RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good. Questions: What operating system are you running it on? Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own? If it needs another, what do you suggest? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially tested it on) uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange is on or another one ... we run it as a service ... our path looks something like this Xwall --- Exchange (Front end servers) (separate servers) If you want more detailed info, feel free to contact me directly ... Mike -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good. Questions: What operating system are you running it on? Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own? If it needs another, what do you suggest? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Thanks for the info. I'm loading up a server right now to test. Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially tested it on) uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange is on or another one ... we run it as a service ... our path looks something like this Xwall --- Exchange (Front end servers) (separate servers) If you want more detailed info, feel free to contact me directly ... Mike -Original Message- From: Robert Blomquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good. Questions: What operating system are you running it on? Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its own? If it needs another, what do you suggest? Thanks, Robert Blomquist Supervisor of Information Technology Sabic Americas, Inc. -Original Message- From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
We have used Xwall for about a year. It is very good. It is one guy I think. He is very responsive. It seems like when you ask if something can be done, it gets put in the next release ... I think he is Austrian , so be a little careful with his choice of good/bad english words ... We use Bayesian filtering on it. I would suggest that you first get your other filters in place and are happy with them before you start collecting stats to start your bayesian filtering. Then, once it is working, review the emails and the stats (in .csv files) and set your level a touch higher than what you think it should be ... You can also edit the NDR's ... Does virus scanning ... Etc, etc, etc, you name it ... I also took the .csv's and the collected the blocked messages and made an .asp site for my users, so that they could log in through a web page and unblock email addresses (it also does unique whitelists for individual users ...) For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ... mike -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
It does work, we've used it for a year or so. I've not used the bayes filtering but the rest is very flexible, also it's written by a small company (I suspect it's one guy) and I've found him really quick with replies to questions, and very amenable to adding sensible features to later versions. The one thing I do like about it is the logging - we use 5.5 and smtp logging sucks, this logs everything to text, and the important info to csv and all sort of stuff.. well worth a try IMHO. regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 30 October 2003 14:53 To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it works that sound very reasonable. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
You are going to be introducing a lot of changes by doing this. Let me give you a piece of advise. Put the Xwall on a separate box. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110. Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. -K- -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
But POP users send using SMTP. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adams, Kevin C. Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110. Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong. -K- -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering. Exchange 5.5 Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send. This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall will use port 25 and get the messages first. I guess my questions are: For users using POP or custom applications that are using the Exchange IMC as their relay host, how will changing the ports affect them? Have I just disabled POP by installing XWall? We have locked down all unused ports so I guess I need to open port 24 up to the front end and back end servers as well. Is there anything I need to be careful about or any other gotchas that I should know. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic
As far as DNS is concerned, yes. As far as AD is concerned, no. You'd need to create a trust. Jason -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic Hi Guys, Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain under a master NT4 domain? thanks Raj ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic
Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off topic Subject: Off topic Hi Guys, Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain under a master NT4 domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic
Thanks, that's what I thought. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic Not exactly. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off topic Subject: Off topic Hi Guys, Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain under a master NT4 domain? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Chris Scharff wrote: Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two products, one is Anti-Spam Gateway and the other is Matador. So by saying that you didn't say Matador, I assume you are saying you did say Anti-Spam Gateway. Sorry, I forgot my invisible subtext glasses yesterday, it's much clearer now. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. I said Mailfrontier not Matador. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sarcastic sod G, incidentally, were
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Why yes. Yes he did. -Original Message- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Chris Scharff wrote: Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two products, one is Anti-Spam Gateway and the other is Matador. So by saying that you didn't say Matador, I assume you are saying you did say Anti-Spam Gateway. Sorry, I forgot my invisible subtext glasses yesterday, it's much clearer now. rest of thread snipped _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I said Mailfrontier not Matador. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two products, one is Anti-Spam Gateway and the other is Matador. So by saying that you didn't say Matador, I assume you are saying you did say Anti-Spam Gateway. Sorry, I forgot my invisible subtext glasses yesterday, it's much clearer now. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. I said Mailfrontier not Matador. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from subscribers to lists I post to. Not. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM Posted To: swynk Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution. Its even cheap! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
