Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
From: TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com



  
From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

  
I was listening to an interview of a prominent Christian leader in Baghdad who 
fears ISIS is nearing an attack on the city. He has about 32 Iraqi army body 
guards. He asked one , what would he do if he saw ISIS coming at him and the 
soldier said that he would discard his uniform and run. The clergyman asked why 
he was a soldier if he wouldn't do his duty. The soldier replied that he just 
needs the money, a job, inferring there was no sense of duty or patriotism. I'm 
afraid this is typical of the Iraqi army. Wasn't this the norm during the first 
and second Iraq wars?

Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the millions 
-- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have been killed in this 
planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all the killing had just said, 
Fuck this, and gone home. 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Hawking: 'There is no God'

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

 
--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Jedi, 

 The ancient people also had to evolve in order to fully understand who Yahweh 
is.  The Bible chronicles their evolution  of a people who functioned at the 
lower states of consciousness to some unique individuals who attained Unity 
Consciousness.
 

 However, it is unfortunate that most people today are still functioning at the 
lower states of consciousness, or the lower chakras.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be 
in a seemingly endless wars in the world, particularly in the Middle East.
 

 At this time, we're supposed to be in the ascending cycle of the Dwapara Yuga, 
as reckoned by Sri Yukteshwar.  Kali Yuga ended in the 1700s, during the 
European Renaissance.  But many people still have not caught on.
 

 Perhaps, the Age of Aquarius can help people attain the higher states of 
consciousness.  If you live long enough, you might be able to see Sat Yuga, 
during the Age of Leo-- that's about 12,500 years from now.

--- danfriedman2002@... wrote :
 
Yes, the understanding of God has changed in history. 

The Old Testament (to Christians, to Jews it is The Bible or The Book) 
records that Abraham sought to be a good man who served one God well.

Abraham wanted a son his desire was made manifest.

It is written that one day Moses came across a burning bush at Mt Horeb, from 
which he heard God's voice:
I am who I am or I am what I am

The word that God spoke to Moses is Yahweh. The word refers to that which is 
because its essence is to be. I am Totality.

Men have been issuing in The Sat Yuga Now. 


Not at all Dan. What he meant is that, I am what I am, a 
genocidal baby killer and virgin kidnapper.

By the way, read below and weep, more wisdom from your 
beloved Yahweh.

(22:28-29) If a man rapes an unbetrothed virgin, he must pay 
her father 50 shekels of silver and then marry her. 

22:23-24) If a woman is raped in the city and doesn't cry 
out loud enough, the men of the city must stone her to 
death. 

(Tastentier) If she didn't scream because the rapist held a 
knife to her throat, she'd deserve to be stoned to death. 
That's the law of the omnibenevolent god Yahweh, Jesus' 
daddy.

(Ganesh V) Well, Shouldn't The Holy Ghost and Virgin 
Mary be Stoned to death as per this gem from the Holy 
Babble?

(tiny tim) David and Bethsheba technically should have been 
put to death for what they did. David didn't rape her and 
Bethsheba didn't cry out.

22:13-21) If a man marries and then decides that he hates 
his wife, he can claim she wasn't a virgin when they were 
married. If her father can't produce the tokens of her 
virginity, then the woman is to be stoned to death at her 
father's doorstep.



 

--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Salyavin, 

 Your last paragraph sums it adequately.  In a scientific sense, IMO John 
Hagelin's idea of an ocean of superstrings is the basis of everything, 
including the multiverse and our universe.  It is the unified field and it is 
present in the dark energy that's powering the expansion of the universe.
 

 This ocean is alive and aware.  It is the Self of the vedic literature.  It is 
the self in you and in other people.  It is Yahweh in the Judeo-Christian 
literature.

--- jedi_spock@... wrote :

Interesting. Is it the same Yahweh who ordered Moses to 
slaughter women, children, babies, elders, of his wife's 
country and kidnap 32,000 virgins belonging to another 
culture.

Yahweh was originaly the partisan god of war, along with 
many other gods. It got upgraded centuries later.

Judeo-christian religions come under 'monotheistic dualism'. 
They have nothing to do with 'solipsistic non-dualism' of 
Maharishi and Adi Shankara.


 

 As a matter of fact, consciousness is present in the rocks, plants and 
animals.   As such, everything in the universe intrinsically has the capacity 
to experience the various states of consciousness.  However, the degree of 
awareness is fully endowed in the mind and physiology of the human being.

IMO, the various states of consciousness are the higher dimensions that the 
scientists have been looking for at CERN.  IOW,  the higher dimensions are not 
hidden or curled up within space-time.  The higher dimensions are intrinsically 
present within space-time. 

These higher dimensions are unfolded as matter becomes more complex.  Thus, it 
is only in the human mind and physiology that Unity Consciousness can be 
experienced.   IMO, this is the true message that all of the world's religions 
are trying to say.

But, unfortunately, many people are still hung up on matter and instincts-- 
from which fundamentalism is derived-- which is causing suffering and death in 
the world today.



 
--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Richard, 

 Excellent observation.  I concur.
 

 Erm, but he doesn't answer the question, he's just cut and pasting his usual 
response every time some mentions the C word. It isn't relevant, what are you 
concuring with?
 

 The question was: Ask yourself where consciousness came from. Chaos? 

[FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo images 
to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer makes his 
point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different ethnic 
groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the imprint of 
years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project onto the 
person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 


I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés photos are 
below in the HuffPo article, others at the link under his name. 


'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes

  
 
'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot...
Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...  
View on www.huffingtonpost... Preview by Yahoo  

[FairfieldLife] Re: Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]



No, these people are willing to lose everything they have 
including their women and families, to attack the rest of 
the world. They are from a completely different moral order.

They look at women as properties to be owned. Their motives 
are irrational and illogical. Their use of fraudulent religions 
is just an excuse, a smoke screen to hide their real agenda, 
which is to spread their genes, all over the world.

Their real agenda is biological, always remember that.

 
--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Osho said that wars are caused by sexual repression.  IOW, if the ISIS 
militants had girlfriends, they wouldn't go to war.
 

 ---Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote : 
 I was listening to an interview of a prominent Christian leader in Baghdad who 
fears ISIS is nearing an attack on the city. He has about 32 Iraqi army body 
guards. He asked one , what would he do if he saw ISIS coming at him and the 
soldier said that he would discard his uniform and run. The clergyman asked why 
he was a soldier if he wouldn't do his duty. The soldier replied that he just 
needs the money, a job, inferring there was no sense of duty or patriotism. I'm 
afraid this is typical of the Iraqi army. Wasn't this the norm during the first 
and second Iraq wars?
 
--- turquoiseb@... wrote :

 







Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the millions 
-- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have been killed in this 
planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all the killing had just said, 
Fuck this, and gone home. 







 









[FairfieldLife] The Incredible Journey of Inspiration - Swami Narayan

2014-10-02 Thread nablusoss1008
Mystic India - The Incredible Journey of Inspiration [DDR]- Swami Narayan 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OuKvQf_apE
 
 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OuKvQf_apE 
 
 Mystic India - The Incredible Journey of Inspiration [DD... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OuKvQf_apE (Learn and portray India with a 
collection of free online documentary films on http://www.bharatchitra.com ) 
Swaminarayan (or Swami Narayan) is ...
 
 
 
 View on www.youtube.com https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OuKvQf_apE 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  


[FairfieldLife] A Charlie Lutes audio for John Y and others

2014-10-02 Thread mail_uzer
The Highest Teaching is Transcendental Meditation as taught by certified 
teachers. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7KtIeNsH8list=PLty-nUj7w26oQPy7rubDw1ZcHLL98T8fqindex=10
 
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7KtIeNsH8list=PLty-nUj7w26oQPy7rubDw1ZcHLL98T8fqindex=10
 
 
 The Highest Teaching is Transcendental Meditation ... 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7KtIeNsH8list=PLty-nUj7w26oQPy7rubDw1ZcHLL98T8fqindex=10
 It's not enough to be given the highest teaching on Earth. What do we do with 
it? Persevere. Morning and Evening, twice a day devotion to our meditation as 
w...
 
 
 
 View on www.youtube.com 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm7KtIeNsH8list=PLty-nUj7w26oQPy7rubDw1ZcHLL98T8fqindex=10
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  


Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
From: TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com



  
I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo images 
to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer makes his 
point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different ethnic 
groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the imprint of 
years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project onto the 
person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 


I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés photos are 
below in the HuffPo article, others at the link under his name. 

 

'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes

  
 
'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot...
Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...  
View on www.huffingtonpost... Preview by Yahoo  
  
 

Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:

Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:51 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     From: TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

    I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo 
images to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer 
makes his point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different 
ethnic groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the 
imprint of years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project 
onto the person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés photos are 
below in the HuffPo article, others at the link under his name. 
  
'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot...Terrorist. 
Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as stereotypes, they're 
labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. P... |
|  |
| View on www.huffingtonpost... | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

 

Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:

















 #yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617 -- #yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv9108846617 
#yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv9108846617 
#yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp #yiv9108846617hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp #yiv9108846617ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp .yiv9108846617ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp .yiv9108846617ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617ygrp-mkp .yiv9108846617ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv9108846617ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv9108846617 
#yiv9108846617ygrp-sponsor #yiv9108846617ygrp-lc #yiv9108846617hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv9108846617 
#yiv9108846617ygrp-sponsor #yiv9108846617ygrp-lc .yiv9108846617ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv9108846617 
#yiv9108846617activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv9108846617
 #yiv9108846617activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv9108846617 
#yiv9108846617activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv9108846617 #yiv9108846617activity span 
.yiv9108846617underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv9108846617 
.yiv9108846617attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv9108846617 .yiv9108846617attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9108846617 .yiv9108846617attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv9108846617 .yiv9108846617attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv9108846617 .yiv9108846617attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv9108846617 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv9108846617 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
If they really want to spread their genes all over the world, they might first 
get rid of the thought that women are property. Having 2 such thoughts must 
produce a lot of cognitive dissonance! 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 4:17 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


No, these people are willing to lose everything they have 
including their women and families, to attack the rest of 
the world. They are from a completely different moral order.

They look at women as properties to be owned. Their motives 
are irrational and illogical. Their use of fraudulent religions 
is just an excuse, a smoke screen to hide their real agenda, 
which is to spread their genes, all over the world.

Their real agenda is biological, always remember that.


--- jr_esq@... wrote :

Osho said that wars are caused by sexual repression.  IOW, if the ISIS 
militants had girlfriends, they wouldn't go to war.


---Mike Dixon mdixon.6569@... wrote :
I was listening to an interview of a prominent Christian leader in Baghdad who 
fears ISIS is nearing an attack on the city. He has about 32 Iraqi army body 
guards. He asked one , what would he do if he saw ISIS coming at him and the 
soldier said that he would discard his uniform and run. The clergyman asked why 
he was a soldier if he wouldn't do his duty. The soldier replied that he just 
needs the money, a job, inferring there was no sense of duty or patriotism. I'm 
afraid this is typical of the Iraqiarmy. Wasn't this the norm during the first 
and second Iraqwars?
--- turquoiseb@... wrote :

Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the millions 
-- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have been killed in this 
planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all the killing had just said, 
Fuck this, and gone home. 




  #yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899 -- #yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv6447362899 
#yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv6447362899 
#yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp #yiv6447362899hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp #yiv6447362899ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp .yiv6447362899ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp .yiv6447362899ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899ygrp-mkp .yiv6447362899ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv6447362899ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv6447362899 
#yiv6447362899ygrp-sponsor #yiv6447362899ygrp-lc #yiv6447362899hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv6447362899 
#yiv6447362899ygrp-sponsor #yiv6447362899ygrp-lc .yiv6447362899ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv6447362899 
#yiv6447362899activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv6447362899
 #yiv6447362899activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv6447362899 
#yiv6447362899activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv6447362899 #yiv6447362899activity span 
.yiv6447362899underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv6447362899 
.yiv6447362899attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv6447362899 .yiv6447362899attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 .yiv6447362899attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv6447362899 .yiv6447362899attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv6447362899 .yiv6447362899attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv6447362899 .yiv6447362899bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv6447362899 
.yiv6447362899bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 dd.yiv6447362899last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6447362899 dd.yiv6447362899last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv6447362899 
dd.yiv6447362899last p span.yiv6447362899yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv6447362899 div.yiv6447362899attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 div.yiv6447362899attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv6447362899 div.yiv6447362899file-title a, #yiv6447362899 
div.yiv6447362899file-title a:active, #yiv6447362899 
div.yiv6447362899file-title a:hover, #yiv6447362899 div.yiv6447362899file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 div.yiv6447362899photo-title a, 
#yiv6447362899 div.yiv6447362899photo-title a:active, #yiv6447362899 
div.yiv6447362899photo-title a:hover, #yiv6447362899 
div.yiv6447362899photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv6447362899 
div#yiv6447362899ygrp-mlmsg 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Try an ounce of self reflection, Barry. 

 You, who insult.  Who says your primary purpose is to push people's buttons
 

 I guess you miss the fact that people may not regard you as some kind of BFF.
 

 Try posting something with out the usual rejoinder on occasion.  (if you can)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo images 
to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer makes his 
point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different ethnic 
groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the imprint of 
years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project onto the 
person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés 
http://www.joelpares.com/ photos are below in the HuffPo article, others at the 
link under his name. 

 

 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 

  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
  
  
  
  
  
 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  






Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Not sure what you are saying below Barry.  Likely the usual basket of insults, 
mocking etc. 

 But, what you probably miss, is that if your beliefs pretty much check all the 
boxes for being a classic theist.
 

 Now, I know that goes against the meme you have of yourself as Barry Wright, 
hipster, renegade, rebel with an anti TM cause, but thems the facts.  
 

 Ain't no thang.  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
   I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo 
images to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer 
makes his point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different 
ethnic groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the 
imprint of years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project 
onto the person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés 
http://www.joelpares.com/ photos are below in the HuffPo article, others at the 
link under his name. 

  
 

 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes
 

  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
  
  
  
  
  
 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  








Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:

 















 


 
 
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :

 Not sure what you are saying below Barry.  Likely the usual basket of insults, 
mocking etc. 

 But, what you probably miss, is that  your beliefs pretty much check all the 
boxes for being a classic theist.
 

 Now, I know that goes against the meme you have of yourself as Barry Wright, 
hipster, renegade, rebel with an anti TM cause, but thems the facts.  
 

 Ain't no thang.  


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
   I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo 
images to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer 
makes his point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different 
ethnic groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the 
imprint of years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project 
onto the person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés 
http://www.joelpares.com/ photos are below in the HuffPo article, others at the 
link under his name. 

  
 

 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes
 

  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
  
  
  
  
  
 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  








Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:

 















 


 
 
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :

 Try an ounce of self reflection, Barry. 

 You, who insult.  Who says your primary purpose is to push people's buttons
 

 I guess you miss the fact that people may not regard you as some kind of BFF.
 

 Try posting something with out the usual rejoinder on occasion.  (if you can)
 Barry's sort of self-reflection has resulted in The Contradictory Barry we see 
here.

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo images 
to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer makes his 
point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different ethnic 
groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the imprint of 
years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project onto the 
person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés 
http://www.joelpares.com/ photos are below in the HuffPo article, others at the 
link under his name. 

 

 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 

  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
  
  
  
  
  
 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  








[FairfieldLife] Re: Hawking: 'There is no God'

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jedi_spock@... wrote :

 
 

 
--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Jedi, 

 The ancient people also had to evolve in order to fully understand who Yahweh 
is.  The Bible chronicles their evolution  of a people who functioned at the 
lower states of consciousness to some unique individuals who attained Unity 
Consciousness.
 

 However, it is unfortunate that most people today are still functioning at the 
lower states of consciousness, or the lower chakras.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be 
in a seemingly endless wars in the world, particularly in the Middle East.
 

 At this time, we're supposed to be in the ascending cycle of the Dwapara Yuga, 
as reckoned by Sri Yukteshwar.  Kali Yuga ended in the 1700s, during the 
European Renaissance.  But many people still have not caught on.
 

 Perhaps, the Age of Aquarius can help people attain the higher states of 
consciousness.  If you live long enough, you might be able to see Sat Yuga, 
during the Age of Leo-- that's about 12,500 years from now.

--- danfriedman2002@... wrote :
 
Yes, the understanding of God has changed in history. 

The Old Testament (to Christians, to Jews it is The Bible or The Book) 
records that Abraham sought to be a good man who served one God well.

Abraham wanted a son his desire was made manifest.

It is written that one day Moses came across a burning bush at Mt Horeb, from 
which he heard God's voice:
I am who I am or I am what I am

The word that God spoke to Moses is Yahweh. The word refers to that which is 
because its essence is to be. I am Totality.

Men have been issuing in The Sat Yuga Now. 


Not at all Dan. How dare you! What he meant How dare you! is that, I am what I 
am, a 
genocidal baby killer and virgin kidnapper.

By the way, read below and weep, I weep for you! more wisdom from your 
beloved Yahweh.

(22:28-29) If a man rapes an unbetrothed virgin, he must pay 
her father 50 shekels of silver and then marry her. 

22:23-24) If a woman is raped in the city and doesn't cry 
out loud enough, the men of the city must stone her to 
death. 

(Tastentier) If she didn't scream because the rapist held a 
knife to her throat, she'd deserve to be stoned to death. 
That's the law of the omnibenevolent god Yahweh, Jesus' 
daddy.

(Ganesh V) Well, Shouldn't The Holy Ghost and Virgin 
Mary be Stoned to death as per this gem from the Holy 
Babble?

(tiny tim) David and Bethsheba technically should have been 
put to death for what they did. David didn't rape her and 
Bethsheba didn't cry out.

22:13-21) If a man marries and then decides that he hates 
his wife, he can claim she wasn't a virgin when they were 
married. If her father can't produce the tokens of her 
virginity, then the woman is to be stoned to death at her 
father's doorstep.

Try to move on from your barbarism hater!

 

--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Salyavin, 

 Your last paragraph sums it adequately.  In a scientific sense, IMO John 
Hagelin's idea of an ocean of superstrings is the basis of everything, 
including the multiverse and our universe.  It is the unified field and it is 
present in the dark energy that's powering the expansion of the universe.
 

 This ocean is alive and aware.  It is the Self of the vedic literature.  It is 
the self in you and in other people.  It is Yahweh in the Judeo-Christian 
literature.

