scrap MS Proxy 2.0 and put a PIX 515 in. Exchange 5.5 is running on the same box as Proxy 2.0. i removed Proxy 2.0 and now OWA 5.5 does not work thru my PIX. i have a NAT translation configured for our mail server and have tcp ports 25 and 80 open on the pix for OWA. when i go to the page, i get You are not authorized to view this page HPPT 403 Forbidden error. i have Log on Locally rights on this machine and was wondering what else i should check. it was working perfectly before until i changed our Proxy out for a real firewall. Server is NT 4.0 (for now) SP 6a IIS 4.0. any help is appreciated. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar
Check for filters on your client. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar Good Morning All, Next to the Inbox icon in the Folder list view, is a blue number in parenthesis. I assume that this is some kind of indicator of unread messages. All folders have them. My question is this: Sometimes it shows that their are unread messages when I know that I have read them all. Even when i view the Inbox to look for the unread message(s), the Inbox shows no unread messages. Same with the calendarhow can I find the unread appointment? I have done F5 to refresh the screen and nothing Anyone ever seen this or has this happened to you? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 Clients Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar
OkI will...thank you. But, what would that have to do with the filters? Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar Check for filters on your client. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar Good Morning All, Next to the Inbox icon in the Folder list view, is a blue number in parenthesis. I assume that this is some kind of indicator of unread messages. All folders have them. My question is this: Sometimes it shows that their are unread messages when I know that I have read them all. Even when i view the Inbox to look for the unread message(s), the Inbox shows no unread messages. Same with the calendarhow can I find the unread appointment? I have done F5 to refresh the screen and nothing Anyone ever seen this or has this happened to you? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 Clients Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar
We had one person who set up a filter to only show read messages. If you looked at his inbox it was empty but when we cleared the filter he had 800+ unread messages that had been filtered from the view. This may or may not be related to your problem. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar OkI will...thank you. But, what would that have to do with the filters? Thanks Samantha -Original Message- From: Van Hooser, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar Check for filters on your client. -Original Message- From: Bridges, Samantha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unread Message Indicator Next To Inbox/Calendar Good Morning All, Next to the Inbox icon in the Folder list view, is a blue number in parenthesis. I assume that this is some kind of indicator of unread messages. All folders have them. My question is this: Sometimes it shows that their are unread messages when I know that I have read them all. Even when i view the Inbox to look for the unread message(s), the Inbox shows no unread messages. Same with the calendarhow can I find the unread appointment? I have done F5 to refresh the screen and nothing Anyone ever seen this or has this happened to you? Exchange 5.5 sp4 Windows 2000 Advanced Server Outlook 2000 Clients Samantha _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls....
Try this link for starters. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B326856 From: Chyka Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:04:31 -0400 Hello everone, finally got the boss at a side job to scrap MS Proxy 2.0 and put a PIX 515 in. Exchange 5.5 is running on the same box as Proxy 2.0. i removed Proxy 2.0 and now OWA 5.5 does not work thru my PIX. i have a NAT translation configured for our mail server and have tcp ports 25 and 80 open on the pix for OWA. when i go to the page, i get You are not authorized to view this page HPPT 403 Forbidden error. i have Log on Locally rights on this machine and was wondering what else i should check. it was working perfectly before until i changed our Proxy out for a real firewall. Server is NT 4.0 (for now) SP 6a IIS 4.0. any help is appreciated. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: .Pst on OWA?
Why not IMAP?? Chuck -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 10:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? :) No other way to let OWA users to able to drag their Server Email into their own pc.. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 1:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) That cannot work. The file is on the client, OWA runs on the server. What you are asking for is create a new client application that runs on your client computer to open your client PST file. That's not OWA any longer, that's Outlook 97/98/2000/2002/2003. Already exists and does the job opening a PST fairly well. Can you open a Word document stored on your local HD from a Web application without uploading it first? -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 4:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? Siegfried.. (I knew) You can already use OWA to open somebody else's mailbox calendar or anther public folder because this data is stored on the server. (I knew) I can imagine a custom application to import a PST into the Exchanger server database using a Web browser based interface that integrates into OWA (fairly simple, works here in a simple prototype). (Imagination, add a custom application integrate into OWA to open a pst file from the workstation not the exchange server :- Pst store in the workstation not exchange ) But I cannot imagine how you'd share a drive or PST to open it directly in OWA. It's just two different worlds... forget it since it cannot be done, only can imagine.. :) thanks -Original Message- From: Fioon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? I've though of that b4, I thought the new version is so powerful.. It might can work as how its work with using Outlook Properties with Exchange Server (Intranet) to open Mailbox P.Folder. Browse OWA through IE or etc is just only a browser, enable to open a file from within the workstation through browser is something that i can imagine (of coz,just imagine). Every Management in different Organization requires different thing. In my side, others country staff is using our Exchange Email. Hence they can only manage to open with either email through POP3 or OWA. I would stress to disable POP3. Their only choice left is to open with OWA. They needs to save ALL the items that they have SENT receive. They keep it either for an evidence or for information. No choice, their database is too big for it to keep inside the server. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 3:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: .Pst on OWA? So how do you think that would work, exactly? Since OWA is served up on the server, the server would have to know about the PST. But the PST is usually on the workstation. So would you share the drive your PST is on so the server could read it? Sometimes just a little thought helps before asking a question. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fioon Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 1:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: .Pst on OWA? Anyone knows that can OWA in 2k or 2k3 able to open .pst? Decide to close POP3, it will have problem on limited mailbox space. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Operation failed when accessing Public Folder
