RE: Alternatives to pst
I have used the Assentor product for SEC compliance but not the archiving product. They just came out with some new stuff. Might be worth looking at, not sure about pricing though. From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Alternatives to pst Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:07:56 -0600 What are some of the products that people are using as centrailized vault storage for long time email retention? We know about KVS, but what others are out there that people have used and have good or bad results with? Milt _ Check out the new MSN 9 Dial-up fast reliable Internet access with prime features! http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-uspage=dialup/homeST=1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-uspage=byoa/premST=1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Lost mailbox
Not sure what happened to answer your first question. But you can not restore a single mailbox from backup unless you use bricklevel backup method. Restore DB to a recovery box then run exmerge is the one way. From: Kim Schotanus [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Lost mailbox Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:45:08 +0100 Hi there I have an urgent question. I came in this morning and found the AD completely blocked because surveyor.exe was taking up all memory resources on the DC. After rebooting the memory use went back to normal and users could log to the network. Unfortunately when our director booted his PC his account was deleted from the mailbox store,and despite our retention policy immediately deleted. Question 1: how is this possible? Question 2: How do I restore 1 single mailbox from a tape? Thanks for your help, Kim _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-uspage=byoa/premST=1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: smtp receives but stops sending
I had a customer run into the same issue. Althoug still not resolved the last time I spoke with them they tried all of the things you mentioned. They where running TrendMicro. Please post if you finally resolve it. From: Mark Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: smtp receives but stops sending Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:10:52 - Hi, I think I am probably the poster you are refering to. We haven't posted the fix because we still haven't resolved it. Since my last posting on this thread, we have tried running without the Sophos MailMonitor anti-virus and also without the GFI MailEssentials. The problems continued while these were not running. We have also rebuilt the entire server as a virgin install of win2003 and Ex2003 (the original was a win2000/Ex2000 upgraded to 2003). Again it made no difference. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley [MVP] Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 3:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: smtp receives but stops sending The poster, as is often the case, didn't respond with what fixed the problem. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthew Joyce Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: smtp receives but stops sending Hi, I found a thread, titled as above, via a google, I'm just curious what the resolution was (if any) I have recently install Exchange 2003 and today, I found a bunch of messages waiting for submission. The SMTP service would not stop. I followed the threads procedure. Disable SMTP service Restart server Move messages from queue Start service feed back messages this seems to have worked, but the whole incident has spawned a constant niggling doubt. I have not done anything to change the setup, so presumably this can happen again anytime. There was talk of it being AV related, I have a trial of GFI Mail Security running, I'd like to be able to know if it is the AV product or a generic problem with the AV/Exchange interface. Any ideas ? Thanks Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ There are now three new levels of MSN Hotmail Extra Storage! Learn more. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-uspage=hotmail/es2ST=1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: Electronic Forms
Might want to look at www.slipstick.com From: Mark Condron [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Electronic Forms Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:20:39 - All, We extensively use MS Electronic Forms/Forms Designer here, I would be grateful if someone could point me in the right direction on how the forms could be used to populate a database as well as being delivered to the relevant public folder for action. Does anyone know of a good resource (book/website) regarding electronic forms? I have googled without much luck. I would also be grateful for advice on any third party products you guys use to achieve what can be done with electronic forms. We are a non-profit organisation so cost is an issue. TIA -Mark Wales Council for Voluntary Action (WCVA) Registered Charity: 21809 Company Limited by Guarantee: 425299 Registered in Wales -- -- CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the recipient(s) only. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately and destroy the material whether stored on a computer or otherwise. -- DISCLAIMER: Any views or opinions presented within this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Wales Council for Voluntary Action, unless otherwise specipically stated. -- Wales Council for Voluntary Action, Baltic House, Mount Stuart Square, Cardiff , UK, CF10 5FH Registered Charity: 21809 Company Limited by Guarantee: 425299 Registered in Wales Reception (Head Office): 029 2043 1700 Help Desk: 0870 607 1666 Fax: 029 2043 1701 Minicom: 029 2043 1702 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: www.wcva.org.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Learn how to choose, serve, and enjoy wine at Wine @ MSN. http://wine.msn.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Recipient Policies
When you create a new mailbox the smtp address doesn't get show until the user logs in although the address is valid. Not sure if this applies to new addresses set by new recipient policies. Did you try sending to a user to see if it goes through? From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Recipient Policies Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:34:28 -0500 Anything in the event log? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Protecting the world from PSTs and bricked backups. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hutchins, Mike Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 12:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Recipient Policies E2K SP3 W2K SP3 Any idea why I can't add an smtp address to every mailbox in the org? I am trying to add it to the default policy then apply the ppolicy, and it isn't working.. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-uspage=byoa/premST=1 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange 2000 DR
You have valid Domain controller inplace at your test site or are you testing that part also. MS has a rather lenghty indepth white paper that spells out all of the steps and requirements. From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 2000 DR Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:21:02 -0600 All, We are about to do an off-site DR exercise. This DR site (for the test) will have no connectivity to our production environment. I have 2 domains (bm.root - which is an empty forest root placeholder domain) - (bakernet.com - peer domain to bm.root where all objects live). The Exchange server (member of bakernet.com) that will used for the DR exercise (Exchange 2000 SP 3) is on a Windows 2000 SP 3 Domain controller (bakernet.com). I have ran the Veritas IDR process on the server and have identical hardware at the DR site for the restore. Question: Will services fail because the forest root domain (bm.root) can not be contacted? Or do I need to also do a DR of a bm.root Domain controller at the DR site? I have done numerous IDR recoveries, but have all been on the production network where the bm.root domain could be contacted I hope this makes sense! Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access limited time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: unhold
DePlane From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: unhold Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:03:01 -0800 DeFlowers -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anthony Sollars Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 12:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DePants -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unhold DeThong -Original Message- From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unhold Unhold _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Expand your wine savvy and get some great new recipes at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs
AM I missing something here. Are you saying you want to limit your DB's to a certain size. Maybe I am crazy but you can only limit indvidual mailboxes sizes via property settings or policies, right? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:04 -0500 At the current place, we have a separate DB for execs. It was not my idea. I am not sure if I would do it this way - put all execs in one basket... that's an easy way to piss off all the execs at once if something happens. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs That's what my 20GB was set for. I was just wondering as far as how you split up your DBs if you do at all. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds and base the DB size on that. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config. Currently we have 3 DBs. 1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB). The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB. I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that idea was soon realized to created trouble since we have people who shuffle around a lot here. What are larger orgs like some of you doing with your config? I was thinking company Dbs with a 20GB limit. After the 20GB was reached I would then create a second instance of the same company DB2 and so on for all of our companies. Just looking for some input an recommendations of what is the best practice. Thanks. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ Working moms: Find helpful tips here on managing kids, home, work and yourself. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/workingmom.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs
Ok the last place I was at they created multiple DB's based on sizes ranging from 100MB to 500MB for the mailbox limits which were set by policies. If your really worried about DB's getting too big maybe a archiving solution would be a worth look at. From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:35:09 -0500 Not a hard limit, I just want to cut off creating users on that store when I reach that limit to keep the DB size down. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 11:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs AM I missing something here. Are you saying you want to limit your DB's to a certain size. Maybe I am crazy but you can only limit indvidual mailboxes sizes via property settings or policies, right? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:39:04 -0500 At the current place, we have a separate DB for execs. It was not my idea. I am not sure if I would do it this way - put all execs in one basket... that's an easy way to piss off all the execs at once if something happens. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs That's what my 20GB was set for. I was just wondering as far as how you split up your DBs if you do at all. Thanks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2k3 store configs I would first make sure that I am comfortable with backup/restore speeds and base the DB size on that. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2k3 store configs I am setting up a plan to restructure our exchange DB config. Currently we have 3 DBs. 1 with a mix of companies that is very large (65GB). The others are 4 to 5GB a piece and are one Exec DB and one company DB. I started to go the departmental route to separate DBs, but then that idea was soon realized to created trouble since we have people who shuffle around a lot here. What are larger orgs like some of you doing with your config? I was thinking company Dbs with a 20GB limit. After the 20GB was reached I would then create a second instance of the same company DB2 and so on for all of our companies. Just looking for some input an recommendations of what is the best practice. Thanks. Michael Woodruff System Administrator inChord Communications Inc. A group of communications companies providing clients unlimited visibility 614.543.6405 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe
RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Is his version of IE the same as yours? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: looking for a scientific explanation I have a very strange issue. All of our users use OWA 2000 without problems, except one. He is at a third-party location (customer site) which apparently has a firewall (no one knows what kind). When this user sends mail from OWA, Symantec Antivirus for Exchange detects that the message has an unscannable attachment and shoots him a warning. When I log into OWA as this user on my PC and send mail, no problems. Can a firewall stuff something into an outgoing OWA message that would cause antivirus to trip? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Contacts Folder
What are you trying to accomplish? From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Archiving Contacts Folder Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:20:22 -0800 Hello. Is it possible to archive/auto-archive your Contacts folder? If so, how? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Archiving Contacts Folder
The quick answer is no. Ask yourself what criteria would you use? Archiving is by size date etc. From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Archiving Contacts Folder Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:51:54 -0800 I have a user who is trying to add her contacts to her archive folder. There isn't an archive option under the properties for Contacts. Manually archiving didn't work either. I just wanted to verify that archiving Contacts wasn't possible. You would either have to do an export or manual copy. What are you trying to accomplish? From: Farquharson, Andrea [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Archiving Contacts Folder Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:20:22 -0800 Hello. Is it possible to archive/auto-archive your Contacts folder? If so, how? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: looking for a scientific explanation
Does the user have a signature they use? If so maybe something in it causes it to trip. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:13:06 -0500 According the info I was able to get out of him, yes. When I check the IS Logons in ESM when the user is logged on, I can see two lines for him. One says HTTP and the other one says Win32. I only expected to see HTTP, I wonder what Win32 means in this context. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Is his version of IE the same as yours? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: looking for a scientific explanation I have a very strange issue. All of our users use OWA 2000 without problems, except one. He is at a third-party location (customer site) which apparently has a firewall (no one knows what kind). When this user sends mail from OWA, Symantec Antivirus for Exchange detects that the message has an unscannable attachment and shoots him a warning. When I log into OWA as this user on my PC and send mail, no problems. Can a firewall stuff something into an outgoing OWA message that would cause antivirus to trip? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Expand your wine savvy and get some great new recipes at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: looking for a scientific explanation
