Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread Peter


--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
 
  --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI
  program. it is
  incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.
 
  Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole
 of
  SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis
 program
  and it is completely compatable with MMY's
 program.
  You don't know what you're talking about.
 
 
 Thanks Dr. Pete!

I love these people that talk about something they
have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think
I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation
technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat
Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world
will co-author the article with me.





__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread Peter


--- Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
  
   --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  
   A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI
   program. it is
   incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.
  
   Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole
 of
   SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis
 program
   and it is completely compatable with MMY's
 program.
   You don't know what you're talking about.
  
 I wasn't speaking on whether the techniques which
 Ravi teaches are 
 compatible or not;
 I assume they would be, since I was inferring that
 they are what 
 Maharishi teaches;
 I was just wondering how much credit he gives to
 Maharishi, for this 
 teaching;
 In the same way, I was wondering, how much credit
 Deepak Chopra;
 Gives to Maharishi, for all the knowledge he
 plagerized from him.
 That's all.
 I just wanted to bitch.
 Nothing personal;
 I just think it's strange that these people teach
 what Maharishi 
 teaches, and just never give him any credit.

I understand. SSRS primary emphasis is on teaching his
Sudarshan Kriya and secondarily on what he calls Sahaj
Samadhi meditation.





 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 To subscribe, send a message to:
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Or go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
 and click 'Join This Group!' 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  
 
 
 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj


On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:16 PM, Robert Gimbel wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:  --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI program. it is incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.  Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole of SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis program and it is completely compatable with MMY's program. You don't know what you're talking about.  I wasn't speaking on whether the techniques which Ravi teaches are  compatible or not; I assume they would be, since I was inferring that they are what  Maharishi teaches; I was just wondering how much credit he gives to Maharishi, for this  teaching; In the same way, I was wondering, how much credit Deepak Chopra; Gives to Maharishi, for all the knowledge he plagerized from him. That's all. I just wanted to bitch. Nothing personal; I just think it's strange that these people teach what Maharishi  teaches, and just never give him any credit. It's generic dude. 
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj


On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:  --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI program. it is incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.  Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole of SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis program and it is completely compatable with MMY's program. You don't know what you're talking about.   Thanks Dr. Pete!  I love these people that talk about something they have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world will co-author the article with me. Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just to be sure to maintain purity!
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread Paul Mason
M you seem to be suggesting that since Rick has formed an opinion 
about MMYs sexuality that I should necessarilly trust 
his 'judgement', but then you go on to condemn firm believers. Again 
you attempt to persuade me to your viewpoint by waving 
Rick's 'credibility', but that is the same argument as saying look, 
John Lennon wrote 'Sexy Sadie', so it must be true that MMY was up to 
no good. But why not sift the evidence, read all the other reports of 
those who were there, not just John Lennon's? Why should anyone take 
John Lennon's word? What did he know about the matter? Read his 
words, confused accounts, jumbled, garbled and disjointed. Yeah, love 
the man, but he didn't know the truth about MMYs sexuality any better 
than the others on the course.

And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on earth 
should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never met the 
man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using anything he 
could to try and discredit him. It seems their friction goes a long 
way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.

Now, you argue the 'girlfriends' need protection, but why doesn't 
Swaroopanand ever repeat and press his points again publicly?

It appears that actually you and Rick ( others) are 'firm 
believers', but fortunately Rick is not asking me to trust his 
judgement, in fact he tells me:- 'You're welcome to take anything I 
or anything anyone else says with a grain of salt. In fact, you 
should.'






 






--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Unless there is some reason you distrust Rick's judgement--and 
many  
 firm believers *may not even believe it if they hear it from one 
of  
 the women who was subjected to the spiritual incest*--it's pretty  
 damning when someone as credible as Rick talks directly, firsthand  
 and shares the story. This is way beyond rumor, he's talked to the  
 women. And of course we need to respect their right to heal, 
process  
 and move in and not be trapped in endless questions and attacks 
from  
 hundreds or thousands of questioners. So it's also important to  
 protect those who shared this. I think you are mistaking the need 
to  
 protect the abused for something unclear or contrived.
 
 It became clearer to me why this was important with the Swami Rama  
 sex scandals where he really damaged a lot of women and few would  
 come out and tell their stories. Those that did were subjected to 
a  
 living hell. And that was a much smaller movement.
 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Paul Mason wrote:
 
  Anyone who sets themselves above others gets notched up the 
measure
  of accountability and MMY is no exception. Sex and drugs stories 
sell
  well, but in reality there are more serious temptations for a
  spiritual leader and in order to determine whether or not such 
people
  exploit their positions, it is wise to keep a close eye on their
  behaviour.
 
  I am not at all opposed to people questioning the 'saintliness' of
  MMY, but I am uncomfortable that FFL no longer merely raises about
  his sexuality but presents the rumours as facts.
 
  Legally speaking, being the conduit of a rumour is one thing, but
  presenting it as fact is really quite another.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Christfest: more popular than The Beatles

2006-08-04 Thread Nick
On a related note, the book THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO THE BEATLES by 
Steve Turner came out today. I've been flipping through it and it 
seems pretty good. I'm shocked to find that I agree with Yoko in some 
of her opinions of gurus. It's a very thorough analysis of 
spirituality in the lives of the fab four. ===-=-=- om==-=-=- Nick
 

Subject: ChristFest in City Park: More Popular Than the Beatles


ChristFest in City Park: More Popular Than the Beatles 
By: Trey Merril, Entertainment Columnist
Updated: 15 days ago
Contemporary Christian music and the power of prayer have brought to 
life the spirit of Jesus at the First Annual ChristFest to be held in 
Tad Gormley Stadium Friday July 21 through Sunday.  

