Re: getting heaps of spams
gfi . . . good product. .. . bad support. Trend = restful sleep every night. - Original Message - From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:29 PM Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams What is your opinion on gfi? many thanks --- Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like you in need of a spam solution. From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:16:15 -0800 (PST) Ed, thanks for your response. Getting spams on my exchange is a daily retual to me, however, not as much as 4000 or more spam emails withing the hour. Last time, when i had such a high volume of spam, we had a look at \\exchange server\tracking.log and figured out that one of the exchange server within the enterprise had open for relaying. I can't remember now how we worked it out then, but probably experienced heaps of entries from the spamming exchange server. Hope i am making sense. --- Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can be completely relay secure yet get bombarded with spam. All Exchange servers will let spam through. Looking at the Internet headers of each message will show the stamps of the servers which handled the message. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: getting heaps of spams i have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on win 2k sp4. We have number of exchanges around the globe that has trusts between them. I am currently getting tens of thausands of spam email, however my exchange is tested and has no relying problem. I am expecting one of the exchange servers within the global enterprise is open to relying. Can someone tell me how i can check which exchange server letting all these spam email to drain to my server? thank you all in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 http://search.yahoo.com/top2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Expand your wine savvy - and get some great new recipes - at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: outsource!?
Also you might want to look at IBM solutions performance as a Co. I have heard some bad things about a lot of their projects. A lot of botched migrations. Ask for a previous client list and find someone that was not too happy. - Original Message - From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 7:35 AM Subject: RE: outsource!? Performance - you'd be surprised how quickly Outlook can run over the Internet nowadays. But it can go either way, depending on the provider. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Jon Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 10:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outsource!? My CIO has asked me to attend a meeting in which IBM is going to propose outsourcing our e-mail services, taking over for our 350 Exchange 2000 mailboxes. I'm looking for arguments to marshal against outsourcing. So far, what I've got is: * security: We use Clearswift MIMEsweeper to block incoming (and outgoing) messages containing viruses or executable files (.bat, .exe, etc.). This being IBM, I'm sure they can protect against viruses, though. * disaster recovery: Our disaster site is updated in real time. During the blackout in August e-mail was up twenty minutes after I arrived at the DR site. Again, probably not a potent line item against IBM. * regulatory: we have some regulatory requirements for keeping all records (including e-mail) on site for seven years. * integration: Our CRM solution integrates directly into Exchange, adding contacts directly to the users' mailboxes. * performance: I have trouble seeing how performance would be adequate when the mail server is off site. * price: 250 users. 350 mailboxes. 140GB/month (according to the Journal folders). That can't be cheap. * legacy: Seven years of preexisting e-mail, spread out among mailboxes and pst files. About 200GB all told. What else am I missing? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Password Mainenance
Isn't that the reason you drink Pepsi? Otherwise there's water, right? . . . I think that's what they call it! - Original Message - From: Hatley, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:53 PM Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Caffeine Free??? Definitely not a typical admin! -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Well.. That's another service call logged to IT. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 12:14 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance spits Caffeine free Pepsi on monitor Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 10:47 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance While you're at it, you might as well collect everyone's ATM PIN for safekeeping. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Parker Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Your points are valid Ben. I started here 6 years ago and it was my 1st admin job. Having a list of all passwords semmed like the right thing to do at the time. And yes, management is aware of the list. I think I am going to take your advice on the GP password management. Just gotta hand it off. I know where in GP the password policy is, but right now, in the user acounts, Password never expires is checked. In order fro GP to do it's job, I will need to uncheck that. Correct? John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 9:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Password Mainenance Why is it necessary that you keep a list of all the passwords? It is one thing to have a list of service account passwords, and such, but all users is quite another thing. It is a HUGE security risk. Imagine what would happen if someone got ahold of the document that had everyones passwords. If you are using Exchange (valid assumption I think since this is an Exchange list), then you are using either NT or Windows 2000. Why can't you have your users manage their own passwords? Every client that logs in to the domain should have the ability to change their password - even 9x clients can change their passwords. This is not something that you should be doing or should have to do - now of course that is only my opinion and you are free to do as you like, but I would rather choke myself than have to maintain all my users passwords for them. Does HR know that you maintain a list of everyone's password? Does your corporate lawyer know? If not, you better make sure they do. I realize I am probably not being helpful to what you are wanting to do, but I (and probably most of the others on this list) have never run across a sysadmin who insisted on maintaining a list of all his/her users passwords. So if you like, simply dismiss this as a rant from me - it won't hurt my feelings if you do. I certainly wouldn't wish for your job if I was required to do what you are doing. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: John Parker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, October 23, 2003 8:46 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Password Mainenance Subject: RE: Password Mainenance No. We have always manually created the passwords in the past and kept a list. Doesn't make me a hacker of any sort. The company is getting so big, Just looking for a way of automating it yet maintaining a password structure. I am one person managing two departments and too many servers and sorkstations :) John Parker, MCSE IS Admin. Senior Technical Specialist Digital Display Systems. Alpha Video 7711 Computer Ave. Edina, MN. 55435 952-896-9898 Local 800-388-0008 Watts 952-896-9899 Fax 612-804-8769 Cell 952-841-3327 Direct [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be excellent to each other ---End of Line--- -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL
Re: Tumbleweed
Yes. Exchange 2K FE/BE Topology 900 users - Original Message - From: internet.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 4:53 PM Subject: Tumbleweed Has anyone used tumbleweed with Exchange 2000? Thanks Richard Tracy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 NDR msg
I have a user who received the followiing error. I can not determine why. Any help? odd thing is the mailboxes are all located on mail02. So why was the msg directe dto mail03? Thanks, John Q Jr. Microsoft Mail Internet Headers Version 2.0 Received: from mail03.domain.ad ([10.10.220.27]) by mail02.domain.ad with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:32:02 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:32:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; boundary=9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Return-Path: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2003 14:32:02.0153 (UTC) FILETIME=[771CF590:01C37871] --9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7 --9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Content-Type: message/delivery-status --9B095B5ADSN=_01C36D9A66D3EFA4003Dmail03?.ensyn Content-Type: message/rfc822 Received: from mail02.domain.ad ([10.10.220.25]) by mail03.domain.ad with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:32:01 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_=_NextPart_001_01C37871.5AF59A59 Subject: Important Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 07:31:14 -0700 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thread-Topic: Important Thread-Index: AcN4cVr1r9FT6r4mSXyHQFzdvTVJaA== From: user0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: user1 [EMAIL PROTECTED], user2 [EMAIL PROTECTED], user3 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Operations [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sales [EMAIL PROTECTED], recruiters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Sep 2003 14:32:01.0189 (UTC) FILETIME=[7689DD50:01C37871] --_=_NextPart_001_01C37871.5AF59A59 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OLK 2002 Rules Error
I know I have seen this topic discussed, but can not locate anything in the archive. Some users are getting the error; One or more rules could not be uploaded to the Exchange server and have been deactivated. This could be because some of the parameters are not supported or there is insufficient space to store all of your rules. I found this on the MS site, I asume it's due to the 32KB limit. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;278066 Is there anyway to check the limit other than getting a rough estimate by adding up the # of fules and reciepients? Is there a work around or fix. Thanks, - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA not working when default recipient policy modified
I have a E2K system where the default domain in the default recipient policy was deleted. I know you should create a recipient policy that adds the additional domains - domain2.com, etc. - that affect then add the users and make that domain the primary domain, you don't delete the actual primary domain - domain1.com - or else OWA won't work. But I'm past that. What I don't know is how to recover from this. I added to default domain to the default policy and ran the update recipient policy now. But the default domain SMTP address is not population to the users accounts. What is the issue. What is the fix for this . . . if there is one? - John Q. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5/2K co-existance
I do want mail router throgh 5.5 and no changes were made to the STMP connector - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Are the servers in the same or different routing groups? Do you want SMTP mail routed out through the 5.5 server? Have you done any configuration to the Exchange 2000 SMTP virtual server(s) and/or SMTP Connector? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance That is funny you listed that doc, those were the steps I followed. The ADC is up and running, no errors. The issue is I can get delivery receipts from the systems, when I send them mail from the ouside. But when that user replies to the message it goes to never-never land. And internal delivery, with-in the site, is fine. But when ALL users send mail to outside domains it is not listed in the queue and is never delivered. I can ping ouside and do MX lookup properly, but the message are no where to be found. That is why I think I have a real issue. From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:49:45 -0800 When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot of prep work that would eliminate most of your questions. You don't even mention 'Active Directory Connector'. There is a lot more to know before effectively answering your question as asked. I recommend starting here: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradegu ide.a sp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Could use some help, need a refresher! When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site. Are the connection for mail delivery automatically setup? I though they were. Do you have to edit the MTA or IMC connections. IMC is using DNS for delivery. There is only one MX record pointing to the 5.5 server. Do I need another directed to the E2K system. The setup is a mailfilter is passing mail from the Internet to a the 5.5 system, then I thought to the E2k box. How do I check this? The issue is I have moved one test mail box to the E2K system, and it intermintaly looses mail inbound and outbound, even when sening to users on the 5.5 system. I did check to see if the HOME server islisted correctly, it is. Thanks, - John Q _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5/2K co-existance
Ahh . . . . should have know, DNS! I had the DC of 2K listed in the DNS of the 5.5 server. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:38 PM Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Are the servers in the same or different routing groups? Do you want SMTP mail routed out through the 5.5 server? Have you done any configuration to the Exchange 2000 SMTP virtual server(s) and/or SMTP Connector? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance That is funny you listed that doc, those were the steps I followed. The ADC is up and running, no errors. The issue is I can get delivery receipts from the systems, when I send them mail from the ouside. But when that user replies to the message it goes to never-never land. And internal delivery, with-in the site, is fine. But when ALL users send mail to outside domains it is not listed in the queue and is never delivered. I can ping ouside and do MX lookup properly, but the message are no where to be found. That is why I think I have a real issue. From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:49:45 -0800 When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot of prep work that would eliminate most of your questions. You don't even mention 'Active Directory Connector'. There is a lot more to know before effectively answering your question as asked. I recommend starting here: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradegu ide.a sp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Could use some help, need a refresher! When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site. Are the connection for mail delivery automatically setup? I though they were. Do you have to edit the MTA or IMC connections. IMC is using DNS for delivery. There is only one MX record pointing to the 5.5 server. Do I need another directed to the E2K system. The setup is a mailfilter is passing mail from the Internet to a the 5.5 system, then I thought to the E2k box. How do I check this? The issue is I have moved one test mail box to the E2K system, and it intermintaly looses mail inbound and outbound, even when sening to users on the 5.5 system. I did check to see if the HOME server islisted correctly, it is. Thanks, - John Q _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5/2K co-existance
Got logging on no errors? Looks like MTA is the issue IMC is not getting messages, non e in the queue, If I knew where never-never-land was I would solve this. - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 12:34 PM Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Well now we're getting somewhere. :o) Start with message tracking. Where is 'never-never land' exactly? Also, increasing logging might produce some ugly errors in the application event log (that might make you curse at the ADC). -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions That is funny you listed that doc, those were the steps I followed. The ADC is up and running, no errors. The issue is I can get delivery receipts from the systems, when I send them mail from the ouside. But when that user replies to the message it goes to never-never land. And internal delivery, with-in the site, is fine. But when ALL users send mail to outside domains it is not listed in the queue and is never delivered. I can ping ouside and do MX lookup properly, but the message are no where to be found. That is why I think I have a real issue. From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: 5.5/2K co-existance Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:49:45 -0800 When you install Exchange2000 joining an Exchange5.5 site, there is a lot of prep work that would eliminate most of your questions. You don't even mention 'Active Directory Connector'. There is a lot more to know before effectively answering your question as asked. I recommend starting here: http://www.microsoft.com/Exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/E2Kupgradegu ide.a sp William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of The Geek Q Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Could use some help, need a refresher! When you add a E2K server into a existing 5.5 site. Are the connection for mail delivery automatically setup? I though they were. Do you have to edit the MTA or IMC connections. IMC is using DNS for delivery. There is only one MX record pointing to the 5.5 server. Do I need another directed to the E2K system. The setup is a mailfilter is passing mail from the Internet to a the 5.5 system, then I thought to the E2k box. How do I check this? The issue is I have moved one test mail box to the E2K system, and it intermintaly looses mail inbound and outbound, even when sening to users on the 5.5 system. I did check to see if the HOME server islisted correctly, it is. Thanks, - John Q _ The new MSN 8: smart spam protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Moving mailboxes from one store to another
When you move a mailbox from one store to another, are server side rules supposed to transfer. Or are they lost when you do this? Thanks, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anyone tried a tablet?