Hi, I've been having a problem with one of my Public folders. I have it setup to be used for contacts. Occationally I will get the Operation failed error message when clicking on the letter tabs on the right hand side of the Outlook window. I cannot reproduce the issue at will and the users that use the folder are getting a little upset. Once I have them close Outlook and open it up again they are fine I have them running on Outlook 2000 and Exchange 2000 SP3. Is there a way that I can check the integrity of the contacts? Thanks, Darrin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GroupWise Migration - calendar items fail
We've just started to migrate users from GW to Exchange and some users fail on calendar items and notes (which are migrated as an all day appointment). GW notes are different from Exchange notes. We have not yet figured out what kind of calendar items. Anyone else run into this who can tell me where to look? Thanks, Debbie _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitor Email content
not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
In some states of the US that is true. In others you must provide due notice. In some cases even a logon warning is recommended. Otherwise the company can be liable for civil action. Email does not actually fall in to the wiretapping statutes, I don't think anyway. For wiretapping, it is different. In fact, in some states, even cameras and baby monitors can be used with no notice. The defining rule on that is whether it is recorded or not. If it is not recorded, it does not fall in to the wiretap or communications laws. Best Regards, Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:38 To: Exchange Discussions not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: Monitor Email content
The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. **
RE: Monitor Email content
I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors
RE: Monitor Email content
Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is
RE: Monitor Email content
First off, anyone who lets a manager dictate reading emails is a fool. This type of stuff has to come from the top down. As an example here, any email monitoring has to be approved by the CEO, who in turn passes it on to HR, then to me. At that point I do the configuration and then let whoever needs it, at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by
RE: Monitor Email content
Which happens to be broadly similar to our policy here; coincidentally, I'm rewriting the operating procedure for this today anyway, and we're going to require the signoff of a local HR representative, and a line manager. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:00 To: Exchange Discussions First off, anyone who lets a manager dictate reading emails is a fool. This type of stuff has to come from the top down. As an example here, any email monitoring has to be approved by the CEO, who in turn passes it on to HR, then to me. At that point I do the configuration and then let whoever needs it, at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Monitor Email content
Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang
RE: Monitor Email content
yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
LOL. I nearly became a lawyer in my younger days and I just miss it. Now let's see - how's that restore coming along? -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Monitor Email content
I've just spent the last couple of months doing this so I guess it's all still buzzing round. Apologies. We also elected for minimum HR and line manager approval. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which happens to be broadly similar to our policy here; coincidentally, I'm rewriting the operating procedure for this today anyway, and we're going to require the signoff of a local HR representative, and a line manager. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:00 To: Exchange Discussions First off, anyone who lets a manager dictate reading emails is a fool. This type of stuff has to come from the top down. As an example here, any email monitoring has to be approved by the CEO, who in turn passes it on to HR, then to me. At that point I do the configuration and then let whoever needs it, at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Message 451 4.4.2 Bad connection (connection reset)
Are you tied into any of the RBL's, in addition to using the Vamsoft Open Relay Filter? If so, that's probably why, as hanafos.com is on the FiveTen RBL. Can you add the domain name to the white-list, instead of the IP addy? By the entire IP range...not to be checked, what range are you talking about? This is what I get from NSlookup: hanafos.com MX preference = 10, mail exchanger = mhr.hanafos.com hanafos.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = mhr01.hanafos.com hanafos.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = mhr02.hanafos.com hanafos.com MX preference = 50, mail exchanger = mhr03.hanafos.com mhr01.hanafos.com internet address = 211.202.13.156 mhr02.hanafos.com internet address = 211.202.13.157 mhr03.hanafos.com internet address = 211.202.13.158 -Original Message- From: Freddie Soerensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Hostmaster Subject: Message 451 4.4.2 Bad connection (connection reset) Hi list We have a problem which we have been struggling with for a couple of weeks now, hope somebody here can help. We have E2k SP3 on Win2k SP3 with all patches. We can send email to everywhere in the world and we can receive from everywhere in the world, except from the domain hanafos.com (211.202.13.0 - 211.202.13.255). Whenever they try to send us an email they get following message : == FIRST : Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:11:56 KST +0900 LAST : Fri, 20 Jun 2003 19:32:02 KST +0900 RETRY COUNT : 3 LOOP COUNT : 0 REMOTE SERVER RESPONSE : 451 4.4.2 Bad connection (connection reset) == This IP range is not blocked in the Connection control of the virtual SMTP server and we are not performing reverse DNS lookup on incoming connections. We are using Vamsoft Open Relay Filter and we have added the entire IP Range to the IP ranges not to be checked. Funny thing is that f.ex mo02.hanafos.com (211.202.13.144) does not have reverse DNS so maybe this could still be the problem ? Does anybody know how to find out or how to solve this issue. It is really driving us crazy Thanks in advance Freddie -- Freddie Soerensen Conares Metal Supply Limited Tel : +423 235 5040 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.conares.com There are three kinds of death in this world. There's heart death, there's brain death, and there's being off the network. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Yawn? Maybe to you, but anytime you want to come out and play with the big boys, pal, this is exactly the kind of issue that has to be addressed. Hit the delete key, or sod off, I don't much care which - this is on topic, and being discussed in a perfectly reasonable manner. You're with an outsourcing company. I'll assume you don't take that pissant attitude to your client sites. -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request.