If my memory serves me right, it was the late John Lennon that turned 
the world upside down by uttering the now infamous 
worlds Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. ... We're 
more popular than Jesus now.

That may have been in yesteryear but it seems that Beatles fans 
aren't the only ones that can command a City Park audience.  The buzz 
is slightly different these days but as the Biblical Christ, City 
Park has risen from the ashes and the Beatles are now but a footnote 
in history.  Rather than shrink and vanish, the Christian movement 
has grown tremendously and both contemporary Christian and Gospel 
music have seen a major resurrection.

City Park will play host to the legions of self-proclaimed Jesus 
Freaks and God Squads, from July 21 to 23.  What was once considered 
an insult these days is held as a badge of honor for the 50,000 
people expected to attend.  

The event will feature a variety of music, motivational speakers, 
pastors, city and government officials, Spanish and deaf ministries, 
children's games, door prizes and great food.  In breaking divisions, 
Ambassadors of Christ hope to promote unity among the Christian 
community.  
 
Upon completion of the ChristFest, the group plans on creating Camp 
Salvation, a safe haven for homeless and transient youth.  The camp 
will be the New Orleans Headquarters for the festival promoter, 
Ambassadors of Christ.  Their committed to showing love for people by 
focusing on each persons self-worth and striving to achieve the 
highest levels of excellence.

On a final note, Lennon apologized for his remarks.  The Archbishop 
of Boston admitted that Lennon was probably right but still some 
people refused to forgive him.  Seems that most of those who didn't, 
forgot forgiveness was the ultimate lesson taught by Jesus.  

Take a listen to the Lennon lyrics Imagine and Give Peace a 
Chance.  I guess we've all stuck our foot in our mouths before.  His 
owns songs sound close to Christian doctrine to me, don't you 
think?   
 .
The Beatles sold out City Park Stadium on September 16, 1964 at $5 a 
ticket.  ChristFest is free.  

For more information, visit www.christfestneworleans.com. 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread Robert Gimbel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Paul Mason 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 M you seem to be suggesting that since Rick has formed an 
opinion 
 about MMYs sexuality that I should necessarilly trust 
 his 'judgement', but then you go on to condemn firm believers. 
Again 
 you attempt to persuade me to your viewpoint by waving 
 Rick's 'credibility', but that is the same argument as saying look, 
 John Lennon wrote 'Sexy Sadie', so it must be true that MMY was up 
to 
 no good. But why not sift the evidence, read all the other reports 
of 
 those who were there, not just John Lennon's? Why should anyone 
take 
 John Lennon's word? What did he know about the matter? Read his 
 words, confused accounts, jumbled, garbled and disjointed. Yeah, 
love 
 the man, but he didn't know the truth about MMYs sexuality any 
better 
 than the others on the course.
 
 And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on earth 
 should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never met 
the 
 man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using anything he 
 could to try and discredit him. It seems their friction goes a long 
 way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.
 
 Now, you argue the 'girlfriends' need protection, but why doesn't 
 Swaroopanand ever repeat and press his points again publicly?
 
 It appears that actually you and Rick ( others) are 'firm 
 believers', but fortunately Rick is not asking me to trust his 
 judgement, in fact he tells me:- 'You're welcome to take anything I 
 or anything anyone else says with a grain of salt. In fact, you 
 should.'
 

And, besides, what is the motive in this;
What is the motive for Maharishi to be involved with anything 
negative towards Guru Dev?
What would be the motivation for Maharishi go get involved with any 
woman, in a secret way?
Both of these things seem so out of character to me;
I just write them off as complete and total nonesense.












 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  Unless there is some reason you distrust Rick's judgement--and 
 many  
  firm believers *may not even believe it if they hear it from one 
 of  
  the women who was subjected to the spiritual incest*--it's 
pretty  
  damning when someone as credible as Rick talks directly, 
firsthand  
  and shares the story. This is way beyond rumor, he's talked to 
the  
  women. And of course we need to respect their right to heal, 
 process  
  and move in and not be trapped in endless questions and attacks 
 from  
  hundreds or thousands of questioners. So it's also important to  
  protect those who shared this. I think you are mistaking the need 
 to  
  protect the abused for something unclear or contrived.
  
  It became clearer to me why this was important with the Swami 
Rama  
  sex scandals where he really damaged a lot of women and few 
would  
  come out and tell their stories. Those that did were subjected to 
 a  
  living hell. And that was a much smaller movement.
  
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Paul Mason wrote:
  
   Anyone who sets themselves above others gets notched up the 
 measure
   of accountability and MMY is no exception. Sex and drugs 
stories 
 sell
   well, but in reality there are more serious temptations for a
   spiritual leader and in order to determine whether or not such 
 people
   exploit their positions, it is wise to keep a close eye on their
   behaviour.
  
   I am not at all opposed to people questioning the 'saintliness' 
of
   MMY, but I am uncomfortable that FFL no longer merely raises 
about
   his sexuality but presents the rumours as facts.
  
   Legally speaking, being the conduit of a rumour is one thing, 
but
   presenting it as fact is really quite another.
 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] I Snark, Therefore I Am (feeling better, if not superior)

2006-08-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:
 
  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
 

 
  I love these people that talk about something they
  have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think
  I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation
  technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat
  Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world
  will co-author the article with me.
 