I have seen the last two models from Compaq and Toshiba as well. I liked it physically, and am unsure what type of application it will be used for. I think there soon will be better technology that will work better for the possible applications that the tablets use. - Jason - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:25 PM Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet? Are their screens fragile? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone tried a tablet? Sensitivity: Private I had a chance to try one out a Comdex. I liked everything about them except for the handwriting recognition, it sucked. My handwriting is crap thought so if you have pretty decent handwriting then it might be something for you. I liked the HP/Compaq models cause they included a keyboard. Oh and if you can get in on the beta test of the Microsoft OneNote program I would fully recommend doing so. That program is unbelievable. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ali Wilkes (IT) Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Anyone tried a tablet? Sensitivity: Private We have a Toshiba tablet PC for eval. Nice toy, can see some benefits. I personally would wait a while before buying one. I would like to get a look at the HP/Compaq. The reviews on this tend to be opposing (It's fast! It's slow! It's great! It sucks!). SO, Anyone used a tablet pc? Got one? Hated it? Comments? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: explorer window grayed-out
Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates? Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer window, the folder view does not display? It remains grayed out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied the critical update last night. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: explorer window grayed-out
nope, at the console. - Original Message - From: Christopher Hummert [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:37 AM Subject: RE: explorer window grayed-out Are you using terminal services to view this server? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: explorer window grayed-out Does anyone else on this list keep current with updates? Has anyone else experienced a problem where in W2K Adv server the explorer window, the folder view does not display? It remains grayed out. This is occurring on multiple systems, I applied the critical update last night. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OL XP - requesting data from server Hey all. I am really getting tired of hearing again and again from my users that their Outlook XP pops up a progress bar that slowly crawls across and says Outlook is requesting data from Exchange server. This is happening to our internal Outlook XP users. The users and the Exchange server are on the same LAN. What is wrong with this XP? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/OutlkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2002 18:27 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have seen this. But we have only one server. -Original Message- From: Milt Atkinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I have found this to be related to attempts to find a Public Folder or Organizatuonal Form that might be homed on another server other than the users account. It could also be just heavy traffic or views. From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 11:42:01 -0500 That's the feature of XP. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:40 PM
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Out lkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use of Outlook 2002 produces 17 percent fewer Exchange remote procedure calls (RPCs) than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Outlook uses RPCs to retrieve data from or send data to Exchange. Less Data Transmitted to the Exchange 2000 Server Test results indicate that Outlook 2002 transmits and receives 20 percent fewer bytes to and from Exchange than previous versions of Outlook in the same online usage scenarios. Fewer Delays If Outlook 2002 cannot immediately complete an RPC, it notifies you of the delay. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box displays the progress of the RPC, and provides you with the option of canceling the call. For example, if Outlook 2002 cannot contact Exchange, you can cancel the call and try again later. The Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box To wait for the call to complete, minimize the dialog box and continue to work in Outlook 2002. Continuing to work in Outlook was not possible in earlier versions of Outlook. If you do not want the Requesting data from Microsoft Exchange Server dialog box to interrupt your work, select the Always minimize this message when a delay occurs check box. Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ) - Original Message - From: Rickenbacher Beat [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 10:51 AM Subject: AW: OL XP - requesting data from server There is a document from Microsoft which addresses this issue: http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/Out lkImp.doc (Page 16) Excerpt: When a send and receive task takes a noticeable amount of time, Outlook displays an improved progress dialog box. This dialog box provides more detailed information about send and receive operations than was available in previous versions of Outlook. The following sections describe additional improvements to send and receive performance within Outlook 2002. Fewer Exchange 2000 Remote Procedure Calls (RPCs) Results of load testing indicate that the use
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
of the desktop? Yes. The Exchnage server, No! - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does this require a reboot? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl ook\CancelRPC ; Value name : TimeToShowCancelDialog ; Data type : DWORD ; Value data : 5 (the amount of time in milliseconds) WRITEVALUE (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order
Re: OL XP - requesting data from server
---Correction --- -- I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. should have read, blah. [1] Sorry for aby confusion. - John Q Jr. [1] Roger Seielstad (Swynk Exchange list communication, December 19, 2002) stated that Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:04 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server I'm currently running it now - no need for you to look. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server I will have to pull my 5.5 server back up, I am sure it was a different key for 5.5!![1] I understand your point about this being a client side key, but I was under the slight remembrance that this added key was different under 5.5. I could be wrong it's been a while since I have looked at 5.5 - John Q Jr. [1] slight look of doubt. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:42 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server No its not. It hasn't changed, either. Seeing as it has nothing to do with the server version you're running, since this is set on the client, I have a hard time understanding why the key would change. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server Yes, but the key is wrong. - Original Message - From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 12:24 PM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Um, RPC binding order has benefitted every version of Exchange I've ever used. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OL XP - requesting data from server The (HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Exchange\Exchange Provider, Rpc_Binding_Order, ncacn_ip_tcp,ncalrpc, REG_SZ), change DOES improve the efficiency in the communication between the XP client and the E2K server. I probably should have mentioned that, this is for ONLY E2K, not 5.5. The most dramatic performance improvement is when communicating with large data size transactions, ie. E-mail with large attachments, large public folders, or public folders with forms. I just used the delay of the window to calm users nerves, because by the time I had things figured out, users were edgy, due to this new contacting Exchange windows for a few months. Remember user perception is 99% of the game - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Gonzalez, Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:38 AM Subject: RE: OL XP - requesting data from server Does it actually speed up the process or just delay the inevitable? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Below is very good information, I had the same issue months ago. It is very frustrating. Simply said, if you change two registry keys I think you will be happy. One is to increase the time before the Contacting the Exchange server window appears, the other effects the RPC Binding order. The binding order will solve most problems, making the window go away will make every admins life easier. GOSUB MOVELINE ; Key changes being made for Outlook ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\CancelRPC ; HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outl
Re: RBL's / STFU
What is STFU?[1] - John Q Jr. [1] I just HAD to, as to those of you that MUST reply to this, don't! http://www.thinkgeek.com/tshirts/frustrations/575e - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:13 PM Subject: RE: RBL's Mr. Hummert, I send more than 8k responses per year to various online forums. If you and Mr. Walsh choose to misinterpret some miniscule percentage of my posts as rude (some of them, like this one are intentionally rude) quite honestly, I don't give a rat's ass. Both of the responses Mr. Walsh chose to comment on were made to people who have a long standing knowledge of my abilities and opinions. Neither of them was offended by my comments, and while the comments might be a bit stark, (or harsh to borrow from Mr. Lefkovics' verbiage) they are backed by significant level of experience. You assumed that my brevity to your query equated to rudeness. Mr. Hummert, you've already pointed out in this thread where assumptions get you. Now, please either dazzle me with your technical brilliance or STFU. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:hummertc;noghri.net] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 5:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Perhaps you should read your e-mails before you send them. Just cause you wrote something down and it sounds one way in your head doesn't meant that it will sound the same way on the other end. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-97309;ls.swynk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's I guess the #include humor.h module wasn't loaded for you this morning. I'd suggest that the spelling remark was only rude to a subset of the 32% of admins who actually could spell RBL and thus understood the barb. As a journalism major, with an English minor I am quite concerned about any grammatical errors I might have made in the comment you are referring to. Would you please be so kind as to point out my grammar errors so that I might endeavor to eliminate them from my future postings? Now, as to your point that my statement that of the 32% of mail administrators who can spell RBL many are unable to comprehend the implications of it: I've made more than 8,000 replies in various public forums in the last 12 months. I've read over 50,000 threads during that same period. It's been a relatively slow year for me, but even if we take those low water numbers back 4 years it's still a fairly substantial number of administrators and posts that I've encountered. Based on that vast experience with and exposure to mail administrators around the world, I find it highly likely that 16% or more of mail administrators don't understand fully the implications of the RBL technology they are using and or advocating. It has nothing to do with being smart or dumb. It has to do with being knowledgeable about a particular issue or technology. My comments were not directed at any particular individual user on this list and were more accurately a diatribe against the technology than those who choose to implement it. I'm sorry you chose to misinterpret my comments. -Original Message- From: Walsh, Ric [mailto:Walshr;national-citymortgage.com] Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Ok your spelling remark was rude to all of us. You following remark despite it's poor grammar seems to say that the rest of us are dumber that you. I'd have to say that it was ALL rude. Ric Walsh -Original Message- From: Walsh, Ric Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's Ok what makes you such a wizard? Also add the word rude to that. Have you though of taking an anger management class? Ric Walsh -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's I'd guess 68% or more of mail admins are unable to even spell RBL. The majority of the remainder is unable to comprehend the implications of the functionality on their environment, whether they understand how it actually works or not. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:william;techsanctuary.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RBL's That's a little harsh. (I love it when you're harsh...) Do you mean they are not aware of it, or they are unable to comprehend its functionality? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL
Slow connection Solution
What is another solution to dialup users who are used to pop connections and want calendar functions in Exchange. They like how mail was quickly downloaded with pop, but now hate OWA. The waiting part. Looked into Cirtix, but the attachment problem is limiting users functionality, new remote users are a daily occurnce. So trining users is an issue. They complain E2K OWA is too slow. Just wondering. - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K question
It is a sample question! Man what a mistake it was to post this. Give this list something to dwell on, they will. - John Q - Original Message - From: Etts, Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 9:05 AM Subject: RE: E2K question Wait a second If this is a test question, let us know next time. If you pulled this off a Microsoft test, you're in violation of the non disclosure you signed. Thanks Russell -Original Message- From: Etts, Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 11:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E2K question Hi There Interesting that you should ask this question - I had the same question come up recently. The way it was explained to me was this: If you do not back up all of your stores, then none of your transaction logs will be purged. So The correct answer is... 1) Disable circular logging 2) Perform full backups for all stores as often as your tape supply will allow. HTH Russell -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K question
Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K question
Because if you had circular logging enabaled it would prevent the purging of the logs. And more importantly there would only be one log. So it was misleading, and confusing. What I should have asked was, do you need to backup the entire Storage group to purge the logs? I know that there is only a transaction log per storage group, but I did not see any reference to any items describing when logs are purged or not. Even in the Microsoft Disaster Recovery Plan Exchange 2000 paper, but I'm still reading. - John Q - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:55 PM Subject: RE: E2K question Why would you think A, 'disabling circular logging' would be the correct answer? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 14, 2002 1:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K question Answer pelase. I think it's A. Your Exchange 2000 Server has a single storage group containing three Mailbox Stores and a Public Folder Store. You perform nightly backups that alter between a normal backup of two of the Mailbox Stores on one night and a normal backup of the other Mailbox Store and Public Folder Store on the following night. You notice that transaction log files are not being purged, and that they are now consuming nearly all available disk space. What should be done? a. Disable circular logging. b. Install a new hard disk and move the transaction log files to the new disk. c. Perform nightly incremental backups of the entire Storage Group in addition to the current backups. d. Perform differential backups of the Mailbox Stores and the Public Folder Store instead of normal backups. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IS 70GB and growing....