RE: Monitor Email content
Mmm. One of the potentials that I worked us around was avoiding a local manager and a local HR person working together to bypass the procedure. Excessively paranoid, perhaps, but hey - that's what I'm paid for. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions I've just spent the last couple of months doing this so I guess it's all still buzzing round. Apologies. We also elected for minimum HR and line manager approval. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which happens to be broadly similar to our policy here; coincidentally, I'm rewriting the operating procedure for this today anyway, and we're going to require the signoff of a local HR representative, and a line manager. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:00 To: Exchange Discussions First off, anyone who lets a manager dictate reading emails is a fool. This type of stuff has to come from the top down. As an example here, any email monitoring has to be approved by the CEO, who in turn passes it on to HR, then to me. At that point I do the configuration and then let whoever needs it, at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request.
RE: Monitor Email content
Nice one, a man with a sense of humour... -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:22 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Yawn? Maybe to you, but anytime you want to come out and play with the big boys, pal, this is exactly the kind of issue that has to be addressed. Hit the delete key, or sod off, I don't much care which - this is on topic, and being discussed in a perfectly reasonable manner. You're with an outsourcing company. I'll assume you don't take that pissant attitude to your client sites. -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:11 To: Exchange Discussions yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors
RE: Weird PF issue
I'm assuming this is an issue, only if the person has the NAV Corporate Edition client email plug-in for Outlook installed. We have this version of the client installed on our desktops, but without the Outlook plugin and have experienced zero problems to date. -Original Message- From: Hutchins, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Weird PF issue Does she have read only permissions to the items she cannot open? Are you Running Norton Corp Edition pre-v8.x? Try this one out if so.. http://tinyurl.com/f1dp -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions One of our Exchange 2000 SP3 uses can't open some items in a public folder. When she double-clicks on the message, she gets Access Denied error pop-up. Yet she can open other items in that same public folder. When I give myself rights to her mailbox and create a profile on my machine to access her mailbox, I don't encounter any problems like that. We even logged on with her Windows account on a PC here and configured her Outlook profile and still could not reproduce the bad behavior. It efinitely seems to be something wrong on her PC, but what could it be? (we already did /cleanviews on her PC - didn't help) Thanks for any ideas in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3D3Dexchangetext_mo d= e =3D3D=3D lang=3D3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? Exactly my thoughts. I'm going to run some tests with RC1 to see if it is included there and post back here. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I'd wager that Siegfried is fully aware of the differences, probably more so than most on the list. The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I know about the hotfix and am not crazy about installing hotfixes, so we're waiting at this point. Nothing accesses the M: drive on our E2K servers, it's excluded from vscan. We don't do single folder backups and our backups run after midnight. OL2002 works sometimes here, too. Nothing is constant. I know rules fire on notes, but everything from the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't really understand the differences. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get called on, the ones with rules that stop working, mostly, and that's such a waste to have to create a mailbox when all you really need is a PF. I'd guess we got maybe 10 PF calls in the 5 years we've been running Exchange for actual problems with the server, not the usual, user doesn't understand the permissions calls, and now that we've moved our PFs to E2K,
RE: Monitor Email content
Ha. Now I can see where you got it depends from! The assumption we accepted was that the line manager should know what her subordinates were doing and the HR person would ensure that it was business related. The initial request was from business manager to HR and needed sanction was required from senior person with work delegated to junior HR. If it was of a personnal nature as opposed to business related then senior HRs would be investigating with higher level managers approval. Exchange admin just there to ensure process was followed before providing access in controlled and auditable manner. If collusion was suspected I guess there would be sufficient evidence both electronic and paper to back track. Didn't write that in though. I'll put a little note aside for next time. Richard - wake up. It's time to go home. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:23 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Mmm. One of the potentials that I worked us around was avoiding a local manager and a local HR person working together to bypass the procedure. Excessively paranoid, perhaps, but hey - that's what I'm paid for. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:19 To: Exchange Discussions I've just spent the last couple of months doing this so I guess it's all still buzzing round. Apologies. We also elected for minimum HR and line manager approval. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which happens to be broadly similar to our policy here; coincidentally, I'm rewriting the operating procedure for this today anyway, and we're going to require the signoff of a local HR representative, and a line manager. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:00 To: Exchange Discussions First off, anyone who lets a manager dictate reading emails is a fool. This type of stuff has to come from the top down. As an example here, any email monitoring has to be approved by the CEO, who in turn passes it on to HR, then to me. At that point I do the configuration and then let whoever needs it, at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: Monitor Email content
We are so happy that you've recovered from your bout of insanity. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Monitor Email content Subject: RE: Monitor Email content LOL. I nearly became a lawyer in my younger days and I just miss it. Now let's see - how's that restore coming along? -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission.
RE: IIS log Files with wrong date??