You are correct. Some cut and paste to achieve a signature type effect. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 16:23:53 -0500 Wait... OWA 2000 doesn't have an option for automatic signature. But most of his sent messages end with the same exact words. -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Nice idea! I didn't think about that. Thanks! It does look like he has a signature, but it looks like it's just plain text. Maybe he pasted something funky there that can't even be seen... Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 4:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Does the user have a signature they use? If so maybe something in it causes it to trip. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:13:06 -0500 According the info I was able to get out of him, yes. When I check the IS Logons in ESM when the user is logged on, I can see two lines for him. One says HTTP and the other one says Win32. I only expected to see HTTP, I wonder what Win32 means in this context. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: looking for a scientific explanation Is his version of IE the same as yours? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov, Andrey Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: looking for a scientific explanation I have a very strange issue. All of our users use OWA 2000 without problems, except one. He is at a third-party location (customer site) which apparently has a firewall (no one knows what kind). When this user sends mail from OWA, Symantec Antivirus for Exchange detects that the message has an unscannable attachment and shoots him a warning. When I log into OWA as this user on my PC and send mail, no problems. Can a firewall stuff something into an outgoing OWA message that would cause antivirus to trip? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Expand your wine savvy - and get some great new recipes - at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Take advantage of our limited-time introductory offer for dial-up Internet access. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup
RE: getting heaps of spams
Sounds like you in need of a spam solution. From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:16:15 -0800 (PST) Ed, thanks for your response. Getting spams on my exchange is a daily retual to me, however, not as much as 4000 or more spam emails withing the hour. Last time, when i had such a high volume of spam, we had a look at \\exchange server\tracking.log and figured out that one of the exchange server within the enterprise had open for relaying. I can't remember now how we worked it out then, but probably experienced heaps of entries from the spamming exchange server. Hope i am making sense. --- Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can be completely relay secure yet get bombarded with spam. All Exchange servers will let spam through. Looking at the Internet headers of each message will show the stamps of the servers which handled the message. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: getting heaps of spams i have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on win 2k sp4. We have number of exchanges around the globe that has trusts between them. I am currently getting tens of thausands of spam email, however my exchange is tested and has no relying problem. I am expecting one of the exchange servers within the global enterprise is open to relying. Can someone tell me how i can check which exchange server letting all these spam email to drain to my server? thank you all in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 http://search.yahoo.com/top2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Expand your wine savvy and get some great new recipes at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: getting heaps of spams
Only have experience with Trend Micro and Symantec products. From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:29:55 -0800 (PST) What is your opinion on gfi? many thanks --- Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds like you in need of a spam solution. From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: getting heaps of spams Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:16:15 -0800 (PST) Ed, thanks for your response. Getting spams on my exchange is a daily retual to me, however, not as much as 4000 or more spam emails withing the hour. Last time, when i had such a high volume of spam, we had a look at \\exchange server\tracking.log and figured out that one of the exchange server within the enterprise had open for relaying. I can't remember now how we worked it out then, but probably experienced heaps of entries from the spamming exchange server. Hope i am making sense. --- Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can be completely relay secure yet get bombarded with spam. All Exchange servers will let spam through. Looking at the Internet headers of each message will show the stamps of the servers which handled the message. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jees Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 5:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: getting heaps of spams i have exchange 5.5 sp4 running on win 2k sp4. We have number of exchanges around the globe that has trusts between them. I am currently getting tens of thausands of spam email, however my exchange is tested and has no relying problem. I am expecting one of the exchange servers within the global enterprise is open to relying. Can someone tell me how i can check which exchange server letting all these spam email to drain to my server? thank you all in advance __ Do you Yahoo!? Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 http://search.yahoo.com/top2003 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Expand your wine savvy and get some great new recipes at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the Signing Bonus Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Have fun customizing MSN Messenger learn how here! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_customize _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List
RE: Queues - Outbound mail Not Going
try using a telnet session to send a test email to an outside account From: Paul M. Done [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Queues - Outbound mail Not Going Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 10:11:14 -0800 I am tying to help a fellow Exchange Admin (blind leading the blind). Running a Ex 5.5 Sp4 on Nt4 box with DNS routing, outbound mail is not going out. Inbound mail is received via .forward from a campus server. DNS entries correctly point to and from box, IMS is installed and configured exactly as before. Any ideas why outbound mail will not go. Tried going to the Queues in the IMS properties. Where I am use to seeing a pulldown box, his is gray with no option to pull down. Paul Done _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Make your home warm and cozy this winter with tips from MSN House Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restricting User
Is this for internal email messages within your org. Which version of Exchange? From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Restricting User Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 12:30:08 +0500 Dear List, How can I restrict a user to send mail only to a particular users. How can I accomplish this? Is there any way of doing it? Thanks in Advance. regards, irf. This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.1/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Removing/Deleting Message
Exmerge will work also. It is on your Exchange CD or downlod it from MS From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Removing/Deleting Message Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 18:06:55 -0800 Isscan may help. Its free. http://www.softlookup.com/download/down10498.html -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Faust Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 5:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Removing/Deleting Message Question: Is there a way to delete a message from a 5.5 SP4 IS? The recall message in Outlook only provides the option. Our Unix admin did a reply to all instead of a forward and sent a bad word to the entire company. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restricting User
This came up as a requrest for one client. I left before I got a chance to help but thought by creating a routing group and restrict that way but not sure it will work depending on where all the user in question reside. Maybe a 3rd party tool From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Restricting User Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2004 09:38:35 +0500 I forgot to mention we are using exchange 2000 sp3. yes Tony for internal users. Thanks for ur reply. regards, irf. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2004 9:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restricting User Is this for internal email messages within your org. Which version of Exchange? From: Exchange List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Restricting User Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2004 12:30:08 +0500 Dear List, How can I restrict a user to send mail only to a particular users. How can I accomplish this? Is there any way of doing it? Thanks in Advance. regards, irf. This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.1/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This email and any files transmitted with it is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error pleaes notify the sender or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] The message and attachment, if any, has been scanned for all known viruses, however we advice the recipient to check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, UBL accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.2/1/2004 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Expand your wine savvy and get some great new recipes at MSN Wine. http://wine.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Personal folders
Document Settings| Old Profile Folder set-- look there for the old pst and copy to the new folder created by the new profile From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Personal folders Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:25:16 -0800 Does anyone know when a user has a new windows profile, why they can't access thier personal folder. Some windows profiles was change and when you add their pst to their OutLook profile and try to open it , it give an error permission denied, and they are logging in with thier new windows profile? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Check your PC for viruses with the FREE McAfee online computer scan. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ?
I would search the MS Exchange site for deployment scenario's and what is allowed and not allowed as far as in-place verses move method. There are probably more steps you haven't considered. From: Walden H. Leverich III [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Ex 5.5 - 2003 Move Process. Using EC method, which box gets 2003 ? Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 11:58:33 -0500 All, I've asked a similar question before, but that was 5.5 - 2000 and we didn't end up moving. So: I'm looking to move from 5.5 - 2003. At the end of the process I'll be running 2003 on the same physical box I'm now running 5.5 on. However, I don't want to do an in place upgrade so I'll be using a variation on the famous, should be patented, wonderful Ed Crowley method. I'll bring up a second server, move the mailboxes (public folder, GAL, etc.) to that new box then redo the old box as a 2003 server and move everything back. Here's the question: One of these moves will need to be from 5.5 - 2003, which? I could install 2003 on the temp box, and do the 5.5-2003 upgrade on the first move. Or I could install 5.5 on the temp box and do the upgrade on the move from the temp box back to the real box. I'm leaning toward making the temp box a 5.5 box. I've done 5.5-5.5 moves before so I know that's a snap. Also, If I make the original box the first 2003 server in the enterprise I won't have to deal with tearing down the first 2003 server right away. Thoughts? -Walden Walden H Leverich III President Tech Software (516) 627-3800 x11 (208) 692-3308 eFax [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.TechSoftInc.com Quiquid latine dictum sit altum viditur. (Whatever is said in Latin seems profound.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get reliable dial-up Internet access now with our limited-time introductory offer. http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Go back to your on-time on-budget 50 user projects, that are done in the most ethical way. From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:20:54 -0800 I can understand that you are obviously too immature to own up to the fact that you are the one that instigates these discussions and then turn around and accuse others of instigating such discussions. I can also understand that when you have nothing to say that you post what you consider to be philosophical or poetic statements when in fact you are posting meaningless dribble that makes you look like an...well, let's just stick with immature. ...makes you look immature. Not only can't you prove the obvious, you can't understand the obvious. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Ed, this is so utterly wrong that it defies all rational thought. Yes, you first stated something along the lines of Why are you asking us vendor wh0res. And I ignored this post and simply asked you to play nice. The thread continued, still largely the topic of migrating from GroupWise 6.5 to Exchange 2000. Then, you posted this next little gem, and I quote: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:52:58 -0800 For those of you who haven't been around, Mr. Greg Deckler has repeatedly broadcast his diatribes that those of us who are MVPs should be likened to employees (his word) of Microsoft and anything we tell you should be considered to be propaganda straight from Bill Gates. Well, my response is the kind of unprofessional response he deserves, having made his bed. Sorry to have troubled the rest of you. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! Now, to this I simply had to respond because this is a blatant mis-characterization of my position. Yes, I believe that accepting titles from vendors is not only wrong, but extremely damaging to the IT community at large in the eyes of the public that we serve. My response to you corrected your mis-characterization of my position and indicated that yes, we have different opinions on this topic, but that we should at least be able to be civil. From this, then, the whole topic disintegrated into misery. Thus, it is a proven FACT that you, not I, started this entire re-hashed discussion about ethics in IT. Could I have ignored your post. Perhaps, but I am simply not going to allow such a blatant mis-characterization of my beliefs to go unchallenged. Now, given these facts, I could easily make the call you a liar. But, I am not going to tell you that. I am going to tell you that you are wrong, because you are and I can prove absolutely that you are wrong. But, I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt, show some civility and not claim that you are *purposefully* posting incorrect and wrong information. Instead, I prefer to believe that you simply are not recollecting things correctly. You brought up the this topic of ethics, you mis-characterized my position, you brought up a discussion now 8 years dead, you kept on hounding me until I was forced to respond. You, you, you and finally, you. It's all you man. So why did you feel the need to change the thread to post the exact same nonsense you've been spouting all along? Don't say that we keep bringing this up. All I in the second post in the original thread was that I'm a vendor whore. You took over and started with your silly, unjustified position. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Make your home warm and cozy this winter with tips from MSN House Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating LN6 to Exchange 2003