Maybe you should familiarize him with the delete key. - Original Message - From: Andrea Coppini [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:24 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing About 60% of our users have mailboxes over 200Mb. 1 beats the rest downright... His mailbox size is 2.6Gb. -Original Message- From: Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 08 October 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing 140MB is big, but it's not uncommon to see mailboxes greater than 1GB in size. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 8 October 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Do you think 140MB mailbox is big?!?! The exchange server is 3 years old - Original Message - From: Hansen, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 6:08 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I'd be more tempted to look at things like storage limits. 500 users and 70gig, seriously who needs to save that much email? Your email shouldn't be a file server. -Original Message- From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Would be tempted to look at things like restore time SLA, backup window time etc. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 October 2002 09:36 Posted To: Exchange List Conversation: IS 70GB and growing Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing I am reading all this thread, and still can't find which part made you so angry. How should the question be asked, so you would be so nice, to provide some information.. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 5:25 AM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help him. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark Hanji Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: IS 70GB and growing Hi. It may be some one you know. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Heaven help the consultant Hanji hires. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Great Cthulhu Jones Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote Hanji hires a consultant to fix the problem. He's not showing much improvement... (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 6:55 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing I vote for two servers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Great Cthulhu Jones Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 20:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing Who cares about it, though? If you need two servers, you need two servers. If not, buy more hard drives. (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty (Senteq) Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IS 70GB and growing If I recall correctly, using the Move Mailbox utility retains SIS. -Original Message- From: Mark Hanji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, 30 September 2002 6:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: IS 70GB and growing Hi guys. I have an exchange 5.5 on a strong machine. The IS is over 73GB (total of 500 users). I am thinking whether it is the right move to split this box into two servers. The main problem is that I will loose SIS... On the other hand, I will have two smaller databases. I am sure some of you had this scenario in the past. I would like to hear your opinions. In case it is important, the IS is going to be moved to EMC box in 3 months (part of storage project). I am mostly intersted hearing from happy users with such big IS (are there?!)
Re: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder
Do you have owner rights to that public folder? - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 8:55 PM Subject: RE: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder Publish or perish! Well, here's a guess: Q241707. That applies to Exchange 2000, though, so you might try searching TechNet for other suggestions. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Technical Consultant hp Services There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Watkins V Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 6:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Unable to publish form to organizational forms folder When I try to publish, I get the message that I am unable to publish due to a mapi error, I do not have owner rights. Have checked on administrator that I have owner rights on the folder and I do. What else could be wrong? Am using Exchange 5.5 sp4 NT4 sp6a etc. Any ideas please, many thanks Vanessa Watkins Royal Holloway, University of London _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Missing INBOXES
Maybe they are not as popular as they think! I have had this problem numerous times. user I have no mail today admin O.K., sorry! user Is something wrong w/ the mail server. admin no user then why do I not have any E-mail messages from today admin pondering a quip, white eating a fish taco, why do you THINK you should have mail? user because I always do. admin I see, well I guess today will be a first for you then user why admin . . . . . .fill in your own response here But I'm sure you get the idea. I have not been able to get MS to write a Q article about it. - John Q - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Missing INBOXES We are using Exchange 5.5./sp/4. For some reason some users mailbox came up with no mail, once they are in Outlook 2000. I have did the Database clean up utilities for Exchange. Is there something else i can look at. Again nothing was deleted, for some reason they don't have thier mail in the inbox. Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Employee gone, what to do with the maill box
I haveThere is a manager, nit mine, but of a guy he just let go, and he needs some information for this past Employees mailbox. What is the best way to allow this user to access this box. Just give him permissionas and have him add it to his profile? E2K, user is using Outlook 2K. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
W32/Bugbear-A spreading rapidly
Anyone getting hit with this. Sophos sent a high alert warning of a unprecedented distribution. I have not been alerted to one infected message yet. Just curious. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
support for developers
I know there is PSS for help from MS, but is there another number for assistance for programming of Exchange 2K. I have a developer tyring to create a OWA forwarding feature for users that he is stuggling with. Or better yet, I'm buying if someone has already created one. - Jon Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP will not send
List, Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail. When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done from the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details. But when I use a php script to do it from a web page the mail does not send. It initiates the initial commands but then does not establish the outbound connection. See log below (From PHP script) for details. Can anyone provide me with where to look for the issue? - John Q #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:28 #Fields: date time c-ip cs-username s-sitename s-computername s-ip s-port cs-method sc-win32-status sc-bytes time-taken cs-host cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) (Telnet from port) 2002-09-25 19:18:28 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:36 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 37 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 0 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 57 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:48 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 c 0 32 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:56 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 31 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 11469 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 - OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 55 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 EHLO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 38 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 HELO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 86 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 MAIL 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 39 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 RCPT 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 48 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 DATA 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 29 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 33 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 QUIT 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 22 16 - - - (From PHP script) 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 46 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 34 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 63 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 QUIT 63 75 0 - - - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP will not send
Cthulhu Jones, While I appreciate your gifted response. The code in question is not mine. I do understand enough programming and PERL to figure out what is going on. I did resolve the issue, sort of, by using a sendmail server to relay the messages, the E2K server and IIS SMTP service would not work. Looks as if it was RFC 812 compliant, but anyway. It also worked using 5.5. Now I just have to find the difference between the communication strings of the 5.5 sendmail system versus the E2K and IIS 5.0 service. Why . . .oh why it interprets a QUIT command before it send the mail? And not it is not a relay issue. Checked that. John Q Jr. P.S. I'll let you know. - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 9:00 PM Subject: RE: SMTP will not send A PHP programming forum, perhaps? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP will not send List, Can someone please point me in the right direction here? I have an IIS system (www11-sfb) that I want to send mail. When I telnet to the port it works fine and sends mail. This is done from the local machine. See logs below (Telnet from port) for details. But when I use a php script to do it from a web page the mail does not send. It initiates the initial commands but then does not establish the outbound connection. See log below (From PHP script) for details. Can anyone provide me with where to look for the issue? - John Q #Software: Microsoft Internet Information Services 5.0 #Version: 1.0 #Date: 2002-09-25 19:18:28 #Fields: date time c-ip cs-username s-sitename s-computername s-ip s-port cs-method sc-win32-status sc-bytes time-taken cs-host cs(Cookie) cs(Referer) (Telnet from port) 2002-09-25 19:18:28 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:36 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 37 15 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 0 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:44 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 57 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:48 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 c 0 32 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:18:56 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 31 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 127.0.0.1 - SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 11469 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 - OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 55 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 EHLO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 38 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 HELO 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 86 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 MAIL 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 39 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 RCPT 0 4 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 48 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 DATA 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 29 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 33 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionCommand SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 QUIT 0 4 16 - - - 2002-09-25 19:19:09 mailfilter01-ens.phx1m.domain.com OutboundConnectionResponse SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB - 25 - 0 22 16 - - - (From PHP script) 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 HELO 0 50 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 MAIL 0 46 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 RCPT 0 34 0 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 DATA 0 139 63 - - - 2002-09-25 19:23:41 127.0.0.1 www11-sfb SMTPSVC1 WWW11-SFB 127.0.0.1 0 QUIT 63 75 0 - - - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
Re: Test
TEST - Did you just forget about the FAQs today? - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 7:15 AM Subject: Test Test - is the list just quiet today Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exmerge fails on import
If I am not mistaken you need to revert back to the old MAPI32.dll
- Original Message -
From: Allison M. Wittstock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Oh great I alrady installed it before I read this.
Also, I tried to Exmerge again and it failed.
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
Its true for E2k as well. Theres a Technet article floating around
somewhere
about it. It can be done but YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
I seem to remember for exch55 that installing any version of OL on the
exch
server = BAD...unless if you really had too... you installed OL first
then
installed exch..
It was something about OL over writting the mapi32.dll? of the exch
server
with the OL version or something like that.
2 cents
bill
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 4:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Outlook Express...
OK Now I am thinking I might need Outlook 2000? Wasn't there a thread
in
this
list a week or so ago which discussed not installing Outlook onto the
Exchange
server itself? Or am I dreaming things?
So if I install OL 2000 you reckon it will work?
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
What version of Outlook is installed on the box doing the import?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 2:23 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
No, I just checked and the PSTs are not read-only.
AW
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
Does the cause related in Q323671 apply anyway?
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exmerge fails on import
Hi,
No -- Just one 2000 server to another. Both are Windows 2000
servers, however the server I exported from is at SP2, and
the new server which the imports are failing is at SP3.
AW
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, you wrote:
wouldn't happen to be moving from E55 to E2K would you?
Q323671
-Original Message-
From: Allison M. Wittstock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 12:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exmerge fails on import
Hello,
I am using Exmerge for the first time with Exchange 2000.
I exported some mailboxes to PSTs and copied the files to my
new
server. On the new server, I run exmerge and try to import
them (into
new mailboxes that
have not yet been logged in to). However, I get some
errors. Below is
from the
log file that was generated.
[19:10:45] Mailbox has never been logged into. Using default
locale
[19:10:45] Using locale 0x407 and code page 1252 to connect
to mailbox
[19:10:45] Merging data from file 'C:\EXMERGEDATA\DS.PST'
to mailbox
'Dieter Schmieter' ('DS') on server 'EXCHANGE'.
[19:10:45] DN of
object is'/o=CompanyName/ou=Erste administrative
Gruppe/cn=Recipients/cn=ds'. [19:10:45]Entered Routine:
(CMapiSession::MapiInit) [19:10:45] Successfully
initialized MAPI.
[19:10:45] Ending Routine: (CMapiSession::MapiInit)
[19:10:45] Entered Routine:
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[19:10:45] Error configuring message service (MSPST MS)
(UNKNOWN ERROR)
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[19:10:45] Ending Routine:
(CMapiSession::CreateEMSPSTProfile)
[19:10:45] Errors encountered. Copy process aborted for
mailbox 'Dieter
Schmieter' ('DS').
[19:10:45] Entered Routine: (CMapiSession::DeleteOurProfile)
[19:10:45] Ending Routine: (CMapiSession::DeleteOurProfile)
[19:10:45] Ending Routine: EDKRoutines::CopyMailBoxData)
[19:10:45] ((Thread0)) CopyMailboxData Failed -DS
[19:10:45] ((Thread0)) Incremented progress bar
[19:10:45] Number of items copied from the source store for
all
mailboxes processed: 0
[19:10:45] Total number of folders processed in the
source store: 0
What I thought I had to do was just enable send as and
receive as
for the Administrator for the mailbox stores. In the Allow,
both are
ticked, and in
the Refuse, its ticked and greyed out.