 
 Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just to be  
 sure to maintain purity!

Such a feast of snarky  comments! 

Its fun! its a nice release of frustration with stupid or at least
'limited' others. I do it. We all do. 

As if there is 'an other.

Its sort of passive-aggressive.  Or perhaps, if that is not
technically correct -- its something similar. 

And what is the result? More snarky comments by those snarked. And
what does that lead to? Yes -- you are catching on. Good insight. 

Whats the way out of this odd loopy mobius strip of snaky insults? Yes
-- you got it. I always knew *you* were one of the bright ones.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 
 What would be the motivation for Maharishi go get involved with any 
 woman, 

The same motivation for ice cream?  He likes it? 

(These were quite shakti-dripping beautiful women.)

Whats your motivation to get involved with any woman? 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj


On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Paul Mason wrote:M you seem to be suggesting that since Rick has formed an opinion  about MMYs sexuality that I should necessarilly trust  his 'judgement', but then you go on to condemn firm believers.Well no, I think you should question everything and practice responsible, individual anarchy.I don't feel Rick has "formed an opinion" but instead went "ad fuentes", to the source and found out. This was not easy to do. Again  you attempt to persuade me to your viewpoint by waving  Rick's 'credibility', but that is the same argument as saying look,  John Lennon wrote 'Sexy Sadie', so it must be true that MMY was up to  no good.Well, honestly, I'd have to say JL has little credibility although, if correct, an interestingly accurate intuition of the situation. It's my understanding that after the course was his and Yoko's debacle with heroin. In other words, the relaxation and unstressing of Rishikesh put John in a frame of mind where he could not process his unresolved past. So he tried to numb it on heroin. With the love of his life. Given his past, this is not hard to see. What's sad is that there was no framework for processing then in the TMO (or now!). He was able to suppress it through the life of a Beatlemaniac.But really this has no bearing on Rick's first hand comments. But why not sift the evidence, read all the other reports of  those who were there, not just John Lennon's? Why should anyone take  John Lennon's word? What did he know about the matter? Read his  words, confused accounts, jumbled, garbled and disjointed. Yeah, love  the man, but he didn't know the truth about MMYs sexuality any better  than the others on the course.See the above.  And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on earth  should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never met the  man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using anything he  could to try and discredit him. It seems their friction goes a long  way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.Honestly? I think it remains an unresolved question, but it's important to pose the question.We'll most likely never know. We just know that something looks suspicious. And who was there and what they did.  Now, you argue the 'girlfriends' need protection, but why doesn't  Swaroopanand ever repeat and press his points again publicly?The "girlfriend" really have nothing to do with Swarupanand.  It appears that actually you and Rick ( others) are 'firm  believers', but fortunately Rick is not asking me to trust his  judgement, in fact he tells me:- 'You're welcome to take anything I  or anything anyone else says with a grain of salt. In fact, you  should.' And as a recorder of a biogrpahy you definitely should. But you should at least point out the questions that are raised--even if that means you have to leave the questions unanswered. The truth is, we may never really know.It's also possible that those who know are, relatively speaking, the poorest of the poor living in India. They fear the slightest problem and so remain quiet.Never forget, that money, to a poor struggling Indian, is siddhi.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread randymeltzer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:
 
  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
 
  --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI
  program. it is
  incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.
 
  Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole
  of
  SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis
  program
  and it is completely compatable with MMY's
  program.
  You don't know what you're talking about.
 
 
  Thanks Dr. Pete!
 
  I love these people that talk about something they
  have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think
  I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation
  technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat
  Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world
  will co-author the article with me.
 
 
 Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just to be  
 sure to maintain purity!

What is the official position of the art of living organization 
regarding whether Maharishi approves of what SSRS is doing?  I tried 
to ask him directly once and he skirted the question.
I'm sure you've all heard the quote that MMY said of SSRS candy 
coated poison






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:
 snip
   The other aspect is purely social and has nothing 
   *whatsoever* to do with the biological aspect.  The 
   social aspect involves the exploitation of an unequal 
   power relationship for selfish purposes and its 
   negative psychological consequences.  As such, 
   of course, it is by no means unique to incestuous 
   relationships. 
  
  Like Bill's relationship to Monica?
 
 Obviously.
 
 Your point was what, exactly?


It wasn't a point, it was a question.

You see, in the English language the ? symbol at the end of a 
sentence denotes a question.

As the Author's Friend you should know that without me telling you.










To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Christfest: more popular than The Beatles

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj
attachment: normal_forgive.jpg


On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:34 PM, Nick wrote:


On a related note, the book THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO THE BEATLES by
Steve Turner came out today. I've been flipping through it and it
seems pretty good. I'm shocked to find that I agree with Yoko in some
of her opinions of gurus. It's a very thorough analysis of
spirituality in the lives of the fab four. ===-=-=- om==-=-=- Nick


Subject: ChristFest in City Park: More Popular Than the Beatles


ChristFest in City Park: More Popular Than the Beatles
By: Trey Merril, Entertainment Columnist
Updated: 15 days ago
Contemporary Christian music and the power of prayer have brought to
life the spirit of Jesus at the First Annual ChristFest to be held in
Tad Gormley Stadium Friday July 21 through Sunday.

If my memory serves me right, it was the late John Lennon that turned
the world upside down by uttering the now infamous
worlds Christianity will go. It will vanish and shrink. ... We're
more popular than Jesus now.