What do you mean, can everyone actually do that? Osirusoft is the one that added the * to their DNSBL, so anyone who subscribes to them will now block all mail. Best you can do is contact the admin of the place your mail is getting rejected at, and let them know. Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:44 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through -Original Message- From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended to stop using relays.osirusoft.com Ben Winzenz Network Engineer Gardner White (317) 581-1580 ext 418 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM Posted To: Exchange (Swynk) Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world. No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's, but I thought the article was interesting. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/27/0214238mode=threadtid=111; tid= 126 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves
It was from Microsoft KB. I'm not finding the article right now, but that's how I figured out what the problem was. I'll continue searching if you want. -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lynne July Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Chris, How were you able to determine that the drive mapping was causing the problem? We have a similar problem here, and can't find anything in the event logs that pinpoints the problem. It would be easy enough to test by disconnecting drive mappings, but I'd be happier if there was something definitive to verify that the drive mapping is causing the lock out. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves This happened to us here. We found out that their drive mapping were still trying to authenticate with the old passwords. So we disconnected them and then recreated the drive mappings. Problem solved -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson, Steven Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Andrey, I ran into this same issue shortly after we upgraded our domain to Win2k AD last summer. Funny thing was, all the lockouts were coming from Windows 98 workstations. I could never put my finger on it, and in desperation finally disabled account lockouts. However, invalid password attempts were still being logged in the event view. Shortly after moving the domain over to native mode, the problem all but disappeared. Now that the majority of our desktops are running Win2k, I'll probably re-enable the account lockout policy and monitor the event logs. Strangest thing, and to this day my must frustrating mystery. Steven --- Steven Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Network Administrator The Key School, Annapolis Maryland -Original Message- From: Fyodorov, Andrey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Windows accounts are getting locked out by themselves Hello everyone. In our Windows 2000 Active Directory, we implemented a lockout policy that would lock someone's account after 5 unsuccessful logon attempts. Now we are having a rash of incidents where people's accounts get locked out just like that. The users do not make any unsuccessful logon attempts, they just login normally and then the account is locked. I checked and these users are not running any services or scheduled jobs under their accounts either. What could this be? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
Let me clarify a little. We have sender notification off. We have recipient on. All recipients received the message notification and not just the users on Exchange. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender. This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587. When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it? Man that doesn't sound right to me. I spoke to Trend and they said that is how it works and it always worked that way. I recently customized the recipient notification message to contact our help desk but I didn't think that external users would get it. Anyone else run into this issue? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory Does anyone know an AD mailing list as good as this one is for Exchange? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
W2k server or active directory? -Original Message- From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List? Thanks Dirk du Plooy Analyst Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07 Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445 Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify Dirk du Plooy at Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd immediately, telephone number +27 (0) 11 266 5445. Any unauthorised use, alteration or dissemination is prohibited. Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss whether it be direct, indirect or consequential, arising from information made available and actions resulting there from. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
msnews.microsoft.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List? Thanks Dirk du Plooy Analyst Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07 Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445 Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify Dirk du Plooy at Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd immediately, telephone number +27 (0) 11 266 5445. Any unauthorised use, alteration or dissemination is prohibited. Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss whether it be direct, indirect or consequential, arising from information made available and actions resulting there from. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
WINNT-L http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html -Kevin -Original Message- From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:24 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List? Thanks Dirk du Plooy Analyst Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07 Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445 Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify Dirk du Plooy at Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd immediately, telephone number +27 (0) 11 266 5445. Any unauthorised use, alteration or dissemination is prohibited. Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss whether it be direct, indirect or consequential, arising from information made available and actions resulting there from. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA David Clark Company Inc. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List? WINNT-L http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html -Kevin -Original Message- From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:24 AM Posted To: Exchange Conversation: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List? Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List? Thanks Dirk du Plooy Analyst Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07 Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445 Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE: This message and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee. If you have received this message in error, please notify Dirk du Plooy at Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd immediately, telephone number +27 (0) 11 266 5445. Any unauthorised use, alteration or dissemination is prohibited. Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd Ltd accepts no liability whatsoever for any loss whether it be direct, indirect or consequential, arising from information made available and actions resulting there from. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
We're using current backups performed on 2000 SP3. Both systems running the same which has really got me puzzled why it will not read on the recovery box. -Original Message- From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 5:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore. After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and I don't know if it's related, but I remember some issue with Exchange 2000 Service Pack 3 changing ntbackup and earlier backups will no longer be recognized. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