What else do I
Re: TEST - Answer
Exchange 2000, answering questions, and fish tacos - Original Message - From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:18 AM Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Sorry that is a question..and I though we where doing answers with the other parties stating the question... So far Jeff Waters has a 100point for the right question to the answer... will he risk it and go for the bonus? -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Well, then: I am new to exchange, how do I setup my hardware? -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer Ahhas to be in the form of a question -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer os, logs, store -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST - Answer RAID 1, RAID 1, RAID 5 for 100 points -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST He did.didn't you see the question mark. On a side not let's change things up today and post answers. Then everyone has to respond in the form of a question.we'll make Tuesday jeopardy Day for the list -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David N. Precht Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: TEST Why not post a question? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Exchange.ListServe Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 07:28 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: TEST list dead or unsubscribed? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name
Agreed, and SSL takes a big chunk of resources. Plan accordingly. - Original Message - From: Tom Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:44 AM Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Yeah, they'll love the interface and switch to complaining about the performance. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:38 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Thats a big 10-4 Rubber Ducky. -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Our users have complained about OWA (5.5)... Is OWA any better (more user friendly) in Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name 2 or use OWA -Original Message- From: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 1:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Internal Exchange Name vs. external Internet Address/Name Hi All, Is there a way to have Outlook NOT rename the Exchange Server after it resolved the server address? Our situation: Internally, the server is named MAIL It can be reached via the web at TEST.company.com When we configure Outlook, we enter TEST.company.com and it validates the user... Then it changes the server name to MAIL. Of course, Outlook will no longer work because the address MAIL is not valid on the net. We have 2 solutions, but we do not like either: 1) Add HOSTS table entry on remote machines (but then they fail internally) 2) Require VPN connection Of course, had I foreseen this issue, I would have named the Exchange server TEST.company.com to begin with (assuming that is even possible). Thanks for any ideas/insight, David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == == == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
55. IS = 16GB
How would one go about recovering from a IS that was bigger than 16GB, crashing the Exchnage 5.5 server? Does anything need to be done after compressing the IS with eseutil.exe? consisitancy cheking? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Folders Messages Access
Hello ALL, I am unable to have ANY of my users access mail through OWA. They all get a Loading . . . message after authenicating. The OWA page appears but instead of messages being listed it says' loading. When any user clicks on the Folders icon they get, The item could not be found. It may have been deleted. error window. (Images are present by viewing through IIS) Users can access calendars, options, tasks, etc . . ., through OWA. This is a new setup and has never worked. Set up is 4 E2K servers on Win 2K Adv server, two front two backend server. All SP2. I get this eror on the front-end server and back-end. Found article q280823, which describes my issue exactally, but none of the resolutions worked. Users can access mail through Outlook 2000, just fine. Thanks for any ideas, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Folders Messages Access
I did not change any file permission or IIS settings/permissions. I can reach OWA fine, I just am unable to view any messages from ANY server. I just get the annoying loading . . . What happens if two Exchange server share the same .edb .stm file on a network storage device? Is that possible? P.S. I did check the language settings. - Original Message - From: Great Cthulhu Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:12 PM Subject: RE: OWA Folders Messages Access What is the IIS setup on that box? Did you mess with any permissions? Can you reach OWA when logged on to a back-end server and hitting the http:\\127.0.0.1\exchange address? (:= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 4:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Folders Messages Access Hello ALL, I am unable to have ANY of my users access mail through OWA. They all get a Loading . . . message after authenicating. The OWA page appears but instead of messages being listed it says' loading. When any user clicks on the Folders icon they get, The item could not be found. It may have been deleted. error window. (Images are present by viewing through IIS) Users can access calendars, options, tasks, etc . . ., through OWA. This is a new setup and has never worked. Set up is 4 E2K servers on Win 2K Adv server, two front two backend server. All SP2. I get this eror on the front-end server and back-end. Found article q280823, which describes my issue exactally, but none of the resolutions worked. Users can access mail through Outlook 2000, just fine. Thanks for any ideas, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mass email software
You might want to also look into blackhole lists or proc mail. -Original Message- From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Mass email software The marketing dept of my company has just told me they were asked to buy some mass email software called infacta (www.infacta.com) by a director. Apart from the obvious issues like bandwidth (they're on a 128 dialup isdn!) what other issues should I be looking out for? thanks Rob intY has scanned this email for all known viruses (www.inty.com) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Help stopping local delivery
Do you have your AD DNS as the root same as your E-mail domain? - Original Message - From: Wendy Reetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 8:11 AM Subject: Re: Help stopping local delivery Can't tell 5000 users not to send mail while connected to exchange, defeats the purpose of exchange as a mail server. Yes, I think it's obvious I am using it as a mail server, mail just has to go through a particular path of unix machines to get there. that path is preempted by a couple things: 1) reply to address (fixed) 2) local delivery (still not sure if I can stop). - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:55 AM Subject: RE: Help stopping local delivery if it was that easy, I would. :-) OK. Tell the users not to send mail while connected to the Exchange server. I need to have a reply to address on everyone that is authoratative on another machine. Can do the reply to the suggested way of using a second smtp address set as primary, but, then I get local delivery issues. If you're not using Exchange as a mail server, don't use it as a mail server. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Issues
Any one ever run through the steps in Q282230? After I did, it resolved my HTTP/1.1 503 error but now the page is diplayed w/ out the great graphics, it's just a direct directory list. It works as it should, authenication, you see the mailboxes, then your folders and your E-mail are listed as a file that can be opened and read. Any ideas, do I need to reinstall OWA? It's as if my images and asp pages are gone. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:27 AM Subject: RE: OWA Issues What does your Exchange administrator say? -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 11:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues Why, yes I am. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 12:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Issues Are you having some issues? -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Issues Running OWA 2000 version, Has anyone ran into problems with Macintosh and/or PC clients connecting to the web url for your OWA? Any problems with different OS levels, Mac 9 or 10 or any version of windows. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: W2k Sp3 is out
What version of Scanmail did you upgrade to? - Original Message - From: Mike Lagase [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 7:11 PM Subject: RE: W2k Sp3 is out Just be careful if you are running Scanmail for Exchange 2000 on the machine. I had a problem where the IIS admin service was terminating continually in a loop after apply sp3. The only way to stop it was to stop the ScanMail services. Once I upgraded Scanmail to the version they have off the web, all is well now. Or at least for now. Just a quick heads up. Mike -Original Message- From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 10:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: W2k Sp3 is out Nothing mentioned on the Microsoft pages, but http://download.microsoft.com/download/win2000platform/SP/SP3/NT5/EN-US/ w2ksp3.exe _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: *That* list...
Have the issue too, just as described. Thought it was becuase of a hotmail thing. No? - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: *That* list... Having been on my most excellent behavior, I'm getting a bit peeved at the freakin' list for putting my address on hold once a day for the last several days. I know what the message says, but why does it do that in a random manner (hadn't happened for a couple of months before this), and has anybody been able to workaround? Regular Exch2K, SP2, no known issues. I know others have this problem, but what's a body to do? Is that why Ed C. is off-line again? David A. Florea, Sys Admin Private Consulting Group Inc. 503-972-1500 x310 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Associate yourself with men of good quality, if you esteem your own reputation; for it is better to be alone than in bad company. ~George Washington (1732-1799, First President of the USA) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA setup problems
but I want one! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 9:26 AM Subject: RE: OWA setup problems E2K OWA doesn't have a logon page. -Original Message- From: Jerry Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 10:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA setup problems Ok, what I have now done is to just set up IIS and exchange with defaults and some test users with mailboxes. I fought with it then got more frustrated and walked away and came back an hour later and voila, it works. Now I just need to figure out how to get it to let me bring up the webpage and just log in via the web page instead of the login box. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange with ISA
Anyone have a favorite site for information on setting up an ISA server with Exchange, and the problems one might encounter? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
E2K Memory Errors
If I did not see this with my own two eyes, I would not believe it! Any one else ever see this error? Source: MSExchnageIS Event ID: 9582 The virtual memory necessary to run your Exchange server is fragmented in such a way that normal operation may begin to fail. It is highly recommended that you restart all Exchange services to correct this issue. For more information, click http://www.microsoft.com/contentrendirect.asp System is E2K SP2 on Win 2 K server 1024 MB RAM swap file = 1.5GB _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clients expirence a slow mail server
I have a single E2K system with only 55 users. Heavy users, but only 55. The issue I am experiencing is that users complain about slow mail from Outlook. It takes for ever to perform any operation. But, if I reboot the mail server the issue goes away until the next day. Any ideas? Where should I be looking to improve system performance. All specs and details are below. When I run a topology calculator from the MS site it gives me the feedback that 1 server should be sufficient. Enterprise version Win 2K server Dual Intel 733 Procs 2.5 GB RAM 4 x 18.2GB (RAID 5) IS store = 89.GB (Public Store = 35MB) Anti Virus SW = Trend Scanmail6 for E2K (scanning body and attachments) Send aprox. 10K messages a day external, 10K internal All users use OLK XP, 5 OWA users. No POP or IMAP clients. (desktop = XP) Backups nightly of mail store and file system, NOT THE M drive! (Netbackup) network connection the mail system = 10ms. (1 100BaseT connection from mail system, all clients on same switch) High latency is shown for RPC packets from Perf mon, but unsure of the cause. Thanks for ANY ideas, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clients expirence a slow mail server
Typo = 9.8 GB - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: Clients expirence a slow mail server You are out of disk space? You have over a 100GB with only 54GB of disk space. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Clients expirence a slow mail server I have a single E2K system with only 55 users. Heavy users, but only 55. The issue I am experiencing is that users complain about slow mail from Outlook. It takes for ever to perform any operation. But, if I reboot the mail server the issue goes away until the next day. Any ideas? Where should I be looking to improve system performance. All specs and details are below. When I run a topology calculator from the MS site it gives me the feedback that 1 server should be sufficient. Enterprise version Win 2K server Dual Intel 733 Procs 2.5 GB RAM 4 x 18.2GB (RAID 5) IS store = 89.GB (Public Store = 35MB) Anti Virus SW = Trend Scanmail6 for E2K (scanning body and attachments) Send aprox. 10K messages a day external, 10K internal All users use OLK XP, 5 OWA users. No POP or IMAP clients. (desktop = XP) Backups nightly of mail store and file system, NOT THE M drive! (Netbackup) network connection the mail system = 10ms. (1 100BaseT connection from mail system, all clients on same switch) High latency is shown for RPC packets from Perf mon, but unsure of the cause. Thanks for ANY ideas, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Really need help with 5.5 to 2000 upgrade