--- jedi_spock@... wrote :

Interesting. Is it the same Yahweh who ordered Moses to 
slaughter women, children, babies, elders, of his wife's 
country and kidnap 32,000 virgins belonging to another 
culture.

Yahweh was originaly the partisan god of war, along with 
many other gods. It got upgraded centuries later.

Judeo-christian religions come under 'monotheistic dualism'. 
They have nothing to do with 'solipsistic non-dualism' of 
Maharishi and Adi Shankara.


 

 As a matter of fact, consciousness is present in the rocks, plants and 
animals.   As such, everything in the universe intrinsically has the capacity 
to experience the various states of consciousness.  However, the degree of 
awareness is fully endowed in the mind and physiology of the human being.

IMO, the various states of consciousness are the higher dimensions that the 
scientists have been looking for at CERN.  IOW,  the higher dimensions are not 
hidden or curled up within space-time.  The higher dimensions are intrinsically 
present within space-time. 

These higher dimensions are unfolded as matter becomes more complex.  Thus, it 
is only in the human mind and physiology that Unity Consciousness can be 
experienced.   IMO, this is the true message that all of the world's religions 
are trying to say.

But, unfortunately, many people are still hung up on matter and instincts-- 
from which fundamentalism is derived-- which is causing suffering and death in 
the world today.



 
--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Richard, 

 Excellent observation.  I concur.
 

 Erm, but he doesn't answer the question, he's just cut and pasting his usual 
response every time 

[FairfieldLife] The Seven Wonders of the World

2014-10-02 Thread TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
This is one of those New Age graphics that multiply like rabbits on Facebook. 
But for once I kinda liked this one. One reason is the Thoreau-like simplicity 
of the list. It's just spot-on. Another reason is that to fly and to be 
enlightened didn't make the list. That's having yer priorities in order IMO. 

Re: [FairfieldLife] JFAN Annual Meeting [2 Attachments]

2014-10-02 Thread Michael Jackson mjackso...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Nine new CAFO's in Jefferson County alone!? That don't sound too good for the 
quality of life in Jefferson.




 From: 'Rick Archer' r...@searchsummit.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com; 
fairfieldc...@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 11:03 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] JFAN Annual Meeting
 


  
From: Diane Rosenberg j...@lisco.com
Date: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 at 6:36 PM
To: Diane Rosenberg j...@lisco.com
Subject: In Just Two Weeks...
 
We are fighting for what we really want, not just the best that can be 
negotiated in Washington- Wenonah Hauter

WENONAH HAUTER
CHARLIE SPEER  RICHARD MIDDLETON

It's Time To Change 'Business As Usual'

Jefferson County Farmers  Neighbors, Inc. Annual Meeting

Wednesday, October 15 at 7:30 pm
Fairfield Arts  Convention Center

WENONAH HAUTER

*Food  Water Watch Executive Director
* Leading national food and farm activist
* Author of Foodopoly: The Battle Over the Future of Food and Farming in America
*25+ years advocating for food, water, and energy issues

Iowa is overrun with hog confinements. Wenonah Hauter will speak on the 
enormous influence agribusiness has on developing US agricultural policies that 
overwhelmingly favor industrial livestock production. Fair? Heck no. Hauter 
will address what Iowans must do to reverse this situation, transforming 
business as usual into a fair, sustainable system - business that benefits 
all.

Plus Nationally Renowned Environmental Attorneys Return

CHARLIE SPEER · RICHARD MIDDLETON

*Award-winning environmental litigators
* Winners of multi-million dollar verdicts and settlements against CAFO owners 
and their integrators (corporate suppliers)
* 15+ years representing clients harmed by nearby CAFOs

Nine new CAFOs are under construction in Jefferson County, and Southeast Iowa 
is hit with many more. Charlie Speer, Richard Middleton, and David E. Sykes - 
JFAN's new president - will present an important report on this serious threat. 
Find out why the numbers of CAFOs aren't higher in Jefferson County and what is 
being done to deter additional development in the area.

Dr. John Ikerd, renowned agricultural economist and JFAN Board Member emcees 
the meeting.

We thank our community partners Leopold Group Sierra Club, solar Powered KRUU 
100.1 FM, Little Village Magazine and Radish Magazine for co-sponsoring this 
event.

Admission is free, however a donation of $5 is welcome to support JFAN's 
mission. 

Thank you to all our corporate sponsors
Aeron Lifestyle Technology · Blue Fish · Bob and Kay Ferguson Shaklee 
Distributors · Centerpoint Investment Strategies · David E. Sykes, PC · 
Fairfield Accounting Services · Global ID Group · Green Building Supply · Green 
Gourmet · Leopold Group Sierra Club · Maharishi Ayurveda Products International 
· The Organic and Non-GMO Report · Radiance Dairy · Radiant Health Imaging · 
The Raj · Socially Responsible Agricultural Project · Tim Hawthorne and Laya 
Schaetzel-Hawthorne 

 
 
To be added to the JFAN email list, type SUBSCRIBE in the Subject Line and hit 
return. To unsubscribe from the JFAN email list, hit reply, type REMOVE in the 
Subject Line and hit return. JFAN never sells or shares its email list. Thank 
you!

Jefferson County Farmers  Neighbors, Inc.
PO Box 811
Fairfield, IA 52556
www.jfaniowa.org
641-209-6600 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
Dearest Share,

May your words serve as a guiding light for all who hear.

My observance: 
Yom Kippur (Hebrew: יוֹם כִּפּוּר or יום הכיפורים), Also known as Day of 
Atonement, is the holiest day of the year for the Jews. Its central themes are 
atonement and repentance. Yom Kippur completes the annual period known in 
Judaism as the High Holy Days (or sometimes the Days of Awe).
 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:51 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   
 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
   I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo 
images to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer 
makes his point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different 
ethnic groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the 
imprint of years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project 
onto the person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés 
http://www.joelpares.com/ photos are below in the HuffPo article, others at the 
link under his name. 

  
 

 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes
 

  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
  
  
  
  
  
 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  








Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:

 















 






 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Pure Genius! 
 Next: Turq describes, for quite awhile, How The Universe Does, Or Does Not 
Exist, Ever (Especially if you are a cultist TMer, and Maharishi is a poopy 
pants). 
 This 12 volume set is also available as a books-on-tape option, and has been 
known to put entire small  
countries to sleep, rapidly, when broadcast nationally. 
 Use your special FFL code: L3NZ 5Uxx for a generous 5% discount!
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :

 Really?

Always productive.

Never missus a trick.

Turq for Ruler!
 

 The last of the complex thinkers.
 Turq's contradictions are so complex that it boggles the mind to imagine the 
labyrinth of memory/fantasy/imaginings/projections/beliefs...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
 
 Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the millions 
-- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have been killed in this 
planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all the killing had just said, 
Fuck this, and gone home. 


























Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Link to the invitation for Nov 30th

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]


/By my count, based on his online posted biography, Barry has spent 
thousands of dollars and decades of time working to promote or debunk 
various spiritual groups and individuals. At one point he was 
apparently a group leader of some repute and well known in cult 
circles around Portland, Oregon and Sante Fe, NM. His photo was once 
featured on the front page of a TMO publication about Governors of 
the Age of Enlightenment //and he has written a book about witnessing 
the Zen Master Rama levitate. Go figure.

//
//At some point he became a True Believer but then later, he got 
turned and did a 180 and went over to being anti-cult, probably 
working as a reporter for CAN.//


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cult_Awareness_Network
//
//We are not sure exactly how time he spent or how much money he was 
able to skim, or what happened to all the money. He doesn't seem to 
want to talk about it, probably due to the extreme cognitive 
dissonance. //Whatever, //it may make a good article for a science or 
psychology magazine article on trance-induction states and mind-control. /

/
/On 10/1/2014 9:43 AM, danfriedman2002 wrote:



Does my wild-ass guess that Judy is penning such article hold water?

You all know her better than I, but I got the sense that her logical 
approach was meant to help Turq contain his wildness.


/Yes - I think she did try to help him - she did her part trying to keep 
the discussion going. /




Am I right about this?


/Anyone can pose here as anything they want to pretend to be - by their 
words we shall know them. Sometimes though, when people pose as 
athiests they leave out the most interesting aspects of the spiritual 
quest - it's more like a thought-stopper than a discussion statement. 
The problem in a discussion is *elitism* - projecting an image based on 
class and privilage. And, some people want to take over your mind and 
make you doubt yourself.


Everyone believes in something. Sam Harris studied and practiced Tantric 
Buddhism under a Tibetan lama. Go figure.


Just think - the words you post to the internet are as close to immortal 
as most people will ever get, not counting their gravestone. ///Or, at 
least until the Yahoo server goes down. Y/ou get much more fame here 
than with Warhol's fifteen minutes. /




Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Pure Genius! 
 Next: Turq describes, for quite awhile, How The Universe Does, Or Does Not 
Exist, Ever (Especially if you are a cultist TMer, and Maharishi is a poopy 
pants). 
 This 12 volume set is also available as a books-on-tape option, and has been 
known to put entire small  
countries to sleep, rapidly, when broadcast nationally. 
 Use your special FFL code: L3NZ 5Uxx for a generous 5% discount!
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, steve.sundur@... wrote :

 Really?

Always productive.

Never missus a trick.

Turq for Ruler!
 

 The last of the complex thinkers.
 
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
 
 Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the millions 
-- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have been killed in this 
planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all the killing had just said, 
Fuck this, and gone home. 


























[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :


 bawee dribbles:
 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. 
 

 all the while not realizing he continues to talk about himself in reference to 
others. The irony just never stops.





[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
I should also add that the criteria for being included in the studies that Fred 
did was having witnessing sleep for a year. 

 THere were several people interviewed who responded in a way that suggested to 
me (and to Fred also, from what he has said) that they were in GC or UC, but 
there weren't enough people in each possible sub-group (CC/GC/UC) to do a 
detailed analysis of what the physiological correlates were for each category 
of enlightened response to the interviewer's request to Describe your self. 
Here's examples of the various kinds of responses that Fred got. Does it seem 
like anyone might be in GC or UC rather than CC?
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 


 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 But CC really isn't enlightenment, it's just 'glorified ignorance' as M said. 
You get inner wakefulness and silence along with a deluded mind. So this paper 
is not about enlightened people. It's about people who have a certain degree of 
opening to spiritual experience, but far short of the goal. Fred's problem is 
he does not have access to currently used state-of-the-art equipment in the 
study of consciousness, and even if he did, he probably would not be allowed by 
the TMO to use it (fMRI for example), and he is probably under some other 
research restrictions as well, as he likely would be booted if he published any 
negative results. 

 Fred: 'The experience of Transcendental Consciousness transcends language and 
provides a platform for experiencing the world more with re[s]pect to inner 
abstract structures and less with respect to outer, changing concrete objects. 
This experience of Transcendental Consciousness is not a luxury and should not 
be isolated to a few individuals transcending during meditation practice. 
Rather, the experience of Transcendental Consciousness should be available to 
everyone to allow them to realize their full human birthright.'
 

 He did not even mention CC in his conclusion (above) either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 Fred Travis published research on enlightened people. 

 This review paper looks at the research:
 

 Transcendental experiences during meditation practice - Travis - 2013 - Annals 
of the New York Academy of Sciences - Wiley Online Library 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 
 
 Transcendental experiences during meditation practice - Travis - 2013 - Annals 
of the New Yor... http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 1 
Shear, J. 2006. The Experience of Meditation: Experts Introduce the Major 
Traditions. Princeton, NJ: The Infinity Foundation. 2 Travis, F.  J. Shear.


 
 View on onlinelibrary.wiley.com 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 

 Fred is doing new research on people in CC and will be using more 
sophisticated EEG analysis, and possibly other measures as well.
 

 

 L
 

 






  




[FairfieldLife] Re: Hawking: 'There is no God'

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 



 
 

 jedi_spock@... wrote :

 
 

 
--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Jedi, 

 The ancient people also had to evolve in order to fully understand who Yahweh 
is.  The Bible chronicles their evolution  of a people who functioned at the 
lower states of consciousness to some unique individuals who attained Unity 
Consciousness.
 

 However, it is unfortunate that most people today are still functioning at the 
lower states of consciousness, or the lower chakras.  Otherwise, we wouldn't be 
in a seemingly endless wars in the world, particularly in the Middle East.
 

 At this time, we're supposed to be in the ascending cycle of the Dwapara Yuga, 
as reckoned by Sri Yukteshwar.  Kali Yuga ended in the 1700s, during the 
European Renaissance.  But many people still have not caught on.
 

 Perhaps, the Age of Aquarius can help people attain the higher states of 
consciousness.  If you live long enough, you might be able to see Sat Yuga, 
during the Age of Leo-- that's about 12,500 years from now.

--- danfriedman2002@... wrote :
 
Yes, the understanding of God has changed in history. 

The Old Testament (to Christians, to Jews it is The Bible or The Book) 
records that Abraham sought to be a good man who served one God well.

Abraham wanted a son his desire was made manifest.

It is written that one day Moses came across a burning bush at Mt Horeb, from 
which he heard God's voice:
I am who I am or I am what I am

The word that God spoke to Moses is Yahweh. The word refers to that which is 
because its essence is to be. I am Totality.

Men have been issuing in The Sat Yuga Now. 


Not at all Dan. How dare you! What he meant How dare you! 

Hey, Danny boy. Are you upset? 

Please draw a line of distinction between this fraudulent 
religion and Vedanta. Sure, there is some good philosophy in 
new testament, but 90% of it is fraudulent shit.

Here are a few gems from that huge pile of shit.

And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, 
shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus. 
(Philippians 4:7)

And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you 
free. (John 8:32)



is that, I am what I am, a genocidal baby killer and virgin kidnapper.

By the way, read below and weep, I weep for you! more wisdom from your 
beloved Yahweh.

(22:28-29) If a man rapes an unbetrothed virgin, he must pay 
her father 50 shekels of silver and then marry her. 

22:23-24) If a woman is raped in the city and doesn't cry 
out loud enough, the men of the city must stone her to 
death. 

(Tastentier) If she didn't scream because the rapist held a 
knife to her throat, she'd deserve to be stoned to death. 
That's the law of the omnibenevolent god Yahweh, Jesus' 
daddy.

(Ganesh V) Well, Shouldn't The Holy Ghost and Virgin 
Mary be Stoned to death as per this gem from the Holy 
Babble?

(tiny tim) David and Bethsheba technically should have been 
put to death for what they did. David didn't rape her and 
Bethsheba didn't cry out.

22:13-21) If a man marries and then decides that he hates 
his wife, he can claim she wasn't a virgin when they were 
married. If her father can't produce the tokens of her 
virginity, then the woman is to be stoned to death at her 
father's doorstep.

Try to move on from your barbarism hater!

 

--- jr_esq@... wrote :

 Salyavin, 

 Your last paragraph sums it adequately.  In a scientific sense, IMO John 
Hagelin's idea of an ocean of superstrings is the basis of everything, 
including the multiverse and our universe.  It is the unified field and it is 
present in the dark energy that's powering the expansion of the universe.
 

 This ocean is alive and aware.  It is the Self of the vedic literature.  It is 
the self in you and in other people.  It is Yahweh in the Judeo-Christian 
literature.

--- jedi_spock@... wrote :

Interesting. Is it the same Yahweh who ordered Moses to 
slaughter women, children, babies, elders, of his wife's 
country and kidnap 32,000 virgins belonging to another 
culture.

Yahweh was originaly the partisan god of war, along with 
many other gods. It got upgraded centuries later.

Judeo-christian religions come under 'monotheistic dualism'. 
They have nothing to do with 'solipsistic non-dualism' of 
Maharishi and Adi Shankara.


 

 As a matter of fact, consciousness is present in the rocks, plants and 
animals.   As such, everything in the universe intrinsically has the capacity 
to experience the various states of consciousness.  However, the degree of 
awareness is fully endowed in the mind and physiology of the human being.

IMO, the various states of consciousness are the higher dimensions that the 
scientists have been looking for at CERN.  IOW,  the higher dimensions are not 
hidden or curled up within space-time.  The higher dimensions are intrinsically 
present within space-time. 

These higher dimensions are unfolded as matter becomes more complex.  Thus, it 
is only in the human mind and physiology that Unity Consciousness can be 
experienced.   IMO, 

[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]

 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 But CC really isn't enlightenment, it's just 'glorified ignorance' as M said. 
You get inner wakefulness and silence along with a deluded mind. So this paper 
is not about enlightened people. It's about people who have a certain degree of 
opening to spiritual experience, but far short of the goal. Fred's problem is 
he does not have access to currently used state-of-the-art equipment in the 
study of consciousness, and even if he did, he probably would not be allowed by 
the TMO to use it (fMRI for example), and he is probably under some other 
research restrictions as well, as he likely would be booted if he published any 
negative results. 

 Fred: 'The experience of Transcendental Consciousness transcends language and 
provides a platform for experiencing the world more with re[s]pect to inner 
abstract structures and less with respect to outer, changing concrete objects. 
This experience of Transcendental Consciousness is not a luxury and should not 
be isolated to a few individuals transcending during meditation practice. 
Rather, the experience of Transcendental Consciousness should be available to 
everyone to allow them to realize their full human birthright.'
 

 He did not even mention CC in his conclusion (above) either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 Fred Travis published research on enlightened people. 

 This review paper looks at the research:
 

 Transcendental experiences during meditation practice - Travis - 2013 - Annals 
of the New York Academy of Sciences - Wiley Online Library 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 
 
 Transcendental experiences during meditation practice - Travis - 2013 - Annals 
of the New Yor... http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 1 
Shear, J. 2006. The Experience of Meditation: Experts Introduce the Major 
Traditions. Princeton, NJ: The Infinity Foundation. 2 Travis, F.  J. Shear.


 
 View on onlinelibrary.wiley.com 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 

 Fred is doing new research on people in CC and will be using more 
sophisticated EEG analysis, and possibly other measures as well.
 

 

 L
 

 






  


  


Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 







Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

Fascinating for you maybe. For me I don't separate the world into God believers 
and non God believers - that would be far too tiresome and closed-minded. And I 
certainly don't spend time worrying about who believes what when it comes to 
religion or gods or the Easter Bunny for that matter. One day, bawee, you might 
try giving yourself a break and just letting it go; stop worrying about 
changing or even critiquing upon what others believe or don't believe. You get 
yourself so het up about it I am surprised you havent' had a stroke (or maybe 
you have). Now you speak below about others trying to convert people to believe 
in God. Isn't your point of this little post to try and convert the believers 
into non-believers or at least to denigrate their beliefs? Of course it is, you 
silly man. The little poster below featuring the babies as atheists was funny 
though.
 