I'm assuming we were all just kidding... -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? Assuming you're not kidding, UTC is the same as GMT is the same as Zulu Time. The UK is currently at GMT/UTC+1. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions I thought they were in Universal Coordinated Time. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? UTC's French. GMT'll do g -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 17:45 To: Exchange Discussions I thought they were in UTC. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IIS log Files with wrong date?? IIS Log times are in GMT -Original Message- From: Matt Plahtinsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 11:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IIS log Files with wrong date?? W2K Sp3, E2K Sp3 -- only one exchange server. I setup OWA and im trying to trouble shoot a problem. Enabled IIS logging and the time in the logs do not match the actual time. Example I log into OWA at 14:00 and my logs say that I did at 18:00. Any ideas? My system time is correct, My DC time is correct, the computer that im logging into OWA with time is correct. Looked on technet for wrong log time with IIS and haven't found anything useful yet. I'm sure its some newbie thing ive over looked. Thanks for any input Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls....
Tony, that did it...i must have missed that article, i had the one for 2000.thanks for the help! -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls Try this link for starters. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B326856 From: Chyka Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:04:31 -0400 Hello everone, finally got the boss at a side job to scrap MS Proxy 2.0 and put a PIX 515 in. Exchange 5.5 is running on the same box as Proxy 2.0. i removed Proxy 2.0 and now OWA 5.5 does not work thru my PIX. i have a NAT translation configured for our mail server and have tcp ports 25 and 80 open on the pix for OWA. when i go to the page, i get You are not authorized to view this page HPPT 403 Forbidden error. i have Log on Locally rights on this machine and was wondering what else i should check. it was working perfectly before until i changed our Proxy out for a real firewall. Server is NT 4.0 (for now) SP 6a IIS 4.0. any help is appreciated. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
That's a situation which needs to be governed by corproate policies, not the law. If either HR or a person's manager asks for access to a mailbox, they are granted that access. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any
RE: Monitor Email content
Um, whereas I'm considering studying law now just for the hell of it... -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:43 To: Exchange Discussions We are so happy that you've recovered from your bout of insanity. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Monitor Email content Subject: RE: Monitor Email content LOL. I nearly became a lawyer in my younger days and I just miss it. Now let's see - how's that restore coming along? -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company
RE: Monitor Email content
I agree, and then when an authorized spy (that is, with a signed letter from the CEO) wants to read someone's mailbox, restore a copy from a backup onto your recovery server, set up Outlook on a machine in a locked room, and let the spy have access to it there. Resist the urge to do the spying yourself; to a very large extent it's incompatible with one's role as an administrator. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content That's why you want to make sure your company has a policy in place and that all of your staff is aware of this. You also want to get this in writing from HR and have THEM do the monitoring. You simply set it up for them, and let them have at it. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Sure does but I'd rather have someone elses butt on the line than mine, especially if 'm doing it for them anyway. I'm intrigued - where is phone tapping legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 12:39 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. Depends on jurisdiction. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 07:10 To: Exchange Discussions Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or
RE: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls....
No problem always trying to help others as they have helped me on this list. From: Chyka Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 13:31:11 -0400 Tony, that did it...i must have missed that article, i had the one for 2000.thanks for the help! -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls Try this link for starters. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B326856 From: Chyka Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Help with OWA 5.5 after changing firewalls Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:04:31 -0400 Hello everone, finally got the boss at a side job to scrap MS Proxy 2.0 and put a PIX 515 in. Exchange 5.5 is running on the same box as Proxy 2.0. i removed Proxy 2.0 and now OWA 5.5 does not work thru my PIX. i have a NAT translation configured for our mail server and have tcp ports 25 and 80 open on the pix for OWA. when i go to the page, i get You are not authorized to view this page HPPT 403 Forbidden error. i have Log on Locally rights on this machine and was wondering what else i should check. it was working perfectly before until i changed our Proxy out for a real firewall. Server is NT 4.0 (for now) SP 6a IIS 4.0. any help is appreciated. Bob C. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
You play one in your own mind. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
I've considered becoming a lawyer because I could then criticize lawyers with standing. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Um, whereas I'm considering studying law now just for the hell of it... -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:43 To: Exchange Discussions We are so happy that you've recovered from your bout of insanity. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Monitor Email content Subject: RE: Monitor Email content LOL. I nearly became a lawyer in my younger days and I just miss it. Now let's see - how's that restore coming along? -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the
RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post
Thank you for the info. -Original Message- From: Dave Mills [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:24 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post I just tested this fix, and it didn't appear to work at first when using the instructions described in the article, but after a short call with PSS I got it working. Once you've applied the fix, instead of setting the Incoming value to 0, you have to create a value called Incoming Defaults To IPM.Note and set it to 1 and then restart the store. - Dave - Original Message - From: Dryden, Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:13 AM Subject: RE: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Can someone else please try this so that we don't have to be the first one? Just kidding. Has anyone tried this yet? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 4:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Exchange2000] Possible hotfix for SMTP mail to public folders as IPM.Note not IPM.Post Just came across KB article 817809 dated May 24 which sounds like MS may have listened to our complaints about the change at E2K on the format that SMTP mail is delivered to a Public Folder. I do not recall seeing this hotfix mentioned on this list so I thought I'd post a note about it. We have many 5.5 Public Folders that receive SMTP mail and are not looking forward to the impacts of the change in E2K. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb%3Ben-us%3B817809 Per the article (update requires Exchange 2000 SP3): After you install this update, incoming messages to public folders have their message class cached to IPM.Note instead of IPM.Post. You can configure this new setting by creating the Incoming registry value in the following registry subkey: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\MSExchan ge IS\ ServerName\Public-GUID Value name: Incoming Value type: DWORD Value data: 0 defaults to IPM.Note. A DWORD value of 0 (zero) is default (false). A non-zero value (true) configures the public folder to cache incoming messages as IPM.Post . I'm just not clear on what they mean by the term cache. I just saw the article and have not obtained the hotfix yet to test it. Our Exchange 2000 is still only in our lab. If any of you try it out first, let us know the results. Jane [EMAIL PROTECTED] Postmaster Team Tektronix, Inc. Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor -~-- Looking for the latest Free IT White Papers? Visit SearchMobileComputing.com to access over 500 white papers. Get instant access at SearchMobileComputing.com Today http://us.click.yahoo.com/ZyjvfD/PLNGAA/uitMAA/eJp0lB/TM -~- Post message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange 2000 FAQ: http://www.exchange-mail.org/faq.html Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