I may be the DLT driver. - Original Message - From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:06 PM Subject: Off topic DLT 7000 restore. Somewhat off topic. We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000. After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and they are the same. Rebuilt the system twice now no luck. I'm using an Adaptec driver and I lowered the speed to 20 and that didn't do it. I verified both systems are at the same service pack. My test box is pretty old, but it worked with NT. I took the tapes back over to the production box, and it see's them fine. If I take some older tapes and put them in, the DLT 7000 at least recognizes that there is old tape and allows me to format them. Any ideas would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
You may be the driver?? Well, you must be very busy, making sure all the DLT's run correctly! :-) Alex Tony Hlabse wrote: | I may be the DLT driver. | | - Original Message - | From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:06 PM | Subject: Off topic DLT 7000 restore. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
OK OK. Well it seems many problems with DLT tape drives not working correctly are the drivers. - Original Message - From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:41 PM Subject: Re: Off topic DLT 7000 restore. You may be the driver?? Well, you must be very busy, making sure all the DLT's run correctly! :-) Alex Tony Hlabse wrote: | I may be the DLT driver. | | - Original Message - | From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:06 PM | Subject: Off topic DLT 7000 restore. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and I don't know if it's related, but I remember some issue with Exchange 2000 Service Pack 3 changing ntbackup and earlier backups will no longer be recognized. -Kevin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
hehe - Not to mention the probability that there arent any storage limits on that folder! -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Off Topic Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate access. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
Mongo let replies out to Internet. -Original Message- From: Cohen, Bret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments Bret Cohen Viacom Information Services and Technology mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
-Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 June 2002 00:48 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. I think we're back to closing our eyes and wishing really hard again. -- Robert Moir, MSMVP Senior IT Systems Engineer, Luton Sixth Form College Dogs have owners, Cats have staff -- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
copied and pasted Create a distribution list (using Exchange Adminstrator) and a public folder (using Outlook) In Exchange Administrator set the email address for the public folder to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Add the public folder as a member of the distribution list. (In Exchange Administrator, scroll to the public folder, then go to file properties distribution lists add then add the distribution list) Go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook. Give the folder default permissions contributor (Exchange 2000 set anonymous to contributor) Go to the public folder in outlook, right click on the folder and click on properties. Click the administration tab and then click on the folder assistant. Click Add rule. In the to: field, select the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with template and type in the reply text and subject save and close. click ok twice. Be sure to note in the body of the reply: This is an autoresponse. Please do not respond to this message. click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all incoming messages... (make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.) Publish the email address of the distribution list. -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off-Topic Question
What you can do, however, is enable automatic replies / forwards / oof etc. to a particular domain. Auto Replies to the world are a bad idea in general, but particularly if you are concerned about SPAM. Just think of an auto-reply as an auto-confirm to the next piece of spam you receive. Spin it that way and most users will agree that they can do without them. That said, you can often make a business case for enabling automatic replies / OOF to trusted domains such as vendors, suppliers, major customers, etc. You would do this under Global Settings | Internet message formats -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off-Topic Question It's all or none. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off-Topic Question Under Exchange 2000 is there a way to turn on auto-replies to the internet for a single user? Running in mixed mode with Ex5.5 at this time. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
www.cdolive.com -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic
Check http://www.cdolive.com/code.htm -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange 2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- - Original Message - From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic
Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate access. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Off Topic Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate access. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic But that will likely end up in constant mail loop chases. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gary Aiston Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic In-Box rule? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald B. Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic
Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments Bret Cohen Viacom Information Services and Technology mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive resumes from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only works when a user sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the attendent off and then on. Is there a better why to handle this? and How? Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Question
From TechNet disable Task Manager search - To disable the TASK MANAGER button, create the following value in the registry: NOTE: The System key may need to be created. HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion \Policies\System\ DisableTaskMgr = 1 (DWORD Hexadecimal value) Or you can use Group Policy, apparently. HTH Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Charles Carerros [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 12:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic Question I was told that there might be a way to keep the CTRL-ALT-DEL and/or task manager from canceling an .exe or .bat file. Does anyone know where I can find a way to do this with Windows 2000 server/workstation and Windows XP. Thanks, Chuck _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Off Topic Question
Fortres 101 Version 4.1 http://www.fortres.com/ Mike --- Charles Carerros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was told that there might be a way to keep the CTRL-ALT-DEL and/or task manager from canceling an .exe or .bat file. Does anyone know where I can find a way to do this with Windows 2000 server/workstation and Windows XP. Thanks, Chuck _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc.