The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:
 

 

 





 


 
 
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 But CC really isn't enlightenment, it's just 'glorified ignorance' as M said. 
You get inner wakefulness and silence along with a deluded mind. So this paper 
is not about enlightened people. It's about people who have a certain degree of 
opening to spiritual experience, but far short of the goal. Fred's problem is 
he does not have access to currently used state-of-the-art equipment in the 
study of consciousness, and even if he did, he probably would not be allowed by 
the TMO to use it (fMRI for example), and he is probably under some other 
research restrictions as well, as he likely would be booted if he published any 
negative results. 

 Fred: 'The experience of Transcendental Consciousness transcends language and 
provides a platform for experiencing the world more with re[s]pect to inner 
abstract structures and less with respect to outer, changing concrete objects. 
This experience of Transcendental Consciousness is not a luxury and should not 
be isolated to a few individuals transcending during meditation practice. 
Rather, the experience of Transcendental Consciousness should be available to 
everyone to allow them to realize their full human birthright.'
 

 He did not even mention CC in his conclusion (above) either.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 Fred Travis published research on enlightened people. 

 This review paper looks at the research:
 

 Transcendental experiences during meditation practice - Travis - 2013 - Annals 
of the New York Academy of Sciences - Wiley Online Library 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 
 
 Transcendental experiences during meditation practice - Travis - 2013 - Annals 
of the New Yor... http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full 1 
Shear, J. 2006. The Experience of Meditation: Experts Introduce the Major 
Traditions. Princeton, NJ: The Infinity Foundation. 2 Travis, F.  J. Shear.


 
 View on onlinelibrary.wiley.com 
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10./nyas.12316/full
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

  

 

 Fred is doing new research on people in CC and will be using more 
sophisticated EEG analysis, and possibly other measures as well.
 

 

 L
 

 






  


  




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
From: lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:23 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris
 


  
I should also add that the criteria for being included in the studies that Fred 
did was having witnessing sleep for a year.
And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean shit. 

One of my science article clients runs a sleep clinic, so when writing articles 
about sleep disorders I've learned a few interesting things. Such as that there 
is a subset of patients who complain that they Never fall asleep. Their 
subjective experience is that they never lose conscious awareness, so they're 
worried that they've got a sleep disorder, even though they display no symptoms 
of sleep deprivation. 

When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology during sleep, these 
folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic cycles of sleep, along 
with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity. It's just that they never 
lose their subjective awareness. In other words, a part of them is always 
awake, witnessing their subjective experience as they navigate the entire range 
of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. 

In the decade my client's practice has been open, he has treated maybe a couple 
of dozen people who report this. All of them are just normal people off the 
street. Not one of them meditates. 

Go figure.  

Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 







Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

Fascinating for you maybe. For me I don't separate the world into God believers 
and non God believers - that would be far too tiresome and closed-minded. And I 
certainly don't spend time worrying about who believes what when it comes to 
religion or gods or the Easter Bunny for that matter. One day, bawee, you might 
try giving yourself a break and just letting it go; stop worrying about 
changing or even critiquing upon what others believe or don't believe. You get 
yourself so het up about it I am surprised you havent' had a stroke (or maybe 
you have). Now you speak below about others trying to convert people to believe 
in God. Isn't your point of this little post to try and convert the believers 
into non-believers or at least to denigrate their beliefs? Of course it is, you 
silly man. The little poster below featuring the babies as atheists was funny 
though.
 
The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:
 

 
And representing the God-lovers, here's a lovely quote that arrived in my inbox 
just now:

QUESTION: Is there one God, or are there many gods? 

 
MAHARISHI: If there are many gods, they must be working together as one God in 
order to keep all ends of the vast, expanding universe functioning in good 
coordination with each other. So we would not mind if there are many gods; we 
would not mind if there is one God. Whether many gods or one God, there 
definitely is the infinite diversity of the ever-expanding universe. 
 
Look to these words: 'infinite diversity of the ever-expanding universe', that 
is being administered by someone or many functioning in good faith with each 
other. It does not matter whether one or many. If someone believes there is 
one, he says, 'You are right; He can be one.' Or if there are many, many also 
will be functioning as one, unified. It is not that one [god] says, 'Yes, I 
will do this,' and the others say, 'No, I cannot do this.' It is not a matter 
of voting. It is a matter of acting in union with each other.
 

One God or many gods, it does not matter. Whether one or many, it does not 
matter. Whatever we like, we can choose. There must be many, many gods to take 
care of many, many galaxies and many, many individuals, yes? There are so many 
species: tigers are there, monkeys are there, elephants are there, men are 
there. And men are living in North Pole and South Pole and here and there and 
there and there. So there must be many, many representations or representatives 
of God if there is one God, or no harm saying all gods. 
 
But all gods are in a perfect unified state.

 That means Unity Consciousness 
is ruling the universe. That is how the universe, with all these varieties and 
differences, is being run all the time in perfect order — all the time in 
perfect order. One God is also right; many gods is also right. 
 


 





 


  








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 10:50 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
The real psychological study should be of the 9-11 Deniers, those 
who just go with the official story in spite of the questions 
surrounding 9-11...


/We are still waiting for any new evidence so we can make up our own 
mind.//What questions do you have?

//
//'Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report'//
//http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842/


Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 
 
 







Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

Fascinating for you maybe. For me I don't separate the world into God believers 
and non God believers - that would be far too tiresome and closed-minded. And I 
certainly don't spend time worrying about who believes what when it comes to 
religion or gods or the Easter Bunny for that matter. One day, bawee, you might 
try giving yourself a break and just letting it go; stop worrying about 
changing or even critiquing upon what others believe or don't believe. You get 
yourself so het up about it I am surprised you havent' had a stroke (or maybe 
you have). Now you speak below about others trying to convert people to believe 
in God. Isn't your point of this little post to try and convert the believers 
into non-believers or at least to denigrate their beliefs? Of course it is, you 
silly man. The little poster below featuring the babies as atheists was funny 
though.
 
The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:
 

 
And representing the God-lovers, here's a lovely quote that arrived in my inbox 
just now:

QUESTION: Is there one God, or are there many gods? 


MAHARISHI: If there are many gods, they must be working together as one God in 
order to keep all ends of the vast, expanding universe functioning in good 
coordination with each other. So we would not mind if there are many gods; we 
would not mind if there is one God. Whether many gods or one God, there 
definitely is the infinite diversity of the ever-expanding universe. 

Look to these words: 'infinite diversity of the ever-expanding universe', that 
is being administered by someone or many functioning in good faith with each 
other. It does not matter whether one or many. If someone believes there is 
one, he says, 'You are right; He can be one.' Or if there are many, many also 
will be functioning as one, unified. It is not that one [god] says, 'Yes, I 
will do this,' and the others say, 'No, I cannot do this.' It is not a matter 
of voting. It is a matter of acting in union with each other.


One God or many gods, it does not matter. Whether one or many, it does not 
matter. Whatever we like, we can choose. There must be many, many gods to take 
care of many, many galaxies and many, many individuals, yes? There are so many 
species: tigers are there, monkeys are there, elephants are there, men are 
there. And men are living in North Pole and South Pole and here and there and 
there and there. So there must be many, many representations or representatives 
of God if there is one God, or no harm saying all gods. 
 
But all gods are in a perfect unified state.

 That means Unity Consciousness 
is ruling the universe. That is how the universe, with all these varieties and 
differences, is being run all the time in perfect order — all the time in 
perfect order. One God is also right; many gods is also right. 
 

 

 Thanks for the quote. You can really feel MMY in this one. I am not sure I 
agree with all of it but that's not the point, is it? The point is that there 
are many ways to view the universe and many of them can be right, all at the 
same time. 
 


 













Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris
 
 
   I should also add that the criteria for being included in the studies that 
Fred did was having witnessing sleep for a year.
 






And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean shit. 

One of my science article clients runs a sleep clinic, so when writing articles 
about sleep disorders I've learned a few interesting things. Such as that there 
is a subset of patients who complain that they Never fall asleep. Their 
subjective experience is that they never lose conscious awareness, so they're 
worried that they've got a sleep disorder, even though they display no symptoms 
of sleep deprivation. 

When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology during sleep, these 
folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic cycles of sleep, along 
with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity. It's just that they never 
lose their subjective awareness. In other words, a part of them is always 
awake, witnessing their subjective experience as they navigate the entire range 
of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. 

In the decade my client's practice has been open, he has treated maybe a couple 
of dozen people who report this. All of them are just normal people off the 
street. Not one of them meditates. 

Go figure.  
 

 And your point is what? Oh wait, there is no point, you were just using the 
witnessing sleep subject to show how stupid TM'ers are. Got it.










Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
I remember one time when the Fred Lenz - Rama guy did that to me, and 
I called him on it. We were on one of our field trips, this time I 
think i the Louvre in Paris -- no guided tours or anything, just 100 
or so Rama students wandering around the galleries, sometimes running 
into him, sometimes not.


/It must cost upwards of $10,000 each to get 100 students from Sante Fe, 
NM or Los Angeles, CA over to Paris France and inside the Louvre to look 
at some paintings. Not to mention the cost of putting Rama up at the 
Ritz -15 pl. Vendôme for a few days. Go figure./


[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  


  






[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]



Yeah he does. That Rama Lenz is a piece of shit, whom I 
wouldn't have given five minutes of my time. The fact that 
he got screwed the shit out, by that conman is rankling deep 
inside him.

Bariatric pretends to be detached, but the fact is, Jim and 
Lawson drive him crazy. His hatred for Judy is so great that 
he reads every single post of hers.

By the way, here is Kali Barbie.


http://www.vancouverdesi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/kali.jpg 
http://www.vancouverdesi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/kali.jpg 
 
 http://www.vancouverdesi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/kali.jpg 
 
 http://www.vancouverdesi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09... 
http://www.vancouverdesi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/kali.jpg 
 
 
 View on www.vancouverdesi.com 
http://www.vancouverdesi.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/kali.jpg 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

 
--- steve.sundur@... wrote :

 Not sure what you are saying below Barry.  Likely the usual basket of insults, 
mocking etc. 

 But, what you probably miss, is that  your beliefs pretty much check all the 
boxes for being a classic theist.
 

 Now, I know that goes against the meme you have of yourself as Barry Wright, 
hipster, renegade, rebel with an anti TM cause, but thems the facts.  
 

 Ain't no thang.  


--- turquoiseb@... wrote :

   I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo 
images to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer 
makes his point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different 
ethnic groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the 
imprint of years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project 
onto the person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

 

 I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés 
http://www.joelpares.com/ photos are below in the HuffPo article, others at the 
link under his name. 

  
 

 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereotypes
 

  
  
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
  
  
  
  
  
 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Terrorist. Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as 
stereotypes, they're labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or 
sexual orientation. P...


 
 View on www.huffingtonpost... 
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/30/judging-america-photo-series_n_5907966.html
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  








Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:

 















 


 
 
 






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 On 10/1/2014 10:50 AM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

 The real psychological study should be of the 9-11 Deniers, those who just 
go with the official story in spite of the questions surrounding 9-11... 
 We are still waiting for any new evidence so we can make up our own mind. What 
questions do you have?
 
 'Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report'
 Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report 
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842 
 
 http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842 
 
 Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report 
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842 Popular 
Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts to refute the most 
persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.
 
 
 
 View on www.popularmechan... 
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 


Simpler still,

I was there. Police and firefighters reported exactly what I saw. 

Everyone in the area agreed. That is stronger confirmation than any commentator 
removed by distance and time who used their analysis and imagination.

I gotta believe my lying eyes and those of the thousands of people who shared 
that experience with me.

Bhairitu, in this case I'm thinking that you just may have seen one too many 
movies about all this. 

Stick with What You Know to Be True.
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris
 
 
   I should also add that the criteria for being included in the studies that 
Fred did was having witnessing sleep for a year.
 






And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean shit. 

One of my science article clients runs a sleep clinic, so when writing articles 
about sleep disorders I've learned a few interesting things. Such as that there 
is a subset of patients who complain that they Never fall asleep. Their 
subjective experience is that they never lose conscious awareness, so they're 
worried that they've got a sleep disorder, even though they display no symptoms 
of sleep deprivation. 

When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology during sleep, these 
folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic cycles of sleep, along 
with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity. It's just that they never 
lose their subjective awareness. In other words, a part of them is always 
awake, witnessing their subjective experience as they navigate the entire range 
of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. 

In the decade my client's practice has been open, he has treated maybe a couple 
of dozen people who report this. All of them are just normal people off the 
street. Not one of them meditates. 

Go figure.  
 

 And your point is what? Oh wait, there is no point, you were just using the 
witnessing sleep subject to show how stupid TM'ers are. Got it.

Confounded Barry REALLY DOES BELIEVE that he can confound others.

But that's another kettle of fish.

Still tragic though.










Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

 I remember one time when the Fred Lenz - Rama guy did that to me, and I called 
him on it. We were on one of our field trips, this time I think i the Louvre 
in Paris -- no guided tours or anything, just 100 or so Rama students wandering 
around the galleries, sometimes running into him, sometimes not. 
 It must cost upwards of $10,000 each to get 100 students from Sante Fe, NM or 
Los Angeles, CA over to Paris France and inside the Louvre to look at some 
paintings. Not to mention the cost of putting Rama up at the Ritz -15 pl. 
Vendôme for a few days. Go figure.

And all that just to display his talents at losing them in the museum.

The sound like children losing their parent at the museum, who are overjoyed at 
their reunion.
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  Dear Ann,

Thank you for the lunch invitation.

You will be please to know that my wife will be joining us. She was thrilled to 
be invited.

We both look forward tom seeing you and are skipping our breakfast to keep a 
hearty appetite.

Your appreciative guests.

P.S. I love Thailand (and Burma)



  








[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
So I found myself in this Egyptian room looking down at a glass 
exhibit that contained a sarcophagus and a well-preserved body. I was 
quite taken with the bones of this guy's face, and was standing there 
looking at it when Rama walked up behind me, looked down, and said, 
Yep, that was you, all right. 


/Speaking of Kings and pedigree, Barry COULD have been a famous pharoah 
in Egypt 3,000 years ago; and maybe he could have afforded a sarcophagus 
inside a large pyramid in Giza next to the ///Sphynx/; and maybe he did 
reincarnate as Barry Wright - who knows?


The problem is that if so, Barry then would have gone from being a 
wealthy Egyptian King - down to being a part-time scribe for a science 
magazine just to be able to pay the rent. I wonder what Barry did for 
him to be reincarnated as a nobody - it must be pretty depressing to 
have that kind of karma hanging over your shoulder. Go figure./


[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :

 From: LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:23 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris
 
 
   I should also add that the criteria for being included in the studies that 
Fred did was having witnessing sleep for a year.
 






And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean shit. 

One of my science article clients runs a sleep clinic, so when writing articles 
about sleep disorders I've learned a few interesting things. Such as that there 
is a subset of patients who complain that they Never fall asleep. Their 
subjective experience is that they never lose conscious awareness, so they're 
worried that they've got a sleep disorder, even though they display no symptoms 
of sleep deprivation. 

When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology during sleep, these 
folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic cycles of sleep, along 
with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity. It's just that they never 
lose their subjective awareness. In other words, a part of them is always 
awake, witnessing their subjective experience as they navigate the entire range 
of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. 

In the decade my client's practice has been open, he has treated maybe a couple 
of dozen people who report this. All of them are just normal people off the 
street. Not one of them meditates. 

Go figure.  
 

 And your point is what? Oh wait, there is no point, you were just using the 
witnessing sleep subject to show how stupid TM'ers are. Got it.

Confounded Barry REALLY DOES BELIEVE that he can confound others.

But that's another kettle of fish.

Still tragic though.

I must step away from the discussion for a brief time. I have, just now, 
located a copy of Sleep and Dreams Compiled By Jayne Gackenback in my library.

Jayne did her work near some of you, at the University of Northern Iowa, so 
some may know her.

I'll report back.

Cheers!












Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Thank you, Dan. It feels like a pretty powerful time, High Holy Days coinciding 
with Nine Days of Mother Divine. Victory Day tomorrow...
 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:10 AM, danfriedman2002 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

Dearest Share,

May your words serve as a guiding light for all who hear.

My observance: 
Yom Kippur (Hebrew: יוֹם כִּפּוּר or יום הכיפורים), Also known as Day of 
Atonement, is the holiest day of the year for the Jews. Its central themes are 
atonement and repentance. Yom Kippur completes the annual period known in 
Judaism as the High Holy Days (or sometimes the Days of Awe).  On Thursday, 
October 2, 2014 6:51 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
  

 From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

 I liked this photo series, although I can't get a couple of the HuffPo images 
to transform properly in either Firefox or Chrome. The photographer makes his 
point admirably IMO -- when Americans think of people from different ethnic 
groups, they seem to have an internal image of them based on the imprint of 
years of propaganda and prejudice, and which they then project onto the 
person they're looking at, not really seeing them at all. 

I would suggest that we often see the same phenomenon here on FFL, especially 
regarding a few people who some people love to hate. It doesn't seem to 
matter what these hate-objects really say or how they say it, the haters see 
them the way they see them in their minds anyway and characterize them using 
the same old fundamentalist stereotypes. It's as if their internal image of 
the person they dislike always wins, leaving them unable to see any other 
aspect of the person they're hating on. Some examples of Joel Parés photos are 
below in the HuffPo article, others at the link underhis name. 
  
'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation'sStereotypes

|   |
|   |  |   |   |   |   |   |
| 'Judging America' Photo Series Captures Nation's Stereot...Terrorist. 
Gangster. Stripper. Landscaper. When people are viewed as stereotypes, they're 
labeled on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion or sexual orientation. P... |
|  |
| View on www.huffingtonpost... | Preview by Yahoo |
|  |
|   |

 

Following up, one of the most fascinating things I see on this forum is the way 
that a number of people react to the word Atheist. It should be pretty clear 
at this point that jr_esq, Steve, and Nabby in particular have a *strong* 
aversion both to the word and to the ideas they have in their minds of what an 
Atheist is. From my point of view, it's as if when they hear (or read) the 
word, the thinking part of their minds turns off completely, and all they can 
do is react -- emotionally, angrily, and without making much sense -- to the 
internal image of Atheists they carry around inside their heads. 