James - I would pay close attention to what Kim has said here. I am not sure how large your environment is, but you could run into some very big issues here. Testing is another key point, and roll-back another, this sounds like a deployment primed for failure. What you have listed can be done, but not easily. - John Q - Original Message - From: Kim Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:15 PM Subject: RE: Really need help with 5.5 to 2000 upgrade this is where that lovely Patsy Cline quote comes in so handy: People in hell want ice water. your client may want a lot of things, but they can't really have them all at once, can they? If they don't want to upgrade their domain to 2000 yet, and only want to buy one new server, and can't give up any existing functionality even though it cannot co-exist, then they can't really afford to run Exchange 2000. you could offer them some ice water, to soften the blow. In most places, it's still free. -Original Message- From: James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:40 AM Posted To: MS Exchange Forum Conversation: Really need help with 5.5 to 2000 upgrade Subject: Really need help with 5.5 to 2000 upgrade My client has an NT 4.0 domain, running Exchange 5.5, and they want to upgrade to 2000. The problem I'm having is that they're using SBS Server 4.5 (so trusts can't be used), and they don't want to upgrade their domain to 2000 yet. To top things off, some of their proprietary software for telephony and faxing will not work under 2000. They have a PDC, one BDC, and only want to spend enough money to add one extra machine to the network, so this will have to be runnind AD and Exchange 2000! My plan so far is to install a new 2000 domain, use the Exchange ADC to pull account information over and install the Exchange 2000 server as a new server in their existing organization. Following this, move the mailboxes from Exchange 5.5 to 2000, and finally configure the organization to use the 5.5 server for sending/recieving any mail destined for external (smtp) addresses. Is this solution possible, or does anybody have any better suggestions? If they weren't using SBS, and/or we could upgrade the whole domain to Win2k/Exch2k this wouldn't be such a problem, but these are options I don't have. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: User lockout
I was wondering if anyone has ever had this issue? The vast knowledge here amazes me everyday[1] A stand-alone system, user properties has user cannot change password, but the system checked user must change password at next login when the password expiration time expired. Thus causing both checkboxes to be inaccessible by the administrator. i.e. grayed out. - John Q [1] Hoping a$$-kissing will butter someone up to answer the question. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: User lockout
Windows 2000 Server SP2 No AD, standalone server, in workgroup. User rights don't matter, user can be admin, power user, etc . . . system locks account out. - Original Message - From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 11:11 AM Subject: RE: User lockout Need more data -- NT/AD, versions, rights, etc. would be helpful Geoff... -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: User lockout I was wondering if anyone has ever had this issue? The vast knowledge here amazes me everyday[1] A stand-alone system, user properties has user cannot change password, but the system checked user must change password at next login when the password expiration time expired. Thus causing both checkboxes to be inaccessible by the administrator. i.e. grayed out. - John Q [1] Hoping a$$-kissing will butter someone up to answer the question. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY
I have also experienced this. E2K SP2 on Windows Server. The store continues to suck up memory. Not to the point of total max. memory, but I have found that after the store.exe process consumes over 300MB, it's all over. Running Trend Scanmail 5.0, and there was an issue with E2K SP2 installed after Anti-Virus SW, but trend says that has been fixed. I recommend building E2K on Adv. Server is you have the $. Otherwise use the E2K memory management tools and options. I say memory leak! PSS says, good luck! - Original Message - From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:35 AM Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY the friggin was for lyris, if that's what you're bitching about. and it was helpful, and Don was helpful ... if he had called MS it's the first thing they tell you to do, you know. unfortunately they aren't allowed to call it BAS, which it is anyway, because Don owns that! -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 8:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY What a helpful response... This might be more helpful. What versions of Virusscan Groupshield? If GS 4.5, is hotfix 7 applied? I'd recommend upgrading to GS 5.0 if you're stuck with McAfee (we are :-( ) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 June 2002 14:11 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY Friggin Remove them and find out. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: STORE.EXE--CONSUMING TOO MUCH MEMORY We are running Exchange 5.5 with the latest service packs and updates. Our message store consumes more and more memory until is it shut down by Exchange. This just started happening recently. When it happens, all users are prevented from connecting via Windows Outlook Client. What could cause something like this? We are running MacAfee Virus scan and GroupShield on this machine. Could that have any effect? TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar Permissions
I have users inadvertently scheduling conflicting appointments in our calendar, for a conference room. They are not scheduling this as a resource, but instead are logging appointments directly into the calendar. How do you, automatically decline conflicting appointments? If users are going to continue to schedule appointments in this manner, how should I set the permissions so that by default, people cannot modify existing appointments, nor can they create conflicting appointments. I know there is no good technological solution for poor habits. - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Calendar Permissions
Anyone try using the process in refrence Q196534 using Outlook XP yet? A2: Outlook 2000 offers a basic resource booking script - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:38 PM Subject: RE: Calendar Permissions Use the resource booking script mentioned in the FAQ instead. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Calendar Permissions I have users inadvertently scheduling conflicting appointments in our calendar, for a conference room. They are not scheduling this as a resource, but instead are logging appointments directly into the calendar. How do you, automatically decline conflicting appointments? If users are going to continue to schedule appointments in this manner, how should I set the permissions so that by default, people cannot modify existing appointments, nor can they create conflicting appointments. I know there is no good technological solution for poor habits. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025
When I installed HotFix Q287678 on my Exchange 2000 server that already had SP2 the system stopped all the Exchange services, as expected, but a few odd things happened. 1) The queue was cleared, does this occur everytime you shutdown the E2K services? 2) Duplicate messages were re-sent to users, dating back to May 22nd. I found no significance of that date (i.e. the last time the services were stopped started, or system was rebooted occurred more recently). Not all messages just a few dozen. Anyone have any idea what caused this? 3) When the queue was cleared, about 60 messages had been sitting in the queue finally sent. The oldest message I could track dated back to May 14th. I am at fault for not checking the queue more often, but it appears that these 60 messages were stuck in the queue for what ever reason. What I don't understand is why most of these messages, a few thousand a day were sent w/o issue, some to some of the same domains as some of the stuck messages, sent fine and others did not. Finally, why did user not get NDR's, they are set to send after 5 days of attempts have failed. Thank you, - John Q P.S. Any input appreciated. - Original Message - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025
No, I was a little behind on this one. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:03 AM Subject: RE: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 Q287678 - that's not the most recent hotfix Q number, is it? -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Product Support Services - Microsoft Security Bulletin -MS02 -025 When I installed HotFix Q287678 on my Exchange 2000 server that already had SP2 the system stopped all the Exchange services, as expected, but a few odd things happened. 1) The queue was cleared, does this occur everytime you shutdown the E2K services? 2) Duplicate messages were re-sent to users, dating back to May 22nd. I found no significance of that date (i.e. the last time the services were stopped started, or system was rebooted occurred more recently). Not all messages just a few dozen. Anyone have any idea what caused this? 3) When the queue was cleared, about 60 messages had been sitting in the queue finally sent. The oldest message I could track dated back to May 14th. I am at fault for not checking the queue more often, but it appears that these 60 messages were stuck in the queue for what ever reason. What I don't understand is why most of these messages, a few thousand a day were sent w/o issue, some to some of the same domains as some of the stuck messages, sent fine and others did not. Finally, why did user not get NDR's, they are set to send after 5 days of attempts have failed. Thank you, - John Q P.S. Any input appreciated. - Original Message - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Where is everyone?
Phoenix, 98° F . . . .getting hot. Data Center: 68° F I'll stay inside today. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:31 AM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Richland, WA...SE Corner of Washington State. 3.5 hours SE of Seattle. Temperature 73° F (supposed to get to 85) Windchill 76° F (means it's a hot wind) Humidity 41% Wind Southwest at 13 mph Conditions Fair Visibility 10.0 miles -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Messages building in queue
Has anyone else had issues with mail queuing for a week, then sending when forced. Should I be forcing mail to send from the queue on a regular basis, that seems odd. = When I installed HotFix Q287678 on my Exchange 2000 server that already had SP2 the system stopped all the Exchange services, as expected, but a few odd things happened. 1) The queue was cleared, does this occur everytime you shutdown the E2K services? 2) Duplicate messages were re-sent to users, dating back to May 22nd. I found no significance of that date (i.e. the last time the services were stopped started, or system was rebooted occurred more recently). Not all messages just a few dozen. Anyone have any idea what caused this? 3) When the queue was cleared, about 60 messages had been sitting in the queue finally sent. The oldest message I could track dated back to May 14th. I am at fault for not checking the queue more often, but it appears that these 60 messages were stuck in the queue for what ever reason. What I don't understand is why most of these messages, a few thousand a day were sent w/o issue, some to some of the same domains as some of the stuck messages, sent fine and others did not. Finally, why did user not get NDR's, they are set to send after 5 days of attempts have failed. Thank you, - John Q P.S. Any input appreciated. - Original Message - _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Synchronizing Folders
Is there any way to synchronize system folders like you do folders in outlook? Or tick Outlook into thinking windows folders are Outlook foldrers? I am attempting to resolve an Issue I have with a user that is almost always remote. He needs large Office files on his laptop when his not connected to the network. He would like to keep the files on the fs for backup. But wants the files to be copies. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus activity
Same here as well. - John Q - Original Message - From: Horst Hinz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:10 AM Subject: RE: Virus activity Tons of it here too... be happy to send you some. -Original Message- From: Filipe Joel de Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus activity Funny though, I haven't received a single copy of Klez on any of my systems... Filipe Joel de Almeida Network Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mobile: +351 967819600 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: sexta-feira, 26 de Abril de 2002 17:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus activity Oh yea. Klez is really doing a number. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 9:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus activity Is it just me or is anyone else been getting tons of .pif's, .exe's, .scr's, etc. into their mail systems? Antigen is getting them all but the frequency is much higher than normal... Bill Lambert Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000?