In their login scripts add lines like: del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file1 del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file2 -Original Message- From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc. To resolve a problem with user's inability to download server-side Outlook Forms, I have to delete two files from the profile folders of every profile on every Windows 2000 Pro client currently deployed. This path is static with the exception of the user's name: c:\documents and settings\user name\local settings\ Does anyone have any ideas of how to automate this task so Help Desk want have to deploy SneakerNet to correct the problem? We have SMS deployed. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc.
If you wanted to do it all at once rather than wait for users to log in, you could write an adsi script that would loop through every machine name found in the AD (or SAM), and then use fso to loop through every folder name found under documents and settings. Something like: sub main set wsh=createobject(wscript.shell) set fso = CreateObject(Scripting.FileSystemObject) Set adsDomain = GetObject(WinNT://MyDomain) For Each adsComp In adsDomain if adsComp.class=Computer then Set fsoFolder=fso.GetFolder(\\ adsComp.Name \Documents and Settings for each fsoUserFolder in fsoFolder.SubFolders fso.deletefile(fsoUserFolder.Path \local settings\file1 next end if next end sub The above is real bare-bones and probably won't work without tweaking. I would strongly recommend error trapping, or else you'll error out at the first machine that's disconnected. You should also create a log file that lists describes each action completed and whether or not an error was recorded--makes it easier to determine which machines weren't touched. -Original Message- From: Ken Cornetet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc. In their login scripts add lines like: del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file1 del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file2 -Original Message- From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc. To resolve a problem with user's inability to download server-side Outlook Forms, I have to delete two files from the profile folders of every profile on every Windows 2000 Pro client currently deployed. This path is static with the exception of the user's name: c:\documents and settings\user name\local settings\ Does anyone have any ideas of how to automate this task so Help Desk want have to deploy SneakerNet to correct the problem? We have SMS deployed. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc.
Have you looked at www.myITforum.com? This is Rod Trent's web site for all things SMS. Rod is to SMS, what Daniel, Missy, The Ed's, The Andy's, et al, are to Exchange. Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 11:18 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc. To resolve a problem with user's inability to download server-side Outlook Forms, I have to delete two files from the profile folders of every profile on every Windows 2000 Pro client currently deployed. This path is static with the exception of the user's name: c:\documents and settings\user name\local settings\ Does anyone have any ideas of how to automate this task so Help Desk want have to deploy SneakerNet to correct the problem? We have SMS deployed. Thanks in advance. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic-- Open Network Ports (161 162)
Speak to your firewall administrator? -Original Message- From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic-- Open Network Ports (161 162) Hi, I need to open and allow ports 161 162 for our UPS communications What is the best way to do it? Adriaan Van Huissteden Network Administrator Connect Credit Union Phone: (03) 6233 0660 Disclaimer: ridiculous waste of bandwidth deleted _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Explanation: RPC is cool. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, Bill _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Sitting on the steps of capital hill? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma g01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Y'all are brutal. Get me out of here... -Original Message- From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Oh, let's hope not. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Sitting on the steps of capital hill? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma g01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
http://www.lilbill.net/index.html William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Not that bill, this bill: http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill.htm l Amateur. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption http://www.lilbill.net/index.html William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Thats the one I was thinking about.. Thanks Jennifer.. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond He's a Dentist, a Detective, a MindReader, No He is in IT. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 5:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Not that bill, this bill: http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill .htm l Amateur. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption http://www.lilbill.net/index.html William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma g01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic - Encryption
I have that one on Laserdisc. One of the best. Tom. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Not that bill, this bill: http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill .htm l Amateur. -Original Message- From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption http://www.lilbill.net/index.html William -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill... -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, Thank you. -Original Message- From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption Bill, http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kma g01/ html/NT4_0Encryption.asp (link may wrap) makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with RPC. -- be - MOS I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or not, and then I think we went home. I guess some things never leave you. -Original Message- From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic - Encryption I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook. We are using Exchange 5.5. Any documentation I've seen talks about the need to configure with secure RPC if encryption is desired between the client and server. Here is what puzzles us. We have not selected any form of encryption. However, when we read email from the inbox we notice that there is no human readable text within the packets on the LAN. Can someone please explain. Thank you, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was Connector for Lotus Note s)
Have you re-applied sp4?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was Connector for Lotus Notes)
Dear All,
Sorry to bother you again with this Connector for Lotus Notes connecter
thing (@#%* :-(. Still no e-mail flow from Exchange to Notes. Number of
messages stuck in the Outbound to Notes queue: 3408 (and counting).