That may have been in yesteryear but it seems that Beatles fans
aren't the only ones that can command a City Park audience.  The buzz
is slightly different these days but as the Biblical Christ, City
Park has risen from the ashes and the Beatles are now but a footnote
in history.  Rather than shrink and vanish, the Christian movement
has grown tremendously and both contemporary Christian and Gospel
music have seen a major resurrection.

City Park will play host to the legions of self-proclaimed Jesus
Freaks and God Squads, from July 21 to 23.  What was once considered
an insult these days is held as a badge of honor for the 50,000
people expected to attend.

The event will feature a variety of music, motivational speakers,
pastors, city and government officials, Spanish and deaf ministries,
children's games, door prizes and great food.  In breaking divisions,
Ambassadors of Christ hope to promote unity among the Christian
community.

Upon completion of the ChristFest, the group plans on creating Camp
Salvation, a safe haven for homeless and transient youth.  The camp
will be the New Orleans Headquarters for the festival promoter,
Ambassadors of Christ.  Their committed to showing love for people by
focusing on each persons self-worth and striving to achieve the
highest levels of excellence.

On a final note, Lennon apologized for his remarks.  The Archbishop
of Boston admitted that Lennon was probably right but still some
people refused to forgive him.  Seems that most of those who didn't,
forgot forgiveness was the ultimate lesson taught by Jesus.

Take a listen to the Lennon lyrics Imagine and Give Peace a
Chance.  I guess we've all stuck our foot in our mouths before.  His
owns songs sound close to Christian doctrine to me, don't you
think?
 .
The Beatles sold out City Park Stadium on September 16, 1964 at $5 a
ticket.  ChristFest is free.

For more information, visit www.christfestneworleans.com.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'
Yahoo! Groups Links











Re: [FairfieldLife] I Snark, Therefore I Am (feeling better, if not superior)

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj


On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:36 PM, new.morning wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:  --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:I love these people that talk about something they have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world will co-author the article with me.   Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just to be   sure to maintain purity!  Such a feast of snarky  comments!   Its fun! its a nice release of frustration with "stupid or at least 'limited' others". I do it. We all do.   As if there is 'an other".  Its sort of passive-aggressive.  Or perhaps, if that is not technically correct -- its something similar.   And what is the result? More snarky comments by those snarked. And what does that lead to? Yes -- you are catching on. Good insight. Hopefully it leads to rib splitting laughter.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI
  program. it is
  incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.
 
 Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole of
 SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis program
 and it is completely compatable with MMY's program.
 You don't know what you're talking about. 



Enjoy:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/87381




 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj


On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:56 PM, randymeltzer wrote:What is the official position of the art of living organization  regarding whether Maharishi approves of what SSRS is doing?  I tried  to ask him directly once and he skirted the question. I'm sure you've all heard the quote that MMY said of SSRS "candy  coated poison" I propose that the oft quoted words of M. where he says (gross paraphrase) that those who know how to teach TM should go ahead and do it as long they do it correctly, is actually meant to refer to SSRS, not "independent" non-recertified TM teachers (as is often presupposed).Indeed, after this event, SSRS held a Woodstock of pranayama and meditation instruction in India where he initiated more people into inner space than any known human in historical times: millions of humans. All at once.I think M. quietly sanctioned the whole event.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:56 PM, randymeltzer wrote:
 
  What is the official position of the art of living organization
  regarding whether Maharishi approves of what SSRS is doing?  I tried
  to ask him directly once and he skirted the question.
  I'm sure you've all heard the quote that MMY said of SSRS candy
  coated poison
 
 
 I propose that the oft quoted words of M. where he says (gross  
 paraphrase) that those who know how to teach TM should go ahead and  
 do it as long they do it correctly, is actually meant to refer to  
 SSRS, not independent non-recertified TM teachers (as is often  
 presupposed).
 
 Indeed, after this event, SSRS held a Woodstock of pranayama and  
 meditation instruction in India where he initiated more people into  
 inner space than any known human in historical times: millions of  
 humans. All at once.
 
 I think M. quietly sanctioned the whole event.

And when we have thoughts, we silently, effortless come back to the
mantra.









To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Paul Mason wrote:
snip
  And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on earth
  should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never met 
  the man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using 
  anything he could to try and discredit him. It seems their 
  friction goes a long way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.
 
 Honestly? I think it remains an unresolved question, but it's  
 important to pose the question.

No, no.  You didn't mention it in the form of a
question, you mentioned it as an established
fact.  You said you had heard about the murder
from your friend.

 We'll most likely never know. We just know that something looks  
 suspicious. And who was there and what they did.

What do we know looks suspicious?  Who do we know was
there and what do we know they did?







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
   wrote:
  snip
The other aspect is purely social and has nothing 
*whatsoever* to do with the biological aspect.  The 
social aspect involves the exploitation of an unequal 
power relationship for selfish purposes and its 
negative psychological consequences.  As such, 
of course, it is by no means unique to incestuous 
relationships. 
   
   Like Bill's relationship to Monica?
  
  Obviously.
  
  Your point was what, exactly?
 
 It wasn't a point, it was a question.

The point of your question was what, exactly?

 You see, in the English language the ? symbol at the end of a 
 sentence denotes a question.
 
 As the Author's Friend you should know that without me telling you.

What I know without you telling me is that you
weren't asking for information.  There was a point
you were trying to make *in the guise of* a question.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: MMY : Celibacy and TMO Teachers

2006-08-04 Thread Bhairitu
Vaj wrote:


 On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:22 PM, new.morning wrote:

 Well, since your yogic powers are not sufficient to breaktrough
 Sony's superficial protection scheme, here is what S. said:

 If people knew the real reason for using a deerskin to meditate on,
 there would be a great shortage of deerskins.