The most interesting part of this Atheist Hatred is that those who suffer from 
it seem to think that every time an atheist speaks, they're trying to convert 
those who believe in God. I've rarely ever seen this, on any forum, and don't 
think it happens very often *except* in the minds of believers. So with this in 
mind, and inspired by Joel's photos, here are a few alternative images of 
Atheists to balance the ones they seem unable to get rid of:



















  #yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722 -- #yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv0801199722 
#yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv0801199722 
#yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp #yiv0801199722hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp #yiv0801199722ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp .yiv0801199722ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp .yiv0801199722ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722ygrp-mkp .yiv0801199722ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv0801199722ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv0801199722 
#yiv0801199722ygrp-sponsor #yiv0801199722ygrp-lc #yiv0801199722hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv0801199722 
#yiv0801199722ygrp-sponsor #yiv0801199722ygrp-lc .yiv0801199722ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv0801199722 
#yiv0801199722activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv0801199722
 #yiv0801199722activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv0801199722 
#yiv0801199722activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv0801199722 #yiv0801199722activity span a 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

 That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 


I think share is a little confused. Love and hate are 
extremes. Like and dislike are moderation. The phil of Gita 
is to be moderate and maintain equipose.

Compassion is a tracendental quality. Passion is a 
terrestrial quality.

Maharishi in his BG commentary does mention that the 
enlightened man does have likes and dislikes.


  






 



[FairfieldLife] Welcome back Pluto!

2014-10-02 Thread salyavin808
Must be a frustrating time to be an astrologer, they just get used to 
pretending they have some sort of psychological and predictive use for poor old 
Pluto - after all those centuries not knowing about it - when the astronomical 
world decide it was never a planet at all!
 

 But now it's back so we can start taking note of the effects it's having on us 
again.
 

 Is Pluto about to be reinstated as a planet? 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/is-pluto-about-to-be-reinstated-as-a-planet-9769753.html

 
 


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread seerd...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Lenglish  I should also add that the criteria for being included in the 
studies that Fred did was having witnessing sleep for a year.
 

 What was the measurement / validation criteria for witnessing sleep?
 

 The validity and usefulness of the studies findings correlate with the degree 
of witnessing sleep validation, with simply self-reporting being on the low 
end of the scale. 
 

 Problems with self-reporting are extensive.  Among them, words and concepts 
mean different things to different people. Two people have the same experience 
may rate themselves differently (Yes vs No) due to differences in how they 
interpret witnessing sleep. Second, in a sub-culture that places value and 
status on witnessing sleep, a me too, look at me phenomenon may arise when 
asked if one witnesses sleep. Third, related to the above, may be wish 
fulfillment -- the mind takes strands of experience that may relate to 
witnessing sleep and weaves a satisfying interpretation such that one actual 
believes they are witnessing sleep when in fact they are not. Fourth, subjects 
often try to please researchers  telling them what they think the researchers 
want to hear. Many other weaknesses.
 








Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.
 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest.   #yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395 -- 
#yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 
0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp #yiv2997660395hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp #yiv2997660395ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp .yiv2997660395ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp .yiv2997660395ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-mkp .yiv2997660395ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv2997660395ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv2997660395 
#yiv2997660395ygrp-sponsor #yiv2997660395ygrp-lc #yiv2997660395hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv2997660395 
#yiv2997660395ygrp-sponsor #yiv2997660395ygrp-lc .yiv2997660395ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv2997660395 
#yiv2997660395activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv2997660395
 #yiv2997660395activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv2997660395 
#yiv2997660395activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv2997660395 #yiv2997660395activity span 
.yiv2997660395underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv2997660395 
.yiv2997660395attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv2997660395 .yiv2997660395attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 .yiv2997660395attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv2997660395 .yiv2997660395attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv2997660395 .yiv2997660395attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv2997660395 .yiv2997660395bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv2997660395 
.yiv2997660395bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 dd.yiv2997660395last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2997660395 dd.yiv2997660395last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv2997660395 
dd.yiv2997660395last p span.yiv2997660395yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv2997660395 div.yiv2997660395attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 div.yiv2997660395attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv2997660395 div.yiv2997660395file-title a, #yiv2997660395 
div.yiv2997660395file-title a:active, #yiv2997660395 
div.yiv2997660395file-title a:hover, #yiv2997660395 div.yiv2997660395file-title 
a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 div.yiv2997660395photo-title a, 
#yiv2997660395 div.yiv2997660395photo-title a:active, #yiv2997660395 
div.yiv2997660395photo-title a:hover, #yiv2997660395 
div.yiv2997660395photo-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;}#yiv2997660395 
div#yiv2997660395ygrp-mlmsg #yiv2997660395ygrp-msg p a 
span.yiv2997660395yshortcuts 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;}#yiv2997660395 
.yiv2997660395green {color:#628c2a;}#yiv2997660395 .yiv2997660395MsoNormal 
{margin:0 0 0 0;}#yiv2997660395 o {font-size:0;}#yiv2997660395 
#yiv2997660395photos div {float:left;width:72px;}#yiv2997660395 
#yiv2997660395photos div 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 
I LOVE LISTENING-IN ON WOMEN TALKING OF LOVE.

KINDA HELPS.

back to the book

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 




 


 












[FairfieldLife] The mystery of the origin of water...

2014-10-02 Thread salyavin808
Something to think about next time you have a drink of water.
 

 http://www.popsci.com/article/science/earths-water-older-sun 
http://www.popsci.com/article/science/earths-water-older-sun

 

 

 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:

Who wouldn't want to be told that you're the reincarnation of a god?


/Non sequitur. An inference or conclusion that does not follow from the 
premises or evidence.


The Rama mentioned in the Ramayama by Valmiki was a deified hero, 
not a god. Apparently you thought your TM mantra was the name of god - 
Ram, maybe left over from your days spent as the Pharoah Ram in 
Upper Egypt.//No wonder you were attracted to the Zen Master Rama. 
It's all just a karmic mix-up. Go figure./


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
People will believe anything that makes them feel more important. If 
they've gotten to the point in their self discovery where they gain 
most of their personal sense of self-worth from the teacher they study 
with, they'll also believe anything that seems to make that teacher 
seem more important. 


/There's no doubt that your teacher, Lenz, could levitate higher than 
any of my teachers, if that kind of stage magic is important to you in 
order for you to have any sense of self-worth. It must have been a 
devastating to your ego when your teacher failed to float on water 
(RIP). Do you think you will ever get over it? Maybe in a next life?/


Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 


 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 




 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread seerd...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Turquoise said: ...And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean 
shit.  ... Such as that there is a subset of patients who complain that they 
Never fall asleep. ... When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology 
during sleep, these folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic 
cycles of sleep, along with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity
 

 Of the four stages of Non-REM sleep, in Stage 1, upon wakening, one may feel 
as if he or she has not slept. In Stage 2, muscles relax, we lose consciousness 
of the environment, etc as a preparation for deep sleep. This is not yet deep 
sleep and a sense of inner wakefulness in Stage 2 is more likely than in deep 
sleep.
 

 Stages 3 and 4 are the deep sleep states. However, as we age, Stages 3 and 4 
become less, often significantly. 
 

 Stage 1 and 2 of Non REM sleep are more conducive of the experience of being 
awake / conscious (though not necessarily of the environment). Those past 50  
and / or with sleep disorders that reduce or eliminate stage 3 and 4 stage non 
REM sleep may be more likely to experience witnessing sleep. 
 

 Reduction or elimination of Stage 3 and 4 Non REM sleep is not a good thing. A 
strong Stage 3 and 4 sleep architecture is important for many sleep and waking 
functions. Lack of sleep (not exclusively stage 3 and 4, however, however weak 
stage 3 and 4 negatively affect other sleep stages) contributes to lower 
proficiency in most cognitive functions, including memory consolidation and 
working memory. Working memory is a highly critical factor in intelligence and 
performance across a wide span of activities. Lack of adequate sleep also 
contributes to attention disorders, including the tendency of the mind to 
wander, not being able to sustain attention on a focussed task. 
 

 Sparaig points out that the study shows positive correlation of witnessing 
sleep with wandering mind -- which raises the question of whether (one of many 
possible hypotheses and models ) the states experienced by the subjects are due 
to reduced quality of sleep (poor stage 3 and 4 sleep architectured) resulting 
in attention deficits, reduced working memory capacity, and subsequent 
reduction of applied intelligence .  


Re: [FairfieldLife] Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 11:17 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:


Richard sounds really scared! Go figger.


/The conspiracy is to keep the victims out of Walnut Creek, which may 
prove impossible.//That's what I figure./




On 10/01/2014 04:30 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
Richard, conspiracy, terrorism or neither, we now have Patient Zero 
in the US. Forget Alaska! Yahoo had the following article on page 1 
this morning:


Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an 
uncontrolled Ebola outbreak 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html


image 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html






Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself fr... 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html 

Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an 
uncontrolled Ebola outbreak


View on www.naturalnews.com 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html


Preview by Yahoo



On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:15 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' 
pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
wrote:



On 9/30/2014 7:46 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com 
mailto:sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Bhairitu, I never thought of PTSD in the context of such events. But 
of course it makes perfect sense. Plus, spin meisters can use any 
situation, such as the ebola outbreak, to engender fear in people.


/The current Ebola conspiracy story is probably being perpetrated 
by the same group that spun the 9/11 WTC conspiracy story. But, if 
the WTC was a conspiracy, then the Ebola conspiracy may be true as 
well, in which case we should probably move to Alaska where there are 
no people or tall buildings./





On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:48 AM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net mailto:noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


To me 9-11 appears to be the first Shock and Awe operation for the 
endless war campaign.  It gave much of the public PTSD. Recently I 
witnessed a much smaller version of that with the recent earthquake 
we had here. People were out-of-sorts for days.


I'm amused at the reactions I'm getting here and after all you 
started this this thread. :-D
















[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread jedi_sp...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 

In terms of evolution, fear is the most primitive of 
emotions. All other emotions evolved later.

Maybe you are meaning this below. 

(1 Corinthians 13)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not 
love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If 
I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and 
all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move 
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all 
I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, 
but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient, love 
is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not 
proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not 
easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does 
not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always 
protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will 
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where 
there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part 
and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the 
imperfect disappears. 13 Now these three remain: faith, 
hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.



 --- sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 
 









 




  





Re: [FairfieldLife] Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]

/The key word in this quiz is MIGHT have ebola.//
//
//We don't know who has the ebola virus, you can't screen for it - until 
they show symptoms of being infected. And, you can't get the ebola virus 
from someone who shows no symptoms. The real problem is that it is the 
immediate family members that most often becomes infected when the 
symptoms do show up, and that's when the whole family gets exposed and 
then infected -  and from there it's an exponential pandemic spreading 
around./




On 10/1/2014 11:31 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:






*From:* Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:17 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Tinfoil hat time!

Richard sounds really scared!  Go figger.

On 10/01/2014 04:30 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com 
mailto:sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Richard, conspiracy, terrorism or neither, we now have Patient Zero 
in the US. Forget Alaska! Yahoo had the following article on page 1 
this morning:


Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an 
uncontrolled Ebola outbreak 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html


image 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html






Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself fr... 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html 

Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an 
uncontrolled Ebola outbreak


View on www.naturalnews.com 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html


Preview by Yahoo



On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:15 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' 
pundits...@gmail.com mailto:pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:



On 9/30/2014 7:46 PM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com 
mailto:sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Bhairitu, I never thought of PTSD in the context of such events. But 
of course it makes perfect sense. Plus, spin meisters can use any 
situation, such as the ebola outbreak, to engender fear in people.


/The current Ebola conspiracy story is probably being perpetrated 
by the same group that spun the 9/11 WTC conspiracy story. But, if 
the WTC was a conspiracy, then the Ebola conspiracy may be true as 
well, in which case we should probably move to Alaska where there are 
no people or tall buildings./





On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:48 AM, Bhairitu 
noozg...@sbcglobal.net mailto:noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:


To me 9-11 appears to be the first Shock and Awe operation for the 
endless war campaign.  It gave much of the public PTSD. Recently I 
witnessed a much smaller version of that with the recent earthquake 
we had here. People were out-of-sorts for days.


I'm amused at the reactions I'm getting here and after all you 
started this this thread. :-D


















Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/1/2014 11:54 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the 
millions -- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have 
been killed in this planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all 
the killing had just said, Fuck this, and gone home. 


/Good point. So, I wonder why the Netherlands fought a 100-year war to 
oust the Spaniards.//Why didn't the numbnuts just bend over and enjoy 
the Moors? Go figure./


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Jedi, love is often called an emotion but I think it is way more than that. As 
such it is beyond any dualities. Tolle said that Being has three attributes, 
peace, joy and love. I agree with him.  

I would say that evolution is love in action.
How I'd interpret vs. 10 of St. Paul's quote: when a person operates from the 
Being attribute of love, they see perfection everywhere. That is how 
imperfection disappears.
 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:11 AM, jedi_sp...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


--- sharelong60@... wrote :

Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.


In terms of evolution, fear is the most primitive of 
emotions. All other emotions evolved later.

Maybe you are meaning this below. 

(1 Corinthians 13)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not 
love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If 
I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and 
all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move 
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all 
I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, 
but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient, love 
is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not 
proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not 
easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does 
not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always 
protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will 
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where 
there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part 
and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the 
imperfect disappears. 13 Now these three remain: faith, 
hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.



--- sharelong60@... wrote :

I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.


--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 



   #yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272 -- #yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4458498272 
#yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4458498272 
#yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp #yiv4458498272hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp #yiv4458498272ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp .yiv4458498272ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp .yiv4458498272ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272ygrp-mkp .yiv4458498272ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4458498272ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4458498272 
#yiv4458498272ygrp-sponsor #yiv4458498272ygrp-lc #yiv4458498272hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4458498272 
#yiv4458498272ygrp-sponsor #yiv4458498272ygrp-lc .yiv4458498272ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4458498272 
#yiv4458498272activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4458498272
 #yiv4458498272activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4458498272 
#yiv4458498272activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4458498272 #yiv4458498272activity span 
.yiv4458498272underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4458498272 
.yiv4458498272attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4458498272 .yiv4458498272attach div a 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
On 10/01/2014 09:54 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
*From:* Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com

*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:38 PM
*Subject:* Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

I was listening to an interview of a prominent Christian leader in 
Baghdad who fears ISIS is nearing an attack on the city. He has about 
32 Iraqi army body guards. He asked one , what would he do if he saw 
ISIS coming at him and the soldier said that he would discard his 
uniform and run. The clergyman asked why he was a soldier if he 
wouldn't do his duty. The soldier replied that he just needs the 
money, a job, inferring there was no sense of duty or patriotism. I'm 
afraid this is typical of the Iraqi army. Wasn't this the norm during 
the first and second Iraq wars?



Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the 
millions -- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have 
been killed in this planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all 
the killing had just said, Fuck this, and gone home.




However they also did this during the Gulf War.  I don't think Saddam 
wanted a strong military as he probably feared they would overthrow 
him.  He had his loyal secret police instead.  I also don't think the US 
wanted a strong military there or they would overthrow the puppets we 
put in place.  Maybe we should export some of our cowboy cops to Iraq 
who would make quick work of ISIS.  And if ISIS really actually tried to 
do something in the US our gun nuts would make quick work of them.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
I  believe there is a blood test for ebola. 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 The key word in this quiz is MIGHT have ebola.
 
 We don't know who has the ebola virus, you can't screen for it - until they 
show symptoms of being infected. And, you can't get the ebola virus from 
someone who shows no symptoms. The real problem is that it is the immediate 
family members that most often becomes infected when the symptoms do show up, 
and that's when the whole family gets exposed and then infected -  and from 
there it's an exponential pandemic spreading around.
 
 
 
 On 10/1/2014 11:31 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
 
   
 
 

 From: Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Tinfoil hat time!
 
 
   
 Richard sounds really scared!  Go figger.
 
 On 10/01/2014 04:30 AM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Richard, conspiracy, terrorism or neither, we now have Patient Zero in the 
US. Forget Alaska! Yahoo had the following article on page 1 this morning:
 
 
 Topten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself from an uncontrolled 
Ebola outbreak
 
  
  
 
http://www.naturalnews.com/047078_Ebola_outbreak_preparedness_personal_protection.html
  
  
  
  
  
 Top ten things you need to do NOW to protect yourself fr... Top ten things you 
need to do NOW to protect yourself from an uncontrolled Ebola outbreak


 
 View on www.naturalnews.com
 Preview by Yahoo
 
  

  
 
 

 On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 11:15 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' punditster@... 
mailto:punditster@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 
 
   
 On 9/30/2014 7:46 PM, Share Long sharelong60@... mailto:sharelong60@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   Bhairitu,I never thought of PTSD in the context of such events. But of 
course it makes perfect sense. Plus, spin meisters can use any situation, such 
as the ebola outbreak, to engender fear in people.
 


 
 The current Ebola conspiracy story is probably being perpetrated by the same 
group that spun the 9/11 WTC conspiracy story. But, if the WTC was a 
conspiracy, then the Ebola conspiracy may be true as well, in which case we 
should probably move to Alaska where there are no people or tall buildings.
 
 
 

 On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:48 AM, Bhairitu noozguru@... 
mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 
 To me 9-11 appears to be the first Shock and Awe operation for the endless 
war campaign.  It gave much of the public PTSD.  Recently I witnessed a much 
smaller version of that with the recent earthquake we had here.  People were 
out-of-sorts for days.
 
 I'm amused at the reactions I'm getting here and after all you started this 
this thread.  :-D 













 
 


 
 










 




 
 








 



 
 







 
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Welcome back Pluto!

2014-10-02 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]
Jyotish only uses the visible planets not the outer ones.  It's tropical 
astrology that wants not only to use Pluto but asteroids as well.  But I 
guess the ice people of Plutoria must want a vote on this. ;-)


On 10/02/2014 07:33 AM, salyavin808 wrote:


Must be a frustrating time to be an astrologer, they just get used to 
pretending they have some sort of psychological and predictive use for 
poor old Pluto - after all those centuries not knowing about it - when 
the astronomical world decide it was never a planet at all!