When I try to start the Convert Exchange to Notes process (Exchange
Connectivity Administrator, Start One Process option), it stops after a
few seconds (Every other process is running and Idle). The Log Browser
displays 4 yellow (level 2; warning) messages:
LME-NOTES-MEXNTS 41409 The NOTES Server the NMC is connected to is Notes
Build Version: 147
LME-NOTES-MEXNTS 41410 The local Notes platform the NMC is running on is
Notes Build Version: 147
LME-NOTES-MEXNTS 54101 Error {Unrecognised transform} Exchange to Notes
Attachment XFM failed.
LME-NOTES-MEXNTS 54101 An ABNORMAL SHUTDOWN request has been received.
Now TechNet tells me in Q197870 of message number 54006: Error {GRC:2828}
Notes to Exchange Attachment XFM failed
Their solution is the good old please install the latest service pack
one. In Q197870 their talking about SP3. This Exchange box is running on
SP4, both lsntsmex.exe and lsntshc.dll version being 5.5.1960.8.
Anyone out there who knows what's going on?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Olivier
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was Connector for Lotus Note s)
No, I didn't. Do I have to re-install SP$? Regards, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was Connector for Lotus Note s)
Thats one of the steps i would take in trying to find a resolution. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 January 2002 15:16 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was Connector for Lotus Note s) No, I didn't. Do I have to re-install SP$? Regards, Olivier _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF TOPIC (Slightly) - Surfcontrol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I have no experience with Surfcontrol's E-mail filter, but I can tell that there Superscout webfilter product has some serious issues.. It can be bypassed with easily.. This bug was brought to their attention, released to the Bugtraq comunity and still never fixed.. If their E-mail filter is at all similar in quality, I would stear clear.. ~John just my $.o2 - -Original Message- From: David Hornby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 3:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF TOPIC (Slightly) - Surfcontrol Is anyone currently using SurfControls Superscout E-mail filter (Or even their web filter)?? I am currently using MAILsweeper for exchange but I am currently upgrading all of our systems. I have tried the Super scout web filter but not the E-mail filter. I'm really just after an idea how good Surf control is compared to MAILsweeper. Any help much appreciated Dave - -- Dave Hornby Technical Support Analyst - -- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com iQA/AwUBPB9LorlMSqGNvpxoEQIjNQCg+9NW7769jjRGMlSy7cWYAbzZgPYAnRg7 8kWO09T73KijFc0ScXLQ0cyh =S/7G -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I'm running only MAPI mode and I can't get the notifications to come to me either. When I try a test at the server I get a MAPI error. I installed an old Exchange mapi client and that didn't help. I made sure there was a valid scanmail profile on the server and that didn't help. Trend wanted me to install a bunch of debug stuff on the server and that isn't going to happen since it's a beastly cluster (ugh) and now we're in freeze anyway. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed. As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I get the administrative notifications. I'm talking about a user that sends an infected message. He does not recieve a notification that he sent an infected message. Only the recipient receives a message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed. As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
That could also be another limitation of the AVAPI, but I cant remember -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? I get the administrative notifications. I'm talking about a user that sends an infected message. He does not recieve a notification that he sent an infected message. Only the recipient receives a message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed. As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I don't use the avapi but for mapi mode that is a check box. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? I get the administrative notifications. I'm talking about a user that sends an infected message. He does not recieve a notification that he sent an infected message. Only the recipient receives a message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed. As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