there are 3rd party tools on MS's Exchange site. I have used a couple on LN5 and seem to be okay. it depends on exactly what you want to migrate. Reoccurring calendar items are always a pain. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Migrating LN6 to Exchange 2003 Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 13:43:38 -0500 I think there are better tools out there for LN to Exchange migration. I have not been in that scene for a while, can't remember right off the top of my head. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov, Exchange MVP Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 1:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Migrating LN6 to Exchange 2003 I almost cringe as I write this post... Does anyone have any experience or knowledge in migrating a LN6 environment to Exchange 2003 using the Exchange Migration Wizard? If so, are there any tips or information that you could provide either to say, This is how I got it to work or I tried it and it doesn't work, don't bother. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Worried about inbox overload? Get MSN Extra Storage now! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Thanks alot guys. You have me considereing to start smoking again and drink more than socially From: Steve Hanna [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:41:40 -0500 Dude, STFU --steve -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Yes, really. Laws are designed to define the floor. Ethics are designed to define the ceiling. No, I am simply someone that has a particular view of things that people seem to be utterly fascinated with and keep bringing it up. I am not a spokesman, I have an opinion. I have come to my conclusions about you because all I see is talk, talk, talk in your posts but nothing substantive. I have yet to see you make an intelligent comment or argument yet. A personal attack from me goes so much deeper, but I'll leave that be. On to bigger and brighter things!!! And ethics are not passed as laws. There is no law that a company's employees cannot accept gifts. The ethics that lawyers and doctors follow are also not laws. Oh really! This discussion is about the IT industry, as a whole or in part, deciding what is and is not ethical. We, as an industry, do that, not a legislative body. Now we're getting somewhere!!! Tell me Greg, are YOU the spokesman for the IT industry? Does the IT industry have party affiliations? Are Ed and the rest of the MVP's the Liberal's in this case where you're the Conservative? Who voted you to be the spokesman for the IT industry and why didn't I/we get to vote? Look, it is obvious that you are discussing something that you have not bothered educate yourself on, are not being honest in your criticism,...(bunch of other shinola) Not educated on Ethics? Oh, I'm very educated in many things, IT just happens to be one of them. I'm just interested in how you came to these conclusions, actual facts to backup your statements, and anyone else who follows your beliefs if that is what you want to call them... NEXT! -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 What was it then, a compliment? You cannot even be honest in your criticism. And ethics are not passed as laws. There is no law that a company's employees cannot accept gifts. The ethics that lawyers and doctors follow are also not laws. This discussion is about the IT industry, as a whole or in part, deciding what is and is not ethical. We, as an industry, do that, not a legislative body. Look, it is obvious that you are discussing something that you have not bothered educate yourself on, are not being honest in your criticism, have nothing to say and simply want to argue for the sake of arguing. So, that being said, yes, you are brilliant and you win. Happy? Oh, that was not a personal attack... And I don't lose arguments... I tell ya what. You find me the documentation to support your claim for our industry and I might be inclined to believe you. I'll need actual laws passed by Federal/Local Governments or a consortium of some kind AND any cases that were brought to trial on this subject. Please provide these details in a time stamped format so I can see at what point in time these laws went into effect... There ARE laws on the books regarding this perceived ethical violation, right? Everyone should probably cease assisting you with your Groupwise migration since it might get those of us who are not MVP's nominated for such things and it would be unethical of us to assist you. So, please stop asking for help as the answers we provide will be unethical in nature... -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Personal attacks are generally the clearest sign that someone has lost an argument and has nothing better to say. So now I am a wife beater, a liar, I starve children and I get beat up a lot. I keep learning things about myself that I never knew before, I love this list. You got beat up a lot in High School didn't you... You should have asked them (while being beaten to a pulp) to leave you some brain cells to operate with... _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: OT: company question
Nope From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: company question Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:21:41 -0500 Has anyone heard anything about this company called CITCO (not the oil and gas Citgo), but CITCO Group - http://www.citco.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Take advantage of our best MSN Dial-up offer of the year six months @$9.95/month. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OT: HP USPS
Anyone here involved on the HP/USPS Exchange project? Contact me offlist? _ Cell phone switch rules are taking effect find out more here. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
My head hurts. That's a fact From: Greg Deckler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:50:03 -0800 In my opinion, there are those with the opinion that stating anything as a fact and not an opinion is abrasive and rude. In my opinion, this opinion is absurd because it is fundamentally understood that anything that comes out of anyone's mouth is simply an opinion and not a fact. In my opinion, there may be some people with the opinion that people should not go around stating their opinions. But, in my opinion, everyone has opinions and it gets rather monotonous and boring to keep stating in my opinion all the time when, in my opinion, it should be understood that everything is an opinion. In my opinion, people have opinions about lots of things that they consider facts. In my opinion, there are many that hold the opinion that the earth is round. But, in my opinion, this is simply an opinion as, in my opinion, there are others that hold the opinion that the earth is flat. In my opinion, this all depends on your opinion of the words earth, round and flat. In my opinion, if, in your opinion, the word round refers to a 2-dimensional circular object, then, in my opinion, your opinion would be that the earth is not round since, in my opinion, your opinion would be that the earth would be a sphere, and not round. Of couse, in my opinion, if your opinion was that a sphere is perfectly symmetrical such that all points on its surface are equal distance from its center, then, in my opinion, your opinion about the earth being a sphere might be wrong since, in my opinion, there are those that hold the opinion that the earth is not a perfect sphere but is actually a bit elliptical in shape. In addition, in my opinion, there are elevation variations on the surface of the earth as well which would mean that, in my opinion, the earth does not meet the definition of a sphere if your opinion is that a sphere means that all points on the surface of a 3-d object are equal distance from its center. Now, of course, in my opinion, this is all just my opinion. But, in my opinion, the bigger concern here is that, in your opinion, are you happy now? I was not arguing with you about the symantics between fact opinion, just rather pointing out that you tend to assert your opinions as fact. That is a very abrasive personality trait and probably explains why the discussion list has reacted to you the way that they have. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Cell phone switch rules are taking effect find out more here. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients?
Search under SIS From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Impact of sending attachment to many recipients? Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 02:54:59 -0800 Hi, Let's say a user sends a 1Mb attachment by email to 1000 people, does it add 1000Mb to the Exchange Database? I put out a post like this before the replies were negative. But now a friend pointed out that a recipient who has a mailbox on the Exchange Server could for example open this email change it. Then save it (i.e. the email was changed). So he's saying that this shows that each person gets their personal copy of the email. Therefore, the 1Mb attachment in the email to 1000 people DOES increase the Exchange Database size by 1000Mb. Pls. can you shed some light on this discussion for us? I'd appreciate some official article from Microsoft (e.g. Technet) to prove my point. Help! Thanks in advance. Pls. Cc all replies to me on: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Cell phone switch rules are taking effect find out more here. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/consumeradvocate.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Deleting remotely from another Outlook instance
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;262399Product=exch2k From: Erik L. Vesneski [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Deleting remotely from another Outlook instance Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:00:38 -0800 Heya, I have a situation. On Win2k Exchange 2k. With Outlook I open another person's email mailbox as requested by legal and management. I delete out the item however how do I permanently delete that deleted item without changing their pw and logging in as them. I do have OWA in place too. Thanks, Erik L. Vesneski Intel Lead - WCDC/ISO www.pmigroup.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
The link is wrapped From: Jees [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 17:21:38 -0800 (PST) Eric, i get an error msg when following this link The download you requested is unavailable. If you continue to see this message when trying to access this download, you might try the Search for a Download area on the Download Center home page --- Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's the link to download the DR whitepaper from Microsoft http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=df586628-3abe-40c3- 8e8f-beb4122de3d7displaylang=en Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Hank Arnold [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 3:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I finally found the Disaster Recovery Whitepaper Erik was talking about. I will stop asking questions about DR methods. Eric Fretz Could you post the URL? I'm always interested in finding better ways to provide disaster recovery. By the way, we do a full NTBACKUP every night to hard drive. We then do a tape backup every night (full on Fridays and incremental other night) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MB! in address list.
I was aslked by a fellow consultant as to why some mailboxes have MBX:1 addresses in the address list. Not all mailboxes have this address. Just some. Since he took over he is not sure how they got there. I thought it depends on the mail enviornment when created. He tried creating a new mailbox and it did not have a MBX record. Any ideas why some have it and not all. Also what does the MBX address mean? _ Tired of slow downloads and busy signals? Get a high-speed Internet connection! Comparison-shop your local high-speed providers here. https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: MB! in address list.
nevermind. Figured it out. MBX's are put inby Mailbox Manager. MBX1 means do not delete From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: MB! in address list. Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 13:32:53 -0500 I was aslked by a fellow consultant as to why some mailboxes have MBX:1 addresses in the address list. Not all mailboxes have this address. Just some. Since he took over he is not sure how they got there. I thought it depends on the mail enviornment when created. He tried creating a new mailbox and it did not have a MBX record. Any ideas why some have it and not all. Also what does the MBX address mean? _ Tired of slow downloads and busy signals? Get a high-speed Internet connection! Comparison-shop your local high-speed providers here. https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange client or mapi
Is Outlook loaded on the server? Outlook loaded on an Exchange server was not recommended. Not sure if this has changed. If yhou insist on using Arcserve and need a MAPI client try and find Exchange Client 32. That is safe to use From: Ronald Mazzotta [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange client or mapi Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 12:55:00 -0500 When I try to create a mapi profile on my exchange 2003 server it pops up the outlook express profiler instead of the mapi profiler. Is there a way to change this. I need a profile for Arcserves alert service. Ronald R. Mazzotta Jr. Director of IT Schonbraun Safris McCann Bekritsky Co. L.L.C. 101 Eisenhower pky Roseland NJ, 07068 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Shop online for kids toys by age group, price range, and toy category at MSN Shopping. No waiting for a clerk to help you! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: S/MIME
which client will be signing the message? Also which version of Exchange From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: S/MIME Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 13:39:45 -0500 All, I'm trying to setup S/MIME since we all of a sudden require message security within our organization. I'm trying to get an understanding on how this works in the real world. I've setup a test lab here at work. But that can only help me understand how to get things done internally. I'm looking at a braoder scope of allowing our messages to be secure while passing over the internet to other corporations etc. Can someone point me in the direction on what I need to read to understand this a little bit better I'd really appreciate it. Also, if anyone wants to contact me offline. I have a few questions that I'd like answered if you have time. TIA, _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Dont worry if your Inbox will max out while you are enjoying the holidays. Get MSN Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
Keep in mind that full and incremental Exchange aware backup software will delete trans logs. Diffs do not. And re-read the disaster recovery papers for backup scenarios that fit your site From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:27:09 -0600 What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get holiday tips for festive fun. http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Backup rituals
If you have a issue that is one thing. But to ask us how to administer your infrastructure is another. If your new to Exchange then take some training courses first. Many of your questions as of late are basic. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Backup rituals Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:36:47 -0600 I'm using DLT 80/160 drives and tapes, so I've got the Tape space. I thought that daily full backups would just be a waste of tape space and time, but maybe not. Is your reason for doing full daily backups for quick recovery (e.g. reover from a single tape)??? Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Backup rituals I prefer full backup every day. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Backup rituals What backup rituals do you guys use on your Exchange sites? I've looked through the FAQs and read most of the relevant Microsoft Qxxx articles on Exchange administration, but I haven't found the way to do good backups. My first blush is to backup the entire databases + logs once a week and then backup the incremental changes to the logs daily. All suggestions, snide remarks and pithy one-liners are welcome... Thanks, Eric Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get holiday tips for festive fun. http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5