But now it's back so we can start taking note of the effects it's 
having on us again.



Is Pluto about to be reinstated as a planet? 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/is-pluto-about-to-be-reinstated-as-a-planet-9769753.html








Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
Witnessing sleep isn't directly correlated with wandering mind.: 

 The EEG pattern and general location of active brain centers during pure 
consciousness is similar to normal mind wandering except the EEG is a bit 
slower, far more coherent and the power in the EEG frequencies that are 
associated with active thinking and perception are lower.
 

 As Maharishi sez, the mind has been allowed to wander towards its level of 
least excitation.
 

 

 

 L

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :

 Turquoise said: ...And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not 
mean shit.  ... Such as that there is a subset of patients who complain that 
they Never fall asleep. ... When hooked up to machines to monitor their 
physiology during sleep, these folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the 
classic cycles of sleep, along with their accompanying REM or lack of REM 
activity
 

 Of the four stages of Non-REM sleep, in Stage 1, upon wakening, one may feel 
as if he or she has not slept. In Stage 2, muscles relax, we lose consciousness 
of the environment, etc as a preparation for deep sleep. This is not yet deep 
sleep and a sense of inner wakefulness in Stage 2 is more likely than in deep 
sleep.
 

 Stages 3 and 4 are the deep sleep states. However, as we age, Stages 3 and 4 
become less, often significantly. 
 

 Stage 1 and 2 of Non REM sleep are more conducive of the experience of being 
awake / conscious (though not necessarily of the environment). Those past 50  
and / or with sleep disorders that reduce or eliminate stage 3 and 4 stage non 
REM sleep may be more likely to experience witnessing sleep. 
 

 Reduction or elimination of Stage 3 and 4 Non REM sleep is not a good thing. A 
strong Stage 3 and 4 sleep architecture is important for many sleep and waking 
functions. Lack of sleep (not exclusively stage 3 and 4, however, however weak 
stage 3 and 4 negatively affect other sleep stages) contributes to lower 
proficiency in most cognitive functions, including memory consolidation and 
working memory. Working memory is a highly critical factor in intelligence and 
performance across a wide span of activities. Lack of adequate sleep also 
contributes to attention disorders, including the tendency of the mind to 
wander, not being able to sustain attention on a focussed task. 
 

 Sparaig points out that the study shows positive correlation of witnessing 
sleep with wandering mind -- which raises the question of whether (one of many 
possible hypotheses and models ) the states experienced by the subjects are due 
to reduced quality of sleep (poor stage 3 and 4 sleep architectured) resulting 
in attention deficits, reduced working memory capacity, and subsequent 
reduction of applied intelligence .  




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
funnily enough, Dan, one of my favorite writings about love is from a man, 
Emmet Fox:LOVE
There is no difficulty that enough love will not conquer;
No disease that enough love will not heal;
No door that enough love will not open;
No gulf that enough love will not bridge;
No wall that enough love will not throw down;
No sin that enough love will not redeem...
It makes no difference how deeply seated may be the trouble;
How hopeless the outlook;
How muddled the tangle;
How great the mistake;
A sufficient realization of love will dissolve it all...
If only you could love enough you would be the happiest and most powerful being 
in the world. - Emmet Fox 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:45 AM, danfriedman2002 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

I LOVE LISTENING-IN ON WOMEN TALKING OF LOVE.

KINDA HELPS.

back to the book
  On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
  

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 

  #yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250 -- #yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv4830706250 
#yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv4830706250 
#yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp #yiv4830706250hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp #yiv4830706250ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp .yiv4830706250ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp .yiv4830706250ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250ygrp-mkp .yiv4830706250ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv4830706250ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv4830706250 
#yiv4830706250ygrp-sponsor #yiv4830706250ygrp-lc #yiv4830706250hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv4830706250 
#yiv4830706250ygrp-sponsor #yiv4830706250ygrp-lc .yiv4830706250ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv4830706250 
#yiv4830706250activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv4830706250
 #yiv4830706250activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv4830706250 
#yiv4830706250activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv4830706250 #yiv4830706250activity span 
.yiv4830706250underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv4830706250 
.yiv4830706250attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv4830706250 .yiv4830706250attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4830706250 .yiv4830706250attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv4830706250 .yiv4830706250attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv4830706250 .yiv4830706250attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4830706250 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv4830706250 .yiv4830706250bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv4830706250 
.yiv4830706250bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv4830706250 dd.yiv4830706250last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4830706250 dd.yiv4830706250last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv4830706250 
dd.yiv4830706250last p span.yiv4830706250yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv4830706250 div.yiv4830706250attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv4830706250 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
The subjects self-reported having pure consciousness at all times, including 
witnessing sleep, as i understand it. 

 And the measures included EEG, not just interview questions.
 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :

 Lenglish  I should also add that the criteria for being included in the 
studies that Fred did was having witnessing sleep for a year.
 

 What was the measurement / validation criteria for witnessing sleep?
 

 The validity and usefulness of the studies findings correlate with the degree 
of witnessing sleep validation, with simply self-reporting being on the low 
end of the scale. 
 

 Problems with self-reporting are extensive.  Among them, words and concepts 
mean different things to different people. Two people have the same experience 
may rate themselves differently (Yes vs No) due to differences in how they 
interpret witnessing sleep. Second, in a sub-culture that places value and 
status on witnessing sleep, a me too, look at me phenomenon may arise when 
asked if one witnesses sleep. Third, related to the above, may be wish 
fulfillment -- the mind takes strands of experience that may relate to 
witnessing sleep and weaves a satisfying interpretation such that one actual 
believes they are witnessing sleep when in fact they are not. Fourth, subjects 
often try to please researchers  telling them what they think the researchers 
want to hear. Many other weaknesses.
 










Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

On 10/02/2014 07:02 AM, danfriedman2002 wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

On 10/1/2014 10:50 AM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:



The real psychological study should be of the 9-11 Deniers,
those who just go with the official story in spite of the
questions surrounding 9-11...


/We are still waiting for any new evidence so we can make up our
own mind.//What questions do you have?
//
//'Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report'//
//Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842



image
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842


Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842
Popular Mechanics examines the evidence and consults the experts
to refute the most persistent conspiracy theories of September 11.

View on www.popularmechan...
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842

Preview by Yahoo

/

Simpler still,

I was there. Police and firefighters reported exactly what I saw.

Everyone in the area agreed. That is stronger confirmation than
any commentator removed by distance and time who used their
analysis and imagination.

I gotta believe my lying eyes and those of the thousands of people
who shared that experience with me.

Bhairitu, in this case I'm thinking that you just may have seen
one too many movies about all this.

Stick with What You Know to Be True.



You mean like the police and firefighters who heard unexplained 
explosions going off in the building? Tell us what you saw.


I'll stick with my investigation.  Willy probably gets his expertise on 
meditation and tantra from Popular Mechanics too. :-D


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
The discussion is the conclusion, the typical end of any scientific paper. If 
this section is missing, what was the point of the paper? This part of the 
paper tells the reader what the researcher considers the conclusion drawn from 
the results of the study, often suggesting further lines of research etc.  The 
words 'cosmic consciousness' nor its abbreviation 'CC' does not appear in this 
summing up of the research, though these terms appear appears prominently 
earlier in the paper; the abbreviation CC does not appear in the paper. That is 
rather curious. For the reader not familiar with this terminology, the 
connexion might not be drawn. I have had awareness during sleep as the result 
of medications (a long time ago), awareness during sleep might have other 
causes, so I think Fred down peddled the result in not making more of it at the 
end. While awareness during sleep is a common phenomenon in spiritual 
traditions it is so far not a standard way of
 describing consciousness in scientific circles. Perhaps Fred is not trying to 
push the envelope here. But not re-mentioning CC as one of the points of the 
paper and only mentioning it as an 'integration of transcendental experiences' 
kind of dilutes the effect of states of consciousness he seems to be promoting 
in the paper.

I do not consider any of the states of consciousness as states of 
consciousness. Consciousness is mysterious and it is integral, always the same, 
Fred is describing states of the mind, which seem to be the results of the 
functioning of the brain. Consciousness, while we all know it is there, has no 
scientific definition, and you cannot define states of something which is 
undefined. Consciousness is the one undefined and undefinable value of human 
experience, and I think it will remain outside the purview of research. But we 
will find out a lot about the brain and its functioning. What Fred is 
researching is the contents of consciousness, the variable aspects of 
experience. If consciousness is absolute, it cannot have variable states. The 
nature of absolute does not really come into experience clearly until BC; until 
then you have 'reflections' of various states of mind in consciousness. And as 
I said, Fred probably has his hands tied, since at least
 while at MUM under the eye of the TMO, he cannot come to too many conclusions 
that contradict movement philosophy.

All the research you cite is a prequel to CC, mostly a foretelling of CC, 
hinting at CC, so it does not have much relevance to enlightenment, as even UC 
is unfinished business in the enlightenment realm. And once that business is 
over, everything is back where you started. Much Ado about Nothing. There have 
been people who have gone from WC to BC in a flash, so all the intermediate 
stuff is technically not necessary because enlightenment does not reveal 
anything that was not already present in WC, although in practice one seems to 
need to 'do stuff' to come to realisation. All that that happens is certain 
mistaken thoughts we have about life, go away, finally. And then life goes on, 
as it always had.



 From: lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:49 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris
 


  
He did not even mention CC in his conclusion (above) either.

Er, talk about selective quoting. There's no conclusion section, but the 
discussion section, which you only partially quote, actually starts out talking 
about the integration of transcendental experiences with waking, dreaming and 
sleeping (CC). To suggest that he doesn't mention it when its the first line of 
the first paragraph, is, well, overtly deceptive:


Discussion
Brain patterns that defined transcendental experiences during TM practice and 
the integration of transcendental experiences with waking, dreaming, and 
sleeping were mainly found in frontal brain areas. This suggests that frontal 
circuits may play a critical role in transcendental experiences and the growth 
of higher states of consciousness. These states could be called higher states 
in that (1) the subject/object relationship is different in these states 
compared to waking, sleeping, and dreaming; (2) the sense of self is more 
expanded in these states; and (3) the physiological patterns are distinct from 
those during waking, dreaming, and sleeping.
The development of higher states may be an extension of the developmental 
trajectory that began as a toddler and continued into adulthood, supporting the 
emergence of adult abstract reasoning. Brain development begins in posterior 
sensory areas, which myelinate by age four. Posterior areas process sensory 
experiences and create the concrete present. Activity in posterior areas are 
associated with the first two stages of cognitive development described by 
Piaget—the sensorimotor and preoperational stages.[53] 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
Did you miss that this was a review paper, not a study? 

 and the very definition of CC is the integration of transcendental 
experiences with waking, dreaming, and sleeping so the fact that he doesn't 
use CC should be taken that he is talking to a mainstream audience, rather than 
some group of TMers.
 

 

 

 L
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anartaxius@... wrote :

 The discussion is the conclusion, the typical end of any scientific paper. If 
this section is missing, what was the point of the paper? This part of the 
paper tells the reader what the researcher considers the conclusion drawn from 
the results of the study, often suggesting further lines of research etc.  The 
words 'cosmic consciousness' nor its abbreviation 'CC' does not appear in this 
summing up of the research, though these terms appear appears prominently 
earlier in the paper; the abbreviation CC does not appear in the paper. That is 
rather curious. For the reader not familiar with this terminology, the 
connexion might not be drawn. I have had awareness during sleep as the result 
of medications (a long time ago), awareness during sleep might have other 
causes, so I think Fred down peddled the result in not making more of it at the 
end. While awareness during sleep is a common phenomenon in spiritual 
traditions it is so far not a standard way of describing consciousness in 
scientific circles. Perhaps Fred is not trying to push the envelope here. But 
not re-mentioning CC as one of the points of the paper and only mentioning it 
as an 'integration of transcendental experiences' kind of dilutes the effect of 
states of consciousness he seems to be promoting in the paper.
 

 I do not consider any of the states of consciousness as states of 
consciousness. Consciousness is mysterious and it is integral, always the same, 
Fred is describing states of the mind, which seem to be the results of the 
functioning of the brain. Consciousness, while we all know it is there, has no 
scientific definition, and you cannot define states of something which is 
undefined. Consciousness is the one undefined and undefinable value of human 
experience, and I think it will remain outside the purview of research. But we 
will find out a lot about the brain and its functioning. What Fred is 
researching is the contents of consciousness, the variable aspects of 
experience. If consciousness is absolute, it cannot have variable states. The 
nature of absolute does not really come into experience clearly until BC; until 
then you have 'reflections' of various states of mind in consciousness. And as 
I said, Fred probably has his hands tied, since at least while at MUM under the 
eye of the TMO, he cannot come to too many conclusions that contradict movement 
philosophy.
 

 All the research you cite is a prequel to CC, mostly a foretelling of CC, 
hinting at CC, so it does not have much relevance to enlightenment, as even UC 
is unfinished business in the enlightenment realm. And once that business is 
over, everything is back where you started. Much Ado about Nothing. There have 
been people who have gone from WC to BC in a flash, so all the intermediate 
stuff is technically not necessary because enlightenment does not reveal 
anything that was not already present in WC, although in practice one seems to 
need to 'do stuff' to come to realisation. All that that happens is certain 
mistaken thoughts we have about life, go away, finally. And then life goes on, 
as it always had.
 

 From: LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:49 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris
 
 
   He did not even mention CC in his conclusion (above) either.
 

 

Er, talk about selective quoting. There's no conclusion section, but the 
discussion section, which you only partially quote, actually starts out talking 
about the integration of transcendental experiences with waking, dreaming and 
sleeping (CC). To suggest that he doesn't mention it when its the first line of 
the first paragraph, is, well, overtly deceptive: 

 

 Discussion
 Brain patterns that defined transcendental experiences during TM practice and 
the integration of transcendental experiences with waking, dreaming, and 
sleeping were mainly found in frontal brain areas. This suggests that frontal 
circuits may play a critical role in transcendental experiences and the growth 
of higher states of consciousness. These states could be called higher states 
in that (1) the subject/object relationship is different in these states 
compared to waking, sleeping, and dreaming; (2) the sense of self is more 
expanded in these states; and (3) the physiological patterns are distinct from 
those during waking, dreaming, and sleeping.

 The development of higher states may be an extension of the developmental 
trajectory that began as a toddler and continued into adulthood, supporting 

[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  Dear Ann,

Thank you for the lunch invitation.

You will be please to know that my wife will be joining us. She was thrilled to 
be invited.

We both look forward tom seeing you and are skipping our breakfast to keep a 
hearty appetite.

Your appreciative guests.

P.S. I love Thailand (and Burma)

 

 I would be most honored to make your wife's acquiantance. She could do the 
ordering making sure to absolutely get a #4 for you and afterwards we could all 
talk about art. Are we meeting in Victoria or in NYC? If so I will have to have 
a visit with my niece in Brooklyn. She is an artist too.


  










Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 

 Hmmm, you are fortunate if this is your actual experience but for me it sounds 
like this came out of a book or two that you read. I'm not saying this is not 
your experience it is just that it doesn't sound like your every day experience.
 
 


 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 




 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread seerd...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Love may be an emotion, an attribute of Being, a dominant quality in higher 
states, etc, but it also has a neurological and brain chemical basis (see below 
article as a starting point).
 I wonder a lot about this, including:
 To what extent does manifest love in higher states,particularly GC,  living 
and ecstatic bhakti, devotion, etc depend upon these physical bases of love?  
If a researcher were to dramatically lower serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, 
oxytocin and other key love-related chemicals (and/or modify receptors and 
activation potentials) in (validated) subjects experiencing sustained 
high/intense love, how would the love experience change?  
 What role does meditation, yoga (including breath work) play in creating 
sustained and balanced levels of these brain chemicals (and related changes to 
receptors, activation potentials, etc)?
 Given many roads towards the enhanced levels of these chemicals (receptors, 
activation potentials, etc.) can these other modalities augment or even replace 
 (or be a detriment to) traditional yogic / meditation practices and states?
 

 (following article is provided as a starting point, not definitive)
 Source: Wiki   Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love  
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love 
 
 Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclo... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love The theory of a 
biological basis of love has been explored by such biological sciences as 
evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, anthropology and...
 
 
 
 View on en.wikipedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
 Studies in neuroscience http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience have 
involved chemicals that are present in the brain and might be involved when 
people experience love. These chemicals include: nerve growth factor 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerve_growth_factor,[8] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-8 testosterone 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone, estrogen 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen, dopamine 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine, norepinephrine 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norepinephrine, serotonin 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin, oxytocin 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxytocin, andvasopressin 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasopressin.[9] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-9 Adequate 
brain levels of testosterone seem important for both human male and female 
sexual behavior.[10] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-10 
 Dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin are more commonly found during the 
attraction phase of a relationship.[11] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-11 
 Oxytocin and vasopressin seemed to be more closely linked to long term bonding 
and relationships characterized by strong attachments.
 …
 Serotonin
 Chemically, the serotonin effects of being infatuated have a similar chemical 
appearance to obsessive-compulsive disorder, which could explain why people 
experiencing infatuation cannot think of anyone else.[13] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-13 For this 
reason some, such as anthropologist Helen Fisher, assert that taking SSRIs 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_serotonin_reuptake_inhibitor and other 
antidepressants impede one's ability to fall in love. In one particular case 
Fisher noted:
 I know of one couple on the edge of divorce. The wife was on an 
antidepressant. Then she went off it, started having orgasms once more, felt 
the renewal of sexual attraction for her husband, and they're now in love all 
over again.[14] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-14
 Oxytocin
 
 Simplified overview of the chemical basis of love.
 Main article: Oxytocin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxytocin
 The long-term attachment felt after the initial in love passionate phase of 
the relationship ends is related to oxytocin, a chemical released after 
orgasm.[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-15 
Moreover, novelty triggers attraction. Even exercising for several minutes can 
make one more attracted to other people on account of increased heart rate and 
other physiological responses.
 Nerve growth factor
 In 2005, Italian scientists at Pavia University 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavia_University found that a protein molecule 
known as the nerve growth factor 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerve_growth_factor (NGF) has high levels when 
people first fall in love, but these return to previous levels after one year. 
Specifically, four neurotrophin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotrophin 
levels (NGF, BDNF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BDNF, NT-3 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NT-3, and NT-4 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NT-4) 
of 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

 People will believe anything that makes them feel more important. If they've 
gotten to the point in their self discovery where they gain most of their 
personal sense of self-worth from the teacher they study with, they'll also 
believe anything that seems to make that teacher seem more important.  
 There's no doubt that your teacher, Lenz, could levitate higher than any of my 
teachers, if that kind of stage magic is important to you in order for you to 
have any sense of self-worth. It must have been a devastating to your ego when 
your teacher failed to float on water (RIP). Do you think you will ever get 
over it? Maybe in a next life?
 