m Box of Checks... -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? I don't use the avapi but for mapi mode that is a check box. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? I get the administrative notifications. I'm talking about a user that sends an infected message. He does not recieve a notification that he sent an infected message. Only the recipient receives a message. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed. As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 6:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing? Exchange 5.5 SP4, ScanMail 3.52 We upgraded to ScanMail 3.52 and are running in both AVAPI and MAPI mode. I understand that running AVAPI, you lose the sender/recipient information for viruses caught in the log files. I'm a little confused on my testing on how notification works. I sent a test virus to a mailbox on our system and I did not receive a notification that I sent a infected message. The recipient, on the other hand, did receive a message from my account and had a text file entitled Virus1_Detected_and_Removed_virusname.txt. Shouldn't I have received a message as well. I have the real time scan set to send message to sender,recipient,administrator. One other question. Since I do not get the actual sender notifications in the log files now, I cannot determine where/who may be triggering an outbreak. Since the recipient gets a attachment with the Virus1x.txt message is there a way to track this through the MTA tracking log files. Is there a diagnostic key on the MTA that will include the attachment name sent on messages? Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis, Suhler Associates, Inc. by telephone, fax, or email and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
Try logging out and back in and then deleting. Tom -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After all that just start up the services again. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
err, stop scanmail services and try. Will be just your luck the latest melissa will come out during that 5 minute window. What version of scanmail? Did it move the file based on infection or attachment blocking? You say the mp3 file is listed as a shortcut, it has a .lnk extension or just the mp3 extension? Adding mp2;mp3 to your attachment blocking list may be a good idea, especially if the file is locked for some reason by scanmail scanning the attachment. See past thread Attachment Nazi Mrs. Jennifer Baker had the bomb (read atom) list of attachments to stop. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
I'm going to during non-prime time. It took me a couple of days to track down why this was occuring. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After all that just start up the services again. -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization. -Original Message- From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or attrib from a DOS prompt? Allan -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU This is going to be a little off topic, but I thought I would post it in case someone ran into it as well. I have ScanMail moving infected files. One of the files that was moved into the \VIRUS area was a FUN.MP3 that is listed as a short cut. I cannot delete due to a sharing violation (believe ScanMail still has locked). Once you try to delete or look at the attributes, your NT workstation jumps up to 100% CPU utilization for EXPLORER. Even disconnecting the mapped drive does not clear EXPLORER.EXE and the only way to get your workstation back is to reboot. I duplicated this on 3 NT workstations. Two running NT 4.0 sp6a one running sp5. Took me 3 days to determine what was causing my workstation to go crazy. I sure won't clear the areas from the server console. I can just see me killing the box! Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: off topic - Account lockout
I agree with Joe. Go get ERD Commander now and it will save you gobs of time in the future... it is priced quite reasonable. Aaron -Original Message- From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: off topic - Account lockout ERD Commander is a great tool for this and other general Nt admin items www.sysinternals.com I dont know if the demo version will allow you to change a password. The tool is invaluable however IMHO. -Original Message- From: Sethi, Ali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 4:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: off topic - Account lockout Does anyone have some sort of hack tool that will allow you to change the local admin password on a workstation and get into the OS? We took a machine off the domain but didn't realize that the local admin password was not set to the company default password. Also is there is way to just load the windows 2k cd in and restart the pc and have it so that it only does a reinstall and does not format the drive? Thanks, _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic...apologies...