This has come up before on this list. Try searching the archives. When i get home tonight I will look in my personal archive I keep of fixes off this site. i think someone said that outlook 2003 doesn't like Exchange 5.5 or something like that. If I find it I will post. From: Will [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Outlook 2k3 on XP won't connect to My Exchange 5.5 Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 12:28:30 -0800 The XP firewall is OFF. (Have tried it both ways) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Winterize your home with tips from MSN House Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment, video game reviews, and more here. http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
If it is that bad then you might want to think of using exmerge to export the mailboxes to psts. Make sure you have plenty of room as you will loose SIS. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:01:18 -0600 Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment. This box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives. All it takes is one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am screwed. This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Yes, I know I need tape drives. Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange agent). Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment, video game reviews, and more here. http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
That is what a recovery server is for. Maybe a refresher on disaster recovery is in order. From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 08:08:52 -0600 I agree. Although, what happens when an idiot user trashes their inbox and then convienently forgets to tell me until after the 1 week retention period? Restoring the entire store would be a bad idea(tm) because it was set everybody back to the state the were in when the backup was made, right? I agree Brick backups are bad idea, I just don't have any better one's at the moment. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Ok, but what is BLB going to do for you? If you backup the whole store at once the normal way, you are going to be back up and running a heck of a lot faster than if you had to restore mailboxes one by one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment. This box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives. All it takes is one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am screwed. This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Yes, I know I need tape drives. Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange agent). Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail environment. Quit depending on it. http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxb.htm Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 For those of you with Veritas (Or Seagate) Backup Exec, I have a problem with restoring individual user mailboxes. Everytime I try to restore an individuals mailbox, the job copies 9088 bytes and then hangs. It never fails or gives an error message. My mail server is Exchange 5.5 standard running on a Windows 2000 Server (SP4) with Veritas Backup Exec v8.5. Thanks, Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe
RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5
Is this what Manna is? http://theory.stanford.edu/people/zm/ From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:26:56 -0500 It's raining Manna! Hallelujah! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 11:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 That's like manna from heaven! Thanks Erik. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Read, understand and read again the MS Exchange Backup and Disaster Recovery Whitepaper. Link to it is in the FAQ or is google-able. Then read it again. If you need to recover a single mailbox (a relatively unlikely occurrence if you follow the Ed Crowley Never Restore Method - also in the FAQ) you can do the full restore to another server, then extract out the needed mailbox and merge it into the live server store, affecting no other users. Read the Whitepaper! -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 9:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 I agree. Although, what happens when an idiot user trashes their inbox and then convienently forgets to tell me until after the 1 week retention period? Restoring the entire store would be a bad idea(tm) because it was set everybody back to the state the were in when the backup was made, right? I agree Brick backups are bad idea, I just don't have any better one's at the moment. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 8:06 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Ok, but what is BLB going to do for you? If you backup the whole store at once the normal way, you are going to be back up and running a heck of a lot faster than if you had to restore mailboxes one by one. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 6:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Murphy's law says that any working device can crap out and any moment. This box is running on a gateway 1U server with no RAID drives. All it takes is one hardware failure on a drive to take out the Private store and I am screwed. This company doesn't even have any tape drives that are large enough to hold a backup of the mailboxes. I've had to use Backup-to-disk folders on other servers to get space to hold the backups. Yes, I know I need tape drives. Yes, I know that I need backup exec 9 (and the exchange agent). Those are all planned purchased in Q1 of '04. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 It could tank at any moment then this means you should use brick level backups. Where did you hear that or am i missing something From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 07:35:21 -0600 I've inherited this IT environment and I can't spend any money until Jan. 5th. Oh, by the way, this exchange box as not been backed up since it was built 2.5 years ago! Brick backups are start because this box could tank at any moment. I'm purchasing Veritas BE 9 in January, but I cannot get it until then. I might have a trial copy of BE 9 and I can use until then, though. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Problems with Backup Exec 8.5 You're not going to like this answer, but brick backup is a great big kludgy crutch for administrators who insist on managing their Exchange environment like they would a Microsoft Mail
Re: Offline Global Address List
Yes use Outlook in offline mode. Then download Address book for use when offline. From: Michel Fayad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Offline Global Address List Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 13:09:58 +0200 Hi, Is there a way to configure Global Address list (Exchange 2000) to be accessed offline? Best Regards, Michel Fayad. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Set yourself up for fun at home! Get tips on home entertainment equipment, video game reviews, and more here. http://special.msn.com/home/homeent.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
Enterprise comes with the X.400 connector has standard. At least that is the way it was for 5.5 From: Eric Fretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:09:30 -0600 Is the size of the priv.edb and pub.edb the only difference between exchange standard and exchange enterprise? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:42 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Require all users to use POP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 5:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Groove on the latest from the hot new rock groups! Get downloads, videos, and more here. http://special.msn.com/entertainment/wiredformusic.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Phantom email address in Exchange Server
If 200 then use a LDAP or ADSIedit search for that object. From: Mike Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Phantom email address in Exchange Server Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:07:56 -0800 I'm trying to add the email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange Administrator tells me that the address is already in use in the organisation. If I send a test email to the address, I get a System Admin message informing me that the address does not exist. Does anybody know what I can do to remove the phantom reference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Is there a gadget-lover on your gift list? MSN Shopping has lined up some good bets! http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Private Store size problems.
One common way is to have the users delete any items in sent items that are not needed. From: trentwh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:12:06 -0600 If you don't have them already, set limits on mailboxes to a point where the store won't fill up. If you already have them, sounds like they need to be lowered. Start with those in a position to help you get Enterprise. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Eric Fretz Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. This definitely falls into the No crap category. If this were my box from the beginning, I would have used enterprise edition. I inherited this box and will be stuck with it until the end of the year. Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. The same thing that would have prevented the problem in the first place: install Enterprise Edition. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 9:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. Good points. I'm doing a full-court press to get us upgraded to Exchange 2000 Enterprise at the same time. As far as the temp drive goes, it is a 36GB 15k rpm drive, separate from the main storage volume. I'm averaging around 9 GB / hour, so I'm not far from the eseutil's theoretical maximum of 10 GB / hour. I guess I should be happy. My real question should have been this: What do you do when an offline defrag won't get Priv.edb filesize small enough to restart the Information Store? Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Private Store size problems. I'd continue to focus on purchasing the Enterprise version. What's the cost of yo0ur labor in doing the offline defrag? What's the cost to the company in the system downtime for you to do the defrag? What's the cost to the company of the system downtime if you do hit the 16GB limit? Then compare that to the cost of Enterprise Edition. You'd best delete things from the store while it is up and right before you do the offline defrag. You can also reduce the DIR time period so things get permanently deleted sooner. Speeding up offline defragmentation: This is a FAQ - the best you can do is put things on fast storage, make the temp drive a separate spindle from the live store. -Original Message- From: Eric Fretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 8:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Private Store size problems. My company has been reluctant to upgrade our exchange 5.5 standard server to 5.5 enterprise and because of this, I bump up against the 16 GB limit about every 20 days. Is there any way to access the Private store to prune (or even delete) oversize mailboxes while the store is offline? Also, is there any way to speed up eseutil while it's doing an offline defragmentation? Thanks Eric Fretz L-3 Communications ComCept Division 2800 Discovery Blvd. Rockwall, TX 75032 tel: 972.772.7501 fax: 972.772.7510 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
RE: lost in relay problem
In the Bad mail Que? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: lost in relay problem Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 07:59:34 -0700 Ok thats makes sense, sorry been pulling hair my hair out. But this leads me to another question, then email doesnt deliver to the external source. which is good. but it still hits my server and gets into the ques. This morning I came in and there were 26,000 NDR's waiting in the que. Which clogged the thing up and needed a boot so normal traffic could get going. Its become a constant babysitting problem. -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: lost in relay problem Eric, think about this for a minute. You are using an external host to send TO YOURSELF. Of course it is going to work. Your main server will accept ANY e-mail from ANYONE that is destined FOR your e-mail address. What you need to do to test it is re-read the instructions. It says quite clearly that that recipient should NOT be an address which the server accepts (I.e don't use your address). It should be an third party address, such as a hotmail address. Try it again. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:32 AM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: lost in relay problem Subject: lost in relay problem exch 5.5 w/sp4 First let me say i am sorry, cause i keep comming back and asking this. I MUST be missing something or just plai stupid, time to quit and go flip burgers. We have a mail server that is 5.5 smtp bridgehead ( 12.10.133.30 ) and in routing restrictions have hosts and clients checked. Using the following test http://members.iinet.net.au/~remmie/relay/ when i send it to myself [EMAIL PROTECTED] it WORKS and the email gets to me with the following... 220 postoffice02.aruplab.com ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service 5.5.2653.13) ready HELO staff.iinet.net.au 250 OK To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MAIL FROM: 250 OK - mail from RCPT TO: 250 OK - Recipient DATA 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF MESSAGE 250 OK SUCCESS Relay Accepted - final response code 250 Now if i change the TO address to a generic [EMAIL PROTECTED] address that I have setup, some other smtp recipent then my own it fails 5 times then suddenly works on the 6th, however the mail doesnt ever deliver. per the follwing... +5 of these To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 OK - Reset MAIL FROM: 250 OK - mail from RCPT TO: 550 Relaying is prohibited To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 250 OK - Reset MAIL FROM: 250 OK - mail from RCPT TO: 250 OK - Recipient DATA 354 Send data. End with CRLF.CRLF MESSAGE 250 OK SUCCESS In senario 2 I dont see how it can do a RCPT TO: and 550 - to - RCPT TO: 250 OK - Recipent. SO I AM CONFUSED ALL TO HELL. Is it like try this five times and on six it will work? And even if in senario 2 sending it to another server it never delivers doesnt it still sit on my server and eat up cpu/memory/disk? In senario 1 if the message is relayed to my server and to my clients it works right off the bat??!! i dont see how that is denying relaying? Doesnt that just open a huge window for asia-pacifica to spam my clients? Is there a way to plug this? sorry but i've made this so complex in my head it hurts. much thanks e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ From the hottest toys to tips on keeping fit this winter, youll find a range of helpful holiday info here. http://special.msn.com/network/happyholidays.armx _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface:
Re: IMC Archive Folder
From: Sean Faust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IMC Archive Folder Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:14:45 -0800 In the imcdata\in\ folder there is another subfolder called Archive and apparently there is a process that moves undeliverable mail I guess or something from the in and out folder to their respective archive folders. I am getting the following error message: 'Tue Nov 18 03:40:42 2003': MSExchangeIMC - The Internet Mail Service was unable to archive a message because MoveFile failed with error code 0x0020 while attempting to move C:_EXCHSRVR_imcdata_in_W6RLN7M1 to C:_EXCHSRVR_imcdata_in_Archive_W6RLN7M1. 'Tue Nov 18 03:40:42 2003': MSExchangeIMC - An error occurred while opening a temporary message file. Verify that the message spool directories are configured correctly and are readable by the Internet Mail Service. In Exchsrvr\imcdata\in there is the file that corresponds to the name in the above messages. The exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive directory is full of files with dates going back to 2001. Any idea what this means and how to fix it. I have searched google and Microsofts site with very little info available. TIA Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send a QuickGreet with MSN Messenger http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/cdp_games _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IMC Archive Folder