 Here's the traditional qualities of a deerskin asana:

 It gives special siddhis, liberates from bondage and ensures one is  
 never short of money.

 Also:

 -subjugation of the senses
 -sublimation of sensuality
 -achieving realization or a state of total awareness
 -siddhis
 -curing diseases caused by an aggravated mind and piita and blood  
 diseases
 -increases individual magnetism

 Akashic Records, shelf 104890344329.99231

 But I have to tell you, it always creeped me out seeing people who  
 claimed to be vegetarians sitting on a dead deer hide.

The best deer hide is supposed to be black deer.  Since hunting deer is 
illegal in India I suspect they get the hides from outside the country?  
One probably could get black deer hides out of Tibet.  The taxidermist I 
got my deer hide from said there are some black deer in Texas.  Deer 
hides really shed even when properly treated.  I understand that is why 
antelope hides are frequently used instead.  I also ordered online from 
a deer farm in Canada but the hides didn't have the proper treatment and 
really shed too easy.



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread new . morning
I've taken and practiced the whole of SSRS's program -- at least as 
taught in week long advanced courses -- not TTCs, and done other tape
courses -- Bhakti sutras, Ashtavakra Gita, etc. as far as was
available up to 2001 or so (has a lot changed?). And have done TM for
almost 40 years (yikes) and TM siddhis program. 

AoL is compatable with MMY's program in a strict sense. Many AoLers
who are from TMland do TM meditation -- and do not take the  the Aol
Meditation initiation. 

But, in my experience, this does not mean a two-ways street of
combatibility. TMO things (meditation, AV, etc...) are generally
accepted in Aol (they now have there AV, so maybe there is some bias
now). 

But Aol things would hardly be accepted in the TMO: bajans, hugging
saints (pundit-ji), estatic stuff, guided meditations, mood making
(per TM POV, not AoL's, eg. I belong to you embrace of 500 CPs, new
age / traditional exercises of staring in to others eyes, telling
life stories, sitting down and findingnothing but good things in
a partner/stranger, etc.  

And, when I was active in AoL, it was clear there was a line. Many
Aolers, when i was introduced  to them as a TMer, said, another one
crosses the line.. The presumption was, there is no going back. The
TMO will never accept you back now. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 --- shukra69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 
  A friend of mine has taken the whole SRI SRI
  program. it is
  incompatable with Maharishi's teaching.
 
 Well, I've actually taken and practice the whole of
 SSRS's program along with my TM and TM siddhis program
 and it is completely compatable with MMY's program.
 You don't know what you're talking about. 







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: MMY : Celibacy and TMO Teachers

2006-08-04 Thread new . morning
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Vaj wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:22 PM, new.morning wrote:
 
  Well, since your yogic powers are not sufficient to breaktrough
  Sony's superficial protection scheme, here is what S. said:
 
  If people knew the real reason for using a deerskin to meditate on,
  there would be a great shortage of deerskins.
 
 
 
  Here's the traditional qualities of a deerskin asana:
 
  It gives special siddhis, liberates from bondage and ensures one is  
  never short of money.
 
  Also:
 
  -subjugation of the senses
  -sublimation of sensuality
  -achieving realization or a state of total awareness
  -siddhis
  -curing diseases caused by an aggravated mind and piita and blood  
  diseases
  -increases individual magnetism
 
  Akashic Records, shelf 104890344329.99231
 
  But I have to tell you, it always creeped me out seeing people who  
  claimed to be vegetarians sitting on a dead deer hide.
 
 The best deer hide is supposed to be black deer.  Since hunting deer is 
 illegal in India I suspect they get the hides from outside the
country?  
 One probably could get black deer hides out of Tibet.  The
taxidermist I 
 got my deer hide from said there are some black deer in Texas.  Deer 
 hides really shed even when properly treated.  I understand that is why 
 antelope hides are frequently used instead.  I also ordered online from 
 a deer farm in Canada but the hides didn't have the proper treatment
and 
 really shed too easy.

Mine, from 1977, shed a lot, and split, tore, got quite woren, after 
years of sitting on it 9silk on top). I finally gave it a nice send
off. 








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread Vaj


On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:22 PM, authfriend wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:   On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Paul Mason wrote: snip And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on earth should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never met  the man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using  anything he could to try and discredit him. It seems their  friction goes a long way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.  Honestly? I think it remains an unresolved question, but it's   important to pose the question.  No, no.  You didn't mention it in the form of a question, you mentioned it as an established fact.  You said you had "heard about the murder" from your friend. Actually what I said was:"I first heard from one of the people mentioned in the Sexie Sadie article who interviewed one of the women. While I have not spoken to any of the women first hand, I did talk at length with this gentleman just after he talked to her--an old and close friend--and his recollection was just jaw dropping at the time. This wasn't just a rumor. He also was interestingly the first person I heard of the poisoning from."I did later add:"Yes, that he was the leading suspect. The first time I heard it was in the mid 80's after he returned from a pilgrimage to Jyotir Math and the Valley of the Flowers.Now THAT did shock me. It angered me to even hear it."This was to share my own shock, disbelief and inability to accept these events.Notice there is no mention of the word "murder" as Judy falsely claims.This is yet another example of why I ignore most of her posts: deliberate falsifications.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread Peter


--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:56 PM, randymeltzer wrote:
 
  What is the official position of the art of living
 organization
  regarding whether Maharishi approves of what SSRS
 is doing?  I tried
  to ask him directly once and he skirted the
 question.
  I'm sure you've all heard the quote that MMY said
 of SSRS candy
  coated poison
 
 
 I propose that the oft quoted words of M. where he
 says (gross  
 paraphrase) that those who know how to teach TM
 should go ahead and  
 do it as long they do it correctly, is actually
 meant to refer to  
 SSRS, not independent non-recertified TM teachers
 (as is often  
 presupposed).
 