I posted some stuff earlier that touched on this subject. I too was impacted by the ATT tragedy. However, I am using the @Business service and was told that it was a independant of ATT @ Home Service. However, I was not aware that they were using Excite as a portal either. Anyway I've had to reconstruct my WAN using 2 NAT boxes (DHCP) and an NT 4.0 Proxy Server. This is my only suggestion. Purchase a cheap NAT box like Linksys or construct one out of NT 2000 or NT 4. Have the DHCP address assigned to the WAN interface of the NAT Box. Give the external Proxy server nic an invalid address like 192.168.1.2 the gateway would be 192.168.1.1 (LAN Side of NAT Box). This will get your proxy server up and running. However, you will need to make several adjustments on your outside DNS once you know your DHCP assigned address. The cool thing about the Linksys and other NAT boxes is that it supports port forwarding also. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 11:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off topic...apologies... I seem to remember that this may have been touched on before. ATT Broadband has taken over my cable modem services (at home, not work.) I used to have a static IP from the previous provider but now it's DHCP. I want to maintain my home network which is: NT4 server with Proxy 2.0 and several W2K clients. Has anyone sucessfully configured something like this and if so, how did you do it? Equipment recommendations appreciated as well. You can respond to my personally so as not to clog up the list. Thanks. Bill Lambert, MCP,MCSE Network Consultant Endoxy Healthcare 847-941-9206 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: off topic ( Audiogalaxy)
I hear he's pretty quick off the snap. Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jojo.solis Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 11:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: off topic ( Audiogalaxy) Is there a way to block Audiogalaxy? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
I think that would be OT: Turkey shake Was: W3SVC? Directories. I vehemently object to your email - what's with the paprika? Are you crazy? - Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Fathers can be hard to please. That's why I stopped making my father blended concoctions of ground turkey, Hershey's syrup, milk, paprika, and canned pears. I only bake brownies and cakes for the whole family nowadays. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Naw, too much work. -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Ooh ooh Me me, I'm spoilin' for a fight! *Flings mud all over the group* :) -cm -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories And there is nothing in Kelly's reply that implies otherwise. She answered his question and pointed him to appropriate resources. Your reply, on the other hand, rather strongly hints at that of someone spoiling for a fight. - Original Message - From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
I would violently object to his email, but only if I had to eat what it describes... Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: I think that would be OT: Turkey shake Was: W3SVC? Directories. I vehemently object to your email - what's with the paprika? Are you crazy? - Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Fathers can be hard to please. That's why I stopped making my father blended concoctions of ground turkey, Hershey's syrup, milk, paprika, and canned pears. I only bake brownies and cakes for the whole family nowadays. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Naw, too much work. -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Ooh ooh Me me, I'm spoilin' for a fight! *Flings mud all over the group* :) -cm -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories And there is nothing in Kelly's reply that implies otherwise. She answered his question and pointed him to appropriate resources. Your reply, on the other hand, rather strongly hints at that of someone spoiling for a fight. - Original Message - From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
You know the really sick thing is I don't think he's kidding. I work with a guy that was talking about making turkey shakes with leftover Thanksgiving turkey. Ack! Dude, you couldn't get me to do that on a bet after I had a twelve-pack in me. Tom. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: I would violently object to his email, but only if I had to eat what it describes... Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: I think that would be OT: Turkey shake Was: W3SVC? Directories. I vehemently object to your email - what's with the paprika? Are you crazy? - Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Fathers can be hard to please. That's why I stopped making my father blended concoctions of ground turkey, Hershey's syrup, milk, paprika, and canned pears. I only bake brownies and cakes for the whole family nowadays. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Naw, too much work. -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Ooh ooh Me me, I'm spoilin' for a fight! *Flings mud all over the group* :) -cm -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories And there is nothing in Kelly's reply that implies otherwise. She answered his question and pointed him to appropriate resources. Your reply, on the other hand, rather strongly hints at that of someone spoiling for a fight. - Original Message - From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Ooh ooh Me me, I'm spoilin' for a fight! *Flings mud all over the group* :) -cm -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories And there is nothing in Kelly's reply that implies otherwise. She answered his question and pointed him to appropriate resources. Your reply, on the other hand, rather strongly hints at that of someone spoiling for a fight. - Original Message - From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
Naw, too much work. -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Ooh ooh Me me, I'm spoilin' for a fight! *Flings mud all over the group* :) -cm -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories And there is nothing in Kelly's reply that implies otherwise. She answered his question and pointed him to appropriate resources. Your reply, on the other hand, rather strongly hints at that of someone spoiling for a fight. - Original Message - From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