My quess is that someone may have deleted those files it is trying to archive. Are the files there? From: Sean Faust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: IMC Archive Folder Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 08:14:45 -0800 In the imcdata\in\ folder there is another subfolder called Archive and apparently there is a process that moves undeliverable mail I guess or something from the in and out folder to their respective archive folders. I am getting the following error message: 'Tue Nov 18 03:40:42 2003': MSExchangeIMC - The Internet Mail Service was unable to archive a message because MoveFile failed with error code 0x0020 while attempting to move C:_EXCHSRVR_imcdata_in_W6RLN7M1 to C:_EXCHSRVR_imcdata_in_Archive_W6RLN7M1. 'Tue Nov 18 03:40:42 2003': MSExchangeIMC - An error occurred while opening a temporary message file. Verify that the message spool directories are configured correctly and are readable by the Internet Mail Service. In Exchsrvr\imcdata\in there is the file that corresponds to the name in the above messages. The exchsrvr\imcdata\in\archive directory is full of files with dates going back to 2001. Any idea what this means and how to fix it. I have searched google and Microsofts site with very little info available. TIA Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 2003 OWA Operation
The browser is caching the logon credentials. Look on MS site there is an article for that. It depndeds on the version also. From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 2003 OWA Operation Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:03:59 -0500 I felt really comfortable with 5.5 OWA and now am testing 2003 OWA I dont see much nuts and bolts docs so if anyone knows where some are I am grateful . . . If I go to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange/mailbox-alias I am prompted for authentication. When entered I get a PAGE NOT FOUND error If I then back out to: http://kbc-mail1/exchange it dumps me into the mailbox I was previously trying to authenticate to without asking again. Any ideas? Default WWW/SMTP/NNTP/ASP .NET; no extra compoenets/config that werent done by a default Windows 2003 install . . . Thanks! Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Site connector question
Don't snip the thread. Well I suppose you could add a server at the remote site.. Make sure you have a GC there as well. But if you have enough bandwidth available you don't have too. It all depends on the users needs. Not enough info to make a solid decision. From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Site connector question Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 07:41:56 -0800 My answer is 200. I will have Outlook published in a Citrix farm at this remote location. 200 people will access outlook from that site. The Outlook application will be published on Terminal Servers (Citrix). From the servers Outlook will need to find an exchange server 1 of which is at my corporate office. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account is over limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Site connector question
How many users at the remote site? From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Site connector question Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 11:42:32 -0800 Currently I have a single Exchange Server 2K in my main office - I have an office opening remotely in 2 weeks - Do I add an exchange server into my organization at this remote site? Is it to speed access to the GAL or does it have a copy of the priv and pub databases. The connection to the main office is a T1 Thank You _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Virus Scanning Question MAPI/AVAPI
Why not just setup a relay server with Trend running on it. Four less machines to worry about. From: Sean Faust [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Virus Scanning Question MAPI/AVAPI Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:24:17 -0800 I have been using Trend for years but I am currently with an org that uses Norton for Exchange and they have been having problems for quite some time. There are 5 servers in one site all with SP4 on NT4 SP6. The question I need answered is does Trend support single instance scanning of messages destined for multiple recipients, or do they scan the message multiple times - (a) on the same server, (b) across multiple servers in the same site. The example would be if a message were coming in on a DL for mailboxes on multiple sites. From Q288848 for Outgoing Mail MS states: After you apply this fix, the information store releases the attachment and passes it to MTA to deliver outgoing mail. In some cases, the attachments are not scanned completely by the virus scan before they are released to the MTA. This may result in infected attachments being sent through outgoing mail. This is by design. The Exchange AV API version 1.0 guarantees virus cleanup for incoming mail but only commercially reasonable efforts for outgoing mail. Customers who apply this fix should make sure that they have the Antivirus product on all of the Messaging servers. While we are still using 5.5 is the reccomended practice to stick with MAPI mode? Has the outgoing mail not being scanned been fixed with Exchange 2000? Regards, Sean _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Crave some Miles Davis or Grateful Dead? Your old favorites are always playing on MSN Radio Plus. Trial month free! http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: smtp receives but stops sending
If your using Trend-Micro as your Virus scanner, on my last assignment they had a simular issue. It ended up on how Trend was setup. After tweaking settings the relay server never locked up again. Took almost a month to track down. From: Mark Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: smtp receives but stops sending Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 12:20:48 - We use UNIX boxes as our main email gateway/smarthost. Messages are routed to/from our back end exchange boxes to the unix boxes via an exchange 2003 front end server (which handles the anti-virus and anti-spam filtering). This configuration means that the unix boxes deal with all routing issues and are the only boxes exposed to the internet. Our back end servers can handle internal message traffic (although they do also scan messages for viruses) Ed, We will try running without the anti-virus scanning on the front end server, but with such an intermittant problem (may occur a couple of times a week and then not again for a couple of weeks) it is difficult to know how long a trail to give it. If this is an anti-virus issue then I would expect to get this problem with our backend servers which handle more smtp traffic (albeit only between themselves) and are running the same anti-virus config. -Original Message- From: Greg Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 10 November 2003 18:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: smtp receives but stops sending I am going to make a few assumptions based on the info contained in this thread thus far. 1)You have a MS SMTP server configured as a Smart Host for an Exchange 2003 server. In other words, you can install an instance of Exchange as a front end server, and I'm guessing you did not do this. 2)I'm also guessing that on said MS SMTP Smart Host you have relaying restricted to ONLY the domains you list. This alleviates MS confusion. 3)Anti-Spam operations are being conducted on this SMTP server via GFI software. 4)In the properties of your SMTP Smart Host, you have not enabled logging via the check box, AND included all extended properties. If a time threshold for delivery is not met, it will be logged here. Depending on your volume, place this file where there is ample storage. Also, be sure to check unlimited file size. Remedy- IMHO, there may be 2 ways to fix this. First, double check your hard coded DNS server on the smart host. I know that in native-mode AD, this should only have your DDNS server listed. Your DDNS server should be configured to make the DNS call if it doesn't have it in cache. I ran into this at the WS level. What happened was a latency with regards to delivery that lasted anywhere from 30 minutes to several days. Second, MS IIS SMTP is MICROSOFT! Build an EXACT duplicate box, configured exactly as the box you now have. Give it a test run between say 8-10 pm on a slow night. I'll bet that fixes it. Be sure ALL logging is enabled via the SMTP properties page, including extended properties. I'm guessing your build may be bad, or over time it has degraded. Hope that helps. gb -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: smtp receives but stops sending Only thing that comes to mind is a disk space issue. Will listen to see what the final outcome is. From: Mark Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smtp receives but stops sending Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:56:51 - Can anyone shed any light on the following behavior. We are running Exchange 2003 and during normal operation the smtp queues will be empty (apart from the occasionally message or 2 in transit). However, once or twice a week the smtp service on our front end server seems to stop delivering messages, but does continue to accept them, with the result that if left unchecked we get a backlog of thousands of messages in the 'Messages pending submission' queue. To resolve this we have to restart the smtp service, which is normally not possible. So we instead have to set the service to 'disabled' and then restart the entire server. The queue contents can then be moved out to a temporary location and the smtp service restarted. If we restart without clearing the original queue contents the IIS service often crashes, but if we start up with an empty queue we can feed the backlog back into the system a thousand at a time via the pickup folder and this will successfully deliver them. So this seems to imply that it is not the queue/message content that is causing the problem. We originally saw this problem with Exchange 2000, but successive service packs and now Ex2003 have not fixed the problem. It only seems
Re: smtp receives but stops sending
Only thing that comes to mind is a disk space issue. Will listen to see what the final outcome is. From: Mark Dewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: smtp receives but stops sending Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 16:56:51 - Can anyone shed any light on the following behavior. We are running Exchange 2003 and during normal operation the smtp queues will be empty (apart from the occasionally message or 2 in transit). However, once or twice a week the smtp service on our front end server seems to stop delivering messages, but does continue to accept them, with the result that if left unchecked we get a backlog of thousands of messages in the 'Messages pending submission' queue. To resolve this we have to restart the smtp service, which is normally not possible. So we instead have to set the service to 'disabled' and then restart the entire server. The queue contents can then be moved out to a temporary location and the smtp service restarted. If we restart without clearing the original queue contents the IIS service often crashes, but if we start up with an empty queue we can feed the backlog back into the system a thousand at a time via the pickup folder and this will successfully deliver them. So this seems to imply that it is not the queue/message content that is causing the problem. We originally saw this problem with Exchange 2000, but successive service packs and now Ex2003 have not fixed the problem. It only seems to happen at busy periods, like the Autumn term of a University. It ran without a hiccup over the summer break. We have a very fast network with several AD global catalogs available so I don't believe this to be an active directory related problem, but. We are also running GFI MailEssentials on this server, but only since June and the problem has been occuring on and off for the last couple of years. Sophos Mail Monitor Anti-Virus also runs on this and all our other Exchange servers, but only this one front end server has the problem. Is anyone having a similar problems? Any ideas how we can investigate this further (The events logs show no errors during the time period this occurs). --- Mark Dewell, University of East London, Dagenham, Essex, UK --- --- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]--- --- URL : http://homepages.uel.ac.uk/1278 --- Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty (Anne Herbert) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange
Sounds like a ASP setup you are trying to achieve almost. Check MS's site for info on doing that. From: Troels Majlandt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 22:15:45 -0800 Hmm, maybe there is somethíng that I have overlook here. Yes the Exchange should recive more than one domains, i.m.e. domain01.com and domain02.com (this I know should bee set up on the Exchange server) but the i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] are NOT the same user - they are two different persons. Also I did belive - maybe worng - that Exhcange is connected to AD so that a user must bee made in the AD - so the user can get a maibox etc. And therefore I need to have more than one domain in the same AD or ?? Have I overlook something here. Do you just want to answer move then one inbound FWDN domains?? If so you can do that with a recipients policy just add another SMTP address.. -- Rev. Kevinm WLKMMAS, Exchange MVP=20 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 10:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange More than one domain in the same AD / Exchange. Anyone know how this could bee done. I.E. First DC have AD - the second DC is Exchange. I would like to have more than one domain in the AD so i i.e. can make to user with the same name [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the Exchange they have ofcouse there own mailbox When I install a AD on a Windows 2000 DC i make the domain ie. domain01.com so far so good - and now i can make user like [EMAIL PROTECTED], but how do I add the second domain (domain02.com) to the AD to be able to make a username like [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=3Dexchangetext_mode=3D= lang=3Denglish To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Crave some Miles Davis or Grateful Dead? Your old favorites are always playing on MSN Radio Plus. Trial month free! http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: SMTP Addresses
Check the default reciepent policy or if more than one adjust the one for the specific users. Is this the Cleveland Height University Heights E2K server? From: Matt Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SMTP Addresses Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 12:52:04 -0500 This might be a silly newbie question, but how does one go about setting a default set of addresses in Exchange 2000 that will update all the user accounts with something other than just [EMAIL PROTECTED] For example, I already have it set so that all users have addresses at @heightslibrary.org and at @chuhpl.lib.oh.us. But the required addresses from our consortium also include needing the user name part of be the following formats: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] The second of these is easy... It's just the alias, but how can I set something up to format the addresses using the first and last names? Basically I'd like to avoid having to do it individually for all my users. I know the update service will take care of populating these accounts with the addresses, I just need to have the system recognize how I want the addresses formatted. Thanks, Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Crave some Miles Davis or Grateful Dead? Your old favorites are always playing on MSN Radio Plus. Trial month free! http://join.msn.com/?page=offers/premiumradio _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: last checked report