run all my mail through procmail. - John Q - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:19 PM Subject: RE: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000? User education. That's it. -Original Message- From: Mike Lagase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: What is everyone using for spam prevention for Exchange 2000? I have Scanmail but the content scanning service, to put it in plain english sucks. Any suggestions would be great. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Store.exe memmory usage
I have noticed that when store.exe uses a lot of memory, such as during a mailbox import, it never releases the memory with E2K SP2. Has anyone else noticed this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 5:08 PM Subject: Re: Store.exe memmory usage It uses the amount it needs. - Original Message - From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:27 PM Subject: Store.exe memmory usage Hi all, I just installed a new EX5.5 server and the store.exe will NOT use all available memmory. :-( Config: IBM box with 3 CPU, 3GB RAM, RAID1 for c:\, (os) RAID1 for d:\(swap), RAID1 for e:\ (logs) and RAID5 for f:\ (db). More than 1000 users. I have the /3GB switch in boot.ini. Store.exe uses only about 900MB and I have almost 2GB of RAM fee. I have two more similar boxes and the store.exe will grab more than 2GB of RAM. Any ideas? TIA /Peter _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:mailbox size limits
I have a user that is using a mail that gets this error when attempting to send an attachment that is 47K. mail01-ens.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;552 sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit (#5.3.4) The default limits are set to No limit for sending mail size in Message Delivery Properties. Then I looked into the user profile delivery restrictions and it was set to Use default limit, so I changed the Sending message size to Maximum KB: 200. But the user still gets the message. Where else are the limits set? Is this what the error message is referring to? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mailbox size limits
I know I am taking a chance here, but how did you determine that? Just from the events or is there something in the error that I don't understand? - John Q - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:23 PM Subject: RE: mailbox size limits It looks like the receiving domain is rejecting the message. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 3:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re:mailbox size limits I have a user that is using a mail that gets this error when attempting to send an attachment that is 47K. mail01-ens.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;552 sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit (#5.3.4) The default limits are set to No limit for sending mail size in Message Delivery Properties. Then I looked into the user profile delivery restrictions and it was set to Use default limit, so I changed the Sending message size to Maximum KB: 200. But the user still gets the message. Where else are the limits set? Is this what the error message is referring to? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Re:mailbox size limits
I understand and I think the issue here is my poor communication skills. mail01-ens.domain.com is MY mail server. The mail server where no limits are set! I appreciate the advice. I think my question should have been, What does, that message size exceeds my databytes limit mean in terms of where are the possible settings for these limits OTHER than the two places I have mentioned. (below) Are there any other places? Yes the message is CLEAR, I just don't know if I have ALL the places it could have been set. This is what I got from the message, #5.3.4 smtp - 5.X.X Permanent Failure X.3.4 Message too big for system 552 - sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit. So I looked at the limits and found no inconsistencies. Please let me know where I went wrong, besides coming to this list!, ridicules included. :-) Thank You, - John Q - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:32 PM Subject: RE: Re:mailbox size limits John, what Daniel is saying is that if you look at the error message, it CLEARLY says that the message is being rejected BY mail01-ens.domain.com as indicated by the 552 sorry, that message size exceeds My databytes limit. I think there are many times that admins don't trust themselves. This may or may not have been the case here. Understanding error messages is one of the basic functions of our jobs. It is frustrating for many of us here when the same questions get asked over and over when all it would take is 2 seconds to actually look at the message and say to yourself, Oh, this is the domain I am sending to. Oh, they are saying that the message size exceeds their limit. Plus, if you know that you have no limits set on your servers, then it really is a no-brainer. Trust yourself a little more. It will make things easier. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits Dan - I have thought about this, as I listed below, I understand that there are size limit issues. But where these are controlled was my question, or where the size limit issue is. I can, will, and do research and read, but thank you. - John Q - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits I see Soysal already answered. I'll take this opportunity to rant a little bit. The title of administrator carries with it an implicit ability to logically think things through. The error message you are getting below is _completely_ clear - mail01-ens.domain.com obviously has a message size limit. THINK, dammit. Stop expecting the world to earn your paycheck for you. - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:21 PM Subject: Re:mailbox size limits I have a user that is using a mail that gets this error when attempting to send an attachment that is 47K. mail01-ens.domain.com #5.5.0 smtp;552 sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit (#5.3.4) The default limits are set to No limit for sending mail size in Message Delivery Properties. Then I looked into the user profile delivery restrictions and it was set to Use default limit, so I changed the Sending message size to Maximum KB: 200. But the user still gets the message. Where else are the limits set? Is this what the error message is referring to? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
Re: Re:mailbox size limits
Great! [1]Excuse me for obfuscating the domain, I thought it was best. I now understand my faulty thinking. That was the information I was really looking for. I did not realize the error message using sorry was from another system. So now I understand that message came from the OTHER server. I do not see how I could have read into that. I do understand why I got the responses I did, see above. [1] If anyone could direct me to a place where error messages are described detailed I would love to know. Thank you all again, John Q - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:07 PM Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits First off, you obfuscated the domain name of the server. As has been said here many, many times that makes it very difficult for the rest of us to help troubleshoot. Second: neither the IMS in 5.x or the SMTP service in Win2K use wording like sorry... That's coming from the system you're sending to. Your server does not send NDRs back to itself; the OTHER system is the one that sends the NDRs. Now, how about we start over? - Original Message - From: Peter Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 6:03 PM Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits Receiving user over his/her quota? /Peter - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 6:32 PM Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits I understand and I think the issue here is my poor communication skills. mail01-ens.domain.com is MY mail server. The mail server where no limits are set! I appreciate the advice. I think my question should have been, What does, that message size exceeds my databytes limit mean in terms of where are the possible settings for these limits OTHER than the two places I have mentioned. (below) Are there any other places? Yes the message is CLEAR, I just don't know if I have ALL the places it could have been set. This is what I got from the message, #5.3.4 smtp - 5.X.X Permanent Failure X.3.4 Message too big for system 552 - sorry, that message size exceeds my databytes limit. So I looked at the limits and found no inconsistencies. Please let me know where I went wrong, besides coming to this list!, ridicules included. :-) Thank You, - John Q - Original Message - From: Ben Winzenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 2:32 PM Subject: RE: Re:mailbox size limits John, what Daniel is saying is that if you look at the error message, it CLEARLY says that the message is being rejected BY mail01-ens.domain.com as indicated by the 552 sorry, that message size exceeds My databytes limit. I think there are many times that admins don't trust themselves. This may or may not have been the case here. Understanding error messages is one of the basic functions of our jobs. It is frustrating for many of us here when the same questions get asked over and over when all it would take is 2 seconds to actually look at the message and say to yourself, Oh, this is the domain I am sending to. Oh, they are saying that the message size exceeds their limit. Plus, if you know that you have no limits set on your servers, then it really is a no-brainer. Trust yourself a little more. It will make things easier. Ben Winzenz, MCSE Network/Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 4:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits Dan - I have thought about this, as I listed below, I understand that there are size limit issues. But where these are controlled was my question, or where the size limit issue is. I can, will, and do research and read, but thank you. - John Q - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 12:38 PM Subject: Re: Re:mailbox size limits I see Soysal already answered. I'll take this opportunity to rant a little bit. The title of administrator carries with it an implicit ability to logically think things through. The error message you are getting below is _completely_ clear - mail01-ens.domain.com obviously has a message size limit. THINK, dammit. Stop expecting the world to earn your paycheck for you. - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Re: Delay Outgoing Mail
If using OLK2K or XP you could also use the, Do not deliver before in Message options, and creating a template with this. Then have the user always use this template. - John Q - Original Message - From: Rasey, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:20 AM Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Ray, Where is this option? I don't have a 'Mail Delivery' tab in my Outlook2K. Dennis -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Can't you delay the sending via Outlook? Give him a minute, or 5. Tools-Options-Mail Delivery? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasey, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Get ready to laugh (I sure did) Looks like our CEO sent out an e-mail that either he shouldn't have, or wasn't quite ready to send (hit the Send key by accident, has happened to me also). Regardless, now I have to look into delaying out-going e-mails so that we have a chance to intercept it if we encounter this again. RANT To be quite honest, even if this is possible, I'm not really thrilled about implementing it, and I may go as far as saying it's not possible ;) I think delaying the e-mails would cause other problems that I'm not willing to deal with, plus I'm sure it would be difficult to delay just out-bound stuff (versus internal mails), and there is no way folks would take kindly to me delaying our internal stuff (and it wouldn't matter who 'wanted' it to be done). /RANT At this point, I'm curious if this is do-able, but I'm not that worried about it Another funny thing is this is the most techno-savvy CEO I've dealt with in my career. He's also smart enough to know it was %100 his fault (you should have heard him rag on himself for doing this). Usually we'll get bitched at for not being able to stop it (i.e. we'll get crap because the e-mail system works too fast). I'll shut up now.. Thanks all, Dennis -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Jinx. Pinch, Poke. You owe me a coke. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail To attain what goal? Just curious. -Original Message- From: Rasey, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delay Outgoing Mail I'm trying to find an option to allow us to delay outgoing e-mails. I'm using Exchange 5.5 (sp4), and I've been asked by one of my superiors to see about adding in a delay for e-mails going out to the Internet. We would like to delay those messages about 3-5 minutes. We also would like to NOT delay internal e-mails (if possible). Is this possible? If this is possible, any potential problems with this setup? Thanks, Dennis Rasey Systems Administrator PDS - Premier Dealer Services 9449 Balboa Ave. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123 858-810-1734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Re: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand
You mean ORDB, now. - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 5:37 PM Subject: RE: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand There are equally crappy alternative to Orbz, but some inbound email is not relayed SPAM. It's still junk mail. William -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand I was gonna say ORBZ, but.:) -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand The Outlook client has a built-in Adult/Junk mail filter. View filters.txt on the client to see what it does. (this file is for informational purposes only, not a config file). Otherwise, 3rd paty util on the server side. William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Orin Rehorst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Junk Mail Getting Out of Hand Is there a filter available that can keep current with junk mailers and send their mailings to the users junk folder? Regards, Orin Orin Rehorst Port of Houston Authority (Largest U.S. port in foreign tonnage) e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (713)670-2443 Fax: (713)670-2457 TOPAS web site: www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html http://www.homestead.com/topas/topas.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Ouf Of Office
Ohhh yes, I grew up with this guy! Not friends. Read, Takedown ISBN: 0786889136, not a 100% account of what happened, but pretty close. There is also a video version of this book, released in Europe only. * CAUTION: If you read this book you might NEVER get a goods nights rest ever again. Knowing your systems are never safe. Mostly due to lusers. - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:48 AM Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office Kevin Mitnick (http://www.freekevin.com/) was excellent at human engineering hacks. He certainly wasn't the best or the only one doing it. Those types of hacks work best when you know as much as possible about the target entity.. Finding out about organizational structure and information about employees makes these types of hacks much easier. Heck, there are people who get paid to do these kinds of hacks to test security systems. Building on the responses of others: 2 months later Mike gets a phone call... Mike, how ya doin? My name is Fred Smith, I was hired in 3 days ago and Jim Standin told me you were the guy to contact about getting me an NT and e-mail account set up. Oh.. By the way, how was the trip to SE Asia? I'm working in the accounting group, so can you make sure my logon script maps the drive for the accounting group. Chris Scharff - MCSE, Exchange MVP 512.652.4500 x244 Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office What kind of security risk from a human engineering standpoint do you mean? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: den 21 mars 2002 20:42 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Ouf Of Office It does, but that doesn't mean it couldn't induce a mail loop. Imagine a help desk ticketing system which uses a unique e-mail address for every e-mail message received and autoreplies to the sender. More importantly is a security risk from a human engineering standpoint. -Original Message- From: Andersson Mikael (SIX) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 4:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ouf Of Office Does Out Of Office responses to the internet really loop? I believed that OOF only replied once to every mailaddress!? Anyone who knows for sure? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: promoting E2K to a DC