Fathers can be hard to please. That's why I stopped making my father blended concoctions of ground turkey, Hershey's syrup, milk, paprika, and canned pears. I only bake brownies and cakes for the whole family nowadays. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: Naw, too much work. -Original Message- From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories: May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort. Thanks, Bill -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Ooh ooh Me me, I'm spoilin' for a fight! *Flings mud all over the group* :) -cm -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories And there is nothing in Kelly's reply that implies otherwise. She answered his question and pointed him to appropriate resources. Your reply, on the other hand, rather strongly hints at that of someone spoiling for a fight. - Original Message - From: Elizabeth Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:37 PM Subject: RE: W3SVC? Directories Hm...it strikes me that Jason may not have known to associate these files with IIS and therefore would not have known to go searching IIS sites for the answer.perhaps??? Regards E. Note: The opinions in this e-mail are those of the sender in the capacity of a private e-mail only and not to be taken as a representation of the sender's company as a whole. I also regret to say that the moon is not made out of cheese and no-one is perfect, upman(or woman)ship is boring and life is not bad. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: W3SVC? Directories Because you have (or had) 3 websites. But this is really an IIS question, and there are many fine lists for IIS elsewhere. ~ -K.Borndale | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: W3SVC? Directories Under our WINNT\SYSTEM32\LOGS directory, there are 3 directories: W3SVC1 W3SVC2 W3SVC3 Why are there three of these? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
lol Those are pretty funny... -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
http://www.netgain.co.nz/egypt.htm http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/close/gi45/egypt/papyrus.htm Main Entry: sta·tio·nery Pronunciation: 'stA-sh-ner-E Function: noun Etymology: stationer Date: circa 1688 1 : materials (as paper, pens, and ink) for writing or typing 2 : letter paper usually accompanied with matching envelopes -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic Kinda Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
HTML email is fun. But... not practical for most uses. http://www.expita.com/nomime.html Try an Outlook forum... William -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic Kinda Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
Ignore my pointless off topic I like the pictures better. I think I found almost every one in this discussion board in that website. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda lol Those are pretty funny... -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
Are you sure he's not a target? There is a fine line between the two! -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
They do look both ways. Up and down. -Original Message- From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda Wondering: Do trolls look both ways before crossing the street? Or do they ask everyone around them if a car is coming? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic Kinda Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
While I think the attribute is appropriate, I also think the point of the attribute is sorely missed by a few participants of this list: Trolls are to be ignored. Trolls stop their inane posts when--and only when--they notice 1 of 1 responses to them in the list. On that note, I hate the fact that I am responsible for one more increment in this thread. C'est la vie.. -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda Are you sure he's not a target? There is a fine line between the two! -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
uh uh Garble/Net Rat -Original Message- From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/31/01 12:11 PM Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda Are you sure he's not a target? There is a fine line between the two! -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
Never though of troll from a fisherman's point of view (I'm more of a shopper, than a fisher). I always thought it meant more like the Billy Goats Gruff kind of troll: http://www.sterlingtimes.co.uk/bill_goats_gruff.htm ...Joel -Original Message- From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda troll.. http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html ~steve Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF topic **
You can do this pretty easily with perl. Use the Net::rexec module or the Net::Telnet module and then compile with perl2exe. === Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071 -- Eating XXX Chili at Texas Chili Parlor since 1989 -- === -Original Message- From: Romero, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 5:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OFF topic ** Hi all do you know of any Freeware telnet or similar product that will let me to automate the following in a batch file telnet ip login password change tu superuser mode run some commands logout from that server the batch file should be run froma WindowsPc to telnet to a Unix server. TIA -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Off Topic Kinda
Good stationery Oxymoron. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Off Topic Kinda Does anyone know a good program or books for making good stationery HTML for outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!! Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OFF topic **
http://www.5star-shareware.com/Utilities/General/keytext.html or search on keytext. Keytext is a very robust macro and keyboard stroke recorder. You can record keystrokes, mouse movements, left and right clicks and double clicks too. Mike Hi all do you know of any Freeware telnet or similar product that will let me to automate the following in a batch file telnet ip login password change tu superuser mode run some commands logout from that server the batch file should be run froma WindowsPc to telnet to a Unix server. TIA -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OFF topic **
I don't think it would be a good idea to have a unix superuser password in a batch file (text). A program that does macros and could scramble the info would be the way to go. Hi all do you know of any Freeware telnet or similar product that will let me to automate the following in a batch file telnet ip login password change tu superuser mode run some commands logout from that server the batch file should be run froma WindowsPc to telnet to a Unix server. TIA -ER _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