sort by last logon date. Which version of Exchange? From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: last checked report Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:59:14 -0500 Asked of me by one of my admins in in a school ... Is there any way to get a report of the last time someone has checked their email account? I know I could look in mailboxes in system manager ... but the mailboxes are organized administratively and not organizationally ... so, poking around for 40 mailboxes from over 4000 is not an option ... Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Maybe it's pointing to a different port From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:42:22 -0500 I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task. I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then is relayed to the appropriate back-end. So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail. I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound messages. How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange
Really. Hmmm Never worked with the stuff. Ask Symantec I guess. It's their stuff not really an Exchange issue is it then. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:47:44 -0500 I don't think it has any SMTP port settings. It just sits on the Exchange server and scans mail as it is leaves/enters the queue. Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 4:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange Maybe it's pointing to a different port From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Question about Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:42:22 -0500 I have spent all day trying to achieve what seems to be a simple task. I have Symantec Mail Security 4.0 for Exchange installed on a front-end Exchange 2000 server. Inbound mail first comes to this server and then is relayed to the appropriate back-end. So I have been trying to create a simple Inbound SMTP filter to match bad words in a message subject (quite simple stuff). For some reason Symantec Mail Security is simply ignoring inbound mail. I can tell it to scan outbound SMTP mail (a separate option) and create an outbound SMTP filter - no problem, it detects bad words in outbound messages. How can I tell it to start scanning inbound SMTP mail? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Compare high-speed Internet plans, starting at $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Great deals on high-speed Internet access as low as $26.95. https://broadband.msn.com (Prices may vary by service area.) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange on the road
On the POP3 client thereis an option to keep a copy on the server. I assume you are using Outlook Express but most others also have this option From: Steve Cobb [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange on the road Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 13:41:09 -0800 I have a customer that wants to be able to get their inter-office Exchange mails on the road. They want to do this from within Outlook. When I POP the Exchange server from outside the office, it starts to download ALL his messages, even those he has already read. Is there a way around this? If I let all the messages download, when he reconnects to the domain, will he get duplicates? Thanks, Steve Cobb _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Is your computer infected with a virus? Find out with a FREE computer virus scan from McAfee. Take the FreeScan now! http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Intra Organisation message routing between established E2k server and new E2K3 cluster
I think you may need to create a SMTP connector to the new E2K3 servers From: Alastair Morrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Intra Organisation message routing between established E2k server and new E2K3 cluster Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:38:57 - We have being running a single Exchange 2000 server, hosting its own mail domain, without problems for some time. It has been the only server in the organisation. MX records for the mail domain point only to this E2K server. It relays outbound smtp via a smarthost (UNIX). We recently installed a clustered Exchange 2003 server and 2 front end servers into the organisation. All servers are in the one, default Routing Group. The E2K server is the master. The E2K3 cluster plus 2 front end serves are members. The problem is that when a mailbox is moved from the E2K server to the E2K3 cluster, SMTP mail for that mailbox from outside the organisation is not delivered to the mailbox. What has happened is that the E2K server has created an SMTP queue for delivery to the E2K3 cluster but messages are being rejected. This is confirmed by the Event Log message - Event Id 4000 - The connection was dropped by the remote host On the E2K3 cluster I have explicitly allowed the E2K server to relay though the E2K3 SMTP virtual server but it made no difference. Forcing the relevant queue on the E2K server still fails to have the relevant messages accepted by the E2K3 cluster. The issue of message routing within an organisation in such an apparently simple scenario as ours does not appear to have merited much discussion in any of the obvious sources so I would imagine there is a simple fix that I have overlooked ? Thanks. Alastair Morrison IT Services Strathclyde University UK - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Strathclyde University Glasgow UK _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Public folder incomplete replication
Sounds like a permissions issue or possible DNS. Try putting the IP address in the X400 connectors and see if that works. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Public folder incomplete replication Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 14:31:31 -0800 Hi, MSX 5.5 on NT4 SP6a trying to replicate public folder with a server matching that same description across the Internet. Seperate sites connected using x400 (opened port x400 on both ends) and seperate NT4 domains. The folder had stopped updating previously, so we removed the replica from that server, let the changes filter through, then re-created the replica. The folder started to fill again, but shortly afterwards it stopped, short of size of the proper folder. Its been 24 hours now and the replication for the folder is set to always, but still no change in size (it did replicate more then previously). The folder is pathetically small (less then 1MB) so I cant imagine why its causing so much greif. The replication status of that folder on the server with the incomplete replica is showing as 'remote modified'. Any ideas on what causes this folder to replicate incompletely and how we might fix the problem. Regards, Luke _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ MSN Shopping upgraded for the holidays! Snappier product search... http://shopping.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 70-224 Exam
Don't be nervous From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange 70-224 Exam Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:39:22 -0500 Any advice before I take this exam? This is my first MCP test so I'm kind of nervous. Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Never get a busy signal because you are always connected with high-speed Internet access. Click here to comparison-shop providers. https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase?
On track's product is very much like Exmerge. Not sure you may want to check it out to see if it searches text. Big thing it allows you to seach DB's without them being online. From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 09:44:03 -0500 Did you look on Google for any third-party utilities that may be able to do the job? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: David, Andy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 7:26 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Doesn't help much after the fact though does it? -Original Message- From: Bourque Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? Build a specific signature that look for the string you are looking for in your external IDS and once it trigger, correlate the IDS log with your FW log to look at who was on-line (web e-mail) or what e-mail msg (SMTP) was sent at the same time... No need to look in everybody e-mail... -Message d'origine- De : Brian Dugas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 29 octobre, 2003 14:36 À : Exchange Discussions Objet : Can I search Exchange for a specific phrase? We have a user who we think maybe sending info to a competitor. Is there a way to search through all users emails for a specific phrase, namely the competitors name? We are running Exchange 5.5 sp4 Thanks in advance. Brian Ps. I am going to the archives now, but was hoping for a quick answer from someone knowledgeable on the list. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ See when your friends are online with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin
short answer is no. You could ask PSS if they have a routine to change but they will tell you that it is not recommended From: Kevin Dietz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Mailbox Size Limit Msg from Sys Admin Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 07:05:30 -0800 Is there a way to edit the system administrator message that is sent out to notify users that their mbx has passed a theshold limit. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 5.5 SP4 NT 4.0 UPGRADE TO EX2K Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:55:55 -0500 I have a box running nt 4.0 sp6 exchange 5.5 sp4. The store.exe every 2 days maxes out the cpu. I have to down the server and restart. Customer is interested in replacing box with ex2k and win2k. Can I upgrade this to this via migrate and will it get not only mail boxes and mail but the public folders they have which are extensive. I have never upgraded from 5.5 just set up nes ex2k boxes. Thanks for any help Matt _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Surf and talk on the phone at the same time with broadband Internet access. Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Question from client
can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
Ok then does he need another server/group or can it be done via his current setup with only one site/group that has mutiple servers already? I think he needs another group and server to set routing restrictions the address book put is pretty easy From: Bowles, John (OIG/OMP) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:27:01 -0500 yes we can do that... _ John Bowles Exchange Engineer OIG/HHS [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800 What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Question from client
Correct on the address list part. His big concern was the routing of internal only for mail between them and the internet mail not to go through the normal routing. I am going to talk to him to get exactly what he means by internet routing being separate from their normal routing for internet. I am also thinking he has to point those users mail to do the smarthost route. I will repost when I have all of what he want to accomplish. From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:21:49 -0800 You'd have to do it with different address lists. I don't have the number handy, but there are KB articles on making separate address lists. Through permissions you can control which ones users see. You would need a group to effectively assign the permissions. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Question from client E2K I was thinking that can be done but he would have to have another group created and also use a SMTP connector for the internet part From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Question from client Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 15:17:32 -0800 What version of Exchange? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 10:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Question from client can we setup a group of users in Exchange that are isolated to a outlook address book that they can only see. As well as restrict delivery only between their group and restrict inbound/outbound internet email? He currently has a single group. Exchnage 2000 I think he can but would have to setup another group and set restrictions via the RGC _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exch 5.5 Routing Question
I believe the Qwart file takes care of that in 5.5 which was elliminated in 2000. From: Woods, Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exch 5.5 Routing Question Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 12:08:19 -0800 Hello, Exchange 5.5 SP4 on W2K SP4 boxes. 1 ORG, 3 Sites (A, B, C) in three different cities across N.A. I have 2 x400 connectors setup in each location. Each site is setup the same in that they all have two x400 connectors, each going to one of the other sites. If the VPN link between Site A and Site C goes down and site C is trying to send mail to Site A, will Site C route it's mail through Site B to get to Site A? If not, how can I make this so? Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Want to check if your PC is virus-infected? Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Secure E-Mail
I am thinking that SSL and using a group policy applied to the users in question would be possible From: Miller, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 14:35:16 -0600 Yes, Encryption... I don't think we have a need for signatures Thanks -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Secure E-Mail What kind of security are you looking for? Encryption? Sincerely, Andrey Fyodorov Systems Engineer Messaging and Collaboration Spherion -Original Message- From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Secure E-Mail All, Just wondering what companies were using for Secure E-Mail. We are tasked with implementing a Secure E-Mail solution in FY '05. We have indeed done some research and investigation and have come up with 2 products so far that look promising (Tumbleweed and Certified mail). Has anyone had any experience or interaction with either, or recommend a different vendor/product). The goal is to provide our attorneys with the ability to send and receive secure email with their clients with 1. no user interaction or training 2. tracking capabilities 3. not email client specific 4. must be scanned by our SMTP gateways prior to leaving and entering our system TIA _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Enjoy MSN 8 patented spam control and more with MSN 8 Dial-up Internet Service. Try it FREE for one month! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Replicating Public Folders across x400 over Internet (MSX5.5/NT4)
Permissions, trusts and possible DNS issues From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Replicating Public Folders across x400 over Internet (MSX5.5/NT4) Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 20:56:40 -0800 Hi, we have 3 sites with 3 seperate exchange servers. These servers are in the same exchange organization, but each geographical location is a seperate NT4 domian (setup long ago). There is no VPN connection between the sites, etc.. so they really are stand alone networks with a mail gateway at the head office connected together by x400. In this setup, one exchange administrator can see all the servers and mailboxes and stuff, but you cant change anything that is not on the local server. We have tried replicating a public folder located on one of the remote sites to the head office site, but when we attempt to access the properties of that folder through exchange administrator in head office, exchange administrator produces an error 'the client operation failed - Microsoft Exchange Server Information store - error ID 8004010f-' Any ideas what the problem might be? Cheers Any ideas what the problem might be _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: How to send on behalf for an external Domain?