Are you a good one at least? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content You play one in your own mind. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Monitor Email content
Only if he stays awake long enough to try the case. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Avi Smith-Rapaport [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you a good one at least? -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content You play one in your own mind. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
Re: Monitor Email content
Of course you do. You live in LA after all. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
You'd be best off consulting an attorney for your jurisdiction before you go with that idea. In some jurisdictions that approach could get you in a lot of trouble. Trust me (see sig block). Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-OneNote, CNA, MCPx4 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Follow up: doesn't look like it included in Exchange 2003 RC1. Tried it and it is still IPM.Post... -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? Exactly my thoughts. I'm going to run some tests with RC1 to see if it is included there and post back here. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I'd wager that Siegfried is fully aware of the differences, probably more so than most on the list. The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I know about the hotfix and am not crazy about installing hotfixes, so we're waiting at this point. Nothing accesses the M: drive on our E2K servers, it's excluded from vscan. We don't do single folder backups and our backups run after midnight. OL2002 works sometimes here, too. Nothing is constant. I know rules fire on notes, but everything from the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't really understand the differences. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can make whatever changes an owner should be able to make. Searching for something in PFs used to be a breeze when they were on our 5.5 servers, now, you may or may not find what you're looking for even though you know it's in there. We're getting to the point that it would be easier to create mailboxes for the PFs that we constantly get
PFINFO question
Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lotus Group members
Are there any dirsync tools available to help export Lotus Notes groups with members into AD? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Lotus Group members
Look on MS's site. There are some third party ones there If I remember right besides what MS offers From: Wade Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lotus Group members Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 16:09:42 -0400 Are there any dirsync tools available to help export Lotus Notes groups with members into AD? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
I once flew on the same plane as Michael Tucker. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content Of course you do. You live in LA after all. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential to the intended recipient(s). If you have received the e-mail in error please notify the author by replying to this e-mail and delete it and all copies from your system. Any unauthorised disclosure, use, or dissemination, either whole or partial, is prohibited. Any views or opinions contained in this email are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by The Company, and The Company cannot be held responsible for any misuse. The Company does not accept responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising in any way from its receipt or use or for any errors or omissions in its contents, which may arise as a result of its transmission. This email is covered by The Company Terms and Conditions of Business, a copy of which can be obtained on request. ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Recipient Policy
Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
Did you dance around the hat chanting incantations first? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Siegfried Weber Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Follow up: doesn't look like it included in Exchange 2003 RC1. Tried it and it is still IPM.Post... -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? Exactly my thoughts. I'm going to run some tests with RC1 to see if it is included there and post back here. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I'd wager that Siegfried is fully aware of the differences, probably more so than most on the list. The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I know about the hotfix and am not crazy about installing hotfixes, so we're waiting at this point. Nothing accesses the M: drive on our E2K servers, it's excluded from vscan. We don't do single folder backups and our backups run after midnight. OL2002 works sometimes here, too. Nothing is constant. I know rules fire on notes, but everything from the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't really understand the differences. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are finally cleaned up so that Exchange 2000 can interpret them. We only have replicas on one of our 2000 servers now since replication caused too much latency. Sometimes, even though we have owner permissions on all of the PFs, if we use Outlook 2002 to view the properties, we're told we don't have permission, but if we view them in OL2000, we can
RE: Recipient Policy
Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
I sacrificed a chicken. Still no go... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Did you dance around the hat chanting incantations first? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Siegfried Weber Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Follow up: doesn't look like it included in Exchange 2003 RC1. Tried it and it is still IPM.Post... -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? Exactly my thoughts. I'm going to run some tests with RC1 to see if it is included there and post back here. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I'd wager that Siegfried is fully aware of the differences, probably more so than most on the list. The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I know about the hotfix and am not crazy about installing hotfixes, so we're waiting at this point. Nothing accesses the M: drive on our E2K servers, it's excluded from vscan. We don't do single folder backups and our backups run after midnight. OL2002 works sometimes here, too. Nothing is constant. I know rules fire on notes, but everything from the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't really understand the differences. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working intermittently. The PFs that receive mostly outside mail are now posts, so the rules don't work at all on those anymore. The user role permissions are
DL for internal use only
Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
The RUS is responsible for stamping the address on the user object. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL for internal use only
Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
do you have any duplicate SMTP addresses in your org? they have been known to trip RUS. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