 

 Sometimes, Ricky, you totally crack me up. You're in good form today, maybe 
you should go buy a lottery ticket.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jedi_spock@... wrote :

 
 

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

 That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 


I think share is a little confused. Love and hate are 
extremes. Like and dislike are moderation. The phil of Gita 
is to be moderate and maintain equipose.

Compassion is a tracendental quality. Passion is a 
terrestrial quality.

Maharishi in his BG commentary does mention that the 
enlightened man does have likes and dislikes.
 

 Interesting. I know that I am thankful for both the celestial and the 
terrestrial. There are times when I am passionately compassionate - feet on the 
ground, head in the clouds.


  






 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread awoelfleba...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :

 Turquoise said: ...And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not 
mean shit.  ... Such as that there is a subset of patients who complain that 
they Never fall asleep. ... When hooked up to machines to monitor their 
physiology during sleep, these folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the 
classic cycles of sleep, along with their accompanying REM or lack of REM 
activity
 

 Of the four stages of Non-REM sleep, in Stage 1, upon wakening, one may feel 
as if he or she has not slept. In Stage 2, muscles relax, we lose consciousness 
of the environment, etc as a preparation for deep sleep. This is not yet deep 
sleep and a sense of inner wakefulness in Stage 2 is more likely than in deep 
sleep.
 

 Stages 3 and 4 are the deep sleep states. However, as we age, Stages 3 and 4 
become less, often significantly. 
 

 Stage 1 and 2 of Non REM sleep are more conducive of the experience of being 
awake / conscious (though not necessarily of the environment). Those past 50  
and / or with sleep disorders that reduce or eliminate stage 3 and 4 stage non 
REM sleep may be more likely to experience witnessing sleep. 
 

 Reduction or elimination of Stage 3 and 4 Non REM sleep is not a good thing. A 
strong Stage 3 and 4 sleep architecture is important for many sleep and waking 
functions. Lack of sleep (not exclusively stage 3 and 4, however, however weak 
stage 3 and 4 negatively affect other sleep stages) contributes to lower 
proficiency in most cognitive functions, including memory consolidation and 
working memory. Working memory is a highly critical factor in intelligence and 
performance across a wide span of activities. Lack of adequate sleep also 
contributes to attention disorders, including the tendency of the mind to 
wander, not being able to sustain attention on a focussed task. 
 

 Sparaig points out that the study shows positive correlation of witnessing 
sleep with wandering mind -- which raises the question of whether (one of many 
possible hypotheses and models ) the states experienced by the subjects are due 
to reduced quality of sleep (poor stage 3 and 4 sleep architectured) resulting 
in attention deficits, reduced working memory capacity, and subsequent 
reduction of applied intelligence .  
 

 I hope bawee is reading your posts because you sound like you know what you're 
talking about. It is a lot more refreshing than reading bawee's knee-jerk (did 
I say jerk?) simple-minded reactions to everything that exist merely to try 
and make others look ignorant and small. Stick around, you and Salyavin might 
have some things in common.




Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Ann, I bet everyone has experienced this deepest level of love at some point in 
their lives. Actually, I think we ARE this, at our core. And life delivers 
whatever we need to realize this and live it all the time. Which I don't. But 
it's my intention.



 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:07 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

Hmmm, you are fortunate if this is your actual experience but for me it sounds 
like this came out of a book or two that you read. I'm not saying this is not 
your experience it is just that it doesn't sound like your every day experience.

  On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
  

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 

  #yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324 -- #yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv1773146324 
#yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv1773146324 
#yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp #yiv1773146324hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp #yiv1773146324ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp .yiv1773146324ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp .yiv1773146324ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324ygrp-mkp .yiv1773146324ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv1773146324ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv1773146324 
#yiv1773146324ygrp-sponsor #yiv1773146324ygrp-lc #yiv1773146324hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv1773146324 
#yiv1773146324ygrp-sponsor #yiv1773146324ygrp-lc .yiv1773146324ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv1773146324 
#yiv1773146324activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv1773146324
 #yiv1773146324activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv1773146324 
#yiv1773146324activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv1773146324 #yiv1773146324activity span 
.yiv1773146324underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv1773146324 
.yiv1773146324attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv1773146324 .yiv1773146324attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1773146324 .yiv1773146324attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv1773146324 .yiv1773146324attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv1773146324 .yiv1773146324attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1773146324 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv1773146324 .yiv1773146324bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv1773146324 
.yiv1773146324bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv1773146324 dd.yiv1773146324last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1773146324 dd.yiv1773146324last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv1773146324 
dd.yiv1773146324last p span.yiv1773146324yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv1773146324 div.yiv1773146324attach-table div div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv1773146324 div.yiv1773146324attach-table 
{width:400px;}#yiv1773146324 div.yiv1773146324file-title a, #yiv1773146324 
div.yiv1773146324file-title a:active, #yiv1773146324 
div.yiv1773146324file-title a:hover, #yiv1773146324 

[FairfieldLife] Research on Cosmic Consciousness... more detail

2014-10-02 Thread lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife]
The criteria the Fred used to find his subjects in CC was that they had to have 
continuous integration of transcendental experiences (TE) with waking and 
sleeping for at least 1 year.  The Cont-TE group. 

 Two other groups were chosen as well: people who intended to learn TM but had 
not yet started and had rare (less than 1 per year -the Rare-TE group) 
transcendental experiences, and people who had been practicing TM for a while, 
but did not report frequent transcendental experiences outside of meditation 
(between 1 and 10 TE per year -the Occas-TE group).
 

  A semi-structured interview and two measures of TE were used to substantiate 
subjects’ self-reports of inner experiences. 
 

  The two measures had been developed by non-TMers to measure frequency of 
transcendental experiences in the general population: Hood’s M-Scale from 
[Hood, R.W., 1975. The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of 
reported mystical experience. Journal of Scientific Study Religion 14, 29-41] 
and Baruss’s Physical-Transcendent Scale from [Baruss, E., Moore, R.J., 1992. 
Measurement of beliefs about consciousness and reality. Psychology Reports 71, 
59-64] 
 

 Group means for M-Scale were: 
 Rare-TE:/18.19 +/-6.47; 
 Occas-TE:/39.59 +/-3.15; 
 Cont-TE:/60.79 +/-0.61. 
 

 Group means for the Physical-Transcendent Scale were: 
 Rare-TE:/35.79 +/-5.21; 
 Occas-TE:/61.49 +/-4.71; 
 Cont-TE:/84.19 +/-2.96. 
 

 

 Various EEG and other physical measures were done as well as interview 
questions.
 

 

 

 

 The results were reported in two different papers:
 

 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf

 

 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf

 

 

 

 L
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
seerdope, great stuff, great to have all this gathered in one place. Wish we 
could hook up a few people recognized as great lovers of humanity and this 
world, see what their brain chemistry looks like. I bet we'd see a combo of 
chemicals we've never seen before. 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 12:08 PM, seerd...@yahoo.com 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     Love may be an emotion, an attribute of Being, a dominant quality in 
higher states, etc, but it also has a neurological and brain chemical basis 
(see below article as a starting point).I wonder a lot about this, including:
To what extent does manifest love in higher states,particularly GC,  living and 
ecstatic bhakti, devotion, etc depend upon these physical bases of love?  If a 
researcher were to dramatically lower serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, 
oxytocin and other key love-related chemicals (and/or modify receptors and 
activation potentials) in (validated) subjects experiencing sustained 
high/intense love, how would the love experience change?  What role does 
meditation, yoga (including breath work) play in creating sustained and 
balanced levels of these brain chemicals (and related changes to receptors, 
activation potentials, etc)?Given many roads towards the enhanced levels of 
these chemicals (receptors, activation potentials, etc.) can these other 
modalities augment or even replace  (or be a detriment to) traditional yogic / 
meditation practices and states?

(following article is provided as a starting point, not definitive)Source:Wiki  
 Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia   
||
||||   Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free 
encyclo...  The theory of a biological basis of love has been explored by such 
biological sciences as evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, 
anthropology and...||
|  View on en.wikipedia.org  |Preview by Yahoo|
||

 Studiesin neuroscience have involved chemicals thatare present in the brain 
and might be involved when people experience love.These chemicals include: 
nerve growth factor,[8] testosterone, estrogen, dopamine, norepinephrine, 
serotonin, oxytocin, andvasopressin.[9] Adequate brainlevels of testosterone 
seem important for both human male and female sexualbehavior.[10]  
Dopamine,norepinephrine, and serotonin are more commonly found during the 
attractionphase of a relationship.[11]  Oxytocinand vasopressin seemed to be 
more closely linked to long term bonding andrelationships characterized by 
strong attachments. … Serotonin Chemically,the serotonin effects of being 
infatuated have a similar chemical appearance to obsessive-compulsivedisorder, 
which could explain why people experiencing infatuationcannot think of anyone 
else.[13] For this reasonsome, such as anthropologist Helen Fisher, assert that 
taking SSRIs andother antidepressants impede one's ability to fall in love. In 
one particularcase Fisher noted: Iknow of one couple on the edge of divorce. 
The wife was on an antidepressant.Then she went off it, started having orgasms 
once more, felt the renewal ofsexual attraction for her husband, and they're 
now in love all over again.[14] Oxytocin  Simplified overview ofthe chemical 
basis of love. Mainarticle: Oxytocin Thelong-term attachment felt after the 
initial in love passionatephase of the relationship ends is related to 
oxytocin, a chemicalreleased after orgasm.[15] Moreover, noveltytriggers 
attraction. Even exercising for several minutes can make one moreattracted to 
other people on account of increased heart rate and otherphysiological 
responses. Nerve growth factor In2005, Italian scientists at Pavia University 
found that a proteinmolecule known as the nerve growth factor (NGF)has high 
levels when people first fall in love, but these return to previouslevels after 
one year. Specifically, four neurotrophin levels (NGF, BDNF, NT-3,and NT-4) of 
58 subjects who had recently fallenin love were compared with levels in two 
control groups who were either singleor already engaged in a long-term 
relationship. The results showed that NGFlevels were significantly higher in 
the subjects in love than as compared toeither of the control groups.[16] 
Cortisol Individualswho have recently fallen in love show higher levels of 
cortisol.[17] To explore whetherthis correlation was merely due to general 
changes in life associated withbeginning a relationship, Loving et al. 
performed an experimental study inwhich women who had recently fallen in love 
were randomly asked to think abouttheir partners and relationship or about a 
romantically neutral male friend.The authors found that the romance-related 
thoughts triggered an acute increasein cortisol compared with thoughts about 
the friend. The cortisol effect wasmore pronounced for those women who spent 
more time thinking about theirrelationship. NGF tends to activate 
thehypothalamic-pituitary-adrenalaxis, 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Welcome back Pluto!

2014-10-02 Thread salyavin808

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 Jyotish only uses the visible planets not the outer ones. 
 

 I guess they'd have to, not knowing about the others.
 

 It's tropical astrology that wants not only to use Pluto but asteroids as 
well. 
 

 That makes even less sense, nobody knows exactly what is out there so if you 
think a horoscope makes sense and then someone discovers something else you 
can't have been right in the first place.
 

  But I guess the ice people of Plutoria must want a vote on this. ;-) 
 

 It must be up to our solar system brothers. Looks like we'll be doing a flyby 
real soon.
 

 That cool photo was taken by NASA's New Horizons probe, which is well on it's 
way. Travelling at one million miles a day it still has 8 months before closest 
approach! I look forward to that muchly:
 

 NASA'-s New Horizons Spacecraft Near Pluto | Alternative 
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/01/nasa-s-new-horizons-spacecraft-near-pluto-2878650.html
 
 
 
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/01/nasa-s-new-horizons-spacecraft-near-pluto-2878650.html
 
 
 NASA'-s New Horizons Spacecraft Near Pluto | Alt... 
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/01/nasa-s-new-horizons-spacecraft-near-pluto-2878650.html
 One of the fastest spacecraft ever built, NASA´s New Horizons, is hurtling 
through the void at nearly one million miles per day. Launched in 2006, it has 
been in fl...
 
 
 
 View on beforeitsnews.com 
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/01/nasa-s-new-horizons-spacecraft-near-pluto-2878650.html
 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  

 
 On 10/02/2014 07:33 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
 
   Must be a frustrating time to be an astrologer, they just get used to 
pretending they have some sort of psychological and predictive use for poor old 
Pluto - after all those centuries not knowing about it - when the astronomical 
world decide it was never a planet at all!
 

 But now it's back so we can start taking note of the effects it's having on us 
again.
 

 Is Pluto about to be reinstated as a planet?
 
 
 

 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jedi_spock@... wrote :

 
 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 

In terms of evolution, fear is the most primitive of 
emotions. All other emotions evolved later.
bummer
Maybe you are meaning this below. 

(1 Corinthians 13)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not 
love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If 
I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and 
all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move 
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all 
I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, 
but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient, love 
is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not 
proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not 
easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does 
not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always 
protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will 
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where 
there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part 
and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the 
imperfect disappears. 13 Now these three remain: faith, 
hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.



 --- sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 
 









 




  







Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Jedi, love is often called an emotion but I think it is way more than that. As 
such it is beyond any dualities. Tolle said that Being has three attributes, 
peace, joy and love. I agree with him.  

 

 I would say that evolution is love in action.
 

 How I'd interpret vs. 10 of St. Paul's quote: when a person operates from the 
Being attribute of love, they see perfection everywhere. That is how 
imperfection disappears.

 
 
I'm on you side, Lovely.


 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:11 AM, jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 

In terms of evolution, fear is the most primitive of 
emotions. All other emotions evolved later.

Maybe you are meaning this below. 

(1 Corinthians 13)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not 
love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If 
I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and 
all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move 
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all 
I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, 
but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient, love 
is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not 
proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not 
easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does 
not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always 
protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will 
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where 
there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part 
and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the 
imperfect disappears. 13 Now these three remain: faith, 
hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.



 --- sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 
 














  




 


 












Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
That is how imperfection disappears. What a daily miracle that is.
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Jedi, love is often called an emotion but I think it is way more than that. As 
such it is beyond any dualities. Tolle said that Being has three attributes, 
peace, joy and love. I agree with him.  

 

 I would say that evolution is love in action.
 

 How I'd interpret vs. 10 of St. Paul's quote: when a person operates from the 
Being attribute of love, they see perfection everywhere. That is how 
imperfection disappears.

 
 
I'm on you side, Lovely.


 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:11 AM, jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 

In terms of evolution, fear is the most primitive of 
emotions. All other emotions evolved later.

Maybe you are meaning this below. 

(1 Corinthians 13)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not 
love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If 
I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and 
all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move 
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all 
I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, 
but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient, love 
is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not 
proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not 
easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does 
not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always 
protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will 
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where 
there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part 
and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the 
imperfect disappears. 13 Now these three remain: faith, 
hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.



 --- sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 
 














  




 


 














Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 Share,

I'm making the quote my New Improved Motto (money-back guaranteed):

 If only you could love enough you would be the happiest and most powerful 
being in the world. - Emmet Fox

 P.S. In return I offer a reco: This is My Beloved


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 funnily enough, Dan, one of my favorite writings about love is from a man, 
Emmet Fox:
 LOVE
 There is no difficulty that enough love will not conquer;
 No disease that enough love will not heal;
 No door that enough love will not open;
 No gulf that enough love will not bridge;
 No wall that enough love will not throw down;
 No sin that enough love will not redeem...
 It makes no difference how deeply seated may be the trouble;
 How hopeless the outlook;
 How muddled the tangle;
 How great the mistake;
 A sufficient realization of love will dissolve it all...
 
 
 


 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:45 AM, danfriedman2002 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 
I LOVE LISTENING-IN ON WOMEN TALKING OF LOVE.

KINDA HELPS.

back to the book

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 




 














 


 










  


Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Tinfoil hat time!

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 On 10/02/2014 07:02 AM, danfriedman2002 wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
punditster@... mailto:punditster@... wrote :
 
 On 10/1/2014 10:50 AM, Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

 The real psychological study should be of the 9-11 Deniers, those who just 
go with the official story in spite of the questions surrounding 9-11... 
 We are still waiting for any new evidence so we can make up our own mind. What 
questions do you have?
 
 'Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report'
 Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report 
 
 
 
 Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report Popular Mechanics examines the 
evidence and consults the experts to refute the most persistent conspiracy 
theories of September 11.


 
 View on www.popularmechan... 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 
 
 Simpler still,
 
 I was there. Police and firefighters reported exactly what I saw. 
 
 Everyone in the area agreed. That is stronger confirmation than any 
commentator removed by distance and time who used their analysis and 
imagination.
 
 I gotta believe my lying eyes and those of the thousands of people who shared 
that experience with me.
 
 Bhairitu, in this case I'm thinking that you just may have seen one too many 
movies about all this. 
 
 Stick with What You Know to Be True.



 
 You mean like the police and firefighters who heard unexplained explosions 
going off in the building? Tell us what you saw.
 
 I'll stick with my investigation.  Willy probably gets his expertise on 
meditation and tantra from Popular Mechanics too.  :-D 

Apologize to Richard for your snarky remark.
And don't put a smiley face on it.
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  Dear Ann,

Thank you for the lunch invitation.

You will be please to know that my wife will be joining us. She was thrilled to 
be invited.

We both look forward tom seeing you and are skipping our breakfast to keep a 
hearty appetite.

Your appreciative guests.

P.S. I love Thailand (and Burma)

 

 I would be most honored to make your wife's acquiantance. She could do the 
ordering making sure to absolutely get a #4 for you and afterwards we could all 
talk about art. Are we meeting in Victoria or in NYC? If so I will have to have 
a visit with my niece in Brooklyn. She is an artist too.


  My son is an artist living in Brooklyn. Does niecey need an inspiring lover?
He comes highly recommended.

And the #4 was as delicious as you said. 