 Indeed, after this event, SSRS held a Woodstock of
 pranayama and  
 meditation instruction in India where he initiated
 more people into  
 inner space than any known human in historical
 times: millions of  
 humans. All at once.
 
 I think M. quietly sanctioned the whole event.

SSRS loves MMY dearly and MMY loves SSRS dearly. As
SSRS said once about gurus, those who know, know and
those who don't, don't. 





__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 


To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:
   snip
 The other aspect is purely social and has nothing 
 *whatsoever* to do with the biological aspect.  The 
 social aspect involves the exploitation of an unequal 
 power relationship for selfish purposes and its 
 negative psychological consequences.  As such, 
 of course, it is by no means unique to incestuous 
 relationships. 

Like Bill's relationship to Monica?
   
   Obviously.
   
   Your point was what, exactly?
  
  It wasn't a point, it was a question.
 
 The point of your question was what, exactly?
 
  You see, in the English language the ? symbol at the end of a 
  sentence denotes a question.
  
  As the Author's Friend you should know that without me telling 
you.
 
 What I know without you telling me is that you
 weren't asking for information.  There was a point
 you were trying to make *in the guise of* a question.


Well, then, answer the question as posed and then I may decide to 
share the secrets of the universe with you.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: MMY : Celibacy and TMO Teachers

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Vaj wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:22 PM, new.morning wrote:
 
  Well, since your yogic powers are not sufficient to breaktrough
  Sony's superficial protection scheme, here is what S. said:
 
  If people knew the real reason for using a deerskin to 
meditate on,
  there would be a great shortage of deerskins.
 
 
 
  Here's the traditional qualities of a deerskin asana:
 
  It gives special siddhis, liberates from bondage and ensures one 
is  
  never short of money.
 
  Also:
 
  -subjugation of the senses
  -sublimation of sensuality
  -achieving realization or a state of total awareness
  -siddhis
  -curing diseases caused by an aggravated mind and piita and 
blood  
  diseases
  -increases individual magnetism
 
  Akashic Records, shelf 104890344329.99231
 
  But I have to tell you, it always creeped me out seeing people 
who  
  claimed to be vegetarians sitting on a dead deer hide.
 
 The best deer hide is supposed to be black deer.  Since hunting 
deer is 
 illegal in India I suspect they get the hides from outside the 
country?  
 One probably could get black deer hides out of Tibet.  The 
taxidermist I 
 got my deer hide from said there are some black deer in Texas.  
Deer 
 hides really shed even when properly treated.  I understand that 
is why 
 antelope hides are frequently used instead.  I also ordered online 
from 
 a deer farm in Canada but the hides didn't have the proper 
treatment and 
 really shed too easy.


Try Nauga Hyde.

Doesn't shed.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Could she be a TMer?

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
Not Exactly a Student of (Media) History (41 comments) 

Daryn Kagan is leaving her post as CNN morning anchor. I'm waiting 
till you steady yourselves from the blow. But wait, there's more. 
Ms. Kagan, a one-time squeeze of radio's Mr. Limbaugh, isn't leaving 
CNN to jump to another network at a hefty whatever in salary. 
Instead, she's starting up her own website, supposedly without 
backers, to create a community--wish we had one of those in our 
neighborhood--that would share inspiring stories. Here's what she's 
discovered during her TWELVE years as a CNN anchor:


I think there is a void in the straight news business now, (which 
is) lacking a certain spirituality, Kagan told The Associated Press 
on Thursday. I think most people live in a space where they are 
looking for meaning in life and good in the world and that is not 
necessarily reflected in straight news coverage right now.
.

Oh, for the good old days, when William Randolph Hearst's papers, 
teeming with spirituality, helped people find meaning in life and 
good in the world. Right now? Daryn, that's never been the purpose 
of the news media. Did they trick you at Career Day? Did Ted Turner 
hypnotize you? Did it really take you twelve years to discover the 
sad truth about the news media? Please share the inspiring story of 
your moment of discovery on your website soonest. Thanks.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 9:22 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:30 PM, Paul Mason wrote:
  snip
  And so it is with the alleged poisoning of Guru Dev, why on 
earth
  should I side with Shankaracharya Swami Swaroopanand? I never 
met
  the man and besides, in the interview with RK he was using
  anything he could to try and discredit him. It seems their
  friction goes a long way back, perhaps as far back as 1940.
 
  Honestly? I think it remains an unresolved question, but it's
  important to pose the question.
 
  No, no.  You didn't mention it in the form of a
  question, you mentioned it as an established
  fact.  You said you had heard about the murder
  from your friend.
 
 Actually what I said was:
 
 I first heard from one of the people mentioned in the Sexie Sadie  
 article who interviewed one of the women. While I have not spoken 
 to any of the women first hand, I did talk at length with this 
 gentleman just after he talked to her--an old and close friend--and 
 his recollection was just jaw dropping at the time. This wasn't 
 just a rumor. He also was interestingly the first person I heard of 
 the poisoning from.
 