We've tried moving the RUS to another domain controller and telling it to update now, rebuild and it still isn't putting the stamp there. Is there a service we could stop that would stop and restart this service. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy The RUS is responsible for stamping the address on the user object. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
I experienced this issue where there was a mailbox associated with a disabled user account object... Is that the case here? -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Recipient Policy Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
We have a TON of disabled user accounts out there with mailboxes.!! I bet that is the issue! Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I experienced this issue where there was a mailbox associated with a disabled user account object... Is that the case here? -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Recipient Policy Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
that's a property that gets whacked when a user is disabled. You can re-instate that property by adding SELF back to the mailbox permissions with the Full Mailbox Access and Associated External Account rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Monitor Email content
I used to live just up the street from April Hunter. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:23 PM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I once flew on the same plane as Michael Tucker. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content Of course you do. You live in LA after all. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:08 PM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content I'm not an attorney, but I play one on TV -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Are you an attorney? You might want to be careful dispensing legal advice if you are not. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris H Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 8:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Recipient Policy
No. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy We've tried moving the RUS to another domain controller and telling it to update now, rebuild and it still isn't putting the stamp there. Is there a service we could stop that would stop and restart this service. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy The RUS is responsible for stamping the address on the user object. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL for internal use only
Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL for internal use only
Yes, but it makes upgrading to E2K a bit more problematic. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL for internal use only
We're doing this soon - why so? Thanks Stu -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Yes, but it makes upgrading to E2K a bit more problematic. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
I'm sorry if this is kind of elementary but I don't see where to do this in the account properties in AD?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy that's a property that gets whacked when a user is disabled. You can re-instate that property by adding SELF back to the mailbox permissions with the Full Mailbox Access and Associated External Account rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
Exchange Advanced Tab, Mailbox Rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I'm sorry if this is kind of elementary but I don't see where to do this in the account properties in AD?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy that's a property that gets whacked when a user is disabled. You can re-instate that property by adding SELF back to the mailbox permissions with the Full Mailbox Access and Associated External Account rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DL for internal use only
Or remove the SMTP address in Exchange 5.5 ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:43 PM Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DL for internal use only
True about that .. so skip my response from a few seconds ago :) ** Please prefix your subject header with BETA for posts dealing with Exchange 2003 ** -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:02 PM Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Yes, but it makes upgrading to E2K a bit more problematic. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
I am most concerned with one site that has about 2 public folders. All of the folders are on 2 servers and I have confirmed my access to that site. I do not have a mailbox in that site, howerver. I know it asks for a profile for the mapi connection but I know I can traverse sites...so I should not be having issues??? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:
Re: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note
A goat siggi .. no chicken .. - Original Message - From: Siegfried Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:41 PM Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I sacrificed a chicken. Still no go... -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Did you dance around the hat chanting incantations first? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Siegfried Weber Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note Follow up: doesn't look like it included in Exchange 2003 RC1. Tried it and it is still IPM.Post... -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 6:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? Exactly my thoughts. I'm going to run some tests with RC1 to see if it is included there and post back here. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I'd wager that Siegfried is fully aware of the differences, probably more so than most on the list. The question I have is what's the status of this hotfix with regards to E2k3? Is there an expectation that this functionality will be included in the RTM release? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 7:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note I know about the hotfix and am not crazy about installing hotfixes, so we're waiting at this point. Nothing accesses the M: drive on our E2K servers, it's excluded from vscan. We don't do single folder backups and our backups run after midnight. OL2002 works sometimes here, too. Nothing is constant. I know rules fire on notes, but everything from the internet comes into PF as posts. Some of our rules just stop working at times, though, on notes with nothing in the logs and with logging turned up to max. If you've never had a lot of PFs in 5.5 and now you've gone to E2K, you can't really understand the differences. -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note As for being posts instead of notes, see Andy's reply and call Microsoft for a free of charge fix. I've never used rules much on PF's hence I cannot comment on that. I do understand that a rule doesn't fire if it is a post item but it should fire on a note item. I'd be interested to hear if you have any additional info what's going on. Especially if the store is hit by other applications like a MAPI based backup (single folder backup thingy maybe?) or an antivirus scanner (either MAPI or ESE/VSAPI based)? Also, you do know that you should stay away from the M: Drive, don't you? The symptoms (like the permissions issue - I just tested with Outlook 2002 SP2 and it works here) you describe point me into the direction that you are running some piece of software which accesses the M: Drive (like a file based backup or AV scanner) and causes some of your grief. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / Development Lead, CDOLive LLC - The Microsoft Messaging and Collaboration Application Experts http://www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 12:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IPM.Post VS. IPM.Note That's too bad. We have thousands of PFs and have always encouraged people to opt for a PF rather than a mailbox anytime they need somewhere to receive email to be viewed by people who already had a mailbox. In 5.5, PFs worked pretty much flawlessly. In 2000, they're terrible. The rules just stop working
RE: Recipient Policy