Sorry, our appetites got the best of us and we couldn't wait; what with all 
those flights, taxis, packing, schlepping, walking, getting lost...

Don't thank us, we were just saving you a trip.













Re: [FairfieldLife] Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 

 Hmmm, you are fortunate if this is your actual experience but for me it sounds 
like this came out of a book or two that you read. I'm not saying this is not 
your experience it is just that it doesn't sound like your every day experience.
 
 
This is so beautiful!

So inspiring.

I'm moved.

Are those my tears dropping gently on the screen?

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 8:40 AM, awoelflebater@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 




 


 














Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :

 Love may be an emotion, an attribute of Being, a dominant quality in higher 
states, etc, but it also has a neurological and brain chemical basis (see below 
article as a starting point).
 I wonder a lot about this, including:
 To what extent does manifest love in higher states,particularly GC,  living 
and ecstatic bhakti, devotion, etc depend upon these physical bases of love?  
If a researcher were to dramatically lower serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, 
oxytocin and other key love-related chemicals (and/or modify receptors and 
activation potentials) in (validated) subjects experiencing sustained 
high/intense love, how would the love experience change?  
 What role does meditation, yoga (including breath work) play in creating 
sustained and balanced levels of these brain chemicals (and related changes to 
receptors, activation potentials, etc)?
 Given many roads towards the enhanced levels of these chemicals (receptors, 
activation potentials, etc.) can these other modalities augment or even replace 
 (or be a detriment to) traditional yogic / meditation practices and states?
 SSRS talks extensively on this:
 

 Love makes your practice fresh and new. It is love which nourishes, pushes 
forward your technique, your progress, your growth.
 

 quoted from : God Loves Fun
 

 Also see Narada Bhakti Sutra: The Aphorisms of Love. I have 3 versions; from 
Simple to Profound.

 (following article is provided as a starting point, not definitive)
 Source: Wiki   Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love  
 
 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love
 
 Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclo... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love The theory of a 
biological basis of love has been explored by such biological sciences as 
evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, anthropology and...


 
 View on en.wikipedia.org http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love
 Preview by Yahoo 
 

 Studies in neuroscience http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience have 
involved chemicals that are present in the brain and might be involved when 
people experience love. These chemicals include: nerve growth factor 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nerve_growth_factor,[8] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-8 testosterone 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Testosterone, estrogen 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estrogen, dopamine 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dopamine, norepinephrine 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norepinephrine, serotonin 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin, oxytocin 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxytocin, andvasopressin 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasopressin.[9] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-9 Adequate 
brain levels of testosterone seem important for both human male and female 
sexual behavior.[10] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-10 
 Dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin are more commonly found during the 
attraction phase of a relationship.[11] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-11 
 Oxytocin and vasopressin seemed to be more closely linked to long term bonding 
and relationships characterized by strong attachments.
 …
 Serotonin
 Chemically, the serotonin effects of being infatuated have a similar chemical 
appearance to obsessive-compulsive disorder, which could explain why people 
experiencing infatuation cannot think of anyone else.[13] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-13 For this 
reason some, such as anthropologist Helen Fisher, assert that taking SSRIs 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selective_serotonin_reuptake_inhibitor and other 
antidepressants impede one's ability to fall in love. In one particular case 
Fisher noted:
 I know of one couple on the edge of divorce. The wife was on an 
antidepressant. Then she went off it, started having orgasms once more, felt 
the renewal of sexual attraction for her husband, and they're now in love all 
over again.[14] 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-14
 Oxytocin
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chemical_basis_of_love.png
 Simplified overview of the chemical basis of love.
 Main article: Oxytocin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxytocin
 The long-term attachment felt after the initial in love passionate phase of 
the relationship ends is related to oxytocin, a chemical released after 
orgasm.[15] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_basis_of_love#cite_note-15 
Moreover, novelty triggers attraction. Even exercising for several minutes can 
make one more attracted to other people on account of increased heart rate and 
other physiological responses.
 Nerve growth factor
 In 2005, Italian scientists at Pavia University 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavia_University found that a protein 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: King Tony's Pedigree

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 On 10/1/2014 2:41 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

 People will believe anything that makes them feel more important. If they've 
gotten to the point in their self discovery where they gain most of their 
personal sense of self-worth from the teacher they study with, they'll also 
believe anything that seems to make that teacher seem more important.  
 There's no doubt that your teacher, Lenz, could levitate higher than any of my 
teachers, if that kind of stage magic is important to you in order for you to 
have any sense of self-worth. It must have been a devastating to your ego when 
your teacher failed to float on water (RIP). Do you think you will ever get 
over it? Maybe in a next life?
 
 

 Sometimes, Ricky, you totally crack me up. You're in good form today, maybe 
you should go buy a lottery ticket.

We all have won the lottery to have won Richard's commentary daily.






Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS

2014-10-02 Thread Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Kind of have to agree with you Bhairitu. I think Saddam's army was mainly for 
show. He did have his Republican Guard that would fight, though they shed their 
uniforms for civi's to blend in with the general population . However, I bet 
they are mostly ISIS now.  That cop that shot the Brown character in Mo. was 
absolutely terrifying, enough to make a Navy SEAL soil his britches. He and the 
Pillsbury Doughboy could really rattle ISIS. Hell, I'd put that little girl 
from Jersey that shot her instructor with an uzi up against ISIS, just don't 
let me be around at the time. 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 9:01 AM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net 
[FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

  On 10/01/2014 09:54 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:
  
    From: Mike Dixon mdixon.6...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 6:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Iraqi Air Force Delivers Supplies to ISIS
   
     I was listening to an interview of a prominent Christian leader in 
Baghdad who fears ISIS is nearing an attack on the city. He has about 32 Iraqi 
army body guards. He asked one , what would  he do if he saw ISIS coming at him 
and the soldier said that he would discard his uniform and run. The clergyman 
asked why he was a soldier if he wouldn't do his duty. The soldier replied that 
he just needs the money, a job, inferring there was no sense of duty or 
patriotism. I'm afraid this is typical of the Iraqi army. Wasn't this the norm 
during the first and second Iraq wars? 
 
Shouldn't it have been the norm in all places and times? Think of the 
millions -- by now probably billions -- of people who wouldn't have been killed 
in this planet's numbnuts wars if the soldiers doing all  the killing had just 
said, Fuck this, and gone home. 
 
  
 
 However they also did this during the Gulf War.  I don't think Saddam wanted a 
strong military as he probably feared they would overthrow him.  He had his 
loyal secret police instead.  I also don't think the US wanted a strong 
military there or they would overthrow the puppets we put in place.  Maybe we 
should export some of our cowboy cops to Iraq who would make quick work of 
ISIS.  And if ISIS really actually tried to do something in the US our gun 
nuts would make quick work of them. 
 
  #yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911 -- #yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp {border:1px solid 
#d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;margin:10px 0;padding:0 10px;}#yiv5094099911 
#yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;}#yiv5094099911 
#yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp #yiv5094099911hd 
{color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;margin:10px 
0;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp #yiv5094099911ads 
{margin-bottom:10px;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp .yiv5094099911ad 
{padding:0 0;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp .yiv5094099911ad p 
{margin:0;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911ygrp-mkp .yiv5094099911ad a 
{color:#ff;text-decoration:none;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911ygrp-sponsor 
#yiv5094099911ygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;}#yiv5094099911 
#yiv5094099911ygrp-sponsor #yiv5094099911ygrp-lc #yiv5094099911hd {margin:10px 
0px;font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;}#yiv5094099911 
#yiv5094099911ygrp-sponsor #yiv5094099911ygrp-lc .yiv5094099911ad 
{margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911actions 
{font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;}#yiv5094099911 
#yiv5094099911activity 
{background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;}#yiv5094099911
 #yiv5094099911activity span {font-weight:700;}#yiv5094099911 
#yiv5094099911activity span:first-child 
{text-transform:uppercase;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911activity span a 
{color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911activity span 
span {color:#ff7900;}#yiv5094099911 #yiv5094099911activity span 
.yiv5094099911underline {text-decoration:underline;}#yiv5094099911 
.yiv5094099911attach 
{clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 
0;width:400px;}#yiv5094099911 .yiv5094099911attach div a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv5094099911 .yiv5094099911attach img 
{border:none;padding-right:5px;}#yiv5094099911 .yiv5094099911attach label 
{display:block;margin-bottom:5px;}#yiv5094099911 .yiv5094099911attach label a 
{text-decoration:none;}#yiv5094099911 blockquote {margin:0 0 0 
4px;}#yiv5094099911 .yiv5094099911bold 
{font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;}#yiv5094099911 
.yiv5094099911bold a {text-decoration:none;}#yiv5094099911 dd.yiv5094099911last 
p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv5094099911 dd.yiv5094099911last p 
span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;}#yiv5094099911 
dd.yiv5094099911last p span.yiv5094099911yshortcuts 
{margin-right:0;}#yiv5094099911 div.yiv5094099911attach-table div div a 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Dan! I almost ordered this book a couple of weeks ago! 

 

 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 1:05 PM, danfriedman2002 
no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
   

     


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :

Love may be an emotion, an attribute of Being, a dominant quality in higher 
states, etc, but it also has a neurological and brain chemical basis (see below 
article as a starting point).I wonder a lot about this, including:

To what extent does manifest love in higher states,particularly GC,  living and 
ecstatic bhakti, devotion, etc depend upon these physical bases of love?  If a 
researcher were to dramatically lower serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, 
oxytocin and other key love-related chemicals (and/or modify receptors and 
activation potentials) in (validated) subjects experiencing sustained 
high/intense love, how would the love experience change?  What role does 
meditation, yoga (including breath work) play in creating sustained and 
balanced levels of these brain chemicals (and related changes to receptors, 
activation potentials, etc)?Given many roads towards the enhanced levels of 
these chemicals (receptors, activation potentials, etc.) can these other 
modalities augment or even replace  (or be a detriment to) traditional yogic / 
meditation practices and states?
SSRS talks extensively on this:
Love makes your practice fresh and new. It is love which nourishes, pushes 
forward your technique, your progress, your growth.
quoted from : God Loves Fun
Also see Narada Bhakti Sutra: The Aphorisms of Love. I have 3 versions; from 
Simple to Profound.
(following article is provided as a starting point, not definitive)Source:Wiki  
 Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia  
|  |
|  | |  | Biological basis of love - Wikipedia, the free encyclo... The 
theory of a biological basis of love has been explored by such biological 
sciences as evolutionary psychology, evolutionary biology, anthropology and... 
|  |
| View on en.wikipedia.org|   Preview by Yahoo  |
|  |

Studiesin neuroscience have involved chemicals thatare present in the brain and 
might be involved when people experience love.These chemicals include: nerve 
growth factor,[8] testosterone, estrogen, dopamine, norepinephrine, serotonin, 
oxytocin, andvasopressin.[9] Adequate brainlevels of testosterone seem 
important for both human male and female sexualbehavior.[10] 
Dopamine,norepinephrine, and serotonin are more commonly found during the 
attractionphase of a relationship.[11] Oxytocinand vasopressin seemed to be 
more closely linked to long term bonding andrelationships characterized by 
strong attachments.…SerotoninChemically,the serotonin effects of being 
infatuated have a similar chemical appearance to obsessive-compulsivedisorder, 
which could explain why people experiencing infatuationcannot think of anyone 
else.[13] For this reasonsome, such as anthropologist Helen Fisher, assert that 
taking SSRIs andother antidepressants impede one's ability to fall in love. In 
one particularcase Fisher noted:Iknow of one couple on the edge of divorce. The 
wife was on an antidepressant.Then she went off it, started having orgasms once 
more, felt the renewal ofsexual attraction for her husband, and they're now in 
love all over again.[14]OxytocinSimplified overview ofthe chemical basis of 
love.Mainarticle: OxytocinThelong-term attachment felt after the initial in 
love passionatephase of the relationship ends is related to oxytocin, a 
chemicalreleased after orgasm.[15] Moreover, noveltytriggers attraction. Even 
exercising for several minutes can make one moreattracted to other people on 
account of increased heart rate and otherphysiological responses.Nerve growth 
factorIn2005, Italian scientists at Pavia University found that a 
proteinmolecule known as the nerve growth factor (NGF)has high levels when 
people first fall in love, but these return to previouslevels after one year. 
Specifically, four neurotrophin levels (NGF, BDNF, NT-3,and NT-4) of 58 
subjects who had recently fallenin love were compared with levels in two 
control groups who were either singleor already engaged in a long-term 
relationship. The results showed that NGFlevels were significantly higher in 
the subjects in love than as compared toeither of the control 
groups.[16]CortisolIndividualswho have recently fallen in love show higher 
levels of cortisol.[17] To explore whetherthis correlation was merely due to 
general changes in life associated withbeginning a relationship, Loving et al. 
performed an experimental study inwhich women who had recently fallen in love 
were randomly asked to think abouttheir partners and relationship or about a 
romantically neutral male friend.The authors found that the romance-related 
thoughts triggered an acute increasein cortisol compared with thoughts about 
the friend. The cortisol effect wasmore pronounced for those women who spent 
more time thinking about 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Welcome back Pluto!

2014-10-02 Thread Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife]

On 10/02/2014 10:31 AM, salyavin808 wrote:





---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

Jyotish only uses the visible planets not the outer ones.

I guess they'd have to, not knowing about the others.


Being that Uranus was not discovered until 1781, Neptune 1846 and 
Jyotish was around centuries before that, yes.  But then what if the 
real use of astrology is to track cycles that occur on earth?  IOW, they 
are just time markers the same way that ancient civilizations tracking 
time by the Sun and Moon.





[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Don't forget to pop into the Louvre - and I'll be watching you two scamps, so 
don't get lost! (PS In a past life, I was the grandfather of the security guard 
(who is a buddhist), protecting the Mona Lisa, on the day shift).  

 Apropos of nothing, there is a nondescript eating establishment, in a strip 
mall, in Fremont, CA that my wife and I saw, and the name instantly become part 
of our vocabulary (well, mine, anyway...). It is called, creatively, The Niche 
Business Cafe. 
 I imagine you walk in, and are given a short interview, on how niche your 
particular business is, and if you qualify, you're in. So, for example, a shoe 
salesman, is out, but a bowling shoe salesman, is seated immediately. Sporting 
goods out, but selling just fishing line? Booth or table? ... 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  Dear Ann,

Thank you for the lunch invitation.

You will be please to know that my wife will be joining us. She was thrilled to 
be invited.

We both look forward tom seeing you and are skipping our breakfast to keep a 
hearty appetite.

Your appreciative guests.

P.S. I love Thailand (and Burma)

 

 I would be most honored to make your wife's acquiantance. She could do the 
ordering making sure to absolutely get a #4 for you and afterwards we could all 
talk about art. Are we meeting in Victoria or in NYC? If so I will have to have 
a visit with my niece in Brooklyn. She is an artist too.


  My son is an artist living in Brooklyn. Does niecey need an inspiring lover?
He comes highly recommended.

And the #4 was as delicious as you said. 

Sorry, our appetites got the best of us and we couldn't wait; what with all 
those flights, taxis, packing, schlepping, walking, getting lost...

Don't thank us, we were just saving you a trip.

















[FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jedi_spock@... wrote :

 
 

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

 That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 


I think share is a little confused. 
Whttt!Love and hate are 
extremes. Like and dislike are moderation. The phil of Gita 
is to be moderate and maintain equipose.

Compassion is a tracendental quality. Passion is a 
terrestrial quality.

Maharishi in his BG commentary does mention that the 
enlightened man does have likes and dislikes.


  You have disrupted a very instructive conversation between 2 women who know 
exactly what they are talking about!

Ann, when she differs, does so like a normal person:
That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. 

You, on the other hand poke your snout in with: 
I think share is a little confused. 

I'm coming back to you!

   

  






 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seerdope@... wrote :

 Turquoise said: ...And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not 
mean shit.  ... Such as that there is a subset of patients who complain that 
they Never fall asleep. ... When hooked up to machines to monitor their 
physiology during sleep, these folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the 
classic cycles of sleep, along with their accompanying REM or lack of REM 
activity
 

 Of the four stages of Non-REM sleep, in Stage 1, upon wakening, one may feel 
as if he or she has not slept. In Stage 2, muscles relax, we lose consciousness 
of the environment, etc as a preparation for deep sleep. This is not yet deep 
sleep and a sense of inner wakefulness in Stage 2 is more likely than in deep 
sleep.
 

 Stages 3 and 4 are the deep sleep states. However, as we age, Stages 3 and 4 
become less, often significantly. 
 

 Stage 1 and 2 of Non REM sleep are more conducive of the experience of being 
awake / conscious (though not necessarily of the environment). Those past 50  
and / or with sleep disorders that reduce or eliminate stage 3 and 4 stage non 
REM sleep may be more likely to experience witnessing sleep. 
 

 Reduction or elimination of Stage 3 and 4 Non REM sleep is not a good thing. A 
strong Stage 3 and 4 sleep architecture is important for many sleep and waking 
functions. Lack of sleep (not exclusively stage 3 and 4, however, however weak 
stage 3 and 4 negatively affect other sleep stages) contributes to lower 
proficiency in most cognitive functions, including memory consolidation and 
working memory. Working memory is a highly critical factor in intelligence and 
performance across a wide span of activities. Lack of adequate sleep also 
contributes to attention disorders, including the tendency of the mind to 
wander, not being able to sustain attention on a focussed task. 
 

 Sparaig points out that the study shows positive correlation of witnessing 
sleep with wandering mind -- which raises the question of whether (one of many 
possible hypotheses and models ) the states experienced by the subjects are due 
to reduced quality of sleep (poor stage 3 and 4 sleep architectured) resulting 
in attention deficits, reduced working memory capacity, and subsequent 
reduction of applied intelligence .  
 

 I hope bawee is reading your posts because you sound like you know what you're 
talking about. It is a lot more refreshing than reading bawee's knee-jerk (did 
I say jerk?) simple-minded reactions to everything that exist merely to try 
and make others look ignorant and small. Stick around, you and Salyavin might 
have some things in common.

Thanks for taking up this Issue, while I needed to step away to reread Sleep 
and Dreams: A Sourcebook Compiled by Jayne Gackenbach.