 I did later add:
 
 Yes, that he was the leading suspect. The first time I heard it 
 was in the mid 80's after he returned from a pilgrimage to Jyotir 
 Math and the Valley of the Flowers.
 
 Now THAT did shock me. It angered me to even hear it.
 
 This was to share my own shock, disbelief and inability to accept  
 these events.

Events = things that actually happened.

Vaj doesn't choose his words at random.

 Notice there is no mention of the word murder as Judy falsely 
 claims.
 
 This is yet another example of why I ignore most of her posts:  
 deliberate falsifications.

Right.  Vaj pretends that the story about the
deliberate poisoning of Guru Dev somehow does
not involve the question of murder, then accuses
*me* of deliberate falsification.

Yes, Vaj, I inadvertently got the word wrong, but
only because the two are, as you know, synonymous
in this context.

All this is Vaj's attempt to distract attention
from my point, which is that he did *not* mention
the poisoning story as a question but rather as
an established fact.

I suppose his subsequent backpedaling is progress
of a sort.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread rmy108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 
 --- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:56 PM, randymeltzer wrote:
  
   What is the official position of the art of living
  organization
   regarding whether Maharishi approves of what SSRS
  is doing?  I tried
   to ask him directly once and he skirted the
  question.
   I'm sure you've all heard the quote that MMY said
  of SSRS candy
   coated poison
  
  
  I propose that the oft quoted words of M. where he
  says (gross  
  paraphrase) that those who know how to teach TM
  should go ahead and  
  do it as long they do it correctly, is actually
  meant to refer to  
  SSRS, not independent non-recertified TM teachers
  (as is often  
  presupposed).
  
  Indeed, after this event, SSRS held a Woodstock of
  pranayama and  
  meditation instruction in India where he initiated
  more people into  
  inner space than any known human in historical
  times: millions of  
  humans. All at once.
  
  I think M. quietly sanctioned the whole event.
 
 SSRS loves MMY dearly and MMY loves SSRS dearly. As
 SSRS said once about gurus, those who know, know and
 those who don't, don't. 
 
 
 IF SSRS loves MMY so much, how come its never mentioned in any of 
their publicity materials that he was MMY's disciple?
 
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
 http://mail.yahoo.com








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: I Snark, Therefore I Am (feeling better, if not superior)

2006-08-04 Thread elastomeric_brotherhood
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:
  
   --- Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
  
   On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
  
 
  
   I love these people that talk about something they
   have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think
   I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation
   technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat
   Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world
   will co-author the article with me.
  
  
  Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just to 
be  
  sure to maintain purity!
 
 Such a feast of snarky  comments! 
 
 Its fun! its a nice release of frustration with stupid or at least
 'limited' others. I do it. We all do. 
 
 As if there is 'an other.
 
 Its sort of passive-aggressive.  Or perhaps, if that is not
 technically correct -- its something similar. 
 
 And what is the result? More snarky comments by those snarked. And
 what does that lead to? Yes -- you are catching on. Good insight. 
 
 Whats the way out of this odd loopy mobius strip of snaky insults? 
Yes
 -- you got it. I always knew *you* were one of the bright ones.


Spare the snark, spoil the seeker.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
  shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend 
jstein@ 
 wrote:
snip
  The other aspect is purely social and has nothing 
  *whatsoever* to do with the biological aspect.  The 
  social aspect involves the exploitation of an unequal 
  power relationship for selfish purposes and its 
  negative psychological consequences.  As such, 
  of course, it is by no means unique to incestuous 
  relationships. 
 
 Like Bill's relationship to Monica?

Obviously.

Your point was what, exactly?
   
   It wasn't a point, it was a question.
  
  The point of your question was what, exactly?
  
   You see, in the English language the ? symbol at the end of a 
   sentence denotes a question.
   
   As the Author's Friend you should know that without me telling 
   you.
  
  What I know without you telling me is that you
  weren't asking for information.  There was a point
  you were trying to make *in the guise of* a question.
 
 Well, then, answer the question as posed and then I may decide to 
 share the secrets of the universe with you.

As you know, I already did.

Now you answer mine, please.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Does Shri Shri Ravi Shankar/Sell Techniques of Maharishi Maheshi Yogi?

2006-08-04 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:56 PM, randymeltzer wrote:
 
  What is the official position of the art of living organization
  regarding whether Maharishi approves of what SSRS is doing?  I tried
  to ask him directly once and he skirted the question.
  I'm sure you've all heard the quote that MMY said of SSRS candy
  coated poison
 
 
 I propose that the oft quoted words of M. where he says (gross  
 paraphrase) that those who know how to teach TM should go ahead and  
 do it as long they do it correctly, is actually meant to refer to  
 SSRS, not independent non-recertified TM teachers (as is often  
 presupposed).
 
 Indeed, after this event, SSRS held a Woodstock of pranayama and  
 meditation instruction in India where he initiated more people into  
 inner space than any known human in historical times: millions of  
 humans. All at once.
 
 I think M. quietly sanctioned the whole event.


Except, as far as I can tell, he initiated them into his breathing technique, 
not meditation...





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.





on 8/4/06 7:35 PM, Robert Gimbel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

And, besides, what is the motive in this;
What is the motive for Maharishi to be involved with anything 
negative towards Guru Dev?
What would be the motivation for Maharishi go get involved with any 
woman, in a secret way?
Both of these things seem so out of character to me;
I just write them off as complete and total nonesense.

As did I for decades. In fact, I still write the murder thing off as total nonsense. I only have evidence (the testimony of two of the women and the accounts of numerous secretaries) for the sex thing.