Even our users that aren't disabled don't have the Associated External Account rights, and SELF was already checked. What is the best way to disable a user if just disabling them in AD causes this problem? Should we also reassociate the mailbox with another account? What do you people do for this type of situation? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Exchange Advanced Tab, Mailbox Rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I'm sorry if this is kind of elementary but I don't see where to do this in the account properties in AD?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy that's a property that gets whacked when a user is disabled. You can re-instate that property by adding SELF back to the mailbox permissions with the Full Mailbox Access and Associated External Account rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Monitor Email content
hehehe... Yahoo thought this email from Ed was spam... --- Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've considered becoming a lawyer because I could then criticize lawyers with standing. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Slinger, Gary Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Um, whereas I'm considering studying law now just for the hell of it... -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:43 To: Exchange Discussions We are so happy that you've recovered from your bout of insanity. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Monitor Email content Subject: RE: Monitor Email content LOL. I nearly became a lawyer in my younger days and I just miss it. Now let's see - how's that restore coming along? -Original Message- From: Henderson Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 16:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content yawn -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 17:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Which is exactly where a defined policy comes into play. To be able to read someone else's email the company must have an agreed policy in place whether or not the end user knows about it. That's the only way you can tell whether you are being asked to do something which you should do without contravening your terms of employment. -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Florida if you want a US location; England if you prefer the other side of the pond - DEPENDING on the chain-of-command structure for the given company. And a few other things. It depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:55 To: Exchange Discussions I'm not confusing my opinion with established law. Give me an example of anywhere in the world where the scenario I outlined below would be legal? -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:51 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Monitor Email content The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. Don't confuse your opinion with established law. This is a whole mess of it depends. -Original Message- From: Midgley, Ian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 11:46 To: Exchange Discussions Wow. So if a manager comes to me (Exchange admin) coz she dating a bloke in the typing pool and suspects he's two timing her and asks if she can read all his mail then it's ok for me to let her? Can I read his emails at the same time? What's my defence when he files a claim against me for emotional trauma when both his girl friends dump him? I just don't want to go there. The emails might be the companies property but who is allowed to read them is a different thing altogether. -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 23 June 2003 15:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Monitor Email content not in the US . . . courts ruled a while ago that email is company property. A policy is good if you want to be *nice* but it is not required to read employee email . . . - Original Message - From: Midgley, Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 7:10 AM Subject: RE: Monitor Email content Before you start looking at your users mail ensure that you have an email policy defined and that all your companies employees know what it is. Otherwise, you personally can be held responsible for invading someones privacy. Like with tapping phones you have to have reasonable grounds to do this sort of thing. -Original Message- From: Terry Hines [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 June 2003 22:36 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Monitor Email content I have been tasked with reviewing the content of employee email. What is the best method? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang ===
RE: PFINFO question
You'd have nothing to lose with a mailbox - mapi connection direct to that site. Esp. with 20,000 public folders, that's one big ACL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question I am most concerned with one site that has about 2 public folders. All of the folders are on 2 servers and I have confirmed my access to that site. I do not have a mailbox in that site, howerver. I know it asks for a profile for the mapi connection but I know I can traverse sites...so I should not be having issues??? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: PFINFO question
That one is the bulk of the PF's for that Org and I have confirmed that I am SA in all of the Sites that house PF's. You are probably correct in that I should create a mailbox on the site that has the most of the folders, but I still should not be having a problem...I know that I had a guy run it from that site and he got quite a few errors as well. I am really interested in finding what is causing the problem. Does anyone else have any suggestions? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question You'd have nothing to lose with a mailbox - mapi connection direct to that site. Esp. with 20,000 public folders, that's one big ACL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question I am most concerned with one site that has about 2 public folders. All of the folders are on 2 servers and I have confirmed my access to that site. I do not have a mailbox in that site, howerver. I know it asks for a profile for the mapi connection but I know I can traverse sites...so I should not be having issues??? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFINFO question
What does the app log say on that target server in that site? Does it moan about permissions at all? Are these folders replicated to other sites and do you get the same problems for those folders in other sites? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:35 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question That one is the bulk of the PF's for that Org and I have confirmed that I am SA in all of the Sites that house PF's. You are probably correct in that I should create a mailbox on the site that has the most of the folders, but I still should not be having a problem...I know that I had a guy run it from that site and he got quite a few errors as well. I am really interested in finding what is causing the problem. Does anyone else have any suggestions? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question You'd have nothing to lose with a mailbox - mapi connection direct to that site. Esp. with 20,000 public folders, that's one big ACL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 22:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question I am most concerned with one site that has about 2 public folders. All of the folders are on 2 servers and I have confirmed my access to that site. I do not have a mailbox in that site, howerver. I know it asks for a profile for the mapi connection but I know I can traverse sites...so I should not be having issues??? -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question How many sites? Would it be a big job to try and connect to at least one server in each site to check the permissions of the account you are using? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:50 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question No, we are trying to do a cleanup and I have to put together documentation on what we have before migrating to Ex2000. We have a custom coded application that will do 1way or 2 way syncs until the migration is complete. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Are you doing this to get all the permissions and then to import it again into another org or and upgrade of you 5.5 org? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:37 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Yes it is -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Is this Org completley 5.5? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 21:13 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: PFINFO question Errors are logged in the PFINFO.log preceded by getting folder properties: Error E_FAIL - Unknown Failure... Yes I saw that article, but I don't think that is my problem...I did see the one on Address book views, and I did have Outlook Address Book in the profile. I am rerunning it right now to see if that is my problem. I know it recommends running in each Site but that would be a major pain since there I have so many Sites. Does anyone know what the minimum is for permissions to run PFINFO though. It says in the readme that you must be Service Account Admin, but it does not specify where they need to be set. I will have trouble getting access to the Org if I need that. -Original Message- From: knighTslayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: PFINFO question Have you seen this article: http://support.microsoft.com/?scid=328880 What errors exactly are you getting? k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hatley, Ken Sent: 23 June 2003 20:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFINFO question Does anyone know exactly what permissions are needed to run PFINFO without logging any errors. I am running it on a international org with multiple sites...I am SA admin on all of the sites and configs that contain PF servers but I am still getting thousands of errors. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe:
Exchange 2000 Domino R5
All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Domino R5
You need a lotus notes directory connector I guess. http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/interop/NotesConnector.asp k -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ronk Sent: 23 June 2003 22:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Domino R5 All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: DL for internal use only
Because all objects in E2K must have an SMTP address. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:04 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: RE: DL for internal use only We're doing this soon - why so? Thanks Stu -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Yes, but it makes upgrading to E2K a bit more problematic. -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Can't you just remove the SMTP address? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: DL for internal use only Change the SMTP address of the DL to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: BW Brandt Ward (5320) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:44 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: DL for internal use only Subject: DL for internal use only Is there a way under Exchange 5.5 to have a DL which only works for people in the org and will not work when coming from the outside world? My management doesn't want a certain DL to be used from an outside source...like an ex-employee for example...they need it to work for the people in the office or those connected via vpn but not from the outside. Thanks, b _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Domino R5
I had a customer who had Lotus Notes in-house and we hosted Exchange 2000 for them. They had 150 users on Exchange and a bunch more on LN. They also had an NT Mail server in-house (Gordano NT Mail). MX records were pointing to NT Mail server. NT Mail server had a routing table which defined the Exchange users, if a message came to an Exchange user - it was relayed to our Exchange environment. Otherwise it was given to LN. On Exchange side, we had a recipient policy for their domain name with the option UNselected this Exchange organization is responsible for all mail delivery to this address. And we had an SMTP connector with their domain name in the Address Space and it pointed to their NT Mail server. The way all this worked - if Exchange finds an SMTP address locally, it keeps the message. If it does not - it shoots it to NT Mail. I think we also defined that NTMail server as a smart host in the properties of the Default SMTP Virtual Server. There was no GAL synchronization. They just sent mail to each other by typing their SMTP addresses. I guess for more $$$ we could have put together some kind of dir synch. -Original Message- From: Ronk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Domino R5 All I bringing up a new Exchange 2k server to replace my Notes server but am having a issue with my boss. He wants to keep both systems alive and running together with the same email addresses ands same domain name. He wants to just migrate a few people at a time into the new exchange server, while the others stay on Notes until it is time for their move. I am not sure how to approach this?? I know that I can't use the same MX record that we have for the notes server because it will not know what server to go to. We have a domain name of mile-high.com and email addresses are [EMAIL PROTECTED], he wants to keep the same addressing for the email. I am able to send to the outside world with the new exchange account but can't receive from the outside. Can anyone point me in the right direction ?? I know I could use a notes connector but seems like alot of wasted time when the server is going to go away. Any Ideas are appreciated. Thanks In Advance Ronk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
in AD Users and Computers do View-Advanced -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I'm sorry if this is kind of elementary but I don't see where to do this in the account properties in AD?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy that's a property that gets whacked when a user is disabled. You can re-instate that property by adding SELF back to the mailbox permissions with the Full Mailbox Access and Associated External Account rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Recipient Policy
After you disable a user, go to the Mailbox Rights and bring back SELF. Then mailbox will start accepting mail and you will be able to allow others to view the mailbox. Without SELF, mailbox will not accept mail (mail will bounce) and others will not be able to view the mailbox contents despite having Full Mailbox Access rights. There is a Q article somewhere about this. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Even our users that aren't disabled don't have the Associated External Account rights, and SELF was already checked. What is the best way to disable a user if just disabling them in AD causes this problem? Should we also reassociate the mailbox with another account? What do you people do for this type of situation? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dryden, Karen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Exchange Advanced Tab, Mailbox Rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy I'm sorry if this is kind of elementary but I don't see where to do this in the account properties in AD?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy that's a property that gets whacked when a user is disabled. You can re-instate that property by adding SELF back to the mailbox permissions with the Full Mailbox Access and Associated External Account rights. -Original Message- From: Patrick Scribner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Not for the new accounts that aren't replicating. But I do see this error in there. Failed to read attribute msExchUserAccountControl from Active Directory for /o=Westwood/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=dcook. Event ID 9562 which I've looked for in Technet and don't see anything for. Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Recipient Policy Is there anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Patrick Scribner Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policy Hey guys we're having a problem here that has become very frustrating -- When we add a new user the email addresses are not being populated. It seems that the recipient policy is not being applied. This is using the default policy, win2k domain, exchange 6 SP3. I have tried moving the recipient update service to another domain controller with no luck. any ideas?? Thanks, Patrick Scribner, MCSE DBA Westwood College 303-426-7000 x764 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