I am on the phone with PSS right now. NOT MUCH HELP! They are recreating the steps I already took, but I understand that. Before I called PSS, I had extensively worked w/ the Network Engineer on the network layout/connections. Just to be safe we connected the E2K box both DC's and 1 client, to test with, all to a Foundry FastIron II switch. Set all NIC's to 100 FullDuplex and did the same on the switch interface. Also replaced all nics. Still the same issue. Should be fun. I really appreciate all the input. I'll let you know the fix but I'm sure it will be a site specific issue not much help in the future. - Original Message - From: Paul Bouzan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:42 AM Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC auto-neg - work of the devil!! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 16:55 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC I didn't want him to spend money unnecessarily either. I just wanted him to have all the information I had. Anyway, it'll probably be something silly like having auto-negotiation enabled on the switch. :) Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:08 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it is. I'm just trying to save the guy some money! PBB -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC Agreed, however, I never speculated about anything. I merely stated that this message box is generally caused by network congestion and that IF this was the culprit in John's case, to call PSS for the solution. That's why I prefaced it the way I did. Note that he said there are only 25 on this particular server, not on his whole network. He did not say how many users are on the network. I have no idea how much traffic is on the segment his E2K box resides on, or on his network as a whole. He hasn't provided that information. I mentioned what I did because this is known to be caused by network congestion and other connectivity based issues. As I said, IF this is caused by network congestion, the fix is a few registry settings that must be obtained from PSS (unless you are under an MS NDA, in which case you can get the info from MPO). I figured that since I was aware, I would mention it so that if John confirmed the cause was network congestion, he'd know there was a potential solution available for that particular scenario. Tom. -Original Message- From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC John has 25 users and I would hate to speculate on what is causing the network congestion! I have 400 users over thirty sites and PSS is not even an option yet until I have checked the cable etc. See my previous post. PBB ~ndi -Original Message- From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 March 2002 00:09 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace to confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the problem in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for registry changes to tune the length of time that will pass before the message box is presented or disable it altogether. Tom. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Re: promoting E2K to a DC
I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: promoting E2K to a DC
You know the location or what CD this is located on? - Original Message - From: Stidley, Joel [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC How is your network setup? Is your Exchange server behind a firewall or VPN? Do you have a GC close to the clients? Have you done a netmon trace to see at what point the problem is occurring? Joel -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give Requesting data from Exchange server errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients, still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way. Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Invalid ADSI pathname was passed
I get a Invalid ADSI pathname was passed when attempting to delete any usermailbox. Where can I get more info on what pathname is invalid. - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to delete a mailbox (manually)
I have a mailbox that has no account associated with it. When I run clean up agent I does not mark the account for deletion, how can I delete it? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email
Boy can I crash Exchange servers like the best. This one is a E2K, on Win 2K, both SP2. All lastes Hotfixes from windowsupdate.ms.com. Running Trend Scanmail for E2K.System was running fine for 1 year now, out of now where this. Did activate TS licenses on this server yesterday, but that's it. Have you heard of this issue? If so, I am really looking for what it means. What other troubleshooting steps can I take? Found article Q296151, but that is not my exact issue. The error number listed is 0x80044501. That is not my error #. Also what does it mean when it says, Click the Security tab, and then click the Exchange service account. Click View information store , click Administer information store , and then set the permissions. Reset the Administrative Group's service account. What is the Exchange service account? That might be my issue, I don't have one, just the Exchange Admin account. Do I need to create a E2K service acct.? Issue: -- Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event ID: 8213 Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine exchange. The error number is 0xc10306ce. Thank you, - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email SHOULD be Crashing E2K
- Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email Boy can I crash Exchange servers like the best. This one is a E2K, on Win 2K, both SP2. All lastes Hotfixes from windowsupdate.ms.com. Running Trend Scanmail for E2K.System was running fine for 1 year now, out of now where this. Did activate TS licenses on this server yesterday, but that's it. Have you heard of this issue? If so, I am really looking for what it means. What other troubleshooting steps can I take? Found article Q296151, but that is not my exact issue. The error number listed is 0x80044501. That is not my error #. Also what does it mean when it says, Click the Security tab, and then click the Exchange service account. Click View information store , click Administer information store , and then set the permissions. Reset the Administrative Group's service account. What is the Exchange service account? That might be my issue, I don't have one, just the Exchange Admin account. Do I need to create a E2K service acct.? Issue: -- Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event ID: 8213 Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine exchange. The error number is 0xc10306ce. Thank you, - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email SHOULD be Crashing E2K
Finally getting the hang of this. I hate MS support site. The errors never match up. Issue was SMTP service was really never started. Showed started in Services but when attempting to reinstall E2K it gave me an error, SMTP service not started. Tried to restart service, could not. Uninstalled and installed SMTP service, then restarted MS Information store. - John Q. - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:44 AM Subject: Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email SHOULD be Crashing E2K - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:33 AM Subject: Re: Clients receiving multiple copies of the same email Boy can I crash Exchange servers like the best. This one is a E2K, on Win 2K, both SP2. All lastes Hotfixes from windowsupdate.ms.com. Running Trend Scanmail for E2K.System was running fine for 1 year now, out of now where this. Did activate TS licenses on this server yesterday, but that's it. Have you heard of this issue? If so, I am really looking for what it means. What other troubleshooting steps can I take? Found article Q296151, but that is not my exact issue. The error number listed is 0x80044501. That is not my error #. Also what does it mean when it says, Click the Security tab, and then click the Exchange service account. Click View information store , click Administer information store , and then set the permissions. Reset the Administrative Group's service account. What is the Exchange service account? That might be my issue, I don't have one, just the Exchange Admin account. Do I need to create a E2K service acct.? Issue: -- Source: MSExchangeFBPublish Event ID: 8213 Description: System Attendant Service failed to create session for virtual machine exchange. The error number is 0xc10306ce. Thank you, - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Best way to open PST offline
I have users that need to delete E-mail from archived PST's. But to ensure that they do not delete messages from Exchnage server I want them to do this offline. I know what I am going to hear, train the users. And I swear I have, I had a staff member do a entire PP presenation on it and man were they confused. So this is plan B. I though I could just have the users open .pst by doubleclicking the file then selecting Outlook asd the program to open this with. But no that would be too easy. And having the users select File -- Work Offline, but from my understanding that will still allow users to delete current messages. Thank you much, * As always - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: change in ADSI created two accounts?
Nope, Microsoft Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) - Original Message - From: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:06 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? You're probably using a different version of outlook (the 1 I mentioned was for OL2002). Just go to Microsoft's online support. You'll find the appropriate article to clear name caching on the Outlook version you're using. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? I did read this, sorry I did not mention it. I could not locate *.nk2 on any users system. But the issue listed in the q article is exactally my issue. - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:48 AM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Sounds like the addressing problem may now be a names caching issue on Outlook since the LegacyExchangeDN was changed. Especially since you mention that the mail does not NDR when name picked directly from the GAL. If it's not too late, prior to blowing away the mailbox, follow Q287623 on a workstation that NDR'd to this user and see if that fixes the problem. Regards, Louise -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Unfortunately it did not work. I think at this point deleting the mailbox and recreating is best. I did have to change the recipient Update service from 1 server to another when a DC crashed but is there any way to check if it is working properly? Or how can I search for the field where the two accounts are listed? Where are the users getting my old account from, is there anyway to update this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:29 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Actually, I think your problem may be caused by Recipient Update Service latency. If this is true, then your problem should go away by the time you read this. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Ahhh you must know what I am talking about. 1) No same Exchange server 2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it. - John Q Jr. There is a movie about me? - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? 1. Is the user with the issue on a different Exchange Mailbox server then the one you referenced? 2. Was the user, with the issue, on an Exchange Server that was upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? In attempting to fix a Free/Busy issue I noticed that one user, the user that was having Free/Busy issues had a different legacyExchangeDN value. The top one was the old one and the bottom on was the one I replaced it with. /o=DOMAIN Exchange Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr /o=DOMAINWORLD/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr Where did I get the new entry? I copied it from another users account, adjusting the username of course. Now when users try to send mail to this user they get a , Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.Subject: RE: Calenda Sent: 3/11/2002 9:25 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Q Jr. on 3/11/2002 9:25 AM A configuration error in the recipient's e-mail system prevented delivery of this message. Two recipients are configured with the same e-mail address. Contact your administrator. domain.ensynch.com #5.1.4 How can I delete one account? Where can I edit it? I did a find in AD but only found one account. This is a E2K SP2 server with AD on a different server. Single domain environment. One thing
Re: change in ADSI created two accounts?
Damn, your right, it;s for Win 2K and ME not XP. For the OS of course. Thank you, - John Q! - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:53 PM Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Nope, Microsoft Outlook 2002 (10.2627.2625) - Original Message - From: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 4:06 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? You're probably using a different version of outlook (the 1 I mentioned was for OL2002). Just go to Microsoft's online support. You'll find the appropriate article to clear name caching on the Outlook version you're using. -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? I did read this, sorry I did not mention it. I could not locate *.nk2 on any users system. But the issue listed in the q article is exactally my issue. - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:48 AM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Sounds like the addressing problem may now be a names caching issue on Outlook since the LegacyExchangeDN was changed. Especially since you mention that the mail does not NDR when name picked directly from the GAL. If it's not too late, prior to blowing away the mailbox, follow Q287623 on a workstation that NDR'd to this user and see if that fixes the problem. Regards, Louise -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Unfortunately it did not work. I think at this point deleting the mailbox and recreating is best. I did have to change the recipient Update service from 1 server to another when a DC crashed but is there any way to check if it is working properly? Or how can I search for the field where the two accounts are listed? Where are the users getting my old account from, is there anyway to update this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:29 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Actually, I think your problem may be caused by Recipient Update Service latency. If this is true, then your problem should go away by the time you read this. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Ahhh you must know what I am talking about. 1) No same Exchange server 2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it. - John Q Jr. There is a movie about me? - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? 1. Is the user with the issue on a different Exchange Mailbox server then the one you referenced? 2. Was the user, with the issue, on an Exchange Server that was upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? In attempting to fix a Free/Busy issue I noticed that one user, the user that was having Free/Busy issues had a different legacyExchangeDN value. The top one was the old one and the bottom on was the one I replaced it with. /o=DOMAIN Exchange Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr /o=DOMAINWORLD/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr Where did I get the new entry? I copied it from another users account, adjusting the username of course. Now when users try to send mail to this user they get a , Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.Subject: RE: Calenda Sent: 3/11/2002 9:25 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Q Jr. on 3/11/2002 9:25 AM
Re: change in ADSI created two accounts?
Unfortunately it did not work. I think at this point deleting the mailbox and recreating is best. I did have to change the recipient Update service from 1 server to another when a DC crashed but is there any way to check if it is working properly? Or how can I search for the field where the two accounts are listed? Where are the users getting my old account from, is there anyway to update this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:29 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Actually, I think your problem may be caused by Recipient Update Service latency. If this is true, then your problem should go away by the time you read this. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Ahhh you must know what I am talking about. 1) No same Exchange server 2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it. - John Q Jr. There is a movie about me? - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? 1. Is the user with the issue on a different Exchange Mailbox server then the one you referenced? 2. Was the user, with the issue, on an Exchange Server that was upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? In attempting to fix a Free/Busy issue I noticed that one user, the user that was having Free/Busy issues had a different legacyExchangeDN value. The top one was the old one and the bottom on was the one I replaced it with. /o=DOMAIN Exchange Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr /o=DOMAINWORLD/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr Where did I get the new entry? I copied it from another users account, adjusting the username of course. Now when users try to send mail to this user they get a , Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.Subject: RE: Calenda Sent: 3/11/2002 9:25 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Q Jr. on 3/11/2002 9:25 AM A configuration error in the recipient's e-mail system prevented delivery of this message. Two recipients are configured with the same e-mail address. Contact your administrator. domain.ensynch.com #5.1.4 How can I delete one account? Where can I edit it? I did a find in AD but only found one account. This is a E2K SP2 server with AD on a different server. Single domain environment. One thing is it appears that when users select this user from the GAL it works. Any ideas? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus
Came out today. Dear Premium Support Customer, This message is to notify you that a new pattern is now available for download. We have uploaded: Pattern 239 to - http://activeupdate-t.trendmicro.com/activeupdate/Pattern/VSAPI.zip Details about what is new in Pattern 239 is available at: - http://activeupdate-t.trendmicro.com/activeupdate/Pattern/whatsnew.txt *Please contact your Technical Account Manager for any questions regarding the latest pattern release. Thank you, PSP 2.0 System == This e-mail is automatically generated by the PSP 2.0 system. Please do not reply. - Original Message - From: Bowles, John L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 7:26 AM Subject: RE: Virus Yea, I read that one. It seems similar to what I'm getting. That's why I was wondering if it's a variant. I've noticed when I updated my pattern files that the new pattern file is 239 now. That's not even listed on the site. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Stevens, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus http://www.antivirus.com/vinfo/virusencyclo/default5.asp?VName=WORM_FINTAS.C -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Virus What is your AV calling it? -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 6:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Is anyone getting hit with this? Or is this another variant of WORM_FINTAS.C? Hi,This is a special new game This game is my first work. You're the first player. I expect you would like it. VIRUS_DETECTED_AND_REMOVED_demo_VIRINFO.TXT real_estate[3].jpg ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: change in ADSI created two accounts?