Here's some sense (and my 2 cents):

The following is a description of witnessing dreaming described by a subject:
'Often during dreaming I am awake inside, in a very peaceful, blissful state. 
Dreams come and go, thoughts about the dreams come and go, but I remian in a 
deeply peaceful state, completely separate from the dreams and the thoughts. My 
body is asleep and inert, breathing goes on regularly and mechanically, and 
inside I am just aware that I am' Gackenbach, J. and LaBerge, S (1986)









Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Photo series shows how we see people in our minds vs. how they really are

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 That is how imperfection disappears. What a daily miracle that is.
 
Which reminds me.

This Week's Tease Shirt Winner wore:

 Jerry Garcia
Lunt-Fontaine Theater


Just good Vintage Fun!


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :

 Jedi, love is often called an emotion but I think it is way more than that. As 
such it is beyond any dualities. Tolle said that Being has three attributes, 
peace, joy and love. I agree with him.  

 

 I would say that evolution is love in action.
 

 How I'd interpret vs. 10 of St. Paul's quote: when a person operates from the 
Being attribute of love, they see perfection everywhere. That is how 
imperfection disappears.

 
 
I'm on you side, Lovely.


 On Thursday, October 2, 2014 10:11 AM, jedi_spock@... [FairfieldLife] 
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote:
 
 

   

 

--- sharelong60@... wrote :

 Ann, I think love is actually the source of all other emotions, including the 
so called negative ones. If one is not totally conditioned by society, then one 
experiences love along with various emotions. At its deepest level, love is not 
overshadowed by anything because it includes them all.

 
 

In terms of evolution, fear is the most primitive of 
emotions. All other emotions evolved later.

Maybe you are meaning this below. 

(1 Corinthians 13)
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not 
love, I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. 2 If 
I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and 
all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move 
mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. 3 If I give all 
I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, 
but have not love, I gain nothing. 4 Love is patient, love 
is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not 
proud. 5 It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not 
easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. 6 Love does 
not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. 7 It always 
protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. 8 
Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will 
cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where 
there is knowledge, it will pass away. 9 For we know in part 
and we prophesy in part, 10 but when perfection comes, the 
imperfect disappears. 13 Now these three remain: faith, 
hope, and love. But the greatest of these is love.



 --- sharelong60@... wrote :
 
 I think one key to emotional good health is to be able to genuinely love a 
person even while not liking or even hating what they do.
 
 

--- awoelflebater@... wrote :

That is fascinating Share. I don't agree with that at all. Emotional good 
health might be related to loving another genuinely but I know that true 
emotional honesty also comes with acknowledging that some actions or beliefs of 
your loved one are not lovable and to experience that with all the implications 
that might lead to is the way to go, for me at least. There are moments when I 
might feel real anger or disgust toward my loved ones and in that moment the 
love has taken a second row seat although it's still in the audience. Love is 
great but so are all the other emotions you might experience in a day or a week 
or a year and this includes other things than love. I think it is mood making 
if one weren't to acknowledge that one's loved ones can't be unlovable in 
moments or are seriously flawed and in those moments love can be overshadowed 
because one is being honest. 
 














  




 


 
















Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife]
On 10/2/2014 8:36 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] 
wrote:



And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean shit.


/The EEG evidence supporting the reality of witnessing is that people 
having these experiences exhibit one of the EEG signatures of 
transcendental consciousness, which is theta/alpha (7-9 Hz) EEG relative 
power, along with the signature of deep sleep, which is delta EEG (1-4 
Hz)./ - David Orme-Johnsom




One of my science article clients runs a sleep clinic, so when writing 
articles about sleep disorders I've learned a few interesting things. 
Such as that there is a subset of patients who complain that they 
Never fall asleep. Their subjective experience is that they never 
lose conscious awareness, so they're worried that they've got a sleep 
disorder, even though they display no symptoms of sleep deprivation.


Most of the time when these kinds of conditions are examined, the 
insomniacs simply can't tell the difference between wakefulness and 
sleeping. They may think they are just resting when in reality they are 
asleep - maybe they are taking mico-naps lasting just a few minutes. /It 
is a very rare condition/ when sleep deprivation can't be explained by a 
medical science - such causes as fever, illness, genetic mutation or 
psychological disorder.


When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology during sleep, 
these folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic cycles of 
sleep, along with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity. It's 
just that they never lose their subjective awareness. In other words, 
a part of them is always awake, witnessing their subjective experience 
as they navigate the entire range of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep.


Acute or chronic insomnia is called Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI). Total 
sleeplessness has yet to be explained by science, so you seem to be one 
of the science writers today that have new information about this 
disorder. A full report should be on PubMed by now,right?


In the decade my client's practice has been open, he has treated maybe 
a couple of dozen people who report this. 


Total sleep deprivation is very rare and only about 100 cases have ever 
been the subject of a clinical study and only maybe two have never been 
explained by medical science. The quack you are working for should 
probably hire a lawyer to look into this, since according to your short 
report, there are more incidences of total sleeplessness at their clinic 
/than in the whole of medical science worldwide. /Go figure.


All of them are just normal people off the street. 


The key word here is fatal in the condition known in science as FFI, 
and leads to death in almost all cases leads to panic attacks, 
hallucinations, delirium, confusion, weight loss, and then dementia and 
death. FFI has no known cure and involves progressively worsening 
conditions. Death usually occurs between 7 and 36 months from onset, 
according to what I've read.


Not one of them meditates. 


Everyone meditates, Barry, every time they pause to think about 
something. Anyone who isn't able to think is unconscious and obviously 
sleeping. Go figure.






[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Don't forget to pop into the Louvre - and I'll be watching you two scamps, so 
don't get lost! (PS In a past life, I was the grandfather of the security guard 
(who is a buddhist), protecting the Mona Lisa, on the day shift).  

 Apropos of nothing, there is a nondescript eating establishment, in a strip 
mall, in Fremont, CA that my wife and I saw, and the name instantly become part 
of our vocabulary (well, mine, anyway...). It is called, creatively, The Niche 
Business Cafe. 
 I imagine you walk in, and are given a short interview, on how niche your 
particular business is, and if you qualify, you're in. So, for example, a shoe 
salesman, is out, but a bowling shoe salesman, is seated immediately. Sporting 
goods out, but selling just fishing line? Booth or table? ... I got it, but I'm 
not sure everyone did. 

You could start a Poll on ffl

like:

I make money the Old Fashioned Way...I don't work (doesn't sound that good when 
I see it on the screen, and Richard says this will be preserved eternally. Is 
that enough time to change it? Is it enough time to change careers? Is it 
enough time?

You and your lucky wife sound well paired (and I'm am not talking jealously).
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  Dear Ann,

Thank you for the lunch invitation.

You will be please to know that my wife will be joining us. She was thrilled to 
be invited.

We both look forward tom seeing you and are skipping our breakfast to keep a 
hearty appetite.

Your appreciative guests.

P.S. I love Thailand (and Burma)

 

 I would be most honored to make your wife's acquiantance. She could do the 
ordering making sure to absolutely get a #4 for you and afterwards we could all 
talk about art. Are we meeting in Victoria or in NYC? If so I will have to have 
a visit with my niece in Brooklyn. She is an artist too.


  My son is an artist living in Brooklyn. Does niecey need an inspiring lover?
He comes highly recommended.

And the #4 was as delicious as you said. 

Sorry, our appetites got the best of us and we couldn't wait; what with all 
those flights, taxis, packing, schlepping, walking, getting lost...

Don't thank us, we were just saving you a trip.



















Re: [FairfieldLife] Welcome back Pluto!

2014-10-02 Thread salyavin808

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote :

 On 10/02/2014 10:31 AM, salyavin808 wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 Jyotish only uses the visible planets not the outer ones. 
 

 I guess they'd have to, not knowing about the others.



 
 Being that Uranus was not discovered until 1781, Neptune 1846 and Jyotish was 
around centuries before that, yes.  But then what if the real use of astrology 
is to track cycles that occur on earth?  IOW, they are just time markers the 
same way that ancient civilizations tracking time by the Sun and Moon.
 
Pluto would be tracking a 248 year cycle! Bit longer than I'm expecting to be 
around. But they wouldn't just be tracking, seems to me that they would have to 
be connected for it be relevant as opposed to just a coincidence. In fact, King 
Tony joins the planets to bits of the brain, complete bollocks as far as I'm 
concerned but he's obviously thought about it. Funny thing is his diagram has 
the outer planets but no link to the brain for them. Could be the worst bit of 
science I have ever seen. But the really baffling thing for me is the chart 
itself; someone born in one place has a different effect from the same planets 
as someone born somewhere else or somewhen else. It's all too hellishly complex 
that everyone has a different map of life from the same few planets whirling 
about at the varying distances the manage during their (and our) orbit. But we 
must be locked in some sort of cycle because I've a niggling feeling we've 
discussed this before once or twice ;-)
 
 



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread danfriedman2002

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :

 On 10/2/2014 8:36 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:
 
 
 And someone should add that witnessing sleep may not mean shit. 
 
 The EEG evidence supporting the reality of witnessing is that people having 
these experiences exhibit one of the EEG signatures of transcendental 
consciousness, which is theta/alpha (7-9 Hz) EEG relative power, along with the 
signature of deep sleep, which is delta EEG (1-4 Hz). - David Orme-Johnsom
 
 
 One of my science article clients runs a sleep clinic, so when writing 
articles about sleep disorders I've learned a few interesting things. Such as 
that there is a subset of patients who complain that they Never fall asleep. 
Their subjective experience is that they never lose conscious awareness, so 
they're worried that they've got a sleep disorder, even though they display no 
symptoms of sleep deprivation. 
 
 Most of the time when these kinds of conditions are examined, the insomniacs 
simply can't tell the difference between wakefulness and sleeping. They may 
think they are just resting when in reality they are asleep - maybe they are 
taking mico-naps lasting just a few minutes. It is a very rare condition when 
sleep deprivation can't be explained by a medical science - such causes as 
fever, illness, genetic mutation or psychological disorder.
 
 When hooked up to machines to monitor their physiology during sleep, these 
folks *are*, in fact, experiencing all of the classic cycles of sleep, along 
with their accompanying REM or lack of REM activity. It's just that they never 
lose their subjective awareness. In other words, a part of them is always 
awake, witnessing their subjective experience as they navigate the entire range 
of waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. 
 
 Acute or chronic insomnia is called Fatal Familial Insomnia (FFI). Total 
sleeplessness has yet to be explained by science, so you seem to be one of the 
science writers today that have new information about this disorder. A full 
report should be on PubMed by now,right?
 
 In the decade my client's practice has been open, he has treated maybe a 
couple of dozen people who report this. 
 Total sleep deprivation is very rare and only about 100 cases have ever been 
the subject of a clinical study and only maybe two have never been explained by 
medical science. The quack you are working for should probably hire a lawyer to 
look into this, since according to your short report, there are more incidences 
of total sleeplessness at their clinic than in the whole of medical science 
worldwide. Go figure.
 
 All of them are just normal people off the street. 
 The key word here is fatal in the condition known in science as FFI, and 
leads to death in almost all cases leads to panic attacks, hallucinations, 
delirium, confusion, weight loss, and then dementia and death. FFI has no known 
cure and involves progressively worsening conditions. Death usually occurs 
between 7 and 36 months from onset, according to what I've read.
 
 Not one of them meditates. 
 Everyone meditates, Barry, every time they pause to think about something. 
Anyone who isn't able to think is unconscious and obviously sleeping. Go figure.
 
 Richard,

Is there ANYTHING YOU DON'T KNOW?

Here's a toughie:

Am I about to go to sleep for an afternoon nap in anticipation of a late-night 
out?

Or not.


Curious Dan
 
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Research on Cosmic Consciousness... more detail

2014-10-02 Thread fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
Thanks for sharing this - Very well written, and good science - (I just read 
the second one)
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 The criteria the Fred used to find his subjects in CC was that they had to 
have continuous integration of transcendental experiences (TE) with waking and 
sleeping for at least 1 year.  The Cont-TE group. 

 Two other groups were chosen as well: people who intended to learn TM but had 
not yet started and had rare (less than 1 per year -the Rare-TE group) 
transcendental experiences, and people who had been practicing TM for a while, 
but did not report frequent transcendental experiences outside of meditation 
(between 1 and 10 TE per year -the Occas-TE group).
 

  A semi-structured interview and two measures of TE were used to substantiate 
subjects’ self-reports of inner experiences. 
 

  The two measures had been developed by non-TMers to measure frequency of 
transcendental experiences in the general population: Hood’s M-Scale from 
[Hood, R.W., 1975. The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of 
reported mystical experience. Journal of Scientific Study Religion 14, 29-41] 
and Baruss’s Physical-Transcendent Scale from [Baruss, E., Moore, R.J., 1992. 
Measurement of beliefs about consciousness and reality. Psychology Reports 71, 
59-64]
 

 Group means for M-Scale were: 
 Rare-TE:/18.19 +/-6.47; 
 Occas-TE:/39.59 +/-3.15; 
 Cont-TE:/60.79 +/-0.61. 
 

 Group means for the Physical-Transcendent Scale were: 
 Rare-TE:/35.79 +/-5.21; 
 Occas-TE:/61.49 +/-4.71; 
 Cont-TE:/84.19 +/-2.96. 
 

 

 Various EEG and other physical measures were done as well as interview 
questions.
 

 

 

 

 The results were reported in two different papers:
 

 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/brain-integration-progress-report.pdf

 

 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf
 
http://www.totalbrain.ch/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/eeg-of-enlightenment.pdf

 

 

 

 L
 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 






[FairfieldLife] Re: My take on Waking Up by Sam Harris

2014-10-02 Thread fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife]
First she sailed around the world, with one other person, in a 32' boat, and 
then we met. Instantly discovered faraway places we have both been, including 
past lives (Japan and Western US) - We complement each other very well, once 
again.  
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote :

 Don't forget to pop into the Louvre - and I'll be watching you two scamps, so 
don't get lost! (PS In a past life, I was the grandfather of the security guard 
(who is a buddhist), protecting the Mona Lisa, on the day shift).  

 Apropos of nothing, there is a nondescript eating establishment, in a strip 
mall, in Fremont, CA that my wife and I saw, and the name instantly become part 
of our vocabulary (well, mine, anyway...). It is called, creatively, The Niche 
Business Cafe. 
 I imagine you walk in, and are given a short interview, on how niche your 
particular business is, and if you qualify, you're in. So, for example, a shoe 
salesman, is out, but a bowling shoe salesman, is seated immediately. Sporting 
goods out, but selling just fishing line? Booth or table? ... I got it, but I'm 
not sure everyone did. 

You could start a Poll on ffl

like:

I make money the Old Fashioned Way...I don't work (doesn't sound that good when 
I see it on the screen, and Richard says this will be preserved eternally. Is 
that enough time to change it? Is it enough time to change careers? Is it 
enough time?

You and your lucky wife sound well paired (and I'm am not talking jealously).
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater@... wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote :

 
 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote :

 
 If the formatting was wrong, here's what the interview responses were like 
from the enlightened test subjects to the question Describe your self:
 

 L1: We ordinarily think my self as this age; this color of hair; these hobbies 
. . . my experience is that my Self is a lot larger than that. It's 
immeasurably vast. . . on a physical level. It is not just restricted to this 
physical environment
 L2: It's the ‘‘I am-ness.’’ It's my Being. There's just a channel underneath 
that's just underlying everything. It's my essence there and it just doesn't 
stop where I stop. . . by ‘‘I,’’ I mean this 5 ft. 2 person that moves around 
here and there
 L3: I look out and see this beautiful divine Intelligence. . . you could say 
in the sky, in the tree, but really being expressed through these things. . . 
and these are my Self
 L4: I experience myself as being without edges or content. . . beyond the 
universe. . . all-pervading, and being absolutely thrilled, absolutely 
delighted with every motion that my body makes. With everything that my eyes 
see, my ears hear, my nose smells. There's a delight in the sense that I am 
able to penetrate that. My consciousness, my intelligence pervades everything I 
see, feel and think
 L5: When I say ’’I’’ that's the Self. There's a quality that is so pervasive 
about the Self that I'm quite sure that the ‘‘I’’ is the same ‘‘I’’ as everyone 
else's ‘‘I.’’ Not in terms of what follows right after. I am tall, I am short, 
I am fat, I am this, I am that. But the ‘‘I’’ part. The ‘‘I am’’ part is the 
same ‘‘I am’’ for you and me
 

I describe myself as L4, beginning with absolutely.

I think I'm a little bit of this and a little bit of that - kind of like what 
my husband and I ordered off the thai menu last night when we had: #9, #22 with 
tofu, #13, #55 and #60. We like to experience lots of tastes and we still have 
some left over for lunch today just in case you noticed that was a lot to eat 
for just two people.
 

 

  Dear Ann,

Thank you for the lunch invitation.

You will be please to know that my wife will be joining us. She was thrilled to 
be invited.

We both look forward tom seeing you and are skipping our breakfast to keep a 
hearty appetite.

Your appreciative guests.

P.S. I love Thailand (and Burma)

 

 I would be most honored to make your wife's acquiantance. She could do the 
ordering making sure to absolutely get a #4 for you and afterwards we could all 
talk about art. Are we meeting in Victoria or in NYC? If so I will have to have 
a visit with my niece in Brooklyn. She is an artist too.


  My son is an artist living in Brooklyn. Does niecey need an inspiring lover?
He comes highly recommended.

And the #4 was as delicious as you said. 

Sorry, our appetites got the best of us and we couldn't wait; what with all 
those flights, taxis, packing, schlepping, walking, getting lost...

Don't thank us, we were just saving you a trip.





















[FairfieldLife] On the Brink: Maitreya Emerges

2014-10-02 Thread nablusoss1008
On the Brink: Maitreya Emerges 
http://www.edgemagazine.net/2014/10/on-the-brink-maitreya-emerges/
 
 
 http://www.edgemagazine.net/2014/10/on-the-brink-maitreya-emerges/ 
 
 On the Brink: Maitreya Emerges 
http://www.edgemagazine.net/2014/10/on-the-brink-maitreya-emerges/ In the April 
2014 issue of The Edge, the title of an article asked: If the Christ or Buddha 
returned today, would you recognize Him? In that article, you read
 
 
 
 View on www.edgemagazine.net 
http://www.edgemagazine.net/2014/10/on-the-brink-maitreya-emerges/ 
 Preview by Yahoo 
 
 
  


  1   2   >