__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  






__,_._,___





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: MMY : Celibacy and TMO Teachers

2006-08-04 Thread Bhairitu
shempmcgurk wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Vaj wrote:



On Aug 4, 2006, at 5:22 PM, new.morning wrote:

  

Well, since your yogic powers are not sufficient to breaktrough
Sony's superficial protection scheme, here is what S. said:

If people knew the real reason for using a deerskin to 


meditate on,
  

there would be a great shortage of deerskins.



Here's the traditional qualities of a deerskin asana:

It gives special siddhis, liberates from bondage and ensures one 
  

is  
  

never short of money.

Also:

-subjugation of the senses
-sublimation of sensuality
-achieving realization or a state of total awareness
-siddhis
-curing diseases caused by an aggravated mind and piita and 
  

blood  
  

diseases
-increases individual magnetism

Akashic Records, shelf 104890344329.99231

But I have to tell you, it always creeped me out seeing people 
  

who  
  

claimed to be vegetarians sitting on a dead deer hide.
  

The best deer hide is supposed to be black deer.  Since hunting 


deer is 
  

illegal in India I suspect they get the hides from outside the 


country?  
  

One probably could get black deer hides out of Tibet.  The 


taxidermist I 
  

got my deer hide from said there are some black deer in Texas.  


Deer 
  

hides really shed even when properly treated.  I understand that 


is why 
  

antelope hides are frequently used instead.  I also ordered online 


from 
  

a deer farm in Canada but the hides didn't have the proper 


treatment and 
  

really shed too easy.




Try Nauga Hyde.

Doesn't shed.

Nahi nahi.




To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
 shempmcgurk@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
   shempmcgurk@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend 
 jstein@ 
  wrote:
 snip
   The other aspect is purely social and has nothing 
   *whatsoever* to do with the biological aspect.  The 
   social aspect involves the exploitation of an unequal 
   power relationship for selfish purposes and its 
   negative psychological consequences.  As such, 
   of course, it is by no means unique to incestuous 
   relationships. 
  
  Like Bill's relationship to Monica?
 
 Obviously.
 
 Your point was what, exactly?

It wasn't a point, it was a question.
   
   The point of your question was what, exactly?
   
You see, in the English language the ? symbol at the end 
of a 
sentence denotes a question.

As the Author's Friend you should know that without me 
telling 
you.
   
   What I know without you telling me is that you
   weren't asking for information.  There was a point
   you were trying to make *in the guise of* a question.
  
  Well, then, answer the question as posed and then I may decide 
to 
  share the secrets of the universe with you.
 
 As you know, I already did.
 
 Now you answer mine, please.

You're too snarky tonite.  I think I'll let you cool off a bit.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: I Snark, Therefore I Am (feeling better, if not superior)

2006-08-04 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, elastomeric_brotherhood 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
  
   
   On Aug 4, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Peter wrote:
   
--- Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
   
   
On Aug 4, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Peter wrote:
   
  
   
I love these people that talk about something they
have absolutely no experience with. Amazing. I think
I'll post an in-depth critique of Amma' meditation
technique along with my 4 month stay in 1972 with Tat
Walla Baba since I have experienced neither. Off world
will co-author the article with me.
   
   
   Dude, you should let Spairag and Authfriend footnote it just 
to 
 be  
   sure to maintain purity!
  
  Such a feast of snarky  comments! 
  
  Its fun! its a nice release of frustration with stupid or at 
least
  'limited' others. I do it. We all do. 
  
  As if there is 'an other.
  
  Its sort of passive-aggressive.  Or perhaps, if that is not
  technically correct -- its something similar. 
  
  And what is the result? More snarky comments by those snarked. 
And
  what does that lead to? Yes -- you are catching on. Good 
insight. 
  
  Whats the way out of this odd loopy mobius strip of snaky 
insults? 
 Yes
  -- you got it. I always knew *you* were one of the bright ones.
 
 
 Spare the snark, spoil the seeker.


Leave the gun, take the cannoli






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Email I just sent to an old friend who's trying to get me in the dome.

2006-08-04 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ 
   wrote:
   
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
  shempmcgurk@ 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend 
jstein@ 
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk 
shempmcgurk@ 
  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend 
  jstein@ 
   wrote:
  snip
The other aspect is purely social and has nothing 
*whatsoever* to do with the biological aspect.  The 
social aspect involves the exploitation of an unequal 
power relationship for selfish purposes and its 
negative psychological consequences.  As such, 
of course, it is by no means unique to incestuous 
relationships. 
   
   Like Bill's relationship to Monica?
  
  Obviously.
  
  Your point was what, exactly?
 
 It wasn't a point, it was a question.

The point of your question was what, exactly?

 You see, in the English language the ? symbol at the end 
 of a 
 sentence denotes a question.
 
 As the Author's Friend you should know that without me 
 telling 
 you.

What I know without you telling me is that you
weren't asking for information.  There was a point
you were trying to make *in the guise of* a question.
   
   Well, then, answer the question as posed and then I may decide 
 to 
   share the secrets of the universe with you.
  
  As you know, I already did.
  
  Now you answer mine, please.
 
 You're too snarky tonite.  I think I'll let you cool off a bit.

Translation: Shemp *thought* he had a point to
make with his question, then after I answered it,
he realized he'd goofed.  If he said what the
point was, he'd look really, really silly.

He's hoping he'll look *less* silly if he just
blows it off.

Actually, he looks even sillier.  A silly person
trying not to look silly.








To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




<    1   2   3