Setup Outlook with another an alternate profile is one way but not sure what your trying accomplish. Is this for people that have outside accounts or just want to use outside email addy's to send from? From: Michel Fayad [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: How to send on behalf for an external Domain? Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 14:16:02 +0300 Hi, We have Exchange 2000 configured to send and receive mail for our Domain (e.a. microsoft.com) A user in our company wants to be able to send email using a different Domain name (e.a. msn.com) Is there a way to configure Outlook/Exchange 2000 to give only this user permission to send on behalf this external email address? Hope anybody can help me with this issue. Best Regards, Michel Fayad _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: POP3 using SSL
If your going through a firewall make sure the appropriate port(995) for ssl pop3 or 993 for IMAP are open. No need for a certificate From: Chris Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: POP3 using SSL Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 13:14:58 -0700 Thanks for the quick response. That's the This server requires a secure connection (SSL). check box on the Advanced tab, right? Under POP3 server Access/Authorization, I have both clear and Int. Windows Auth. if that matters. Don't I need to download a certificate to the client? Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your current Internet access and enjoy patented spam control and more. Get two months FREE! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ntbackup scripts
Here is an old email response to a simular request that Ken Cornetet supplied some time ago. I guess you could change it to your needs. Enjoy! Use the GUI to create the backup selection file everything.bks. Obviously, you want this file to include your Exchange information stores. Change the BNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device to whatever the name of your tape drive is. See Q267574. This batch file needs grep, recode, and blat. Use your favorite search engine. rem * rem * rem * Perform fullback to whatever tape is in the drive and email rem * report rem * rem * Ken Cornetet - 06/10/2002 rem * rem * Revision History rem * rem * WhenWhoWhat rem * --- rem * 06/10/2002 Ken Cornetet Original Issue rem * 06/24/2002 Ken Cornetet Added RSM command per Q267574 rem * rem * set [EMAIL PROTECTED] set SMTP=ntserver1 set NAME=FULL BACKUP %DATE% %TIME% rem this is where NTBackup writes it's (unicode - blech) logs set LOGS=%USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Windows NT\NTBackup\data c: cd \backup rem Delete any extranious log files del %LOGS%\backup*.log rem rem * Have removable storage management look at tape in drive rem * (See Q267574 for details) rem start /wait rsm refresh /lfBNCHMARK DLT1 SCSI Sequential Device c:\bin\sleep 30 rem rem * Do Backup rem start /wait ntbackup backup @c:\backup\everything.bks /M normal /J %NAME% /P DLT /N %NAME% /l:s /HC:on /UM /D %NAME% rem rem * find newest (should be only) log file rem dir /s /b /o-d %LOGS%\backup*.log c:\backup\backup.tmp set /P FILE= c:\backup\backup.tmp rem rem * Make ASCII version of log file rem c:\bin\recode -f unicode..us %FILE% log.txt rem rem * Append list of open files to the report rem echo OPEN FILES log.txt net file log.txt rem rem * Set subject for email rem set SUBJ=Backup ran OK grep -v Error: You do not have permission log1.txt findstr /i error: log1.txt if not ERRORLEVEL 1 set SUBJ=Backup ran - FAILED rem rem * Send email rem c:\bin\blat log.txt -t %RECIPIENT% -subject %SUBJ% -server %SMTP% -f %RECIPIENT% rem rem * Move log file to our directory rem move /Y %FILE% c:\backup -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -=-=-=-=-= -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Candee Vaglica Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions As long as ntbackup is creating the log file, you can use blat to send it. -Original Message- From: Eric Holtzclaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ntbackup scripts Does anyone have a script/bat file that emails the Ntbackup log files on a daily bases? Eric _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Excluding specific email message types from backups
Don't know of any other than using Exmerge maybe. What I would do is make a separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not back them up during you normal runs. This will save space/time which sounds like what your trying to do From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Excluding specific email message types from backups Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:29:09 -0400 Background: Running Exchange 2000 with Cisco Unity's Unified Messaging. Management wants us to continue to use Cisco Unity to deliver voice messages left on our IP phones to our email. However, they do not want us to backup the voice messages. We are currently using Veritas Datacenter for backups. We have looked at the Veritas client, Leggato Exchange client, and the Microsoft Backup Utility. None of them allow you to exclude specific messages. They will allow you to exclude specific folders inside the mailbox but not the object or message level. Questions: Does anyone know of a backup client specific for Exchange 2000 that will allow you to exclude all .WAV files from backups? Is there anyone else that is not backing up voice messages within their message stores? Is there a way to do this with a script? How are others handling unified messaging in their environment? Any help or thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Information Technology [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 65 Hayden Ave Lexington, MA 02421 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups
Maybe a rule to put all wav files into a PST? Not sure if what you want to do is doable without heavy user intervention. Will sit back and see what others have to say. (Highest cost solution is to not back up the stores?) From: Steve Iadarola [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Excluding specific email message types from backups Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 11:52:35 -0400 Problem is that the entire company is using Cisco's Unified Messaging and IP phones. We are looking for the lowest cost solution. Obviously the zero cost solution is to disable the unified messaging. The highest cost solution is not to back up the stores at all. The moderately expensive option is to use the Exchange server that runs on the Unity server and just create everyone in the company a separate mailbox and configure outlook to open the second mailbox and not back up that store. The problem here is the cost for the additional mailboxes/virus scanning/unity lisences/ect... We would really like to stick with the exclude from backups if it is available. Steve Iadarola Senior Support Specialist Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What I would do is make a separate storage group for those mailboxes that contain wav files and not back them up during you normal runs. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Hep with PTR record
Yea was just going to ask which one is right? cerebus-service.aiim.org cerberus-service.aiim.org From: RBHATIA [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Hep with PTR record Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 12:25:24 -0400 Oops ! Never mind folks..figured it out. It was a typo in the DNS..thanks anyway -Original Message- From: RBHATIA [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Hep with PTR record Importance: High I am suddenly having problems with my incoming email and it seems to be a PTR record issue. My incoming email server was reporting the following error message in the App log : PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO string fw, accepting anyway Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org I verified the DNS settings for the TCP/IP protocol of my firewall that was sendign these emails to my mail server and found that the DNS hostname said FW while the domain was blank. I thus changed this to say Hostname: cerberus-service and domain: aiim.org I then rebooted the firewall However, my mail server still reports the same error. This time the error says: PTR record. 198.77.178.129 has a PTR record, but does not match HELO string cerebus-service.aiim.org, accepting anyway Ptrs = cerberus-service.aiim.org According to this message, the 2 PTR records do match then why am I still getting the error ? Please advise. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Concerned that messages may bounce because your Hotmail account has exceeded its 2MB storage limit? Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
DNS or possible Binding order From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:05:44 -0700 Hi There, I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all means feel free to post. We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are Running SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes (not on regular intervals, just randomly) the outlook clients we have all of a sudden cannot get their email and the 'finding exchange server' dialog pops up on outlook 2002. Even if you bail out of the client and try to go back in, you get the same windows and then a failure to login. So I check the Exchange server. It is running fine and everything is clam. No strange processes and even a network scan reveals nothing unusual. There are no event log entries either. I check the AD to make sure its ok and I can login via LDAP and Global Catalog ports without any issues. I can query users and use the MMc snapin for management of the AD. The server also has no strange processes running on it and its also calm. After finding nothing on a gut instinct I just restart the 'Netlogon' service and bang! everything returns to normal. What could be the issue? its happens randomly and sometimes it can go for day or weeks without happening. Thsi has happened now 2 times within a week and now has me and the executives worried about the stability of the system. Any help would be greately appreciated. -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American Greetings! Go to http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients?
Check the TCP binding order. Search MS for topics. Here is one. http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;163576 From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 14:32:14 -0700 Hi There, I checked DNS and all server IP's are correctly registered and I checked all the _msdcs directories and they are all registered correctly. Can you elaborate on what I should look for in binding order or dns? -Timothy DNS or possible Binding order From: Timothy Schilbach [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange Stops Responding to Clients? Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:05:44 -0700 Hi There, I have a wierd issue and if anyone has any possibly explanation by all means feel free to post. We have 4 AD serviers in our environment to date. All of the are Running SP3 on them and we have many Exchange 2000 servers as well. Sometimes (not on regular intervals, just randomly) the outlook clients we have all of a sudden cannot get their email and the 'finding exchange server' dialog pops up on outlook 2002. Even if you bail out of the client and try to go back in, you get the same windows and then a failure to login. So I check the Exchange server. It is running fine and everything is clam. No strange processes and even a network scan reveals nothing unusual. There are no event log entries either. I check the AD to make sure its ok and I can login via LDAP and Global Catalog ports without any issues. I can query users and use the MMc snapin for management of the AD. The server also has no strange processes running on it and its also calm. After finding nothing on a gut instinct I just restart the 'Netlogon' service and bang! everything returns to normal. What could be the issue? its happens randomly and sometimes it can go for day or weeks without happening. Thsi has happened now 2 times within a week and now has me and the executives worried about the stability of the system. Any help would be greately appreciated. -Timothy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American Greetings! Go to http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Want to check if your PC is virus-infected? Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Message comes to inbox and disappears again
Archive settings? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Uso Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 1:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions I am delivering to my mailbox and the mail is not delete by any rules. it keeps happening. Uso - Original Message - From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 5:16 PM Subject: RE: Message comes to inbox and disappears again Verify that you are delivering to your Exchange server mailbox and not a .pst. Samantha -Original Message- From: Uso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 6:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Message comes to inbox and disappears again Hi, twice today I receive a mail in my inbox and then it disappears again. The messages is coming from my own email address and the subject says: My-Exchange-Server-Name - 10-13-2003 10-13-24-894ms any idea what that is? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bulk set of primary smtp address
Which version of Exchange? From: Uso [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Bulk set of primary smtp address Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:24:37 +0400 Hi, we have been using two SMTP addresses for each user with two different domain names. I would like to set the primary address of all users to one of these domain names. Is there an easy way to do that? regards Uso _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get McAfee virus scanning and cleaning of incoming attachments. Get Hotmail Extra Storage! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
You can not go directly to E2K3 from Exchange 5.5. IIRC From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:54:18 -0400 I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO, I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc.. Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003 (so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move Mailbox method. If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone know if there are any gotcha's moving mailboxes from the Exchange 5.5 server to the Exchange 2000 server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003
Ah I see said the blind man. From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 11:02:23 -0400 Sure you can, just not in-place. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 You can not go directly to E2K3 from Exchange 5.5. IIRC From: Andy David [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 10:54:18 -0400 I don't think you will be able to find a definitive answer to this, but IMO, I wouldn't use the 2003 ADC to migrate 5.5 to E2k. There seems to be a lot going on here: W2003 domain, E2k and E2003 servers, migration from 5.5 etc.. Why not just migrate directly to E2003 when you feel comfortable with it after testing in the lab, and forget the E2k bit entirely? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Dubyn Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2003 7:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Using Exchange 2003 ADC for both Exchange 2000 and 2003 Just upgraded a domain from Windows NT to Windows 2003. Our next phase will migrate Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 with some users going to Exchange 2003 (so it can be proven as a viable endpoint for the migration) using the Move Mailbox method. If I use the ADC for Exchange 2003, does anyone know if there are any gotcha's moving mailboxes from the Exchange 5.5 server to the Exchange 2000 server? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Use custom emotions -- try MSN Messenger 6.0! http://www.msnmessenger-download.com/tracking/reach_emoticon _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIS ?
If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to other users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST efectively removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the forwarded email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the attachment. _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SIS ?