After doing some more investigating, i.e. I watched a user try to send mail to this user. They were entering a partial name and then hitting Enter Which then resolved the name, from where I am not sure but, I'm guessing Outlook. Because when I right click on the name before the message is sent, and select properties I get the location, /O=DOMAINWORLD/OU=FIRST ADMINISTRATIVE GROUP/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=JQjr Which is correct. So I don;t know where the incorrect lookup is. But when I had the user rebuild his profile in outlook, i.e. delete it and recreate it, the problem was fixed. If you find out where Outlook stores this info I would be curious. - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:56 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Futher note: I just check the propoerties of my LegacyExchangeDN on my system, it is default to: Index this attribute in the Active Directory Ambiguous Name Resolution (ANR) Replicate this attribute to the Global Catalog This confirms that the LegacyExchangeDN value is used in resolving Ambiguous Name Resolution. Moreover, the fact that it is a GC value also means that it is surely in the DSAccess Cache. The only problem here is...I am not sure how you would flush that cachewhich would test the theory here. It may be that it is also cache in Outlook, as Louise has suggested as a possible cause, but I am not sure if that also caches the LegacyExchangeDN value? Cheers, Leonard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Leonard Lee Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 3:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Yes, it could be cache in DSAccess. I thought of that as a possiblity also. But that should be flushed out by now. Moreover, the puzzling thing is that users can still send the guy an email using the GAL..which uses DSAccess cache information? Never-the-less, there is no two accounts created for the mailbox. In Windows 2000/Exchange 2000 you can only have one mailbox per receipent object. That's because an Exchange 2000 mailbox is a unique attribute of a recipient object, which makes it a Mailbox-enabled recipient object. So, the problem is not two accounts, but some sort of cache information about the user account in the name resolution services Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Exchange Discussions Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 1:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Sounds like the addressing problem may now be a names caching issue on Outlook since the LegacyExchangeDN was changed. Especially since you mention that the mail does not NDR when name picked directly from the GAL. If it's not too late, prior to blowing away the mailbox, follow Q287623 on a workstation that NDR'd to this user and see if that fixes the problem. Regards, Louise -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Unfortunately it did not work. I think at this point deleting the mailbox and recreating is best. I did have to change the recipient Update service from 1 server to another when a DC crashed but is there any way to check if it is working properly? Or how can I search for the field where the two accounts are listed? Where are the users getting my old account from, is there anyway to update this? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:29 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? Actually, I think your problem may be caused by Recipient Update Service latency. If this is true, then your problem should go away by the time you read this. Cheers, Leonard Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 4:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? Ahhh you must know what I am talking about. 1) No same Exchange server 2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it. - John Q Jr. There is a movie about me? - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? 1. Is the user with the issue on a different Exchange Mailbox server then the one you referenced? 2. Was the user, with the issue, on an Exchange Server
Re: change in ADSI created two accounts?
In attempting to fix a Free/Busy issue I noticed that one user, the user that was having Free/Busy issues had a different legacyExchangeDN value. The top one was the old one and the bottom on was the one I replaced it with. /o=DOMAIN Exchange Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr /o=DOMAINWORLD/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr Where did I get the new entry? I copied it from another users account, adjusting the username of course. Now when users try to send mail to this user they get a , Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.Subject: RE: Calenda Sent: 3/11/2002 9:25 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Q Jr. on 3/11/2002 9:25 AM A configuration error in the recipient's e-mail system prevented delivery of this message. Two recipients are configured with the same e-mail address. Contact your administrator. domain.ensynch.com #5.1.4 How can I delete one account? Where can I edit it? I did a find in AD but only found one account. This is a E2K SP2 server with AD on a different server. Single domain environment. One thing is it appears that when users select this user from the GAL it works. Any ideas? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: change in ADSI created two accounts?
Ahhh you must know what I am talking about. 1) No same Exchange server 2) YES, and used MS migration tool. I have issues with this account previously where I had to edit the home server in ADSI when I moved it. - John Q Jr. There is a movie about me? - Original Message - From: Leonard Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:11 PM Subject: RE: change in ADSI created two accounts? 1. Is the user with the issue on a different Exchange Mailbox server then the one you referenced? 2. Was the user, with the issue, on an Exchange Server that was upgraded from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: change in ADSI created two accounts? In attempting to fix a Free/Busy issue I noticed that one user, the user that was having Free/Busy issues had a different legacyExchangeDN value. The top one was the old one and the bottom on was the one I replaced it with. /o=DOMAIN Exchange Organization/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr /o=DOMAINWORLD/ou=First Administrative Group/cn=Recipients/cn=jqjr Where did I get the new entry? I copied it from another users account, adjusting the username of course. Now when users try to send mail to this user they get a , Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.Subject: RE: Calenda Sent: 3/11/2002 9:25 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: John Q Jr. on 3/11/2002 9:25 AM A configuration error in the recipient's e-mail system prevented delivery of this message. Two recipients are configured with the same e-mail address. Contact your administrator. domain.ensynch.com #5.1.4 How can I delete one account? Where can I edit it? I did a find in AD but only found one account. This is a E2K SP2 server with AD on a different server. Single domain environment. One thing is it appears that when users select this user from the GAL it works. Any ideas? Thank You, - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Calendar
I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar. I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec. UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar. So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the permission on their calendar, and UserA UserC are both listed with Reviewer permissions. Is this setting also stored on the server side? Man I am beat down today, please help? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Calendar
Ohh man, What meant to say was UserA can not see UserB's Free / Busy time. - John Q. - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:18 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar. I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec. UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar. So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the permission on their calendar, and UserA UserC are both listed with Reviewer permissions. Is this setting also stored on the server side? Man I am beat down today, please help? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Calendar
Nope same server, only 1 server in the site. - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:01 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar They're on different servers, aren't they? - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Ohh man, What meant to say was UserA can not see UserB's Free / Busy time. - John Q. - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 2:18 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar. I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec. UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar. So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the permission on their calendar, and UserA UserC are both listed with Reviewer permissions. Is this setting also stored on the server side? Man I am beat down today, please help? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Calendar
Same internal LAN. Same server. Legacy system, this is an old admin account. It's possible he hid it from the server side. If that is possible? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Street-wise -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Where are the three users located, server-wise and network-wise? - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar. I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec. UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar. So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the permission on their calendar, and UserA UserC are both listed with Reviewer permissions. Is this setting also stored on the server side? Man I am beat down today, please help? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Outlook XP Calendar
Ahh! Where can I set this permission? AD or ESM? - John Q - Original Message - From: Ryan Malayter [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 4:13 PM Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Not only is zis possible, zis is ESSENTIAL! -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 5:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Same internal LAN. Same server. Legacy system, this is an old admin account. It's possible he hid it from the server side. If that is possible? - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:06 PM Subject: RE: Outlook XP Calendar Street-wise -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar Where are the three users located, server-wise and network-wise? - Original Message - From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: Re: Outlook XP Calendar I am attempting to figure out why a user can not see another users calendar. I know what everyone is thinking right now. . . but give me 1 sec. UserA can not see UserB's calendar but UserC can see userB's calendar. So I figure it is a permissions issue I go into UserB's sytem to see the permission on their calendar, and UserA UserC are both listed with Reviewer permissions. Is this setting also stored on the server side? Man I am beat down today, please help? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DCOM Error in Event Viewer
My E2K server SP2, on win 2K server also SP2 continues to lock up when I
attempt to start the MS Exchange Information store service.
The event viewer has hundreds of DCOM Event ID 10002 errors.
The DCOM server can not be located. The server is: {xx}
I looked them up but there is nothing that realtes.
Disabeled Trend scan mail.
ANy ideas on what I can do?
- John Q Jr.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: DCOM Error in Event Viewer
Looks like it was a issue with SP2 and TrendMicroScanMail.
If you install SP2 after installing Scanmail this issue can occur.
When I disabeled ScanMail it did not work but when i removed scanmail from
the rigistry it did
- John Q Jr.
- Original Message -
From: John Q Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: DCOM Error in Event Viewer
My E2K server SP2, on win 2K server also SP2 continues to lock up when I
attempt to start the MS Exchange Information store service.
The event viewer has hundreds of DCOM Event ID 10002 errors.
The DCOM server can not be located. The server is: {xx}
I looked them up but there is nothing that realtes.
Disabeled Trend scan mail.
ANy ideas on what I can do?
- John Q Jr.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS InformationStore service
After a hard reboot my E2K SP2 server on Windows 2K, The system then hangs and I can not log-in. When looking at the services from a remote computer, the MS Informatio Store service is in continual Starting mode. Any ideas, Any help? - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MS InformationStore service
That did it! Thanks! Why does that work, DC communication issue. Just curious? - John Q Jr. - Original Message - From: Amit Zinman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 10:16 AM Subject: RE: MS InformationStore service Restart it, disconnected from the network. Then connect and start the services. Amit Zinman MCSE, Project Manager Professional Services Group Getronics (Israel) Tel: +972-3-5127306 Mobile: +972-53-570139 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 7:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MS InformationStore service After a hard reboot my E2K SP2 server on Windows 2K, The system then hangs and I can not log-in. When looking at the services from a remote computer, the MS Informatio Store service is in continual Starting mode. Any ideas, Any help? - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Anonymous group, in Client
I have a user who deleted their Anonymous account in the Calendar properties, but when I try to add it is is not listed in any of the groups. Any idea on how to get arround this? - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Child domain setup
I am attempting to install E2K Enterprise in a child domain, but when I attempt to install in the child domain I get a lack of permission error. This is due to my account not being part of the Domain Adim and Enter. Admin groups in the parent domain. So here is my question, If i install E2K on a system in the child domain with an account in the parent domain, the two have a two way trust, will I have any issues? Now for all you asking why not just add my child domain acct. to the parent domain Doamin Admin and Ent. Admin groups. I can't just a stipulation of the enviroemnt. - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Front-end back-end
What method are you using to transfer messages from the front-end systems to the back? Did you check DNS? - John Q - Original Message - From: Bravo, Liliana [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: Front-end back-end Hi MSX2000, SP2 We have one fornt-ened server and two back-end servers the mailboxes in the bak-end servers are not receiving email messages we have noticed that the front-end server build the queue up to the respective bak-end server but the message never arrives to the back-end but a NDR is received by the internet sender. If we check the details for those messages builiding up in the front-end the details say : mailloop misconfigured. Are we loosing any a must configuration to properly route messages front Front-end to back-end? note: messages sent from back-end mailboxes to internet are ok. Rgds, -er _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Child domain setup
I hear ya' Ed, thanks. I am working on getting proper rights. But the tech lead on this, wants to know if E2K can be installed in the child domain using the parent domain account.* (* I don't know!) Now for the forest/domain structure is as follows; 2 domains 1 parent 1 child both domains are in the same forest, thus giving them the trust. What other domain/forest info can I provide? - John Q - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:53 PM Subject: RE: Child domain setup Inline. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 11:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Child domain setup I am attempting to install E2K Enterprise in a child domain, but when I attempt to install in the child domain I get a lack of permission error. This is due to my account not being part of the Domain Adim and Enter. Admin groups in the parent domain. I think what you really need is an account with Exchange Full Administrator. So here is my question, If i install E2K on a system in the child domain with an account in the parent domain, the two have a two way trust, If they're in the same forest, then they have a two-way trust. If you're mentioning trusts, then I'm suspicious that your domain isn't in the forest. will I have any issues? That I can't say, because you haven't described your forest and domain structure. Now for all you asking why not just add my child domain acct. to the parent domain Doamin Admin and Ent. Admin groups. I can't just a stipulation of the enviroemnt. I think you need to get the power to be to give your account Exchange Full Administrator permissions in the Administrative Group in which you are trying to install it. - John Q Jr. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