That's what I thought. Thanks for verifying for me. Because other messages refer to an object it never gets truly deleted from the DB. From: Bridges, Samantha [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: SIS ? Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 08:49:40 -0400 The .pst file would get a copy of the attachment from Exchange. The rest of the users who received a forwarded copy will still reference the single instance storage for the attachment on the Exchange server. Exchange will still retain a copy (SIS) for the other users who remain on the Exchange server. Hope this helps. Samantha -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SIS ? If a user has a message with an attachment on it that he forwards to other users, he then moves the message that has the attachment to a PST efectively removing it from the Exchange DB. Do all of the recipients of the forwarded email have an instance or does Exchange somehow keep a copy of the attachment. _ Need more e-mail storage? Get 10MB with Hotmail Extra Storage. http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Get a FREE computer virus scan online from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: connecting 2 different org. via x400 to route emials
Yes it can be done. Search MS's site for examples of how to do. First find out what they have. From: stooge [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: connecting 2 different org. via x400 to route emials Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:45:57 -0700 I have a project to do as follows. MY companies name is ABC and was just purchased by a totally separate company called 123. We have been asked to connect our email systems to each other. Our company is in NY and runs a Exchange 5.5 and the other company is in FL and runs Exchange 5.5 or Win2k Exchange (not sure yet). What they want to accomplish is When a user from company ABC sends an email to a user at company 123 it gets routed via x400 instead of going out through the IMC(internet). Remeber that both these companys are totally seperate from each other meaning Different Organizations within Exchange. The question is can this be accomplished? I believe that only way this can be accomplished is by having Exchange servers in the Same Organization and/or other sites Within the same organization. Remember that my company ABC has an Exchange 5.5 server and other company called 123 has either Exchange 5.5 or windows 2000 exchange. I believe its windows 2000 exchange. Feedback welcomed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Compare Cable, DSL or Satellite plans: As low as $29.95. https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: winmail.dat
IMS settings or the external clients may have Netscape as their browser and using the POP3 email portion. At least something that I ran into once. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miller, Robert Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions All, We are in the process of moving from Exchange 5.5 to Exchange 2000 (SP3, May Post SP3 rollup). We have 3 Regional Hubs to which all outbound SMTP traffic is routed through from downstream offices. My Team is getting numerous complaints of external clients receiving the winmail.dat files instead of the original attachments (hotmail, aol, etc...). This only happens to our senders that are from a downstream office. If we send from one of the Hub locations it works perfect every time. I think then we have narrowed it down to the X400 connector, as that is the only difference between sending from a downstream office and a Hub. We have the settings on Exchange 2000 connectors the same as they were with the 5.5 X400 connectors. Has anyone else experienced this? TIA, BM _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ??? on outlook folders
Sounds like a language pack issue. Does he travel quite a bit? From: Watkins V [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ??? on outlook folders Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:41:47 +0100 Dear all, I have one user only who when he opens his mailbox in outlook 98 sees most of his mail folders as ???I cannot see why. Nothing on technet etc. Exchange 5.5 latest sp, nt 4.0 sp6a etc. Thanks Vanessa Watkins Network Manager Royal Holloway, University of London Tel: 01784 443728 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message during games with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Repairing individual mailboxes
If Arcserve is the main thing that your having trouble with, why not use NTBackup. Or does your version of Arcserve lockout sharing of tape backup devices? From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:10:57 -0700 That blows. On the upside, a recovery server can be a simple PC as long as it has enough disk space. -Original Message- From: Neil Doody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Hmm, well the luckily, but maybe in the long run not so luckily, the policy currently employed here is most people have PST's. Now don't taunt me on that, I have submitted multiple justification proposals to have more hard disks, veritas with SIS, everyone on mailboxes with 7 day rollback enabled and Outlook 2003 with cache folders, especially for the 64k sites. Currently the policy is we have arcserve with Brick Level Backup and most people keep there data in PST files. I have used this problem that occurred at the weekend once again to push for Veritas at the very least. Again I re-itterate, this is not by my choice, I am seeing to get it all changed. Anyway, I don't know what caused the corruption, I blaimed it on Arcserve ;p When I got in late, my car wouldn't start I was late (coincidence!), others had already began work to fix the databases that wouldn't come online, they deleted the e00.log file for some strange reason (even out of the recycle bin :o) I then came in and did my best to get the server back online, I have managed to with minimal loss of data. Unfortunately, I'm the best they have here, and I'm not brilliant myself, but I am making do best with the resources available to me (anyone got any spare HDD's? ;p) Anyway, you didn't even ask me none of that, but thought id put everyone in the picture! But as for the recovery server idea, I guess it would be a good idea for me to get a spare server to use as test recovery huh? But anyway the tape backup jobs only run on weekdays, the server messed up sometime at the weekend, so it is only the weekends emails that are lost, but they obviously weren't backed up! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2003 18:54 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Repairing individual mailboxes Have you tried restoring to a recovery server with another backup to see if you can grab the mailboxes that way? What caused the initial corruption? - Original Message - From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:42 PM Subject: Repairing individual mailboxes I had some database corruption over the weekend, ive recovered from this and the system is working relatively okay. Some mailboxes however seem to have gotten corrupted. If I send a mail to a user with a corrupt mailbox, they go into outlook and there Inbox is empty. I look in the system manager and the email is stuck in the Queue, if I look at the mailboxes view within system manager it shows there are items in the users mailbox. I tried using ExMerge and it runs but extracts no emails. If I delete the users mailbox and recreate it, they work fine, so there is defiantly a problem with there mailbox on the server. Are there any repair tools that can just attempt to repair and get any data from an individual mailbox from with an Exchange Database? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download
RE: Repairing individual mailboxes
I too once had a difficult Is that could restore from any decent backup. Took 3 tries using isinteg until the database ran clean with no errors. All I can suggest is to use the fastest machine you have to run it on. From: Neil Doody [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 19:40:10 +0100 Ai, ill do that now, but I did do it last night, I ran it, did some things, then just before the defrag ran it once more and there was no errors! Then I continued to do the defrag after. Maybe I should have run it once more after the defrag huh? Ill know for next time ;p -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 September 2003 19:38 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Repairing individual mailboxes Keep running it until it finds nothing. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy patented spam protection and more. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: strange problems
Does the DC that goes down also a Global? From: Fyodorov, Andrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: strange problems Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:37:53 -0400 Hi all. We are having some interesting problems with one of our Exchange 2000 SP3 cluster. I wonder is anyone here has seen something like this. It seems that whenever a DC *in another AD site* goes offline, this particular Exchange server starts acting up: users can't connect to the server with Outlook, ESM reports that the stores are dismounted, refreshing the storage group view produces an error that Information Store service may not be running, intermittently the stores seem to mount again, then again appear dismounted. Why would Exchange start acting up like this if one of many DCs goes offline, especially if this DC is in another AD site? We end up failing over the cluster to another node and the server is happy again, until next time. Also another (but I believe related) issue - today a DC in the same AD site went offline and caused all users whose mailboxes are homed on this cluster to receive Error 500 Internal Server Error in OWA. We had to change the server properties under the DS Access tab to manually list good DCs instead of letting Exchange discover DCs automatically, then failed over the cluster - OWA started working fine again. The other two Exchange 2000 SP3 clusters did not get affected by this at all. To the best of my knowledge all these clusters are built the same. They sit in the same rack. They are on the same VLAN. They use the same hardware. They are up to the same SP and patch levels. Any ideas? Thanks in advance! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with NDR
I would contact the sending email administrator and ask him if sees anything on his end. From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with NDR Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:13:16 -0500 OL2K is being used for all msgs - fail or not. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with NDR What type of client is being used for the just the ones that fail to you. From: Sean Winters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Help with NDR Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:43:43 -0500 Nothing in my event log. The NDR is being generated on the sending end - not on my server. It also appears that not all messages are NDRing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Help with NDR It might be something on the other end. 4.4.1 usally indicates a network issue. Does it happen for all email sent to those two domains. How was it sent. Anything in the Event logs? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Winters Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions I am working with a relatively new Ex2K build and have had two different external contacts report intermittent NDR's. There is no PIX firewall in place and ESMTP verbs have been disabled on our end. The NDR is 4.4.1 Did not receive the expected protocol response. Searching the usual sources has turned up nothing. Any ideas/suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Logic Validation
You can have mutiple site connectors attaching to other sites. Only one is needed for mail flow. From: Chris H [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Logic Validation Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:23:41 -0400 Can someone double-check me? If I have another server in my ORG but in a different SITE, I should only have to create a SITE connector between it and ONE server in my site (a bridgehead) and NOT every server in my site for users to exchange mail . . .correct? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Instant message in style with MSN Messenger 6.0. Download it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - NLB
You could do it if you use Cisco and or Alteon Load balancing switches to do Harware balanacing but costs may be the same as upgrading to enterprise version of Exchange. Soemthing to consider. From: Bolser, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:07:08 -0400 Only supported on Win2k advanced server: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/windows2000serv/Default.asp It's listed under Increased Scalability -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - NLB Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA - NLB
You would have to contact the vendor and explain what your trying to accomplish and get the latest info. Hardware -vs- Network load balancing both have their place. From: Mellott, Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:24:45 -0400 Thanks..actually I am about to replace my main switches... Might you have an Idea which cisco units could do this PS to All...Actually you can add NLB to W2K stantard..BUT you must purchase Application Center 2000..which has NLB as one of it's components..and well then you have to purchase sometype of license cause you are now auth to 1 but hitting many. the cost of all this work out to be cheaper to purchase Adv Svr... thanks bill -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA - NLB You could do it if you use Cisco and or Alteon Load balancing switches to do Harware balanacing but costs may be the same as upgrading to enterprise version of Exchange. Soemthing to consider. From: Bolser, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OWA - NLB Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:07:08 -0400 Only supported on Win2k advanced server: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/prodtechn ol/windows2000serv/Default.asp It's listed under Increased Scalability -Original Message- From: Mellott, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA - NLB Ive got my OWA-55 on a W2k svr...Id like to bring up second and do NLB between the two svr's... But from what Ive found so far I can only do NLB with W2K Adv svr...Is there a way to load NLB to W2K svr standard? thanks bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month (depending on the local service providers in your area). https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ADC Connector issue
I thought I read where you must run Forest and Domain prep prior to installing ADC. From: Milt Atkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: ADC Connector issue Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:57:08 -0500 We have installed AD on a W2k3 box and have it running in the mixed mode. We are now trying to install E2k3 and the ADC wizard gets to step 3 and advises that ir needs to modify the attributes of the mailboxes that we have IMS and directory replication with, but are in other Exchange sites and we do not have admin or service account rights to. We have an IMS connection and exchange directory information only to these other sites and we can not proceed with E2k3 until the wizard is satisfied. Has anyone run into this before? Is there a work around to tell the wizard that it only needs to modify the necessary attributes in our site and not those with an IMS connection? _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy patented spam protection and more. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Add MSN 8 Internet Software to your existing Internet access and enjoy patented spam protection and more. Sign up now! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/byoa _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Help with NDR
It might be something on the other end. 4.4.1 usally indicates a network issue. Does it happen for all email sent to those two domains. How was it sent. Anything in the Event logs? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean Winters Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions I am working with a relatively new Ex2K build and have had two different external contacts report intermittent NDR's. There is no PIX firewall in place and ESMTP verbs have been disabled on our end. The NDR is 4.4.1 Did not receive the expected protocol response. Searching the usual sources has turned up nothing. Any ideas/suggestions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
